Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes, 18242-18244 [06-3433]
Download as PDF
18242
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Parts Installation
(h) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a fuel access panel, P/N
85714230–001, on any airplane unless the
panel has been inspected, and all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions
have been accomplished, in accordance with
paragraph (f) of this AD.
No Report Required
(i) Although the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
84–57–13, dated August 17, 2005, specify to
report certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Related Information
(k) Canadian airworthiness directive CF–
2005–37, dated October 11, 2005, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
31, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 06–3439 Filed 4–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–24410; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–261–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 747 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 747 airplanes. This
proposed AD would require repetitive
inspections for cracking of the web of
the station (STA) 2360 aft pressure
bulkhead around the fastener heads in
the critical fastener rows in the web lap
joints, from the Y-chord to the inner
ring; and repair if necessary. This
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:25 Apr 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
proposed AD also would require a
modification, which would terminate
the repetitive inspections. This
proposed AD results from analysis by
the manufacturer that the radial lap
splices of the STA 2360 aft pressure
bulkhead are subject to widespread
fatigue damage. We are proposing this
AD to detect and correct cracking of the
bulkhead web at multiple sites along the
radial lap splice, which could join
together to form cracks of critical length,
and result in rapid decompression and
loss of control of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://
dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions
for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207, for the service
information identified in this proposed
AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicholas Kusz, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 917–6432;
fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2006–24410; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–261–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
Discussion
We have received a report indicating
that the radial lap splices of the station
(STA) 2360 aft pressure bulkhead are
subject to widespread fatigue damage
(WFD), on all Boeing Model 747
airplanes that have exceeded the
original Design Service Object of 20,000
total flight cycles. This WFD, if not
detected and corrected, could result in
cracking of the bulkhead web at
multiple sites along the radial lap
splice, which could join together to
form cracks of critical length, and result
in rapid decompression and loss of
control of the airplane.
Other Relevant Rulemaking
On July 26, 2000, we issued AD 2000–
15–08, amendment 39–11840 (65 FR
74255, August 2, 2000), for certain
Boeing Model 747 airplanes. That AD
requires repetitive inspections for
damage or cracking of the aft pressure
bulkhead, and cracking of the web-to-Yring lap joint area and the upper
segment of the bulkhead web; certain
follow-on actions if necessary; and
repetitive inspections to detect cracking
of the upper and lower segments of the
aft bulkhead web, including radial lap
joints. That AD was prompted by a
report of a crack in the upper portion of
the web of the pressure bulkhead at STA
2360 on a Boeing Model 747 airplane.
We issued that AD to detect and correct
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
fatigue cracking of the bulkhead web,
which could result in rapid
depressurization of the airplane, and
consequent reduced controllability of
the airplane. Among other actions, AD
2000–15–08 requires inspecting the
radial lap joints, which are the subject
of this proposed AD; however, this
proposed AD would require repetitive
inspections at reduced intervals.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–53A2561, dated
September 22, 2005. The service
bulletin describes procedures for doing
repetitive high-frequency eddy current
inspections for cracking of the web of
the STA 2360 aft pressure bulkhead
around the fastener heads in the critical
fastener rows in the web lap joints, from
the Y-chord to the inner ring. The
service bulletin specifies that it is not
necessary to inspect areas where
production doublers cover the lap joint.
If any cracking is found, the service
bulletin specifies repairing in
accordance with the Structural Repair
Manual (SRM), or asking Boeing for
repair data. The service bulletin also
specifies that if the length of the crack
is more than certain specified limits
defined in the SRM to contact Boeing
for repair instructions. The service
bulletin also recommends that a
modification be installed when the
airplane has flown 35,000 total flight
cycles, but does not give procedures for
doing that modification. The
modification is intended to terminate
the repetitive inspections.
Accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information is intended to
adequately address the unsafe
condition.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other airplanes of this same
type design. For this reason, we are
proposing this AD, which would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously, except as discussed under
‘‘Differences Between the Proposed AD
and the Service Bulletin.’’
Differences Between the Proposed AD
and the Service Bulletin
Although the service bulletin does not
specify a compliance grace period for
modifying the airplanes that have
accumulated more than 35,000 total
flight cycles, this proposed AD would
include an 18-month grace period for
modifying those airplanes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:25 Apr 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
Although the service bulletin
specifies to contact Boeing for repair
data if a damaged area is more than
certain specified limits, or if the damage
includes corrosion; and although the
service bulletin does not specify
procedures for installing the
modification when the airplane has
accumulated 35,000 total flight cycles;
this proposed AD would require
operators to do the repairs and
modification using a method approved
by the FAA.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 949 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
This proposed AD would affect about
153 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
proposed inspections would take about
11 work hours per airplane, at an
average labor rate of $680 per work
hour. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the proposed AD for
U.S. operators is $134,640, or $880 per
airplane, per inspection cycle.
