Sweet Cherries Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Removal of Container Regulations, 17979-17982 [06-3419]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—Continued
Column B
maturity
guide
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Column A
variety
King Sweet .............................
Lacey ......................................
Lady Lou ................................
Lady Sue ................................
Late Ito Red ...........................
Madonna Sun .........................
Magenta Queen .....................
May Crest ...............................
May Sun .................................
May Sweet .............................
Merrill Gem ............................
Merrill Gemfree ......................
Morning Lord ..........................
O’Henry ..................................
Pacifica ...................................
Pretty Lady .............................
Prima Gattie 8 ........................
Prima Gattie 10 ......................
Prima Peach IV ......................
Prima Peach 23 .....................
Queencrest .............................
Ray Crest ...............................
Red Dancer (Red Boy) ..........
Redhaven ...............................
Red Lady ................................
Redtop ....................................
Regina ....................................
Rich Lady ...............................
Rich May ................................
Rich Mike ...............................
Rio Oso Gem .........................
Royal Lady .............................
Royal May ..............................
Ruby May ...............................
Ryan Sun ...............................
September Sun ......................
Shelly .....................................
Sierra Gem .............................
Sierra Lady .............................
Sparkle ...................................
Sprague Last Chance ............
Springcrest .............................
Spring Delight ........................
Spring Gem ............................
Spring Lady ............................
Springtreat (60EF32) .............
Sugar Time (214LC68) ..........
Summer Kist ..........................
Summer Lady .........................
Summerset .............................
Summer Zee ..........................
Suncrest .................................
Supechfour (Amber Crest) .....
Super Rich .............................
Sweet Amber .........................
Sweet Dream .........................
Sweet Gem ............................
Sweet Mick .............................
Sweet Scarlet .........................
Sweet September ..................
Topcrest .................................
Tra Zee ..................................
Vista .......................................
Willie Red ...............................
Zee Diamond .........................
Zee Lady ................................
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
I
I
I
L
L
J
J
G
I
I
G
G
J
I
G
J
L
J
J
J
G
G
I
G
G
G
G
J
H
H
I
J
G
H
I
I
J
J
I
I
L
G
G
J
H
I
I
J
L
I
L
G
G
H
J
J
J
J
J
I
H
J
J
G
J
L
*
16:33 Apr 07, 2006
(3) Any package or container of Island
Prince, Snow Kist, Snow Peak or Super
Rich variety peaches unless:
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Any package or container of
Babcock, Bev’s Red, Bright Princess,
Brittney Lane, Burpeachone (Spring
Flame 21), Burpeachfourteen (Spring
Flame 20), Burpeachnineteen (Spring
Flame 22), Crimson Lady, Crown
Princess, David Sun, Early May Crest,
Flavorcrest, Honey Sweet, Ivory Queen,
June Lady, Magenta Queen, May Crest,
May Sun, May Sweet, Prima Peach IV,
Queencrest, Rich May, Scarlet Queen,
Sierra Snow, Snow Brite, Snow Prince,
Springcrest, Spring Lady, Spring Snow,
Springtreat (60EF32), Sugar Time
(214LC68), Sunlit Snow (172LE81),
Supecheight (012–094), Sweet Scarlet,
Sweet Crest or Zee Diamond variety
peaches unless:
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Any package or container of
August Lady, Autumn Flame, Autumn
Red, Autumn Rich, Autumn Rose,
Autumn Snow, Burpeachtwo (Henry
II), Burpeachthree (September
Flame), Burpeachfour (August
Flame), Burpeachfive (July Flame),
Burpeachsix (June Flame),
Burpeachseven (Summer Flame 29),
Coral Princess, Country Sweet, Crimson
Queen, Diamond Princess, Earlirich,
Early Elegant Lady, Elegant Lady, Fancy
Lady, Fay Elberta, Full Moon, Glacier
White, Henry III, Henry IV, Ice Princess,
Ivory Princess, Jasper Treasure, Jillie
White, Joanna Sweet, John Henry,
Jupiter, Kaweah, Klondike, Last Tango,
Late Ito Red, Magenta Gold, O’Henry,
Pink Giant, Pink Moon, Prima Gattie 8,
Prima Peach 13, Prima Peach XV, Prima
Peach 20, Prima Peach 23, Prima Peach
XXVII, Princess Gayle, Red Giant, Rich
Lady, Royal Lady, Ruby Queen, Ryan
Sun, Saturn (Donut), Scarlet Snow,
September Snow, September Sun, Sierra
Gem, Sierra Rich, Snow Beauty, Snow
Blaze, Snow Fall, Snow Gem, Snow
Giant, Snow Jewel, Snow King, Snow
Princess, Sprague Last Chance, Spring
Candy, Spring Gem, Sugar Crisp, Sugar
Giant, Sugar Lady, Summer Dragon,
Summer Lady, Summer Sweet, Summer
Zee, Sweet Blaze, Sweet Dream, Sweet
Kay, Sweet September, Tra Zee, Valley
Sweet, Vista, White Lady, Zee Lady, or
24–SB variety peaches unless:
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: April 5, 2006.
