Approval of the Clean Air Act, Section 112(l), Authority for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Perchloroethylene Air Emission Standards for Dry Cleaning Facilities: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, 19126-19127 [06-3488]
Download as PDF
19126
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 71 / Thursday, April 13, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by June 12, 2006. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Dated: March 31, 2006.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52, is amended as
follows:
I
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart (RR)—(Tennessee)
2. Section 52.2220(c) is amended by
revising the entry for ‘‘Section 1200–3–
18–.01’’ to read as follows:
I
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
§ 52.220(c).
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED (TENNESSEE) REGULATIONS
State citation
Title/subject
*
*
1200–3–18–.01 .........................................
*
*
Definitions .................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Adoption date
*
On
September 16, 2002 (67 FR 58339), EPA
published a final rulemaking action
granting the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts the authority to
implement and enforce its
perchloroethylene air emissions
regulations. In that document, EPA
incorrectly cited the wrong
Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection rule. This
action corrects the typographical error.
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B),
provides that, when an agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. We
have determined that there is good
cause for making today’s rule final
without prior proposal and opportunity
for comment because we are merely
correcting an incorrect citation in a
previous action. Thus, notice and public
procedure are unnecessary. We find that
this constitutes good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–R01–OAR–2006–0277; FRL–8157–9]
Approval of the Clean Air Act, Section
112(l), Authority for Hazardous Air
Pollutants: Perchloroethylene Air
Emission Standards for Dry Cleaning
Facilities: Commonwealth of
Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
Direct final rule; correcting
amendment.
HSRObinson on PROD1PC61 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document corrects an
error in the language of a final rule
pertaining to EPA’s approval granting
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
the authority to implement and enforce
its perchloroethylene air emissions
regulations in place of the Federal dry
cleaning NESHAP for area sources.
DATES: Effective April 13, 2006.
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
*
04/13/06
*
John
Courcier, at (617) 918–1659 or by e-mail
at courcier.john@epa.gov.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
14:13 Apr 12, 2006
09/01/99
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 06–3490 Filed 4–12–06; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
EPA approval
date
Sfmt 4700
*
Federal Register
notice
*
[Insert first page of
publication]
*
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
is therefore not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)). Because the agency has made
a ‘‘good cause’’ finding that this action
is not subject to notice-and-comment
requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as
indicated in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section above, it is not
subject to the regulatory flexibility
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), or to sections
202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments or impose a significant
intergovernmental mandate, as
described in sections 203 and 204 of
UMRA. This rule also does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
HSRObinson on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 71 / Thursday, April 13, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on
the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of governments, as specified by
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
This technical correction action does
not involve technical standards; thus
the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The rule also
does not involve special consideration
of environmental justice related issues
as required by Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In
issuing this rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct, as
required by section 3 of Executive Order
12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996).
EPA has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the executive
order. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 808 allows
the issuing agency to make a rule
effective sooner than otherwise
provided by the CRA if the agency
makes a good cause finding that notice
and public procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. This determination must be
supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C.
808(2). As stated previously, EPA had
made such a good cause finding,
including the reasons therefore, and
established an effective date of April 13,
2006. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:13 Apr 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This correction to
the rule (310 CMR 7.26) for
Massachusetts is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Hazardous substances,
Incorporation by reference, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 3, 2006.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
I
40 CFR part 63 is amended as follows:
PART 63—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart E—[Amended]
2. Section 63.99 is amended to correct
paragraph (a)(21)(ii)(A) to read as
follows:
I
§ 63.99
Delegated Federal authorities.
(a) * * *
(21) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) The material incorporated in the
Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection 310 CMR 7.26
and 310 CMR 70.01 pertaining to dry
cleaning facilities in the Commonwealth
of Massachusetts jurisdiction, and has
been approved under the procedures in
§ 63.93 to be implemented and enforced
in place of the Federal NESHAPs for
Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning
Facilities (subpart M of this part) for
area sources only, as defined in
§ 63.320(h).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 06–3488 Filed 4–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
43 CFR Part 5
RIN 1093–AA10
Making Pictures, Television
Productions, or Sound Tracks on
Certain Areas Under the Jurisdiction of
the Department of the Interior
Office of the Secretary, Interior.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19127
SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary is
revising regulations found at 43 CFR 5.1
to allow implementation of legislation
that directs the establishment of a
reasonable fee for commercial filming
activities or similar projects and still
photography where a permit is required.
