Medicare Program; Medicare Graduate Medical Education Affiliation Provisions for Teaching Hospitals in Certain Emergency Situations, 18654-18667 [06-3492]
Download as PDF
18654
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
PART 799—AMENDED
1. The authority citation for part 799
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2603, 2611, 2625.
2. Amend §799.5115 by revising the
first sentence of paragraph (h)(5)(vii)(A)
in § 799.5115 to read as follows and by
removing the entry ‘‘CAS No. 77–78–1
Dimethyl sulfate’’ in Table 2 of
paragraph (j) in § 799.5115.
I
§ 799.5115 Chemical testing requirements
for certain chemicals of interest to the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(5) * * *
(vii) * * *
(A) Kp. A Kp must be determined for
each test chemical, except for methyl
isoamyl ketone (MIAK; CAS No.: 110–
12–3, Chemical Abstracts (CA) Index
Name: 2-Hexanone, 5-methoxy-) and
dipropylene glycol methyl ether
(DPGME; CAS No.: 34590–94–8, CA
Index Name: Propanol, 1(or 2)-(2methoxymethylethoxy)-). * * *
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 06–3491 Filed 4–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Parts 412 and 413
[CMS–1531–IFC]
RIN 0938–AO35
Medicare Program; Medicare Graduate
Medical Education Affiliation
Provisions for Teaching Hospitals in
Certain Emergency Situations
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Interim final rule with comment
period.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This interim final rule with
comment period will modify the current
Graduate Medical Education (GME)
regulations as they apply to Medicare
GME affiliations to provide for greater
flexibility during times of disaster.
Specifically, this rule will implement
the emergency Medicare GME affiliated
group provisions that will address
issues that may be faced by certain
teaching hospitals in the event that
residents who would otherwise have
trained at a hospital in an emergency
area (as that term is defined in section
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
1135(g) of the Social Security Act (the
Act)) are relocated to alternate training
sites.
DATES: This interim final rule is
effective as of August 29, 2005.
Comment date: To be assured
consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses
provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on
June 12, 2006.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–1531–IFC. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (no duplicates, please):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on specific issues
in this regulation to https://
www.cms.hhs.gov/eRulemaking. Click
on the link ‘‘Submit electronic
comments on CMS regulations with an
open comment period.’’ (Attachments
should be in Microsoft Word,
WordPerfect, or Excel; however, we
prefer Microsoft Word.)
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments (one original and two
copies) to the following address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS–1531–
IFC, P.O. Box 8011, Baltimore, MD
21244–8011.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments (one
original and two copies) to the following
address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS–1531–
IFC, Mail Stop C4–26–05, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments (one original
and two copies) before the close of the
comment period to one of the following
addresses. If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786–
9994 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Room 445–G, Hubert H. Humphrey
Building, 200 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20201; or 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244–1850.
(Because access to the interior of the
HHH Building is not readily available to
persons without Federal Government
identification, commenters are
encouraged to leave their comments in
the CMS drop slots located in the main
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
lobby of the building. A stamp-in clock
is available for persons wishing to retain
a proof of filing by stamping in and
retaining an extra copy of the comments
being filed.)
Comments mailed to the addresses
indicated as appropriate for hand or
courier delivery may be delayed and
received after the comment period.
Submission of comments on
paperwork requirements. You may
submit comments on this document’s
paperwork requirements by mailing
your comments to the addresses
provided at the end of the ‘‘Collection
of Information Requirements’’ section in
this document.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Truong, (410) 786–6005.
Renate Rockwell, (410) 786–4645.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Submitting Comments: We welcome
comments from the public on all issues
set forth in this rule to assist us in fully
considering issues and developing
policies. You can assist us by
referencing the file code CMS–1531–IFC
and the specific ‘‘issue identifier’’ that
precedes the section on which you
choose to comment.
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://www.cms.hhs.gov/
eRulemaking. Click on the link
‘‘Electronic Comments on CMS
Regulations’’ on that Web site to view
public comments.
Comments received timely will be
also available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
approximately three weeks after
publication of a document, at the
headquarters of the Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244,
Monday through Friday of each week
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–743–3951.
I. Background
[If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘BACKGROUND’’ at the
beginning of your comments.]
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
A. Legislative Authority
The stated purpose of section 1135 of
the Act is to enable the Secretary to
ensure, to the maximum extent feasible,
in any emergency area and during an
emergency period, that sufficient health
care items and services are available to
meet the needs of enrollees in Medicare,
Medicaid, and the State Children’s
Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).
Section 1135 of the Act authorizes the
Secretary, to the extent necessary to
accomplish the statutory purpose, to
temporarily waive or modify the
application of certain types of statutory
and regulatory provisions (such as
conditions of participation or other
certification requirements, program
participation or similar requirements, or
pre-approval requirements) with respect
to health care items and services
furnished by health care provider(s) in
an emergency area during an emergency
period.
The Secretary’s authority under
section 1135 of the Act arises in the
event there is an ‘‘emergency area’’ and
continues during an ‘‘emergency
period’’ as those terms are defined in
the statute. Under section 1135(g) of the
Act, an emergency area is a geographic
area in which there exists an emergency
or disaster that is declared by the
President according to the National
Emergencies Act or the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act, and a public health
emergency declared by the Secretary
according to section 319 of the Public
Health Service Act. (Section 319 of the
Public Health Service Act authorizes the
Secretary to declare a public health
emergency and take the appropriate
action to respond to the emergency,
consistent with existing authorities.)
Throughout the remainder of this
discussion, we will refer to such
emergency areas and emergency periods
as ‘‘section 1135’’ emergency areas and
emergency periods.
Section 1871(e)(1)(A) of the Act, as
amended by section 903(a)(1) of the
Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement, and Modernization Act of
2003 (MMA) (Pub. L. 108–173),
generally prohibits the Secretary from
making retroactive substantive changes
in policy unless retroactive application
of the change is necessary to comply
with statutory requirements, or failure
to apply the change retroactively would
be contrary to the public interest. Due
to the infrastructure damage and
disruption of operations experienced by
medical facilities, and the consequent
disruption in residency training, caused
by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005,
there is urgent need for the regulation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
changes provided in this interim final
rule with comment period to be applied
retroactively. Existing regulations do not
adequately address the issues faced by
hospitals that are located in the
emergency areas addressed in this rule,
or hospitals that assisted by training
displaced residents from the emergency
area. We believe failure to apply the
regulatory changes retroactively would
be contrary to the public interest
because hospitals affected by Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita could otherwise face
dramatic financial hardship and impede
the recovery of graduate medical
education programs in the emergency
area.
Specifically, the training programs at
many teaching hospitals in New Orleans
and surrounding areas were temporarily
closed in the aftermath of the
hurricanes, and the displaced residents
were transferred to other hospitals to
continue their training programs in
other parts of the country. While many
residents will likely be able to return to
the hurricane-affected hospitals after
some period of time, others may need to
remain where they have been
transferred for an extended period of
time. A regulatory change is required so
that Medicare graduate medical
education (GME) funding can be
maintained while there are displaced
residents training at various hospitals
outside of the emergency area even as
the hurricane-affected hospitals
incrementally bring residents back in
the process of rebuilding their training
programs.
Under section 1886(h) of the Act, as
amended by section 9202 of the
Consolidated Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act (COBRA) of 1985
(Pub. L. 99–272), the Secretary is
authorized to make payments to
hospitals for the direct costs of
approved GME programs. Section
1886(d)(5)(B) of the Act provides that
prospective payment hospitals that have
residents in an approved GME program
receive an additional payment for a
Medicare discharge to reflect the higher
patient care costs of teaching hospitals,
that is, the indirect graduate medical
education (IME) costs. Sections
1886(h)(4)(F) and 1886(d)(5)(B)(v) of the
Act established limits on the number of
allopathic and osteopathic residents that
hospitals may count for purposes of
calculating direct GME payments and
the IME adjustment, respectively,
thereby establishing hospital-specific
direct GME and IME full-time
equivalent (FTE) resident caps.
However, under the authority granted
by section 1886(h)(4)(H)(ii) of the Act,
the Secretary may issue rules to allow
institutions that are members of the
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18655
same affiliated group to apply their
direct GME and IME FTE resident caps
on an aggregate basis through a
Medicare GME affiliation agreement.
The Secretary’s regulations permit
hospitals, through a Medicare GME
affiliation agreement, to adjust IME and
direct GME FTE resident caps to reflect
the rotation of residents among affiliated
hospitals. The current regulation at
§ 413.75(b), implementing Medicare
GME affiliations, specifies that hospitals
may only form a Medicare GME
affiliated group with other hospitals if
they are in the same or contiguous
urban or rural areas, if they are under
common ownership, or if they are
jointly listed as program sponsors or
major participating institutions in the
same program. The existing regulations
do not provide for hospitals whose
residency programs have been disrupted
in an emergency area to enter into valid
Medicare GME affiliation agreements
with host hospitals where the hospitals
may not meet the regulatory
requirements for Medicare GME
affiliations. Therefore, through this
interim final rule with comment period,
we are supplementing the regulations at
§ 413.75(b) and § 413.79(f) with
provisions for emergency Medicare
GME affiliated groups to provide relief
to hospitals with disrupted residency
programs in an emergency area. These
provisions are being made effective
retroactive to August 29, 2005.
B. Overview of Medicare Direct GME
and IME
As we discussed in the previous
section, the Medicare program makes
payments to teaching hospitals to
account for two types of costs, the direct
costs (direct GME) and the indirect costs
(IME) of a hospital’s graduate medical
education program. Direct GME
payments represent the direct costs of
training residents (for example, resident
salaries, fringe benefits, and teaching
physician costs associated with an
approved GME program) and generally
are calculated by determining the
product of the Medicare patient load
(that is, the percentage of the hospital’s
Medicare inpatient days), the hospital’s
per resident payment amount, and the
weighted number of FTE residents
training at the hospital during the cost
reporting period.
The IME adjustment is made to
teaching hospitals for the additional
indirect patient care costs attributable to
teaching activities. For example,
teaching hospitals typically offer more
technologically advanced treatments to
their patients, and therefore, patients
who are sicker and need more
sophisticated treatment are more likely
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
18656
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
to go to teaching hospitals. Furthermore,
there are additional costs related to the
presence of inefficiencies associated
with teaching residents resulting from
the additional tests or procedures
ordered by residents and the demands
put on physicians who supervise, and
staff who support, the residents. IME
payments are made as a percentage addon adjustment to the per discharge
Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment
System (IPPS) payment, and are
calculated based on the hospital’s ratio
of FTE residents to available beds as
defined at § 412.105(b). The statutory
formula for calculating the IME
adjustment is: c × [(1 + r).405 ¥ 1],
where ‘‘r’’ represents the hospital’s ratio
of FTE residents to beds, and ‘‘c’’
represents an IME multiplier, which is
set by the Congress.
The amount of IME payment a
hospital receives for a particular
discharge is dependent upon the
number of FTE residents the hospital
trains, the hospital’s number of
available beds, the current level of the
statutory IME multiplier, and the per
discharge IPPS payment. Sections
1886(d)(5)(B)(v) and 1886(h)(4)(F) of the
Act established hospital specific limits
(that is, caps) on the number of
allopathic and osteopathic FTE
residents that hospitals may count for
purposes of calculating indirect and
direct GME payments, respectively.
C. Effect of Existing Regulations
As explained above, the Secretary’s
authority under section 1135 of the Act
is prompted by the occurrence of an
emergency or disaster that leads to
designation of a section 1135 emergency
area, and continues throughout a section
1135 emergency period. For example,
when Hurricane Katrina occurred on
August 29, 2005, disrupting health care
operations and medical residency
training programs at teaching hospitals
in New Orleans and the surrounding
area, the conditions were met for an
emergency area and emergency period
under section 1135(g) of the Act. Under
section 1135 of the Act, the Secretary
was then authorized to waive a number
of provisions to ensure that sufficient
services would be available in the
section 1135 emergency area to meet the
needs of Medicare, Medicaid, and
SCHIP patients. Shortly after Hurricane
Katrina occurred, we were informed by
hospitals in New Orleans that the
training programs at many teaching
hospitals in the city were closed as a
result of the disaster and that the
displaced residents were being
transferred to training programs at host
hospitals in other parts of the country.
For purpose of discussion in this rule,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
a host hospital is a hospital that trains
residents displaced from a training
program in a section 1135 emergency
area. A home hospital is a hospital that
meets all of the following: (1) Is located
in a section 1135 emergency area (2) had
its inpatient bed occupancy decreased
by 20 percent or more due to the
disaster so that it is unable to train the
number of residents it originally
intended to train in that academic year,
and (3) needs to send the displaced
residents to train at a host hospital.
Immediately after Hurricane Katrina,
home and host hospitals petitioned
CMS for a mechanism to allow host
hospitals to count the displaced FTE
residents they would be training for
direct GME and IME payment purposes.
In response to the petitions, we
immediately issued a Question and
Answer (Q&A), which cited provisions
in existing regulations at § 413.79(h).
Section 413.79(h) allows home hospitals
that closed, or closed one or more
residency training programs, to
temporarily transfer FTE residents to
host hospitals and allows host hospitals
that were already training residents at or
above their FTE resident caps to count
those displaced residents for direct GME
and IME payment (see the CMS Q&A’s
Web site: https://questions.cms.hhs.gov
(the Web site link is located at ID 5696)).
As specified at § 413.79(h), Medicare
considers a program at a hospital to be
closed if ‘‘* * * the hospital ceases to
offer training for residents in a
particular approved medical residency
training program.’’ Section 413.79(h)
also defines closure of a hospital as
when a hospital ‘‘* * * terminates its
Medicare agreement under the
provisions of § 489.52 * * *.’’ The
regulations at § 413.79(h) allow a host
hospital that accepts residents from the
closed program to receive a temporary
increase in its IME and direct GME
resident caps for those residents as long
as the home hospital agrees to a
corresponding temporary reduction to
its own caps. The host hospital under
the closed program provisions would
receive temporary FTE resident cap
adjustments only as long as the specific
resident(s) is displaced (and only as
long as the home hospital or home
hospital’s program remains closed).
Therefore, once the resident(s)
completes training in the program that
he or she was training in when the
program closed, or he or she returns to
train at the home hospital, no additional
FTE resident cap adjustments for the
host hospital are permitted under
§ 413.79(h). Furthermore, § 413.79(h)
specifies that a host hospital can receive
a temporary increase in its FTE resident
caps in order to count displaced FTE
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
residents only if the proper
documentation is submitted to the fiscal
intermediaries (FIs) by both the home
and host hospital no later than 60 days
after the host hospital begins to train the
displaced resident(s).
In accordance with the authority
granted to the Secretary under section
1135 of the Act, as stated in our Q&A
posted on the CMS Web site, we
extended the regulatory 60-day deadline
for submitting documentation to CMS as
required by § 413.79(h) and thus
allowed hospitals to submit the
documentation by the earlier of the end
of the section 1135 emergency period
granted for Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
or by June 30, 2006. The section 1135
emergency period ended on January 31,
2006. We believe the existing regulation
at § 413.79(h) addressed the issue of
finding host hospitals for residents
displaced from home hospitals in the
immediate aftermath of Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita. However, teaching
hospitals in section 1135 emergency
areas have since made us aware of
several issues that are not addressed (or
not addressed adequately) under current
regulations. For instance, some of the
hurricane-affected programs in New
Orleans and elsewhere did not in fact
close entirely. In many cases, a reduced
number of residents continued to train
in the hospitals’ outpatient departments.