Lloyd C Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–3420 Filed 4–6–06; 9:41 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17979
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 923
[Docket No. FV06–923–1 IFR]
Sweet Cherries Grown in Designated
Counties in Washington; Removal of
Container Regulations
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule removes the
container regulations prescribed under
the Washington sweet cherry marketing
order. Specifically, this rule removes the
requirement that dark-colored sweet
cherries must be handled in containers
having a certain net weight. The
marketing order regulates the handling
of fresh sweet cherries grown in
designated counties in the State of
Washington, and is administered locally
by the Washington Cherry Marketing
Committee (Committee). By eliminating
the container requirements, this
relaxation will provide handlers with
the ability to meet the rapidly changing
wholesale, retail, and consumer demand
for innovative product packaging. This
is expected to enhance industry
marketing flexibility and efficiency.
DATES: Effective April 11, 2006.
Comments received by June 9, 2006 will
be considered prior to issuance of a final
rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; E-mail:
moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or Internet:
https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the docket
number and the date and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public
inspection in the Office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours or
can be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. Curry, Northwest Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220
SW Third Avenue, Suite 385, Portland,
Oregon 97204–2807; Telephone: (503)
326–2724; Fax: (503) 326–7440; or
George Kelhart, Technical Advisor,
E:\FR\FM\10APR1.SGM
10APR1
17980
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491; Fax: (202) 720–8938.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone (202) 720–
2491; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or e-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 923 (7 CFR part 923)
regulating the handling of sweet
cherries grown in designated counties in
Washington, hereinafter referred to as
the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–
674), hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule removes the container
regulations prescribed under the
Washington sweet cherry order.
Specifically, this rule removes the
requirement that dark-colored sweet
cherries must be handled in containers
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:33 Apr 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
having a certain net weight. By
eliminating the container requirements,
this relaxation provides handlers with
the ability to meet the rapidly changing
wholesale, retail, and consumer demand
for innovative product packaging,
thereby enhancing industry marketing
flexibility and efficiency.
Section 923.52 of the order authorizes
the issuance of regulations for grade,
size, quality, maturity, pack, and
container for any variety of sweet
cherries grown in the production area.
Section 923.52(a)(3) specifically
authorizes the establishment of the
container regulations found in
§ 923.322. Section 923.53 authorizes the
modification, suspension, or
termination of regulations issued
pursuant to § 923.52.
Authority to regulate the size,
capacity, weight, dimension, markings
or pack of containers used in the
handling of fresh sweet cherries was
included in the order when
promulgated in 1957. This authority
was included in the order to facilitate
container standardization and thus help
establish orderly marketing conditions
and increase producer returns.
The Committee meets prior to each
season to consider recommendations for
modification, suspension, or
termination of any regulatory
requirements for Washington sweet
cherries that are issued on a continuing
basis. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
The USDA reviews the Committee
recommendations along with any
supportive information submitted by the
Committee, as well as information from
other available resources, and
determines whether modification,
suspension, or termination of the
regulatory requirements would tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
At its February 28, 2006, meeting, the
Committee recommended that the
container regulations be entirely
removed from the handling regulations.
