Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; In the Matter of Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee L.L.C. and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station); Notice of Hearing and of Opportunity To Make Oral or Written Limited Appearance Statements Concerning Proposed Uprate, 19549-19551 [E6-5582]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 2006 / Notices
PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBIC:
Executive session.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Christopher L. Helms, Executive
Director, 130 South Scott Avenue,
Tuscon, AZ 85701, (520) 670–5529.
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
Dated: April 11, 2006.
Christopher L. Helms,
Executive Director, Morris K. Udall
Scholarship and Excellence in National
Environmental Policy Foundation, and
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–3615 Filed 4–12–06; 10:04 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–FN–M
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Business and Operations Advisory
Committee; Notice of Meeting
In accordance with Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, as
amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting:
Name: Business and Operations
Advisory Committee (9556).
Date/Time: May 18, 2006; 1 p.m. to
5:30 p.m. (EST). May 19, 2006; 8 a.m.
to 12:30 p.m. (EST).
Place: National Science Foundation,
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 375.
Type of Meeting: Open.
Contact Person: Mary Ann Birchett,
National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
(703) 292–8100.
Purpose of Meeting: To provide
advice concerning issues related to the
oversight, integrity, development and
enhancement of NSF’s business
operations.
Agenda:
May 18, 2006
P.M.: Welcome and Introduction of
new members; Updates—Office of
Budget, Finance, and Award
Management, Office of Information and
Resource Management, Chief
Information Officer activities.
Presentation and Discussion—
Workforce Planning; Organizational
Excellence Assessment; NSF Strategic
Plan; Committee Discussion.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
May 19, 2006
A.M.: Presentation and Discussion—
Organizational Excellence Assessment
Follow-up; Report from Facilities
Subcommittee; Merit Review Update;
Committee Discussion; Meeting with
NSF Deputy Director; Committee
Discussion; Planning for next meeting;
feedback; other business.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Apr 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
Date: April 11, 2006.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–3603 Filed 4–13–06; 8:45 am]
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Advisory Committee for Education and
Human Resources; Notice of Meeting
In accordance with Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, as
amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting:
Name: Advisory Committee for
Education and Human Resources
(#1119).
Date/Time: May 3, 2006; 8:30 a.m. to
5 p.m. May 4, 2006; 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
Place: The Westin Arlington Gateway
Hotel, Louisa May Alcott Board Room,
801 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA
22202.
Type of Meeting: Open.
Contact Person: James Colby, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. (703)
292–5331. If you are attending the
meeting and need access to the NSF,
please contact the individual listed
above so your name may be added to the
building access list.
Purpose of Meeting: To provide
advice with respect to the Foundation’s
education and human resources
programming.
Agenda:
May 3, 2006 (Wednesday)
Time/Activity
8 a.m. Assemble in Louisa May Alcott
Board Room, Westini Arlington
Hotel
8:30 a.m.
• Introduction of New Members
• Remarks by the Chair
9 a.m. Assistant Director’s Report and
Table Conversation
10 a.m. Break
10:15 a.m. Presentation on Proposed
EHR Realignment, Table Discussion
Noon: Lunch (Place TBD)
1:30 p.m. Report on Evaluation
Activities
2:15 p.m. NSF Strategic Plan
Discussion
2:45 p.m. Break
3 p.m. EHR ‘‘Big Ideas’’ Discussion
4 p.m. COV Reports & Discussion
5 p.m. Recess
May 4, 2006 (Thursday)
Time/Activity
8 a.m. Assemble in Louisa May Alcott
Board Room
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19549
8:30 a.m. Wrap up on Realignment
Discussions
9:30 a.m. Question Development for
Director, Deputy Director Visit
10:30 a.m. Break
11 a.m. Director, Deputy Director Visit
Noon: Closing Remarks
• Housekeeping Chore: set future
meeting dates
12:30 p.m. Adjourn
Dated: April 11, 2006.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–3604 Filed 4–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–271–OLA; ASLBP No. 04–
832–02–OLA]
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; In
the Matter of Entergy Nuclear Vermont
Yankee L.L.C. and Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. (Vermont Yankee
Nuclear Power Station); Notice of
Hearing and of Opportunity To Make
Oral or Written Limited Appearance
Statements Concerning Proposed
Uprate
April 10, 2006.
