Application From the Nevada Department of Wildlife; Elko, Eureka, Lander, and Nye Counties, NV, for an Enhancement of Survival Permit, 17902-17903 [E6-5091]
Download as PDF
17902
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2006 / Notices
How Do We Determine Whether a
Species Is Endangered or Threatened?
Section 4(a)(1) of the ESA establishes
that we determine whether a species is
endangered or threatened based on one
or more of the five following factors—
(A) The present or threatened
destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range; (B)
Overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes; (C) Disease or predation; (D)
The inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms; or (E) Other natural or
manmade factors affecting its continued
existence. Section 4(a)(1) of the ESA
requires that our determination be made
on the basis of the best scientific and
commercial data available.
What Could Happen as a Result of This
Review?
If we find that there is new
information concerning Holmgren milkvetch, Kanab ambersnail, Maguire daisy,
Shivwits milk-vetch, Virgin River chub,
and woundfin indicating a change in
classification may be warranted, we may
propose a new rule that could do one of
the following—(a) Reclassify the species
from endangered to threatened
(downlist); (b) reclassify the species
from threatened to endangered (uplist);
or (c) remove the species from the List.
If we determine that a change in
classification is not warranted, then
these species will remain on the List
under their current status.
Authority
This document is published under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Dated: March 20, 2006.
Casey Stemler,
Acting Deputy Regional Director, Denver,
Colorado.
[FR Doc. E6–5087 Filed 4–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Application From the Nevada
Department of Wildlife; Elko, Eureka,
Lander, and Nye Counties, NV, for an
Enhancement of Survival Permit
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
receipt of application.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In response to an application
from the Nevada Department of Wildlife
(Applicant), the Fish and Wildlife
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:13 Apr 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
Service (we, the Service) is considering
issuance of an enhancement of survival
permit pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(A) of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA). The permit application
includes a proposed programmatic Safe
Harbor Agreement (SHA) between the
Applicant and the Service. The
proposed SHA provides for voluntary
habitat restoration, maintenance,
enhancement, or creation activities to
enhance the reintroduction and
recovery of Lahontan cutthroat trout
(Oncorhynchus clarki henshawi) within
the Humboldt River Distinct Population
Segment and the Interior Basin areas in
Nevada. The proposed duration of both
the SHA and permit is 50 years.
The Service has made a preliminary
determination that the proposed SHA
and permit application are eligible for
categorical exclusion under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA). The basis for this determination
is contained in an Environmental
Action Statement, which also is
available for public review.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by 5 p.m. on May 8, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Please address comments to
Robert D. Williams, Field Supervisor,
Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office, 1340
Financial Boulevard, Suite 234, Reno,
Nevada, facsimile number (775) 861–
6301.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Potter, Fish and Wildlife
Biologist, (see ADDRESSES), telephone
(775) 861–6300.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Document Availability
Individuals wishing copies of the
permit application, the Environmental
Action Statement, or copies of the full
text of the proposed SHA, including a
map of the proposed permit area,
references, and description of the
proposed permit area, should contact
the office and personnel listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Documents also will
be available for public inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours at this office (see ADDRESSES).
We specifically request information,
views, and opinions from the public on
the proposed Federal action of issuing a
permit, including the identification of
any aspects of the human environment
not already analyzed in our
Environmental Action Statement.
Further, we specifically solicit
information regarding the adequacy of
the SHA as measured against our permit
issuance criteria found in 50 CFR
17.22(c).
Our practice is to make comments,
including names and home addresses of
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
respondents, available for public review
during regular business hours.
Individual respondents may request that
we withhold their identity from the
administrative record. We will honor
such requests to the extent allowed by
law. Respondents wishing us to
withhold their identity (e.g., individual
name, home address and home phone
number) must state this prominently at
the beginning of their comments. We
will make all submissions from
organizations, agencies or businesses,
and from individuals identifying
themselves as representatives of officials
of such entities, available for public
inspection in their entirety.
