Dry Tortugas National Park-Special Regulations, 17777-17786 [06-3295]
Download as PDF
17777
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
EXAMPLE 2.—‘‘PURE ENTITLEMENTS’’ REPORTING AND PAYING—Continued
Allocated
volume per
commingling
approval
(Mcf)
Property
50,000
Sales by
lessee
(Mcf)
Volume on
which royalty
paid to MMS
(entitlements)
(Mcf)
Lessee
75
25
........................
37,500
12,500
25,000
30,000
23,000
27,000
37,500
12,500
0
........................
100,000
100,000
75,000
100-percent
Federal
Unit
or
Communitization Agreement (2 lessees).
State Lease ................................................
25,000
C .................
D ..................
.....................
Totals ...................................................
100,000
.....................
before the royalty measurement point.
Under this methodology, MMS would
be made whole each month because
lessees would report and pay on their
entitled volume each month, even if a
particular lessee (lessee B in this
Reporting on a ‘‘pure entitlements’’
basis ensures that the Federal
Government is made whole with respect
to royalties but would not allow for
initial reporting and payment based on
takes if production is commingled
Entitled share
of allocated
volume
(Mcf)
Ownership
percentage
example) took no production. Therefore,
an adjustment to the entitled volume, as
discussed above for Example 1, would
not be necessary.
EXAMPLE 3.—‘‘PROPORTIONATE TAKES’’ REPORTING AND PAYING
Allocated
volume per
commingling
approval
(Mcf)
Property
12,500
12,500
37,500
12,500
25,000
20,000
0
30,000
23,000
27,000
25,000
0
28,302
21,698
0
........................
100,000
100,000
75,000
50,000
25,000
Totals ...................................................
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
100-percent
Federal
Unit
or
Communitization Agreement (2 lessees).
State Lease ................................................
A ..................
B ..................
C .................
D ..................
.....................
100,000
.....................
16:10 Apr 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
receive royalty based on the total
Federal production subject to the
commingling approval each month.
Therefore, an adjustment to the entitled
volume, as discussed above for Example
1, would not be necessary. In Example
3, lessees would have to adjust their
payments among themselves.
As explained above, in instances
where a lessee pays on ‘‘Pure
Entitlements’’ such as Example 2, or
‘‘Proportionate Takes’’ such as Example
3, the lessee may take production that
is more or less than its entitled share. In
that case, a lessee would need to value
its entitled share. The MMS believes
that the best means of valuing the
entitled share is to apply a volume
weighted average of the royalty values
to the volumes actually taken to the
entitled share volumes undertaken. The
MMS requests comments on any other
alternatives for valuing such volumes.
In addition, MMS is interested in
receiving comments on these three
examples describing alternative
methodologies. The MMS is also
interested in receiving comments on any
other alternative methodologies. If you
propose a methodology different from
those discussed above, please use our
example criteria and explain why you
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Volume on
which royalty
paid to MMS
(proportionate
takes) (Mcf)
50
50
75
25
........................
25,000
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Sales by
lessee
(Mcf)
Lessee
Federal Lease (2 lessees) .........................
This methodology would combine
takes and entitlements by requiring
lessees to report and pay on volumes
equal to the sales by the lessee divided
by the total sales for the property times
the allocated volume under the
commingling approval for the property.
Consider lessees C and D: In this
example, lessee C would report and pay
on 28,302 Mcf, even though it actually
took 30,000 Mcf, and its entitled volume
is 37,500 Mcf. The 28,302 Mcf is
computed as follows:
(30,000 Mcf/53,000 Mcf) × 50,000 Mcf
= 28,302 Mcf for lessee C, where 53,000
Mcf (total sales for the property) is the
sum of 30,000 Mcf (lessee C’s total sales)
and 23,000 Mcf (lessee D’s total sales),
and 50,000 Mcf is the allocated volume
under the commingling approval for the
property. Lessee D’s initial reporting
and payment would be computed
similarly.
Considering lessees A and B: If a
lessee took no production (lessee B in
this example), it would not have to pay
any royalty. However, a lessee (lessee A
in this example) could pay royalty on a
volume greater than either its actual
takes or its entitled share. Under this
methodology, MMS would be made
whole each month because it would
Entitled share
of allocated
volume
(Mcf)
Ownership
percentage
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
believe your methodology is the best
alternative. In addition, MMS would
like your input on how the various
methodologies would affect your
business practices, bookkeeping, etc.
Dated: March 22, 2006.
R.M. ‘‘Johnnie’’ Burton,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Land and
Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. E6–5073 Filed 4–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
RIN 1024–AD45
Dry Tortugas National Park-Special
Regulations
National Park Service, Interior.
Proposed Rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The proposed rulemaking
establishes special regulations for Dry
Tortugas National Park. The proposed
rule implements the act which
established Dry Tortugas National Park
and abolished Fort Jefferson National
E:\FR\FM\07APP1.SGM
07APP1
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
17778
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Monument. This proposed rule also
implements provisions for visitor use
and resource protection identified in the
2000 Final General Management Plan
Amendment/Environmental Impact
Statement for Dry Tortugas National
Park, and the July 27, 2001 Record of
Decision. This rulemaking complies
with legislative mandates for protection
of park resources in a unique and
predominantly pristine ecosystem, and
provides consistency with State fishing
rules. This proposed rule would: (1)
Remove obsolete regulations established
for Fort Jefferson National Monument;
(2) protect, monitor, and study the
region’s recognized importance to
fisheries habitats by limiting the area,
extent, and methods of recreational
fishing within portions of the park’s
boundaries by implementing a Research
Natural Area (RNA); (3) clarify the
authority of the superintendent to
regulate fishing, boating, and permitted
activities, specifically in established
management zones including the RNA;
and establish a permit system for
research and recreational users; (4)
strengthen protection of nationally
significant coral reef and other marine
resources by regulating vessel operation,
anchoring and human activity; (5)
provide enhanced protection for
shipwrecks consistent with state and
federal law; and (6) provide for greater
protection of water quality by restricting
discharges into the water of the park.
Definitions have also been added to
clarify terminology.
DATES: Comments must be received by
June 6, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the number RIN 1024–
AD45, by any of the following methods:
—Federal rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
—E-mail NPS at
ever_superintendent@nps.gov. Use
RIN 1024–AD45 in the subject line.
—Mail or hand delivery to:
Superintendent, Everglades National
Park, 40001 State Route 9336,
Homestead, FL 33034–6733.
—Fax to: (305) 242–7711.
—For additional information see
‘‘Public Participation’’ under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION below.
—Written or oral comments will also be
accepted during a public meeting to
be held during the 60 day comment
period. Date and location of the
meeting will be determined at a later
date and will be announced through
local press releases and the park’s
Web site at https://www.nps.gov/drto.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry
Case, Regulations Program Manager,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Apr 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
National Park Service, 1849 C Street,
NW., Room 7241, Washington, DC
20240. Phone: (202) 208–4206. E-mail:
jerry_case@nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The National Park Service (NPS) is
proposing to establish special
regulations for Dry Tortugas National
Park. The current regulations at 36 CFR
7.27 were established for Fort Jefferson
National Monument, the predecessor to
Dry Tortugas National Park. Fort
Jefferson National Monument was
established by Presidential
Proclamation No. 2112 in 1935 for the
purpose of preserving the Dry Tortugas
group of islands within the original
1845 Federal military reservation of
islands, keys and banks. In 1980,
Congress legislatively affirmed the Fort
Jefferson National Monument.
In 1992, Congress enacted Public Law
102–525 (16 U.S.C. 410xx et seq.)
abolishing the Fort Jefferson National
Monument and establishing Dry
Tortugas National Park in its place.
Congress established the park ‘‘to
preserve and protect for the education,
inspiration and enjoyment of present
and future generations nationally
significant natural, historic, scenic,
marine, and scientific values in South
Florida.’’ In addition, Congress directed
the Secretary of the Interior to manage
the park for the following specific
purposes, among others:
(1) To protect and interpret a pristine
subtropical marine ecosystem, including
an intact coral reef community.
(2) To protect populations of fish and
wildlife, including (but not limited to)
loggerhead and green sea turtles, sooty
terns, frigate birds, and numerous
migratory bird species.
(3) To protect the pristine natural
environment of the Dry Tortugas group
of islands.
(4) To protect, stabilize, restore and
interpret Fort Jefferson, an outstanding
example of nineteenth century masonry
fortification.
(5) To preserve and protect submerged
cultural resources.
(6) In a manner consistent with
paragraphs (1) through (5) to provide
opportunities for scientific research. 16
U.S.C. 410xx–1(b).
The NPS developed the FGMPA/EIS,
approved through a Record of Decision
in July 2001, to comply with its
statutory mandate to manage and
protect Dry Tortugas National Park, and
to respond to pressures from increased
visitation and over-utilization of park
resources.
As described more fully in the
FGMPA/EIS, despite the park’s remote
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
location approximately 70 miles west of
Key West, Florida, there are indications
that rapidly increasing visitor use is
negatively impacting the resources and
values that make Dry Tortugas National
Park unique. Visitation to Dry Tortugas
National Park increased 400% from
1994 through 2000, from 23,000 to
95,000 annual visitors. The resources
and infrastructure at the park cannot
sustain an uncontrolled growth rate of
this magnitude while ensuring
protection of park resources consistent
with the park’s legislative mandate.
Scientific studies have documented
significant declines in the size and
abundance of commercially and
recreationally important species of fish,
particularly snapper, grouper, and
grunts in Dry Tortugas National Park.
These declines threaten the
sustainability of reef fish communities
both within the park and throughout the
Florida Keys. Studies demonstrate that
both the size and abundance of fish in
the Tortugas area, including Dry
Tortugas National Park, are essential to
spawning and recruitment for regional
fish stocks and the multi-billion dollar
fishing and tourism industry in the
Florida Keys.
The population of south Florida is
projected to increase from its current
level of 6.3 million people to more than
12 million by 2050. With continued
technological innovations such as global
positioning systems and bigger, faster
vessels, the increase in population and
recreational tourism will likely result in
more pressure on the resources in the
Dry Tortugas. In recent years, interest
has grown in the commercial sector to
provide increased transportation to the
park and to conduct additional activities
in the park, which would bring many
more visitors and greater impacts to the
park.
To address these issues, planning was
started in 1998 to update the 1983 Fort
Jefferson National Monument General
Management Plan. Concerned that park
resources would suffer as a result of
increased use, park managers placed a
moratorium on the authorization of new
commercial activity in the park until a
FGMPA/EIS could be completed and
implemented.
The FGMPA/EIS addressed specific
issues including (1) The protection of
near-pristine resources such as coral
reefs and sea grasses (2) the
conservation of fisheries and the
protection of submerged cultural
resources (3) the management direction
of commercial services; and (4) the
determination of appropriate levels and
types of visitor use.
After extensive public involvement
and collaboration with State and
E:\FR\FM\07APP1.SGM
07APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Federal agencies, the NPS selected a
management alternative that will afford
a high level of protection to park
resources as well as provide for
appropriate types and levels of high
quality visitor experiences. This will be
accomplished by establishing
management zones and visitor carrying
capacity limits for specific locations in
the park, using commercial services to
direct and structure visitor use, and
instituting a permit system for private as
well as commercial boats in the RNA. A
range of recreational and educational
opportunities will be available for
visitors as long as appropriate resource
conditions are maintained. The quality
of visitor experiences will be enhanced
by maintaining the quality of resources
while expanding visitor access
throughout the park.