Therefore, those programs at the home
hospitals did not actually close, and
neither the home or host hospitals will
be able to use the regulatory provisions
at § 413.79(h) to enable host hospitals
that are at or above their FTE resident
caps to count displaced residents from
home hospitals for Medicare direct GME
and IME purposes. We understand that
even hospitals that had originally
completely closed their programs have
been in the process of gradually
reopening their programs (that is,
residents are being brought back to the
home hospitals in stages). Therefore,
even where a home hospital temporarily
closed a program following the disaster,
once it begins training any residents
(even a fraction of an FTE resident) in
that program again, the program is no
longer closed and any adjustments made
to the host hospital’s cap under the
closed program regulation would no
longer be allowed. Therefore, we believe
that, in order to remove the disincentive
faced by hospitals that are at or above
their FTE resident caps to continue
training displaced residents, some kind
of regulatory relief is necessary.
II. Meeting the Needs of Teaching
Hospitals Affected by a Disaster
[If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
caption ‘‘TEACHING HOSPITALS
AFFECTED BY A DISASTER’’ at the
beginning of your comments.]
This interim final rule with comment
period will amend the Medicare GME
affiliation regulations to address the
needs and incentives of home and host
hospitals in the event of an emergency
or disaster. In developing a policy to
provide home and host hospitals
flexibility in response to a disaster, we
address two priorities. First, we believe
that in disaster situations, to the extent
that the statute permits, the policy
should facilitate the continuity of GME,
minimizing the disruption of residency
training. Second, the policy should take
into account that the training programs
at home hospitals have been severely
disrupted by a disaster and that home
hospitals will usually want to rebuild
their GME programs as soon as possible.
A. Overview of the Closed Programs
Provisions
As we noted in our Q&A (posted on
the CMS Web site), issued in response
to inquiries from hospitals affected by
Hurricane Katrina, the regulations at
§ 413.79(h) offer a payment policy
option that could be applied in limited
situations occurring after a disaster.
Thus, a host hospital would be allowed
to make temporary adjustments to its
IME and direct GME caps (limited by
the home hospital’s IME and direct GME
caps) in order to count displaced
residents for direct GME and IME
payment purposes. However, due to the
complexity of training programs where
residents train at multiple hospitals
(this is a common training model used
throughout the country), there are many
potential difficulties that can arise in
applying this policy to address disaster
situations.
Typically, residents in a program
spend time training during the year at
multiple hospitals, some of which may
have been affected by the disaster, while
others may not have been affected. For
example, a first year resident in a family
practice program may spend one third
of the year training at a hospital in New
Orleans, and the remaining two-thirds
of the year at other hospitals in Baton
Rouge. When the New Orleans hospital
closed due to the hurricane, this
resident may have been training at one
of the Baton Rouge hospitals. Therefore,
although the resident was not
immediately displaced by the hurricane,
since the resident would have rotated to
the New Orleans hospital later in the
year, the resident will ultimately be
affected. Conversely, a resident that was
training in New Orleans at the time of
the hurricane was immediately
displaced, so even if the resident was
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
transferred to a host hospital in Texas to
continue training, that resident may be
able to continue to train at the
unaffected Baton Rouge hospital after
completing a rotation at the host
hospital.
Additional complexity can arise
through the interaction of the home and
host hospital’s FTE resident caps. Each
one of the home hospitals involved in
the previous example could be training
residents above their respective IME and
direct GME FTE resident caps. Since the
closed program provisions are residentspecific, that is, the host hospital’s cap
adjustment is tied to the specific
resident who was displaced, as
specified at § 413.79(h), documentation
would be required to account for each
resident’s FTE time spent training at
each of the home and host hospitals.
Additionally, because the policy under
§ 413.79(h) is resident-specific, the host
hospital would only receive a temporary
cap adjustment for as long as the
specific residents are displaced.
Therefore, home and host hospitals
would need to provide a very detailed
accounting of each resident’s training as
required at § 413.79(h).
Hospitals in New Orleans have
notified us that in light of the damage
they suffered from the hurricane,
documenting the specific residents,
their rotations at the various home and
host hospitals (and the FTEs associated
with each rotation) and where the
displaced residents were sent after the
hurricane constitutes a major
documentation burden. We note that
although CMS extended the
documentation deadline to January 31,
2006, under the authority of section
1135 of the Act, giving hospitals 5
months from the time of the hurricane
to submit this type of documentation,
we are aware of no hospitals that
complied with all of the documentation
requirements listed at § 413.79(h) by the
due date. Therefore, due to the
challenges and complexities mentioned
above, we believe that the existing
closed program regulations do not
adequately address the issues associated
with Medicare direct GME and IME
payment policies that are faced by
residency training programs affected by
a disaster.
B. Overview of the Medicare GME
Affiliation Provisions
Accordingly, we are revising
§ 413.75(b) to include definitions of
emergency Medicare GME affiliated
group, home hospital, host hospital,
section 1135 emergency area, and
section 1135 emergency period. We are
also revising § 413.79(f) to set forth the
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18657
requirements of an emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreement.
The existing definition of Medicare
GME affiliated group at § 413.75(b)
specifies that hospitals may only form a
Medicare GME affiliated group with
other hospitals if they are in the same
or contiguous urban or rural areas, if
they are under common ownership, or
if they are jointly listed as program
sponsors or major participating
institutions in the same program. The
existing Medicare GME affiliation
provisions at § 413.79(f) permit
participating teaching hospitals to
aggregate and ‘‘share’’ FTE caps during
a specified academic year. The Medicare
GME affiliation regulations allow
hospitals that need to either decrease or
increase their FTE resident counts to
reflect the normal movement of
residents among affiliated hospitals to
do so for the agreed-upon training years.
Hospitals that affiliate must submit a
Medicare GME affiliation agreement, as
specified at § 413.75(b), to their
Medicare FIs and to CMS no later than
July 1 of the relevant academic year.
Each hospital in the Medicare GME
affiliated group must have a shared
rotational arrangement with at least one
other hospital within the Medicare GME
affiliated group, and all of the hospitals
within the Medicare GME affiliated
group must be connected by a series of
shared rotational arrangements. The net
effect of the adjustments to hospitals’
FTE resident caps, whether positive or
negative on a hospital-specific basis, in
the aggregate must not exceed zero.
While additional hospitals may not be
added to the Medicare GME affiliated
group after July 1 of a year, amendments
to the affiliation agreement to adjust the
distribution of the number of FTE
residents in the original Medicare GME
affiliation among the hospitals that are
part of the Medicare GME affiliated
group can be made through June 30 of
the academic year for which they are
effective.
C. Overview of the Emergency Medicare
GME Affiliated Group Provision
[If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘OVERVIEW OF THE
EMERGENCY MEDICARE GME
AFFILIATED GROUP PROVISION’’ at
the beginning of your comments.]
Based on what we have learned about
the impact of a disaster on teaching
hospitals, we believe it is necessary to
provide hospitals with greater flexibility
to distribute FTE resident caps within a
group of home and host hospitals if
there is an emergency at a home
hospital that has resulted in the
designation of a section 1135 emergency
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
18658
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
area. We believe that a modified
Medicare GME affiliation policy would
allow affected hospitals the maximum
degree of flexibility following the
disaster so that residents displaced by
the disaster can continue their residency
training at other hospitals, while the
home hospitals can remain committed
to reopening their programs.
While there may be hospitals in the
section 1135 emergency area that do not
experience a disruption in residency
training due to the disaster, the
provisions in this rule are only intended
to help home hospitals, that is, hospitals
that have been directly affected by the
disaster to the extent that their inpatient
bed occupancy is diminished, limiting
the hospital’s ability to train residents.
In determining whether a hospital in a
section 1135 emergency area qualifies as
a home hospital, we believe it is
appropriate to compare the inpatient
bed occupancy of the hospital one week
before the earlier of the date the section
1135 emergency period begins, or the
date on which the hospital began any
evacuation efforts in anticipation of an
event that results in the declaration of
a section 1135 emergency area, to the
inpatient bed occupancy of the hospital
one week after the section 1135
emergency period begins. If the
inpatient bed occupancy decreases by
20 percent or more between these two
comparison timeframes, we believe that
the significant drop in occupancy can be
assumed to be the result of the event
that led to the declaration of a section
1135 emergency period. We believe a
hospital that experiences such a drop in
occupancy may not have enough
patients to continue to provide for
adequate residency training, and
therefore, may need to send residents to
host hospitals. The emergency Medicare
GME regulations are applicable to these
home hospitals. These emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group
provisions in § 413.79(f)(6) are effective
as of the date of the first day of a section
1135 emergency period (for example, in
the case of Hurricane Katrina, they are
effective on August 29, 2005). The
duration of these emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreements is limited to
the remainder of the academic year
during which the section 1135
emergency period began, plus two
additional academic years. Thus, an
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement is permitted to remain in
effect for no more than 3 training years,
beginning with the first day of the
section 1135 emergency period. (An
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement could remain in effect for
three full academic years only if the first
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
day of a section 1135 emergency period
occurred on July 1.)
For example, in the case of Hurricane
Katrina, an emergency Medicare GME
affiliation could be effective from
August 29, 2005, to June 30, 2006 (we
refer to this as the first effective year);
the affiliation could also be effective for
two subsequent academic years: the
second effective year of the emergency
Medicare GME affiliation would be from
July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007, and the
third effective year would be from July
1, 2007 to June 30, 2008. At the
conclusion of the allowable effective
period for an emergency Medicare GME
affiliated group, the emergency
provisions at § 413.79(f)(6) cease to
apply, and the existing provisions for
Medicare GME affiliation agreements at
§ 413.79(f)(1) through (5) would apply.
We believe that the limits on the
allowable effective period for emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group serve to
maintain GME funding over a sufficient
period to allow home hospitals to
rebuild their GME programs, while also
supporting the continuity of residency
training. We welcome public comments
on whether the allowable effective
period is sufficient time to
accommodate rebuilding of residency
programs at home hospitals.
D. Emergency Medicare GME Affiliated
Group Provisions
1. Affiliation Agreement
To provide home hospitals with more
flexibility to train displaced residents at
various sites, and to allow host hospitals
to count displaced residents for IME and
direct GME, home hospitals may enter
into emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreements effective
retroactive to the date of the first day of
the section 1135 emergency period.
The emergency Medicare GME
affiliated group may include hospitals
that would not meet the requirements
for a Medicare GME affiliated group as
specified as § 413.75(b). Specifically, for
these emergency Medicare GME
affiliated groups, home hospitals may
affiliate with host hospitals anywhere in
the country because we recognize that
immediately following a disaster, home
hospitals need flexibility to assign
displaced residents to any available
program. As home hospitals recover the
ability to train residents after a disaster,
the emergency Medicare GME affiliated
group provisions allow home hospitals
to return residents to their training sites,
thereby giving home hospitals the
opportunity to rebuild their programs
incrementally.
For the year during which the section
1135 emergency was declared, each
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
hospital participating in the emergency
affiliation must submit a copy of the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement, as specified under
§ 413.79(f)(6), to CMS and the CMS FI
servicing each hospital in the agreement
by the later of 180 days after the section
1135 emergency period begins or by
June 30 of the relevant training year.
Emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreements for the subsequent 2
academic years must be submitted by
the later of 180 days after the section
1135 emergency period begins or by July
1 of each of the years. Amendments to
the emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement to adjust the distribution of
the number of FTE residents in the
original emergency Medicare GME
affiliation among the hospitals that are
part of the emergency Medicare GME
affiliated group can be made through
June 30 of the academic year for which
they are effective. The emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement
must be written, signed, and dated by
responsible representatives of each
participating hospital and must: (1) List
each participating hospital and its
provider number, and specify whether
the hospital is a home or host hospital;
(2) specify the effective period of the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement; (3) list each participating
hospital’s IME and direct GME FTE caps
in effect for the current academic year
before the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation (that is, if the hospital was
already a member of a regular Medicare
GME affiliated group before entering
into the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation, the emergency Medicare
GME affiliation must be premised on the
FTE caps of the hospital as adjusted per
the regular Medicare GME affiliation
agreement, and not include any slots
gained under section 422 of the MMA);
and (4) specify the total adjustment to
each hospital’s FTE caps in each year
that the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement is in effect, for
both direct GME and IME, that reflects
a positive adjustment to the host
hospital’s direct and indirect FTE caps
that is offset by a negative adjustment to
the home hospital’s (or hospitals’) direct
and indirect FTE caps of at least the
same amount. The sum total of
adjustments to all the participating
hospitals’ FTE caps under the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement may not exceed the aggregate
adjusted caps of the hospitals
participating in the emergency Medicare
GME affiliated group. A home hospital’s
IME and direct GME FTE cap reductions
under an emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement are limited to the
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
home hospital’s IME and direct GME
FTE resident caps in effect for the
academic year in accordance with
regulations at § 413.79(c)(1) through
(c)(3) or § 413.75(b), that is, the
hospital’s base year FTE resident caps as
adjusted by any and all existing
affiliation agreements.
In addition to meeting the
requirements for an emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement, a
host hospital will be required to
document that any FTE residents
counted pursuant to the emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement are,
in fact, displaced residents from a
program located in the emergency area.
That is, the host hospital will need to
provide the FI with a list of resident
names and social security numbers, and
the name of the original sponsor of the
program located at the home hospital in
the emergency area for each displaced
resident. We note that the hospital is
already required, as specified at
§ 413.75(d), to provide much of this
information in order to include any
resident in its FTE count for a particular
cost reporting period. We are adding the
requirement that a host hospital
document the original program sponsor
of each displaced resident it is training
in order to document that any
additional FTE residents counted
pursuant to the emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreement are indeed
due to training of displaced residents.
Providing appropriate and sufficient
documentation permits the FI to
properly reconcile the correct FTE
resident count for each hospital.
2. Multiple Affiliations
In many cases, home hospitals will
already have Medicare GME affiliation
agreements in effect before the section
1135 emergency period, and may be
entering into emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreements with host
hospitals that will already have regular
Medicare GME affiliation agreements in
effect. Therefore, such situations will
lead to multiple layers of Medicare GME
affiliations. It is critical that the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreements accurately state the
appropriate caps for each hospital in the
affiliated group in order for the FIs to
pay the hospitals correctly. The
hospitals must attach copies of all
existing Medicare GME affiliation
agreements (that is, a hospital’s regular
or other emergency Medicare GME
affiliations already in place for the year)
when submitting the emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement to
the FI so that the FI can verify and
reconcile the cap adjustments. For
example, if a home hospital has a direct
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
GME cap of 100 but has an existing
affiliation agreement before the disaster
in which it reduced its cap by 40 FTEs,
then, for purposes of entering into the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement, it has an adjusted direct
GME cap of 60 with which to affiliate
under the emergency affiliation
provisions. The emergency Medicare
GME affiliation provisions are different
from the regular Medicare GME
affiliation provisions in that regular
Medicare GME affiliations are based
upon the hospitals’ FTE resident caps
before any adjustments resulting from
Medicare GME affiliation agreements.
Because they are likely to occur during
an academic year, and cannot be
anticipated before the beginning of the
year, emergency Medicare GME
affiliations are based upon hospitals’
FTE resident caps as they are already
modified by any existing Medicare GME
affiliation agreement(s).