Before Administrative Judges: Alex S.
Karlin, Chairman, Dr. Anthony J.
Baratta, Lester S. Rubenstein.
This proceeding concerns the
September 10, 2003 application of
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, L.L.C.
and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
(collectively, Entergy), for an
amendment to the operating license for
the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power
Station in Windham County, Vermont.
Entergy seeks a license amendment
authorizing it to increase the maximum
power level of the plant from 1593
megawatts thermal (MWt) to 1912 MWt
and to modify associated technical
specifications of the license (collectively
referred to as an ‘‘uprate’’).1 This
1 Commission regulations permit the NRC Staff to
approve a license amendment and to authorize the
licensee to implement the action (e.g., the uprate),
prior to the adjudicatory hearing if the NRC Staff
determines that the amendment involves no
‘‘significant hazard considerations.’’ See 10 CFR
2.1202(a). That is what has happened in this case.
On March 2, 2006, after finding that there are no
significant hazard considerations associated with
the Vermont Yankee uprate, the NRC Staff approved
Entergy’s request for the license amendment. See 71
FR 11682 (March 8, 2006). Entergy has already
begun to implement the uprate. However, the NRC
Staff decision shall have no effect on the
responsibility and authority of this Board to rule on
the validity of the objections raised by the
intervenors herein. As the Commission recently
explained, ‘‘If the Board determines after full
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
Continued
14APN1
19550
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 2006 / Notices
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
hereby gives notice of two matters. First,
pursuant to 10 CFR 2.315(a), the Board
will entertain oral limited appearance
statements from members of the public
regarding the requested uprate. The
limited appearance statement sessions
will be held on June 26 and 27, 2006 in
Brattleboro, Vermont. Second, pursuant
to 10 CFR part 2, subpart L, the Board
will convene an oral evidentiary hearing
to receive evidence and to question
witnesses concerning the admitted
contentions. The evidentiary hearing
will be held during the weeks of
September 11, and October 16, 2006, at
specific times and locations to be
determined.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
I. Background and Scope of Proceeding
On July 1, 2004, the Commission
issued a notice of opportunity for a
hearing on Entergy’s license amendment
request. 69 FR 39976 (July 1, 2004). Two
requests for hearing and intervention
petitions were filed—one by the
Department of Public Service of the
State of Vermont (State) and the other
by the New England Coalition (NEC).
Each sought, in accordance with 10 CFR
2.309, to interpose various contentions
challenging the uprate application. The
petitions were referred to this Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board, consisting
of Dr. Anthony J. Baratta, Lester S.
Rubenstein, and Alex S. Karlin, to
preside over this uprate proceeding. 69
FR 56797 (September 22, 2004).
On October 21 and 22, 2004, the
Board conducted an initial prehearing
conference in Brattleboro, Vermont, and
on November 22, 2004, the Board found
that the State and NEC had each
established the requisite standing to
intervene in this proceeding and that
each had submitted at least one
admissible contention concerning the
Entergy application. LBP–04–28, 60
NRC 548 (2004).
At the present time four admitted
contentions define the scope of this
uprate proceeding and thus the
appropriate scope of any limited
appearance statements. The four
contentions are as follows:
State Contention 1: Entergy has claimed
credit for containment overpressure in
demonstrating the adequacy of ECCS pumps
for plant events including a loss of coolant
accident in violation of draft General Design
Criteria 44 and 52 and therefore Entergy has
failed to demonstrate that the proposed
uprate will provide adequate protection for
public health and safety as required by 10
CFR 50.57(a)(3).
adjudication that the license amendment should not
have been granted, it may be revoked (or
conditioned).’’ CLI–06–08, 63 NRCl, l (slip op. at
3) (March 3, 2006).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Apr 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
State Contention 2: Because of the current
level of uncertainty of the calculation which
the Applicant uses to demonstrate the
adequacy of ECCS pumps, the Applicant has
not demonstrated that the use of containment
overpressure to provide the necessary net
positive suction head for ECCS pumps will
provide adequate protection for the public
health and safety as required by 10 CFR
50.57(a)(3).
