Action Affecting Export Privileges; Tysonic Enterprises and Chan Heep Loong; In the Matter of: Tysonic Enterprises, 10 Anson Road, 15-14 International Plaza, Singapore, 079903 SG, and, Chan Heep Loong, 10 Anson Road, 15-14 International Plaza, Singapore, 079903 SG, 95 Havelock Road, #14-583, Singapore, 160095 SG; Respondents, 20074-20076 [06-3726]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
20074
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 19, 2006 / Notices
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the Agencies’
intention to request an extension for a
currently approved information
collection in support of the program for
7 CFR part 1942, subpart A,
‘‘Community Facility Loans.’’
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by June 19, 2006 to be assured
of consideration.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Derek L. Jones, Community Programs
Loan Specialist, Rural Housing Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, STOP
0787, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0787, telephone:
(202) 720–1504.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Community Facility Loans.
OMB Number: 0575–0015.
Expiration Date of Approval: October
31, 2006.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved information
collection.
Abstract: The Community Facilities
loan program is authorized by section
306 of the Consolidated Farm and Rural
Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1926) to
make loans to public entities, nonprofit
corporations, and Indian tribes for the
development of community facilities for
public use in rural areas.
Community Facilities programs have
been in existence for many years. These
programs have financed a wide range of
projects varying in size and complexity
from large general hospitals to small day
care centers. The facilities financed are
designed to promote the development of
rural communities by providing the
infrastructure necessary to attract
residents and rural jobs.
Information will be collected by the
field offices from applicants, borrowers,
and consultants. This information will
be used to determine applicant/
borrower eligibility, project feasibility,
and to ensure borrowers operate on a
sound basis and use funds for
authorized purposes. Failure to collect
proper information could result in
improper determination of eligibility,
improper use of funds, and/or unsound
loans.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 1.9 hours per
response.
Respondents: Public bodies, not for
profits, or Indian Tribes.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
3,768.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 8.15.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 58,265 hours.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:09 Apr 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from Tracy Givelekian,
Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, at (202) 692–0039.
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Agencies, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Agencies’
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments may be sent to Tracy
Givelekian, Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Rural Development,
STOP 0742, 1400 Independence Ave.,
SW., Washington, DC 20250.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
also become a matter of public record.
Dated: March 31, 2006.
Russell T. Davis,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
Dated: April 3, 2006.
James M. Andrew,
Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 06–3695 Filed 4–18–06; 8:45 am]
Whereas, the Athens Economic
Development Corporation (the Grantee),
a Texas non–profit corporation, has
made application to the Board (FTZ
Docket 29–2005, filed 6/9/05),
requesting the establishment of a
foreign–trade zone at sites in Athens,
Texas, adjacent to the Dallas/Fort Worth
Customs port of entry;
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment has been given in the Federal
Register (70 FR 34744, 6/15/05); and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and the
Board’s regulations are satisfied, and
that approval of the application is in the
public interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
grants to the Grantee the privilege of
establishing a foreign–trade zone,
designated on the records of the Board
as Foreign–Trade Zone No. 269, at the
sites described in the application, and
subject to the Act and the Board’s
regulations, including Section 400.28.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of
April 2006.
FOREIGN–TRADE ZONES BOARD, Secretary
of Commerce, Chairman and Executive
Officer.
Carlos M. Gutierrez,
Secretary of Commerce, Chairman and
Executive Officer.
