Northern Gulf of Mexico Cooperative Institute, 18082-18085 [E6-5184]
Download as PDF
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
18082
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Notices
purposes for which the instruments
shown below are intended to be used,
are being manufactured in the United
States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR
301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and
be filed within 20 days with the
Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Washington,
D.C. 20230. Applications may be
examined between 8:30 A.M. and 5 p.m.
in Suite 4100W, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Franklin Court Building,
1099 14th Street, NW, Washington, DC.
Docket Number: 06-007. Applicant:
University of Connecticut, 91 N.
Eagleville Road, BSP Bldg., Unit 3242,
Storrs, CT 06269. Instrument: Electron
Microscope, Model Technai G2 Spirit
BioTWIN. Manufacturer: FEI Company,
The Netherlands. Intended Use: The
instrument is intended to be used in a
multi-user facility providing training
and service to faculty, staff and
students. A wide variety of cells and
tissues will be examined. The
ultrastructural arrangement of cells,
organelles and macromolecular
assemblies and the fine structure of
domains within polymers will be
investigated. Research projects ranging
from evolutionary biology to materials
science will use the instrument.
Application accepted by Commissioner
of Customs: March 20, 2006.
Docket Number: 06-008. Applicant:
California Institute of Technology, 1200
E. California Boulevard, Mail Code 1036, Pasadena, CA 91125. Instrument:
Neutron Guide. Manufacturer:
SwissNeutronics, Switzerland. Intended
Use: The instrument is a compatible key
accessory for the high-resolution, directgeometry, time-of-flight chopper
spectrometer (ARCS) at the Spallation
Neutron Source at Oak Ridge N.L. It will
be used to investigate the energy spectra
obtained when neutrons incident on a
sample are scattered by the motions of
atoms or of electron spins in the sample.
Studies will include the
thermodynamics of atom vibrations or
spin motions, or of their characteristic
energies and momenta, cooperative
motions of electrons in solids relevant
to electrical transport, magnetic
properties and superconductivity. The
neutron guide is especially useful for
studies that require low or mediumenergy neutron beams that are incident
on the sample. Application accepted by
the Commissioner of Customs: February
27, 2006.
Docket Number: 06-009. Applicant: The
New York Structural Biology
Laboratory, 89 Convent Avenue at 133rd
St, New York, NY 10027. Instrument:
Electron Microscope, Model JEM 2100F.
Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Apr 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
Intended Use: The instrument is
intended to be used by ten educational
and research institutions in New York to
investigate, among other things,
biological assemblies ranging from
isolated protein molecules, complexes
of protein molecules potentially bound
to nucleic acids or membranes,
crystalline arrays composed of these
protein complexes, cells, viruses, or
intact tissues to pursue a wide variety
of biological problems. In addition to
standard methods of electron
microscopy, work will be done using
the procedure of electron tomography
which is like a CAT scan at molecular
proportions, involving the imaging of a
given cellular assembly which is
systematically tilted to different angles.
It will alsobe used in student courses.
Application accepted by Commissioner
of Customs: March 6, 2006.
Docket Number: 06-010. Applicant:
Emory University Hospital, 1364 Clifton
Road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30322.
Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model
Mogagni 268. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, The Netherlands. Intended
Use: The instrument is intended to be
used for examination of normal,
abnormal and pathological changes in
human cells and tissue samples.
Experiments will be conducted based on
ultrastructural examination of human
kidney biopsies for documentation of
pathologic change, if any, for diagnostic
evaluation. Ultrathin sections of epoxy
embedded specimens under high
magnification will be preserved for
pathological review. Application
accepted by Commissioner of Customs:
March 1, 2000.
Docket Number: 06-011. Applicant:
President and Fellows of Harvard
College, 9 Oxford Street, Cambridge,
MA 02138. Instrument: Electron
Microscope, Model JEM-2100.
Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.
Intended Use: The instrument is
intended to be used to study and
characterize nanoscale structures and
chemical compositions of novel
materials such as semi-conducting
materials, nano metallic catalysts and
polymers, etc. Some examples include
chemical composition by energydispersive x-ray spectroscopy,
identification of phases and crystal
structures by electron diffraction,
interfacial arrangements of atomic
structures between polymer materials by
stain-inducted contrast imaging and
lattice-fringe imaging of metallic thin
films and alloys. Application accepted
by Commissioner of Customs: March 20,
2006.
Docket Number: 06-013. Applicant:
Ames Laboratory - U.S. Department of
Energy REF: A5–2764, 211, TASF, Iowa
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
State University, Ames, Iowa 500113020. Instrument: Electron Microscope,
Model Technai G2 F20 X-TWIN.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, the
Netherlands. Intended Use: The
instrument is intended to be used to
provide both the imaging and
spectrographic analysis necessary to
evaluate materials ranging from rapidly
solidified metals, nanoscale magnetic
alloys, directionally solidified metal
alloys, mesoporous catalysis and novel
polymer compounds. With reduced
length scale of materials, interaction
with their environment changes. The
instrument will allow probing the
chemistry and atomic arrangements
(nanostructure) down to the level of the
atoms and to assess the success of
processing procedures. Application
accepted by Commissioner of Customs:
March 23, 2006.