Background
The primary objective of this
proposed SHA is to encourage voluntary
habitat restoration, maintenance or
enhancement activities to benefit
Lahontan cutthroat trout by relieving a
landowner who enters into the
provisions of a Cooperative Agreement
with the Applicant from any additional
section 9 liability under the Endangered
Species Act beyond that which exists at
the time the Cooperative Agreement is
signed and Certificate of Inclusion
issued (‘‘regulatory baseline’’). A SHA
encourages landowners to conduct
voluntary conservation activities and
assures them that they will not be
subjected to increased listed species
restrictions should their beneficial
stewardship efforts result in increased
listed species populations. Application
requirements and issuance criteria for
enhancement of survival permits and
SHAs are found in 50 CFR 17.22(c). As
long as enrolled landowners allow the
agreed-upon conservation measures to
be completed on their property and
agree to maintain their baseline
responsibilities, they may make any
other lawful use of the property during
the term of the Cooperative Agreement,
even if such use results in the take of
individual Lahontan cutthroat trout or
harm to this species’ habitat.
As proposed in the SHA, landowners
within the Humboldt River Distinct
Population Segment, as identified by the
Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Recovery
Plan, and the Interior Basin in Nevada,
may be enrolled by the Applicant under
the SHA. Landowners, as Cooperators,
would receive a Certificate of Inclusion
when they sign a Cooperative
Agreement. The Cooperative Agreement
would include: (1) A map of the
property; (2) delineation of the portion
of the property to be enrolled and its
stream mileage/feet; (3) the property’s
baseline and biological assessment
which would include a thorough stream
analysis (with photos) of the enrolled
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2006 / Notices
stream miles/feet; (4) a description of
the specific conservation measures to be
completed; and (5) the responsibilities
of the Cooperator and the Applicant.
The Applicant would provide draft
copies of the Cooperative Agreement to
the Service for an opportunity to review
and concur with the recommended
management activities and conservation
measures. The Service would have a
period of 15 business days in which to
make comments on the Cooperative
Agreement. If no comments were made
within 15 business days, the Applicant
would proceed to finalize the
Cooperative Agreement. The Applicant,
as the Permittee, would be responsible
for annual monitoring and reporting
related to implementation of the SHA
and Cooperative Agreements and
fulfillment of provisions by the
Cooperators. As specified in the
proposed SHA, the Applicant would
issue yearly reports to the Service
related to implementation of the
program.
Each Cooperative Agreement would
cover conservation activities to create,
maintain, restore, or enhance habitat for
Lahontan cutthroat trout and achieve
species’ recovery goals. These actions,
where appropriate, could include (but
are not limited to): (1) Restoration of
riparian habitat and stream form and
function; (2) control of stocking rates for
livestock (number/density of animals
per unit area); (3) repair or installation
of fences to protect existing or created
habitat from human disturbance; (4)
establishment of riparian buffers; and
(5) installation of screens on irrigation
diversions as well as facilitation of the
implementation of other objectives
recommended by the Lahontan
Cutthroat Trout Recovery Plan. The
overall goal of Cooperative Agreements
entered into under the proposed SHA is
to produce conservation measures that
are mutually beneficial to the
Cooperators and the long-term existence
of Lahontan cutthroat trout.
Based upon the probable species’
response time for Lahontan cutthroat
trout to reach a net conservation benefit,
the Service estimates it will take 5 years
of implementing the planned
conservation measures to fully reach a
net conservation benefit; some level of
benefit would likely occur within a
shorter time period. Most Cooperative
Agreements under the proposed SHA
are expected to have at least 10 years’
duration.
After maintenance of the restored/
created/enhanced Lahontan cutthroat
trout habitat on the property for the
agreed-upon term, Cooperators may
then conduct otherwise lawful activities
on their property that result in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:13 Apr 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
partial or total elimination of the habitat
improvements and the taking of
Lahontan cutthroat trout. However, the
restrictions on returning a property to
its original baseline condition include:
(1) The Cooperator must demonstrate
that baseline conditions were
maintained during the term of the
Cooperative Agreement and the
conservation measures necessary for
achieving a net conservation benefit
were carried out; (2) the Applicant and
the Service will be notified a minimum
of 30 days prior to the activity and given
the opportunity to capture, rescue, and/
or relocate any Lahontan cutthroat trout;
and (3) return to baseline conditions
must be completed within the term of
the Certificate of Inclusion issued to the
Applicant. Cooperative Agreements
could be extended if the Applicant’s
permit is renewed and that renewal
allows for such an extension.
