Notice of Release of Planning Document for the U.S. Ocean Research Priorities Plan; Request for Public Comment, 18090-18091 [06-3396]

Download as PDF wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES 18090 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Notices conduct or sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9. Abstract: Respondents are owners or operators of beverage can surface coating facilities. These standards apply to each beverage can surface coating operation in which organic coatings are applied (exterior base coat operations, over varnish coating operations, and inside spray coating operations) that commenced construction, modification or reconstruction after November 26, 1980. Owners or operators of the affected facilities described must make initial reports when a source becomes subject to the standards, conduct and report on a performance test, demonstrate and report on continuous monitor performance, and maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility. Semiannual reports of excess emissions are required. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance; and are required, in general, of all sources subject to New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least two years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority. In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent directly to the EPA regional office. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and are identified on the form and/or instrument, if applicable. Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 43 hours per VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:48 Apr 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of beverage can surface coating facilities. Estimated Number of Respondents: 48. Frequency of Response: Initially, Semiannually, On Occasion. Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 5,134. Estimated Total Annual Cost: $515,230, which includes $0 capital/ startup costs. $100,800 annual O&M costs, and $414,430 annual labor costs. Changes in the Estimates: There is an increase of 492 hours in the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens. This increase is due to an expansion of the calculations to include managerial and clerical labor rates. The increase in O&M costs is due to an increase in equipment maintenance costs. Dated: March 29, 2006. Oscar Morales, Director, Collection Strategies Division. [FR Doc. E6–5198 Filed 4–7–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY Notice of Release of Planning Document for the U.S. Ocean Research Priorities Plan; Request for Public Comment Notice of release of planning document for the U.S. Ocean Research Priorities Plan and Request for Public Comment. ACTION: SUMMARY: This notice announces the release of the planning document for the U.S. Ocean Research Priorities Plan and Request for Public Comment by the National Science and Technology PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Council’s (NSTC) Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology (JSOST). This planning document was prepared to serve as a basis for discussion of theme priorities in the development of the Ocean Research Priorities Plan. Dates and Addresses: The planning document for the development of the U.S. Ocean Research Priorities Plan is now available for public review and can be accessed at https://ocean.ceq.gov/ about/docs/jsost_orpp_plandoc.pdf. Comments on the development of the U.S. Ocean Research Priorities Plan must be received by the National Science and Technology Council’s Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology no later than the close of business on Monday, May 15, 2006 (45 days). Address for comments: Only electronic (e-mail) comments will be accepted. Individuals who wish to provide comments should refer to the guidelines for comment submission available at https://ocean.ceq.gov/about/ sup_jsost_public_comment.html. Comments should be sent to: publiccomment@jsost.org. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information regarding this notice, please contact Shelby Walker, Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology, CCSP/USGCRP Office, 1717 Pennsylvania Ave., Suite 250, Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 419–3464. E-mail: swalker@usgcrp.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As part of the reformulation of ocean policy, the U.S. Ocean Action Plan (OAP) developed a governance structure that coordinates the tasks and goals of all of the Federal agencies involved in ocean science and management. This multitiered governance structure has the goal of advancing ocean science and use in an integrated and productive manner. To that end, the JSOST, as directed by the OAP and governed by the Committee on Ocean Policy (COP), the NSTC, and the Interagency Committee on Ocean Science and Resource Management Integration (ICOSRMI), will develop an Ocean Research Priorities Plan. The goal of the Ocean Research Priorities Plan is to formulate the priorities for ocean science and technology initiatives across the wide scope of societal interests. The Ocean Research Priorities Plan will subsequently be complemented by the Ocean Research Priorities Implementation Strategy that will define the fundamental principles for guiding actions and programs in support of the research priorities. A framework for the E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM 10APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 68 / Monday, April 10, 2006 / Notices Ocean Research Priorities Plan was developed by the JSOST and approved by the ICOSRMI in April 2005. This framework consists of: Vision; Challenges; Principles and Critical Elements; Themes; Goals; Resources; and Evaluating Performance. Central to the Ocean Research Priorities Plan was the identification of specific themes that would incorporate the scope of the use, impact, and interaction of the ocean, coasts, and Great Lakes with society. These themes were: 1. Enhancing human health. 2. Improving ecosystem health. 3. Sustaining natural resources. 4. Promoting marine operations. 5. The ocean’s role in climate change and variability. 6. Mitigating effects of natural hazards. 