Docket Number: 06-014. Applicant:
Howard Hughes Medical Institute,
Harvard Medical School, 77 Ave. Louis
Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115. Instrument:
Confocal Microscope. Manufacturer:
Evotec, Germany. Intended Use: The
instrument is intended to be used to
assign phenotopic signatures
(phenoprints) to every Drosophilia gene
using genome-wide RNAi screens.
These can be used to cluster genes that
are functionally related and important
in functional genomics. The instrument
combines the high resolution of
confocal laser scanning microscopy
with ultra high throughput (≤200,00
images per day) and an integrated fast
autofocus system provides maximal
resolution and lowest background.
Application accepted by Commissioner
of Customs: March 24, 2006.
Gerald A. Zerdy,
Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs
Staff.
[FR Doc. E6–5195 Filed 4–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[Docket No. 060404095–6095–01]
Northern Gulf of Mexico Cooperative
Institute
Office of Oceanic and
Atmospheric Research, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of funds.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Office of Oceanic and
Atmospheric Research (OAR) invites
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Notices
applications to establish a Northern Gulf
of Mexico (NGOM) Cooperative Institute
(CI). The creation of this CI is the
cornerstone of NOAA’s commitment to
the Gulf of Mexico Alliance, and
NOAA’s response the U.S. Ocean Action
Plan (Executive Office of the President,
December, 2004). This institute will
facilitate a long-term collaborative
environment between NOAA and the
recipients within which broad-based
research, development, education and
outreach capabilities focusing on the
priorities in the northern Gulf of Mexico
(NGOM) region can be developed and
sustained. The CI will be regional in
scope and should consist of a group of
research institutions in the NGOM
region (which is defined by the states of
Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana,
Florida, and Texas). Most of the
workforce is expected to be located in
Stennis Space Center, MS.
DATES: Proposals must be received by
the OAR no later than 5 p.m., E.T., May
25, 2006. Proposals submitted after that
date will not be considered.
ADDRESSES: Applicants are strongly
encouraged to apply online through the
Grants.gov Web site (https://
www.grants.gov) but paper submissions
are acceptable. If a hard copy
application is submitted, the original
and two unbound copies of the proposal
should be included. Applicants are not
required to submit more than three hard
copies of the proposal if the
recommended electronic grants
submission via grants.gov is not made.
Paper submissions should be sent to:
NOAA, OAR, 1315 East West Highway,
Room 11554, Silver Spring, Md. 20910
Attn: Dr. John Cortinas. No e-mail or
facsimile proposal submissions will be
accepted. The complete Federal funding
opportunity announcement associated
with this notice can be found at the
Grants.gov Web site, https://
www.grants.gov, and the NOAA Web
site at https://www.nrc.noaa.gov/ci.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
a copy of the federal funding
opportunity announcement and/or
application kit, access it at Grants.gov,
via NOAA’s Web site, or by contacting
Dr. John Cortinas, 1315 East West
Highway, Room 11554, Silver Spring,
Md. 20910 telephone 301–713–9397 x
206. Facsimile: (301) 713–0158; e-mail:
John.Cortinas@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: A CI is a NOAAsupported, non-federal organization that
has established an outstanding research
program in one or more areas that are
relevant to the NOAA mission. CIs are
established at research institutions that
also have a strong education program
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Apr 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
with established graduate degree
programs in NOAA-related sciences.
The CI provides significant coordination
of resources among all non-government
partners and promotes the involvement
of students and postdoctoral scientists
in NOAA-funded research. The CI
provides mutual benefits with value
provided by all parties.
NOAA has identified the need for a
new CI to focus upon a region of
particular significance to the federal
government and NOAA, the NGOM. The
creation of this CI is the cornerstone of
NOAA’s commitment to the Gulf of
Mexico Alliance, and NOAA’s response
to the U.S. Ocean Action Plan
(Executive Office of the President,
December, 2004), which recommends a
‘‘Regional Partnership in the Gulf of
Mexico.’’ The objective of the Gulf of
Mexico Alliance is to establish an
integrated management approach for the
Gulf of Mexico led by surrounding
states (https://www.
gulfofmexicoalliance.org). There is a
particular emphasis on public health,
specifically on water quality for
shellfish beds and beaches in the Gulf
of Mexico and the use of a regional
ocean observing system to provide a
real-time alert system for beach and
shellfish bed closings. The NGOM CI is
expected to contribute to the priority
areas initially identified by the Alliance:
• Improving and protecting water
quality.