NEC Contention 3: The license amendment
should not be approved unless Large
Transient Testing is a condition of the
Extended Power Uprate.2
NEC New Contention 4: The Entergy
Vermont Yankee [ENVY] license application
(including all supplements) for an extended
power uprate of 20% over rated capacity is
not in conformance with the plant specific
original licensing basis and/or 10 CFR Part
50, Appendix S, paragraph I(a), and/or 10
CFR Part 100, Appendix A, because it does
not provide analyses that are adequate,
accurate, and complete in all material
respects to demonstrate that the Vermont
Yankee Nuclear Power Station Alternate
Cooling System [ACS] in its entirety, in its
actual physical condition (or in the actual
physical condition ENVY will effectuate
prior to commencing operation at EPU), will
be able to withstand the effects of an
earthquake and other natural phenomena
without loss of capability to perform its
safety functions in service at the requested
increased plant power level.3
II. Notice of Limited Appearance
Statement Sessions
A. Date, Time, and Location of Oral
Limited Appearance Statement Sessions
The oral limited appearance sessions
will be on the following dates, at the
specified location and times:
1. Date: Monday, June 26, 2006.
Time: 6:30 pm. to 10:30 p.m.
Location: Latchis Theatre, 50 Main
Street, Brattleboro, Vermont.
2. Date: Tuesday, June 27, 2006.
Time: 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1:30 p.m.
to 4 p.m.
Location: Same as Session 1 above.
B. Participation Guidelines for Oral
Limited Appearance Statements
Any person who is not already a party
will be permitted to make an oral
statement setting forth his or her
position on matters of concern related to
this uprate proceeding.4 The
jurisdiction of this Board and the scope
of this proceeding is limited to the
uprate. Limited appearance statements
will be transcribed but are not under
2 The first three contentions are specified at LBP–
04–28, 60 NRC 548, 580 (2004).
3 This contention is specified at LBP–05–32, 62
NRC 813, 827 (2005).
4 The parties to this proceeding are Entergy
Nuclear Vermont Yankee, L.L.C. and Entergy
Nuclear Operations, Inc., the NRC Staff, the
Department of Public Service of the State of
Vermont, and the New England Coalition.
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
oath or affirmation and do not constitute
testimony or evidence. The purpose of
limited appearance statements is to
allow members of the public to alert the
Board and the parties to areas relating
to the uprate and the admitted
contentions in which evidence may
need to be adduced, and to assist the
Board in its consideration of these
issues.5
Oral limited appearance statements
will be entertained during the hours
specified above, or such lesser time as
may be necessary to accommodate the
speakers who are present.6 If all
scheduled and unscheduled speakers
present at a session have made a
presentation, the Board reserves the
right to terminate the session before the
ending times listed above.
In order to allow all interested
persons an opportunity to address the
Board, the time allotted for each oral
limited appearance statement normally
will be no more than five minutes, and
may be further limited, depending on
the number of written requests to make
an oral statement that are submitted in
accordance with section C below and/or
the number of persons present at the
designated times. At the outset of each
statement, the speaker should identify
himself or herself and specify if they
have any affiliation (such as
employment, consultancy, or
membership) with any of the parties.
C. Submitting a Request to Make an
Oral Limited Appearance Statement
Persons wishing to make an oral
statement who have submitted a timely
written request to do so will be given
priority over those who have not filed
such a request. To be considered timely,
a written request to make an oral
statement must either be mailed, faxed,
or sent by e-mail so as to be received by
5 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on
Tuesday, June 20, 2006. The request
must specify the session (Monday
evening, Tuesday morning, or Tuesday
afternoon) during which the requester
5 See 10 CFR 2.315(a); Iowa Electric Light & Power
Co. (Duane Arnold Energy Center), ALAB–108, 6
AEC 195, 196 n.4 (1973); 10 CFR part 2, Appendix
A, § III(b) (2004), deleted Final Rule, Changes to
Adjudicatory Process, 69 FR 2182, 2274 (January
14, 2004).