In order to provide each hospital with
its correct payment, the CMS FIs
involved need to be aware of both
regular Medicare GME affiliation
agreements and any emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreements in
which a hospital is participating.
Without the correct information on each
hospital’s Medicare GME affiliation
agreements (whether regular or
emergency affiliations), hospitals could
be paid improperly for direct GME and
IME based on application of incorrect
FTE resident caps that do not reflect all
Medicare GME affiliation agreements in
effect (that is, regular and emergency
affiliations).
Furthermore, to determine direct GME
and IME payments under an emergency
Medicare GME affiliation, the normal
FTE-counting rules as specified at
§ 413.78 will apply. For example,
residents beyond the initial residency
period are counted at .5 FTE for direct
GME purposes. The existing IME FTEcounting rules as specified at
§ 412.105(f) apply in determining the
IME adjustment. Therefore, when the
CMS FI settles a cost report for a
hospital in which an emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement is
reflected, each participating hospital
would be held to its adjusted IME and
adjusted direct GME caps as agreed to
and specified in the emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement.
We note that in the IPPS final rule
published in the Federal Register on
August 11, 2004 (69 FR 49142), we state
‘‘* * * hospitals that receive section
422 cap increases from CMS and
participate in a Medicare GME
affiliation agreement under § 413.79(f)
on or after July 1, 2005 may only
affiliate for the purposes of adjusting
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18659
their 1996 FTE caps (adjusted for new
programs and any other reductions
under section 1886(h)(7)(A) of the Act)
for direct GME and IME. The additional
slots that a hospital receives under
section 422 of the MMA may not be
aggregated and applied to the FTE
resident caps of any other hospitals.’’
Similarly, we are providing that any
slots gained under section 422 of the
MMA may not be used in any
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement.
We are providing examples below of
the emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreements and discussing the
ramifications of the provisions.
Example I
For the training year beginning on
July 1, 2005, Hospital A and Hospital B
have a regular Medicare GME affiliation
agreement in which Hospital A (which
has IME and direct GME caps of 20
FTEs) agrees to transfer 10 FTEs to
Hospital B (which has IME and direct
GME caps of 15 FTEs). Under the
regular affiliation agreement, Hospital B
now has adjusted caps of 25 FTEs and
Hospital A has adjusted caps of 10 FTEs
for both IME and direct GME. As a
result of Hurricane Zeta on November 1,
2005, Hospital A sustained damage to
its inpatient facilities (reducing its
occupancy by 20 percent or more) and
has displaced residents that it needs to
send to other hospitals for training.
Hospital A is located in a section 1135
emergency area, and the first day of the
section 1135 emergency period is
November 1, 2005. In this case, Hospital
A is a home hospital as defined under
§ 413.75(b), and is permitted to enter
into an emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement as specified at
§ 413.79(f)(6).
In Example I above, Hospital B was
not affected by the hurricane (that is,
Hospital B was able to continue training
residents at the same level it was before
the hurricane, and is training the
maximum number of residents under its
FTE caps as adjusted by the existing
Medicare GME affiliation agreement
with Hospital A). We note that Hospitals
A and B may modify their regular
Medicare GME affiliation agreement, if
necessary, no later than June 30, 2006,
under the requirements as specified at
§ 413.79(f)(5). In this case, Hospital B
does not qualify as a home hospital
since its inpatient occupancy was not
reduced by 20 percent or more even
though it was located in the area
covered by the section 1135 waiver.
Hospital A elects to enter into an
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement with host Hospitals C and D
in two other States because those
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
18660
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
hospitals are well-situated to provide
residents displaced from Hospital A
with an appropriate training experience.
Accordingly, all of the hospitals (A, C,
and D) in the emergency Medicare GME
affiliated group must submit copies of
the emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement to CMS and to the CMS FIs
servicing the hospitals participating in
the emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement by June 30, 2006 (in this case,
June 30, 2006 is the later of 180 days
after the section 1135 emergency period
begins (November 1, 2005) or by June 30
of the relevant training year). In Table
I below, we list the FTE resident cap
information that the emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement,
included for the first effective period,
which was submitted to CMS and the
CMS FI on June 30, 2006.
TABLE I.—EMERGENCY MEDICARE GME AFFILIATION AGREEMENT DUE TO HURRICANE ZETA FOR EFFECTIVE PERIOD—
NOVEMBER 1, 2005 TO JUNE 30, 2006
Hospital name
Provider No.
Hospital A .............................................................................
Hospital C ............................................................................
Hospital D ............................................................................
As indicated in Example I above,
Hospital B was not affected by the
hurricane, and therefore did not
participate in an emergency Medicare
GME affiliated group. However,
Hospital A is required to attach a copy
of the existing Medicare GME affiliation
agreement it has with Hospital B to the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement submitted to CMS and its FI
to document its adjusted cap of 10 FTEs.
Hospitals C and D are similarly required
to attach copies of all existing Medicare
GME affiliation agreements that they
may be participating in as of July 1,
2005, (including any regular or
emergency affiliation agreements) in
order to document their caps.
To further illustrate this policy
continuing with the above example,
Hospital C, which has an adjusted direct
GME cap under the emergency Medicare
GME affiliation of 14 FTEs, could count
IME cap before emergency
affiliation
19–9999
45–9999
33–9999
Direct GME
cap before
emergency
affiliation
10
10
10
up to four displaced FTE residents
during the first effective year assuming
that Hospital C can document that these
FTEs are from programs in the section
1135 emergency area. However, upon
cost report settlement, the CMS FI
determined that Hospital C has actually
trained a total of 16 FTEs during the
cost reporting period. Since each
participating hospital will be held to
their adjusted IME and adjusted direct
GME caps as agreed to and specified in
the emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement, the CMS FI would only
allow four of the six additional FTEs
Hospital C trained pursuant to the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement.
Example II
Alternatively, assume that both
Hospitals A and B from Example I above
are affected by the same hurricane, both
qualify as a home hospital, and both
10
10
10
Adjusted IME
cap under the
emergency
affiliation
Adjusted Direct GME cap
under the
emergency
affiliation
1 (¥9)
14 (+4)
15 (+5)
1 (¥9)
14 (+4)
15 (+5)
need to participate in an emergency
Medicare GME affiliation with host
Hospitals C and D in the other States.
We note that while Hospitals A and
B may modify their existing Medicare
GME affiliation agreement on or before
June 30, 2006, Hospitals A and B may
find it easier to reflect the changes in
training (and the resultant shift of FTE
resident caps) due to Hurricane Zeta
through the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement. In this scenario,
Hospitals A and B may execute an
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement in which the emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group includes
Hospitals A, B, C, and D. In Table II
below, we list the FTE cap information
that the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement included for the
first effective period, which was
submitted to CMS and the CMS FI on
June 30, 2006.
TABLE II.—EMERGENCY MEDICARE GME AFFILIATION AGREEMENT DUE TO HURRICANE ZETA FOR EFFECTIVE PERIOD—
NOVEMBER 1, 2005 TO JUNE 30, 2006
Hospital name
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Hospital
Hospital
Hospital
Hospital
Provider No.
A .............................................................................
B .............................................................................
C ............................................................................
D ............................................................................
We note that the pre-existing regular
Medicare GME affiliation agreement
between Hospitals A and B which predated the disaster is still in effect
according to existing affiliation
agreement rules; therefore Hospitals A
and B must account for any FTE
resident cap transfers specified in the
regular affiliation agreement when they
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
IME cap before
emergency
affiliation
19–9999
19–8999
45–9999
33–9999
10
25
10
10
enter into the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement with host
Hospitals C and D. In addition, a copy
of Hospital A and B’s regular Medicare
GME affiliation agreement must be
attached to the emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreement that is
submitted to CMS and the hospitals’
CMS FIs.
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Direct GME
cap before
emergency
affiliation
10
25
10
10
Adjusted IME
cap under the
emergency
affiliation
Adjusted Direct GME cap
under the
emergency
affiliation
1 (¥9)
10 (¥15)
19 (+9)
25 (+15)
1 (¥9)
10 (¥15)
19 (+9)
25 (+15)
3. Submission Process
Submissions of emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreements should be
sent to:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Division of Acute Care,
Attention: Elizabeth Truong or Renate
Rockwell, Mailstop C4–08–06, 7500
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244.
‘‘Emergency Medicare GME
Affiliation Agreement’’ should be
clearly labeled on the outside envelope.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
4. Application of Existing Rules
[If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘APPLICATION OF EXISTING
RULES’’ at the beginning of your
comments.]
a. New Teaching Hospitals
Immediately after a disaster, home
hospitals are in the best position to
determine where their residents should
be sent to continue with their residency
training. Although home hospitals may
send their residents to train at existing
teaching hospitals, in some cases,
hospitals affected by a disaster may
need to send residents to non-teaching
hospitals (that is, hospitals that have not
included any residents training in
approved medical residency training
programs on a previous Medicare cost
report) to continue their training.
The following discussion is intended
to inform hospitals of how CMS will
determine the GME payments to the
host hospital in the case where home
hospitals choose to send displaced
residents to host hospitals that were
previously non-teaching hospitals.
These host hospitals will become new
teaching hospitals once they begin to
train residents from the home hospitals
as part of an approved medical
residency training program. As a new
teaching hospital, such a hospital
initially will have IME and direct GME
FTE resident caps of zero (based on the
number of residents training in the 1996
base year for FTE resident caps).
However, the new teaching hospital, by
participating in an emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreement, can receive a
temporary cap increase in order to count
the displaced FTE residents for
purposes of IME and direct GME
payments.
As a new teaching hospital, the
hospital will not have an existing per
resident amount for direct GME
payment purposes. The per resident
amounts for these hospitals will be
established as specified at § 413.77(e)
(just as any other new teaching hospital
would have its per resident amount
established). The new teaching
hospital’s per resident amount is
established based on the lower of the
hospital’s direct GME costs per resident
in its base year, or the updated weighted
mean value of the per resident amounts
of all hospitals located in the same
geographic wage area as specified at
§ 413.77. Therefore, it is very important
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
for a new teaching host hospital to incur
direct GME costs in its base year and to
document all of the direct GME costs it
incurs (for example, the residents’
salaries, fringe benefits, any portion of
the teaching physician salaries
attributable to GME, and other direct
GME costs) for the displaced residents
it is training; otherwise the host hospital
risks being assigned a very low per
resident amount in accordance with our
regulations. If the host, new teaching
hospital incurs no GME costs in the
relevant base year, its per resident
amount would be zero dollars. We
advise hospitals to refer to the
provisions at § 413.77(e) for the rules
concerning the establishment of a new
teaching hospital’s per resident amount.
In accordance with section 1886(h) of
the Act and our regulations at § 413.77,
once the base year per resident amount
is established, it is fixed and not subject
to adjustment to reflect costs incurred in
years subsequent to the base year that
might be associated with new programs
or additional residents.
b. Shared Rotational Requirements
As specified at § 413.79(f)(2), each
hospital in a regular Medicare GME
affiliated group must have a shared
rotational arrangement with at least one
other hospital participating in the
Medicare GME affiliation agreement. All
of the hospitals within the Medicare
GME affiliated group would therefore be
connected by a series of shared
rotational arrangements. As defined at
§ 413.75(b), a shared rotational
arrangement ‘‘means a residency
training program under which a
resident(s) participates in training at
two or more hospitals in that program.’’
We are specifying at § 413.79(f)(6) that
hospitals that are members of an
emergency Medicare GME affiliated
group are not required to participate in
a shared rotational arrangement with the
other hospitals participating in the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement. We are implementing this
provision because we recognize that
members of an emergency Medicare
GME affiliated group may be
geographically dispersed across the
country, which would make it difficult
for residents to participate in shared
rotational arrangements. Additionally,
after a disaster, affected hospitals may
not have the resources available to
participate in shared rotational
arrangements with host hospitals
situated around the country. For
example, hospitals may not have the
financial capability to continuously
transport residents between States.
Therefore, we are exempting
participants in emergency Medicare
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18661
GME affiliations from the shared
rotational requirements.
c. Weighted FTE Counts (‘‘3-Year
Rolling Average’’)
As specified at § 412.105(f)(1)(v) and
§ 413.79(d), a ‘‘3-year rolling average’’ is
applied to a hospital’s count of FTE
residents to calculate IME and direct
GME payments for a cost reporting
period (that is, the number of FTEs used
to calculate payments is the average of
the number of FTE residents reported
for the current year, the prior year, and
the penultimate year). For example, if
the hospital trained 115 FTE residents
(for IME) in the current cost reporting
period, 100 FTEs in the prior cost
reporting period, and 100 FTEs in the
penultimate cost reporting period, then
the IME payment would not be based
solely on the 115 residents trained in
the current year. Rather, the IME
payment in the current year would be
based on the 3-year rolling average FTE
count (that is, (115 + 100 + 100) / 3
which equals 105 FTEs).
Thus, if a hospital increases its
number of FTE residents, as a result of
the 3-year rolling average rule, the
hospital would be able to count only
one third of the additional FTE
residents in that year, two-thirds of the
additional FTEs for the next year, and
the full number in the third year
(assuming there are no other changes in
the number of FTE residents training in
subsequent years). Conversely, if a
hospital decreases its number of FTE
residents in the current year, then the 3year rolling average minimizes the effect
of the reduced GME payments based on
the reduced level of training over the
next 3 years. Home hospitals that have
reduced the number of FTE residents
training at their hospitals would benefit
under this provision since only onethird of the FTE resident reduction will
apply in the first cost reporting year in
which an emergency period is declared.
The 3-year rolling average provision, as
specified at § 412.105 and § 413.79(d),
will be applied to all hospitals in the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation,
and their associated FTE resident counts
while the agreement is in effect. This
provision is the same as applied under
existing regulations in which hospitals
participating in a Medicare GME
affiliation agreement(s) are subject to the
3-year rolling average.
However, there is an exception to the
application of the 3-year rolling average
rules for closed program and closed
hospital regulations as specified at
§ 413.79(d)(6). In the case of host
hospitals that participate in emergency
Medicare GME affiliated groups relating
to the section 1135 emergency declared
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
18662
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita,
which occurred in 2005, we understand
that, based on the Q&A we posted on
the CMS Web site discussing
application of the closed program and
closed hospital regulations to these
hospitals, there was an expectation
among host hospitals that the displaced
FTE residents they accepted for training
would be exempt from application of
the 3-year rolling average, and that the
host hospitals would immediately be
permitted to include all of those
residents in their FTE resident counts.
Many host hospitals, believing that the
existing regulations regarding closed
hospitals and closed programs would be
applied, took in displaced residents
with the reasonable expectation that
they would be able to count those
additional residents as FTEs not subject
to the 3-year rolling average rules
specified at § 412.105 and § 413.79(d).
In recognition of this expectation, we
are providing for a time-limited
exception to the 3-year rolling average
rules so that a host hospital
participating in an emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreement relating to
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and
training residents in excess of its cap,
consistent with the rolling average
provisions applicable for closed
programs as specified at § 413.79(d)(6),
will exclude from the 3-year rolling
average FTE residents associated with
displaced residents from August 29,
2005, to June 30, 2006. All host
hospitals in an emergency Medicare
GME affiliated group will be subject to
the existing 3-year rolling average
requirements beginning on July 1, 2006.