The Committee recommended that this
rule be effective as early as May 1, 2006,
to ensure that the earliest shipments of
sweet cherries benefit from the relaxed
regulations, and that container
manufacturers have adequate time prior
to the beginning of the shipping season
to retool if new containers are ordered
by the industry.
The container requirements provide
the Washington cherry industry with
container standardization to help ensure
orderly marketing conditions and
increased producer returns. Section
923.322(d) provides that: ‘‘No handler
shall handle any lot of cherries, except
cherries of the Rainier, Royal Anne, and
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
similar varieties commonly referred to
as ‘‘light sweet cherries’’, unless such
cherries are in containers which meet
each of the following applicable
requirements:
(1) The net weight of loose packed
(jumble-filled) cherries in any container
shall be 12 pounds or less, or 20 pounds
or more. The net weight of face packed
cherries in any container shall be 15
pounds, or 12 pounds or less: Provided,
That containers with a net weight of 12
pounds or less may be packed together
with like containers in a master
shipping container.
(2) Subject to the provisions of
paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (ii) of this
section, shipments of cherries may be
handled in such experimental
containers as have been approved by the
Washington Cherry Marketing
Committee.’’
Paragraph (2) above refers to the
provisions of § 923.322(b)(2)(i) and (ii),
which specify that: ‘‘(i) All shipments
handled in such containers shall be
under the supervision of the committee;
and (ii) at least 90 percent, by count, of
the cherries in any lot of such
containers shall measure not less than
54⁄64 inch in diameter, and not more
than 5 percent, by count, may be less
than 52⁄64 inch in diameter.’’ Because the
provisions of (b)(2)(i) and (ii) refer to
experimental containers exempt under
923.322(d)(2), this rule also removes
both paragraphs from the handling
regulations.
Comments made at the public meeting
indicate that container standardization
has contributed to orderly marketing in
the past. Due to the changing dynamics
in the fresh produce industry, however,
buyers—at the wholesale, retail and
consumer level—are seeking many more
packaging options than have been
available in the past. Handlers report
that buyers are increasingly interested
in non-traditional packaging options
designed for better handling and greater
consumer acceptance. Handlers also
desire greater latitude in choosing the
optimum weight for a particular type of
pack. Of specific concern to this
industry is the ability to pack cherries
in containers with net weights of
between 12 and 20 pounds—a weight
range specifically barred under the
container regulation. Packaging options
could also include consumer-friendly
‘‘clam shell’’ containers of any desired
net weight, or other similar containers
designed to enhance the appearance of
individual pieces of fruit.
Although § 923.322(d)(2) provides for
experimental container exemptions,
those handlers who have utilized this
exemption in the past feel that the
process is too cumbersome and time-
E:\FR\FM\10APR1.SGM
10APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
consuming, thus failing to provide the
optimal flexibility they need under
current marketing conditions.
Regardless of the size, capacity, or
type containers the industry may
eventually use, the Committee believes
that the Washington cherry industry
desires flexibility in packaging darkcolored sweet cherries. This action will
provide the industry with needed
flexibility.
This rule not only removes the
container regulations in § 923.322(d)),
but also makes necessary conforming
changes by removing § 923.322(b)(2)(i)
and (ii), and removing references to
container requirements in
§ 923.322(f)(1)(ii) and § 923.322(g).
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 1,500 cherry
producers within the regulated
production area and approximately 53
regulated handlers. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $6,000,000.
For the 2005 shipping season, the
Washington Agricultural Statistics
Service has prepared a preliminary
report showing that the total 113,000
ton fresh market sweet cherry utilization
sold for an average of $2,830 per ton.
Based on the number of producers in
the production area, the average
producer revenue from the sale of sweet
cherries in 2005 is estimated at
approximately $213,200 per year. In
addition, the Committee reports that
most of the industry’s 53 handlers
would have each averaged gross receipts
of less than $6,000,000 from the sale of
fresh sweet cherries last season. Thus,
the majority of producers and handlers
of Washington sweet cherries may be
classified as small entities.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:33 Apr 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
At its February 28, 2006, meeting the
Committee recommended that the
container regulations in § 923.322(d) be
removed from the order’s rules and
regulations. Section 923.52(a)(3) of the
order specifically authorizes the
establishment of container regulations.
