Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records, 20523-20524 [06-3791]
Download as PDF
20523
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 77
Friday, April 21, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[DHS–2005–0048]
Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of
Records
Privacy Office; Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland
Security is issuing a final rule to exempt
two Privacy Act systems of records from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k).
These systems are the Freedom of
Information Act and Privacy Act System
of Records and the Civil Rights and
Civil Liberties Matters System of
Records.
This final rule is effective April
21, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maureen Cooney, Acting Chief Privacy
Officer, Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC, by telephone
(571) 227–3813 or by facsimile (571)
227–4171.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 4, 2004, the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (69 FR
70402) to exempt two Privacy Act
systems of records from the following
provisions of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and
(I), and (f). The first system of records,
DHS/ALL 001, DHS Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act
Records Systems, allows the Department
and its components to maintain and
retrieve FOIA and Privacy Act files by
the personal identifiers of the
individuals who have submitted
requests for records under either statute.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:06 Apr 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
The second system of records, DHS–
CRCL–001, Civil Rights and Civil
Liberties Matters, covers records
alleging abuses of civil rights and civil
liberties that are submitted to the Office
for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties.
Two comments from one individual
were received on this notice of proposed
rulemaking. The comments discussed
the importance of the transparency that
comes from compliance with the FOIA
and appeared to take issue generally
with DHS’s proposal to exempt the two
record systems covered by the proposed
rule, DHS/ALL 001 and CRCL–001,
Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Matters,
from certain provisions of the Privacy
Act.
While DHS agrees that the FOIA
serves important transparency purposes,
it nevertheless believes that the
exemptions it has sought for these two
record systems are narrowly tailored to
protect agency interests. Because it is
possible that either system of records
will contain information that comes
from law enforcement or national
security files, which are themselves
exempt from the Privacy Act, allowing
access to that information derived from
such files could result in harm to the
government. In appropriate
circumstances, however, the applicable
exemptions may be waived if no harm
to the law enforcement or national
security interests of DHS would result.
Accordingly, with the exception of
two non-substantive edits to correct an
error, DHS is implementing the rule as
proposed.
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612, DHS certifies that these regulations
will not significantly affect a substantial
number of small entities. The final rule
imposes no duties or obligations on
small entities. Further, in accordance
with the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501,
DHS has determined that this final rule
would not impose new recordkeeping,
application, reporting, or other types of
information collection requirements.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Classified information, Courts,
Freedom of information, Government
employees, Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
DHS is amending Chapter I of Title 6,
Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for part 5
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 2135,
6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. Subpart B
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Add Appendix C to part 5 to read
as follows:
I
Appendix C—DHS Systems of Records
Exempt From the Privacy Act
This Appendix implements provisions of
the Privacy Act of 1974 that permit the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to
exempt its systems of records from
provisions of the Act. During the course of
normal agency operations, exempt materials
from other systems of records may become
part of the records in these and other DHS
systems. To the extent that copies of records
from other exempt systems of records are
entered into any DHS system, DHS hereby
claims the same exemptions for those records
that are claimed for the original primary
systems of records from which they
originated and claims any additional
exemptions in accordance with this rule.
Portions of the following DHS systems of
records are exempt from certain provisions of
the Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(j)
and (k):
1. DHS/ALL 001, Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) and Privacy Act (PA) Record System
allows the DHS and its components to
maintain and retrieve FOIA and Privacy Act
files by personal identifiers associated with
the persons submitting requests for
information under each statute. Pursuant to
exemptions (j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2) and (k)(5) of
the Privacy Act, portions of this system are
exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1);
(e)(4)(G), (H) and (I) and (f). Exemptions from
the particular subsections are justified, on a
case by case basis to be determined at the
time a request is made, for the following
reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for
Disclosures) because release of the
accounting of disclosures could alert the
subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of the investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS as well as the recipient agency.
Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law
enforcement efforts and/or efforts to preserve
national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation and avoid detection or
apprehension, which undermines the entire
system.