The Service has made a preliminary
determination that approval of the
proposed SHA qualifies for a categorical
exclusion under NEPA, as provided by
the Department of Interior Manual (516
DM 2, Appendix 1 and 516 DM 6,
Appendix 1) based on the following
criteria: (1) Implementation of the SHA
would result in minor or negligible
effects on federally listed, proposed, and
candidate species and their habitats; (2)
implementation of the SHA would
result in minor or negligible effects on
other environmental values or
resources; and (3) impacts of the SHA,
considered together with the impacts of
other past, present and reasonably
foreseeable similarly situated projects,
would not result, over time, in
cumulative effects to environmental
values or resources which would be
considered significant. This is more
fully explained in our Environmental
Action Statement.
Based upon this preliminary
determination, we do not intend to
prepare further NEPA documentation.
The Service will consider public
comments in making its final
determination on whether to prepare
such additional documentation.
Decision
The Service provides this notice
pursuant to section 10(c) of the ESA and
pursuant to implementing regulations
for NEPA (40 CFR 1506.6). We will
evaluate the permit application, the
proposed SHA, and comments
submitted thereon to determine whether
the application meets the requirements
of section 10(a) of the ESA and NEPA
regulations. If the requirements are met,
the Service will sign the proposed SHA
and issue an enhancement of survival
permit under section 10(a)(1)(A) of the
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17903
ESA to the Applicant for take of the
Lahontan cutthroat trout incidental to
otherwise lawful activities of the
project. The Service will not make a
final decision until after the end of the
30-day comment period and will fully
consider all comments received during
the comment period.
Dated: March 22, 2006.
Robert D. Williams,
Field Supervisor, Nevada Fish and Wildlife
Office, Reno, Nevada.
[FR Doc. E6–5091 Filed 4–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Pueblo of Santa Ana Liquor Ordinance
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice publishes the
Pueblo of Santa Ana Liquor Ordinance.
The Ordinance regulates and controls
the possession, sale and consumption of
liquor within the Pueblo of Santa Ana
Indian Reservation. The Reservation is
located on trust land and this Ordinance
allows for possession and sale of
alcoholic beverages within the exterior
boundaries of the Pueblo of Santa Ana
Indian Reservation. This Ordinance will
increase the ability of the tribal
government to control the community’s
liquor distribution and possession, and
at the same time will provide an
important source of revenue for the
continued operation and strengthening
of the tribal government and the
delivery of tribal services.
DATES: Effective Date: This Ordinance is
effective on April 7, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Iris
A. Drew, Tribal Government Services
Officer, Southwest Regional Office, 1001
Indian School Road, NW., Albuquerque,
New Mexico 87104, Telephone: (505)
563–3530; Fax: (505) 563–3060; or
Ralph Gonzales, Office of Tribal
Services, 1951 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Mail Stop 320–SIB, Washington,
DC 20240, Telephone: (202) 513–7629.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the Act of August 15, 1953, Public
Law 83–277, 67 Stat. 586, 18 U.S.C.
1161, as interpreted by the Supreme
Court in Rice v. Rehner, 463 U.S. 713
(1983), the Secretary of the Interior shall
certify and publish in the Federal
Register notice of adopted liquor
ordinances for the purpose of regulating
liquor transactions in Indian country.