• Restoring and conserving coastal
wetlands and estuarine ecosystems.
• Reducing pollution and nutrient
loading.
• Identifying and characterizing Gulf
habitats to support coastal management.
• Expanding environmental
education to improve stewardship.
Gulf States have also agreed upon
cooperative efforts to collect
information that can be used to better
understand, monitor, and manage the
Gulf of Mexico and to participate in the
national Integrated Ocean Observing
System through the Gulf of Mexico
Coastal Ocean Observing System
(GCOOS) (https://ocean.tamu.edu/
GCOOS/RA/vision.htm). Thus, the
NGOM CI would also contribute to the
GCOOS vision to ‘‘establish a sustained
observing system for the Gulf of Mexico
to provide observations and products
needed by users in this region’’ to
enable:
• Detecting and predicting climate
variability and consequences.
• Preserving and restoring healthy
marine ecosystems.
• Ensuring human health.
• Managing resources.
• Facilitating safe and efficient
marine transportation.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18083
• Predicting and mitigating against
coastal hazards.
The above priorities map directly to
the NOAA Strategic Plan and its
primary scientific goals. They are also
consistent with NOAA 5-yr Research
Plan and 20-yr Research Vision.
Electronic Access: Applicants can
access, download, and submit electronic
grant applications, including the full
funding opportunity announcement, for
NOAA programs at the Grants.gov Web
site: https://www.grants.gov. The closing
date will be the same as for the paper
submissions noted in this
announcement. For applicants filing
through Grants.gov, NOAA strongly
recommends that you do not wait until
the application deadline date to begin
the application process through
Grants.gov. Registration may take up to
10 business days. More details on how
to apply are provided in the NOAA June
30, 2005 Federal Register Notice on
‘‘Availability of Grant Funds for Fiscal
Year 2006’’, which can be found at:
https://www.Grants.gov or https://www.
ago.noaa.gov/grants/funding.shtml.
Proposals submitted to the NOAA
Cooperative Institute Program must
include elements requested in the full
Federal Funding Opportunity
announcement on the grants.gov portal.
Proposals, electronic or paper, should
be no more than 65 pages (numbered) in
length, including budget, investigators
vitae, and all appendices. Federally
mandated forms are not included within
the page count. Facsimile transmissions
and electronic mail submission of full
proposals will not be accepted.
Funding Availability: The award
period will be five years and may be
renewed for an additional five years
based on the outcome of a CI peer
review in the fourth year. All funding is
contingent upon availability of Federal
appropriations. NOAA expects that
approximately $6.3 M will be available
for the CI in the first year of the award.
Of this amount, $650,000 ($130K per
year for 5 years) will be applied to cover
Task I base funding for the entire fiveyear award period. Funding for
subsequent years is expected to be
constant throughout the period,
depending on the quality of the
research, the satisfactory progress in
achieving the stated goals described in
the proposal, continued relevance to
program objectives, and the availability
of funding.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 313, 15 U.S.C. 1540;
15 U.S.C. 2901 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 753a, 33
U.S.C. 883d, 33 U.S.C. 1442, 49 U.S.C. 44720
(b), 118 Stat. 71 (January 23, 2004).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance:
11.432, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
18084
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Notices
Research (OAR) Joint and Cooperative
Institutes.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Eligibility: Eligibility is limited to
non-Federal public and private nonprofit universities, colleges and research
institutions in the states of Mississippi,
Alabama, Louisiana, Florida, and Texas
that offer accredited graduate level
degree-granting programs in NOAArelated sciences, as described in the CI
Interim Handbook, authorized by NOAA
Administrative Order 216–107. Because
of NOAA’s desire to establish a CI that
addresses regional issues in the NGOM,
NOAA is limiting eligibility to specific
states that border the NGOM.
Cost Sharing Requirements: To stress
the collaborative nature and investment
of a CI by both NOAA and the research
institution, cost sharing is required.
There is no minimum cost sharing
requirement, however, the amount of
cost sharing will be considered when
determining the level of CI commitment
under NOAA’s standard evaluation
criteria of project costs. Acceptable costsharing proposals include, but are not
limited to, offering a reduced indirect
cost rate against activities in one or
more Tasks, waiver of indirect costs
assessed against base funds and/or Task
I activities, waiver or reduction of any
costs associated with the use of facilities
at the CI, and full or partial salary
funding for the CI director,
administrative staff, graduate students,
visiting scientists, or postdoctoral
scientists.
Intergovernmental Review:
Applications under this program are not
subject to Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.’’
Evaluation Criteria and Review and
Selection Procedures: NOAA’s standard
evaluation criteria and the review and
selection procedures contained in
NOAA’s June 30, 2005, omnibus notice
are applicable to this solicitation and
are as follows:
A. Evaluation Criteria for Projects
Proposals will be evaluated using the
standard NOAA evaluation criteria.