Accordingly, we revised § 413.79(f) by
adding a new paragraph (6) to provide
for more flexibility in Medicare GME
affiliations for home hospitals located in
section 1135 emergency areas to allow
the home hospitals to efficiently find
training sites for displaced residents.
Under the flexibility provided by the
emergency Medicare GME affiliated
group provisions as specified at
§ 413.79(f)(6), decisions regarding the
transfer of FTE resident cap slots,
including how to address situations
where the home hospital was training a
number of residents in excess of its cap
before the disaster, and the tracking of
those FTE resident slots, would be left
to the home and host hospitals to work
out among themselves. The home and
host hospitals are, however, required to
include much of this information in
their emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreements as specified under
§ 413.79(f)(6). Furthermore, since
hospitals may amend the emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement (on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
or before June 30 of the relevant
academic year) to reflect the actual
training situation among the hospitals
participating in the emergency Medicare
GME affiliated group, hospitals are
provided with greater flexibility to
accommodate any changing residency
training circumstances within the
emergency Medicare GME affiliated
group. We note that the emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group
provisions promulgated herein are
intended for the purpose of providing
for continued training of residents
displaced from a section 1135
emergency area, and not to enable
hospitals to merely shift and change
FTE resident caps with other hospitals
in the country (for instance, in order to
maximize Medicare IME and direct
GME payments).
III. Provisions of the Interim Final Rule
[If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘PROVISIONS OF THE
INTERIM FINAL RULE’’ at the
beginning of your comments.]
We are revising the Medicare GME
regulations at § 412.105, § 413.75(b), and
§ 413.79(f) to implement an emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group policy
that will only apply to certain home
hospitals in a section 1135 emergency
area and host hospitals that accept
displaced residents from a home
hospital.
Section 412.105 Special Treatment:
Hospitals That Incur Indirect Costs for
Graduate Medical Education Programs
In § 412.105, we revised paragraph
(a)(1)(i) to specify that special treatment
for hospitals that incur indirect costs for
GME programs also applies to the
emergency Medicare GME affiliated
groups.
In addition, we revised paragraph
(f)(1)(vi) to specify that hospitals that
are part of the same Medicare GME
affiliated group or emergency Medicare
GME affiliate group may elect to apply
the limit at paragraph (f)(1)(iv) of this
section on an aggregate basis, as
specified in § 413.97(f).
Section 413.75 Direct GME Payments:
General Requirements
In § 413.75(b), we added the
definition of an ‘‘Emergency Medicare
GME affiliated group,’’ and within this
definition, we specify the meaning of
‘‘Home hospital’’ and ‘‘Host hospital,’’
and we define ‘‘Section 1135 emergency
area or section 1135 emergency period.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Section 413.79 Direct GME Payments:
Determination of the Weighted Number
of FTE Residents
In § 413.79(f), we revised the
introductory text to specify that a
hospital may receive a temporary
adjustment to its FTE cap, which,
except as provided in subsection (6)(iv),
is subject to the averaging rules at
§ 413.79(d), to reflect residents added or
subtracted because the hospital is
participating in a Medicare GME
affiliated group or an emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group as
defined at § 413.75(b).
In § 413.79(f)(6), we set forth the
requirements for emergency Medicare
GME affiliated group.
In paragraph (f)(6)(i), we specify the
requirements for the emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement that
each hospital participating in the
emergency Medicare GME affiliated
group must submit. Specifically, each
participating hospital must submit an
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement that is written, signed, and
dated by responsible representatives of
each participating hospital, and the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement must include the following:
• Specify the effective period of the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement (which must, in any event,
terminate at the conclusion of two
academic years following the academic
year in which the section 1135
emergency period began).
• List each participating hospital’s
IME and direct GME FTE caps in effect
before the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement (including any
adjustments to those caps in effect as a
result of other Medicare GME affiliation
agreements but not including any slots
gained under § 413.79(c)(4)).
• Specify the total adjustment to each
participating hospital’s FTE caps in
each academic year that the emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement is
in effect, for both direct GME and IME,
that reflects a positive adjustment to the
host hospital’s direct and indirect FTE
caps that is offset by a negative
adjustment to the home hospital’s (or
hospitals’) direct and indirect FTE caps
of at least the same amount. The sum
total of adjustments to all the
participating hospitals’ FTE caps under
the emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement may not exceed the aggregate
adjusted FTE caps of the hospitals
participating in the emergency Medicare
GME affiliated group. A home hospital’s
IME and direct GME FTE cap reductions
in an emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement are limited to the
home hospital’s IME and direct GME
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
FTE resident caps at § 413.79(c)(1)
through (c)(3) or § 413.75(b), that is, as
adjusted by any and all existing
affiliation agreements as applicable.
• Attach copies of all existing
Medicare GME affiliation agreements
and emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreements in which the
hospital is participating at the time the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement is executed.
In paragraph (f)(6)(ii), we specify that
each participating hospital must submit
the emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement to CMS and submit a copy to
the CMS FI. Specifically, an emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement
must be submitted to CMS with a copy
to the CMS FI by the later of 180 days
after the section 1135 emergency period
begins or by July 1 of the academic year
in which the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement is effective.
In paragraph (f)(6)(iii), we specify that
during the effective period of the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement, hospitals in the emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group are not
required to participate in a shared
rotational arrangement as defined at
§ 413.75(b).
In paragraph (f)(6)(iv), we specify the
host hospital exception from the rolling
average for the period from August 29,
2005 to June 30, 2006. We also specify
how to determine the FTE resident
count for a host hospital that is counting
a number of displaced residents in
excess of its cap for the period from
August 29, 2005, through June 30, 2006.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
IV. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public
comments we normally receive on
Federal Register documents, we are not
able to acknowledge or respond to them
individually. We will consider all
comments we receive by the date and
time specified in the DATES section of
this preamble, and, when we proceed
with a subsequent document, we will
respond to the comments in the
preamble to that document.
V. Effective Date and Waiver of
Proposed Rulemaking
[If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘EFFECTIVE DATE AND
WAIVER OF PROPOSED
RULEMAKING’’ at the beginning of
your comments.]
The Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) normally requires a 30-day delay
in the effective date of a final rule. This
delay may be waived, however, if an
agency finds for good cause that the
delay is impracticable, unnecessary or
contrary to the public interest, and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
incorporates a statement of the finding
and the reasons for it in the rule issued.
The Secretary is subject to a similar
requirement pursuant to section
1871(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the Act. Further,
under section 1871(e)(1)(A) of the Act,
the Secretary is prohibited from
applying substantive changes in policy
retroactively unless the Secretary
determines that retroactive application
is necessary to comply with statutory
requirements, or that the failure to apply
the change retroactively would be
contrary to the public interest.
We find that good cause exists to
waive the 30-day delay in effective date
because it would be contrary to the
public interest to delay the effective
date of this interim final rule with
comment period. We find further that
failure to apply the provisions of this
interim final rule with comment period
retroactively to August 29, 2005, which
is the first date on which there was an
emergency area and emergency period
under section 1135 of the Act resulting
from the impact of Hurricane Katrina,
would be contrary to the public interest.
Due to the infrastructure damage and
disruption of operations experienced by
medical facilities, and the consequent
disruption in residency training, caused
by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in
August of 2005, there is urgent need for
the regulation changes provided in this
interim final rule with comment period
to be applied retroactively. Existing
regulations do not adequately address
the issues relating to Medicare GME
payment policy faced by hospitals that
are located in the emergency areas
addressed in this rule, or those faced by
hospitals that assisted the stormimpacted hospitals with their residency
programs. We believe failure to apply
the regulatory changes retroactively
would be contrary to the public interest
because hospitals affected by Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita could otherwise face
dramatic disruptions in their Medicare
GME funding, with possible dire effects
on their GME programs and financial
stability.
Specifically, the training programs at
many teaching hospitals in New Orleans
and surrounding areas were temporarily
closed or significantly reduced in the
aftermath of the hurricanes, and the
displaced residents were transferred to
other hospitals to continue their training
programs in other parts of the country.
While some residents may eventually
return to the hurricane-affected
hospitals, others may need to remain
where they were transferred for an
extended period of time. Immediate
regulatory changes are required in order
to maintain Medicare GME funding
relating to displaced residents training
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18663
at various hospitals outside of the
emergency area, and at the same time,
to enable the hurricane-affected
hospitals to rebuild incrementally their
GME programs. Existing regulations
relating to closed hospitals and closed
residency training programs, and
relating to Medicare GME affiliation
agreements, contain certain limitations,
explained more fully in section II.A
above, that render them inapplicable or
ineffective to address the issues faced by
hospitals as a result of disruptions
caused by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
We also ordinarily publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register and invite public comment on
the proposed rule. The notice of
proposed rulemaking includes a
reference to the legal authority under
which the rule is proposed, and the
terms and substance of the proposed
rule or a description of the subjects and
issues involved. This procedure can be
waived, however, if an agency finds
good cause that a notice-and-comment
procedure is impracticable, unnecessary
or contrary to the public interest and
incorporates a statement of the finding
and supporting reasons in the rule
issued. We find that good cause exists
to waive the requirement for publication
of a notice of proposed rulemaking and
public comment prior to the effective
date of this rule because such a
procedure would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. In order
to respond to the urgent needs of the
hospitals and GME programs affected by
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, as
described more fully above, it is
necessary for these regulations to take
effect retroactively to August 29, 2005.
The ordinary notice-and-comment
procedures would serve to delay (or, in
some cases, preclude) hurricane-affected
hospitals and GME programs from
responding effectively to their
circumstances by availing themselves of
the flexibility permitted under this
interim final rule effective as of August
29, 2005.
VI. Collection of Information
Requirement
[If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘COLLECTION OF
INFORMATION REQUIREMENT’’ at the
beginning of your comments.]
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, we are required to provide 30day notice in the Federal Register and
solicit public comment before a
collection of information requirement is
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval. In order to fairly evaluate
whether an information collection
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
18664
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
should be approved by OMB, section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 requires that we
solicit comment on the following issues:
• The need for the information
collection and its usefulness in carrying
out the proper functions of our agency.
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
information collection burden.
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected.
• Recommendations to minimize the
information collection burden on the
affected public, including automated
collection techniques.
We are soliciting public comment on
each of these issues for the following
sections of this document that contain
information collection requirements
(ICRs):
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Section 413.79 Direct GME payments:
Determination of the weighted number of
FTE residents
Section 413.79(f)(6)(ii) states that each
hospital in the emergency Medicare
GME affiliated group must submit an
emergency Medicare GME agreement in
the manner specified in paragraph (iv)
and include the following information:
(A) Each participating hospital and its
provider number.
(B) Specify the effective period of the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement.
(C) List each participating hospital’s
IME and direct GME FTE caps in effect
before the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement. If the hospital was
already a member of a Medicare GME
affiliated group as defined at § 413.75(b)
before entering into the emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement, the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement must be premised on the FTE
caps of the hospital as adjusted per the
Medicare GME affiliation agreement.
(D) Specify the total adjustment to
each hospital’s FTE caps in each year
that the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement is in effect, for
both direct GME and IME, that reflects
a positive adjustment to one hospital’s
direct and indirect FTE caps that is
offset by a negative adjustment to the
other hospital’s (or hospitals’) direct and
indirect FTE caps of at least the same
amount. The sum total of adjustments to
all the participating hospital’s FTE caps
under the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement may not exceed the
aggregate adjusted caps of the affiliated
group.
(E) Attach copies of all existing
Medicare GME affiliation agreements
and emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreements the hospital is
participating in at the time the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement is executed.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
The burden associated with this
requirement is the time and effort it
would take for the GME affiliated
hospital to develop and submit the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement. It is difficult for us to
determine estimated annual burden
because we do not know how many
hospitals will be affected in any given
disaster. It would depend on what
resources are available to the affected
hospitals after sustaining damage from
the disaster. This could take a few hours
per hospital or much longer depending
on if they keep records available and
current. Hospitals also have to
coordinate with other hospitals to draw
up an affiliation agreement which may
take more time if the hospitals have to
negotiate.
If you comment on these information
collection and record keeping
requirements, please mail copies
directly to the following:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Office of Strategic Operations
and Regulatory Affairs, Division of
Regulations Development, Attn.:
Melissa Musotto, CMS–1531–IFC, Room
C5–14–03, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10235, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503,
Attn: Carolyn Lovett, CMS Desk Officer,
CMS–1531–IFC,
carolyn_lovett@omb.eop.gov. Fax (202)
395–6974.
VII. Regulatory Impact Analysis
[If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘REGULATORY IMPACT
ANALYSIS’’ at the beginning of your
comments.]
A. Overall Impact
We have examined the impacts of this
rule as required by Executive Order
12866 (September 1993, Regulatory
Planning and Review), the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19,
1980, Pub. L. 96–354), section 1102(b) of
the Social Security Act, the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4), and Executive Order 13132.
Executive Order 12866 (as amended
by Executive Order 13258, which
merely reassigns responsibility of
duties) directs agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). A regulatory impact analysis
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(RIA) must be prepared for major rules
with economically significant effects
($100 million or more in any 1 year).
This rule is not a major rule since we
anticipate that the cost to the Medicare
program will be $32.3 million for the
10-month period between August 29,
2005 and June 30, 2006.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze
options for regulatory relief of small
businesses. For purposes of the RFA,
small entities include small businesses,
nonprofit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions. Most
hospitals and most other providers and
suppliers are small entities, either by
nonprofit status or by having revenues
of $6 million to $29 million in any 1
year (for details, see the Small Business
Administration’s regulation that set
forth size standards for health care
industries at (65 FR 69432)). We believe
that the impact on the affected hospitals
will not be significant and will not
affect a substantial number of small
entities.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act
requires us to prepare a regulatory
impact analysis if a rule may have a
significant impact on the operations of
a substantial number of small rural
hospitals. This analysis must conform to
the provisions of section 604 of the
RFA. For purposes of section 1102(b) of
the Act, we define a small rural hospital
as a hospital that is located outside of
a Metropolitan Statistical Area and has
fewer than 100 beds. This rule is not
anticipated to have a significant effect
on small rural hospitals since the
provisions of this rule will most likely
be used by large teaching hospitals that
have established residency programs
and the capacity to train a larger
complement of displaced residents. The
majority of this type of teaching hospital
is located in non-rural areas.
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also
requires that agencies assess anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule whose mandates require spending
in any 1 year of $100 million in 1995
dollars, updated annually for inflation.
That threshold level is currently
approximately $120 million. This rule
will not have an effect on State, local,
or tribal governments in the aggregate
and the private sector costs will be less
than the $120 million threshold.
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
This rule will not have a substantial
effect on State or local governments.
B. Anticipated Effects
This interim final rule with comment
period modifies the current GME
regulations as they apply to Medicare
GME affiliated groups to provide for
greater flexibility in training residents in
approved residency programs during
times of disaster. Specifically, this rule
implements provisions for ‘‘emergency
Medicare GME affiliated groups’’ to
address the needs of teaching hospitals
that are forced to find alternate training
sites for residents that were displaced
by a disaster.
We believe that there are limited
effects to modifying the existing
Medicare GME affiliations to allow for
emergency affiliation agreements. We
note that we are not allowing hospitals
to count for Medicare IME or direct
GME payment purposes additional FTE
residents that had not been counted by
Medicare before a qualifying emergency.