6 Any members of the public who plan to attend
either the evidentiary hearings or the limited
appearance sessions are advised that security
measures may be employed at the entrance to the
hearing facility, including searches of hand-carried
items such as briefcases or backpacks. In addition,
no signs are permitted at the evidentiary hearing.
However, signs no larger than 18″ by 18″ will be
permitted during the limited appearance sessions,
but may not be attached to sticks, held up, or
moved about in the rooms. Cf. Policy Statement on
Enhancing Public Participation in NRC Meetings, 67
FR 36,920, 36,923 (May 28, 2002).
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 2006 / Notices
wishes to make an oral statement. Based
on its review of the requests received by
June 20, 2006, the Licensing Board
reserves the right to cancel or shorten
any of the sessions (Monday evening,
Tuesday morning or Tuesday afternoon)
due to a lack of adequate public interest.
Written requests to make an oral
statement should be submitted to:
Mail: Office of the Secretary,
Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001.
Fax: (301) 415–1101 (verification
(301) 415–1966).
E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov.
In addition, using the same method of
service, a copy of the written request to
make an oral statement should be sent
to the Chairman of this Licensing Board
as follows:
Mail: Alex S. Karlin, Chairman, c/o:
Jonathan Rund, Esq., Law Clerk, Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board Panel, Mail
Stop T–3 E2C, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555–
0001.
Fax: (301) 415–5599 (verification
(301) 415–6094).
E-mail: jmr3@nrc.gov and
ksv@nrc.gov.
D. Written Limited Appearance
Statements (In Lieu of Oral Statements)
A written limited appearance
statement may be submitted to the
Board regarding this proceeding at any
time. Such statements should be sent to
the Office of the Secretary using the
methods prescribed above, with a copy
to the Licensing Board Chairman. A
person who has already filed a written
limited appearance statement in this
matter 7 is not required to resubmit it,
but should notify the Board, as specified
above, if he or she wishes to make an
oral statement during the June sessions.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
III. Notice of Evidentiary Hearing
In addition to the oral limited
appearance statement sessions
discussed above, the public is notified
that this Board subsequently will
conduct an evidentiary hearing on the
four contentions admitted in this
proceeding. The hearing will be
governed by the ‘‘Informal Hearing
Procedures’’ set forth in 10 CFR part,
subparts C and L, see 10 CFR 2.300–
2.390., 2.1200–2.1213, and is scheduled
to take place during the weeks of
September 11, and October 16, 2006.
Although the precise dates and
locations of the evidentiary hearings are
yet to be determined, it is the
7 See Licensing Board Memorandum and Order
(Scheduling Prehearing Conference Call and Oral
Argument) at 2–3 (October 1, 2004) (unpublished).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Apr 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
Commission’s policy and practice to
hold them in the general vicinity of the
site of the nuclear facility that is the
subject of the proceeding, so that
members of the public may attend.8 See
10 CFR 2.328–2.329, 2.331. However, it
appears that some of the contentions in
this proceeding involve some
proprietary commercial information,
which would require that those portions
of the evidentiary hearing be closed to
the general public, with only the
authorized parties able to attend.9 The
current plan is to hold the evidentiary
hearings in Vermont, if possible, except
for those portions of the proceeding that
may need to be closed to the public,
which may be held at NRC Headquarters
in Rockville, Maryland. The Board will
issue a subsequent order establishing
the exact dates, times, and locations for
the evidentiary hearing and copies of
these rulings will be available to the
public at the NRC Public Document
Room (PDR), located at One White Flint
North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland, and through the
NRC Web site, https://www.nrc.gov.