Various questions under each criterion
are included to ensure that the applicant
includes information that NOAA will
consider important during the
evaluation, in addition to any other
information provided by the applicant.
1. Importance and/or relevance and
applicability of proposed project to the
program goals (25 percent): This
ascertains whether there is intrinsic
value in the proposed work and/or
relevance to NOAA, Federal, regional,
State, or local activities.
• Does the proposal includes research
goals and projects that address the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Apr 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
critical issues identified in NOAA’s 5year Research Plan, NOAA’s Strategic
Plan, and the priorities described in the
supplementary information above?
• Is there a demonstrated
commitment (in terms of resources and
facilities) to enhance existing NOAA
and CI resources to foster a long-term
collaborative research environment/
culture?
• Is there a strong education program
with established graduate degree
programs in NOAA-related sciences that
also encourage student participation in
NOAA-related research studies?
• Will most of the staff at the CI be
located near a NOAA facility in order to
enhance collaborations with NOAA?
2. Technical/scientific merit (30
percent): This assesses whether the
approach is technically sound and/or
innovative, if the methods are
appropriate, and whether there are clear
project goals and objectives.
• Does the project description include
a summary of clearly stated goals to be
achieved during the five-year period
that reflect NOAA’s strategic plan and
goals?
• Does the CI involve partnerships
with other universities or research
institutions, including Minority Serving
Institutions and universities with strong
departments that can contribute to the
proposed activities of the CI?
3. Overall qualifications of applicants
(30 percent): This ascertains whether
the applicant possesses the necessary
education, experience, training,
facilities, and administrative resources
to accomplish the project.
• If the institution(s) and/or principal
investigators have received current or
recent NOAA funding, is there a
demonstrated record of outstanding
performance working with NOAA
scientists on research projects?
• Is there internationally recognized
expertise within the appropriate
disciplines needed to conduct the
collaborative/interdisciplinary research
described in the proposal?
• Is there a well-developed business
plan that includes fiscal and human
resource management as well as
strategic planning and accountability?
• Are there any unique capabilities in
a mission-critical area of research for
NOAA?
• Has the applicant shown a
substantial investment to the NOAA
partnership, as demonstrated by a cost
sharing contribution?
4. Project costs (5 percent): The
budget is evaluated to determine if it is
realistic and commensurate with the
project needs and time-frame.
5. Outreach and education (10
percent): NOAA assesses whether this
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
project provides a focused and effective
education and outreach strategy
regarding NOAA’s mission to protect
the Nation’s natural resources.
B. Review and Selection Process
An initial administrative review/
screening is conducted to determine
compliance with requirements/
completeness. All proposals will be
evaluated and individually ranked in
accordance with the assigned weights of
the above evaluation criteria by an
independent peer panel review. At least
three experts, who may be Federal or
non-Federal, will be used in this
process. If non-Federal experts
participate in the review process, they
will be submitting individual reviews
and will not be reaching a consensus
opinion. The merit reviewers’ ratings
are used to produce a rank order of the
proposals. The Selection Official selects
proposals after considering the peer
panel reviews and selection factors
listed below. In making the final
selections, the Selecting Official will
award in rank order unless the proposal
is justified to be selected out of rank
order based upon one or more of the
selection factors.
C. Selection Factors
The merit review ratings shall provide
a rank order to the Selecting Official for
final funding recommendations. A
program officer may first make
recommendations to the Selecting
Official applying the selection factors
below. The Selecting Official shall
award in the rank order unless the
proposal is justified to be selected out
of rank order based upon one or more
of the following factors:
1. Availability of funding.
2. Balance/distribution of funds:
a. Geographically.
b. By type of institutions.
c. By type of partners.
d. By research areas.
e. By project types.
3. Whether this project duplicates
other projects funded or considered for
funding by NOAA or other Federal
agencies.
4. Program priorities and policy
factors.
5. Applicant’s prior award
performance.
6. Partnerships and/or participation of
targeted groups.
7. Adequacy of information necessary
for NOAA staff to make a NEPA
determination and draft necessary
documentation before recommendations
for funding are made to the Grants
Officer.
Applicants must comply with all
requirements contained in the full
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Notices
funding opportunity announcements for
each project competition in this
announcement.
Universal Identifier: Applicants
should be aware that, they are required
to provide a Dun and Bradstreet Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
number during the application process.
See the October 30, 2002 Federal
Register, Vol. 67, No. 210, pp. 66177–
66178 for additional information.
Organizations can receive a DUNS
number at no cost by calling the
dedicated toll-free DUNS Number
request line at 1–866–705–5711 or via
the Internet (https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com).
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA): NOAA must analyze the
potential environmental impacts, as
required by the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA), for applicant
projects or proposals which are seeking
NOAA Federal funding opportunities.
