Institute of Museum and Library Services; Proposed Collection, Comment Request, User Satisfaction With Access to Government Information and Services at Public Libraries and Public Access Computing Centers, 18778-18779 [06-3487]
Download as PDF
18778
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Notices
4, 2006. Those wishing to speak must
sign up at the meeting registration desk
by 6 p.m. on May 3, 2006. Members of
the public are also welcome to file a
written statement at the time of the
meeting. Verbal presentations and
written comments should be confined to
the subject of priorities and program
mix in NASA’s space and earth science
programs. Findings and
recommendations developed by the
Subcommittees during the Conference
will be submitted to the Science
Committee of the NAC.
It is imperative that the meeting be
held on these dates to accommodate the
scheduling priorities of the key
participants. Attendees will be
requested to sign a visitor’s register.
Dated: April 6, 2006.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer,
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–5420 Filed 4–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND HUMANITIES
Institute of Museum and Library
Services; Proposed Collection,
Comment Request, User Satisfaction
With Access to Government
Information and Services at Public
Libraries and Public Access
Computing Centers
ACTION:
Notice.
I. Background
The Institute of Museum and
Library Services as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to
provide the general public and Federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C.
3508(2)(a)]. This program helps to
ensure that requested data can be
provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial
resources) is minimized, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
the impact of collection requirements on
respondents can be properly assessed.
Currently the Institute of Museum and
Library Services is soliciting comments
concerning a survey to assess user
satisfaction with access to government
information and services at public
libraries and public access computing
centers.
A copy of the proposed information
collection request can be obtained by
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:56 Apr 11, 2006
contacting the individual listed below
in the addressee section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before
June 12, 2006.
IMLS is particularly interested in
comments that help the agency to:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collocation of information
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used:
• Enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to: Rebecca
Danvers, PhD, Director of Research and
Technology, Institute of Museum and
Library Services, 1800 M St., NW., 9th
floor, Washington, DC 20036, telephone:
202–653–4680, fax: 202–653–4625 or by
e-mail at rdanvers@imls.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 208001
The Institute of Museum and Library
Servicdes is an independent Federal
grant-making agency authorized by the
Museum and Library Services Act, 20
U.S.C. 9101, et seq. The IMLS provides
a variety of grant programs to assist the
nation’s museums and libraries in
improving their operations and
enhancing their services to the public.
Museums and libraries of all sizes and
types may receive support from IMLS
programs. This solicitation is to collect
information via surveys on how
satisfied the national public is in
finding government information and
what type of programs public libraries
and community technology centers
provide to help users.
II. Current Action
The core duties of the Institute of
Museum and Library Services, as stated
in its strategic plan, are to promote
excellence in library services and to
promote access to museum and library
services for a diverse public. The EGovernment Act of 2002 called for the
promotion of access to the Internet to
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
provide increased opportunities for
citizen participation in government, and
an interagency committee issued a
report looking at disparities in Internet
access across a demographic spectrum.
Few studies, however, have looked at
the kinds of assistance (training,
tutorials, classes, reference services) that
users are receiving when looking for
federal, state, and local government
information and services, whether via
the Internet or through traditional
means (walk-in, mail, telephone), and
whether users are satisfied with the
assistance that they are receiving from
public libraries and public access
computing centers. In order to address
this critical information gap and to
enhance the quality of library services
nationwide, the Institute of Museum
and Library Services (IMLS) has
undertaken a study to better understand
how users are accessing federal, state,
and local government information and
services and what kinds of assistance
public libraries and other public access
computing centers are offering to users
seeking government information and
services. IMLS is conducting a research
study on how the part of the population
with limited access to Internet resources
(individuals who do not have
broadband access from home, work, or
school; who choose to access
government services and information
from locations other than home, work,
or school; or who do so through
traditional means of access) accesses
federal, state and local government
services and information, and whether
such users are satisfied with the
information and services they are able to
access. Additionally, the study
examines the ways that public libraries
and public access computing centers
provide assistance (e.g., reference
services, tutorials, classes, training) to
users seeking federal, state, and local
government information and services.
Agency: Institute of Museum and
Library Services.
Title: National Study of Users and
Potential Users of Online Information.
OMB Number: n/a.
Agency Number: 3137.
Frequency: On time.
Affected Public: User Satisfaction
with Access to Government Information
and Services at Public Libraries and
Public Access Computing Centers.
Number of Respondents: 5,700.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 or
20 minutes.
Total Burden Hours: 1630.
Total Annualized Capital/Startup
Costs: 0.
Total Annual Costs: $40,792.