IV. Availability of Documentary
Information Regarding the Proceeding
Documents relating to this proceeding
are available for public inspection at the
Commission’s Public Document Room
or electronically from the publicly
available records component of NRC’s
Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS
is accessible from the NRC Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html (the Public Electronic
Reading Room). Persons who do not
have access to ADAMS or who
encounter problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS should
contact the NRC PDR reference staff by
telephone at (800) 397–4209, (301) 415–
4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
V. Scheduling Information Updates
Any updated/revised scheduling
information regarding the evidentiary
hearing and limited appearance sessions
can be found on the NRC Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
public-meetings/index.cfm or by calling
(800) 368–5642, extension 5036, or (301)
415–5036.
8 See Exelon Generation Co., LLC (Early Site
Permit for Clinton ESP Site), Licensing Board
Memorandum and Order (Denying Motion
Requesting Reconsideration of Initial Prehearing
Conference Location) at 2–3 (April 5, 2004)
(unpublished); 10 CFR part 2, Appendix A, § I(a)
(2004), deleted Final Rule, Changes to Adjudicatory
Process, 69 FR 2182, 2274 (January 14, 2004).
9 In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, portions of a
hearing may be closed to the public if the matters
at issue involve the discussion of confidential or
legally protected information.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19551
It is so ordered.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, April 10,
2006.
For the Atomic Safety and Licensing
Board.10
Alex S. Karlin,
Chairman, Administrative Judge.
[FR Doc. E6–5582 Filed 4–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–275 and 50–323]
Pacific Gas and Electric Company;
Notice of Consideration of Issuance of
Amendments to Facility Operating
Licenses, Proposed No Significant
Hazards Consideration Determination,
and Opportunity for a Hearing
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (the Commission) is
considering issuance of amendments to
the Facility Operating Licenses Nos.
DPR–80 and DPR–82, issued to Pacific
Gas and Electric Company (PG&E/the
licensee) for operation of the Diablo
Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
(DCPP) located in San Luis Obispo
County, California.
The proposed amendments would
delete Section 2F, ‘‘Antitrust’’ and
Appendix C, ‘‘Antitrust Conditions,’’
from the facility operating licenses.
According to the application, the
antitrust license conditions impose
what are known as the ‘‘Stanislaus
Commitments,’’ which were derived
from the licensing process for the
proposed, but never completed,
Stanislaus Nuclear Plant. The licensee
indicates that, as reflected in a 2003
Commission decision (which
subsequently was vacated), it appears to
PG&E that there is no legal authority in
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended (AEA or Act), or in the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s
(NRC’s) regulations, for the NRC to
continue to impose these conditions
absent PG&E’s consent. Moreover, in
light of changes in the electric industry,
NRC imposition of these conditions and
the prospect of NRC enforcement of
these conditions are no longer necessary
to serve their original intended purpose.
Before issuance of the proposed
license amendments, the Commission
will have made findings required by the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
10 Copies of this order were sent this date by
Internet e-mail transmission to the representatives
for (1) licensees Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee
L.L.C. and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; (2)
intervenors Vermont Department of Public Service
and New England Coalition of Brattleboro,
Vermont; and (3) the Staff.
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19549-19551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-5582]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-271-OLA; ASLBP No. 04-832-02-OLA]
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; In the Matter of Entergy
Nuclear Vermont Yankee L.L.C. and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
(Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station); Notice of Hearing and of
Opportunity To Make Oral or Written Limited Appearance Statements
Concerning Proposed Uprate
April 10, 2006.
Before Administrative Judges: Alex S. Karlin, Chairman, Dr. Anthony J.
Baratta, Lester S. Rubenstein.
This proceeding concerns the September 10, 2003 application of
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, L.L.C. and Entergy Nuclear Operations,
Inc. (collectively, Entergy), for an amendment to the operating license
for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station in Windham County,
Vermont. Entergy seeks a license amendment authorizing it to increase
the maximum power level of the plant from 1593 megawatts thermal (MWt)
to 1912 MWt and to modify associated technical specifications of the
license (collectively referred to as an ``uprate'').\1\ This
[[Page 19550]]
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board hereby gives notice of two matters.
