Highway Performance Monitoring System-Reassessment, 18134-18136 [E6-5139]
Download as PDF
18134
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Notices
AGENCY:
This notice requests public comment on
issues to be reviewed as part of the
reassessment. The FHWA working
papers developed during the conduct of
this reassessment will be placed in the
docket for review and comment.
DATES: This docket will remain open
until the reassessment is complete. The
anticipated completion date is
September 30, 2007. However, in order
for comments to be considered in the
early stages of the reassessment,
comments should be submitted on or
before June 9, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver
comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Dockets Management
Facility, Room PL–401, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590–
0001, or submit electronically at https://
dms.dot.gov/submit, or fax comments to
(202) 493–2251. All comments should
include the docket number that appears
in the heading of this document. All
comments received will be available for
examination and copying at the above
address from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. Those desiring notification of
receipt of comments must include a selfaddressed, stamped postcard or you
may print the acknowledgement page
that appears after submitting comments
electronically. Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comments (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70, Pages 19477–78) or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David Winter, Highway System
Performance Division, Office of
Highway Information, (202) 366–0175,
David.Winter@fhwa.dot.gov; or Janet
Myers, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202)
366–2019, Janet.Myers@fhwa.dot.gov;
Federal Highway Administration,
Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m.
to 4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY: The FHWA is initiating a
reassessment of the Highway
Performance Monitoring System
(HPMS), which is a national highway
transportation system database
maintained and used by the FHWA.
Electronic Access
You may submit or retrieve comments
online through the Document
Management System (DMS) at: https://
dms.dot.gov/submit. The DMS is
available 24 hours each day, 365 days
each year. Electronic submission and
retrieval help and guidelines are
This notice applies to all Federal
agency decisions as of the issuance date
of this notice and all laws under which
such actions were taken, including but
not limited to:
1. General: National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321–
4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23
U.S.C. 109].
2. Air: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401–
7671(q).
3. Land: Section 4(f) of the
Department of Transportation Act of
1966 [49 U.S.C. 303].
4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act
[16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and Section
1536].
5. Historic and Cultural Resources:
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended
[16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.].
6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights
Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000(d)–
2000(d)(1)]; Farmland Protection Policy
Act (FPPA) [7 U.S.C. 4201–4209].
7. Wetlands and Water Resources:
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251–1377
(Section 404, Section 401, Section 319).
8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990
Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988
Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898,
Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low Income
Populations.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Issued on: April 4, 2006.
Norman R. Stoner,
Division Administrator, FWHA, Illinois
Division, Springfield, Illinois.
[FR Doc. 06–3374 Filed 4–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA–2006–23638]
Highway Performance Monitoring
System—Reassessment
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Apr 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
available under the help section of the
Web site.
An electronic copy of this notice may
be downloaded from the Office of the
Federal Register’s home page at https://
www.archives.gov and the Government
Printing Office’s Web site at https://
www.access.gpo.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in a Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (70 FR
19477), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Background
The HPMS was developed in 1978 as
a national highway transportation
system database. The HPMS replaced
numerous annual State data reports and
biennial special studies conducted by
each State for the FHWA. The FHWA
used data from those reports and
biennial special studies, and
subsequently from HPMS, in reports to
Congress pursuant to title 23, U.S.C.,
section 307 (current statutory provisions
relating to the FHWA’s biennial
Conditions and Performance Reports are
contained in 23, U.S.C., section 502(h)).
The data gathered in HPMS also are
used for a variety of FHWA functions,
including apportionment of Federal-aid
Highway Funds to individual States and
assessment of changes in highway
system performance.
A major purpose of the HPMS always
has been to provide data that reflect the
extent, condition, performance, use, and
operating characteristics of the Nation’s
highways. In order to meet this primary
objective, the HPMS has gone through
an evolutionary process that has
recognized the changing needs for
accurate and timely data. For the most
part, changes to the HPMS over its
nearly 30-year life reflect adjustments
that respond to legislative and other
changes in the the Federal-aid highway
program.