The selected management action
establishes zones that provide guidance
for managing specific areas for desired
resource conditions and visitor
experiences. These zones are set forth in
the FGMPA/EIS and Record of Decision
approved on July 27, 2001. Most of the
provisions in this proposed rulemaking
are not associated with specific
management zones but are applicable
throughout the park. The exceptions are
the provisions pertaining specifically to
the RNA and Special Protection Zones.
A brief description of these zones will
follow.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Natural/Cultural Zone
This zone will provide visitors
opportunities to experience the
remoteness and natural character of the
area. Opportunities for challenge and
adventure will be high, compared to
other zones. Facilities will generally not
be appropriate. Boaters will need to be
self-reliant. Appropriate activities will
include snorkeling, scuba diving,
swimming, boating, wildlife viewing,
and recreational fishing. Anchoring will
be permitted, however the use of
mooring buoys may be required in
certain areas if protection of sensitive
resources warrants restricting anchors.
Historic Preservation/Adaptive Use
Zone
This zone will provide interpretive,
educational and recreational
opportunities in order to convey to
visitors the rich architectural and
cultural history and natural resources of
Garden Key and Fort Jefferson.
Appropriate visitor activities will
include tours, bird-watching,
photography, swimming, snorkeling,
scuba diving, camping, boating and
recreational fishing. The management
focus in this zone will be on
maintaining and protecting historic and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Apr 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
natural resources, mitigating impacts of
human use, maintaining visitor facilities
and providing for quality visitor
experiences.
Special Protection Zone
This management zone will provide
added protection for certain sensitive
and exceptional resources. It will be
used at times and in places throughout
the park where sensitive wildlife or
cultural resources are vulnerable to
human disturbance, such as areas where
sea turtles and seabirds are nesting or
hatching. The superintendent will
establish these zones when necessary to
avoid unacceptable human impacts to
these important resources. In such
cases, only research activities will be
allowed so long as such research
activities do not impact these important
resources. The public will be notified of
any restrictions through one or more of
the methods listed in § 1.7 of this
chapter.
Research Natural Area
The RNA contains prime examples of
natural resources, processes, and
ecosystems including significant genetic
resources, which have particular value
for long-term observational studies. The
RNA is managed to provide the greatest
possible protection of resources.
Recreational fishing and consumptive
activities will not be allowed. Boaters
will be required to use mooring buoys,
and anchoring will be prohibited.
Research activities in RNAs generally
are restricted to non-manipulative
research. Education and other activities
that will not detract from an area’s
research values will be allowed. The
RNA complements the adjacent 151
square nautical mile Tortugas Ecological
Reserve in the waters of the Florida
Keys National Marine Sanctuary, which
has goals and regulations consistent
with those of the RNA, including
similar constraints on fishing.
Scientific studies have found that Dry
Tortugas National Park and the Tortugas
region play a critical role in the function
and dynamics of the larger Florida Keys
coral reef ecosystem. The Tortugas
includes spawning and nursery grounds
for numerous fish. Larvae spawned from
adult populations are spread by a
persistent system of currents and eddies
throughout the Florida Keys and up the
Southeast coast which should help
replenish depleted fish populations.
Recent scientific studies of reef
fisheries in Dry Tortugas National Park
have also documented significant
declines in the size and abundance of
fish. As such, additional fishery
management practices should be
considered to enable the National Park
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17779
Service to meet its statutory obligations
under the National Park Service Organic
Act (16 U.S.C. 1–4) and the requirement
under Public Law 102–525 (16 U.S.C.
410xx et seq.) to ‘‘protect and interpret
a pristine subtropical marine ecosystem,
including an intact coral reef
community.’’
The RNA is a useful management tool
to protect this pristine area as well as
provide sanctuaries for species that have
been substantially impacted by
harvesting or habitat reduction, and to
provide time for altered systems to
recover. The RNA complements the
adjacent Tortugas Ecological Reserve in
the waters of the Florida Keys National
Marine Sanctuary, with consistent goals
and constraints on fishing. In order for
the RNA and the Ecological Reserve to
be biologically effective, the full range
of land and marine habitats and their
associated communities must be
included in these areas. The National
Marine Sanctuary’s Tortugas Ecological
Reserve, with its deep reefs and
habitats, provides spawning areas for
recreationally and commercially
important fish while the National Park’s
RNA, with its shallow reefs and sea
grass beds, provides nurseries and food
for these fish and a multitude of other
marine species. The rationale and
benefits from establishment of the RNA
are explained in greater detail in the
ROD for the FGMPA/EIS.
The proposed regulations pertaining
to the RNA are intended to protect,
restore, and enhance the living
resources of the Park; contribute to the
maintenance of natural assemblages of
living resources for future generations;
provide places for species dependent on
such living resources to survive and
propagate; achieve the objective of
resource protection while facilitating
uses not prohibited by other authorities;
reduce conflicts between such
compatible uses; and achieve the
purposes of Public Law 102–525 (16
U.S.C. 410xx et seq.) and the National
Park Service Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1–
4) of 1916.
The RNA also responds to the
National Park Service’s statutory
authority (16 U.S.C. 5935) to provide
opportunities for scientific research.
The RNA and the larger Tortugas
Ecological Reserve constitute a rare
opportunity to cooperatively advance
the science of marine ecology and
marine resource management through
direct observation of how resources
within these areas respond to
protection. Application of the research
results in Park management programs
will implement statutory direction to
assure that resource management is
enhanced by utilization of a broad
E:\FR\FM\07APP1.SGM
07APP1
17780
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
program of the highest quality science
and information (16 U.S.C. 5932).
By designating the Research Natural
Area, the National Park Service hopes to
realize the area’s full potential and offer
outstanding opportunities for scientific
research, visitor education and
appreciation of an intact marine
ecosystem. These goals are consistent
with the objectives of Executive Order
13089 on Coral Reef Protection,
Executive Order 13151 on Marine
Protected Areas, the U.S. Coral Reef
Task Force’s March 2000 National
Action Plan To Conserve Coral Reefs,
and the 2004 U.S. Ocean Action Plan.
Section-by-Section Analysis
(a) What terms do I need to know?
In order to provide clarity and reduce
possible confusion, fifteen definitions
have been included in this paragraph.
They include: Baitfish, cast net,
designated anchorage, dip net, finfish,
flat wake, guide fishing, live rock,
lobster, marine life, not available for
immediate use, ornamental tropical fish,
permits, research natural area, and
shrimp. Common fish names referred to
in the regulations are further clarified by
including scientific names.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
(b) Are there recreational fishing
restrictions that I need to know?
Section 2.3(a) of this chapter adopts
non-conflicting state fishing laws as part
of the general NPS regulations
applicable to all units of the National
Park System unless regulations for
particular park areas specify otherwise.
For Dry Tortugas National Park, we are
proposing additional requirements
relating to fishing to achieve the park’s
purposes and implement planning
decisions. Recreational fishing activities
must comply with the state regulations
unless those activities are otherwise
restricted or prohibited in this section.
Any reference to fishing in § 7.27 refers
to recreational fishing, which is the
taking, attempting to take, or possessing
of fish for personal use. This is the same
definition used by the State of Florida.
All references to commercial fishing
have been removed since this activity is
already prohibited by 36 CFR 2.3(d)(4).
The intent of paragraph (b)(1) is to
allow the superintendent to impose
restrictions or closures to protect a fish
species within the park. In emergency
situations, after consulting with the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission, the superintendent may
impose closures and establish
conditions or restrictions necessary
pertaining to fishing, including but not
limited to species of fish that may be
taken, seasons and hours during which
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Apr 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
fishing may take place, methods of
taking, and size, bag and possession
limits. In emergency situations where
consultation in advance is not possible,
the superintendent will consult within
24-hours of the initiation of closures or
restrictions. Such emergency closures or
restrictions are temporary in nature and
may be for up to a 30-day period which
may be extended once for up to an
additional 30-day period by the
superintendent. In other situations
pertaining to fishing (i.e., nonemergency situations or the extension of
emergency closures or restrictions
beyond these two emergency periods),
the superintendent shall consult with
and obtain the concurrence of the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission prior to acting. This
provision of such closures and
restrictions is in furtherance of the
park’s enabling legislation, which
identifies protection of fish and wildlife
as a purpose of its establishment.
Paragraph (b)(2) identifies which fish
can be taken and the legal methods for
taking these fish. Fishing is limited to
fin fish caught by a closely attended
hook-and-line, bait fish caught by hookand-line, cast nets or dip nets, and
shrimp caught by dip nets or cast nets.
These restrictions are not new. For the
last 10 years, they have been enforced
through the Superintendent’s
Compendium, which serves as a local
management guide authorized by 36
CFR 1.5. Including these restrictions in
this proposed regulation increases
public awareness of their applicability.
The previous restriction in 36 CFR
7.27(a)(5)(i), that limits cast nets to 12
feet in diameter, has been removed.
There appears to be no compelling
ecological or environmental reason to
restrict the size of the cast nets. This
proposed change would bring the park’s
regulations into conformity with state
regulations.
Paragraph (b)(3) identifies areas that
are closed to fishing, including the RNA
set forth in the 2001 ROD. Note,
however, that paragraph (b)(3)(i)
includes provisions that allow vessels to
transit the RNA with legally harvested
fish and fishing gear onboard. The
provisions of paragraph (b)(3) are
similar to the regulations applicable to
the adjacent Tortugas Ecological Reserve
within the Florida Keys National Marine
Sanctuary (19 CFR 922.164; Florida
Administrative Code 68B–6.003). The
other closed areas are the waters inside
the Garden Key moat and those within
the designated swimming and
snorkeling area. Fishing in these areas
has been found to be incompatible with
the identified visitor activities of
boating, swimming and snorkeling, and
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
for safety reasons in the helicopterlanding zone.
Paragraph (b)(4) identifies specific
prohibitions on fishing within the park.
This paragraph lists certain fishing
practices that differ from state of Florida
regulations because they are
incompatible with the goals and
management direction of the Park.
Paragraph (b)(4)(i) provides for
complete protection of lobster within
the park. All existing regulations found
in 36 CFR 7.27 (a)(2) related to
recreational fishing catch limits for
lobster have been deleted. Prohibiting
individuals from being in the water,
when they have lobster onboard their
vessel will further enhance the
protection of park resources. This
‘‘prima facie’’ (at first view) evidence of
violation is similar to the state of
Florida regulations for the Biscayne
Bay/Card Sound Spiny Lobster
Sanctuary (FAC 68B–11.004), and for
John Pennecamp Coral Reef State Park
(FAC 68B–24.005). In Dry Tortugas
National Park, the harvesting of lobster
has been previously prohibited through
the use of the superintendent’s authority
to regulate public use under 36 CFR 1.5.
This prohibition was based on data
collected by NPS biologists in a 1975
study, which indicated that legal
harvesting was removing almost 90% of
the lobster within the park. The Gulf of
Mexico Fishery Management Council
concurred with this finding and
recommended that the park be
established as a sanctuary for lobster to
assist in maintaining a population for
dispersal to areas outside the park.
The proposed regulations in
paragraph (b)(4)(ii), concerning
possession and use of spearguns and
other weapons are similar to regulations
for the ecological reserves and sanctuary
preservation areas found within the
Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary
(15 CFR 922.164). The state of Florida
has similar regulations restricting
spearfishing activities found in FS
370.172. This proposed regulation
expands on the current regulation, 36
CFR 7.27(a)(7), to include guns, bows
and other similarly powered weapons.
Paragraph (b)(4)(iii) recognizes that a
gaff is a common fishing device used to
retrieve legally taken fish from the
water, while identifying other
prohibited fishing devices.