The Santa Ana Tribal Council approved
amendments to its Liquor Ordinance by
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17902-17903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-5091]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Application From the Nevada Department of Wildlife; Elko, Eureka,
Lander, and Nye Counties, NV, for an Enhancement of Survival Permit
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability and receipt of application.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In response to an application from the Nevada Department of
Wildlife (Applicant), the Fish and Wildlife Service (we, the Service)
is considering issuance of an enhancement of survival permit pursuant
to section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA). The permit application includes a proposed programmatic
Safe Harbor Agreement (SHA) between the Applicant and the Service. The
proposed SHA provides for voluntary habitat restoration, maintenance,
enhancement, or creation activities to enhance the reintroduction and
recovery of Lahontan cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki henshawi)
within the Humboldt River Distinct Population Segment and the Interior
Basin areas in Nevada. The proposed duration of both the SHA and permit
is 50 years.
The Service has made a preliminary determination that the proposed
SHA and permit application are eligible for categorical exclusion under
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The basis for
this determination is contained in an Environmental Action Statement,
which also is available for public review.
DATES: Written comments must be received by 5 p.m. on May 8, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Please address comments to Robert D. Williams, Field
Supervisor, Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office, 1340 Financial Boulevard,
Suite 234, Reno, Nevada, facsimile number (775) 861-6301.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Potter, Fish and Wildlife
Biologist, (see ADDRESSES), telephone (775) 861-6300.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Document Availability
Individuals wishing copies of the permit application, the
Environmental Action Statement, or copies of the full text of the
proposed SHA, including a map of the proposed permit area, references,
and description of the proposed permit area, should contact the office
and personnel listed in the ADDRESSES section. Documents also will be
available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business
hours at this office (see ADDRESSES).
We specifically request information, views, and opinions from the
public on the proposed Federal action of issuing a permit, including
the identification of any aspects of the human environment not already
analyzed in our Environmental Action Statement. Further, we
specifically solicit information regarding the adequacy of the SHA as
measured against our permit issuance criteria found in 50 CFR 17.22(c).
Our practice is to make comments, including names and home
addresses of respondents, available for public review during regular
business hours. Individual respondents may request that we withhold
their identity from the administrative record. We will honor such
requests to the extent allowed by law. Respondents wishing us to
withhold their identity (e.g., individual name, home address and home
phone number) must state this prominently at the beginning of their
comments. We will make all submissions from organizations, agencies or
businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as
representatives of officials of such entities, available for public
inspection in their entirety.
Background
The primary objective of this proposed SHA is to encourage
voluntary habitat restoration, maintenance or enhancement activities to
benefit Lahontan cutthroat trout by relieving a landowner who enters
into the provisions of a Cooperative Agreement with the Applicant from
any additional section 9 liability under the Endangered Species Act
beyond that which exists at the time the Cooperative Agreement is
signed and Certificate of Inclusion issued (``regulatory baseline''). A
SHA encourages landowners to conduct voluntary conservation activities
and assures them that they will not be subjected to increased listed
species restrictions should their beneficial stewardship efforts result
in increased listed species populations. Application requirements and
issuance criteria for enhancement of survival permits and SHAs are
found in 50 CFR 17.22(c). As long as enrolled landowners allow the
agreed-upon conservation measures to be completed on their property and
agree to maintain their baseline responsibilities, they may make any
other lawful use of the property during the term of the Cooperative
Agreement, even if such use results in the take of individual Lahontan
cutthroat trout or harm to this species' habitat.
As proposed in the SHA, landowners within the Humboldt River
Distinct Population Segment, as identified by the Lahontan Cutthroat
Trout Recovery Plan, and the Interior Basin in Nevada, may be enrolled
by the Applicant under the SHA. Landowners, as Cooperators, would
receive a Certificate of Inclusion when they sign a Cooperative
Agreement. The Cooperative Agreement would include: (1) A map of the
property; (2) delineation of the portion of the property to be enrolled
and its stream mileage/feet; (3) the property's baseline and biological
assessment which would include a thorough stream analysis (with photos)
of the enrolled
[[Page 17903]]
stream miles/feet; (4) a description of the specific conservation
measures to be completed; and (5) the responsibilities of the
Cooperator and the Applicant.