Further, § 923.53 authorizes the
modification, suspension, or
termination of regulations issued
pursuant to § 923.52. This relaxation in
the regulations provides handlers with
the ability to meet the rapidly changing
wholesale, retail, and consumer demand
for innovative product packaging, thus
enhancing industry marketing flexibility
and efficiency.
The Committee anticipates that this
rule will not negatively impact small
businesses. This rule removes the
container requirements found under
§ 923.322(d) of the order’s rules and
regulations, and, thus, should provide
the industry with greater marketing
opportunities. The Committee believes
that any additional costs this rule may
have on the industry would be
associated with the development and
use of new containers. Such costs would
likely be offset by new marketing
opportunities.
The Committee discussed alternatives
to its recommendation to remove the
container regulations. The Committee
explored the option of leaving the
container regulations intact without
change. This option was rejected as
being an inadequate response to the
demand for greater flexibility in the
packaging of fresh cherries. Temporary
suspension of the regulations was
considered, and then discarded, as also
being inadequate for the current
marketing situation.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
cherry handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to compliance
with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires
Government agencies in general to
provide the public the option of
submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible.
In addition, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
rule.
The Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the Washington
cherry industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17981
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations. Like all Committee
meetings, the February 28, 2006,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express their views on this issue.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on
removal of the container regulations
under the Washington cherry marketing
order. Any comments received will be
considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
Committee’s recommendation, and
other information, it is found that the
regulation removed by this action no
longer tends to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule removes the
container regulations for Washington
sweet cherries for the 2006 shipping
season and subsequent seasons; (2) this
rule should be in effect by May 15,
2006, the date 2006 season shipments of
the Washington sweet cherry crop are
expected to begin, and this action
should apply to the entire season’s
shipments; (3) the removal of the
container regulations was recommended
by the Committee at a public meeting
and all interested persons had an
opportunity to express their views and
provide input; (4) Washington cherry
handlers are aware of this
recommendation and need no
additional time to comply with the
relaxed requirements; and (5) this rule
provides a 60-day comment period, and
any comments received will be
considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 923
Cherries, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 923 is amended as
follows:
I
E:\FR\FM\10APR1.SGM
10APR1
17982
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
PART 923—SWEET CHERRIES
GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES
IN WASHINGTON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 923 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
§ 923.322
[Amended]
2. Section 923.322 is amended by:
a. Removing paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and
(b)(2)(ii);
I b. Removing and reserving paragraph
(d);
I c. Removing the word ‘‘container’’
from paragraph (f)(1)(ii); and
I d. Removing paragraph designation
‘‘(d)’’ in paragraph (g).
I
I
Dated: April 5, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–3419 Filed 4–6–06; 9:41 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
Background
The Direct and Counter-Cyclical
Program (DCP), authorized by Farm
Security and Rural Investment Act of
2002 (Pub. L. 107–171, May 13, 2002)
(‘‘2002 Act’’), provides payments to
eligible producers on farms enrolled for
the 2002 through 2007 crop years. There
are two types of DCP payments—direct
payments and counter-cyclical
payments. These payments provide
income support to producers of eligible
commodities and are based on
historically-based acreage and yields
and do not depend on the current
production choices of the farmer. DCP
replaces the Production Flexibility
Contract (PFC) payments made under
the Federal Agriculture Improvement
and Reform Act of 1996 for the crop
years 1996 through 2002. In addition to
the commodities that were eligible for
PFC payments, the 2002 Act also
provides for direct and counter-cyclical
payments for peanuts, soybeans,
sunflower seed and other oilseeds.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Explanation of Change
Commodity Credit Corporation
This rule implements section 1102 of
Title I of Subtitle A of the Deficit
Reduction Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109–171,
February 8, 2006). This section provides
that DCP advance direct payment
percentages will be reduced for fiscal
years 2006 and 2007 from 50 percent to
40 percent for the 2006 fiscal year, and
to 22 percent for the 2007 program year.
This rule amends the direct and
counter-cyclical program regulations at
7 CFR 1412.502(b) to reduce the
advance direct payment rate percentages
accordingly. Producers will continue to
have the option to receive advance
direct payments during any month from
December through September of the
applicable fiscal year.