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES
20524
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 77 / Friday, April 21, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records)
because access to the records contained in
this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of the investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS or another agency. Access to the
records would permit the individual who is
the subject of a record to impede the
investigation and avoid detection or
apprehension. Amendment of the records
would interfere with ongoing investigations
and law enforcement activities and impose
an impossible administrative burden by
requiring investigations to be continuously
reinvestigated. The information contained in
the system may also include properly
classified information, the release of which
would pose a threat to national defense and/
or foreign policy. In addition, permitting
access and amendment to such information
also could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to
homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential
violations of federal law, the accuracy of
information obtained or introduced,
occasionally may be unclear or the
information may not be strictly relevant or
necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective enforcement of federal
laws, it is appropriate to retain all
information that may aid in establishing
patterns of unlawful activity.
(d) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (H) and (I)
(Agency Requirements), and (f) (Agency
Rules), because portions of this system are
exempt from the access provisions of
subsection (d).
2. DHS–CRCL–001, Civil Rights and Civil
Liberties Matters, which will cover
allegations of abuses of civil rights and civil
liberties that are submitted to the Office of
CRCL. Pursuant to exemptions (k)(1), (k)(2)
and (k)(5) of the Privacy Act, portions of this
system are exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3);
(d); (e)(1); (e)(4)(G), (H) and (I) and (f).
Exemptions from the particular subsections
are justified, on a case by case basis to be
determined at the time a request is made, for
the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for
Disclosures) because release of the
accounting of disclosures could alert the
subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of the investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS or another agency. Disclosure of the
accounting would therefore present a serious
impediment to law enforcement efforts and
efforts to preserve national security.
Disclosure of the accounting would also
permit the individual who is the subject of
a record to impede the investigation and
avoid detection or apprehension, which
undermines the entire system.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records)
because access to the records contained in
this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of the investigation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:06 Apr 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS as well as the recipient agency.
Access to the records would permit the
individual who is the subject of a record to
impede the investigation and avoid detection
or apprehension. Amendment of the records
would interfere with ongoing investigations
and law enforcement activities and impose
an impossible administrative burden by
requiring investigations to be continuously
reinvestigated. The information contained in
the system may also include properly
classified information, the release of which
would pose a threat to national defense and/
or foreign policy. In addition, permitting
access and amendment to such information
also could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to
homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential
violations of federal law, the accuracy of
information obtained or introduced,
occasionally may be unclear or the
information may not be strictly relevant or
necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective enforcement of federal
laws, it is appropriate to retain all
information that may aid in establishing
patterns of unlawful activity.
(d) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (H) and (I)
(Agency Requirements), and (f) (Agency
Rules), because this system is exempt from
the access provisions of subsection (d).
Dated: April 13, 2006.
Maureen Cooney,
Acting Chief Privacy Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–3791 Filed 4–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–10–P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Parts 303, 308, 312, 336, 347,
348, 357, 362, 363, 364, 366 and 367
RIN 3064—AD04
Revisions To Reflect the Merger of the
Bank Insurance Fund and the Savings
Association Insurance Fund
Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FDIC is amending its
regulations to reflect the recent merger
of the Bank Insurance Fund and the
Savings Association Insurance Fund,
forming the Deposit Insurance Fund.
The merger of the two deposit insurance
funds was required by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005
and was effectuated by the FDIC as of
March 31, 2006. All revisions to the
FDIC’s regulations made by the final
rule are conforming changes
necessitated by the funds merger.
DATES: Effective Date: The final rule is
effective on April 21, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph A. DiNuzzo, Counsel, (202) 898–
7349, Legal Division, Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, Washington, DC
20429.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 2102 of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (‘‘Reform
Act’’) (Pub. L. 109–171, 120 Stat. 9)
required that the FDIC merge the Bank
Insurance Fund (‘‘BIF’’) and Savings
Association Insurance Fund (‘‘SAIF’’)
into the Deposit Insurance Fund (‘‘DIF’’)
effective no later than July 1, 2006. The
FDIC effectuated the funds merger as of
March 31, 2006. As a result of the funds
merger, the BIF and SAIF were
abolished. Section 8 of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Reform Conforming
Amendments Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109–
173, 119 Stat. 3601) (‘‘Amendments
Act’’) made numerous technical and
conforming amendments to the FDI Act
relating to the merger of BIF and SAIF
into the DIF.