The Applicant would provide draft copies of the Cooperative
Agreement to the Service for an opportunity to review and concur with
the recommended management activities and conservation measures. The
Service would have a period of 15 business days in which to make
comments on the Cooperative Agreement. If no comments were made within
15 business days, the Applicant would proceed to finalize the
Cooperative Agreement. The Applicant, as the Permittee, would be
responsible for annual monitoring and reporting related to
implementation of the SHA and Cooperative Agreements and fulfillment of
provisions by the Cooperators. As specified in the proposed SHA, the
Applicant would issue yearly reports to the Service related to
implementation of the program.
Each Cooperative Agreement would cover conservation activities to
create, maintain, restore, or enhance habitat for Lahontan cutthroat
trout and achieve species' recovery goals. These actions, where
appropriate, could include (but are not limited to): (1) Restoration of
riparian habitat and stream form and function; (2) control of stocking
rates for livestock (number/density of animals per unit area); (3)
repair or installation of fences to protect existing or created habitat
from human disturbance; (4) establishment of riparian buffers; and (5)
installation of screens on irrigation diversions as well as
facilitation of the implementation of other objectives recommended by
the Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Recovery Plan. The overall goal of
Cooperative Agreements entered into under the proposed SHA is to
produce conservation measures that are mutually beneficial to the
Cooperators and the long-term existence of Lahontan cutthroat trout.
Based upon the probable species' response time for Lahontan
cutthroat trout to reach a net conservation benefit, the Service
estimates it will take 5 years of implementing the planned conservation
measures to fully reach a net conservation benefit; some level of
benefit would likely occur within a shorter time period. Most
Cooperative Agreements under the proposed SHA are expected to have at
least 10 years' duration.
After maintenance of the restored/created/enhanced Lahontan
cutthroat trout habitat on the property for the agreed-upon term,
Cooperators may then conduct otherwise lawful activities on their
property that result in the partial or total elimination of the habitat
improvements and the taking of Lahontan cutthroat trout. However, the
restrictions on returning a property to its original baseline condition
include: (1) The Cooperator must demonstrate that baseline conditions
were maintained during the term of the Cooperative Agreement and the
conservation measures necessary for achieving a net conservation
benefit were carried out; (2) the Applicant and the Service will be
notified a minimum of 30 days prior to the activity and given the
opportunity to capture, rescue, and/or relocate any Lahontan cutthroat
trout; and (3) return to baseline conditions must be completed within
the term of the Certificate of Inclusion issued to the Applicant.
Cooperative Agreements could be extended if the Applicant's permit is
renewed and that renewal allows for such an extension.
The Service has made a preliminary determination that approval of
the proposed SHA qualifies for a categorical exclusion under NEPA, as
provided by the Department of Interior Manual (516 DM 2, Appendix 1 and
516 DM 6, Appendix 1) based on the following criteria: (1)
Implementation of the SHA would result in minor or negligible effects
on federally listed, proposed, and candidate species and their
habitats; (2) implementation of the SHA would result in minor or
negligible effects on other environmental values or resources; and (3)
impacts of the SHA, considered together with the impacts of other past,
present and reasonably foreseeable similarly situated projects, would
not result, over time, in cumulative effects to environmental values or
resources which would be considered significant. This is more fully
explained in our Environmental Action Statement.
Based upon this preliminary determination, we do not intend to
prepare further NEPA documentation. The Service will consider public
comments in making its final determination on whether to prepare such
additional documentation.
Decision
The Service provides this notice pursuant to section 10(c) of the
ESA and pursuant to implementing regulations for NEPA (40 CFR 1506.6).
We will evaluate the permit application, the proposed SHA, and comments
submitted thereon to determine whether the application meets the
requirements of section 10(a) of the ESA and NEPA regulations. If the
requirements are met, the Service will sign the proposed SHA and issue
an enhancement of survival permit under section 10(a)(1)(A) of the ESA
to the Applicant for take of the Lahontan cutthroat trout incidental to
otherwise lawful activities of the project. The Service will not make a
final decision until after the end of the 30-day comment period and
will fully consider all comments received during the comment period.
Dated: March 22, 2006.
Robert D. Williams,
Field Supervisor, Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office, Reno, Nevada.
[FR Doc. E6-5091 Filed 4-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P