The HPMS was originally
implemented as a national sample-based
monitoring system. The sample data
was supplemented with area-wide
mileage, travel, and other data as a
means to provide control total
information and for other analytical
purposes. In 1980, the HPMS was
merged with the Mileage Facilities
Reporting System (MFRS), which was a
basic inventory system that included
facility mileage, travel, and accident
statistics. After the HPMS and MFRS
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Notices
systems were merged, a single system
evolved to include the universe data
attributes of the MFRS and the sample
and area-wide data attributes of the
original HPMS.
In 1988, the HPMS was enhanced
with the addition of detailed pavement
data, including International Roughness
Index (IRI) measurements of pavement
roughness. The HPMS was revised again
in 1993 to address changes in the
FHWA analysis and simulation models,
including the shift to a geographic
information system (GIS) environment;
the effects of the 1990 Census; the
Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) (Pub. L.
102–240, 105 Stat. 1914); the Clean Air
Act Amendments of 1990 (Pub. L. 101–
549, 104 Stat. 2399); and the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
requirements concerning vehicle miles
of travel (VMT) tracking data in air
quality non-attainment areas (See
Section 187, VMT Forecasting and
Tracking Guidance, 57 FR 9549 (March
19, 1992)). The 1993 revision of the
HPMS added nearly a dozen universal
data items to be collected for the
National Highway System (NHS) and
other principal arterial highways. The
amount of sample traffic data for
urbanized air quality non-attainment
areas was increased, as were the percent
truck data requirements. Several
pavement data items were deleted in
their entirety, as were sample data items
for rural minor collectors.
In 1999, the FHWA reassessed the
HPMS. The final report from that
reassessment is available online at
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohpi/
hpms/hpmspubs.htm. As a result of the
1999 reassessment, the FHWA made
substantial changes to the number and
detail of the data items in HPMS. The
FHWA eliminated 15 data items and
changed 21 others, thereby eliminating
90 reported detail lines and adding one
new item. Most notably, to eliminate
duplication with the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration’s Fatality
Analysis Reporting System (FARS)
database, the reporting of fatal and
injury crash data provided by the States
on a summary basis by functional
system was discontinued. Through the
1999 reassessment, the HPMS was
positioned to maximize the use of new
technologies for collecting and reporting
data.
In its current configuration, the HPMS
includes limited data on all public
roads, more detailed data for a sample
of the arterial and collector functional
road systems, and area-wide summary
information for urbanized, small urban,
and rural areas.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Apr 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
Reassessment Purpose
The purpose of the reassessment is to
review the HPMS in light of
contemporary issues and anticipated
future needs. The reassessment will
determine what changes, if any, are
necessary at this time. The recent
reauthorization of the Federal-aid
highway program, as contained in the
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient,
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU) (Pub. L. 109–59,
119 Stat. 1144), provides an appropriate
opportunity and framework for the
FHWA to undertake a reassessment of
the HPMS. Other reasons to reexamine
the HPMS are further advancements in
technology, requirements of the
Government Performance and Results
Act of 1993 (GPRA) (Pub. L. 103–62, 107
Stat. 285), changes to State data
requirements, increased use of
performance measures, and changes in
the various uses of HPMS data by
government, academia, and the private
sector.
Reassessment Plan
The FHWA will undertake an open
approach to complete the reassessment.
Major emphasis will be directed
towards determining the data needs of
FHWA’s partners, stakeholders, and
customers, the various uses of the
existing HPMS, and the ability of data
providers to support these data needs.
The parameters of the reassessment will
include critical issues related to the
future form and direction of the HPMS.
Issues on which the FHWA will solicit
comment will include, but not be
limited to, the following:
(a) The purpose, scope and objectives
of the existing HPMS;
(b) Uses of HPMS data;
(c) Better integration of the HPMS and
the existing State and local data
processes; and
(d) More effective collection of HPMS
data.
The FHWA invites comments on these,
or other appropriate issues for
consideration in the reassessment.
As a part of the reassessment, the
FHWA will conduct a series of
workshops, geographically coordinated
throughout the country, at which
interested parties will have the
opportunity to provide input and
explore potential alternatives for a
future HPMS. The FHWA will post
specific workshop dates and locations
online at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
policy/ohpi/hpms/index.htm. Soon after
the workshops take place, the FHWA
will place the workshop minutes and
other supporting documents in the
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18135
docket noted above for review and
comment.