Although all natural resources within
a national park area are protected from
removal, disturbance, injury, or
destruction by the general regulations
found in 36 CFR 2.1, the provision at
paragraph (b)(4)(iv) clarifies that
ornamental tropical fish as well as all
other forms of marine life within Dry
Tortugas National Park are specifically
E:\FR\FM\07APP1.SGM
07APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
protected. This additional level of
protection will help achieve the
congressional direction to protect a
pristine subtropical marine ecosystem,
including an intact coral reef
community.
The intent of (b)(4)(v) is to protect
coral and other submerged resources
from damage or injury by prohibiting
the dragging or trawling of nets that are
otherwise allowed to be used in the
park.
Paragraph (b)(4)(vi) prohibits the use
of nets, other than dip or cast nets. The
state of Florida general recreational
fishing regulations allow other nets
(bully nets, frame and push nets, beach
or haul seines) which are inappropriate
and harmful to various submerged
resources in the park.
Current regulations pertaining to sea
turtles and conch found in 36 CFR
7.27(a)(1) and (3) have been removed as
unnecessary. The state of Florida has
prohibited the taking of conch since
1985 and the general NPS regulations
already adopt all non-conflicting state
laws. Also, 36 CFR 7.27 (b)(4)(iv) will
prohibit the taking of any ornamental
tropical fish or other marine life.
Because all sea turtles are currently
listed as endangered or threatened
species under the Endangered Species
Act (16 U.S.C. 1538), it is unnecessary
to duplicate prohibitions on their taking
in these proposed regulations.
Consistent with 36 CFR 5.3, paragraph
(b)(5) requires that all fee-for-service
guides (including guides for fishing and
diving) obtain a permit or other NPS
approved commercial use authorization.
This permit system allows the park to
better manage the fisheries and other
park resources. The superintendent may
limit the number of permitted guides
within the park in order to conserve
park resources and enhance the visitor
experience.
(c) Are there any areas of the park
closed to the public?
Yes. Paragraph (c) identifies areas that
will be closed to public access. The
Long/Bush Keys coral patch has been
identified by biologists as ‘‘fused’’
staghorn (Acropora prolifera), a very
rare hybrid of staghorn and elkhorn
corals. This coral patch is threatened by
a disease that is devastating staghorn
and elkhorn coral in Biscayne National
Park and the Florida Keys National
Marine Sanctuary. Hospital and Long
Keys have been closed for the last 10
years pursuant to the Superintendent’s
Compendium authority under 36 CFR
1.5. The largest remaining breeding
colony of frigate birds in the United
States lives on Long Key. The
threatened masked booby and other sea
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Apr 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
birds live and breed on Hospital Key.
Seasonal closures of Bush Key, East
Key, and portions of Loggerhead Key for
turtle and bird nesting will continue to
be designated through the
Superintendent’s Compendium. See 36
CFR 1.5, 1.7.
(d) Is Loggerhead Key open to the
public?
Loggerhead Key will be open to the
public subject to closures in certain
areas and restrictions on certain
activities. Loggerhead Key is the largest
key in the park and contains an
operating 150-foot lighthouse and other
structures. Most of the island falls
within the RNA; however, the center
portion, containing the lighthouse and
the other structures, falls within a
historic preservation/adaptive use zone.
Paragraph (d) is consistent with the
GMPA’s decision to manage access and
recreational activities on Loggerhead
Key. To protect the natural and cultural
resources of the island, as well as
providing appropriate visitor
experiences, the superintendent may
impose terms and conditions on
activities as necessary. The public will
be notified of any such requirements
through one or more of the methods
listed in § 1.7 of this chapter. Such
terms and conditions include, but are
not limited to: docking, hiking
restrictions, beach and swimming
access, and other restrictions or closures
necessary to conserve the natural and
cultural resources of the island.
(e) Are there restrictions that apply to
anchoring a vessel in the park?
Paragraph (e) addresses anchoring
locations in general and anchoring
prohibitions in the RNA. In the past,
boaters have commonly anchored in sea
grass beds and rubble bottom, which has
resulted in unacceptable impacts to park
resources. By restricting anchoring to
authorized locations and prohibiting
anchoring in all other areas, except in
emergencies, degradation to coral reefs
and seagrass meadows will be
significantly reduced. Paragraph (e)(1)
requires vessels to use mooring buoys.
The RNA requires a higher level of
protection of the marine ecosystem; thus
the use of anchors in this area is
prohibited.
Paragraph (e)(2) specifies where
vessels can anchor. The ‘‘designated
anchorage’’ identified in the existing 36
CFR 7.27(b) is also revised to reflect the
GMPA’s management zone which calls
for limiting anchorage of vessels from
sunset to sunrise to the historic
preservation/adaptive use zone around
Garden Key. This ‘‘designated
anchorage’’ is any sand or rubble bottom
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17781
within one nautical mile of the Fort
Jefferson Harbor Light. This area has
been identified as the designated
anchorage through the use of the
Superintendent’s Compendium for the
previous 10 years.
Paragraph (e)(4) imposes restrictions
on anchoring by commercial fishing and
shrimping vessels consistent with U.S.
Coast Guard regulations found in 33
CFR 110.190.
(f) What vessel operations are
prohibited?
This paragraph addresses several
issues of unsafe or otherwise prohibited
vessel operations. The Fort Jefferson
moat is closed to vessels to preserve and
protect the historic scene and prevent
damage to the structures. Vessel use in
the moat could damage the walls of the
fort and the integrity of the moat wall.
Because of the large volume of vessel
traffic in and around the Garden Key
and Bird Key harbors, vessels are
required to operate at a flat wake speed
to prevent injury and damage resulting
from boat wakes.
(g) What are the regulations regarding
the discharge of materials in park
waters?
Paragraph (g) provides for greater
protection of the water quality within
the park by generally prohibiting the
discharge or deposit of any material or
substance in park waters. The NPS
wishes to maintain the highest possible
water quality, free of bacterial and
chemical contamination, for health and
safety reasons as well as to maintain the
park’s environment. The NPS recognizes
that certain discharges from vessels,
such as bilge water, gray water and
engine exhaust cannot be contained and
some natural substances, such as fish
parts, would have minimal impact on
the water quality and therefore, would
be allowed. These proposed regulations
are similar to the regulations found in
the Florida Keys National Marine
Sanctuary (15 CFR 922.163). To address
future issues regarding the discharge of
materials or substances in park waters,
the superintendent may impose further
restrictions as necessary to protect park
resources, visitors, or employees. The
public will be notified of any changes
through one or more methods listed in
§ 1.7 of this chapter.
(h) What are the permit requirements in
the park?
Paragraph (h) requires that
individuals obtain a permit from the
superintendent in order to take part in
any recreational activity occurring from
a vessel within the park. By definition,
permits may be issued in writing or be
E:\FR\FM\07APP1.SGM
07APP1
17782
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
provided by oral (radio or telephone)
authorization. Permitted activities may
include anchoring, fishing, snorkeling,
diving, wildlife viewing, photography,
and the use of mooring buoys. In the
RNA, no permits will be issued for
anchoring or fishing as these are
prohibited activities. Transiting the park
by vessel without stopping to engage in
research or recreational activities in the
park shall not require a permit. All
research conducted in the park also
requires a permit. In the RNA, permits
will only be issued for nonmanipulative research (i.e., that which
does not alter the existing condition).
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
(i) How are coral and other underwater
features protected in the park?
The coral formations within the park
are internationally recognized as unique
and significant. Public Law 102–525
establishing the park requires protection
of the ‘‘pristine subtropical marine
ecosystems, including an intact coral
reef community.’’ Accordingly, this rule
proposes new provisions for the
protection of corals. Significant damage
to coral can be caused by divers or
snorkelers handling or standing on
coral, especially in areas of heavy use.
The NPS hopes to mitigate this damage
by specifically prohibiting these actions,
thereby resulting in persons being
responsible for any damage that occurs
to the coral through contact with their
body or their equipment, such as fins,
SCUBA tanks, gauges, or cameras.
Language is also included to prohibit
taking or removing corals and live rock.
These provisions are similar to special
regulations in the adjacent Florida Keys
National Marine Sanctuary (15 CFR
922.163). Coral damage caused by
vessels is often attributed to
carelessness of vessel operators but can
be avoided through more careful vessel
operation. This proposed rule would
make vessel operators responsible for
preventing damage to corals by their
vessels. This provision is similar to
regulations in the adjacent Florida Keys
National Marine Sanctuary (15 CFR
922.163).
Paragraph (i)(3) would result in vessel
operator responsibility for any damage
to coral, seagrass, or any other
underwater feature caused by their
anchors or anchor parts. This is to
prevent damage to fragile resources and
assure the highest level of resource
protection.
(j) What restrictions do I need to know
when on or near shipwrecks found in
the park?
Paragraph (j) provides specific
protection for wrecked or abandoned
craft and their cargo. Dry Tortugas
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Apr 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
National Park possesses one of the
greatest concentrations of historically
significant shipwrecks in North
America, with some dating back to the
1600’s. Within the park boundary, there
have been more than 275 historically
documented maritime casualties
(shipwrecks, groundings, strandings),
and human activity has left a significant
material record. Protection of
submerged cultural resources is a park
priority, as well as a management
purpose identified in Public Law 102–
525 (16 U.S.C. 410xx et seq.). Consistent
with the park’s statutory mandate, these
regulations would provide specific
protection for these cultural resources in
addition to protections provided by
regulations in 36 CFR 2.1, the
Antiquities Act (16 U.S.C. 431–433) and
its implementing regulations (43 CFR
part 3), the Archeological Resources
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 470aa–mm)
and its implementing regulations (43
CFR part 7), the Florida Historical
Resources Act of 1997 (F.S. chap 267
rev 1993) and its implementing
regulations (Florida Administrative
Code 1A–31).
(k) Can aircraft land in the park?
Paragraph (k) allows the
superintendent to manage aircraft
operations by requiring users to obtain
a permit to land seaplanes in the park.
Seaplanes provide transportation for a
significant number of park visitors. The
NPS’s general regulation at 36 part CFR
2.17 authorizes the superintendent to
designate, through a special regulation,
operating/landing locations within the
park. It also prohibits aircraft from
operating under power within 500 feet
of swimming beaches, boat docks or
piers unless designated through a
special regulation. In order to reach the
designated ramp for discharging
passengers, seaplanes must taxi within
500 feet of dock areas. This paragraph
will specify that a landing or takeoff
may not be made within 500 feet of
Garden Key or 500 feet of Bush Key
(when it is closed for wildlife nesting),
but taxiing is allowed when seaplane
use is permitted. The existing
regulations use a 300-yard limit for
approaches, landings and takeoffs. The
new limit of 500 feet will also bring
these regulations in line with the
general aircraft regulations provision of
500 feet.
Compliance With Other Laws
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order 12866)
(1) This rule will not have an effect of
$100 million or more on the economy.
It will not adversely affect in a material
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
way the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities.
The NPS has completed the report
‘‘Cost-Benefit Analysis: Proposed
Regulations Implementing the Final
General Management Plan Amendment/
Environmental Impact Statement for Dry
Tortugas National Park.’’ (August 15,
2005.) This document may be viewed on
the park’s Web site at: https://
www.nps.gov/drto/pphtml/
documents.html.
This conclusion is based on the fact
that the proposed regulations would not
impose significant impacts on any
business. The regulations are based on
the FGMPA/EIS or are restatements,
clarifications, and definitions of
previously established policies and
regulations resulting in no change or
effects on the economy.