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 12, 2006 / Notices
Contact: Rebecca Danvers, PhD,
Director of Research and Technology,
Institute of Museum and Library
Services, 1800 M St., NW., 9th floor,
Washington, DC 20036, telephone: 202–
653–4680, fax: 202–653–4625 or by email at rdanvers@imls.gov.
Dated: April 7, 2006.
Rebecca W. Danvers,
Director, Office of Research and Technology.
[FR Doc. 06–3487 Filed 4–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7036–01–M
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
National Science Board; NSB Election
Committee; Sunshine Act Meeting
Date and Time: Thursday, April 27,
2006, 3 p.m.–4 p.m. (EDT).
Place: National Science Foundation,
Room 1235, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Arlington, VA 22230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Michael P. Crosby, Executive Officer
and NSB Office Director, (703) 292–
7000. www.nsf.gov/nsb.
Status: This meeting will be closed to
the public.
Agenda: Discussion of candidates for
National Science Board Chairman, Vice
Chairman and two vacancies on the
Executive Committee.
(MWt) to 1775 MWt. This represents a
power increase of approximately 16.8
percent, which is considered an
extended power uprate (EPU). As stated
in the NRC staff’s position paper dated
February 8, 1996, on the Boiling-Water
Reactor Extended Power Uprate
Program, the NRC staff will prepare an
environmental impact statement if it
believes a power uprate will have a
significant impact on the human
environment. The NRC staff did not
identify any significant impact from the
information provided in the licensee’s
EPU application for Ginna or the NRC
staff’s independent review; therefore,
the NRC staff is documenting its
environmental review in an
environmental assessment. Also, in
accordance with the position paper, the
Draft Environmental Assessment and
finding of no significant impact is being
published in the Federal Register with
a 30-day public comment period.
Environmental Assessment
Plant Site and Environs
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Ginna is located 6 km (4 mi) north of
Ontario, New York, in the northwest
corner of Wayne County and on the
south shore of Lake Ontario. The
immediate area around Ginna is rural,
with the city of Rochester
approximately 32 km (20 mi) to the west
and Oswego, New York, 64 km (40 mi)
to the east-northeast. The plant consists
of one unit equipped with a nuclear
steam supply system supplied by
Westinghouse Electric Corporation,
which uses a pressurized-water reactor
(PWR) and a once-through cooling
system for turbine exhaust condensor
cooling and as the ultimate heat sink.
[Docket No. 50–244]
Identification of the Proposed Action
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, LLC;
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant; Draft
Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact
Related To The Proposed License
Amendment to Increase the Maximum
Reactor Power Level
By letter dated July 7, 2005
(Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System Accession No.
ML051950123), Ginna LLC proposed an
amendment to the operating license for
Ginna to increase the maximum steady
state power level by approximately 16.8
percent, from 1520 MWt to 1775 MWt.
The change is considered an EPU
because it would raise the reactor core
power level by more than 7 percent
above the currently licensed maximum
power level. This proposed action
would allow the heat output of the
reactor to increase, which would
increase the flow of steam to the main
turbine-generator. This would result in
the increase in production of electricity
and the amount of waste heat delivered
to the condenser, resulting in an
increase in the temperature of the water
being discharged into Lake Ontario.
Michael P. Crosby,
Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–3532 Filed 4–10–06; 8:54 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Opportunity for Public
Comment.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has prepared a Draft
Environmental Assessment as part of its
evaluation of a request by R.E. Ginna
Nuclear Power Plant, LLC (Ginna LLC)
for a license amendment to increase the
maximum steady state power level at
the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant
(Ginna) from 1520 megawatts thermal
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:56 Apr 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18779
The Need for the Proposed Action
Ginna LLC estimates the proposed
action would result in approximately 85
additional megawatts-electric (MWe)
being generated. This additional
electricity generation could power
approximately 95,000 homes and would
contribute to meeting the goals and
recommendations of the New York State
Energy Plan. The EPU could be
implemented for approximately onefifth of the cost to construct two small
(50-MWe) natural gas combustion
turbine units, as recommended by the
New York State Energy Planning Board,
and would not cause the environmental
impacts that would occur from
construction of new power generation
facilities to meet the region’s electricity
needs.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
At the time of issuance of the
operating license for Ginna, the NRC
staff noted that any activity authorized
by the license would be encompassed
by the overall action evaluated in the
Final Environmental Statement (FES)
for the operation of Ginna, which was
issued March 1973. In addition, in
February 2004, the NRC published its
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (SEIS), NUREG–1437
Supplement 14, ‘‘Generic
Environmental Impact Statement for
License Renewal of Nuclear Plants,
Supplement 14, Regarding R.E. Ginna
Nuclear Power Plant—Final Report,’’
which evaluated the environmental
impacts of operating Ginna for an
additional 20 years. In the SEIS, the
NRC determined that the adverse
environmental impacts of license
renewal would not be so great that
preserving the option of license renewal
for energy-planning decision makers
would be unreasonable. This
environmental assessment summarizes
the radiological and non-radiological
impacts in the environment that may
result from the EPU.
