Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Substances Generally Recognized as Safe: Notification Procedure, 17892-17893 [E6-5088]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
17892
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2006 / Notices
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
Dated: March 31, 2006.
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–3349 Filed 4–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2005N–0457]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Substances
Generally Recognized as Safe:
Notification Procedure
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by May 8,
2006.
OMB is still experiencing
significant delays in the regular mail,
including first class and express mail,
and messenger deliveries are not being
accepted. To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: Fumie Yokota, Desk Officer
for FDA, FAX: 202–395–6974.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:13 Apr 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Management
Programs (HFA–250), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–4659.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Substances Generally Recognized as
Safe: Notification Procedure (OMB
Control Number 0910–0342)—Extension
Section 409 of the act (21 U.S.C. 348)
establishes a premarket approval
requirement for ‘‘food additives;’’
section 201(s) of the act (21 U.S.C.
321(s)) provides an exemption from the
definition of ‘‘food additive’’ and thus
from the premarket approval
requirement, for uses of substances that
are generally recognized as safe (GRAS)
by qualified experts. FDA is proposing
a voluntary procedure whereby
members of the food industry who
determine that use of a substance
satisfies the statutory exemption may
notify FDA of that determination. The
notice would include a detailed
summary of the data and information
that support the GRAS determination,
and the notifier would maintain a
record of such data and information.
FDA would make the information
describing the GRAS claim, and the
agency’s response to the notice,
available in a publicly accessible file;
the entire GRAS notice would be
publicly available consistent with the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and
other Federal disclosure statutes.
In the Federal Register of December 8,
2005 (70 FR 73009), FDA published a
60-day notice requesting public
comment on the information collection
provisions to which one comment was
received. The comment states that
obtaining the entire GRAS notification
through the provisions of FOIA is not a
practical means for interested persons to
learn about the safety of a substance.
The comment suggests that, to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected, FDA should
make publicly available a summary of
data and information that supports the
GRAS notice and also contains a
discussion of any negative or
inconsistent data.
FDA does not agree that obtaining
information through the provisions of
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FOIA is impractical for interested
persons. FDA also disagrees with the
comment’s suggestion that the agency
make publicly available in the GRAS
notification process a summary of data
and information that supports the GRAS
notice and also contains a discussion of
any negative or inconsistent data,
because such a summary would be
duplicative of information available
through FOIA procedures. This
information collection is associated
with the proposed rule entitled ‘‘Notice
of a Claim for GRAS Exemption Based
on a GRAS Determination’’ (the
proposed rule) (62 FR 18938). Proposed
§ 170.36(c)(4) describes requirements for
a detailed summary in the GRAS
notification procedures. This section
states that notifiers shall submit a
detailed summary of the basis for the
notifier’s determination that a particular
use of the notified substance is exempt
from the premarket approval
requirements of the act because such
use is GRAS. Such determination may
be based either on scientific procedures
or on common use in food. Proposed
§ 170.36(c)(4)(i)(B) and
170.36(c)(4)(ii)(B) state that this detailed
summary shall contain a comprehensive
discussion of any reports of
investigations or other information that
may appear to be inconsistent with the
GRAS determination. Proposed
§ 170.36(f)(1) states that all remaining
data and information in the GRAS
notice shall be available for public
disclosure, in accordance with the
provisions of FOIA, on the date the
notice is received. This would include
the detailed summary of the basis for
the notifier’s GRAS determination. To
the extent that the comment suggests a
change to the requirements of the
proposed rule, FDA responds that such
a request is outside the scope of the four
collection of information topics on
which the notice solicits comments and,
thus, will not be addressed in this
document. In response to the request for
comments in that proposed rule, the
commenter timely filed a similar
comment. This comment will be
considered in the development of the
final rule.