To achieve the maximum opportunity
for participation in this reassessment of
the HPMS by those customers,
stakeholders, partners, and other
interests that are impacted by the
HPMS, significant effort will be made to
facilitate public outreach and
involvement. In addition to the
workshops described above,
mechanisms that are being provided for
this effort include, but are not limited
to, the following elements:
(a) Participation of the general public
and interest groups through a review
and comment process on working
documents, as well as interim and final
products, submitted pursuant to this
notice and docket;
(b) Participation of the general public
and interest groups through attendance
at national/regional meeting(s);
(c) Participation of the transportation
community at large through the
Transportation Research Board (TRB),
which is a division of the National
Research Council of the National
Academies and is responsible for
promoting innovation and progress in
transportation through research;
(d) Participation of States through the
American Association of State Highway
and Transportation Officials (AASHTO),
which is a nonprofit nonpartisan
association representing highway and
transportation departments in the 50
States, the District of Columbia, and
Puerto Rico;
(e) Participation of the metropolitan
planning organizations (MPOs) through
the Association of Metropolitan
Planning Organizations (AMPO);
(f) Participation of organizations
which represent non-government users
of the HPMS data; and,
(g) Participation of technical experts
from the following entities: States;
FHWA; other Federal agencies such as
Research & Innovative Technology
Administration (RITA) and National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA); AASHTO staff; AASHTO
Standing Committee on Planning
(SCOP); Metropolitan Planning
Organizations; and academia. These
technical experts will have the
opportunity to attend meetings in order
to identify present and future data needs
for HPMS users and to provide input on
balancing needs with resource
requirements. The meetings are
designed to gather facts, information
and individual advice or
recommendations. Comments on the
elements of the outreach program for the
reassessment are invited.
The FHWA will prepare
recommendations for the HPMS, taking
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
18136
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Notices
into consideration comments made
directly through the docket, raised at the
various workshops, and collected
through other outreach efforts. The
FHWA expects to complete its
recommendations by February 28, 2007,
and publish them in the Federal
Register for public review and
comment.
The FHWA is initiating this
reassessment with the intention of
maximizing public input and providing
as much flexibility as possible in
meeting future HPMS data needs.
However, there are a number of
principal objectives that will guide the
outcome of the reassessment effort.
First, the future HPMS will need to
support any changes to the FHWA’s
stewardship and oversight
responsibilities that result from
SAFETEA–LU. In addition, the future
HPMS will need to continue to support
various Congressional requirements,
including the Conditions and
Performance Reports and those imposed
by the GPRA. Finally, the outcome of
the reassessment process must recognize
the national interest in the NHS and the
need to continue to assess highway
conditions and performance at the
national level.
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 502; 23 CFR 1.5.
Issued on: April 3, 2006.
J. Richard Capka,
Acting Federal Highway Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–5139 Filed 4–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2006–24624]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Request for Comment;
Renewal of an Existing Information
Collection: Annual and Quarterly
Reports of Class I Motor Carriers of
Passengers (Formerly OMB 2139–
0003)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces that
the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA) intends to
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) its request to renew a
currently-approved information
collection for Class I Motor Carriers of
Passengers, Form MP–1, Annual and
Quarterly Reports. This information
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Apr 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
collection is necessary to ensure that
motor carriers comply with financial
and operating statistics requirements at
49 CFR part 1420. This notice is
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before June 9, 2006.
ADDRESSES: All comments should
reference Docket No. FMCSA–2006–
24624. You may mail or hand deliver
comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Dockets Management
Facility, Room PL–401, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590;
telefax comments to 202/493–2251; or
submit electronically at https://
dms.dot.gov.