Hospitals participating in emergency
Medicare GME affiliated groups are held
to their respective FTE resident caps as
specified by the emergency affiliation
agreement. IME and direct GME
payments to the hospitals under this
provision will not be based upon any
FTE residents in excess of the caps
specified under the emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreements. However,
Medicare spending may be affected by
differences in the per resident amounts,
resident to bed ratios, and Medicare
utilization rates of host hospitals and
home hospitals.
For purposes of comparing the
existing closed program or closed
hospital provisions to the emergency
Medicare GME affiliation provisions, we
have calculated a financial impact of the
time-limited exception to the 3-year
rolling average provision for the 10month period between August 29, 2005,
and June 30, 2006. This impact is
premised on the fact that for 10 months,
host hospitals would be permitted to
count an additional two-thirds of
displaced FTE residents, rather than
only one-third of the displaced FTEs
that they could count if the displaced
FTEs would be included in the 3-year
rolling average.
In estimating the impact of the 10month exception, we estimated the cost
based on the FY 2006 projected national
average per resident amount and the
average Medicare utilization rate for
direct GME purposes, and the average
resident to bed ratio for IME purposes.
In addition, we estimate that
approximately 293 FTE residents will be
affected. Accordingly, we believe that
the impact on combined direct GME,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
operating IME and capital IME
payments will be approximately $32.3
million for the 10-month period
between August 29, 2005 and June 30,
2006.
C. Alternatives Considered
We considered amending the closed
program regulations, at § 413.79(h), to
apply to partially closed programs.
However, due to the complexity of
training programs where residents train
at multiple hospitals, there are many
potential difficulties that can arise in
applying this policy to address disaster
situations. Typically, residents in a
program spend time training during the
year at multiple hospitals, some of
which may have been affected by the
disaster, while others may not have
been affected. Additional complexity
can arise through the interaction of the
home and host hospital’s FTE resident
caps. Each one of the home hospitals
involved could be training a number of
FTE residents above their respective
IME and direct GME FTE resident caps.
Since the closed program provisions are
resident-specific, that is, the host
hospital’s cap adjustment is tied to the
specific resident who was displaced, as
specified at § 413.79(h), documentation
would be required to account for each
resident’s FTE time spent training at
each of the home and host hospitals.
Additionally, because the policy under
§ 413.79(h) is ‘‘resident-specific’’, the
host hospital would only receive a
temporary cap adjustment for as long as
the specific residents are displaced.
Therefore, home and host hospitals
would need to provide a very detailed
accounting of each resident’s training as
required at § 413.79(h)). The
documentation that would be required if
the change in policy was to amend the
closed program regulations would prove
to be too burdensome for many
hospitals.
D. Conclusion
For these reasons, we are not
preparing analyses for either the RFA or
section 1102(b) of the Act because we
have determined that this rule would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
or a significant impact on the operations
of a substantial number of small rural
hospitals.
In accordance with the provisions of
Executive Order 12866, this regulation
was reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18665
List of Subjects
42 CFR Part 412
Health facilities, Kidney diseases,
Medicare, Puerto Rico, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
42 CFR Part 413
Health facilities, Kidney disease,
Medicare, Puerto Rico, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services amends 42 CFR
chapter IV as set forth below:
PART 412—PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT
SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 412
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and
1395hh), Sec. 124 of Pub. L. 106–113, 113
Stat. 1515, and Sec. 405 of Pub. L. 108–
173117, Stat. 2266.
Subpart G—Special treatment of
certain facilities under the prospective
payment system for inpatient
operating costs
2. Section 412.105 is amended by—
A. Republishing the introductory text.
B. Revising paragraph (a)(1)(i).
C. Republishing paragraph (f)
introductory text.
I D. Revising paragraph (f)(1)(vi).
The revisions read as follows:
I
I
I
I
§ 412.105 Special treatment: Hospitals that
incur indirect costs for graduate medical
education programs.
CMS makes an additional payment to
hospitals for indirect medical education
costs using the following procedures:
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Except for the special
circumstances for Medicare GME
affiliated groups, emergency Medicare
GME affiliated groups, and new
programs described in paragraphs
(f)(1)(vi) and (f)(1)(vii) of this section for
cost reporting periods beginning on or
after October 1, 1997, and for the special
circumstances for closed hospitals or
closed programs described in paragraph
(f)(1)(ix) of this section for cost reporting
periods beginning on or after October 1,
2002, this ratio may not exceed the ratio
for the hospital’s most recent prior cost
reporting period after accounting for the
cap on the number of allopathic and
osteopathic full-time equivalent
residents as described in paragraph
(f)(1)(iv) of this section, and adding to
the capped numerator any dental and
podiatric full-time equivalent residents.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
18666
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(f) Determining the total number of
full-time equivalent residents for cost
reporting periods beginning on or after
July 1, 1991.
*
*
*
*
*
(vi) Hospitals that are part of the same
Medicare GME affiliated group or
emergency Medicare GME affiliated
group (as defined in § 413.75(b) of this
subchapter) may elect to apply the limit
as paragraph (f)(1)(iv) of this section on
an aggregate basis, as specified in
§ 413.79(f) of this subchapter.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 413—PRINCIPLES OF
REASONABLE COST
REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR
END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE
SERVICES: PROSPECTIVELY
DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR
SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES
3. The authority citation for part 413
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: Secs. 1102, 1812(d), 1814(b),
1815, 1833(a), (i), and (n), 1861 (v), 1871,
1881, 1883, and 1886 of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1302, 1395d(d), 1395f(b),
1395g, 1395l(a), (i), and (n), 1395x(v),
1395hh, 1395rr, 1395tt, and 1395ww) Sec
124 of Pub. L. 106–113, 113 Stat. 1515.
Subpart F—Specific categories of
costs
4. In § 413.75, paragraph (b)
introductory text is republished, and the
definition for ‘‘Emergency Medicare
GME affiliated group’’ is added in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
I
§ 413.75 Direct GME payments: General
requirements.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
section and § 413.76 through § 413.83,
the following definitions apply:
*
*
*
*
*
Emergency Medicare GME affiliated
group means at least one home hospital
and one or more host hospitals, as those
terms are defined below, that meet the
requirements at § 413.79(f)(6). For
purposes of an emergency Medicare
GME affiliated group, the following
definitions apply:
(1) Home hospital means a hospital
that—
(i) is located in section 1135
emergency area;
(ii) had its inpatient bed occupancy
decreased by 20 percent or more as the
result of a section 1135 emergency
period so that it is unable to train the
number of residents it originally
intended to train in that academic year;
and
(iii) needs to send the displaced
residents to train at a host hospital.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
(2) Host hospital means a hospital
training residents displaced from a
home hospital.
(3) Section 1135 emergency area or
section 1135 emergency period mean,
respectively, a geographic area in
which, or a period during which, there
exists—
(i) An emergency or disaster declared
by the President pursuant to the
National Emergencies Act or the Robert
T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act; and
(ii) A public health emergency
declared by the Secretary pursuant to
section 319 of the Public Health Service
Act.
*
*
*
*
*
I 5. Section 413.79 is amended as
follows:
I A. Revising paragraph (f) introductory
text.
I B. Adding a new paragraph (f)(6).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 413.79 Direct GME payments:
Determination of the weighted number of
FTE residents.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Medicare GME affiliated group. A
hospital may receive a temporary
adjustment to its FTE cap, which,
except as provided in paragraph
(f)(6)(iv) below, is subject to the
averaging rules at § 413.79(d), to reflect
residents added or subtracted because
the hospital is participating in a
Medicare GME affiliated group or an
emergency Medicare GME affiliated
group (as defined at § 413.75(b)). Under
this provision—
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Emergency Medicare GME
affiliated group.
Effective on or after August 29, 2005,
home and host hospitals as defined at
§ 413.75(b) may form an emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group by
meeting the requirements provided in
this section. The emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreement may be made
effective beginning on or after the first
day of a section 1135 emergency period,
and terminates no later than at the
conclusion of two academic years
following the academic year during
which the section 1135 emergency
period began.
(i) Each hospital in the emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group must
submit an emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement that is written,
signed, and dated by responsible
representatives of each participating
hospital in the manner specified in
paragraph (ii) and includes the
following information:
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(A) List each participating hospital
and its provider number; and indicate
whether each hospital is a home or host
hospital.
(B) Specify the effective period of the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement (which must, in any event,
terminate at the conclusion of two
academic years following the academic
year in which the section 1135
emergency period began).
(C) List each participating hospital’s
IME and direct GME FTE caps in effect
before the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement (including any
adjustments to those caps in effect as a
result of other Medicare GME affiliation
agreements but not including any slots
gained under § 413.79(c)(4)).
(D) Specify the total adjustment to
each participating hospital’s FTE caps
in each academic year that the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement is in effect, for both direct
GME and IME, that reflects a positive
adjustment to the host hospital’s direct
and indirect FTE caps that is offset by
a negative adjustment to the home
hospital’s (or hospitals’) direct and
indirect FTE caps of at least the same
amount. The sum total of adjustments to
all the participating hospitals’ FTE caps
under the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement may not exceed the
aggregate adjusted FTE caps of the
hospitals participating in the emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group. A home
hospital’s IME and direct GME FTE cap
reductions in an emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreement are limited to
the home hospital’s IME and direct GME
FTE resident caps at § 413.79(c) or
§ 413.79(f)(1) through (f)(5), that is, as
adjusted by any and all existing
affiliation agreements as applicable.
(E) Attach copies of all existing
Medicare GME affiliation agreements
and emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreements in which the
hospital is participating at the time the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement is executed.
(ii) Time for submission of the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement. For the year during which
the section 1135 emergency was
declared, each participating hospital
must submit an emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreement to CMS and
submit a copy to the CMS fiscal
intermediary by the later of 180 days
after the section 1135 emergency period
begins or by June 30 of the academic
year in which the emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreement is effective.
Emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreements for the subsequent 2
academic years must be submitted by
the later of 180 days after the section
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
1135 emergency period begins or by July
1 of each year.
(iii) Exemption from the Shared
Rotational Arrangement Requirement.
During the effective period of the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement, hospitals in the emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group are not
required to participate in a shared
rotational arrangement as defined at
§ 413.75(b).
(iv) Host Hospital Exception from the
Rolling Average for the Period from
August 29, 2005 to June 30, 2006. To
determine the FTE resident count for a
host hospital that is training residents in
excess of its cap, a two step process will
be applied. First, subject to the limit at
paragraph (f)(6)(i)(D) of this section, a
host hospital is to exclude the displaced
FTE residents that are counted by a host
hospital in excess of the hospital’s cap
pursuant to an emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreement from August
29, 2005, to June 30, 2006, from the
current year’s FTE resident count before
applying the three-year rolling averaging
rules under § 413.75 (d) to calculate the
average FTE resident count. Second, the
displaced FTE residents that are
counted by the host hospital in excess
of the host hospital’s cap pursuant to an
emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement from August 29, 2005, to June
30, 2006, are added to the hospital’s 3year rolling average FTE resident count
to determine the host hospital’s FTE
resident count for payment purposes.
*
*
*
*
*
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance
Program)
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance; and Program No. 93.774,
Medicare—Supplementary Medical
Insurance Program)
Dated: March 31, 2006.
Mark B. McClellan,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
Approved: April 4, 2006.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06–3492 Filed 4–7–06; 3 pm]
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
[IB Docket No. 04–226; FCC 05–91]
48 CFR Part 212
Mandatory Electronic Filing for
International Telecommunications
Services and Other International
Filings
[DFARS Case 2003–D106]
Federal Communications
Commission.
AGENCY:
Final rule, announcement of
effective date.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document announces the
effective date of the rules published in
the Federal Register on July 6, 2005.
The rules eliminate paper filings and
require applicants to file electronically
all applications and other filings related
to international telecommunications
services that can be filed through the
International Bureau Filing System
(IBFS).
The amendments to 47 CFR
63.19(d), 63.21(a), 63.21(h), 63.21(i),
63.25(b), 63.25(c), 63.25(e), 63.53(a)(1),
63.53(a)(2), 63.701 introductory text and
(j); 64.1001(a), 64.1001(f), 64.1002(c)
and 64.1002(e) published at 70 FR
38795, July 6, 2005 are effective April
12, 2006.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peggy Reitzel or JoAnn Ekblad, Policy
Division, International Bureau, (202)
418–1460.
On May
11, 2005 the Commission released a
Report and Order, a summary of which
was published in the Federal Register.
See 70 FR 38795 (July 6, 2005). We
stated that the rules were effective on
August 5, 2005 except for 47 CFR
63.19(d), 63.21(a), 63.21(h), 63.21(i),
63.25(b), 63.25(c), 63.25(e), 63.53(a)(1),
63.53(a)(2), 63.701 introductory text and
(j); 64.1001(a), 64.1001(f), 64.1002(c)
and 64.1002(e) which required approval
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). The information
collection requirements were approved
by OMB. (See OMB Nos. 3060–0357,
3060–0454, 3060–0686, 3060–0944,
3060–1028, 3060–1029.) This
publication satisfies our statement that
the Commission would publish a
document announcing the effective date
of the rules.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
15:11 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
47 CFR Parts 63 and 64
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06–3506 Filed 4–11–06; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18667
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Transition of
Weapons-Related Prototype Projects
to Follow-On Contracts
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: DoD has adopted as final,
with changes, an interim rule amending
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
implement Section 847 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2004. Section 847 authorizes DoD
to carry out a pilot program that permits
the use of streamlined contracting
procedures for the production of items
or processes begun as prototype projects
under other transaction agreements.
DATES: Effective Date: April 12, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Robin Schulze, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L)
DPAP (DARS), IMD 3C132, 3062
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301–3062. Telephone (703) 602–0326;
facsimile (703) 602–0350. Please cite
DFARS Case 2003–D106.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
DoD published an interim rule at 69
FR 63329 on November 1, 2004, to
implement Section 847 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2004 (Pub. L. 108–136). Section
847 authorizes DoD to carry out a pilot
program for follow-on contracting for
the production of items or processes
begun as prototype projects under other
transaction agreements. Contracts and
subcontracts awarded under the
program may be treated as those for the
acquisition of commercial items; and
items or processes acquired under the
program may be treated as developed in
part with Federal funds and in part at
private expense for purposes of
negotiating rights in technical data.
One association submitted comments
on the interim rule. A discussion of the
comments is provided below.
1. Comment: Definition of
nontraditional defense contractor. The
respondent noted that the definition in
the rule is consistent with the statutory
definition at 10 U.S.C. 2173, but stated
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18654-18667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3492]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Parts 412 and 413
[CMS-1531-IFC]
RIN 0938-AO35
Medicare Program; Medicare Graduate Medical Education Affiliation
Provisions for Teaching Hospitals in Certain Emergency Situations
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Interim final rule with comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This interim final rule with comment period will modify the
current Graduate Medical Education (GME) regulations as they apply to
Medicare GME affiliations to provide for greater flexibility during
times of disaster. Specifically, this rule will implement the emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group provisions that will address issues that
may be faced by certain teaching hospitals in the event that residents
who would otherwise have trained at a hospital in an emergency area (as
that term is defined in section 1135(g) of the Social Security Act (the
Act)) are relocated to alternate training sites.
DATES: This interim final rule is effective as of August 29, 2005.
Comment date: To be assured consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m.
on June 12, 2006.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer to file code CMS-1531-IFC.
Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by
facsimile (FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of four ways (no duplicates,
please):
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on specific
issues in this regulation to https://www.cms.hhs.gov/eRulemaking. Click
on the link ``Submit electronic comments on CMS regulations with an
open comment period.'' (Attachments should be in Microsoft Word,
WordPerfect, or Excel; however, we prefer Microsoft Word.)
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments (one original and
two copies) to the following address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS-1531-IFC, P.O. Box 8011, Baltimore, MD
21244-8011.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments (one
original and two copies) to the following address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS-1531-IFC, Mail Stop C4-26-05, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments (one original and two copies) before the
close of the comment period to one of the following addresses. If you
intend to deliver your comments to the Baltimore address, please call
telephone number (410) 786-9994 in advance to schedule your arrival
with one of our staff members.
Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20201; or 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244-1850.
(Because access to the interior of the HHH Building is not readily
available to persons without Federal Government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in the CMS drop slots
located in the main lobby of the building. A stamp-in clock is
available for persons wishing to retain a proof of filing by stamping
in and retaining an extra copy of the comments being filed.)
Comments mailed to the addresses indicated as appropriate for hand
or courier delivery may be delayed and received after the comment
period.
Submission of comments on paperwork requirements. You may submit
comments on this document's paperwork requirements by mailing your
comments to the addresses provided at the end of the ``Collection of
Information Requirements'' section in this document.
For information on viewing public comments, see the beginning of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Truong, (410) 786-6005.
Renate Rockwell, (410) 786-4645.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Submitting Comments: We welcome comments
from the public on all issues set forth in this rule to assist us in
fully considering issues and developing policies. You can assist us by
referencing the file code CMS-1531-IFC and the specific ``issue
identifier'' that precedes the section on which you choose to comment.
Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the
close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable or confidential business
information that is included in a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have been received: https://
www.cms.hhs.gov/eRulemaking. Click on the link ``Electronic Comments on
CMS Regulations'' on that Web site to view public comments.
Comments received timely will be also available for public
inspection as they are received, generally beginning approximately
three weeks after publication of a document, at the headquarters of the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view public comments,
phone 1-800-743-3951.
I. Background
[If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the caption ``BACKGROUND'' at the beginning of your comments.]
[[Page 18655]]
A. Legislative Authority
The stated purpose of section 1135 of the Act is to enable the
Secretary to ensure, to the maximum extent feasible, in any emergency
area and during an emergency period, that sufficient health care items
and services are available to meet the needs of enrollees in Medicare,
Medicaid, and the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).
Section 1135 of the Act authorizes the Secretary, to the extent
necessary to accomplish the statutory purpose, to temporarily waive or
modify the application of certain types of statutory and regulatory
provisions (such as conditions of participation or other certification
requirements, program participation or similar requirements, or pre-
approval requirements) with respect to health care items and services
furnished by health care provider(s) in an emergency area during an
emergency period.
The Secretary's authority under section 1135 of the Act arises in
the event there is an ``emergency area'' and continues during an
``emergency period'' as those terms are defined in the statute. Under
section 1135(g) of the Act, an emergency area is a geographic area in
which there exists an emergency or disaster that is declared by the
President according to the National Emergencies Act or the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, and a public
health emergency declared by the Secretary according to section 319 of
the Public Health Service Act. (Section 319 of the Public Health
Service Act authorizes the Secretary to declare a public health
emergency and take the appropriate action to respond to the emergency,
consistent with existing authorities.) Throughout the remainder of this
discussion, we will refer to such emergency areas and emergency periods
as ``section 1135'' emergency areas and emergency periods.
Section 1871(e)(1)(A) of the Act, as amended by section 903(a)(1)
of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act
of 2003 (MMA) (Pub. L. 108-173), generally prohibits the Secretary from
making retroactive substantive changes in policy unless retroactive
application of the change is necessary to comply with statutory
requirements, or failure to apply the change retroactively would be
contrary to the public interest. Due to the infrastructure damage and
disruption of operations experienced by medical facilities, and the
consequent disruption in residency training, caused by Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita in 2005, there is urgent need for the regulation
changes provided in this interim final rule with comment period to be
applied retroactively. Existing regulations do not adequately address
the issues faced by hospitals that are located in the emergency areas
addressed in this rule, or hospitals that assisted by training
displaced residents from the emergency area. We believe failure to
apply the regulatory changes retroactively would be contrary to the
public interest because hospitals affected by Hurricanes Katrina and
Rita could otherwise face dramatic financial hardship and impede the
recovery of graduate medical education programs in the emergency area.
Specifically, the training programs at many teaching hospitals in
New Orleans and surrounding areas were temporarily closed in the
aftermath of the hurricanes, and the displaced residents were
transferred to other hospitals to continue their training programs in
other parts of the country. While many residents will likely be able to
return to the hurricane-affected hospitals after some period of time,
others may need to remain where they have been transferred for an
extended period of time. A regulatory change is required so that
Medicare graduate medical education (GME) funding can be maintained
while there are displaced residents training at various hospitals
outside of the emergency area even as the hurricane-affected hospitals
incrementally bring residents back in the process of rebuilding their
training programs.
Under section 1886(h) of the Act, as amended by section 9202 of the
Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) of 1985 (Pub. L.
99-272), the Secretary is authorized to make payments to hospitals for
the direct costs of approved GME programs. Section 1886(d)(5)(B) of the
Act provides that prospective payment hospitals that have residents in
an approved GME program receive an additional payment for a Medicare
discharge to reflect the higher patient care costs of teaching
hospitals, that is, the indirect graduate medical education (IME)
costs. Sections 1886(h)(4)(F) and 1886(d)(5)(B)(v) of the Act
established limits on the number of allopathic and osteopathic
residents that hospitals may count for purposes of calculating direct
GME payments and the IME adjustment, respectively, thereby establishing
hospital-specific direct GME and IME full-time equivalent (FTE)
resident caps. However, under the authority granted by section
1886(h)(4)(H)(ii) of the Act, the Secretary may issue rules to allow
institutions that are members of the same affiliated group to apply
their direct GME and IME FTE resident caps on an aggregate basis
through a Medicare GME affiliation agreement. The Secretary's
regulations permit hospitals, through a Medicare GME affiliation
agreement, to adjust IME and direct GME FTE resident caps to reflect
the rotation of residents among affiliated hospitals. The current
regulation at Sec. 413.75(b), implementing Medicare GME affiliations,
specifies that hospitals may only form a Medicare GME affiliated group
with other hospitals if they are in the same or contiguous urban or
rural areas, if they are under common ownership, or if they are jointly
listed as program sponsors or major participating institutions in the
same program. The existing regulations do not provide for hospitals
whose residency programs have been disrupted in an emergency area to
enter into valid Medicare GME affiliation agreements with host
hospitals where the hospitals may not meet the regulatory requirements
for Medicare GME affiliations. Therefore, through this interim final
rule with comment period, we are supplementing the regulations at Sec.
413.75(b) and Sec. 413.79(f) with provisions for emergency Medicare
GME affiliated groups to provide relief to hospitals with disrupted
residency programs in an emergency area. These provisions are being
made effective retroactive to August 29, 2005.
B. Overview of Medicare Direct GME and IME
As we discussed in the previous section, the Medicare program makes
payments to teaching hospitals to account for two types of costs, the
direct costs (direct GME) and the indirect costs (IME) of a hospital's
graduate medical education program. Direct GME payments represent the
direct costs of training residents (for example, resident salaries,
fringe benefits, and teaching physician costs associated with an
approved GME program) and generally are calculated by determining the
product of the Medicare patient load (that is, the percentage of the
hospital's Medicare inpatient days), the hospital's per resident
payment amount, and the weighted number of FTE residents training at
the hospital during the cost reporting period.
The IME adjustment is made to teaching hospitals for the additional
indirect patient care costs attributable to teaching activities. For
example, teaching hospitals typically offer more technologically
advanced treatments to their patients, and therefore, patients who are
sicker and need more sophisticated treatment are more likely
[[Page 18656]]
to go to teaching hospitals. Furthermore, there are additional costs
related to the presence of inefficiencies associated with teaching
residents resulting from the additional tests or procedures ordered by
residents and the demands put on physicians who supervise, and staff
who support, the residents. IME payments are made as a percentage add-
on adjustment to the per discharge Hospital Inpatient Prospective
Payment System (IPPS) payment, and are calculated based on the
hospital's ratio of FTE residents to available beds as defined at Sec.
412.105(b). The statutory formula for calculating the IME adjustment
is: c x [(1 + r)\.405\ - 1], where ``r'' represents the hospital's
ratio of FTE residents to beds, and ``c'' represents an IME multiplier,
which is set by the Congress.
The amount of IME payment a hospital receives for a particular
discharge is dependent upon the number of FTE residents the hospital
trains, the hospital's number of available beds, the current level of
the statutory IME multiplier, and the per discharge IPPS payment.
Sections 1886(d)(5)(B)(v) and 1886(h)(4)(F) of the Act established
hospital specific limits (that is, caps) on the number of allopathic
and osteopathic FTE residents that hospitals may count for purposes of
calculating indirect and direct GME payments, respectively.
C. Effect of Existing Regulations
As explained above, the Secretary's authority under section 1135 of
the Act is prompted by the occurrence of an emergency or disaster that
leads to designation of a section 1135 emergency area, and continues
throughout a section 1135 emergency period. For example, when Hurricane
Katrina occurred on August 29, 2005, disrupting health care operations
and medical residency training programs at teaching hospitals in New
Orleans and the surrounding area, the conditions were met for an
emergency area and emergency period under section 1135(g) of the Act.
Under section 1135 of the Act, the Secretary was then authorized to
waive a number of provisions to ensure that sufficient services would
be available in the section 1135 emergency area to meet the needs of
Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP patients. Shortly after Hurricane Katrina
occurred, we were informed by hospitals in New Orleans that the
training programs at many teaching hospitals in the city were closed as
a result of the disaster and that the displaced residents were being
transferred to training programs at host hospitals in other parts of
the country. For purpose of discussion in this rule, a host hospital is
a hospital that trains residents displaced from a training program in a
section 1135 emergency area. A home hospital is a hospital that meets
all of the following: (1) Is located in a section 1135 emergency area
(2) had its inpatient bed occupancy decreased by 20 percent or more due
to the disaster so that it is unable to train the number of residents
it originally intended to train in that academic year, and (3) needs to
send the displaced residents to train at a host hospital.
Immediately after Hurricane Katrina, home and host hospitals
petitioned CMS for a mechanism to allow host hospitals to count the
displaced FTE residents they would be training for direct GME and IME
payment purposes. In response to the petitions, we immediately issued a
Question and Answer (Q&A), which cited provisions in existing
regulations at Sec. 413.79(h). Section 413.79(h) allows home hospitals
that closed, or closed one or more residency training programs, to
temporarily transfer FTE residents to host hospitals and allows host
hospitals that were already training residents at or above their FTE
resident caps to count those displaced residents for direct GME and IME
payment (see the CMS Q&A's Web site: https://questions.cms.hhs.gov (the
Web site link is located at ID 5696)).
As specified at Sec. 413.79(h), Medicare considers a program at a
hospital to be closed if ``* * * the hospital ceases to offer training
for residents in a particular approved medical residency training
program.'' Section 413.79(h) also defines closure of a hospital as when
a hospital ``* * * terminates its Medicare agreement under the
provisions of Sec. 489.52 * * *.'' The regulations at Sec. 413.79(h)
allow a host hospital that accepts residents from the closed program to
receive a temporary increase in its IME and direct GME resident caps
for those residents as long as the home hospital agrees to a
corresponding temporary reduction to its own caps. The host hospital
under the closed program provisions would receive temporary FTE
resident cap adjustments only as long as the specific resident(s) is
displaced (and only as long as the home hospital or home hospital's
program remains closed). Therefore, once the resident(s) completes
training in the program that he or she was training in when the program
closed, or he or she returns to train at the home hospital, no
additional FTE resident cap adjustments for the host hospital are
permitted under Sec. 413.79(h). Furthermore, Sec. 413.79(h) specifies
that a host hospital can receive a temporary increase in its FTE
resident caps in order to count displaced FTE residents only if the
proper documentation is submitted to the fiscal intermediaries (FIs) by
both the home and host hospital no later than 60 days after the host
hospital begins to train the displaced resident(s).
In accordance with the authority granted to the Secretary under
section 1135 of the Act, as stated in our Q&A posted on the CMS Web
site, we extended the regulatory 60-day deadline for submitting
documentation to CMS as required by Sec. 413.79(h) and thus allowed
hospitals to submit the documentation by the earlier of the end of the
section 1135 emergency period granted for Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
or by June 30, 2006. The section 1135 emergency period ended on January
31, 2006. We believe the existing regulation at Sec. 413.79(h)
addressed the issue of finding host hospitals for residents displaced
from home hospitals in the immediate aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina
and Rita. However, teaching hospitals in section 1135 emergency areas
have since made us aware of several issues that are not addressed (or
not addressed adequately) under current regulations. For instance, some
of the hurricane-affected programs in New Orleans and elsewhere did not
in fact close entirely. In many cases, a reduced number of residents
continued to train in the hospitals' outpatient departments. Therefore,
those programs at the home hospitals did not actually close, and
neither the home or host hospitals will be able to use the regulatory
provisions at Sec. 413.79(h) to enable host hospitals that are at or
above their FTE resident caps to count displaced residents from home
hospitals for Medicare direct GME and IME purposes. We understand that
even hospitals that had originally completely closed their programs
have been in the process of gradually reopening their programs (that
is, residents are being brought back to the home hospitals in stages).
Therefore, even where a home hospital temporarily closed a program
following the disaster, once it begins training any residents (even a
fraction of an FTE resident) in that program again, the program is no
longer closed and any adjustments made to the host hospital's cap under
the closed program regulation would no longer be allowed. Therefore, we
believe that, in order to remove the disincentive faced by hospitals
that are at or above their FTE resident caps to continue training
displaced residents, some kind of regulatory relief is necessary.
II. Meeting the Needs of Teaching Hospitals Affected by a Disaster
[If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the
[[Page 18657]]
caption ``TEACHING HOSPITALS AFFECTED BY A DISASTER'' at the beginning
of your comments.]
This interim final rule with comment period will amend the Medicare
GME affiliation regulations to address the needs and incentives of home
and host hospitals in the event of an emergency or disaster. In
developing a policy to provide home and host hospitals flexibility in
response to a disaster, we address two priorities. First, we believe
that in disaster situations, to the extent that the statute permits,
the policy should facilitate the continuity of GME, minimizing the
disruption of residency training. Second, the policy should take into
account that the training programs at home hospitals have been severely
disrupted by a disaster and that home hospitals will usually want to
rebuild their GME programs as soon as possible.
A. Overview of the Closed Programs Provisions
As we noted in our Q&A (posted on the CMS Web site), issued in
response to inquiries from hospitals affected by Hurricane Katrina, the
regulations at Sec. 413.79(h) offer a payment policy option that could
be applied in limited situations occurring after a disaster. Thus, a
host hospital would be allowed to make temporary adjustments to its IME
and direct GME caps (limited by the home hospital's IME and direct GME
caps) in order to count displaced residents for direct GME and IME
payment purposes. However, due to the complexity of training programs
where residents train at multiple hospitals (this is a common training
model used throughout the country), there are many potential
difficulties that can arise in applying this policy to address disaster
situations.