Because the manufacturer has not yet
developed a modification that matches
the actions specified by this proposed
AD, we cannot provide specific
information regarding the required
number of work hours or the cost of
parts to do the proposed modification.
In addition, modification costs will
likely vary depending on the operator
and the airplane configuration.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18243
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2006–24410;
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–261–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by May 26, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model
747–100, 747–100B, 747–100B SUD, 747–
200B, 747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747–
400, 747–400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and 747SP
series airplanes, certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from analysis by the
manufacturer that the radial lap splices of the
station (STA) 2360 aft pressure bulkhead are
subject to widespread fatigue damage. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking
of the bulkhead web at multiple sites along
the radial lap splice, which could join
together to form cracks of critical length, and
result in rapid decompression and loss of
control of the airplane.
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
18244
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Repetitive Inspections
(f) Before the airplane accumulates 28,000
total flight cycles, or within 18 months after
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later: Do a high-frequency eddy
current inspection for cracking of the web of
the STA 2360 aft pressure bulkhead around
the fastener heads in the critical fastener
rows in the web lap joints, from the Y-chord
to the inner ring; in accordance with Part 2,
‘‘Access and Inspection,’’ of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–53A2561, dated
September 22, 2005. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 2,000
flight cycles until the modification in
paragraph (h) of this AD is done.
Repair
(g) If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (f) of this
AD: Before further flight, do the applicable
action in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD.
(1) If the cracking is within certain limits
specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747–53A2561, dated September 22, 2005,
(referencing the structural repair manual) do
the repair in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the alert
service bulletin.
(2) If the cracking is more than certain
limits specified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–53A2561, dated September 22,
2005, or if the alert service bulletin specifies
to ask Boeing for repair data: Repair the
cracking using a method approved by the
Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA. For a repair method to be
approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as
required by this paragraph, the Manager’s
approval letter must specifically refer to this
AD.
Modification
(h) Before the airplane accumulates 35,000
total flight cycles or within 18 months after
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later: Modify the aft pressure
bulkhead using a method approved by the
Manager, Seattle ACO. For a repair method
to be approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO,
as required by this paragraph, the Manager’s
approval letter must specifically refer to this
AD. Doing this modification terminates the
repetitive inspection requirements of
paragraph (f) of this AD.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:25 Apr 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
31, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 06–3433 Filed 4–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–24411; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–033–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier
Model DHC–8–102, –103, –106, –201,
–202, –301, –311, –314, and –315
Airplanes; Equipped with Certain
Cockpit Door Installations
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier Model DHC–8–102,
–103, –106, –201, –202, –301, –311,
–314, and –315 airplanes. This proposed
AD would require modifying the hinge
attachment for the cockpit door from a
single-point attachment to a two-point
attachment. This proposed AD results
from a report that, during structural
testing of the cockpit door, the lower
hinge block rotated and caused the
mating hinge pin to disengage, and
caused excessive door deflection. We
are proposing this AD to prevent failure
of a door attachment, which could result
in uncontrolled release of the cockpit
door under certain fuselage
decompression conditions, and possible
damage to the airplane structure.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://
dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions
for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier
Regional Aircraft Division, 123 Garratt
Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K
1Y5, Canada, for service information
identified in this proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Duckett, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE–
171, New York Aircraft Certification
Office, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590;
telephone (516) 228–7325; fax (516)
794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2006–24411; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–033–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18242-18244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3433]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-24410; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-261-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Boeing Model 747 airplanes. This proposed AD would require
repetitive inspections for cracking of the web of the station (STA)
2360 aft pressure bulkhead around the fastener heads in the critical
fastener rows in the web lap joints, from the Y-chord to the inner
ring; and repair if necessary. This proposed AD also would require a
modification, which would terminate the repetitive inspections. This
proposed AD results from analysis by the manufacturer that the radial
lap splices of the STA 2360 aft pressure bulkhead are subject to
widespread fatigue damage. We are proposing this AD to detect and
correct cracking of the bulkhead web at multiple sites along the radial
lap splice, which could join together to form cracks of critical
length, and result in rapid decompression and loss of control of the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building, room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for the service information identified in this
proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Kusz, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
917-6432; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``FAA-2006-
24410; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-261-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after the Docket Management System
receives them.
Discussion
We have received a report indicating that the radial lap splices of
the station (STA) 2360 aft pressure bulkhead are subject to widespread
fatigue damage (WFD), on all Boeing Model 747 airplanes that have
exceeded the original Design Service Object of 20,000 total flight
cycles. This WFD, if not detected and corrected, could result in
cracking of the bulkhead web at multiple sites along the radial lap
splice, which could join together to form cracks of critical length,
and result in rapid decompression and loss of control of the airplane.