7 CFR Part 1412
RIN 0560–AH49
Percentages for Direct and CounterCyclical Program Advance Payments
Commodity Credit Corporation,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule implements
the provisions of the Agricultural
Reconciliation Act of 2005 regarding
percentages used to determine payment
amounts for producers electing to
receive advance payments through the
Direct and Counter-Cyclical Program.
Reducing the direct payment advance
percentages shifts payments between
fiscal years, but will have no impact on
total payments.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule becomes
effective on April 10, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tracey Smith, Production, Emergencies
and Compliance Division, United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA), Stop
0517, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0517.
Telephone: (202) 720–4365. Electronic
mail: Tracey.Smith@wdc.usda.gov.
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication
(Braille, large print, audio tape, etc.)
should contact the USDA Target Center
at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:33 Apr 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
Notice and Comment
Section 1601(c) of the Farm Security
and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7
U.S.C 7991(c)), provides that the
regulations needed to implement Title I
of the 2002 Act (7 U.S.C. 7901 et seq.),
including those involved here, may be
promulgated without regard to the
notice and comment provisions of 5
U.S.C. 553 or the Statement of Policy of
the Secretary of Agriculture effective
July 24, 1971 relating to notices of
proposed rulemaking and public
participating in rulemaking.
Executive Order 12866
This rule is issued in conformance
with Executive Order 12866, was
determined to be economically
significant and was reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget. The
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
economic effects of this rule are
summarized below.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
It has been determined that the
Regulatory Flexibility Act is not
applicable to this rule because the CCC
is not required by 5 U.S.C. 533 or any
other law to publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking for the subject
matter of this rule.
Environmental Assessment
The environmental impacts of this
rule have been considered consistent
with the provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., the
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts
1500–1508), and the FSA regulations for
compliance with NEPA, 7 CFR part 799.
FSA concluded that the rule requires no
further environmental review because it
is administrative in nature and no
extraordinary circumstances or other
unforeseeable factors exist which would
require preparation of an environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with Executive Order 12988.
This rule will preempt State laws that
are inconsistent with it. Before any legal
action may be brought regarding a
determination under this rule, the
administrative appeal provisions set
forth at 7 CFR parts 11 and 780 must be
exhausted.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which require intergovernmental
consultation with State and local
officials. See the notice related to 7 CFR
part 3014, subpart V, published at 48 FR
29115 (June 24, 1983).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
The rule contains no Federal
mandates under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
for State, local, and tribal governments
or the private sector. Thus, this rule is
not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Section 1601(c) of the 2002 Act (7
U.S.C. 7991(c)) provides that the
promulgation of regulations and the
administration of Title I of the 2002 Act
shall be made without regard to chapter
5 of title 44 of the United States Code
E:\FR\FM\10APR1.SGM
10APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17979-17982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3419]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 923
[Docket No. FV06-923-1 IFR]
Sweet Cherries Grown in Designated Counties in Washington;
Removal of Container Regulations
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule removes the container regulations prescribed under
the Washington sweet cherry marketing order. Specifically, this rule
removes the requirement that dark-colored sweet cherries must be
handled in containers having a certain net weight. The marketing order
regulates the handling of fresh sweet cherries grown in designated
counties in the State of Washington, and is administered locally by the
Washington Cherry Marketing Committee (Committee). By eliminating the
container requirements, this relaxation will provide handlers with the
ability to meet the rapidly changing wholesale, retail, and consumer
demand for innovative product packaging. This is expected to enhance
industry marketing flexibility and efficiency.
DATES: Effective April 11, 2006. Comments received by June 9, 2006 will
be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the
docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for public inspection in the Office
of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours or can be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Curry, Northwest Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW Third Avenue, Suite 385,
Portland, Oregon 97204-2807; Telephone: (503) 326-2724; Fax: (503) 326-
7440; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor,
[[Page 17980]]
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491; Fax: (202) 720-8938.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone (202) 720-
2491; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or e-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 923 (7 CFR part 923) regulating the handling of
sweet cherries grown in designated counties in Washington, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule removes the container regulations prescribed under the
Washington sweet cherry order. Specifically, this rule removes the
requirement that dark-colored sweet cherries must be handled in
containers having a certain net weight. By eliminating the container
requirements, this relaxation provides handlers with the ability to
meet the rapidly changing wholesale, retail, and consumer demand for
innovative product packaging, thereby enhancing industry marketing
flexibility and efficiency.