Attest:
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–5678 Filed 4–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
Bureau of Industry and Security
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign–Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 1438]
Grant of Authority, Establishment of a
Foreign–Trade Zone, Athens, Texas
Pursuant to its authority under the
Foreign–Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the Foreign–
Trade Zones Board adopts the following
Order:
Whereas, the Foreign–Trade Zones
Act provides for ’’. . . the establishment
. . . of foreign–trade zones in ports of
entry of the United States, to expedite
and encourage foreign commerce, and
for other purposes,’’ and authorizes the
Foreign–Trade Zones Board to grant to
qualified corporations the privilege of
establishing foreign–trade zones in or
adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Action Affecting Export Privileges;
Tysonic Enterprises and Chan Heep
Loong; In the Matter of: Tysonic
Enterprises, 10 Anson Road, 15–14
International Plaza, Singapore, 079903
SG, and, Chan Heep Loong, 10 Anson
Road, 15–14 International Plaza,
Singapore, 079903 SG, 95 Havelock
Road, #14–583, Singapore, 160095 SG;
Respondents
Order Temporarily Denying Export
Privileges
Pursuant to § 766.24 of the Export
Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’),1
1 15 CFR parts 730–774 (2006). The EAR are
issued under the Export Administration Act of
1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–2420
(2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since August 21, 2001, the EAA
has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR,
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), as extended by the Notice
of August 2, 2005 (70 FR 45273, (August 5, 2005)),
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 19, 2006 / Notices
the Bureau of Industry and Security
(‘‘BIS’’), U.S. Department of Commerce,
through its Office of Export Enforcement
(‘‘OEE’’), has requested that I issue an
Order temporarily denying the export
privileges under the EAR of Tysonic
Enterprises, 10 Anson Road, 15–14
International Plaza, Singapore, 079903
SG, and Chan Heep Loong, 10 Anson
Road, 15–14 International Plaza,
Singapore, 079903 SG and 95 Havelock
Road #14–583, Singapore, 160095 SG,
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
the ‘‘Respondents’’) for 180 days.
In its request, BIS has presented
evidence that shows that Chan Heep
Loong (‘‘Loong’’), the owner and
operator of Tysonic Enterprises
(‘‘Tysonic’’) caused, aided or abetted the
doing of an act prohibited by the EAR.
Specifically, Loong purchased items
subject to both the EAR and the Iranian
Transactions Regulations of the
Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign
Assets Control (OFAC),2 from U.S.
companies and caused those
commodities to be shipped to Iran
without authorization from OFAC as
required by § 746.7 of the EAR.
Specifically, the evidence shows that,
on or around February 14, 2005,
Respondents caused a U.S. company to
export GPS engines, items subject to the
EAR and classified by Export Control
Classification Number 7A994, from the
United States to Respondents in
Singapore. On or about February 24,
2005, Respondents then shipped these
items to Iran Electronics Industries
located in Shiraz, Iran. This shipment
was a transaction subject to the Iranian
Transactions Regulations, and was done
without authorization from OFAC as
required by § 746.7 of the EAR.
The evidence also shows that on or
around March 28, 2005, Respondents
caused a U.S. company to export an RF
Power Meter, an item subject to the EAR
and classified by Export Control
Classification Number 3A992, from the
United States to Respondents in
Singapore. On or about May 12, 2005,
Respondents then shipped this item to
Iran Electronics Industries located in
Shiraz, Iran. This shipment was a
transaction subject to the Iranian
Transactions Regulations, and was done
without authorization from OFAC as
required by § 746.7 of the EAR.
The evidence also demonstrates that
the Respondents were aware of
restrictions on the shipment of U.S.
commodities to Iran and that
Respondents would not deal with U.S.
has continued the EAR in effect under the
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50
U.S.C. 1701–1706 (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’).
2 See 31 CFR 560.204.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:09 Apr 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
companies that requested information
about Tysonic’s intended end-users.
I find that the evidence presented by
BIS demonstrates that the Respondents
have violated the EAR, that such
violations have been deliberate and
covert, and that there is a likelihood of
future violations, particularly given the
nature of the transactions. As such, a
Temporary Denial Order (‘‘TDO’’) is
needed to give notice to persons and
companies in the United States and
abroad that they should cease dealing
with the Respondents in export
transactions involving items subject to
the EAR. Such a TDO is consistent with
the public interest to preclude future
violations of the EAR.
Accordingly, I find that a TDO
naming Tysonic and Loong as
Respondents is necessary, in the public
interest, to prevent an imminent
violation of the EAR. This Order is
issued on an ex parte basis without a
hearing based upon BIS’s showing of an
imminent violation.