Detailed information on NOAA
compliance with NEPA can be found at
NOAA’s NEPA Web site, https://
www.nepa.noaa.gov/, and the Council
on Environmental Quality
implementation regulations, https://ceq.
eh.doe.gov/nepa/regs/ceq/toc_ceq.htm.
Consequently, as part of an
applicant’s package, and under their
description of their program activities,
applicants are required to provide
detailed information on the activities to
be conducted, locations, sites, species
and habitat to be affected, possible
construction activities, and any
environmental concerns that may exist
(e.g., the use and disposal of hazardous
or toxic chemicals, introduction of nonindigenous species, impacts to
endangered and threatened species,
aquaculture projects, and impacts to
coral reef systems). In addition to
providing specific information that will
serve as the basis for any required
impact analyses, applicants may also be
requested to assist NOAA in drafting of
an environmental assessment, if NOAA
determines an assessment is required.
Applicants will also be required to
cooperate with NOAA in identifying
feasible measures to reduce or avoid any
identified adverse environmental
impacts of their proposal. The failure to
do so shall be grounds for not selecting
an application. In some cases if
additional information is required after
an application is selected, funds can be
withheld by the Grants Officer under a
special award condition requiring the
recipient to submit additional
environmental compliance information
sufficient to enable NOAA to make an
assessment on any impacts that a project
may have on the environment.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Apr 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
18085
Pre-Award Notification Requirements
for Grants and Cooperative Agreements
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required and none has been prepared.
The Department of Commerce PreAward Notification Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements
contained in the Federal Register notice
of December 30, 2004 (69 FR 78389) are
applicable to this solicitation.
Limitation of Liability: Funding for
years 2–5 of the Cooperative Institute is
contingent upon the availability of
appropriated funds. In no event will
NOAA or the Department of Commerce
be responsible for application
preparation costs if these programs fail
to receive funding or are cancelled
because of other agency priorities.
Publication of this announcement does
not oblige NOAA to award any specific
project or to obligate any available
funds.
Paperwork Reduction Act: This
notification involves collection of
information requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act. The use of
Standard Forms 424, 424A, 424B, and
SF–LLL and CD–346 has been approved
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) respectively under
control numbers 0348–0043, 0348–0044,
0348–0040, and 0348–0046 and 0605–
0001. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Executive Order 12866: It has been
determined that this notice is not
significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism):
It has been determined that this notice
does not contain policies with
Federalism implications as that term is
defined in Executive Order 13132.
Administrative Procedure Act/
Regulatory Flexibility Act: Prior notice
and an opportunity for public comment
are not required by the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other law for rules
concerning public property, grants,
benefits, and contracts (5 U.S.C.
553(a)(2)).
Because notice and opportunity for
comments are not required pursuant to
U.S.C. 553 or any other law, the
analytical requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.) are inapplicable. Therefore, a
Stephen B. Brandt,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator, OAR,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–5184 Filed 4–7–06; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 032406A]
General Advisory Committee to the
U.S. Section to the Inter-American
Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC);
Meeting Announcement
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS announces a meeting
of the General Advisory Committee to
the U.S. Section to the IATTC on April
27, 2006, via telephone conference call.
The April 27, 2006, teleconference
reschedules the April 11, 2006
teleconference.
The General Advisory
Committee meeting will be held on
April 27, 2006, from 12 noon to 3 p.m.,
Pacific Time.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held
via telephone conference call at (866)
857–1547, participant passcode,
3313634.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
J.Allison Routt at (562) 980–4019 or
(562) 980–4030.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The initial
notification of this meeting was
published in the Federal Register on
March 29, 2006, (71 FR 15698). In the
original notice, it stated that the meeting
date was April 11, 2006. The meeting
has been rescheduled to be held on
April 27, 2006. All other information
previously published remains the same.
In accordance with the Tuna
Conventions Act, as amended, the
Department of State has appointed a
General Advisory Committee to the U.S.
Section to the IATTC. The U.S. Section
consists of the four U.S. Commissioners
to the IATTC and the representative of
the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State
for Oceans and Fisheries. The Advisory
Committee supports the work of the
U.S. Section in a solely advisory
capacity with respect to U.S.
participation in the work of the IATTC,
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18082-18085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-5184]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[Docket No. 060404095-6095-01]
Northern Gulf of Mexico Cooperative Institute
AGENCY: Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of funds.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR) invites
[[Page 18083]]
applications to establish a Northern Gulf of Mexico (NGOM) Cooperative
Institute (CI). The creation of this CI is the cornerstone of NOAA's
commitment to the Gulf of Mexico Alliance, and NOAA's response the U.S.
Ocean Action Plan (Executive Office of the President, December, 2004).
This institute will facilitate a long-term collaborative environment
between NOAA and the recipients within which broad-based research,
development, education and outreach capabilities focusing on the
priorities in the northern Gulf of Mexico (NGOM) region can be
developed and sustained. The CI will be regional in scope and should
consist of a group of research institutions in the NGOM region (which
is defined by the states of Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, Florida,
and Texas). Most of the workforce is expected to be located in Stennis
Space Center, MS.