Typically, residents in a program spend time training during the
year at multiple hospitals, some of which may have been affected by the
disaster, while others may not have been affected. For example, a first
year resident in a family practice program may spend one third of the
year training at a hospital in New Orleans, and the remaining two-
thirds of the year at other hospitals in Baton Rouge. When the New
Orleans hospital closed due to the hurricane, this resident may have
been training at one of the Baton Rouge hospitals. Therefore, although
the resident was not immediately displaced by the hurricane, since the
resident would have rotated to the New Orleans hospital later in the
year, the resident will ultimately be affected. Conversely, a resident
that was training in New Orleans at the time of the hurricane was
immediately displaced, so even if the resident was transferred to a
host hospital in Texas to continue training, that resident may be able
to continue to train at the unaffected Baton Rouge hospital after
completing a rotation at the host hospital.
Additional complexity can arise through the interaction of the home
and host hospital's FTE resident caps. Each one of the home hospitals
involved in the previous example could be training residents above
their respective IME and direct GME FTE resident caps. Since the closed
program provisions are resident-specific, that is, the host hospital's
cap adjustment is tied to the specific resident who was displaced, as
specified at Sec. 413.79(h), documentation would be required to
account for each resident's FTE time spent training at each of the home
and host hospitals. Additionally, because the policy under Sec.
413.79(h) is resident-specific, the host hospital would only receive a
temporary cap adjustment for as long as the specific residents are
displaced. Therefore, home and host hospitals would need to provide a
very detailed accounting of each resident's training as required at
Sec. 413.79(h).
Hospitals in New Orleans have notified us that in light of the
damage they suffered from the hurricane, documenting the specific
residents, their rotations at the various home and host hospitals (and
the FTEs associated with each rotation) and where the displaced
residents were sent after the hurricane constitutes a major
documentation burden. We note that although CMS extended the
documentation deadline to January 31, 2006, under the authority of
section 1135 of the Act, giving hospitals 5 months from the time of the
hurricane to submit this type of documentation, we are aware of no
hospitals that complied with all of the documentation requirements
listed at Sec. 413.79(h) by the due date. Therefore, due to the
challenges and complexities mentioned above, we believe that the
existing closed program regulations do not adequately address the
issues associated with Medicare direct GME and IME payment policies
that are faced by residency training programs affected by a disaster.
B. Overview of the Medicare GME Affiliation Provisions
Accordingly, we are revising Sec. 413.75(b) to include definitions
of emergency Medicare GME affiliated group, home hospital, host
hospital, section 1135 emergency area, and section 1135 emergency
period. We are also revising Sec. 413.79(f) to set forth the
requirements of an emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement.
The existing definition of Medicare GME affiliated group at Sec.
413.75(b) specifies that hospitals may only form a Medicare GME
affiliated group with other hospitals if they are in the same or
contiguous urban or rural areas, if they are under common ownership, or
if they are jointly listed as program sponsors or major participating
institutions in the same program. The existing Medicare GME affiliation
provisions at Sec. 413.79(f) permit participating teaching hospitals
to aggregate and ``share'' FTE caps during a specified academic year.
The Medicare GME affiliation regulations allow hospitals that need to
either decrease or increase their FTE resident counts to reflect the
normal movement of residents among affiliated hospitals to do so for
the agreed-upon training years.
Hospitals that affiliate must submit a Medicare GME affiliation
agreement, as specified at Sec. 413.75(b), to their Medicare FIs and
to CMS no later than July 1 of the relevant academic year. Each
hospital in the Medicare GME affiliated group must have a shared
rotational arrangement with at least one other hospital within the
Medicare GME affiliated group, and all of the hospitals within the
Medicare GME affiliated group must be connected by a series of shared
rotational arrangements. The net effect of the adjustments to
hospitals' FTE resident caps, whether positive or negative on a
hospital-specific basis, in the aggregate must not exceed zero. While
additional hospitals may not be added to the Medicare GME affiliated
group after July 1 of a year, amendments to the affiliation agreement
to adjust the distribution of the number of FTE residents in the
original Medicare GME affiliation among the hospitals that are part of
the Medicare GME affiliated group can be made through June 30 of the
academic year for which they are effective.
C. Overview of the Emergency Medicare GME Affiliated Group Provision
[If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the caption ``OVERVIEW OF THE EMERGENCY MEDICARE GME AFFILIATED GROUP
PROVISION'' at the beginning of your comments.]
Based on what we have learned about the impact of a disaster on
teaching hospitals, we believe it is necessary to provide hospitals
with greater flexibility to distribute FTE resident caps within a group
of home and host hospitals if there is an emergency at a home hospital
that has resulted in the designation of a section 1135 emergency
[[Page 18658]]
area. We believe that a modified Medicare GME affiliation policy would
allow affected hospitals the maximum degree of flexibility following
the disaster so that residents displaced by the disaster can continue
their residency training at other hospitals, while the home hospitals
can remain committed to reopening their programs.
While there may be hospitals in the section 1135 emergency area
that do not experience a disruption in residency training due to the
disaster, the provisions in this rule are only intended to help home
hospitals, that is, hospitals that have been directly affected by the
disaster to the extent that their inpatient bed occupancy is
diminished, limiting the hospital's ability to train residents. In
determining whether a hospital in a section 1135 emergency area
qualifies as a home hospital, we believe it is appropriate to compare
the inpatient bed occupancy of the hospital one week before the earlier
of the date the section 1135 emergency period begins, or the date on
which the hospital began any evacuation efforts in anticipation of an
event that results in the declaration of a section 1135 emergency area,
to the inpatient bed occupancy of the hospital one week after the
section 1135 emergency period begins. If the inpatient bed occupancy
decreases by 20 percent or more between these two comparison
timeframes, we believe that the significant drop in occupancy can be
assumed to be the result of the event that led to the declaration of a
section 1135 emergency period. We believe a hospital that experiences
such a drop in occupancy may not have enough patients to continue to
provide for adequate residency training, and therefore, may need to
send residents to host hospitals. The emergency Medicare GME
regulations are applicable to these home hospitals. These emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group provisions in Sec. 413.79(f)(6) are
effective as of the date of the first day of a section 1135 emergency
period (for example, in the case of Hurricane Katrina, they are
effective on August 29, 2005). The duration of these emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreements is limited to the remainder of the academic
year during which the section 1135 emergency period began, plus two
additional academic years. Thus, an emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement is permitted to remain in effect for no more than 3 training
years, beginning with the first day of the section 1135 emergency
period. (An emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement could remain
in effect for three full academic years only if the first day of a
section 1135 emergency period occurred on July 1.)
For example, in the case of Hurricane Katrina, an emergency
Medicare GME affiliation could be effective from August 29, 2005, to
June 30, 2006 (we refer to this as the first effective year); the
affiliation could also be effective for two subsequent academic years:
the second effective year of the emergency Medicare GME affiliation
would be from July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007, and the third effective
year would be from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008. At the conclusion of
the allowable effective period for an emergency Medicare GME affiliated
group, the emergency provisions at Sec. 413.79(f)(6) cease to apply,
and the existing provisions for Medicare GME affiliation agreements at
Sec. 413.79(f)(1) through (5) would apply.
We believe that the limits on the allowable effective period for
emergency Medicare GME affiliated group serve to maintain GME funding
over a sufficient period to allow home hospitals to rebuild their GME
programs, while also supporting the continuity of residency training.
We welcome public comments on whether the allowable effective period is
sufficient time to accommodate rebuilding of residency programs at home
hospitals.
D. Emergency Medicare GME Affiliated Group Provisions
1. Affiliation Agreement
To provide home hospitals with more flexibility to train displaced
residents at various sites, and to allow host hospitals to count
displaced residents for IME and direct GME, home hospitals may enter
into emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreements effective
retroactive to the date of the first day of the section 1135 emergency
period.
The emergency Medicare GME affiliated group may include hospitals
that would not meet the requirements for a Medicare GME affiliated
group as specified as Sec. 413.75(b). Specifically, for these
emergency Medicare GME affiliated groups, home hospitals may affiliate
with host hospitals anywhere in the country because we recognize that
immediately following a disaster, home hospitals need flexibility to
assign displaced residents to any available program. As home hospitals
recover the ability to train residents after a disaster, the emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group provisions allow home hospitals to return
residents to their training sites, thereby giving home hospitals the
opportunity to rebuild their programs incrementally.
For the year during which the section 1135 emergency was declared,
each hospital participating in the emergency affiliation must submit a
copy of the emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement, as specified
under Sec. 413.79(f)(6), to CMS and the CMS FI servicing each hospital
in the agreement by the later of 180 days after the section 1135
emergency period begins or by June 30 of the relevant training year.
Emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreements for the subsequent 2
academic years must be submitted by the later of 180 days after the
section 1135 emergency period begins or by July 1 of each of the years.
Amendments to the emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement to
adjust the distribution of the number of FTE residents in the original
emergency Medicare GME affiliation among the hospitals that are part of
the emergency Medicare GME affiliated group can be made through June 30
of the academic year for which they are effective. The emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement must be written, signed, and dated
by responsible representatives of each participating hospital and must:
(1) List each participating hospital and its provider number, and
specify whether the hospital is a home or host hospital; (2) specify
the effective period of the emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement; (3) list each participating hospital's IME and direct GME
FTE caps in effect for the current academic year before the emergency
Medicare GME affiliation (that is, if the hospital was already a member
of a regular Medicare GME affiliated group before entering into the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation, the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation must be premised on the FTE caps of the hospital as
adjusted per the regular Medicare GME affiliation agreement, and not
include any slots gained under section 422 of the MMA); and (4) specify
the total adjustment to each hospital's FTE caps in each year that the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement is in effect, for both
direct GME and IME, that reflects a positive adjustment to the host
hospital's direct and indirect FTE caps that is offset by a negative
adjustment to the home hospital's (or hospitals') direct and indirect
FTE caps of at least the same amount. The sum total of adjustments to
all the participating hospitals' FTE caps under the emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreement may not exceed the aggregate adjusted caps of
the hospitals participating in the emergency Medicare GME affiliated
group. A home hospital's IME and direct GME FTE cap reductions under an
emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement are limited to the
[[Page 18659]]
home hospital's IME and direct GME FTE resident caps in effect for the
academic year in accordance with regulations at Sec. 413.79(c)(1)
through (c)(3) or Sec. 413.75(b), that is, the hospital's base year
FTE resident caps as adjusted by any and all existing affiliation
agreements.
In addition to meeting the requirements for an emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreement, a host hospital will be required to document
that any FTE residents counted pursuant to the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement are, in fact, displaced residents from a program
located in the emergency area. That is, the host hospital will need to
provide the FI with a list of resident names and social security
numbers, and the name of the original sponsor of the program located at
the home hospital in the emergency area for each displaced resident. We
note that the hospital is already required, as specified at Sec.
413.75(d), to provide much of this information in order to include any
resident in its FTE count for a particular cost reporting period. We
are adding the requirement that a host hospital document the original
program sponsor of each displaced resident it is training in order to
document that any additional FTE residents counted pursuant to the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement are indeed due to training
of displaced residents. Providing appropriate and sufficient
documentation permits the FI to properly reconcile the correct FTE
resident count for each hospital.
2. Multiple Affiliations
In many cases, home hospitals will already have Medicare GME
affiliation agreements in effect before the section 1135 emergency
period, and may be entering into emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreements with host hospitals that will already have regular Medicare
GME affiliation agreements in effect. Therefore, such situations will
lead to multiple layers of Medicare GME affiliations. It is critical
that the emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreements accurately state
the appropriate caps for each hospital in the affiliated group in order
for the FIs to pay the hospitals correctly. The hospitals must attach
copies of all existing Medicare GME affiliation agreements (that is, a
hospital's regular or other emergency Medicare GME affiliations already
in place for the year) when submitting the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement to the FI so that the FI can verify and reconcile
the cap adjustments. For example, if a home hospital has a direct GME
cap of 100 but has an existing affiliation agreement before the
disaster in which it reduced its cap by 40 FTEs, then, for purposes of
entering into the emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement, it has
an adjusted direct GME cap of 60 with which to affiliate under the
emergency affiliation provisions. The emergency Medicare GME
affiliation provisions are different from the regular Medicare GME
affiliation provisions in that regular Medicare GME affiliations are
based upon the hospitals' FTE resident caps before any adjustments
resulting from Medicare GME affiliation agreements. Because they are
likely to occur during an academic year, and cannot be anticipated
before the beginning of the year, emergency Medicare GME affiliations
are based upon hospitals' FTE resident caps as they are already
modified by any existing Medicare GME affiliation agreement(s).
In order to provide each hospital with its correct payment, the CMS
FIs involved need to be aware of both regular Medicare GME affiliation
agreements and any emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreements in
which a hospital is participating. Without the correct information on
each hospital's Medicare GME affiliation agreements (whether regular or
emergency affiliations), hospitals could be paid improperly for direct
GME and IME based on application of incorrect FTE resident caps that do
not reflect all Medicare GME affiliation agreements in effect (that is,
regular and emergency affiliations).
Furthermore, to determine direct GME and IME payments under an
emergency Medicare GME affiliation, the normal FTE-counting rules as
specified at Sec. 413.78 will apply. For example, residents beyond the
initial residency period are counted at .5 FTE for direct GME purposes.
The existing IME FTE-counting rules as specified at Sec. 412.105(f)
apply in determining the IME adjustment. Therefore, when the CMS FI
settles a cost report for a hospital in which an emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement is reflected, each participating hospital would
be held to its adjusted IME and adjusted direct GME caps as agreed to
and specified in the emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement.
We note that in the IPPS final rule published in the Federal
Register on August 11, 2004 (69 FR 49142), we state ``* * * hospitals
that receive section 422 cap increases from CMS and participate in a
Medicare GME affiliation agreement under Sec. 413.79(f) on or after
July 1, 2005 may only affiliate for the purposes of adjusting their
1996 FTE caps (adjusted for new programs and any other reductions under
section 1886(h)(7)(A) of the Act) for direct GME and IME. The
additional slots that a hospital receives under section 422 of the MMA
may not be aggregated and applied to the FTE resident caps of any other
hospitals.'' Similarly, we are providing that any slots gained under
section 422 of the MMA may not be used in any emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement.
We are providing examples below of the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreements and discussing the ramifications of the
provisions.
Example I
For the training year beginning on July 1, 2005, Hospital A and
Hospital B have a regular Medicare GME affiliation agreement in which
Hospital A (which has IME and direct GME caps of 20 FTEs) agrees to
transfer 10 FTEs to Hospital B (which has IME and direct GME caps of 15
FTEs). Under the regular affiliation agreement, Hospital B now has
adjusted caps of 25 FTEs and Hospital A has adjusted caps of 10 FTEs
for both IME and direct GME. As a result of Hurricane Zeta on November
1, 2005, Hospital A sustained damage to its inpatient facilities
(reducing its occupancy by 20 percent or more) and has displaced
residents that it needs to send to other hospitals for training.
Hospital A is located in a section 1135 emergency area, and the first
day of the section 1135 emergency period is November 1, 2005. In this
case, Hospital A is a home hospital as defined under Sec. 413.75(b),
and is permitted to enter into an emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement as specified at Sec. 413.79(f)(6).