You may examine and copy all
comments received at the above address
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
If you desire your comment to be
acknowledged, you must include a selfaddressed stamped envelope or postcard
or, if you submit your comments
electronically, you may print the
acknowledgment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Toni Proctor, Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration Office of
Research and Analysis, Washington, DC
20590, phone (202) 366–2998, FAX
(202) 366–3518, e-mail
Toni.Proctor@fmcsa.dot.gov, Office
hours are from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For-hire
Class I motor carriers of passengers
(including interstate and intrastate) 1 are
required to file Motor Carrier Quarterly
and Annual Reports (Form MP–1) that
provide financial and operating data
(see 49 U.S.C. 14123). The agency uses
this information to assess the health of
the industry and identify industry
changes that may affect national
transportation policy. The data also
show company financial stability and
traffic patterns. Motor carriers of
1 For purposes of the Financial & Operating
Statistics (F&OS) program, passenger carriers are
classified into the following two groups: (1) Class
I carriers are those having average annual gross
transportation operating revenues (including
interstate and intrastate) of $5 million or more from
passenger motor carrier operations after applying
the revenue deflator formula in the Note of section
1420.3; (2) Class II passenger carriers are those
having average annual gross transportation
operating revenues (including interstate and
intrastate) of less than $5 million from passenger
motor carrier operations after applying the revenue
deflator formula as shown in Note A of section
1420.3. Only Class I carriers of passengers are
required to file Annual and Quarterly Report Form
MP–1, but Class II passenger carriers must notify
the agency when there is a change in their
classification or their revenues exceed the Class II
limit.
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
passengers required to comply with the
regulations are classified on the basis of
their annual gross carrier operating
revenues. Under the F&OS program the
FMCSA collects balance sheet and
income statement data along with
information on tonnage, mileage,
employees, transportation equipment,
and other related data.
The data and information collected is
made publicly available as prescribed in
49 CFR part 1420. The regulations were
formerly administered by the Interstate
Commerce Commission (ICC), the
Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.
11145, 49 U.S.C. 11343(d)(1) and the
Bus Regulatory Act of 1982 and later
transferred to the U.S. Department of
Transportation on January 1, 1996, by
the ICC Termination Act of 1995
(ICCTA) (Pub. L. 104–88, 109 Stat.803
(Dec. 29, 1995)), now codified at 49
U.S.C. 14123. The Secretary of
Transportation (Secretary) transferred
the authority to administer the F&OS
program to the former Bureau of
Transportation Statistics on September
30, 1998 (63 FR 52192). Pursuant to this
authority, the BTS, now part of the
Research and Innovative Technology
Administration (RITA), became the
responsible DOT modal administration
for implementing the F&OS program
and requirements at 49 CFR part 1420.
On September 29, 2004, the Secretary
transferred the responsibility for the
F&OS program from BTS, to FMCSA (69
FR 51009). FMCSA plans to publish a
final rule in the future to transfer and redesignate the F&OS program reporting
requirements at part 1420, title 49 of the
CFR, from BTS (now RITA) to FMCSA.
Type of Information Collection
Request: Renewal of an existing
information collection.
Title of Information Collection:
Annual and Quarterly Report of Class I
Motor Carriers. of Passengers (formerly
OMB 2139–0004).
OMB Control Number: 2126–0031.
Respondents: Class I Motor Carriers of
Passengers.
Frequency: Quarterly and annually.
Estimated Annual Number of
Respondents: 26.
Estimated Annual Number of
Responses: 130.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: 1.5 hours per response.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 195 hours [130 responses × 1.5
hours per response = 195 hours].
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection is
necessary for the FMCSA’s performance;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burden; (3) ways for the FMCSA to
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18134-18136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-5139]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA-2006-23638]
Highway Performance Monitoring System--Reassessment
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA is initiating a reassessment of the Highway
Performance Monitoring System (HPMS), which is a national highway
transportation system database maintained and used by the FHWA. This
notice requests public comment on issues to be reviewed as part of the
reassessment. The FHWA working papers developed during the conduct of
this reassessment will be placed in the docket for review and comment.
DATES: This docket will remain open until the reassessment is complete.
The anticipated completion date is September 30, 2007. However, in
order for comments to be considered in the early stages of the
reassessment, comments should be submitted on or before June 9, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Dockets Management Facility, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001, or submit electronically at
https://dms.dot.gov/submit, or fax comments to (202) 493-2251. All
comments should include the docket number that appears in the heading
of this document. All comments received will be available for
examination and copying at the above address from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Those desiring
notification of receipt of comments must include a self-addressed,
stamped postcard or you may print the acknowledgement page that appears
after submitting comments electronically. Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comments (or signing the comment,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70, Pages
19477-78) or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Winter, Highway System
Performance Division, Office of Highway Information, (202) 366-0175,
David.Winter@fhwa.dot.gov; or Janet Myers, Office of the Chief Counsel,
(202) 366-2019, Janet.Myers@fhwa.dot.gov; Federal Highway
Administration, Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m.,
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may submit or retrieve comments online through the Document
Management System (DMS) at: https://dms.dot.gov/submit. The DMS is
available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. Electronic submission
and retrieval help and guidelines are available under the help section
of the Web site.
