Safety Zone; Maple-Oregon Bridge Boring Program, Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal, Sturgeon Bay, WI, 19119-19121 [06-3512]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 71 / Thursday, April 13, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD11–06–003]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Carquinez Strait, Benicia and Martinez,
CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
HSRObinson on PROD1PC61 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, Eleventh
Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation
governing the operation of the BeniciaMartinez Railroad Drawbridge across
the Carquinez Strait, mile 7.0, between
Benicia and Martinez, CA. This
deviation allows the bridge to remain in
the closed-to-navigation position during
the deviation period. This deviation is
necessary for the bridge owner, Union
Pacific Railroad Company, to perform
essential cable replacement and repair
work at the bridge.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
7 a.m. on April 17, 2006 to 5 p.m. on
April 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this
document are available for inspection or
copying at Commander (dpw), Eleventh
Coast Guard District, Building 50–3,
Coast Guard Island, Alameda, CA
94501–5100, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Bridge Section office
maintains the public docket for this
temporary deviation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David H. Sulouff, Chief, Bridge Section,
Eleventh Coast Guard District,
telephone (510) 437–3516.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
13, 2006, the Union Pacific Railroad
Company requested a temporary change
to the operation of the Benicia-Martinez
Railroad Drawbridge, mile 7.0,
Carquinez Strait, between Benicia and
Martinez, CA. The Benicia-Martinez
Railroad Drawbridge navigation span
provides vertical clearance of 70 feet
above Mean High Water in the closedto-navigation position. Presently, the
draw opens on signal as required by 33
CFR 117.5. Navigation on the waterway
consists of both commercial and
recreational watercraft. The Union
Pacific Railroad Company requested the
drawbridge be allowed to remain closed
to navigation from 7 a.m. on April 17,
2006 to 5 p.m. on April 21, 2006. During
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:13 Apr 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
this time replacement and repair to the
bridge cables, and associated
maintenance on the lift assembly, will
occur. This temporary drawbridge
deviation has been coordinated with the
waterway users. No objections to the
proposed temporary rule were raised.
Vessels can pass underneath the bridge
in the closed position. The drawbridge
can open in an emergency upon five
hours advance notice.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c),
this work will be performed with all due
speed in order to return the drawbridge
to normal operation as soon as possible.
This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR
117.35.
Dated: March 30, 2006.
Robert C. Lorigan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 06–3562 Filed 4–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09–06–017]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Maple-Oregon Bridge
Boring Program, Sturgeon Bay Ship
Canal, Sturgeon Bay, WI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal in
Sturgeon Bay, WI. This zone is intended
to restrict vessels from a portion of the
Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal during the
Maple-Oregon Bridge Boring Program.
This temporary safety zone is necessary
to protect vessels from hazards
associated with underwater drilling
operations.
This rule is effective from 5:30
a.m. (local), March 30, 2006 until 10
p.m. (local), April 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket [CGD09–06–017] and are
available for inspection or copying at
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan,
2420 S. Lincoln Memorial Dr,
Milwaukee, WI, 53207 between 7 a.m.
(local) and 3:30 p.m. (local), Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19119
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chief Warrant Officer Brad Hinken, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, at
(414) 747–7154.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. The permit
application was not received in time to
publish an NPRM followed by a final
rule before the effective date. Under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying this rule would be
contrary to the public interest of
ensuring the safety and vessels during
this event and immediate action is
necessary to prevent possible loss of life
or property. The Coast Guard has not
received any complaints or negative
comments previously with regard to this
event.
Background and Purpose
This safety zone is necessary to
ensure the safety of vessels transiting
the Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal and the
workers on the Teng and Associates
Drilling Barge Configuration. Based on
accidents that have occurred in other
Captain of the Port zones, and the
hazards associated with underwater
drilling, the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan has determined underwater
drilling operations in close proximity to
vessel traffic pose significant risk to
public safety and property. Establishing
a safety zone to control vessel
movement around the location of the
Teng and Associates Drilling Barge
Configuration will help ensure the
safety of persons and property during
these operations and help minimize the
associated risks.
Discussion of Rule
A temporary safety zone is necessary
to ensure the safety of vessels transiting
the Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal and
workers on the Teng and Associates
Drilling Barge Configuration. The safety
zone will be in effect from 5:30 a.m.
(local), March 30, 2006 until 10 p.m.
(local), April 28, 2006.
The safety zone will encompass all
waters of the Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal
within 50-ft of the Teng and Associates
Drilling Barge Configuration. The
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, or
his designated on-scene representative,
has the authority to terminate the event.