Non-Radiological Impacts
Land Use Impacts
The potential impacts associated with
land use for the proposed action include
impacts from construction and plant
modifications. The impacts from
construction due to the proposed EPU
are minimal. No expansion of roads,
parking lots, equipment storage areas, or
transmission facilities and no new
building construction is anticipated to
support the proposed EPU. Volumes of
industrial chemicals, fuels, or lubricants
are not expected to increase
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18778-18779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3487]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES
Institute of Museum and Library Services; Proposed Collection,
Comment Request, User Satisfaction With Access to Government
Information and Services at Public Libraries and Public Access
Computing Centers
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Institute of Museum and Library Services as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a
pre-clearance consultation program to provide the general public and
Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3508(2)(a)]. This program helps to
ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed.
Currently the Institute of Museum and Library Services is soliciting
comments concerning a survey to assess user satisfaction with access to
government information and services at public libraries and public
access computing centers.
A copy of the proposed information collection request can be
obtained by contacting the individual listed below in the addressee
section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before June 12, 2006.
IMLS is particularly interested in comments that help the agency
to:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collocation of information including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used:
Enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to: Rebecca Danvers, PhD, Director of Research
and Technology, Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1800 M St.,
NW., 9th floor, Washington, DC 20036, telephone: 202-653-4680, fax:
202-653-4625 or by e-mail at rdanvers@imls.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Institute of Museum and Library Servicdes is an independent
Federal grant-making agency authorized by the Museum and Library
Services Act, 20 U.S.C. 9101, et seq. The IMLS provides a variety of
grant programs to assist the nation's museums and libraries in
improving their operations and enhancing their services to the public.
Museums and libraries of all sizes and types may receive support from
IMLS programs. This solicitation is to collect information via surveys
on how satisfied the national public is in finding government
information and what type of programs public libraries and community
technology centers provide to help users.
II. Current Action
The core duties of the Institute of Museum and Library Services, as
stated in its strategic plan, are to promote excellence in library
services and to promote access to museum and library services for a
diverse public. The E-Government Act of 2002 called for the promotion
of access to the Internet to provide increased opportunities for
citizen participation in government, and an interagency committee
issued a report looking at disparities in Internet access across a
demographic spectrum. Few studies, however, have looked at the kinds of
assistance (training, tutorials, classes, reference services) that
users are receiving when looking for federal, state, and local
government information and services, whether via the Internet or
through traditional means (walk-in, mail, telephone), and whether users
are satisfied with the assistance that they are receiving from public
libraries and public access computing centers. In order to address this
critical information gap and to enhance the quality of library services
nationwide, the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) has
undertaken a study to better understand how users are accessing
federal, state, and local government information and services and what
kinds of assistance public libraries and other public access computing
centers are offering to users seeking government information and
services. IMLS is conducting a research study on how the part of the
population with limited access to Internet resources (individuals who
do not have broadband access from home, work, or school; who choose to
access government services and information from locations other than
home, work, or school; or who do so through traditional means of
access) accesses federal, state and local government services and
information, and whether such users are satisfied with the information
and services they are able to access. Additionally, the study examines
the ways that public libraries and public access computing centers
provide assistance (e.g., reference services, tutorials, classes,
training) to users seeking federal, state, and local government
information and services.
Agency: Institute of Museum and Library Services.
Title: National Study of Users and Potential Users of Online
Information.
OMB Number: n/a.
Agency Number: 3137.
Frequency: On time.
Affected Public: User Satisfaction with Access to Government
Information and Services at Public Libraries and Public Access
Computing Centers.
Number of Respondents: 5,700.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 or 20 minutes.
Total Burden Hours: 1630.
Total Annualized Capital/Startup Costs: 0.
Total Annual Costs: $40,792.
[[Page 18779]]
Contact: Rebecca Danvers, PhD, Director of Research and Technology,
Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1800 M St., NW., 9th floor,
Washington, DC 20036, telephone: 202-653-4680, fax: 202-653-4625 or by
e-mail at rdanvers@imls.gov.
Dated: April 7, 2006.
Rebecca W. Danvers,
Director, Office of Research and Technology.
[FR Doc. 06-3487 Filed 4-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7036-01-M