(2) This rule will not create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency. Actions taken under
this rule will not interfere with other
agencies or local government plans,
policies or controls. This rule is an
agency specific rule.
(3) This rule will not materially affect
budgetary effects of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights
or obligations of their recipients. This
rule will have no effects on
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights or obligations of
their recipients. No grants or other
forms of monetary supplements are
involved.
(4) This rule does not raise novel legal
or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rulemaking will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This certification is
based on a report entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Threshold Analysis:
Proposed Regulations Implementing the
Final General Management Plan
Amendment/Environmental Impact
Statement for Dry Tortugas National
Park.’’ (January 27, 2005). This
document may be viewed on the park’s
website at: https://www.nps.gov/drto/
pphtml/documents.html.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This proposed rule:
E:\FR\FM\07APP1.SGM
07APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
a. Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule will not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local or tribal
governments or the private sector. This
rule is an agency specific rule and does
not impose any other requirements on
other agencies, governments, or the
private sector.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, the rule does not have significant
takings implications. A taking
implication assessment is not required.
No taking of personal property will
occur as a result of this rule.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, the rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
This proposed rule only applies to the
use of NPS administered lands and
waters. Both the State of Florida and the
United States claim title to submerged
lands located within the boundaries of
the park established by Congress. Rather
than addressing this issue through
potentially protracted litigation, the
State and the Department have entered
into the ‘‘Management Agreement for
Certain Submerged Lands in Monroe
County, Florida, Located within Dry
Tortugas National Park’’ approved by
the Florida Governor and Cabinet on
August 9, 2005 and by the Secretary of
the Interior on December 20, 2005. This
document may be viewed on the park’s
Web site at https://nps.gov/drto/pphtml/
documents.html. The proposed
regulations are consistent with the
requirements of the Management
Agreement. Once final, the regulations
shall be reviewed at least every five
years, and as appropriate, revised, and
reissued, based upon the results of the
research program conducted pursuant to
the Management Agreement as well as
the information contained in the
management plan status report prepared
by the National Park Service detailing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Apr 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
the status and activities of the
implementation of the FGMPA/EIS.
Information and data collected
regarding the effectiveness and
performance of the RNA will also be
reviewed and evaluated. Under adaptive
management, NPS may consider
changes in the RNA, including
boundary adjustments and
modifications to the protection and
conservation management strategies
applicable to the RNA.
Consistent with the Management
Agreement, the National Park Service
will obtain the concurrence of the Board
of Trustees of the Internal Improvement
Trust Fund regarding that portion of the
regulations pertaining to the
management of submerged lands within
the park. Further, consistent with the
Management Agreement, the National
Park Service shall submit for review to
the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission proposed
regulations as well as any proposed
revisions or amendments thereto.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
In accordance with Executive Order
12988, the Office of the Solicitor has
determined that this rule does not
unduly burden the judicial system and
meets the requirements of sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This regulation does not require an
information collection from 10 or more
parties and a submission under the
Paperwork Reduction Act is not
required. An OMB Form 83–I is not
required.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Department of the Interior,
National Park Service (NPS) has
prepared a Final General Management
Plan Amendment/Environmental
Impact Statement (FGMPA/EIS) for Dry
Tortugas National Park, Monroe County,
Florida. Five alternatives were
evaluated for guiding the management
of the park over the next 15 to 20 years.
The alternatives incorporate various
zoning applications and other
management provisions to ensure
resource protection and quality visitor
experience conditions. The
environmental consequences
anticipated from implementation of
each alternative are addressed in the
FGMPA/EIS. Impacts to natural and
cultural resources, visitor experience,
socioeconomic environment, and park
operations/facilities are analyzed. The
FGMPA/EIS was prepared in
conjunction with planning by the
Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17783
(FKNMS or sanctuary), the Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission
(FFWCC) and the Gulf of Mexico
Fishery Management Council (GMFMC)
to establish a Tortugas Ecological
Reserve (TER) in State and Federal
waters adjacent to Dry Tortugas
National Park. State and Federal
approvals for the TER are complete and
implementation of the ecological reserve
is underway.
After careful consideration of
legislative mandates, visitation trends,
environmental impacts, relevant
scientific studies, and comments from
the public and agencies, the National
Park Service will implement Alternative
C as described in the Final GMPA/EIS
issued in January 2001 (with some
minor clarifications, as listed in
Appendix A, Errata). This alternative
best accomplishes the legislated
purposes of Dry Tortugas National Park
and the statutory mission of the
National Park Service to provide longterm protection of park resources and
values while allowing for visitor use
and enjoyment. It also furthers the
objectives of Executive Order 13089,
Coral Reef Protection.
The goal of the selected action is to
afford a high level of protection to park
resources and provide for appropriate
types and levels of high quality visitor
experiences. This will be accomplished
through management zoning,
establishing visitor carrying capacity for
specific locations in the park, using
commercial services to direct and
structure visitor use, and instituting a
permit system for private boaters. A
wide range of recreational and
educational opportunities will be
available to visitors provided that
appropriate resource conditions are
maintained. Visitor experiences will be
enhanced due to expanded access
throughout the park and higher quality
resources to enjoy.
Several consultations took place with
government agencies during the EIS
process, including the Florida Keys
National Marine Sanctuary, the Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission, and the Gulf of Mexico
Fishery Management Council. Pursuant
to section 7 requirements of the
Endangered Species Act, the NPS is
consulting with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service and the National
Marine Fisheries Service regarding
potential effects of the proposed
regulations on federally listed species.
The NPS Southeast Regional Director
signed the Record of Decision (ROD) on
July 27, 2001. In reaching a decision,
NPS carefully considered the comments
and concerns expressed by the public
throughout the EIS process. The EIS and
E:\FR\FM\07APP1.SGM
07APP1
17784
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
ROD are available online at: https://
www.nps.gov/drto/pphtml/
documents.html or at Everglades
National Park, as indicated above under
the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
The National Park Service has also
carefully reviewed available information
regarding current environmental
conditions at Dry Tortugas National
Park and environmental effects of the
selected action. Based on this review,
the National Park Service has found no
significant new circumstances or
information relevant to environmental
concerns and bearing on the selected
action or its impacts. Therefore, the
National Park Service has concluded
that supplementation of the 2001
Environmental Impact Statement is
unnecessary.
Government-to-Government
Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
‘‘Government to Government Relations
with Native American Tribal
Governments’’ (59 FR 22951) and 512
DM 2, we have evaluated potential
effects on federally recognized Indian
tribes and have determined that there
are no potential effects.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Clarity of Rule
Executive Order 12866 requires each
agency to write regulations that are easy
to understand. We invite your
comments on how to make this rule
easier to understand, including answers
to questions such as the following: (1)
Are the requirements in the rule clearly
stated? (2) Does the rule contain
technical language or jargon that
interferes with its clarity? (3) Does the
format of the rule (grouping and order
of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce its
clarity? (4) Would the rule be easier to
read if it were divided into more (but
shorter) sections? (A ‘‘section’’ appears
in bold type and is preceded by the
symbol ‘‘§’’ and a numbered heading;
for example § 7.27, Dry Tortugas
National Park.) (5) Is the description of
the rule in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of the preamble
helpful in understanding the proposed
rule? What else could we do to make the
rule easier to understand?
Send a copy of any comments that
concern how we could make this rule
easier to understand to: Office of
Regulatory Affairs, Department of the
Interior, Room 7229, 1849 C Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20240. You may
also e-mail the comments to this
address: Exsec@ios.doi.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Apr 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
Drafting Information
The primary authors of this regulation
are: Bonnie Foist, Lynda Lancaster, Bob
Howard, Bill Wright, Brien Culhane,
and Elaine Hall of Everglades National
Park, Don Jodrey, Department of the
Interior Office of the Solicitor, and Cliff
McCreedy, National Park Service,
Natural Resource Stewardship and
Science and Jerry Case, Regulations
Program Manager, NPS, Washington,
DC.
Public Participation
If you wish to comment, you may
submit your comments by any one of
several methods. You may mail or hand
deliver comments to Superintendent,
Everglades National Park, 40001 State
Route 9336, Homestead, FL 33034–6733
or fax to (305) 242–7711. Comments
may also be submitted on the Federal
rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Please identify comments by: RIN 1024–
AD45 or sent by e-mail to ever_
superintendent@nps.gov. Use RIN 1024–
AD45 in the subject line.
Written or oral comments will also be
accepted during a public meeting to be
held during the 60-day comment period.
Date and location of the meeting will be
determined at a later date and will be
announced through local press releases
and the park’s Web site at https://
www.nps.gov/drto.
Our practice is to make comments,
including names and addresses of
respondents, available for public review
during regular business hours.
Individual respondents may request that
we withhold their home address from
the rulemaking record, which we will
honor to the extent allowable by law. If
you wish us to withhold your name
and/or address, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comment. However, we will not
consider anonymous comments. We
will make all submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials or
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
District of Columbia, National Parks,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
National Park Service proposes to
amend 36 CFR part 7 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PART 7—SPECIAL REGULATIONS,
AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK
SYSTEM
1. The authority for part 7 continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 460(q),
462(k); Sec. 7.96 also issued under D.C. Code
8–137 (1981) and D.C. Code 40–721 (1981).
2. § 7.27 is revised to read as follows:
§ 7.27
Dry Tortugas National Park
(a) What terms do I need to know? The
following terms apply to this section
only:
Baitfish means: ballyhoo (family
Exocoetidae and genus Hemiramphus),
other genus may be included in this
family; minnow (families
Cyprinodontidae, Peciliidae, or
Aherinidae); mojarra (family Gerreidae);
mullet (family Mugilidae); pilchard
(family Clupeidae); pinfish (family
Sparidae, genus Lagodon).
Cast net means a type of circular
falling net, weighted on its periphery,
which is thrown and retrieved by hand,
measuring 14 feet or less stretched
length (stretched length is defined as the
distance from the horn at the center of
the net with the net gathered and pulled
taut, to the lead line).
Designated anchorage means any area
of sand or rubble bottom within one
nautical mile of the Fort Jefferson
Harbor Light.
Dip net means a hand held device for
obtaining bait, the netting of which is
fastened in a frame. A dip net may not
exceed three (3) feet at its widest point.
Finfish means a member of subclasses
Agnatha, Chondrichthyes, or
Osteichthyes.
Flat wake speed means the minimum
required speed to leave a flat wave
disturbance close astern a moving vessel
yet maintain steerageway, but in no case
in excess of 5 statute miles per hour.
Guide operations means the activity,
of a person, partnership, firm,
corporation, or other entity to provide
services for hire to visitors of the park.
This includes but is not limited to
fishing, diving, snorkeling, and wildlife
viewing.
Live rock means any living marine
organism or assemblage thereof attached
to a hard substrate,including dead coral
or rock but not individual mollusk
shells.
Lobster means Shovelnosed or
Spanish Lobster (Scyllarides
aequinoactialis), Slipper lobster
(Parribacus antarcticus), Caribbean
spiny lobster (Panulirus argus), or
spotted spiny lobster (Panulirus
guttatus).
Marine life means sponges, sea
anenomes, corals, jellyfish, sea
E:\FR\FM\07APP1.SGM
07APP1
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
cucumbers, starfish, sea urchins,
octopus, crabs, shrimp, barnacles,
worms, conch, and other animals
belonging to the Phyla Porifera,
Cnidaria, Echinodermata, Mollusca,
Bryozoa, Brachiopoda, rthropoda,
Platyhilmenthes, and Annelida.