Section 923.52 of the order authorizes the issuance of regulations
for grade, size, quality, maturity, pack, and container for any variety
of sweet cherries grown in the production area. Section 923.52(a)(3)
specifically authorizes the establishment of the container regulations
found in Sec. 923.322. Section 923.53 authorizes the modification,
suspension, or termination of regulations issued pursuant to Sec.
923.52.
Authority to regulate the size, capacity, weight, dimension,
markings or pack of containers used in the handling of fresh sweet
cherries was included in the order when promulgated in 1957. This
authority was included in the order to facilitate container
standardization and thus help establish orderly marketing conditions
and increase producer returns.
The Committee meets prior to each season to consider
recommendations for modification, suspension, or termination of any
regulatory requirements for Washington sweet cherries that are issued
on a continuing basis. Committee meetings are open to the public and
interested persons may express their views at these meetings. The USDA
reviews the Committee recommendations along with any supportive
information submitted by the Committee, as well as information from
other available resources, and determines whether modification,
suspension, or termination of the regulatory requirements would tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
At its February 28, 2006, meeting, the Committee recommended that
the container regulations be entirely removed from the handling
regulations. The Committee recommended that this rule be effective as
early as May 1, 2006, to ensure that the earliest shipments of sweet
cherries benefit from the relaxed regulations, and that container
manufacturers have adequate time prior to the beginning of the shipping
season to retool if new containers are ordered by the industry.
The container requirements provide the Washington cherry industry
with container standardization to help ensure orderly marketing
conditions and increased producer returns. Section 923.322(d) provides
that: ``No handler shall handle any lot of cherries, except cherries of
the Rainier, Royal Anne, and similar varieties commonly referred to as
``light sweet cherries'', unless such cherries are in containers which
meet each of the following applicable requirements:
(1) The net weight of loose packed (jumble-filled) cherries in any
container shall be 12 pounds or less, or 20 pounds or more. The net
weight of face packed cherries in any container shall be 15 pounds, or
12 pounds or less: Provided, That containers with a net weight of 12
pounds or less may be packed together with like containers in a master
shipping container.
(2) Subject to the provisions of paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (ii) of
this section, shipments of cherries may be handled in such experimental
containers as have been approved by the Washington Cherry Marketing
Committee.''
Paragraph (2) above refers to the provisions of Sec.
923.322(b)(2)(i) and (ii), which specify that: ``(i) All shipments
handled in such containers shall be under the supervision of the
committee; and (ii) at least 90 percent, by count, of the cherries in
any lot of such containers shall measure not less than \54/64\ inch in
diameter, and not more than 5 percent, by count, may be less than \52/
64\ inch in diameter.'' Because the provisions of (b)(2)(i) and (ii)
refer to experimental containers exempt under 923.322(d)(2), this rule
also removes both paragraphs from the handling regulations.
Comments made at the public meeting indicate that container
standardization has contributed to orderly marketing in the past. Due
to the changing dynamics in the fresh produce industry, however,
buyers--at the wholesale, retail and consumer level--are seeking many
more packaging options than have been available in the past. Handlers
report that buyers are increasingly interested in non-traditional
packaging options designed for better handling and greater consumer
acceptance. Handlers also desire greater latitude in choosing the
optimum weight for a particular type of pack. Of specific concern to
this industry is the ability to pack cherries in containers with net
weights of between 12 and 20 pounds--a weight range specifically barred
under the container regulation. Packaging options could also include
consumer-friendly ``clam shell'' containers of any desired net weight,
or other similar containers designed to enhance the appearance of
individual pieces of fruit.
Although Sec. 923.322(d)(2) provides for experimental container
exemptions, those handlers who have utilized this exemption in the past
feel that the process is too cumbersome and time-
[[Page 17981]]
consuming, thus failing to provide the optimal flexibility they need
under current marketing conditions.