It is Therefore Ordered:
First, that the Respondents, Tysonic
Enterprises, 10 Anson Road, 15–14
International Plaza, Singapore, 079903
SG, and Chan Heep Loong, 10 Anson
Road, 15–14 International Plaza,
Singapore, 079903 SG and 95 Havelock
Road, #14–583, Singapore, 160095 SG,
(collectively the ‘‘Denied Persons’’),
may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Export Administration Regulations
(‘‘EAR’’), or in any other activity subject
to the EAR, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the EAR, or in any other
subject to the EAR; or
C. Benefiting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the EAR, or in any
other activity subject to the EAR.
Second, that no person may, directly
or indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Persons any item subject
to the EAR;
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20075
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Persons of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the EAR that has been or will
be exported from the United States,
including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction
whereby the Denied Persons acquires or
attempts to acquire such ownership,
possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Persons of
any item subject to the EAR that has
been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Persons in
the United States any item subject to the
EAR with knowledge or reason to know
that the item will be, or is intended to
be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the EAR that has
been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Persons, or service any item, of
whatever origin, that is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Persons if such service involves the use
of any item subject to the EAR that has
been or will be exported from the
United States. For purposes of this
paragraph, servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, that, after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
section 766.23 of the EAR, any other
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to any of the
Denied Persons by affiliation,
ownership, control, or position of
responsibility in the conduct of trade or
related services may also be made
subject to the provisions of this Order.
Fourth, that this Order does not
prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the EAR where the
only items involved that are subject to
the EAR are the foreign-produced direct
product of U.S.-origin technology.
In accordance with the provisions of
Section 766.24(e) of the EAR, the
Respondents may, at any time, appeal
this Order by filing a full written
statement in support of the appeal with
the Office of the Administrative Law
Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing
Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore,
Maryland 21202–4022.
In accordance with the provisions of
Section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may
seek renewal of this Order by filing a
written request not later than 20 days
before the expiration date. The
Respondents may oppose a request to
renew this Order by filing a written
submission with the Assistant Secretary
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
20076
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 19, 2006 / Notices
of Commerce for Export Enforcement,
which must be received not later than
seven days before the expiration date of
the Order.
A copy of this Order shall be served
on the Respondents and shall be
published in the Federal Register.
This Order is effective upon date of
publication in the Federal Register and
shall remain in effect for 180 days.
Entered this 12th day of April, 2006.
Darryl W. Jackson,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 06–3726 Filed 4–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–485–803]
Certain Cut–to-Length Carbon Steel
Plate from Romania: Notice of
Extension of Time Limit for the
Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 19, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Drury or Dena Crossland, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482–
3362, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Statutory Time Limits
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
requires the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) to issue the preliminary
results of an administrative review
within 245 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of an order for which
a review is requested and the final
results of review within 120 days after
the date on which the preliminary
results are published. If it is not
practicable to complete the review
within the time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend these deadlines to
a maximum of 365 days and 180 days,
respectively.
Background
On September 28, 2005, the
Department published a notice of
initiation of administrative review of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:09 Apr 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
antidumping duty order on certain cut–
to-length carbon steel plate from
Romania, covering the period August 1,
2004, through July 31, 2005. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 70 FR 56631 (September 28, 2005).
The preliminary results for this review
are currently due no later than May 3,
2006.
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results
On January 23, 2006, the Department
initiated a sales–below-cost
investigation in this review. See
Memorandum to Richard O. Weible,
Director, through Abdelali Elouaradia,
Program Manager, from John Drury and
Dena Aliadinov, Case Analysts, and
Ernest Gziryan, Case Accountant,
regarding IPSCO Steel Inc.’s Allegation
of Sales Below the Cost of Production
for Mittal Steel Galati S.A. On January
23, 2006, and March 15, 2006,
respectively, the Department issued
Section D of the Antidumping
Questionnaire and the first
Supplemental Section D Questionnaire.
The Department requires additional
time to review and analyze the
Supplemental Section D Questionnaire
response, issue additional supplemental
sales and cost questionnaires, if
necessary, and possibly verify the sales
and cost information submitted by
Mittal Steel Galati S.A. Therefore, we
find that it is not practicable to
complete this review within the
originally anticipated time limit.