First, pursuant to 10 CFR 2.315(a), the Board will entertain oral
limited appearance statements from members of the public regarding the
requested uprate. The limited appearance statement sessions will be
held on June 26 and 27, 2006 in Brattleboro, Vermont. Second, pursuant
to 10 CFR part 2, subpart L, the Board will convene an oral evidentiary
hearing to receive evidence and to question witnesses concerning the
admitted contentions. The evidentiary hearing will be held during the
weeks of September 11, and October 16, 2006, at specific times and
locations to be determined.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Commission regulations permit the NRC Staff to approve a
license amendment and to authorize the licensee to implement the
action (e.g., the uprate), prior to the adjudicatory hearing if the
NRC Staff determines that the amendment involves no ``significant
hazard considerations.'' See 10 CFR 2.1202(a). That is what has
happened in this case. On March 2, 2006, after finding that there
are no significant hazard considerations associated with the Vermont
Yankee uprate, the NRC Staff approved Entergy's request for the
license amendment. See 71 FR 11682 (March 8, 2006). Entergy has
already begun to implement the uprate. However, the NRC Staff
decision shall have no effect on the responsibility and authority of
this Board to rule on the validity of the objections raised by the
intervenors herein. As the Commission recently explained, ``If the
Board determines after full adjudication that the license amendment
should not have been granted, it may be revoked (or conditioned).''
CLI-06-08, 63 NRC--, -- (slip op. at 3) (March 3, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Background and Scope of Proceeding
On July 1, 2004, the Commission issued a notice of opportunity for
a hearing on Entergy's license amendment request. 69 FR 39976 (July 1,
2004). Two requests for hearing and intervention petitions were filed--
one by the Department of Public Service of the State of Vermont (State)
and the other by the New England Coalition (NEC). Each sought, in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.309, to interpose various contentions
challenging the uprate application. The petitions were referred to this
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, consisting of Dr. Anthony J.
Baratta, Lester S. Rubenstein, and Alex S. Karlin, to preside over this
uprate proceeding. 69 FR 56797 (September 22, 2004).
On October 21 and 22, 2004, the Board conducted an initial
prehearing conference in Brattleboro, Vermont, and on November 22,
2004, the Board found that the State and NEC had each established the
requisite standing to intervene in this proceeding and that each had
submitted at least one admissible contention concerning the Entergy
application. LBP-04-28, 60 NRC 548 (2004).
At the present time four admitted contentions define the scope of
this uprate proceeding and thus the appropriate scope of any limited
appearance statements. The four contentions are as follows:
State Contention 1: Entergy has claimed credit for containment
overpressure in demonstrating the adequacy of ECCS pumps for plant
events including a loss of coolant accident in violation of draft
General Design Criteria 44 and 52 and therefore Entergy has failed
to demonstrate that the proposed uprate will provide adequate
protection for public health and safety as required by 10 CFR
50.57(a)(3).
State Contention 2: Because of the current level of uncertainty
of the calculation which the Applicant uses to demonstrate the
adequacy of ECCS pumps, the Applicant has not demonstrated that the
use of containment overpressure to provide the necessary net
positive suction head for ECCS pumps will provide adequate
protection for the public health and safety as required by 10 CFR
50.57(a)(3).
NEC Contention 3: The license amendment should not be approved
unless Large Transient Testing is a condition of the Extended Power
Uprate.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The first three contentions are specified at LBP-04-28, 60
NRC 548, 580 (2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEC New Contention 4: The Entergy Vermont Yankee [ENVY] license
application (including all supplements) for an extended power uprate
of 20% over rated capacity is not in conformance with the plant
specific original licensing basis and/or 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix S,
paragraph I(a), and/or 10 CFR Part 100, Appendix A, because it does
not provide analyses that are adequate, accurate, and complete in
all material respects to demonstrate that the Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Station Alternate Cooling System [ACS] in its entirety, in its
actual physical condition (or in the actual physical condition ENVY
will effectuate prior to commencing operation at EPU), will be able
to withstand the effects of an earthquake and other natural
phenomena without loss of capability to perform its safety functions
in service at the requested increased plant power level.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ This contention is specified at LBP-05-32, 62 NRC 813, 827
(2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Notice of Limited Appearance Statement Sessions
A. Date, Time, and Location of Oral Limited Appearance Statement
Sessions
The oral limited appearance sessions will be on the following
dates, at the specified location and times:
1. Date: Monday, June 26, 2006.
Time: 6:30 pm. to 10:30 p.m.
Location: Latchis Theatre, 50 Main Street, Brattleboro, Vermont.
2. Date: Tuesday, June 27, 2006.
Time: 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.
Location: Same as Session 1 above.
B. Participation Guidelines for Oral Limited Appearance Statements
Any person who is not already a party will be permitted to make an
oral statement setting forth his or her position on matters of concern
related to this uprate proceeding.\4\ The jurisdiction of this Board
and the scope of this proceeding is limited to the uprate. Limited
appearance statements will be transcribed but are not under oath or
affirmation and do not constitute testimony or evidence. The purpose of
limited appearance statements is to allow members of the public to
alert the Board and the parties to areas relating to the uprate and the
admitted contentions in which evidence may need to be adduced, and to
assist the Board in its consideration of these issues.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The parties to this proceeding are Entergy Nuclear Vermont
Yankee, L.L.C. and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., the NRC Staff,
the Department of Public Service of the State of Vermont, and the
New England Coalition.
\5\ See 10 CFR 2.315(a); Iowa Electric Light & Power Co. (Duane
Arnold Energy Center), ALAB-108, 6 AEC 195, 196 n.4 (1973); 10 CFR
part 2, Appendix A, Sec. III(b) (2004), deleted Final Rule, Changes
to Adjudicatory Process, 69 FR 2182, 2274 (January 14, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oral limited appearance statements will be entertained during the
hours specified above, or such lesser time as may be necessary to
accommodate the speakers who are present.\6\ If all scheduled and
unscheduled speakers present at a session have made a presentation, the
Board reserves the right to terminate the session before the ending
times listed above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Any members of the public who plan to attend either the
evidentiary hearings or the limited appearance sessions are advised
that security measures may be employed at the entrance to the
hearing facility, including searches of hand-carried items such as
briefcases or backpacks. In addition, no signs are permitted at the
evidentiary hearing. However, signs no larger than 18[sec] by
18[sec] will be permitted during the limited appearance sessions,
but may not be attached to sticks, held up, or moved about in the
rooms. Cf. Policy Statement on Enhancing Public Participation in NRC
Meetings, 67 FR 36,920, 36,923 (May 28, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to allow all interested persons an opportunity to address
the Board, the time allotted for each oral limited appearance statement
normally will be no more than five minutes, and may be further limited,
depending on the number of written requests to make an oral statement
that are submitted in accordance with section C below and/or the number
of persons present at the designated times. At the outset of each
statement, the speaker should identify himself or herself and specify
if they have any affiliation (such as employment, consultancy, or
membership) with any of the parties.
C. Submitting a Request to Make an Oral Limited Appearance Statement
Persons wishing to make an oral statement who have submitted a
timely written request to do so will be given priority over those who
have not filed such a request. To be considered timely, a written
request to make an oral statement must either be mailed, faxed, or sent
by e-mail so as to be received by 5 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on
Tuesday, June 20, 2006. The request must specify the session (Monday
evening, Tuesday morning, or Tuesday afternoon) during which the
requester
[[Page 19551]]
wishes to make an oral statement. Based on its review of the requests
received by June 20, 2006, the Licensing Board reserves the right to
cancel or shorten any of the sessions (Monday evening, Tuesday morning
or Tuesday afternoon) due to a lack of adequate public interest.
Written requests to make an oral statement should be submitted to:
Mail: Office of the Secretary, Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Fax: (301) 415-1101 (verification (301) 415-1966).