An electronic copy of this notice may be downloaded from the Office
of the Federal Register's home page at https://www.archives.gov and the
Government Printing Office's Web site at https://www.access.gpo.gov.
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in a Federal Register published on April
11, 2000 (70 FR 19477), or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Background
The HPMS was developed in 1978 as a national highway transportation
system database. The HPMS replaced numerous annual State data reports
and biennial special studies conducted by each State for the FHWA. The
FHWA used data from those reports and biennial special studies, and
subsequently from HPMS, in reports to Congress pursuant to title 23,
U.S.C., section 307 (current statutory provisions relating to the
FHWA's biennial Conditions and Performance Reports are contained in 23,
U.S.C., section 502(h)). The data gathered in HPMS also are used for a
variety of FHWA functions, including apportionment of Federal-aid
Highway Funds to individual States and assessment of changes in highway
system performance.
A major purpose of the HPMS always has been to provide data that
reflect the extent, condition, performance, use, and operating
characteristics of the Nation's highways. In order to meet this primary
objective, the HPMS has gone through an evolutionary process that has
recognized the changing needs for accurate and timely data. For the
most part, changes to the HPMS over its nearly 30-year life reflect
adjustments that respond to legislative and other changes in the the
Federal-aid highway program.
The HPMS was originally implemented as a national sample-based
monitoring system. The sample data was supplemented with area-wide
mileage, travel, and other data as a means to provide control total
information and for other analytical purposes. In 1980, the HPMS was
merged with the Mileage Facilities Reporting System (MFRS), which was a
basic inventory system that included facility mileage, travel, and
accident statistics. After the HPMS and MFRS
[[Page 18135]]
systems were merged, a single system evolved to include the universe
data attributes of the MFRS and the sample and area-wide data
attributes of the original HPMS.
In 1988, the HPMS was enhanced with the addition of detailed
pavement data, including International Roughness Index (IRI)
measurements of pavement roughness. The HPMS was revised again in 1993
to address changes in the FHWA analysis and simulation models,
including the shift to a geographic information system (GIS)
environment; the effects of the 1990 Census; the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) (Pub. L. 102-240, 105
Stat. 1914); the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-549, 104
Stat. 2399); and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements
concerning vehicle miles of travel (VMT) tracking data in air quality
non-attainment areas (See Section 187, VMT Forecasting and Tracking
Guidance, 57 FR 9549 (March 19, 1992)). The 1993 revision of the HPMS
added nearly a dozen universal data items to be collected for the
National Highway System (NHS) and other principal arterial highways.
The amount of sample traffic data for urbanized air quality non-
attainment areas was increased, as were the percent truck data
requirements. Several pavement data items were deleted in their
entirety, as were sample data items for rural minor collectors.
In 1999, the FHWA reassessed the HPMS. The final report from that
reassessment is available online at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/
ohpi/hpms/hpmspubs.htm. As a result of the 1999 reassessment, the FHWA
made substantial changes to the number and detail of the data items in
HPMS. The FHWA eliminated 15 data items and changed 21 others, thereby
eliminating 90 reported detail lines and adding one new item. Most
notably, to eliminate duplication with the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration's Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS)
database, the reporting of fatal and injury crash data provided by the
States on a summary basis by functional system was discontinued.
Through the 1999 reassessment, the HPMS was positioned to maximize the
use of new technologies for collecting and reporting data.
In its current configuration, the HPMS includes limited data on all
public roads, more detailed data for a sample of the arterial and
collector functional road systems, and area-wide summary information
for urbanized, small urban, and rural areas.