Not available for immediate use
means not readily accessible for
immediate use, e.g., by being stowed
unbaited in a cabin, locker or similar
storage area, or being securely covered
and lashed to a deck or bulkhead, or in
a rod holder with hooks and lures
removed.
Ornamental tropical fish usually
means a brightly colored fish, often used
for aquarium purposes and which lives
in close relationship to coral
communities, belonging to the families
Syngathidae, Apogonidae,
Pomacentridae, Scaridae, Blennidae,
Callionymidae, Gobiidae, Ostraciidae, or
Diodontidae.
Permit, in the case of 36 CFR Part
7.27, means an authorization in writing
or orally (e.g., via radio or
telephonically).
Research Natural Area (RNA) at Dry
Tortugas means the 46-square-statutemile area in the northwest portion of the
park enclosed by connecting with
straight lines the adjacent points of
82°51′ W and 24°36′ N, and 82°58′ W
and 24°36′ N west to the park boundary,
but excluding: (1) The approximately 3square nautical mile adaptive use zone
designated by the superintendent with
notice to the public through one or more
methods listed in § 1.7 of this chapter;
(2) the designated anchorage; (3) Garden
Key, Bush Key and Long Key; or (4) the
central portion of Loggerhead key
including the lighthouse and associated
buildings.
Shrimp means a member of the genus
Farfantepenaeus, Penaeus sp.
(b) Are there recreational fishing
restrictions that I need to know? (1)
After consulting with and obtaining the
concurrence of the Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission,
based on management objectives and
the park fisheries research, the
superintendent may impose closures
and establish conditions or restrictions
necessary pertaining to fishing,
including but not limited to species of
fish that may be taken, seasons and
hours during which fishing may take
place, methods of taking, and size, bag
and possession limits. The public will
be notified of any changes through one
or more methods listed in § 1.7 of this
chapter. In emergency situations, after
consulting with the Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission, the
superintendent may impose temporary
closures and establish conditions or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Apr 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
restrictions necessary, but not exceeding
30 days in duration which may be
extended for one additional 30 day
period, pertaining to fishing, including
but not limited to species of fish that
may be taken, seasons and hours during
which fishing may take place, methods
of taking, and size, bag and possession
limits. In emergency situations where
consultation in advance is not possible,
the superintendent will consult with the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission within 24-hours of the
initiation of the temporary closure or
restriction.
(2) Only the following may be legally
taken from Dry Tortugas National Park:
(i) Fin fish by closely attended hookand-line;
(ii) Baitfish by closely attended hook
and line, dip net, or cast net and limited
to 5 gallons per vessel per day;
(iii) Shrimp may be taken by dip net
or cast net.
(3) The following waters and areas are
closed to fishing:
(i) The Research Natural Area (RNA).
Fish and fishing gear may be possessed
aboard a vessel in the RNA, provided
such fish can be shown not to have been
harvested from within, removed from,
or taken within, the RNA as applicable,
by being stowed in a cabin, locker, or
similar storage area prior to entering and
during transit through the RNA,
provided further that such vessel is in
continuous transit through the RNA.
Gear capable of harvesting fish may be
aboard a vessel in the RNA, provided
such gear is not available for immediate
use when entering and during transit
through the RNA and no presumption of
fishing activity shall be drawn
therefrom.
(ii) Garden Key moat;
(iii) Within any swimming and
snorkeling areas designated by buoys;
(iv) Within 50 feet of the historic
coaling docks;
(v) Helipad areas, including the
gasoline refueling dock.
(4) The following are prohibited:
(i) The possession of lobster within
the boundaries of the park; unless the
individual took the lobster outside park
waters and has the proper State/Federal
licenses and permits. Vessels with
legally taken lobster aboard which was
taken outside the park may not have
persons overboard in park waters. The
presence of lobster aboard a vessel in
park waters, while one or more persons
from such vessel are overboard, shall
constitute prima facie evidence that
such lobsters were harvested from park
waters in violation of this chapter.
(ii) The taking of fish by pole spear,
Hawaiian sling, rubber powered,
pneumatic, or spring loaded gun or
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17785
similar device known as a speargun, air
rifles, bows and arrows, powerheads, or
explosive powered guns. Operators of
vessels within the park must break
down and store all described weapons
so such gear is not available for
immediate use.
(iii) The use of a hand held hook, gig,
gaff, or snare is prohibited, except that
a gaff may be used for landing a fish
lawfully caught by hook and line when
consistent with all requirements
provided herein including size and
species restrictions.
(iv) The taking, possession or
touching of any ornamental tropical fish
or marine life except as expressly
provided in this section.
(v) Dragging or trawling a dip net or
cast net.
(vi) The use of nets except as
provided in (b)(2)(ii) and (iii).
(5) Engaging in guide operations (fee
for service), including but not limited to
fishing and diving, except in accordance
with the provisions of a permit,
contract, or other commercial use
authorization, or other written
agreement with the United States and
administered under this chapter is
prohibited.
(c) Are there any areas of the park
closed to the public? Yes. The following
areas are closed to the public:
(1) The elkhorn (Acropora palmata)
and staghorn (Acropora prolifera)
patches adjacent to and including the
tidal channel southeast of Long and
Bush Keys and extending to 100 yards
from the exterior edge of either patch.
(2) Hospital and Long Keys.
(3) Areas designated by the
superintendent in accordance with § 1.5
and noticed to the public through one
or more of the methods listed in § 1.7 of
this chapter.
(d) Is Loggerhead Key open to the
public? The superintendent shall
designate areas on Loggerhead Key as
closed for public use, establish closures
or restrictions on and around the waters
of Loggerhead Key, and establish
conditions for docking, swimming or
wading, and hiking as necessary to
protect park resources, visitors, or
employees. The public will be notified
of any such designations, closures or
restrictions through one or more
methods listed in § 1.7 of this chapter.
(e) Are there restrictions that apply to
anchoring a vessel in the park? (1)
Anchoring in the Research Natural Area
(RNA) is prohibited.
(2) All vessels in the RNA must use
designated mooring buoys.
(3) Anchoring between sunset and
sunrise is limited to the designated
anchorage area at Garden Key.
E:\FR\FM\07APP1.SGM
07APP1
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
17786
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 67 / Friday, April 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(4) Except in cases of emergency
involving danger to life or property, no
vessel engaged in commercial fishing or
shrimping shall anchor in any of the
channels, harbors or lagoons in the
vicinity of Garden Key, Bush Key, or the
surrounding shoals outside of Bird Key
Harbor. Emergencies may include, but
are not limited to, adverse weather
conditions, mechanical failure, medical
emergencies or other public safety
situations.
(f) What vessel operations are
prohibited? The following vessel
operations are prohibited:
(1) Operating a vessel in the Fort
Jefferson Moat;
(2) Operating a vessel above a flat
wake speed in the Garden Key and Bird
Key Harbor areas.
(g) What are the regulations regarding
the discharge of materials in park
waters? (1) The discharge or deposit of
materials or substances of any kind
within the boundaries of the park is
prohibited, except for the following:
(i) Fish, fish parts, chumming
material, or bait used or produced
incidental to and while conducting
recreational fishing activities;
(ii) Graywater from sinks, consisting
of only water and food particles;
(iii) Vessel cooling water, engine
exhaust, or bilge water when not
contaminated by oil or other substances.
(2) The superintendent may impose
further restrictions as necessary to
protect park resources, visitors, or
employees. The public will be notified
of any such requirements through one or
more methods listed in § 1.7 of this
chapter.
(h) What are the permit requirements
in the park? (1) A permit, issued by the
superintendent, is required for all noncommercial vessels for which occupants
are engaged in recreational activities,
including all activities in the RNA.
Permitted recreational activities include
but are not limited to use of mooring
buoys, snorkeling, diving, wildlife
viewing, and photography.
(2) A permit, issued by the
superintendent, is required for a person,
group, institution, or organization
conducting research activities in the
park.
(3) Vessels transiting the park without
interruption shall not require a permit.
(i) How are corals and other
underwater natural features protected in
the park? (1) Taking, possessing,
removing, damaging, touching,
handling, harvesting, disturbing,
standing on, or otherwise injuring coral,
coral formation, seagrass or other living
or dead organisms, including marine
invertebrates, live rock, and shells, is
prohibited.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Apr 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
(2) Vessel operators are prohibited
from allowing their vessel to strike,
injure, or damage coral, seagrass, or any
other immobile organism attached to the
seabed.
(3) Vessel operators are prohibited
from allowing an anchor, chain, rope or
other mooring device to be cast,
dragged, or placed so as to strike, break,
abrade, or otherwise cause damage to
coral formations, sea grass, or
submerged cultural resources.
(j) What restrictions do I need to know
when on or near shipwrecks found in
the park? No person may destroy,
molest, remove, deface, displace, or
tamper with wrecked or abandoned
vessels of any type or condition, or any
cargo pertaining thereto; and, the
survey, inventory, dismantling, or
recovery of any such wreck or cargo
within the boundaries of the park is
prohibited unless permitted in writing
by the superintendent.
(k) How are aircraft operations
restricted in the park? (1) Landing an
aircraft in Dry Tortugas National Park
may occur only in accordance with a
permit issued by the superintendent
pursuant to § 1.6 of this chapter.
(2) When landing is authorized by
permit, the following requirements also
apply:
(i) Aircraft may be landed on the
waters within a radius of 1 mile of
Garden Key, but a landing or takeoff
may not be made within 500 feet of
Garden Key, or within 500 feet of Bush
Key when Bush Key is closed to the
public to protect nesting wildlife. The
operation of aircraft is also subject to
§ 2.17, except that seaplanes may be
taxied closer than 500 feet to the Garden
Dock while enroute to or from the
designated ramp, north of the dock.
(ii) Seaplanes may be moored or
brought up on land only on the
designated beach, north of the Garden
Key dock.
Matthew J. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 06–3295 Filed 4–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–70–P
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 90
[WT Docket No. 96–86; FCC 06–34]
Development of Operational, Technical
and Spectrum Requirements for
Meeting Federal, State and Local
Public Safety Communication
Requirements Through the Year 2010
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In the Eighth Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (Eighth NPRM),
the FCC seeks comment on proposals to
create broadband channels in the 700
MHz public safety band. Specifically,
the Eighth NPRM seeks comment on
proposals to accommodate broadband
and/or wideband operations on the
current wideband spectrum (twelve
megahertz) of the current 700 MHz
public safety spectrum allocation. This
Eighth NPRM is another step in the
FCC’s ongoing efforts to develop a
regulatory framework in which to meet
current and future public safety
communications needs.
DATES: Written comments are due on or
before June 6, 2006, and reply
comments are due on or before July 6,
2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by WT Docket 96–86 and FCC
06–34, by any of the identified methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission Web Site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: ecfs@fcc.gov. Include WT
Docket No. 96–86 in the subject line of
the message.
• Mail: Paper submissions.
• (Hand or Messenger Delivered
accepted between 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. only)
Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission, Office of
the Secretary, c/o Natek, Inc., Inc., 236
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110,
Washington, DC 20002.