The final rule revises the FDIC’s
regulations to reflect the funds merger
and the elimination of BIF and SAIF.
The majority of revisions are comprised
of replacing references to BIF and SAIF
with DIF. Other changes eliminate
provisions dealing with fund
conversions and entrance and exit fees
previously required when an institution
converted from one fund to the other.
Neither the recent legislation nor the
funds merger will affect the authority of
the Financing Corporation (‘‘FICO’’) to
impose and collect, with approval of the
FDIC, assessments for anticipated
payments, issuance costs and custodial
fees on obligations issued by the FICO.1
II. The Final Rule
The following is a section-by-section
discussion of the final rule revisions to
the FDIC’s regulations.
Part 303—Filing Procedures
The final rule: (1) Eliminates the
defined term ‘‘optional conversion
(Oakar transaction)’’ in section
303.61(d) because, with the elimination
of BIF and SAIF and the formation of
the DIF, fund conversions are now
obsolete; (2) excludes ‘‘deposit
insurance fund conversions’’ from the
transactions listed in section 303.62
1 FICO is a mixed-ownership government
corporation created in 1987 to recapitalize the
Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation
(‘‘FSLIC’’) by issuing bonds to purchase capital
stock or capital certificates issued by the FSLIC.
FICO issued 30-year non-callable bonds of
approximately $8.2 billion that mature in 2017
through 2019. Competitive Equality Banking Act,
Public Law 100–86, Title III, amending section 21
of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. 1441.
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20523-20524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3791]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 77 / Friday, April 21, 2006 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 20523]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[DHS-2005-0048]
Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records
AGENCY: Privacy Office; Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security is issuing a final rule to
exempt two Privacy Act systems of records from certain provisions of
the Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k). These systems are
the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act System of Records and
the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Matters System of Records.
DATES: This final rule is effective April 21, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maureen Cooney, Acting Chief Privacy
Officer, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, by telephone
(571) 227-3813 or by facsimile (571) 227-4171.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 4, 2004, the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) published a notice of proposed rulemaking (69
FR 70402) to exempt two Privacy Act systems of records from the
following provisions of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d),
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and (f). The first system of records,
DHS/ALL 001, DHS Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act
Records Systems, allows the Department and its components to maintain
and retrieve FOIA and Privacy Act files by the personal identifiers of
the individuals who have submitted requests for records under either
statute. The second system of records, DHS-CRCL-001, Civil Rights and
Civil Liberties Matters, covers records alleging abuses of civil rights
and civil liberties that are submitted to the Office for Civil Rights
and Civil Liberties.
Two comments from one individual were received on this notice of
proposed rulemaking. The comments discussed the importance of the
transparency that comes from compliance with the FOIA and appeared to
take issue generally with DHS's proposal to exempt the two record
systems covered by the proposed rule, DHS/ALL 001 and CRCL-001, Civil
Rights and Civil Liberties Matters, from certain provisions of the
Privacy Act.
While DHS agrees that the FOIA serves important transparency
purposes, it nevertheless believes that the exemptions it has sought
for these two record systems are narrowly tailored to protect agency
interests. Because it is possible that either system of records will
contain information that comes from law enforcement or national
security files, which are themselves exempt from the Privacy Act,
allowing access to that information derived from such files could
result in harm to the government. In appropriate circumstances,
however, the applicable exemptions may be waived if no harm to the law
enforcement or national security interests of DHS would result.
Accordingly, with the exception of two non-substantive edits to
correct an error, DHS is implementing the rule as proposed.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612, DHS certifies that these regulations will not
significantly affect a substantial number of small entities. The final
rule imposes no duties or obligations on small entities. Further, in
accordance with the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
44 U.S.C. 3501, DHS has determined that this final rule would not
impose new recordkeeping, application, reporting, or other types of
information collection requirements.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Classified information, Courts, Freedom of information, Government
employees, Privacy.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS is amending Chapter I of
Title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135, 6 U.S.C. 101 et
seq.; 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
0
2. Add Appendix C to part 5 to read as follows:
Appendix C--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy Act
This Appendix implements provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974
that permit the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to exempt its
systems of records from provisions of the Act. During the course of
normal agency operations, exempt materials from other systems of
records may become part of the records in these and other DHS
systems. To the extent that copies of records from other exempt
systems of records are entered into any DHS system, DHS hereby
claims the same exemptions for those records that are claimed for
the original primary systems of records from which they originated
and claims any additional exemptions in accordance with this rule.