E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov.
In addition, using the same method of service, a copy of the
written request to make an oral statement should be sent to the
Chairman of this Licensing Board as follows:
Mail: Alex S. Karlin, Chairman, c/o: Jonathan Rund, Esq., Law
Clerk, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, Mail Stop T-3 E2C, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001.
Fax: (301) 415-5599 (verification (301) 415-6094).
E-mail: jmr3@nrc.gov and ksv@nrc.gov.
D. Written Limited Appearance Statements (In Lieu of Oral Statements)
A written limited appearance statement may be submitted to the
Board regarding this proceeding at any time. Such statements should be
sent to the Office of the Secretary using the methods prescribed above,
with a copy to the Licensing Board Chairman. A person who has already
filed a written limited appearance statement in this matter \7\ is not
required to resubmit it, but should notify the Board, as specified
above, if he or she wishes to make an oral statement during the June
sessions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Licensing Board Memorandum and Order (Scheduling
Prehearing Conference Call and Oral Argument) at 2-3 (October 1,
2004) (unpublished).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Notice of Evidentiary Hearing
In addition to the oral limited appearance statement sessions
discussed above, the public is notified that this Board subsequently
will conduct an evidentiary hearing on the four contentions admitted in
this proceeding. The hearing will be governed by the ``Informal Hearing
Procedures'' set forth in 10 CFR part, subparts C and L, see 10 CFR
2.300-2.390., 2.1200-2.1213, and is scheduled to take place during the
weeks of September 11, and October 16, 2006. Although the precise dates
and locations of the evidentiary hearings are yet to be determined, it
is the Commission's policy and practice to hold them in the general
vicinity of the site of the nuclear facility that is the subject of the
proceeding, so that members of the public may attend.\8\ See 10 CFR
2.328-2.329, 2.331. However, it appears that some of the contentions in
this proceeding involve some proprietary commercial information, which
would require that those portions of the evidentiary hearing be closed
to the general public, with only the authorized parties able to
attend.\9\ The current plan is to hold the evidentiary hearings in
Vermont, if possible, except for those portions of the proceeding that
may need to be closed to the public, which may be held at NRC
Headquarters in Rockville, Maryland. The Board will issue a subsequent
order establishing the exact dates, times, and locations for the
evidentiary hearing and copies of these rulings will be available to
the public at the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland,
and through the NRC Web site, https://www.nrc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Exelon Generation Co., LLC (Early Site Permit for
Clinton ESP Site), Licensing Board Memorandum and Order (Denying
Motion Requesting Reconsideration of Initial Prehearing Conference
Location) at 2-3 (April 5, 2004) (unpublished); 10 CFR part 2,
Appendix A, Sec. I(a) (2004), deleted Final Rule, Changes to
Adjudicatory Process, 69 FR 2182, 2274 (January 14, 2004).
\9\ In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, portions of a hearing may
be closed to the public if the matters at issue involve the
discussion of confidential or legally protected information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Availability of Documentary Information Regarding the Proceeding
Documents relating to this proceeding are available for public
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room or electronically
from the publicly available records component of NRC's Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible
from the NRC Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the
Public Electronic Reading Room). Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in
ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR reference staff by telephone at (800)
397-4209, (301) 415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
V. Scheduling Information Updates
Any updated/revised scheduling information regarding the
evidentiary hearing and limited appearance sessions can be found on the
NRC Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/public-meetings/
index.cfm or by calling (800) 368-5642, extension 5036, or (301) 415-
5036.
It is so ordered.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, April 10, 2006.
For the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Copies of this order were sent this date by Internet e-mail
transmission to the representatives for (1) licensees Entergy
Nuclear Vermont Yankee L.L.C. and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.;
(2) intervenors Vermont Department of Public Service and New England
Coalition of Brattleboro, Vermont; and (3) the Staff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alex S. Karlin,
Chairman, Administrative Judge.
[FR Doc. E6-5582 Filed 4-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P