Regardless of the size, capacity, or type containers the industry
may eventually use, the Committee believes that the Washington cherry
industry desires flexibility in packaging dark-colored sweet cherries.
This action will provide the industry with needed flexibility.
This rule not only removes the container regulations in Sec.
923.322(d)), but also makes necessary conforming changes by removing
Sec. 923.322(b)(2)(i) and (ii), and removing references to container
requirements in Sec. 923.322(f)(1)(ii) and Sec. 923.322(g).
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 1,500 cherry producers within the regulated
production area and approximately 53 regulated handlers. Small
agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration
(13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000,
and small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual
receipts are less than $6,000,000.
For the 2005 shipping season, the Washington Agricultural
Statistics Service has prepared a preliminary report showing that the
total 113,000 ton fresh market sweet cherry utilization sold for an
average of $2,830 per ton. Based on the number of producers in the
production area, the average producer revenue from the sale of sweet
cherries in 2005 is estimated at approximately $213,200 per year. In
addition, the Committee reports that most of the industry's 53 handlers
would have each averaged gross receipts of less than $6,000,000 from
the sale of fresh sweet cherries last season. Thus, the majority of
producers and handlers of Washington sweet cherries may be classified
as small entities.
At its February 28, 2006, meeting the Committee recommended that
the container regulations in Sec. 923.322(d) be removed from the
order's rules and regulations. Section 923.52(a)(3) of the order
specifically authorizes the establishment of container regulations.
Further, Sec. 923.53 authorizes the modification, suspension, or
termination of regulations issued pursuant to Sec. 923.52. This
relaxation in the regulations provides handlers with the ability to
meet the rapidly changing wholesale, retail, and consumer demand for
innovative product packaging, thus enhancing industry marketing
flexibility and efficiency.
The Committee anticipates that this rule will not negatively impact
small businesses. This rule removes the container requirements found
under Sec. 923.322(d) of the order's rules and regulations, and, thus,
should provide the industry with greater marketing opportunities. The
Committee believes that any additional costs this rule may have on the
industry would be associated with the development and use of new
containers. Such costs would likely be offset by new marketing
opportunities.
The Committee discussed alternatives to its recommendation to
remove the container regulations. The Committee explored the option of
leaving the container regulations intact without change. This option
was rejected as being an inadequate response to the demand for greater
flexibility in the packaging of fresh cherries. Temporary suspension of
the regulations was considered, and then discarded, as also being
inadequate for the current marketing situation.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large cherry handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry
and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to compliance with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires Government agencies in general
to provide the public the option of submitting information or
transacting business electronically to the maximum extent possible.
In addition, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this rule.
The Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the
Washington cherry industry and all interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations. Like all
Committee meetings, the February 28, 2006, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small, were able to express their
views on this issue.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on removal of the container regulations
under the Washington cherry marketing order. Any comments received will
be considered prior to finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the Committee's recommendation, and other information, it is found that
the regulation removed by this action no longer tends to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good
cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into
effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date
of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule removes the container regulations for Washington
sweet cherries for the 2006 shipping season and subsequent seasons; (2)
this rule should be in effect by May 15, 2006, the date 2006 season
shipments of the Washington sweet cherry crop are expected to begin,
and this action should apply to the entire season's shipments; (3) the
removal of the container regulations was recommended by the Committee
at a public meeting and all interested persons had an opportunity to
express their views and provide input; (4) Washington cherry handlers
are aware of this recommendation and need no additional time to comply
with the relaxed requirements; and (5) this rule provides a 60-day
comment period, and any comments received will be considered prior to
finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 923
Cherries, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 923 is amended as
follows:
[[Page 17982]]
PART 923--SWEET CHERRIES GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 923 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
Sec. 923.322 [Amended]
0
2. Section 923.322 is amended by:
0
a. Removing paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii);
0
b. Removing and reserving paragraph (d);
0
c. Removing the word ``container'' from paragraph (f)(1)(ii); and
0
d. Removing paragraph designation ``(d)'' in paragraph (g).
Dated: April 5, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 06-3419 Filed 4-6-06; 9:41 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P