• (Commercial overnight mail,
EXCEPT United States Postal Service)
Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission, Office of
the Secretary, 9300 East Hampton Drive,
Capitol Heights, MD 20743,
• (All other mail, including United
States Postal Service Express Mail,
Priority Mail, and First Class Mail)
Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission, Office of
E:\FR\FM\07APP1.SGM
07APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 67 (Friday, April 7, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17777-17786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3295]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
RIN 1024-AD45
Dry Tortugas National Park-Special Regulations
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed Rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The proposed rulemaking establishes special regulations for
Dry Tortugas National Park. The proposed rule implements the act which
established Dry Tortugas National Park and abolished Fort Jefferson
National
[[Page 17778]]
Monument. This proposed rule also implements provisions for visitor use
and resource protection identified in the 2000 Final General Management
Plan Amendment/Environmental Impact Statement for Dry Tortugas National
Park, and the July 27, 2001 Record of Decision. This rulemaking
complies with legislative mandates for protection of park resources in
a unique and predominantly pristine ecosystem, and provides consistency
with State fishing rules. This proposed rule would: (1) Remove obsolete
regulations established for Fort Jefferson National Monument; (2)
protect, monitor, and study the region's recognized importance to
fisheries habitats by limiting the area, extent, and methods of
recreational fishing within portions of the park's boundaries by
implementing a Research Natural Area (RNA); (3) clarify the authority
of the superintendent to regulate fishing, boating, and permitted
activities, specifically in established management zones including the
RNA; and establish a permit system for research and recreational users;
(4) strengthen protection of nationally significant coral reef and
other marine resources by regulating vessel operation, anchoring and
human activity; (5) provide enhanced protection for shipwrecks
consistent with state and federal law; and (6) provide for greater
protection of water quality by restricting discharges into the water of
the park. Definitions have also been added to clarify terminology.
DATES: Comments must be received by June 6, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by the number RIN 1024-
AD45, by any of the following methods:
--Federal rulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
--E-mail NPS at ever_superintendent@nps.gov. Use RIN 1024-AD45 in the
subject line.
--Mail or hand delivery to: Superintendent, Everglades National Park,
40001 State Route 9336, Homestead, FL 33034-6733.
--Fax to: (305) 242-7711.
--For additional information see ``Public Participation'' under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION below.
--Written or oral comments will also be accepted during a public
meeting to be held during the 60 day comment period. Date and location
of the meeting will be determined at a later date and will be announced
through local press releases and the park's Web site at https://
www.nps.gov/drto.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry Case, Regulations Program
Manager, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW., Room 7241,
Washington, DC 20240. Phone: (202) 208-4206. E-mail: jerry_
case@nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The National Park Service (NPS) is proposing to establish special
regulations for Dry Tortugas National Park. The current regulations at
36 CFR 7.27 were established for Fort Jefferson National Monument, the
predecessor to Dry Tortugas National Park. Fort Jefferson National
Monument was established by Presidential Proclamation No. 2112 in 1935
for the purpose of preserving the Dry Tortugas group of islands within
the original 1845 Federal military reservation of islands, keys and
banks. In 1980, Congress legislatively affirmed the Fort Jefferson
National Monument.
In 1992, Congress enacted Public Law 102-525 (16 U.S.C. 410xx et
seq.) abolishing the Fort Jefferson National Monument and establishing
Dry Tortugas National Park in its place. Congress established the park
``to preserve and protect for the education, inspiration and enjoyment
of present and future generations nationally significant natural,
historic, scenic, marine, and scientific values in South Florida.'' In
addition, Congress directed the Secretary of the Interior to manage the
park for the following specific purposes, among others:
(1) To protect and interpret a pristine subtropical marine
ecosystem, including an intact coral reef community.
(2) To protect populations of fish and wildlife, including (but not
limited to) loggerhead and green sea turtles, sooty terns, frigate
birds, and numerous migratory bird species.
(3) To protect the pristine natural environment of the Dry Tortugas
group of islands.
(4) To protect, stabilize, restore and interpret Fort Jefferson, an
outstanding example of nineteenth century masonry fortification.
(5) To preserve and protect submerged cultural resources.
(6) In a manner consistent with paragraphs (1) through (5) to
provide opportunities for scientific research. 16 U.S.C. 410xx-1(b).
The NPS developed the FGMPA/EIS, approved through a Record of
Decision in July 2001, to comply with its statutory mandate to manage
and protect Dry Tortugas National Park, and to respond to pressures
from increased visitation and over-utilization of park resources.
As described more fully in the FGMPA/EIS, despite the park's remote
location approximately 70 miles west of Key West, Florida, there are
indications that rapidly increasing visitor use is negatively impacting
the resources and values that make Dry Tortugas National Park unique.
Visitation to Dry Tortugas National Park increased 400% from 1994
through 2000, from 23,000 to 95,000 annual visitors. The resources and
infrastructure at the park cannot sustain an uncontrolled growth rate
of this magnitude while ensuring protection of park resources
consistent with the park's legislative mandate.
Scientific studies have documented significant declines in the size
and abundance of commercially and recreationally important species of
fish, particularly snapper, grouper, and grunts in Dry Tortugas
National Park. These declines threaten the sustainability of reef fish
communities both within the park and throughout the Florida Keys.
Studies demonstrate that both the size and abundance of fish in the
Tortugas area, including Dry Tortugas National Park, are essential to
spawning and recruitment for regional fish stocks and the multi-billion
dollar fishing and tourism industry in the Florida Keys.
The population of south Florida is projected to increase from its
current level of 6.3 million people to more than 12 million by 2050.
With continued technological innovations such as global positioning
systems and bigger, faster vessels, the increase in population and
recreational tourism will likely result in more pressure on the
resources in the Dry Tortugas. In recent years, interest has grown in
the commercial sector to provide increased transportation to the park
and to conduct additional activities in the park, which would bring
many more visitors and greater impacts to the park.
To address these issues, planning was started in 1998 to update the
1983 Fort Jefferson National Monument General Management Plan.
Concerned that park resources would suffer as a result of increased
use, park managers placed a moratorium on the authorization of new
commercial activity in the park until a FGMPA/EIS could be completed
and implemented.
The FGMPA/EIS addressed specific issues including (1) The
protection of near-pristine resources such as coral reefs and sea
grasses (2) the conservation of fisheries and the protection of
submerged cultural resources (3) the management direction of commercial
services; and (4) the determination of appropriate levels and types of
visitor use.
After extensive public involvement and collaboration with State and
[[Page 17779]]
Federal agencies, the NPS selected a management alternative that will
afford a high level of protection to park resources as well as provide
for appropriate types and levels of high quality visitor experiences.
This will be accomplished by establishing management zones and visitor
carrying capacity limits for specific locations in the park, using
commercial services to direct and structure visitor use, and
instituting a permit system for private as well as commercial boats in
the RNA. A range of recreational and educational opportunities will be
available for visitors as long as appropriate resource conditions are
maintained. The quality of visitor experiences will be enhanced by
maintaining the quality of resources while expanding visitor access
throughout the park.
The selected management action establishes zones that provide
guidance for managing specific areas for desired resource conditions
and visitor experiences. These zones are set forth in the FGMPA/EIS and
Record of Decision approved on July 27, 2001. Most of the provisions in
this proposed rulemaking are not associated with specific management
zones but are applicable throughout the park. The exceptions are the
provisions pertaining specifically to the RNA and Special Protection
Zones. A brief description of these zones will follow.
Natural/Cultural Zone
This zone will provide visitors opportunities to experience the
remoteness and natural character of the area. Opportunities for
challenge and adventure will be high, compared to other zones.
Facilities will generally not be appropriate. Boaters will need to be
self-reliant. Appropriate activities will include snorkeling, scuba
diving, swimming, boating, wildlife viewing, and recreational fishing.
Anchoring will be permitted, however the use of mooring buoys may be
required in certain areas if protection of sensitive resources warrants
restricting anchors.
Historic Preservation/Adaptive Use Zone
This zone will provide interpretive, educational and recreational
opportunities in order to convey to visitors the rich architectural and
cultural history and natural resources of Garden Key and Fort
Jefferson. Appropriate visitor activities will include tours, bird-
watching, photography, swimming, snorkeling, scuba diving, camping,
boating and recreational fishing. The management focus in this zone
will be on maintaining and protecting historic and natural resources,
mitigating impacts of human use, maintaining visitor facilities and
providing for quality visitor experiences.
Special Protection Zone
This management zone will provide added protection for certain
sensitive and exceptional resources. It will be used at times and in
places throughout the park where sensitive wildlife or cultural
resources are vulnerable to human disturbance, such as areas where sea
turtles and seabirds are nesting or hatching. The superintendent will
establish these zones when necessary to avoid unacceptable human
impacts to these important resources. In such cases, only research
activities will be allowed so long as such research activities do not
impact these important resources. The public will be notified of any
restrictions through one or more of the methods listed in Sec. 1.7 of
this chapter.
Research Natural Area
The RNA contains prime examples of natural resources, processes,
and ecosystems including significant genetic resources, which have
particular value for long-term observational studies. The RNA is
managed to provide the greatest possible protection of resources.
Recreational fishing and consumptive activities will not be allowed.
Boaters will be required to use mooring buoys, and anchoring will be
prohibited. Research activities in RNAs generally are restricted to
non-manipulative research. Education and other activities that will not
detract from an area's research values will be allowed. The RNA
complements the adjacent 151 square nautical mile Tortugas Ecological
Reserve in the waters of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary,
which has goals and regulations consistent with those of the RNA,
including similar constraints on fishing.
Scientific studies have found that Dry Tortugas National Park and
the Tortugas region play a critical role in the function and dynamics
of the larger Florida Keys coral reef ecosystem. The Tortugas includes
spawning and nursery grounds for numerous fish. Larvae spawned from
adult populations are spread by a persistent system of currents and
eddies throughout the Florida Keys and up the Southeast coast which
should help replenish depleted fish populations.
Recent scientific studies of reef fisheries in Dry Tortugas
National Park have also documented significant declines in the size and
abundance of fish. As such, additional fishery management practices
should be considered to enable the National Park Service to meet its
statutory obligations under the National Park Service Organic Act (16
U.S.C. 1-4) and the requirement under Public Law 102-525 (16 U.S.C.
410xx et seq.) to ``protect and interpret a pristine subtropical marine
ecosystem, including an intact coral reef community.''
The RNA is a useful management tool to protect this pristine area
as well as provide sanctuaries for species that have been substantially
impacted by harvesting or habitat reduction, and to provide time for
altered systems to recover. The RNA complements the adjacent Tortugas
Ecological Reserve in the waters of the Florida Keys National Marine
Sanctuary, with consistent goals and constraints on fishing. In order
for the RNA and the Ecological Reserve to be biologically effective,
the full range of land and marine habitats and their associated
communities must be included in these areas. The National Marine
Sanctuary's Tortugas Ecological Reserve, with its deep reefs and
habitats, provides spawning areas for recreationally and commercially
important fish while the National Park's RNA, with its shallow reefs
and sea grass beds, provides nurseries and food for these fish and a
multitude of other marine species. The rationale and benefits from
establishment of the RNA are explained in greater detail in the ROD for
the FGMPA/EIS.
The proposed regulations pertaining to the RNA are intended to
protect, restore, and enhance the living resources of the Park;
contribute to the maintenance of natural assemblages of living
resources for future generations; provide places for species dependent
on such living resources to survive and propagate; achieve the
objective of resource protection while facilitating uses not prohibited
by other authorities; reduce conflicts between such compatible uses;
and achieve the purposes of Public Law 102-525 (16 U.S.C. 410xx et
seq.) and the National Park Service Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1-4) of
1916.
The RNA also responds to the National Park Service's statutory
authority (16 U.S.C. 5935) to provide opportunities for scientific
research. The RNA and the larger Tortugas Ecological Reserve constitute
a rare opportunity to cooperatively advance the science of marine
ecology and marine resource management through direct observation of
how resources within these areas respond to protection. Application of
the research results in Park management programs will implement
statutory direction to assure that resource management is enhanced by
utilization of a broad
[[Page 17780]]
program of the highest quality science and information (16 U.S.C.