Description of Respondents:
Manufacturers of Substances Used in
Food and Feed.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
17893
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2006 / Notices
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
21 CFR Section
No. of
respondents
Annual frequency
per response
Total annual
responses
Hours per
response
Total hours
170.36
50
1
50
150
7,500
570.36
10
1
10
150
1,500
Total
1There
9,000
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
TABLE 2.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN1
21 CFR Section
No. of
recordkeepers
Annual frequency per
recordkeeping
Total annual
records
Hours per
recordkeeper
Total hours
170.36(c)(v)
50
1
50
15
750
570.36(c)(v)
10
1
10
15
150
Total
1There
900
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
The reporting requirement is for a
proposed rule that has not yet been
issued as a final rule. In developing the
proposed rule, FDA solicited input from
representatives of the food industry on
the reporting requirements, but could
not fully discuss with those
representatives the details of the
proposed notification procedure. FDA
received no comments on the agency’s
estimate of the hourly reporting
requirements, and thus has no basis to
revise that estimate at this time. In 1998,
FDA began receiving notices that were
submitted under the terms of the
proposed rule. Since it began receiving
notices, FDA has received 12 in 1998,
23 in 1999, 30 in 2000, 28 in 2001, 26
in 2002, 23 in 2003, 20 in 2004, and 22
to date in 2005, notices annually. To
date, the number of annual notices is
less than FDA’s estimate; however, the
number of annual notices could increase
when the proposed rule becomes final.
Dated: April 3, 2006.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E6–5088 Filed 4–6–06; 8:45 am]
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:13 Apr 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Cooperative Agreement to Support a
Single-Source Application—The
Critical Path Institute: Collaborative
Cardiovascular Drug Safety and
Biomarker Research Program—
ACTION; Availability of Sole Source
Cooperative Agreement; Request for
Application
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA), Office of the Commissioner (OC)
is announcing its intent to accept and
consider a single source application
(RFA–FDA–OC–2006–1) for the award
of a Cooperative Agreement to the
Critical Path Institute. FDA anticipates
providing up to $750,000 (direct and
indirect costs combined) in fiscal year
2006 to support this multiphased
research program that will include, but
will not be limited to, the development
of an infrastructure to support this
program and subsequent related studies
in cardiovascular disease and genomic/
proteomic biomarker research, as
stipulated by Congress.
Subject to the availability of Federal
funds and successful performance, an
additional 2 years of support up to
$750,000(direct and indirect costs
combined) per year may be available.
FDA will support the research
covered by this notice under the
authority of section 301 of the Public
Health Service (PHS) Act (42 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
241). FDA’s research program is
described in the Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance No. 93.103. Before
entering into cooperative agreements,
FDA carefully considers the benefits
such agreements will provide to the
public.
The cooperative agreement ensures
FDA’s continued participation in the
Collaborative Cardiovascular Drug
Safety and Biomarker Research Program,
as proposed by Congress and to be
conducted under FDA’s Critical Path
Initiative. A goal of the Critical Path
Initiative is to foster the development of
new tools to both promote drug safety
and accelerate the development of
innovative new therapies, through
appropriate collaboration with multiple
parties. This collaborative research
program is expected to be conducted in
a multiphase process, leveraging
resources and expertise from the
awardee, other collaborators, and FDA
to address public health needs involving
cardiovascular disease and biomarker
research.
II. Eligibility Information
Competition is limited because of
Congressional mandate, the mission of
the Critical Path Institute, its established
collaboration with the University of
Utah, and the combined ability of these
parties to leverage existing databases,
specimen repositories, clinical and
other technical expertise in support of
this program.
III. Application and Submission
For further information or a copy of
the complete Request for Applications
(RFA) contact Cynthia Polit, Grants
Management Officer, Division of
Contracts and Grants Management
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17892-17893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-5088]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2005N-0457]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Substances Generally
Recognized as Safe: Notification Procedure
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by May 8,
2006.