Other Relevant Rulemaking
On July 26, 2000, we issued AD 2000-15-08, amendment 39-11840 (65
FR 74255, August 2, 2000), for certain Boeing Model 747 airplanes. That
AD requires repetitive inspections for damage or cracking of the aft
pressure bulkhead, and cracking of the web-to-Y-ring lap joint area and
the upper segment of the bulkhead web; certain follow-on actions if
necessary; and repetitive inspections to detect cracking of the upper
and lower segments of the aft bulkhead web, including radial lap
joints. That AD was prompted by a report of a crack in the upper
portion of the web of the pressure bulkhead at STA 2360 on a Boeing
Model 747 airplane. We issued that AD to detect and correct
[[Page 18243]]
fatigue cracking of the bulkhead web, which could result in rapid
depressurization of the airplane, and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane. Among other actions, AD 2000-15-08
requires inspecting the radial lap joints, which are the subject of
this proposed AD; however, this proposed AD would require repetitive
inspections at reduced intervals.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2561, dated
September 22, 2005. The service bulletin describes procedures for doing
repetitive high-frequency eddy current inspections for cracking of the
web of the STA 2360 aft pressure bulkhead around the fastener heads in
the critical fastener rows in the web lap joints, from the Y-chord to
the inner ring. The service bulletin specifies that it is not necessary
to inspect areas where production doublers cover the lap joint. If any
cracking is found, the service bulletin specifies repairing in
accordance with the Structural Repair Manual (SRM), or asking Boeing
for repair data. The service bulletin also specifies that if the length
of the crack is more than certain specified limits defined in the SRM
to contact Boeing for repair instructions. The service bulletin also
recommends that a modification be installed when the airplane has flown
35,000 total flight cycles, but does not give procedures for doing that
modification. The modification is intended to terminate the repetitive
inspections. Accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information is intended to adequately address the unsafe condition.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of this same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information described previously, except as discussed under
``Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service Bulletin.''
Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service Bulletin
Although the service bulletin does not specify a compliance grace
period for modifying the airplanes that have accumulated more than
35,000 total flight cycles, this proposed AD would include an 18-month
grace period for modifying those airplanes.
Although the service bulletin specifies to contact Boeing for
repair data if a damaged area is more than certain specified limits, or
if the damage includes corrosion; and although the service bulletin
does not specify procedures for installing the modification when the
airplane has accumulated 35,000 total flight cycles; this proposed AD
would require operators to do the repairs and modification using a
method approved by the FAA.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 949 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This proposed AD would affect about 153 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The proposed inspections would take about 11 work hours
per airplane, at an average labor rate of $680 per work hour. Based on
these figures, the estimated cost of the proposed AD for U.S. operators
is $134,640, or $880 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
Because the manufacturer has not yet developed a modification that
matches the actions specified by this proposed AD, we cannot provide
specific information regarding the required number of work hours or the
cost of parts to do the proposed modification. In addition,
modification costs will likely vary depending on the operator and the
airplane configuration.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2006-24410; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-
261-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by May 26,
2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-
100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D,
747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes, certificated in any
category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from analysis by the manufacturer that the
radial lap splices of the station (STA) 2360 aft pressure bulkhead
are subject to widespread fatigue damage. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct cracking of the bulkhead web at multiple sites
along the radial lap splice, which could join together to form
cracks of critical length, and result in rapid decompression and
loss of control of the airplane.
[[Page 18244]]
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Repetitive Inspections
(f) Before the airplane accumulates 28,000 total flight cycles,
or within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later: Do a high-frequency eddy current inspection for
cracking of the web of the STA 2360 aft pressure bulkhead around the
fastener heads in the critical fastener rows in the web lap joints,
from the Y-chord to the inner ring; in accordance with Part 2,
``Access and Inspection,'' of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2561, dated September 22, 2005.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 2,000
flight cycles until the modification in paragraph (h) of this AD is
done.
Repair
(g) If any cracking is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (f) of this AD: Before further flight, do the applicable
action in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD.
(1) If the cracking is within certain limits specified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2561, dated September 22, 2005,
(referencing the structural repair manual) do the repair in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the alert service
bulletin.
(2) If the cracking is more than certain limits specified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2561, dated September 22, 2005,
or if the alert service bulletin specifies to ask Boeing for repair
data: Repair the cracking using a method approved by the Manager,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA. For a repair
method to be approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as required by
this paragraph, the Manager's approval letter must specifically
refer to this AD.
Modification
(h) Before the airplane accumulates 35,000 total flight cycles
or within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later: Modify the aft pressure bulkhead using a method
approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. For a repair method to be
approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as required by this paragraph,
the Manager's approval letter must specifically refer to this AD.
Doing this modification terminates the repetitive inspection
requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 31, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 06-3433 Filed 4-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P