DATES: Proposals must be received by the OAR no later than 5 p.m.,
E.T., May 25, 2006. Proposals submitted after that date will not be
considered.
ADDRESSES: Applicants are strongly encouraged to apply online through
the Grants.gov Web site (https://www.grants.gov) but paper submissions
are acceptable. If a hard copy application is submitted, the original
and two unbound copies of the proposal should be included. Applicants
are not required to submit more than three hard copies of the proposal
if the recommended electronic grants submission via grants.gov is not
made. Paper submissions should be sent to: NOAA, OAR, 1315 East West
Highway, Room 11554, Silver Spring, Md. 20910 Attn: Dr. John Cortinas.
No e-mail or facsimile proposal submissions will be accepted. The
complete Federal funding opportunity announcement associated with this
notice can be found at the Grants.gov Web site, https://www.grants.gov,
and the NOAA Web site at https://www.nrc.noaa.gov/ci.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For a copy of the federal funding
opportunity announcement and/or application kit, access it at
Grants.gov, via NOAA's Web site, or by contacting Dr. John Cortinas,
1315 East West Highway, Room 11554, Silver Spring, Md. 20910 telephone
301-713-9397 x 206. Facsimile: (301) 713-0158; e-mail:
John.Cortinas@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: A CI is a NOAA-supported, non-federal organization that
has established an outstanding research program in one or more areas
that are relevant to the NOAA mission. CIs are established at research
institutions that also have a strong education program with established
graduate degree programs in NOAA-related sciences. The CI provides
significant coordination of resources among all non-government partners
and promotes the involvement of students and postdoctoral scientists in
NOAA-funded research. The CI provides mutual benefits with value
provided by all parties.
NOAA has identified the need for a new CI to focus upon a region of
particular significance to the federal government and NOAA, the NGOM.
The creation of this CI is the cornerstone of NOAA's commitment to the
Gulf of Mexico Alliance, and NOAA's response to the U.S. Ocean Action
Plan (Executive Office of the President, December, 2004), which
recommends a ``Regional Partnership in the Gulf of Mexico.'' The
objective of the Gulf of Mexico Alliance is to establish an integrated
management approach for the Gulf of Mexico led by surrounding states
(https://www.gulfofmexicoalliance.org). There is a particular emphasis
on public health, specifically on water quality for shellfish beds and
beaches in the Gulf of Mexico and the use of a regional ocean observing
system to provide a real-time alert system for beach and shellfish bed
closings. The NGOM CI is expected to contribute to the priority areas
initially identified by the Alliance:
Improving and protecting water quality.
Restoring and conserving coastal wetlands and estuarine
ecosystems.
Reducing pollution and nutrient loading.
Identifying and characterizing Gulf habitats to support
coastal management.
Expanding environmental education to improve stewardship.
Gulf States have also agreed upon cooperative efforts to collect
information that can be used to better understand, monitor, and manage
the Gulf of Mexico and to participate in the national Integrated Ocean
Observing System through the Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing
System (GCOOS) (https://ocean.tamu.edu/GCOOS/RA/vision.htm). Thus, the
NGOM CI would also contribute to the GCOOS vision to ``establish a
sustained observing system for the Gulf of Mexico to provide
observations and products needed by users in this region'' to enable:
Detecting and predicting climate variability and
consequences.
Preserving and restoring healthy marine ecosystems.
Ensuring human health.
Managing resources.
Facilitating safe and efficient marine transportation.
Predicting and mitigating against coastal hazards.
The above priorities map directly to the NOAA Strategic Plan and
its primary scientific goals. They are also consistent with NOAA 5-yr
Research Plan and 20-yr Research Vision.
Electronic Access: Applicants can access, download, and submit
electronic grant applications, including the full funding opportunity
announcement, for NOAA programs at the Grants.gov Web site: https://
www.grants.gov. The closing date will be the same as for the paper
submissions noted in this announcement. For applicants filing through
Grants.gov, NOAA strongly recommends that you do not wait until the
application deadline date to begin the application process through
Grants.gov. Registration may take up to 10 business days. More details
on how to apply are provided in the NOAA June 30, 2005 Federal Register
Notice on ``Availability of Grant Funds for Fiscal Year 2006'', which
can be found at: https://www.Grants.gov or https://www.ago.noaa.gov/
grants/funding.shtml. Proposals submitted to the NOAA Cooperative
Institute Program must include elements requested in the full Federal
Funding Opportunity announcement on the grants.gov portal. Proposals,
electronic or paper, should be no more than 65 pages (numbered) in
length, including budget, investigators vitae, and all appendices.
Federally mandated forms are not included within the page count.
Facsimile transmissions and electronic mail submission of full
proposals will not be accepted.
