Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records, 19197 [E6-5350]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 71 / Thursday, April 13, 2006 / Notices stakeholders when there are not or few evidence-based practices available.’’ Page 13143, Column 2—The APA Division 50 Committee on Evidencebased Practice suggested that SAMHSA develop ‘‘a comprehensive glossary that addresses definitions of different constituencies, populations, and settings.’’ Page 13144, Column 3—The APA Division 50 Committee on Evidencebased Practice recommended that SAMHSA ‘‘anticipate misuses of NREPP so as to insure that funding bodies do not mistakenly assume that improving treatment comes from confining treatment to a list of recommended techniques.’’ Page 13146, Columns 2—The APA Division 50 Committee on Evidencebased Practice suggested using a site glossary to define diagnostic terminology and client populations and communities. Dated: April 3, 2006. Charles G. Curie, Administrator. [FR Doc. 06–3538 Filed 4–12–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–M DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Office of the Secretary Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security. ACTION: Notice of removal of two Privacy Act systems of records. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the Department of Homeland Security is giving notice that it proposes to remove two systems of records from its inventory of record systems because they have become obsolete. DATES: Effective Date: April 13, 2006. HSRObinson on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maureen Cooney, Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security, 601 S. 12th Street, Arlington, VA 22202, by telephone (571) 227–3813 or facsimile (571) 227–4171. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and as part of its ongoing integration and management efforts, the Department of Homeland Security is removing two obsolete systems of records from its inventory of record systems. The first one is currently being maintained by United States Citizenship VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:20 Apr 12, 2006 Jkt 208001 and Immigration Services and was formerly maintained by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). This legacy record system is entitled ‘‘Designated Entity Information Management System (DEIMS),’’ last published in the Federal Register as ‘‘JUSTICE/INS–021,’’ (62 FR 39256), when the INS was still a part of the United States Department of Justice. The system became part of the DHS inventory of record systems upon creation of DHS and the merger with INS. This system was originally established in order to maintain records concerning individuals who applied for and received certification from INS to serve as designated fingerprint service providers. The record system is no longer needed, however, because the INS—and now DHS—no longer uses the services of designated fingerprint service providers. Instead, aliens applying for immigration benefits must have their fingerprints taken by DHS, by state and local law enforcement agencies, by consular offices of the Department of State, or by Department of Defense offices authorized to perform fingerprinting services. Therefore, JUSTICE/INS–021, the ‘‘Designated Entity Information Management System (DEIMS)’’ is obsolete and the Department of Homeland Security is removing this system from its inventory of Privacy Act systems. For similar reasons, DHS proposes to remove another legacy system of records that is now being maintained by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but which was formerly maintained by INS when it was part of the Department of Justice. This legacy record system is entitled ‘‘Job Exchange System (JOBX).’’ and it was last published as JUSTICE/INS–009 in the Federal Register on September 7, 2001 (66 FR 46815. JOBX was originally established in order to enable INS employees meeting specific criteria to trade like positions with other INS employees upon supervisor approval. The record system has become obsolete, however, as DHS no longer authorizes job swapping among employees. Therefore, the Department of Homeland Security is also removing JUSTICE/INS– 009 from its inventory of Privacy Act systems. Eliminating these two systems will have no adverse impacts on individuals, but will promote the overall streamlining and management of DHS Privacy Act record systems. PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 19197 Dated: April 4, 2006. Maureen Cooney, Acting Chief Privacy Officer. [FR Doc. E6–5350 Filed 4–12–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–10–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Bureau of Customs and Border Protection Proposed Collection; Comment Request Protest Notice and request for comments. ACTION: SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on an information collection requirement concerning the Protest. This request for comment is being made pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13; 44 U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)). DATES: Written comments should be received on or before June 12, 2006, to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Information Services Group, Room 3.2.C, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20229. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information should be directed to Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Attn.: Tracey Denning, Room 3.2.C, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20229, Tel. (202) 344– 1429. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CBP invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13; 44 U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)). The comments should address: (a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimates of the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden including the use of automated collection techniques or the use of other forms of information technology; and (e) estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operations, maintenance, and E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 71 (Thursday, April 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 19197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-5350]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Office of the Secretary


Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records

AGENCY: Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice of removal of two Privacy Act systems of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the Department of 
Homeland Security is giving notice that it proposes to remove two 
systems of records from its inventory of record systems because they 
have become obsolete.

DATES: Effective Date: April 13, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maureen Cooney, Acting Chief Privacy 
Officer, Department of Homeland Security, 601 S. 12th Street, 
Arlington, VA 22202, by telephone (571) 227-3813 or facsimile (571) 
227-4171.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy 
Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and as part of its ongoing integration and 
management efforts, the Department of Homeland Security is removing two 
obsolete systems of records from its inventory of record systems.
    The first one is currently being maintained by United States 
Citizenship and Immigration Services and was formerly maintained by the 
Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). This legacy record system 
is entitled ``Designated Entity Information Management System 
(DEIMS),'' last published in the Federal Register as ``JUSTICE/INS-
021,'' (62 FR 39256), when the INS was still a part of the United 
States Department of Justice. The system became part of the DHS 
inventory of record systems upon creation of DHS and the merger with 
INS.
    This system was originally established in order to maintain records 
concerning individuals who applied for and received certification from 
INS to serve as designated fingerprint service providers. The record 
system is no longer needed, however, because the INS--and now DHS--no 
longer uses the services of designated fingerprint service providers. 
Instead, aliens applying for immigration benefits must have their 
fingerprints taken by DHS, by state and local law enforcement agencies, 
by consular offices of the Department of State, or by Department of 
Defense offices authorized to perform fingerprinting services. 
Therefore, JUSTICE/INS-021, the ``Designated Entity Information 
Management System (DEIMS)'' is obsolete and the Department of Homeland 
Security is removing this system from its inventory of Privacy Act 
systems.
    For similar reasons, DHS proposes to remove another legacy system 
of records that is now being maintained by the Bureau of Immigration 
and Customs Enforcement, but which was formerly maintained by INS when 
it was part of the Department of Justice. This legacy record system is 
entitled ``Job Exchange System (JOBX).'' and it was last published as 
JUSTICE/INS-009 in the Federal Register on September 7, 2001 (66 FR 
46815. JOBX was originally established in order to enable INS employees 
meeting specific criteria to trade like positions with other INS 
employees upon supervisor approval. The record system has become 
obsolete, however, as DHS no longer authorizes job swapping among 
employees. Therefore, the Department of Homeland Security is also 
removing JUSTICE/INS-009 from its inventory of Privacy Act systems.
    Eliminating these two systems will have no adverse impacts on 
individuals, but will promote the overall streamlining and management 
of DHS Privacy Act record systems.

    Dated: April 4, 2006.
Maureen Cooney,
Acting Chief Privacy Officer.
 [FR Doc. E6-5350 Filed 4-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.