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and
section 351.213(h)(2) of the
Department’s regulations allow the
Department to extend the deadline for
the preliminary results to a maximum of
365 days from the last day of the
anniversary month of the order. For the
reasons noted above, the Department is
extending the time limit for completion
of the preliminary results to no later
than August 31, 2006, in accordance
with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. We
intend to issue the final results no later
than 120 days after publication of the
notice of the preliminary results.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: April 12, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–5885 Filed 4–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–888]
Floor–Standing, Metal–Top Ironing
Tables and Parts Thereof from the
People’s Republic of China: Extension
of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of
the First Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 19, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anya Naschak, Kristina Boughton, or
Bobby Wong, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 9, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–6375, (202) 482–8173, or
(202) 482–0409, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On August 6, 2004, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published in the Federal Register an
antidumping duty order covering floor
standing, metal–top ironing tables and
parts thereof from the People’s Republic
of China (‘‘PRC’’). See Notice of
Amended Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value and
Antidumping Duty Order: Floor–
Standing, Metal–Top Ironing Tables and
Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s
Republic of China, 69 FR 47868 (August
6, 2004). The Department received
timely requests from Since Hardware
(Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. (‘‘Since
Hardware’’), Shunde Yongjian
Housewares Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shunde
Yongjiang’’), and Forever Holdings Ltd.
(‘‘Forever Holdings’’), in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(2), for an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on ironing
tables and parts thereof from the PRC,
which has an August annual
anniversary month. On September 20,
2005, the Department initiated a review
with respect to Since Hardware, Shunde
Yongjiang, and Forever Holdings. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 70 FR 56631 (September 28, 2005).
The Department has issued its
antidumping duty questionnaire and
supplemental questionnaires to Since
Hardware, Shunde Yongjiang, and
Forever Holdings. The deadline for
completion of the preliminary results is
currently May 3, 2006.
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20074-20076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3726]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Action Affecting Export Privileges; Tysonic Enterprises and Chan
Heep Loong; In the Matter of: Tysonic Enterprises, 10 Anson Road, 15-14
International Plaza, Singapore, 079903 SG, and, Chan Heep Loong, 10
Anson Road, 15-14 International Plaza, Singapore, 079903 SG, 95
Havelock Road, 14-583, Singapore, 160095 SG; Respondents
Order Temporarily Denying Export Privileges
Pursuant to Sec. 766.24 of the Export Administration Regulations
(``EAR''),\1\
[[Page 20075]]
the Bureau of Industry and Security (``BIS''), U.S. Department of
Commerce, through its Office of Export Enforcement (``OEE''), has
requested that I issue an Order temporarily denying the export
privileges under the EAR of Tysonic Enterprises, 10 Anson Road, 15-14
International Plaza, Singapore, 079903 SG, and Chan Heep Loong, 10
Anson Road, 15-14 International Plaza, Singapore, 079903 SG and 95
Havelock Road 14-583, Singapore, 160095 SG, (hereinafter
collectively referred to as the ``Respondents'') for 180 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2006). The EAR are issued under the
Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app.
Sec. Sec. 2401-2420 (2000)) (``EAA''). Since August 21, 2001, the
EAA has been in lapse and the President, through Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), as extended
by the Notice of August 2, 2005 (70 FR 45273, (August 5, 2005)), has
continued the EAR in effect under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706 (2000)) (``IEEPA'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its request, BIS has presented evidence that shows that Chan
Heep Loong (``Loong''), the owner and operator of Tysonic Enterprises
(``Tysonic'') caused, aided or abetted the doing of an act prohibited
by the EAR. Specifically, Loong purchased items subject to both the EAR
and the Iranian Transactions Regulations of the Treasury Department's
Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC),\2\ from U.S. companies and
caused those commodities to be shipped to Iran without authorization
from OFAC as required by Sec. 746.7 of the EAR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See 31 CFR 560.204.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the evidence shows that, on or around February 14,
2005, Respondents caused a U.S. company to export GPS engines, items
subject to the EAR and classified by Export Control Classification
Number 7A994, from the United States to Respondents in Singapore. On or
about February 24, 2005, Respondents then shipped these items to Iran
Electronics Industries located in Shiraz, Iran. This shipment was a
transaction subject to the Iranian Transactions Regulations, and was
done without authorization from OFAC as required by Sec. 746.7 of the
EAR.