5932).
By designating the Research Natural Area, the National Park Service
hopes to realize the area's full potential and offer outstanding
opportunities for scientific research, visitor education and
appreciation of an intact marine ecosystem. These goals are consistent
with the objectives of Executive Order 13089 on Coral Reef Protection,
Executive Order 13151 on Marine Protected Areas, the U.S. Coral Reef
Task Force's March 2000 National Action Plan To Conserve Coral Reefs,
and the 2004 U.S. Ocean Action Plan.
Section-by-Section Analysis
(a) What terms do I need to know?
In order to provide clarity and reduce possible confusion, fifteen
definitions have been included in this paragraph. They include:
Baitfish, cast net, designated anchorage, dip net, finfish, flat wake,
guide fishing, live rock, lobster, marine life, not available for
immediate use, ornamental tropical fish, permits, research natural
area, and shrimp. Common fish names referred to in the regulations are
further clarified by including scientific names.
(b) Are there recreational fishing restrictions that I need to know?
Section 2.3(a) of this chapter adopts non-conflicting state fishing
laws as part of the general NPS regulations applicable to all units of
the National Park System unless regulations for particular park areas
specify otherwise. For Dry Tortugas National Park, we are proposing
additional requirements relating to fishing to achieve the park's
purposes and implement planning decisions. Recreational fishing
activities must comply with the state regulations unless those
activities are otherwise restricted or prohibited in this section. Any
reference to fishing in Sec. 7.27 refers to recreational fishing,
which is the taking, attempting to take, or possessing of fish for
personal use. This is the same definition used by the State of Florida.
All references to commercial fishing have been removed since this
activity is already prohibited by 36 CFR 2.3(d)(4).
The intent of paragraph (b)(1) is to allow the superintendent to
impose restrictions or closures to protect a fish species within the
park. In emergency situations, after consulting with the Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the superintendent may impose
closures and establish conditions or restrictions necessary pertaining
to fishing, including but not limited to species of fish that may be
taken, seasons and hours during which fishing may take place, methods
of taking, and size, bag and possession limits. In emergency situations
where consultation in advance is not possible, the superintendent will
consult within 24-hours of the initiation of closures or restrictions.
Such emergency closures or restrictions are temporary in nature and may
be for up to a 30-day period which may be extended once for up to an
additional 30-day period by the superintendent. In other situations
pertaining to fishing (i.e., non-emergency situations or the extension
of emergency closures or restrictions beyond these two emergency
periods), the superintendent shall consult with and obtain the
concurrence of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
prior to acting. This provision of such closures and restrictions is in
furtherance of the park's enabling legislation, which identifies
protection of fish and wildlife as a purpose of its establishment.
Paragraph (b)(2) identifies which fish can be taken and the legal
methods for taking these fish. Fishing is limited to fin fish caught by
a closely attended hook-and-line, bait fish caught by hook-and-line,
cast nets or dip nets, and shrimp caught by dip nets or cast nets.
These restrictions are not new. For the last 10 years, they have been
enforced through the Superintendent's Compendium, which serves as a
local management guide authorized by 36 CFR 1.5. Including these
restrictions in this proposed regulation increases public awareness of
their applicability. The previous restriction in 36 CFR 7.27(a)(5)(i),
that limits cast nets to 12 feet in diameter, has been removed. There
appears to be no compelling ecological or environmental reason to
restrict the size of the cast nets. This proposed change would bring
the park's regulations into conformity with state regulations.
Paragraph (b)(3) identifies areas that are closed to fishing,
including the RNA set forth in the 2001 ROD. Note, however, that
paragraph (b)(3)(i) includes provisions that allow vessels to transit
the RNA with legally harvested fish and fishing gear onboard. The
provisions of paragraph (b)(3) are similar to the regulations
applicable to the adjacent Tortugas Ecological Reserve within the
Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (19 CFR 922.164; Florida
Administrative Code 68B-6.003). The other closed areas are the waters
inside the Garden Key moat and those within the designated swimming and
snorkeling area. Fishing in these areas has been found to be
incompatible with the identified visitor activities of boating,
swimming and snorkeling, and for safety reasons in the helicopter-
landing zone.
Paragraph (b)(4) identifies specific prohibitions on fishing within
the park. This paragraph lists certain fishing practices that differ
from state of Florida regulations because they are incompatible with
the goals and management direction of the Park.
Paragraph (b)(4)(i) provides for complete protection of lobster
within the park. All existing regulations found in 36 CFR 7.27 (a)(2)
related to recreational fishing catch limits for lobster have been
deleted. Prohibiting individuals from being in the water, when they
have lobster onboard their vessel will further enhance the protection
of park resources. This ``prima facie'' (at first view) evidence of
violation is similar to the state of Florida regulations for the
Biscayne Bay/Card Sound Spiny Lobster Sanctuary (FAC 68B-11.004), and
for John Pennecamp Coral Reef State Park (FAC 68B-24.005). In Dry
Tortugas National Park, the harvesting of lobster has been previously
prohibited through the use of the superintendent's authority to
regulate public use under 36 CFR 1.5. This prohibition was based on
data collected by NPS biologists in a 1975 study, which indicated that
legal harvesting was removing almost 90% of the lobster within the
park. The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council concurred with this
finding and recommended that the park be established as a sanctuary for
lobster to assist in maintaining a population for dispersal to areas
outside the park.
The proposed regulations in paragraph (b)(4)(ii), concerning
possession and use of spearguns and other weapons are similar to
regulations for the ecological reserves and sanctuary preservation
areas found within the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (15 CFR
922.164). The state of Florida has similar regulations restricting
spearfishing activities found in FS 370.172. This proposed regulation
expands on the current regulation, 36 CFR 7.27(a)(7), to include guns,
bows and other similarly powered weapons. Paragraph (b)(4)(iii)
recognizes that a gaff is a common fishing device used to retrieve
legally taken fish from the water, while identifying other prohibited
fishing devices.
Although all natural resources within a national park area are
protected from removal, disturbance, injury, or destruction by the
general regulations found in 36 CFR 2.1, the provision at paragraph
(b)(4)(iv) clarifies that ornamental tropical fish as well as all other
forms of marine life within Dry Tortugas National Park are specifically
[[Page 17781]]
protected. This additional level of protection will help achieve the
congressional direction to protect a pristine subtropical marine
ecosystem, including an intact coral reef community.
The intent of (b)(4)(v) is to protect coral and other submerged
resources from damage or injury by prohibiting the dragging or trawling
of nets that are otherwise allowed to be used in the park.
Paragraph (b)(4)(vi) prohibits the use of nets, other than dip or
cast nets. The state of Florida general recreational fishing
regulations allow other nets (bully nets, frame and push nets, beach or
haul seines) which are inappropriate and harmful to various submerged
resources in the park.
Current regulations pertaining to sea turtles and conch found in 36
CFR 7.27(a)(1) and (3) have been removed as unnecessary. The state of
Florida has prohibited the taking of conch since 1985 and the general
NPS regulations already adopt all non-conflicting state laws. Also, 36
CFR 7.27 (b)(4)(iv) will prohibit the taking of any ornamental tropical
fish or other marine life. Because all sea turtles are currently listed
as endangered or threatened species under the Endangered Species Act
(16 U.S.C. 1538), it is unnecessary to duplicate prohibitions on their
taking in these proposed regulations.
Consistent with 36 CFR 5.3, paragraph (b)(5) requires that all fee-
for-service guides (including guides for fishing and diving) obtain a
permit or other NPS approved commercial use authorization. This permit
system allows the park to better manage the fisheries and other park
resources. The superintendent may limit the number of permitted guides
within the park in order to conserve park resources and enhance the
visitor experience.
(c) Are there any areas of the park closed to the public?
Yes. Paragraph (c) identifies areas that will be closed to public
access. The Long/Bush Keys coral patch has been identified by
biologists as ``fused'' staghorn (Acropora prolifera), a very rare
hybrid of staghorn and elkhorn corals. This coral patch is threatened
by a disease that is devastating staghorn and elkhorn coral in Biscayne
National Park and the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Hospital
and Long Keys have been closed for the last 10 years pursuant to the
Superintendent's Compendium authority under 36 CFR 1.5. The largest
remaining breeding colony of frigate birds in the United States lives
on Long Key. The threatened masked booby and other sea birds live and
breed on Hospital Key. Seasonal closures of Bush Key, East Key, and
portions of Loggerhead Key for turtle and bird nesting will continue to
be designated through the Superintendent's Compendium. See 36 CFR 1.5,
1.7.
(d) Is Loggerhead Key open to the public?
Loggerhead Key will be open to the public subject to closures in
certain areas and restrictions on certain activities. Loggerhead Key is
the largest key in the park and contains an operating 150-foot
lighthouse and other structures. Most of the island falls within the
RNA; however, the center portion, containing the lighthouse and the
other structures, falls within a historic preservation/adaptive use
zone. Paragraph (d) is consistent with the GMPA's decision to manage
access and recreational activities on Loggerhead Key. To protect the
natural and cultural resources of the island, as well as providing
appropriate visitor experiences, the superintendent may impose terms
and conditions on activities as necessary. The public will be notified
of any such requirements through one or more of the methods listed in
Sec. 1.7 of this chapter. Such terms and conditions include, but are
not limited to: docking, hiking restrictions, beach and swimming
access, and other restrictions or closures necessary to conserve the
natural and cultural resources of the island.
(e) Are there restrictions that apply to anchoring a vessel in the
park?
Paragraph (e) addresses anchoring locations in general and
anchoring prohibitions in the RNA. In the past, boaters have commonly
anchored in sea grass beds and rubble bottom, which has resulted in
unacceptable impacts to park resources. By restricting anchoring to
authorized locations and prohibiting anchoring in all other areas,
except in emergencies, degradation to coral reefs and seagrass meadows
will be significantly reduced. Paragraph (e)(1) requires vessels to use
mooring buoys. The RNA requires a higher level of protection of the
marine ecosystem; thus the use of anchors in this area is prohibited.
Paragraph (e)(2) specifies where vessels can anchor. The
``designated anchorage'' identified in the existing 36 CFR 7.27(b) is
also revised to reflect the GMPA's management zone which calls for
limiting anchorage of vessels from sunset to sunrise to the historic
preservation/adaptive use zone around Garden Key. This ``designated
anchorage'' is any sand or rubble bottom within one nautical mile of
the Fort Jefferson Harbor Light. This area has been identified as the
designated anchorage through the use of the Superintendent's Compendium
for the previous 10 years.
Paragraph (e)(4) imposes restrictions on anchoring by commercial
fishing and shrimping vessels consistent with U.S. Coast Guard
regulations found in 33 CFR 110.190.
(f) What vessel operations are prohibited?
This paragraph addresses several issues of unsafe or otherwise
prohibited vessel operations. The Fort Jefferson moat is closed to
vessels to preserve and protect the historic scene and prevent damage
to the structures. Vessel use in the moat could damage the walls of the
fort and the integrity of the moat wall. Because of the large volume of
vessel traffic in and around the Garden Key and Bird Key harbors,
vessels are required to operate at a flat wake speed to prevent injury
and damage resulting from boat wakes.
(g) What are the regulations regarding the discharge of materials in
park waters?
Paragraph (g) provides for greater protection of the water quality
within the park by generally prohibiting the discharge or deposit of
any material or substance in park waters. The NPS wishes to maintain
the highest possible water quality, free of bacterial and chemical
contamination, for health and safety reasons as well as to maintain the
park's environment. The NPS recognizes that certain discharges from
vessels, such as bilge water, gray water and engine exhaust cannot be
contained and some natural substances, such as fish parts, would have
minimal impact on the water quality and therefore, would be allowed.