Portions of the following DHS systems of records are exempt from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(j)
and (k):
1. DHS/ALL 001, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act (PA) Record System allows the
DHS and its components to maintain and retrieve FOIA and Privacy Act
files by personal identifiers associated with the persons submitting
requests for information under each statute. Pursuant to exemptions
(j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2) and (k)(5) of the Privacy Act, portions of
this system are exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1);
(e)(4)(G), (H) and (I) and (f). Exemptions from the particular
subsections are justified, on a case by case basis to be determined
at the time a request is made, for the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for Disclosures) because
release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the subject of
an investigation of an actual or potential criminal, civil, or
regulatory violation to the existence of the investigation and
reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS as well as the
recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts and/or
efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the accounting
would also permit the individual who is the subject of a record to
impede the investigation and avoid detection or apprehension, which
undermines the entire system.
[[Page 20524]]
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records) because access to
the records contained in this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal,
civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of the investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS or another
agency. Access to the records would permit the individual who is the
subject of a record to impede the investigation and avoid detection
or apprehension. Amendment of the records would interfere with
ongoing investigations and law enforcement activities and impose an
impossible administrative burden by requiring investigations to be
continuously reinvestigated. The information contained in the system
may also include properly classified information, the release of
which would pose a threat to national defense and/or foreign policy.
In addition, permitting access and amendment to such information
also could disclose security-sensitive information that could be
detrimental to homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of
Information) because in the course of investigations into potential
violations of federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or
introduced, occasionally may be unclear or the information may not
be strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In
the interests of effective enforcement of federal laws, it is
appropriate to retain all information that may aid in establishing
patterns of unlawful activity.
(d) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (H) and (I) (Agency
Requirements), and (f) (Agency Rules), because portions of this
system are exempt from the access provisions of subsection (d).
2. DHS-CRCL-001, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Matters, which
will cover allegations of abuses of civil rights and civil liberties
that are submitted to the Office of CRCL. Pursuant to exemptions
(k)(1), (k)(2) and (k)(5) of the Privacy Act, portions of this
system are exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1); (e)(4)(G),
(H) and (I) and (f). Exemptions from the particular subsections are
justified, on a case by case basis to be determined at the time a
request is made, for the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for Disclosures) because
release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the subject of
an investigation of an actual or potential criminal, civil, or
regulatory violation to the existence of the investigation and
reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS or another agency.
Disclosure of the accounting would therefore present a serious
impediment to law enforcement efforts and efforts to preserve
national security. Disclosure of the accounting would also permit
the individual who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation and avoid detection or apprehension, which undermines
the entire system.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records) because access to
the records contained in this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal,
civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of the investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS as well as the
recipient agency. Access to the records would permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the investigation and avoid
detection or apprehension. Amendment of the records would interfere
with ongoing investigations and law enforcement activities and
impose an impossible administrative burden by requiring
investigations to be continuously reinvestigated. The information
contained in the system may also include properly classified
information, the release of which would pose a threat to national
defense and/or foreign policy. In addition, permitting access and
amendment to such information also could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of
Information) because in the course of investigations into potential
violations of federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or
introduced, occasionally may be unclear or the information may not
be strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In
the interests of effective enforcement of federal laws, it is
appropriate to retain all information that may aid in establishing
patterns of unlawful activity.
(d) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (H) and (I) (Agency
Requirements), and (f) (Agency Rules), because this system is exempt
from the access provisions of subsection (d).
Dated: April 13, 2006.
Maureen Cooney,
Acting Chief Privacy Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-3791 Filed 4-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-P