7. Improving quality of life. In addition, several elements cut across all of these themes and were identified as cross-cutting themes. They include: 1. Basic understanding of the ocean. 2. Research support through ocean observations and infrastructure. 3. Expanded ocean education. With the framework and the initial description of the themes as planning materials, the NSTC JSOST now seeks input and comment from all relevant communities. This planning document is intended to serve as a foundation for discussion and community input during the public comment period, and associated public workshop in Denver, Colorado on April 17–20, 2006. The expectation is that public comments will help prioritize among the shortterm and long-term opportunities available within the ocean sciences research field, which will in turn inform the development of the Ocean Research Priorities Plan. Additional information on the development of the Ocean Research Priorities Plan, the public comment period, and the public workshop is available at: https://ocean. ceq.gov/about/sup_jsost_prioritiesplan. html. M. David Hodge, Operations Manager. [FR Doc. 06–3396 Filed 4–7–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3170–W4–P wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Public Information Collections Approved by Office of Management and Budget SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has received Office VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:48 Apr 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 of Management and Budget (OMB) approval for the following public information collections pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Mock, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554, (202) 418–7234 or via the Internet at Jennifer.Mock@fcc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control No.: 3060–1021. OMB Approval Date: 11/7/2005. OMB Expiration Date: 11/30/2008. Title: Section 25.139, NGSO FSS coordination and information sharing between MVDDS licenses in the 12.2 GHz to 12.7 GHz band. Form No.: N/A. Estimated Annual Burden: 6 respondents; 36 annual burden hours; 6 hour per respondent. Needs and Uses: Section 43.21(c) requires each miscellaneous common carrier with operating revenues in excess of the indexed threshold as defined in 47 CFR 32.900 for a calendar year to file with the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau (formerly the Common Carrier Bureau) a letter showing its operating revenues for that year and the value of its total communications plant at the end of that year. The letter must be filed no later that April 1 of the following year. The information is used by FCC staff members to regulate and monitor the telephone industry and by the public to analyze the industry. The information or revenues and total plant is compiled and published in the Commission’s annual common carrier statistical publication and trends in telephone service report. OMB Control No.: 3060–1022. OMB Approval Date: 1/13/2006 OMB Expiration Date: 1/31/2009. Title: Section 101.1403, Broadcast Carriage Requirements. Form No.: N/A. Estimated Annual Burden: 214 respondents; 214 annual burden hours; 1 hour per respondent. Needs and Uses: On July 7, 2003, the FCC released a Third Report and Order in ET Docket No. 98–206, FCC 03–152, which requires Multichannel Video Distribution and Data Service (MVDDS) respondents that meet the statutory definition of Multiple Video Programming Distributor (MVPD) to comply with the broadcast carriage requirements located at 47 U.S.C. PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 18091 325(b)(1). Any MVDDS licensee that is an MVPD must obtain the prior express authority of a broadcast station before retransmitting that station’s signal, subject to the exceptions contained in section 325(b)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Additionally, the Commission decided to change from the original Component Economic Areas (CEAs) to Designated Market Areas (DMAs) to allow for advanced wireless services. OMB Control No.: 3060–1023. OMB Approval Date: 1/13/2006. OMB Expiration Date: 1/31/2009. Title: Section 101.103, Frequency Coordination Procedures. Form No.: N/A. Estimated Annual Burden: 214 respondents; 1177 total annual burden hours; (estimated time per respondent to complete letter for consent is 0.5 hours × 214 = 107 burden hours, estimated time per respondent to establish and update Internet site is 5 hours × 214 = 1070 burden hours, 107 + 1070 = 1177 total burden hours). Needs and Uses: On July 7, 2003, the FCC released a Third Report and Order in ET Docket No. 98–206, FCC 03–152, which requires Multichannel Video Distribution and Data Service (MVDDS) licensees to provide notice of intent to construct a proposed antenna to NGSO FSS licensing operating in the 12.2–12.7 GHz frequency band and to maintain an Internet Web site of all existing transmitting sites and transmitting antennas that are scheduled for operation within one year including the ‘‘in service’’ dates. Additionally, the Commission decided to change from the original Component Economic Areas (CEAs) to Designated Market Areas (DMAs) to allow for advanced wireless services. OMB Control No.: 3060–1024. Title: Section 101.1413, License Term and Renewal Expectancy; Section 101.1421, Coordination of Adjacent Area MVDDS Stations and Incumbent Public Safety POFS Stations. Form No.: N/A. Estimated Annual Burden: 214 respondents; 107 total annual burden hours; 0.5 hours per respondent. Needs and Uses: On July 7, 2003, the FCC released a Third Report and Order in ET Docket No. 98–206, FCC 03–152, which requires Multichannel Video Distribution and Data Service (MVDDS) renewal applicants to comply with the requirements to provide substantial service by the end of the ten year initial license term. Additionally, the Commission decided to change from the original Component Economic Areas (CEAs) to Designated Market Areas E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM 10APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18090-18091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3396]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY


Notice of Release of Planning Document for the U.S. Ocean 
Research Priorities Plan; Request for Public Comment

ACTION: Notice of release of planning document for the U.S. Ocean 
Research Priorities Plan and Request for Public Comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the release of the planning document for 
the U.S. Ocean Research Priorities Plan and Request for Public Comment 
by the National Science and Technology Council's (NSTC) Joint 
Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology (JSOST). This planning 
document was prepared to serve as a basis for discussion of theme 
priorities in the development of the Ocean Research Priorities Plan.
    Dates and Addresses: The planning document for the development of 
the U.S. Ocean Research Priorities Plan is now available for public 
review and can be accessed at https://ocean.ceq.gov/about/docs/jsost_
orpp_plandoc. pdf. Comments on the development of the U.S. Ocean 
Research Priorities Plan must be received by the National Science and 
Technology Council's Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology 
no later than the close of business on Monday, May 15, 2006 (45 days).
    Address for comments: Only electronic (e-mail) comments will be 
accepted. Individuals who wish to provide comments should refer to the 
guidelines for comment submission available at https://ocean.ceq.gov/
about/sup_jsost_public_comment.html. Comments should be sent to: 
public-comment@jsost.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information regarding this notice, 
please contact Shelby Walker, Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and 
Technology, CCSP/USGCRP Office, 1717 Pennsylvania Ave., Suite 250, 
Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 419-3464. E-mail: 
swalker@usgcrp.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As part of the reformulation of ocean 
policy, the U.S. Ocean Action Plan (OAP) developed a governance 
structure that coordinates the tasks and goals of all of the Federal 
agencies involved in ocean science and management. This multi-tiered 
governance structure has the goal of advancing ocean science and use in 
an integrated and productive manner. To that end, the JSOST, as 
directed by the OAP and governed by the Committee on Ocean Policy 
(COP), the NSTC, and the Interagency Committee on Ocean Science and 
Resource Management Integration (ICOSRMI), will develop an Ocean 
Research Priorities Plan. The goal of the Ocean Research Priorities 
Plan is to formulate the priorities for ocean science and technology 
initiatives across the wide scope of societal interests. The Ocean 
Research Priorities Plan will subsequently be complemented by the Ocean 
Research Priorities Implementation Strategy that will define the 
fundamental principles for guiding actions and programs in support of 
the research priorities. A framework for the

[[Page 18091]]

Ocean Research Priorities Plan was developed by the JSOST and approved 
by the ICOSRMI in April 2005. This framework consists of: Vision; 
Challenges; Principles and Critical Elements; Themes; Goals; Resources; 
and Evaluating Performance.
    Central to the Ocean Research Priorities Plan was the 
identification of specific themes that would incorporate the scope of 
the use, impact, and interaction of the ocean, coasts, and Great Lakes 
with society. These themes were:
    1. Enhancing human health.
    2. Improving ecosystem health.
    3. Sustaining natural resources.
    4. Promoting marine operations.
    5. The ocean's role in climate change and variability.
    6. Mitigating effects of natural hazards.
    7. Improving quality of life.
    In addition, several elements cut across all of these themes and 
were identified as cross-cutting themes. They include:
    1. Basic understanding of the ocean.
    2. Research support through ocean observations and infrastructure.
    3. Expanded ocean education.
    With the framework and the initial description of the themes as 
planning materials, the NSTC JSOST now seeks input and comment from all 
relevant communities. This planning document is intended to serve as a 
foundation for discussion and community input during the public comment 
period, and associated public workshop in Denver, Colorado on April 17-
20, 2006. The expectation is that public comments will help prioritize 
among the short-term and long-term opportunities available within the 
ocean sciences research field, which will in turn inform the 
development of the Ocean Research Priorities Plan. Additional 
information on the development of the Ocean Research Priorities Plan, 
the public comment period, and the public workshop is available at: 
https://ocean.ceq.gov/about/sup_jsost_prioritiesplan. html.

M. David Hodge,
Operations Manager.
[FR Doc. 06-3396 Filed 4-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3170-W4-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.