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Captain of
the Port Lake Michigan or the
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
19120
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 71 / Thursday, April 13, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
designated on-scene representative.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan or his designated
on-scene representative. The Captain of
the Port or his designated representative
may be contacted at the Sector Lake
Michigan Command Center via landline
at 414–747–7182 or via VHF Channel
16.
HSRObinson on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the
minimal time that vessels will be
restricted from the zone and the zone is
an area where the Coast Guard expects
insignificant adverse impact to mariners
from the zone’s activation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners and operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of the Sturgeon Bay Ship
Canal approximately 700 ft. south of the
Michigan Avenue Bridge in Sturgeon
Bay, WI on each day from March 30th
and April 28th, 2006.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This rule will be
in effect when there is little to no
recreational and commercial vessel
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:13 Apr 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
traffic. In the event that this temporary
safety zone affects shipping, commercial
vessels may request permission from the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to
transit through the safety zone. The
Coast Guard will give notice to the
public via a Broadcast to Mariners that
the regulation is in effect.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process. Small businesses may send
comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise
determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement
Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards.
The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule would not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedure; and related management
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 71 / Thursday, April 13, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
system practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical
exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, we believe that
this rule should be categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This
event establishes a safety zone therefore
paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction
applies.
A preliminary ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ is available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. Comments on this section
will be considered before we make the
final decision on whether the rule
should be categorically excluded from
further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in section 165.23
of this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or his designated onscene representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer who has been designated by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port will be aboard either
a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel. The Captain of the Port or his
designated on-scene representative may
be contacted by calling the Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan Command Center
at 414–747–7182 or VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan to obtain permission to do so.
Vessel operators given permission to
enter or operate in the safety zone shall
comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or his on-scene representative.
Dated: March 30, 2006.
S.P. LaRochelle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 06–3512 Filed 4–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
33 CFR Part 165
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107–
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1
[CGD17–05–002]
I
I 2. A new temporary section 165.T09–
017 is added as follows:
HSRObinson on PROD1PC61 with RULES
§ 165.T09–017 Safety zone; Maple-Oregon
Bridge Boring Program, Sturgeon Bay Ship
Canal, Sturgeon Bay, WI.
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: All waters of the
Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal within 50-ft of
the drilling rig.
(b) Effective period. This rule is
effective from 5:30 a.m. (local), March
30, 2006 until 10 p.m. (local), April 28,
2006. This zone will be enforced during
the entire effective period.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:13 Apr 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; High Capacity
Passenger Vessels and Alaska Marine
Highway System Vessels in Alaska
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing permanent moving security
zones around all escorted High Capacity
Passenger Vessels (‘‘HCPV’’) and
escorted Alaska Marine Highway
System Vessels (‘‘AMHS vessels’’)
during their transits in the navigable
waters of the Seventeenth Coast Guard
District. All commercial fishing vessels,
as defined by applicable United States
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19121
Code, are exempt from the provisions of
this rule only while they are actively
engaged in fishing.
DATES: This final rule is effective May
15, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket are part
of docket CGD17–05–002 and are
available for inspection or copying at
United States Coast Guard, District 17
(dpi), 709 West 9th Street, Juneau, AK
99801 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT
Matthew York, District 17 (dpi), 709
West 9th Street, Juneau, AK 99801,
(907) 463–2821.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On March 9, 2005, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled ‘‘Regulated Navigation Area and
Security Zones; High Capacity
Passenger Vessels in Alaska’’ in the
Federal Register (70 FR 11595), docket
number CGD17–05–002. The NPRM
included provisions for a 250-yard
speed restriction zone, a 25-yard
security zone around moored and
anchored vessels, and a waiver request
process.
On October 31, 2005, we published a
Supplemental Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (SNPRM) entitled ‘‘Security
Zone; High Capacity Passenger Vessels
and Alaska Marine Highway System
Vessels in Alaska’’ in the Federal
Register (70 FR 62261), docket number
CGD17–05–002. The SNRPM removed
those three provisions from the
proposed rule. The revised proposed
security zone was then limited to High
Capacity Passenger Vessels (HCPV) and
Alaska Marine Highway System Vessels
(AMHS) vessels during transit in the
waters of the Seventeenth Coast Guard
District. The SNRPM proposed the
security zones would only apply to
HCPV and AMHS vessels transiting
under an escort as defined in the
SNPRM. These permanent security
zones were carefully designed to
minimally impact the public while
providing protections for HCPV and
AMHS vessels.