Funding Availability: The award period will be five years and may
be renewed for an additional five years based on the outcome of a CI
peer review in the fourth year. All funding is contingent upon
availability of Federal appropriations. NOAA expects that approximately
$6.3 M will be available for the CI in the first year of the award. Of
this amount, $650,000 ($130K per year for 5 years) will be applied to
cover Task I base funding for the entire five-year award period.
Funding for subsequent years is expected to be constant throughout the
period, depending on the quality of the research, the satisfactory
progress in achieving the stated goals described in the proposal,
continued relevance to program objectives, and the availability of
funding.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 313, 15 U.S.C. 1540; 15 U.S.C. 2901 et
seq., 16 U.S.C. 753a, 33 U.S.C. 883d, 33 U.S.C. 1442, 49 U.S.C.
44720 (b), 118 Stat. 71 (January 23, 2004).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance: 11.432, Office of
Oceanic and Atmospheric
[[Page 18084]]
Research (OAR) Joint and Cooperative Institutes.
Eligibility: Eligibility is limited to non-Federal public and
private non-profit universities, colleges and research institutions in
the states of Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, Florida, and Texas that
offer accredited graduate level degree-granting programs in NOAA-
related sciences, as described in the CI Interim Handbook, authorized
by NOAA Administrative Order 216-107. Because of NOAA's desire to
establish a CI that addresses regional issues in the NGOM, NOAA is
limiting eligibility to specific states that border the NGOM.
Cost Sharing Requirements: To stress the collaborative nature and
investment of a CI by both NOAA and the research institution, cost
sharing is required. There is no minimum cost sharing requirement,
however, the amount of cost sharing will be considered when determining
the level of CI commitment under NOAA's standard evaluation criteria of
project costs. Acceptable cost-sharing proposals include, but are not
limited to, offering a reduced indirect cost rate against activities in
one or more Tasks, waiver of indirect costs assessed against base funds
and/or Task I activities, waiver or reduction of any costs associated
with the use of facilities at the CI, and full or partial salary
funding for the CI director, administrative staff, graduate students,
visiting scientists, or postdoctoral scientists.
Intergovernmental Review: Applications under this program are not
subject to Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.''
Evaluation Criteria and Review and Selection Procedures: NOAA's
standard evaluation criteria and the review and selection procedures
contained in NOAA's June 30, 2005, omnibus notice are applicable to
this solicitation and are as follows:
A. Evaluation Criteria for Projects
Proposals will be evaluated using the standard NOAA evaluation
criteria. Various questions under each criterion are included to ensure
that the applicant includes information that NOAA will consider
important during the evaluation, in addition to any other information
provided by the applicant.
1. Importance and/or relevance and applicability of proposed
project to the program goals (25 percent): This ascertains whether
there is intrinsic value in the proposed work and/or relevance to NOAA,
Federal, regional, State, or local activities.
Does the proposal includes research goals and projects
that address the critical issues identified in NOAA's 5-year Research
Plan, NOAA's Strategic Plan, and the priorities described in the
supplementary information above?
Is there a demonstrated commitment (in terms of resources
and facilities) to enhance existing NOAA and CI resources to foster a
long-term collaborative research environment/culture?
Is there a strong education program with established
graduate degree programs in NOAA-related sciences that also encourage
student participation in NOAA-related research studies?
Will most of the staff at the CI be located near a NOAA
facility in order to enhance collaborations with NOAA?
2. Technical/scientific merit (30 percent): This assesses whether
the approach is technically sound and/or innovative, if the methods are
appropriate, and whether there are clear project goals and objectives.
Does the project description include a summary of clearly
stated goals to be achieved during the five-year period that reflect
NOAA's strategic plan and goals?
Does the CI involve partnerships with other universities
or research institutions, including Minority Serving Institutions and
universities with strong departments that can contribute to the
proposed activities of the CI?
3. Overall qualifications of applicants (30 percent): This
ascertains whether the applicant possesses the necessary education,
experience, training, facilities, and administrative resources to
accomplish the project.
If the institution(s) and/or principal investigators have
received current or recent NOAA funding, is there a demonstrated record
of outstanding performance working with NOAA scientists on research
projects?
Is there internationally recognized expertise within the
appropriate disciplines needed to conduct the collaborative/
interdisciplinary research described in the proposal?
Is there a well-developed business plan that includes
fiscal and human resource management as well as strategic planning and
accountability?
Are there any unique capabilities in a mission-critical
area of research for NOAA?
Has the applicant shown a substantial investment to the
NOAA partnership, as demonstrated by a cost sharing contribution?
4. Project costs (5 percent): The budget is evaluated to determine
if it is realistic and commensurate with the project needs and time-
frame.
5. Outreach and education (10 percent): NOAA assesses whether this
project provides a focused and effective education and outreach
strategy regarding NOAA's mission to protect the Nation's natural
resources.