DATES: Effective Date: April 13, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee
Dickinson, Special Park Uses Program
Manager, National Park Service, 1849 C
Street, NW., ORG CODE 2460,
Washington, DC 20240, telephone: 202–
513–7092, or e-mail:
Lee_Dickinson@nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public
Law 106–206 (codified at 16 U.S.C.
460l–6d) directs the Secretaries of the
Interior and Agriculture to establish a
reasonable fee system (referred to as a
location fee in this publication) for
commercial filming and still
photography activities on lands under
the Secretaries’ jurisdiction.
The Department of the Interior (DOI)
regulations at 43 CFR part 5 prohibit the
National Park Service (NPS) from
collecting fees ‘‘for the making of
motion pictures, television productions
or sound tracks * * * ’’. The Office of
the Secretary is revising the current
regulation by removing the prohibition.
Background
Lands of the United States were set
aside by Congress or the Executive
Branch to conserve and protect areas of
untold beauty and grandeur, historical
importance, and uniqueness for future
generations. Often it is the uniqueness
of the land that attracts filmmakers. This
tradition started with explorers who
traveled with paint and canvas or
primitive photo apparatus before the
areas were designated as a national
park, wildlife refuge, or forest.
Generally, land management agencies
allow commercial filming and still
photography when it is consistent with
their mission and will not harm the
resource or interfere with the visitor
experience.
While many commercial filming and
still photography permits issued by the
land management agencies are for small
productions involving educational
material or commercial advertising, a
significant number of commercial
filming permits have been issued to
makers of major motion pictures.
Public Law 106–206 specifically
requires permits, reasonable fees for use
of federal lands and reimbursement of
costs incurred by the government as a
result of both commercial filming and
certain still photography activities.
Congress recognized in this law that
when commercial filming and certain
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 71 (Thursday, April 13, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19126-19127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3488]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA-R01-OAR-2006-0277; FRL-8157-9]
Approval of the Clean Air Act, Section 112(l), Authority for
Hazardous Air Pollutants: Perchloroethylene Air Emission Standards for
Dry Cleaning Facilities: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects an error in the language of a final
rule pertaining to EPA's approval granting the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts the authority to implement and enforce its
perchloroethylene air emissions regulations in place of the Federal dry
cleaning NESHAP for area sources.
DATES: Effective April 13, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Courcier, at (617) 918-1659 or by
e-mail at courcier.john@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 16, 2002 (67 FR 58339), EPA
published a final rulemaking action granting the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts the authority to implement and enforce its
perchloroethylene air emissions regulations. In that document, EPA
incorrectly cited the wrong Massachusetts Department of Environmental
Protection rule. This action corrects the typographical error.
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have determined that
there is good cause for making today's rule final without prior
proposal and opportunity for comment because we are merely correcting
an incorrect citation in a previous action. Thus, notice and public
procedure are unnecessary. We find that this constitutes good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)). Because
the agency has made a ``good cause'' finding that this action is not
subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as indicated in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section above, it is not subject to the regulatory
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.), or to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments or impose a
significant intergovernmental mandate, as described in sections 203 and
204 of UMRA. This rule also does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the
[[Page 19127]]
Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of governments, as specified
by Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This rule also
is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically significant.
This technical correction action does not involve technical
standards; thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. The rule also does not involve special consideration of
environmental justice related issues as required by Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In issuing this rule, EPA has
taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity,
minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, as required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996). EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630
(53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings'' issued under the executive order. This rule does not impose
an information collection burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
As stated previously, EPA had made such a good cause finding, including
the reasons therefore, and established an effective date of April 13,
2006. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This correction to the rule (310 CMR
7.26) for Massachusetts is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Hazardous
substances, Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: April 3, 2006.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
0
40 CFR part 63 is amended as follows:
PART 63--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart E--[Amended]
0
2. Section 63.99 is amended to correct paragraph (a)(21)(ii)(A) to read
as follows:
Sec. 63.99 Delegated Federal authorities.
(a) * * *
(21) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) The material incorporated in the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection 310 CMR 7.26 and 310 CMR 70.01 pertaining to
dry cleaning facilities in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
jurisdiction, and has been approved under the procedures in Sec. 63.93
to be implemented and enforced in place of the Federal NESHAPs for
Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Facilities (subpart M of this part) for
area sources only, as defined in Sec. 63.320(h).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 06-3488 Filed 4-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P