On February 28, 2006, the Coast
Guard published a Second
Supplemental Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (SSNPRM) entitled,
‘‘Security Zone; High Capacity
Passenger Vessels and Alaska Marine
Highway System Vessels in Alaska’’ in
the Federal Register (71 FR 9984),
docket number CGD17–05–002. The
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 71 (Thursday, April 13, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19119-19121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3512]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09-06-017]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Maple-Oregon Bridge Boring Program, Sturgeon Bay
Ship Canal, Sturgeon Bay, WI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal in Sturgeon Bay, WI. This zone is intended to
restrict vessels from a portion of the Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal during
the Maple-Oregon Bridge Boring Program. This temporary safety zone is
necessary to protect vessels from hazards associated with underwater
drilling operations.
DATES: This rule is effective from 5:30 a.m. (local), March 30, 2006
until 10 p.m. (local), April 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket [CGD09-06-017] and are available for inspection or
copying at U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, 2420 S. Lincoln
Memorial Dr, Milwaukee, WI, 53207 between 7 a.m. (local) and 3:30 p.m.
(local), Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief Warrant Officer Brad Hinken,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, at (414) 747-7154.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. The permit application was not
received in time to publish an NPRM followed by a final rule before the
effective date. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), good cause exists for making
this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying this rule would be contrary to the public interest
of ensuring the safety and vessels during this event and immediate
action is necessary to prevent possible loss of life or property. The
Coast Guard has not received any complaints or negative comments
previously with regard to this event.
Background and Purpose
This safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of vessels
transiting the Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal and the workers on the Teng and
Associates Drilling Barge Configuration. Based on accidents that have
occurred in other Captain of the Port zones, and the hazards associated
with underwater drilling, the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan has
determined underwater drilling operations in close proximity to vessel
traffic pose significant risk to public safety and property.
Establishing a safety zone to control vessel movement around the
location of the Teng and Associates Drilling Barge Configuration will
help ensure the safety of persons and property during these operations
and help minimize the associated risks.
Discussion of Rule
A temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
vessels transiting the Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal and workers on the Teng
and Associates Drilling Barge Configuration. The safety zone will be in
effect from 5:30 a.m. (local), March 30, 2006 until 10 p.m. (local),
April 28, 2006.
The safety zone will encompass all waters of the Sturgeon Bay Ship
Canal within 50-ft of the Teng and Associates Drilling Barge
Configuration. The Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, or his designated
on-scene representative, has the authority to terminate the event.
All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or the
[[Page 19120]]
designated on-scene representative. Entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or his designated on-scene
representative. The Captain of the Port or his designated
representative may be contacted at the Sector Lake Michigan Command
Center via landline at 414-747-7182 or via VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the minimal time that vessels will
be restricted from the zone and the zone is an area where the Coast
Guard expects insignificant adverse impact to mariners from the zone's
activation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners and operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of the Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal
approximately 700 ft. south of the Michigan Avenue Bridge in Sturgeon
Bay, WI on each day from March 30th and April 28th, 2006.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
rule will be in effect when there is little to no recreational and
commercial vessel traffic. In the event that this temporary safety zone
affects shipping, commercial vessels may request permission from the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to transit through the safety zone.
The Coast Guard will give notice to the public via a Broadcast to
Mariners that the regulation is in effect.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small
businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and
the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness
to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of
the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule would not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedure; and related management
[[Page 19121]]
system practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that there are no factors in this
case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, we believe that this rule should
be categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental documentation. This event
establishes a safety zone therefore paragraph (34)(g) of the
Instruction applies.
A preliminary ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' is available in
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. Comments on this section
will be considered before we make the final decision on whether the
rule should be categorically excluded from further environmental
review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1
0
2. A new temporary section 165.T09-017 is added as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-017 Safety zone; Maple-Oregon Bridge Boring Program,
Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal, Sturgeon Bay, WI.
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All
waters of the Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal within 50-ft of the drilling rig.
(b) Effective period. This rule is effective from 5:30 a.m.
(local), March 30, 2006 until 10 p.m. (local), April 28, 2006. This
zone will be enforced during the entire effective period.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Lake Michigan, or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or his designated
on-scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-
scene representative of the Captain of the Port will be aboard either a
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on-scene representative may be contacted by calling the
Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan Command Center at 414-747-7182 or VHF
Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone shall comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: March 30, 2006.
S.P. LaRochelle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 06-3512 Filed 4-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P