B. Review and Selection Process
An initial administrative review/screening is conducted to
determine compliance with requirements/completeness. All proposals will
be evaluated and individually ranked in accordance with the assigned
weights of the above evaluation criteria by an independent peer panel
review. At least three experts, who may be Federal or non-Federal, will
be used in this process. If non-Federal experts participate in the
review process, they will be submitting individual reviews and will not
be reaching a consensus opinion. The merit reviewers' ratings are used
to produce a rank order of the proposals. The Selection Official
selects proposals after considering the peer panel reviews and
selection factors listed below. In making the final selections, the
Selecting Official will award in rank order unless the proposal is
justified to be selected out of rank order based upon one or more of
the selection factors.
C. Selection Factors
The merit review ratings shall provide a rank order to the
Selecting Official for final funding recommendations. A program officer
may first make recommendations to the Selecting Official applying the
selection factors below. The Selecting Official shall award in the rank
order unless the proposal is justified to be selected out of rank order
based upon one or more of the following factors:
1. Availability of funding.
2. Balance/distribution of funds:
a. Geographically.
b. By type of institutions.
c. By type of partners.
d. By research areas.
e. By project types.
3. Whether this project duplicates other projects funded or
considered for funding by NOAA or other Federal agencies.
4. Program priorities and policy factors.
5. Applicant's prior award performance.
6. Partnerships and/or participation of targeted groups.
7. Adequacy of information necessary for NOAA staff to make a NEPA
determination and draft necessary documentation before recommendations
for funding are made to the Grants Officer.
Applicants must comply with all requirements contained in the full
[[Page 18085]]
funding opportunity announcements for each project competition in this
announcement.
Universal Identifier: Applicants should be aware that, they are
required to provide a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number during the application process. See the October
30, 2002 Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 210, pp. 66177-66178 for
additional information. Organizations can receive a DUNS number at no
cost by calling the dedicated toll-free DUNS Number request line at 1-
866-705-5711 or via the Internet (https://www.dunandbradstreet.com).
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): NOAA must analyze the
potential environmental impacts, as required by the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), for applicant projects or proposals
which are seeking NOAA Federal funding opportunities. Detailed
information on NOAA compliance with NEPA can be found at NOAA's NEPA
Web site, https://www.nepa.noaa.gov/, and the Council on Environmental
Quality implementation regulations, https://ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/regs/
ceq/toc_ceq.htm.
Consequently, as part of an applicant's package, and under their
description of their program activities, applicants are required to
provide detailed information on the activities to be conducted,
locations, sites, species and habitat to be affected, possible
construction activities, and any environmental concerns that may exist
(e.g., the use and disposal of hazardous or toxic chemicals,
introduction of non-indigenous species, impacts to endangered and
threatened species, aquaculture projects, and impacts to coral reef
systems). In addition to providing specific information that will serve
as the basis for any required impact analyses, applicants may also be
requested to assist NOAA in drafting of an environmental assessment, if
NOAA determines an assessment is required. Applicants will also be
required to cooperate with NOAA in identifying feasible measures to
reduce or avoid any identified adverse environmental impacts of their
proposal. The failure to do so shall be grounds for not selecting an
application. In some cases if additional information is required after
an application is selected, funds can be withheld by the Grants Officer
under a special award condition requiring the recipient to submit
additional environmental compliance information sufficient to enable
NOAA to make an assessment on any impacts that a project may have on
the environment.
Pre-Award Notification Requirements for Grants and Cooperative
Agreements
The Department of Commerce Pre-Award Notification Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements contained in the Federal Register
notice of December 30, 2004 (69 FR 78389) are applicable to this
solicitation.
Limitation of Liability: Funding for years 2-5 of the Cooperative
Institute is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds. In
no event will NOAA or the Department of Commerce be responsible for
application preparation costs if these programs fail to receive funding
or are cancelled because of other agency priorities. Publication of
this announcement does not oblige NOAA to award any specific project or
to obligate any available funds.
Paperwork Reduction Act: This notification involves collection of
information requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act. The
use of Standard Forms 424, 424A, 424B, and SF-LLL and CD-346 has been
approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) respectively
under control numbers 0348-0043, 0348-0044, 0348-0040, and 0348-0046
and 0605-0001. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
Executive Order 12866: It has been determined that this notice is
not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism): It has been determined that
this notice does not contain policies with Federalism implications as
that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
Administrative Procedure Act/Regulatory Flexibility Act: Prior
notice and an opportunity for public comment are not required by the
Administrative Procedure Act or any other law for rules concerning
public property, grants, benefits, and contracts (5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2)).
Because notice and opportunity for comments are not required
pursuant to U.S.C. 553 or any other law, the analytical requirements of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are inapplicable.
Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required and none
has been prepared.
Stephen B. Brandt,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator, OAR, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-5184 Filed 4-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P