Reassessment Purpose
The purpose of the reassessment is to review the HPMS in light of
contemporary issues and anticipated future needs. The reassessment will
determine what changes, if any, are necessary at this time. The recent
reauthorization of the Federal-aid highway program, as contained in the
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient, Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) (Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144),
provides an appropriate opportunity and framework for the FHWA to
undertake a reassessment of the HPMS. Other reasons to reexamine the
HPMS are further advancements in technology, requirements of the
Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) (Pub. L. 103-62,
107 Stat. 285), changes to State data requirements, increased use of
performance measures, and changes in the various uses of HPMS data by
government, academia, and the private sector.
Reassessment Plan
The FHWA will undertake an open approach to complete the
reassessment. Major emphasis will be directed towards determining the
data needs of FHWA's partners, stakeholders, and customers, the various
uses of the existing HPMS, and the ability of data providers to support
these data needs. The parameters of the reassessment will include
critical issues related to the future form and direction of the HPMS.
Issues on which the FHWA will solicit comment will include, but not be
limited to, the following:
(a) The purpose, scope and objectives of the existing HPMS;
(b) Uses of HPMS data;
(c) Better integration of the HPMS and the existing State and local
data processes; and
(d) More effective collection of HPMS data.
The FHWA invites comments on these, or other appropriate issues for
consideration in the reassessment.
As a part of the reassessment, the FHWA will conduct a series of
workshops, geographically coordinated throughout the country, at which
interested parties will have the opportunity to provide input and
explore potential alternatives for a future HPMS. The FHWA will post
specific workshop dates and locations online at https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohpi/hpms/index.htm. Soon after the workshops
take place, the FHWA will place the workshop minutes and other
supporting documents in the docket noted above for review and comment.
To achieve the maximum opportunity for participation in this
reassessment of the HPMS by those customers, stakeholders, partners,
and other interests that are impacted by the HPMS, significant effort
will be made to facilitate public outreach and involvement. In addition
to the workshops described above, mechanisms that are being provided
for this effort include, but are not limited to, the following
elements:
(a) Participation of the general public and interest groups through
a review and comment process on working documents, as well as interim
and final products, submitted pursuant to this notice and docket;
(b) Participation of the general public and interest groups through
attendance at national/regional meeting(s);
(c) Participation of the transportation community at large through
the Transportation Research Board (TRB), which is a division of the
National Research Council of the National Academies and is responsible
for promoting innovation and progress in transportation through
research;
(d) Participation of States through the American Association of
State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), which is a
nonprofit nonpartisan association representing highway and
transportation departments in the 50 States, the District of Columbia,
and Puerto Rico;
(e) Participation of the metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs)
through the Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO);
(f) Participation of organizations which represent non-government
users of the HPMS data; and,
(g) Participation of technical experts from the following entities:
States; FHWA; other Federal agencies such as Research & Innovative
Technology Administration (RITA) and National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA); AASHTO staff; AASHTO Standing Committee on
Planning (SCOP); Metropolitan Planning Organizations; and academia.
These technical experts will have the opportunity to attend meetings in
order to identify present and future data needs for HPMS users and to
provide input on balancing needs with resource requirements. The
meetings are designed to gather facts, information and individual
advice or recommendations. Comments on the elements of the outreach
program for the reassessment are invited.
The FHWA will prepare recommendations for the HPMS, taking
[[Page 18136]]
into consideration comments made directly through the docket, raised at
the various workshops, and collected through other outreach efforts.
The FHWA expects to complete its recommendations by February 28, 2007,
and publish them in the Federal Register for public review and comment.
The FHWA is initiating this reassessment with the intention of
maximizing public input and providing as much flexibility as possible
in meeting future HPMS data needs. However, there are a number of
principal objectives that will guide the outcome of the reassessment
effort. First, the future HPMS will need to support any changes to the
FHWA's stewardship and oversight responsibilities that result from
SAFETEA-LU. In addition, the future HPMS will need to continue to
support various Congressional requirements, including the Conditions
and Performance Reports and those imposed by the GPRA. Finally, the
outcome of the reassessment process must recognize the national
interest in the NHS and the need to continue to assess highway
conditions and performance at the national level.
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 502; 23 CFR 1.5.
Issued on: April 3, 2006.
J. Richard Capka,
Acting Federal Highway Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6-5139 Filed 4-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P