ADDRESSES: OMB is still experiencing significant delays in the regular
mail, including first class and express mail, and messenger deliveries
are not being accepted. To ensure that comments on the information
collection are received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed
to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: Fumie
Yokota, Desk Officer for FDA, FAX: 202-395-6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Management
Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Substances Generally Recognized as Safe: Notification Procedure (OMB
Control Number 0910-0342)--Extension
Section 409 of the act (21 U.S.C. 348) establishes a premarket
approval requirement for ``food additives;'' section 201(s) of the act
(21 U.S.C. 321(s)) provides an exemption from the definition of ``food
additive'' and thus from the premarket approval requirement, for uses
of substances that are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by qualified
experts. FDA is proposing a voluntary procedure whereby members of the
food industry who determine that use of a substance satisfies the
statutory exemption may notify FDA of that determination. The notice
would include a detailed summary of the data and information that
support the GRAS determination, and the notifier would maintain a
record of such data and information. FDA would make the information
describing the GRAS claim, and the agency's response to the notice,
available in a publicly accessible file; the entire GRAS notice would
be publicly available consistent with the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) and other Federal disclosure statutes.
In the Federal Register of December 8, 2005 (70 FR 73009), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the information
collection provisions to which one comment was received. The comment
states that obtaining the entire GRAS notification through the
provisions of FOIA is not a practical means for interested persons to
learn about the safety of a substance. The comment suggests that, to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected, FDA should make publicly available a summary of data and
information that supports the GRAS notice and also contains a
discussion of any negative or inconsistent data.
FDA does not agree that obtaining information through the
provisions of FOIA is impractical for interested persons. FDA also
disagrees with the comment's suggestion that the agency make publicly
available in the GRAS notification process a summary of data and
information that supports the GRAS notice and also contains a
discussion of any negative or inconsistent data, because such a summary
would be duplicative of information available through FOIA procedures.
This information collection is associated with the proposed rule
entitled ``Notice of a Claim for GRAS Exemption Based on a GRAS
Determination'' (the proposed rule) (62 FR 18938). Proposed Sec.
170.36(c)(4) describes requirements for a detailed summary in the GRAS
notification procedures. This section states that notifiers shall
submit a detailed summary of the basis for the notifier's determination
that a particular use of the notified substance is exempt from the
premarket approval requirements of the act because such use is GRAS.
Such determination may be based either on scientific procedures or on
common use in food. Proposed Sec. 170.36(c)(4)(i)(B) and
170.36(c)(4)(ii)(B) state that this detailed summary shall contain a
comprehensive discussion of any reports of investigations or other
information that may appear to be inconsistent with the GRAS
determination. Proposed Sec. 170.36(f)(1) states that all remaining
data and information in the GRAS notice shall be available for public
disclosure, in accordance with the provisions of FOIA, on the date the
notice is received. This would include the detailed summary of the
basis for the notifier's GRAS determination. To the extent that the
comment suggests a change to the requirements of the proposed rule, FDA
responds that such a request is outside the scope of the four
collection of information topics on which the notice solicits comments
and, thus, will not be addressed in this document. In response to the
request for comments in that proposed rule, the commenter timely filed
a similar comment. This comment will be considered in the development
of the final rule.
Description of Respondents: Manufacturers of Substances Used in
Food and Feed.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
[[Page 17893]]
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of Annual frequency Total annual Hours per
21 CFR Section respondents per response responses response Total hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
170.36 50 1 50 150 7,500
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
570.36 10 1 10 150 1,500
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 9,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Table 2.--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of Annual frequency per Total annual Hours per
21 CFR Section recordkeepers recordkeeping records recordkeeper Total hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
170.36(c)(v) 50 1 50 15 750
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
570.36(c)(v) 10 1 10 15 150
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 900
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
The reporting requirement is for a proposed rule that has not yet
been issued as a final rule. In developing the proposed rule, FDA
solicited input from representatives of the food industry on the
reporting requirements, but could not fully discuss with those
representatives the details of the proposed notification procedure. FDA
received no comments on the agency's estimate of the hourly reporting
requirements, and thus has no basis to revise that estimate at this
time. In 1998, FDA began receiving notices that were submitted under
the terms of the proposed rule. Since it began receiving notices, FDA
has received 12 in 1998, 23 in 1999, 30 in 2000, 28 in 2001, 26 in
2002, 23 in 2003, 20 in 2004, and 22 to date in 2005, notices annually.
To date, the number of annual notices is less than FDA's estimate;
however, the number of annual notices could increase when the proposed
rule becomes final.
Dated: April 3, 2006.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E6-5088 Filed 4-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