In Example I above, Hospital B was not affected by the hurricane
(that is, Hospital B was able to continue training residents at the
same level it was before the hurricane, and is training the maximum
number of residents under its FTE caps as adjusted by the existing
Medicare GME affiliation agreement with Hospital A). We note that
Hospitals A and B may modify their regular Medicare GME affiliation
agreement, if necessary, no later than June 30, 2006, under the
requirements as specified at Sec. 413.79(f)(5). In this case, Hospital
B does not qualify as a home hospital since its inpatient occupancy was
not reduced by 20 percent or more even though it was located in the
area covered by the section 1135 waiver. Hospital A elects to enter
into an emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement with host
Hospitals C and D in two other States because those
[[Page 18660]]
hospitals are well-situated to provide residents displaced from
Hospital A with an appropriate training experience.
Accordingly, all of the hospitals (A, C, and D) in the emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group must submit copies of the emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement to CMS and to the CMS FIs servicing
the hospitals participating in the emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement by June 30, 2006 (in this case, June 30, 2006 is the later of
180 days after the section 1135 emergency period begins (November 1,
2005) or by June 30 of the relevant training year). In Table I below,
we list the FTE resident cap information that the emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreement, included for the first effective period,
which was submitted to CMS and the CMS FI on June 30, 2006.
Table I.--Emergency Medicare GME Affiliation Agreement Due to Hurricane Zeta for Effective Period--November 1,
2005 to June 30, 2006
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjusted
IME cap before Direct GME cap Adjusted IME Direct GME cap
Hospital name Provider No. emergency before cap under the under the
affiliation emergency emergency emergency
affiliation affiliation affiliation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hospital A...................... 19-9999 10 10 1 (-9) 1 (-9)
Hospital C...................... 45-9999 10 10 14 (+4) 14 (+4)
Hospital D...................... 33-9999 10 10 15 (+5) 15 (+5)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As indicated in Example I above, Hospital B was not affected by the
hurricane, and therefore did not participate in an emergency Medicare
GME affiliated group. However, Hospital A is required to attach a copy
of the existing Medicare GME affiliation agreement it has with Hospital
B to the emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement submitted to CMS
and its FI to document its adjusted cap of 10 FTEs. Hospitals C and D
are similarly required to attach copies of all existing Medicare GME
affiliation agreements that they may be participating in as of July 1,
2005, (including any regular or emergency affiliation agreements) in
order to document their caps.
To further illustrate this policy continuing with the above
example, Hospital C, which has an adjusted direct GME cap under the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation of 14 FTEs, could count up to four
displaced FTE residents during the first effective year assuming that
Hospital C can document that these FTEs are from programs in the
section 1135 emergency area. However, upon cost report settlement, the
CMS FI determined that Hospital C has actually trained a total of 16
FTEs during the cost reporting period. Since each participating
hospital will be held to their adjusted IME and adjusted direct GME
caps as agreed to and specified in the emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement, the CMS FI would only allow four of the six
additional FTEs Hospital C trained pursuant to the emergency Medicare
GME affiliation agreement.
Example II
Alternatively, assume that both Hospitals A and B from Example I
above are affected by the same hurricane, both qualify as a home
hospital, and both need to participate in an emergency Medicare GME
affiliation with host Hospitals C and D in the other States.
We note that while Hospitals A and B may modify their existing
Medicare GME affiliation agreement on or before June 30, 2006,
Hospitals A and B may find it easier to reflect the changes in training
(and the resultant shift of FTE resident caps) due to Hurricane Zeta
through the emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement. In this
scenario, Hospitals A and B may execute an emergency Medicare GME
affiliation agreement in which the emergency Medicare GME affiliated
group includes Hospitals A, B, C, and D. In Table II below, we list the
FTE cap information that the emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement included for the first effective period, which was submitted
to CMS and the CMS FI on June 30, 2006.
Table II.--Emergency Medicare GME Affiliation Agreement Due to Hurricane Zeta for Effective Period-- November 1,
2005 to June 30, 2006
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjusted
IME cap before Direct GME cap Adjusted IME Direct GME cap
Hospital name Provider No. emergency before cap under the under the
affiliation emergency emergency emergency
affiliation affiliation affiliation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hospital A...................... 19-9999 10 10 1 (-9) 1 (-9)
Hospital B...................... 19-8999 25 25 10 (-15) 10 (-15)
Hospital C...................... 45-9999 10 10 19 (+9) 19 (+9)
Hospital D...................... 33-9999 10 10 25 (+15) 25 (+15)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We note that the pre-existing regular Medicare GME affiliation
agreement between Hospitals A and B which pre-dated the disaster is
still in effect according to existing affiliation agreement rules;
therefore Hospitals A and B must account for any FTE resident cap
transfers specified in the regular affiliation agreement when they
enter into the emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement with host
Hospitals C and D. In addition, a copy of Hospital A and B's regular
Medicare GME affiliation agreement must be attached to the emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement that is submitted to CMS and the
hospitals' CMS FIs.
3. Submission Process
Submissions of emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreements should
be sent to:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Division of Acute Care,
Attention: Elizabeth Truong or Renate Rockwell, Mailstop C4-08-06, 7500
[[Page 18661]]
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244.
``Emergency Medicare GME Affiliation Agreement'' should be clearly
labeled on the outside envelope.
4. Application of Existing Rules
[If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the caption ``APPLICATION OF EXISTING RULES'' at the beginning of your
comments.]
a. New Teaching Hospitals
Immediately after a disaster, home hospitals are in the best
position to determine where their residents should be sent to continue
with their residency training. Although home hospitals may send their
residents to train at existing teaching hospitals, in some cases,
hospitals affected by a disaster may need to send residents to non-
teaching hospitals (that is, hospitals that have not included any
residents training in approved medical residency training programs on a
previous Medicare cost report) to continue their training.
The following discussion is intended to inform hospitals of how CMS
will determine the GME payments to the host hospital in the case where
home hospitals choose to send displaced residents to host hospitals
that were previously non-teaching hospitals. These host hospitals will
become new teaching hospitals once they begin to train residents from
the home hospitals as part of an approved medical residency training
program. As a new teaching hospital, such a hospital initially will
have IME and direct GME FTE resident caps of zero (based on the number
of residents training in the 1996 base year for FTE resident caps).
However, the new teaching hospital, by participating in an emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement, can receive a temporary cap
increase in order to count the displaced FTE residents for purposes of
IME and direct GME payments.
As a new teaching hospital, the hospital will not have an existing
per resident amount for direct GME payment purposes. The per resident
amounts for these hospitals will be established as specified at Sec.
413.77(e) (just as any other new teaching hospital would have its per
resident amount established). The new teaching hospital's per resident
amount is established based on the lower of the hospital's direct GME
costs per resident in its base year, or the updated weighted mean value
of the per resident amounts of all hospitals located in the same
geographic wage area as specified at Sec. 413.77. Therefore, it is
very important for a new teaching host hospital to incur direct GME
costs in its base year and to document all of the direct GME costs it
incurs (for example, the residents' salaries, fringe benefits, any
portion of the teaching physician salaries attributable to GME, and
other direct GME costs) for the displaced residents it is training;
otherwise the host hospital risks being assigned a very low per
resident amount in accordance with our regulations. If the host, new
teaching hospital incurs no GME costs in the relevant base year, its
per resident amount would be zero dollars. We advise hospitals to refer
to the provisions at Sec. 413.77(e) for the rules concerning the
establishment of a new teaching hospital's per resident amount. In
accordance with section 1886(h) of the Act and our regulations at Sec.
413.77, once the base year per resident amount is established, it is
fixed and not subject to adjustment to reflect costs incurred in years
subsequent to the base year that might be associated with new programs
or additional residents.
b. Shared Rotational Requirements
As specified at Sec. 413.79(f)(2), each hospital in a regular
Medicare GME affiliated group must have a shared rotational arrangement
with at least one other hospital participating in the Medicare GME
affiliation agreement. All of the hospitals within the Medicare GME
affiliated group would therefore be connected by a series of shared
rotational arrangements. As defined at Sec. 413.75(b), a shared
rotational arrangement ``means a residency training program under which
a resident(s) participates in training at two or more hospitals in that
program.'' We are specifying at Sec. 413.79(f)(6) that hospitals that
are members of an emergency Medicare GME affiliated group are not
required to participate in a shared rotational arrangement with the
other hospitals participating in the emergency Medicare GME affiliation
agreement. We are implementing this provision because we recognize that
members of an emergency Medicare GME affiliated group may be
geographically dispersed across the country, which would make it
difficult for residents to participate in shared rotational
arrangements. Additionally, after a disaster, affected hospitals may
not have the resources available to participate in shared rotational
arrangements with host hospitals situated around the country. For
example, hospitals may not have the financial capability to
continuously transport residents between States. Therefore, we are
exempting participants in emergency Medicare GME affiliations from the
shared rotational requirements.
c. Weighted FTE Counts (``3-Year Rolling Average'')
As specified at Sec. 412.105(f)(1)(v) and Sec. 413.79(d), a ``3-
year rolling average'' is applied to a hospital's count of FTE
residents to calculate IME and direct GME payments for a cost reporting
period (that is, the number of FTEs used to calculate payments is the
average of the number of FTE residents reported for the current year,
the prior year, and the penultimate year). For example, if the hospital
trained 115 FTE residents (for IME) in the current cost reporting
period, 100 FTEs in the prior cost reporting period, and 100 FTEs in
the penultimate cost reporting period, then the IME payment would not
be based solely on the 115 residents trained in the current year.
Rather, the IME payment in the current year would be based on the 3-
year rolling average FTE count (that is, (115 + 100 + 100) / 3 which
equals 105 FTEs).
Thus, if a hospital increases its number of FTE residents, as a
result of the 3-year rolling average rule, the hospital would be able
to count only one third of the additional FTE residents in that year,
two-thirds of the additional FTEs for the next year, and the full
number in the third year (assuming there are no other changes in the
number of FTE residents training in subsequent years). Conversely, if a
hospital decreases its number of FTE residents in the current year,
then the 3-year rolling average minimizes the effect of the reduced GME
payments based on the reduced level of training over the next 3 years.
Home hospitals that have reduced the number of FTE residents training
at their hospitals would benefit under this provision since only one-
third of the FTE resident reduction will apply in the first cost
reporting year in which an emergency period is declared. The 3-year
rolling average provision, as specified at Sec. 412.105 and Sec.
413.79(d), will be applied to all hospitals in the emergency Medicare
GME affiliation, and their associated FTE resident counts while the
agreement is in effect. This provision is the same as applied under
existing regulations in which hospitals participating in a Medicare GME
affiliation agreement(s) are subject to the 3-year rolling average.
However, there is an exception to the application of the 3-year
rolling average rules for closed program and closed hospital
regulations as specified at Sec. 413.79(d)(6). In the case of host
hospitals that participate in emergency Medicare GME affiliated groups
relating to the section 1135 emergency declared
[[Page 18662]]
following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which occurred in 2005, we
understand that, based on the Q&A we posted on the CMS Web site
discussing application of the closed program and closed hospital
regulations to these hospitals, there was an expectation among host
hospitals that the displaced FTE residents they accepted for training
would be exempt from application of the 3-year rolling average, and
that the host hospitals would immediately be permitted to include all
of those residents in their FTE resident counts. Many host hospitals,
believing that the existing regulations regarding closed hospitals and
closed programs would be applied, took in displaced residents with the
reasonable expectation that they would be able to count those
additional residents as FTEs not subject to the 3-year rolling average
rules specified at Sec. 412.105 and Sec. 413.79(d). In recognition of
this expectation, we are providing for a time-limited exception to the
3-year rolling average rules so that a host hospital participating in
an emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement relating to Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita and training residents in excess of its cap,
consistent with the rolling average provisions applicable for closed
programs as specified at Sec. 413.79(d)(6), will exclude from the 3-
year rolling average FTE residents associated with displaced residents
from August 29, 2005, to June 30, 2006. All host hospitals in an
emergency Medicare GME affiliated group will be subject to the existing
3-year rolling average requirements beginning on July 1, 2006.
Accordingly, we revised Sec. 413.79(f) by adding a new paragraph
(6) to provide for more flexibility in Medicare GME affiliations for
home hospitals located in section 1135 emergency areas to allow the
home hospitals to efficiently find training sites for displaced
residents. Under the flexibility provided by the emergency Medicare GME
affiliated group provisions as specified at Sec. 413.79(f)(6),
decisions regarding the transfer of FTE resident cap slots, including
how to address situations where the home hospital was training a number
of residents in excess of its cap before the disaster, and the tracking
of those FTE resident slots, would be left to the home and host
hospitals to work out among themselves. The home and host hospitals
are, however, required to include much of this information in their
emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreements as specified under Sec.
413.79(f)(6). Furthermore, since hospitals may amend the emergency
Medicare GME affiliation agreement (on or before June 30 of the
relevant academic year) to reflect the actual training situation among
the hospitals participating in the emergency Medicare GME affiliated
group, hospitals are provided with greater flexibility to accommodate
any changing residency training circumstances within the emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group. We note that the emergency Medicare GME
affiliated group provisions promulgated herein are intended for the
purpose of providing for continued training of residents displaced from
a section 1135 emergency area, and not to enable hospitals to merely
shift and change FTE resident caps with other hospitals in the country
(for instance, in order to maximize Medicare IME and direct GME
payments).
III. Provisions of the Interim Final Rule
[If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the caption ``PROVISIONS OF THE INTERIM FINAL RULE'' at the beginning
of your comments.]
We are revising the Medicare GME regulations at Sec. 412.105,
Sec. 413.75(b), and Sec. 413.79(f) to implement an emergency Medicare
GME affiliated group policy that will only apply to certain home
hospitals in a section 1135 emergency area and host hospitals that
accept displaced residents from a home hospital.
Section 412.105 Special Treatment: Hospitals That Incur Indirect Costs
for Graduate Medical Education Programs
In Sec. 412.105, we revised paragraph (a)(1)(i) to specify that
special treatment for hospitals that incur indirect costs for GME
programs also applies to the emergency Medicare GME affiliated groups.
In addition, we revised paragraph (f)(1)(vi) to specify that
hospitals that are part of the same Medicare GME affiliated group or
emergency Medicare GME affiliate group may elect to apply the limit at
paragraph (f)(1)(iv) of this section on an aggregate basis, as
specified in Sec. 413.97(f).
Section 413.75 Direct GME Payments: General Requirements
In Sec. 413.75(b), we added the definition of an ``Emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group,'' and within this definition, we specify
the meaning of ``Home hospital'' and ``Host hospital,'' and we define
``Section 1135 emergency area or section 1135 emergency period.''
Section 413.79 Direct GME Payments: Determination of the Weighted
Number of FTE Residents
In Sec. 413.79(f), we revised the introductory text to specify
that a hospital may receive a temporary adjustment to its FTE cap,
which, except as provided in subsection (6)(iv), is subject to the
averaging rules at Sec. 413.79(d), to reflect residents added or
subtracted because the hospital is participating in a Medicare GME
affiliated group or an emergency Medicare GME affiliated group as
defined at Sec. 413.75(b).
In Sec. 413.79(f)(6), we set forth the requirements for emergency
Medicare GME affiliated group.
In paragraph (f)(6)(i), we specify the requirements for the
emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement that each hospital
participating in the emergency Medicare GME affiliated group must
submit. Specifically, each participating hospital must submit an
emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement that is written, signed,
and dated by responsible representatives of each participating
hospital, and the emergency Medicare GME affiliation agreement must
include the following:
Specify the effective period of the emergency Medic