The evidence also shows that on or around March 28, 2005,
Respondents caused a U.S. company to export an RF Power Meter, an item
subject to the EAR and classified by Export Control Classification
Number 3A992, from the United States to Respondents in Singapore. On or
about May 12, 2005, Respondents then shipped this item to Iran
Electronics Industries located in Shiraz, Iran. This shipment was a
transaction subject to the Iranian Transactions Regulations, and was
done without authorization from OFAC as required by Sec. 746.7 of the
EAR.
The evidence also demonstrates that the Respondents were aware of
restrictions on the shipment of U.S. commodities to Iran and that
Respondents would not deal with U.S. companies that requested
information about Tysonic's intended end-users.
I find that the evidence presented by BIS demonstrates that the
Respondents have violated the EAR, that such violations have been
deliberate and covert, and that there is a likelihood of future
violations, particularly given the nature of the transactions. As such,
a Temporary Denial Order (``TDO'') is needed to give notice to persons
and companies in the United States and abroad that they should cease
dealing with the Respondents in export transactions involving items
subject to the EAR. Such a TDO is consistent with the public interest
to preclude future violations of the EAR.
Accordingly, I find that a TDO naming Tysonic and Loong as
Respondents is necessary, in the public interest, to prevent an
imminent violation of the EAR. This Order is issued on an ex parte
basis without a hearing based upon BIS's showing of an imminent
violation.
It is Therefore Ordered:
First, that the Respondents, Tysonic Enterprises, 10 Anson Road,
15-14 International Plaza, Singapore, 079903 SG, and Chan Heep Loong,
10 Anson Road, 15-14 International Plaza, Singapore, 079903 SG and 95
Havelock Road, 14-583, Singapore, 160095 SG, (collectively the
``Denied Persons''), may not, directly or indirectly, participate in
any way in any transaction involving any commodity, software or
technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as ``item'') exported
or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Export
Administration Regulations (``EAR''), or in any other activity subject
to the EAR, including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the EAR, or in any other subject to
the EAR; or
C. Benefiting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the EAR, or in any other activity subject to the EAR.
Second, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Persons any
item subject to the EAR;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Denied Persons of the ownership, possession, or
control of any item subject to the EAR that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Persons acquires
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Persons of any item subject to
the EAR that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Persons in the United States any item
subject to the EAR with knowledge or reason to know that the item will
be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the EAR
that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is
owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Persons, or service any
item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by the
Denied Persons if such service involves the use of any item subject to
the EAR that has been or will be exported from the United States. For
purposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance,
repair, modification or testing.
Third, that, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided
in section 766.23 of the EAR, any other person, firm, corporation, or
business organization related to any of the Denied Persons by
affiliation, ownership, control, or position of responsibility in the
conduct of trade or related services may also be made subject to the
provisions of this Order.
Fourth, that this Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or
other transaction subject to the EAR where the only items involved that
are subject to the EAR are the foreign-produced direct product of U.S.-
origin technology.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 766.24(e) of the EAR,
the Respondents may, at any time, appeal this Order by filing a full
written statement in support of the appeal with the Office of the
Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40
South Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-4022.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 766.24(d) of the EAR,
BIS may seek renewal of this Order by filing a written request not
later than 20 days before the expiration date. The Respondents may
oppose a request to renew this Order by filing a written submission
with the Assistant Secretary
[[Page 20076]]
of Commerce for Export Enforcement, which must be received not later
than seven days before the expiration date of the Order.
A copy of this Order shall be served on the Respondents and shall
be published in the Federal Register.
This Order is effective upon date of publication in the Federal
Register and shall remain in effect for 180 days.
Entered this 12th day of April, 2006.
Darryl W. Jackson,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 06-3726 Filed 4-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M