These proposed regulations are similar to the regulations found in the
Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (15 CFR 922.163). To address
future issues regarding the discharge of materials or substances in
park waters, the superintendent may impose further restrictions as
necessary to protect park resources, visitors, or employees. The public
will be notified of any changes through one or more methods listed in
Sec. 1.7 of this chapter.
(h) What are the permit requirements in the park?
Paragraph (h) requires that individuals obtain a permit from the
superintendent in order to take part in any recreational activity
occurring from a vessel within the park. By definition, permits may be
issued in writing or be
[[Page 17782]]
provided by oral (radio or telephone) authorization. Permitted
activities may include anchoring, fishing, snorkeling, diving, wildlife
viewing, photography, and the use of mooring buoys. In the RNA, no
permits will be issued for anchoring or fishing as these are prohibited
activities. Transiting the park by vessel without stopping to engage in
research or recreational activities in the park shall not require a
permit. All research conducted in the park also requires a permit. In
the RNA, permits will only be issued for non-manipulative research
(i.e., that which does not alter the existing condition).
(i) How are coral and other underwater features protected in the park?
The coral formations within the park are internationally recognized
as unique and significant. Public Law 102-525 establishing the park
requires protection of the ``pristine subtropical marine ecosystems,
including an intact coral reef community.'' Accordingly, this rule
proposes new provisions for the protection of corals. Significant
damage to coral can be caused by divers or snorkelers handling or
standing on coral, especially in areas of heavy use. The NPS hopes to
mitigate this damage by specifically prohibiting these actions, thereby
resulting in persons being responsible for any damage that occurs to
the coral through contact with their body or their equipment, such as
fins, SCUBA tanks, gauges, or cameras. Language is also included to
prohibit taking or removing corals and live rock. These provisions are
similar to special regulations in the adjacent Florida Keys National
Marine Sanctuary (15 CFR 922.163). Coral damage caused by vessels is
often attributed to carelessness of vessel operators but can be avoided
through more careful vessel operation. This proposed rule would make
vessel operators responsible for preventing damage to corals by their
vessels. This provision is similar to regulations in the adjacent
Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (15 CFR 922.163).
Paragraph (i)(3) would result in vessel operator responsibility for
any damage to coral, seagrass, or any other underwater feature caused
by their anchors or anchor parts. This is to prevent damage to fragile
resources and assure the highest level of resource protection.
(j) What restrictions do I need to know when on or near shipwrecks
found in the park?
Paragraph (j) provides specific protection for wrecked or abandoned
craft and their cargo. Dry Tortugas National Park possesses one of the
greatest concentrations of historically significant shipwrecks in North
America, with some dating back to the 1600's. Within the park boundary,
there have been more than 275 historically documented maritime
casualties (shipwrecks, groundings, strandings), and human activity has
left a significant material record. Protection of submerged cultural
resources is a park priority, as well as a management purpose
identified in Public Law 102-525 (16 U.S.C. 410xx et seq.). Consistent
with the park's statutory mandate, these regulations would provide
specific protection for these cultural resources in addition to
protections provided by regulations in 36 CFR 2.1, the Antiquities Act
(16 U.S.C. 431-433) and its implementing regulations (43 CFR part 3),
the Archeological Resources Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 470aa-mm) and its
implementing regulations (43 CFR part 7), the Florida Historical
Resources Act of 1997 (F.S. chap 267 rev 1993) and its implementing
regulations (Florida Administrative Code 1A-31).
(k) Can aircraft land in the park?
Paragraph (k) allows the superintendent to manage aircraft
operations by requiring users to obtain a permit to land seaplanes in
the park. Seaplanes provide transportation for a significant number of
park visitors. The NPS's general regulation at 36 part CFR 2.17
authorizes the superintendent to designate, through a special
regulation, operating/landing locations within the park. It also
prohibits aircraft from operating under power within 500 feet of
swimming beaches, boat docks or piers unless designated through a
special regulation. In order to reach the designated ramp for
discharging passengers, seaplanes must taxi within 500 feet of dock
areas. This paragraph will specify that a landing or takeoff may not be
made within 500 feet of Garden Key or 500 feet of Bush Key (when it is
closed for wildlife nesting), but taxiing is allowed when seaplane use
is permitted. The existing regulations use a 300-yard limit for
approaches, landings and takeoffs. The new limit of 500 feet will also
bring these regulations in line with the general aircraft regulations
provision of 500 feet.
Compliance With Other Laws
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order 12866)
(1) This rule will not have an effect of $100 million or more on
the economy. It will not adversely affect in a material way the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities. The NPS has completed the report ``Cost-Benefit Analysis:
Proposed Regulations Implementing the Final General Management Plan
Amendment/Environmental Impact Statement for Dry Tortugas National
Park.'' (August 15, 2005.) This document may be viewed on the park's
Web site at: https://www.nps.gov/drto/pphtml/documents.html.
This conclusion is based on the fact that the proposed regulations
would not impose significant impacts on any business. The regulations
are based on the FGMPA/EIS or are restatements, clarifications, and
definitions of previously established policies and regulations
resulting in no change or effects on the economy.
(2) This rule will not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency. Actions
taken under this rule will not interfere with other agencies or local
government plans, policies or controls. This rule is an agency specific
rule.
(3) This rule will not materially affect budgetary effects of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights or
obligations of their recipients. This rule will have no effects on
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights or
obligations of their recipients. No grants or other forms of monetary
supplements are involved.
(4) This rule does not raise novel legal or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rulemaking will
not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
This certification is based on a report entitled ``Regulatory
Flexibility Threshold Analysis: Proposed Regulations Implementing the
Final General Management Plan Amendment/Environmental Impact Statement
for Dry Tortugas National Park.'' (January 27, 2005). This document may
be viewed on the park's website at: https://www.nps.gov/drto/pphtml/
documents.html.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This proposed rule:
[[Page 17783]]
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule will not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local or tribal governments or the private sector. This rule is an
agency specific rule and does not impose any other requirements on
other agencies, governments, or the private sector.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, the rule does not have
significant takings implications. A taking implication assessment is
not required. No taking of personal property will occur as a result of
this rule.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, the rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment. This proposed rule only applies to the use of
NPS administered lands and waters. Both the State of Florida and the
United States claim title to submerged lands located within the
boundaries of the park established by Congress. Rather than addressing
this issue through potentially protracted litigation, the State and the
Department have entered into the ``Management Agreement for Certain
Submerged Lands in Monroe County, Florida, Located within Dry Tortugas
National Park'' approved by the Florida Governor and Cabinet on August
9, 2005 and by the Secretary of the Interior on December 20, 2005. This
document may be viewed on the park's Web site at https://nps.gov/drto/
pphtml/documents.html. The proposed regulations are consistent with the
requirements of the Management Agreement. Once final, the regulations
shall be reviewed at least every five years, and as appropriate,
revised, and reissued, based upon the results of the research program
conducted pursuant to the Management Agreement as well as the
information contained in the management plan status report prepared by
the National Park Service detailing the status and activities of the
implementation of the FGMPA/EIS. Information and data collected
regarding the effectiveness and performance of the RNA will also be
reviewed and evaluated. Under adaptive management, NPS may consider
changes in the RNA, including boundary adjustments and modifications to
the protection and conservation management strategies applicable to the
RNA.
Consistent with the Management Agreement, the National Park Service
will obtain the concurrence of the Board of Trustees of the Internal
Improvement Trust Fund regarding that portion of the regulations
pertaining to the management of submerged lands within the park.
Further, consistent with the Management Agreement, the National Park
Service shall submit for review to the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission proposed regulations as well as any proposed
revisions or amendments thereto.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Office of the
Solicitor has determined that this rule does not unduly burden the
judicial system and meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This regulation does not require an information collection from 10
or more parties and a submission under the Paperwork Reduction Act is
not required. An OMB Form 83-I is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Department of the Interior, National Park Service (NPS) has
prepared a Final General Management Plan Amendment/Environmental Impact
Statement (FGMPA/EIS) for Dry Tortugas National Park, Monroe County,
Florida. Five alternatives were evaluated for guiding the management of
the park over the next 15 to 20 years. The alternatives incorporate
various zoning applications and other management provisions to ensure
resource protection and quality visitor experience conditions. The
environmental consequences anticipated from implementation of each
alternative are addressed in the FGMPA/EIS. Impacts to natural and
cultural resources, visitor experience, socioeconomic environment, and
park operations/facilities are analyzed. The FGMPA/EIS was prepared in
conjunction with planning by the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary
(FKNMS or sanctuary), the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FFWCC) and the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council
(GMFMC) to establish a Tortugas Ecological Reserve (TER) in State and
Federal waters adjacent to Dry Tortugas National Park. State and
Federal approvals for the TER are complete and implementation of the
ecological reserve is underway.
After careful consideration of legislative mandates, visitation
trends, environmental impacts, relevant scientific studies, and
comments from the public and agencies, the National Park Service will
implement Alternative C as described in the Final GMPA/EIS issued in
January 2001 (with some minor clarifications, as listed in Appendix A,
Errata). This alternative best accomplishes the legislated purposes of
Dry Tortugas National Park and the statutory mission of the National
Park Service to provide long-term protection of park resources and
values while allowing for visitor use and enjoyment. It also furthers
the objectives of Executive Order 13089, Coral Reef Protection.
The goal of the selected action is to afford a high level of
protection to park resources and provide for appropriate types and
levels of high quality visitor experiences. This will be accomplished
through management zoning, establishing visitor carrying capacity for
specific locations in the park, using commercial services to direct and
structure visitor use, and instituting a permit system for private
boaters. A wide range of recreational and educational opportunities
will be available to visitors provided that appropriate resource
conditions are maintained. Visitor experiences will be enhanced due to
expanded access throughout the park and higher quality resources to
enjoy.
Several consultations took place with government agencies during
the EIS process, including the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary,
the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and the Gulf of
Mexico Fishery Management Council. Pursuant to section 7 requirements
of the Endangered Species Act, the NPS is consulting with the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service
regarding potential effects of the proposed regulations on federally
listed species.
The NPS Southeast Regional Director signed the Record of Decision
(ROD) on July 27, 2001. In reaching a decision, NPS carefully
considered the comments and concerns expressed by the public throughout
the EIS process. The EIS and
[[Page 17784]]
ROD are available online at: https://www.nps.gov/drto/pphtml/
documents.html or at Everglades National Park, as indicated above under
the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
The National Park Service has also carefully reviewed available
information regarding current environmental conditions at Dry Tortugas
National Park and environmental effects of the selected action. Based
on this review, the National Park Service has found no significant new
circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns and
bearing on the selected action or its impacts. Therefore, the National
Park Service has concluded that supplementation of the 2001
Environmental Impact Statement is unnecessary.
Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994,
``Government to Government Relations with Native American Tribal
Governments'' (59 FR 22951) and 512 DM 2, we have evaluated potential
effects on federally recognized Indian tribes and have determined that
there are no potential effects.
Clarity of Rule
Executive Order 12866 requires each agency to write regulations
that are easy to understand. We invite your comments on how to make
this rule easier to understand, including answers to questions such as
the following: (1) Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated? (2)
Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that interferes with
its clarity? (3) Does the format of the rule (grouping and order of
sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce its
clarity? (4) Would the rule be easier to read if it were divided into
more (but shorter) sections? (A ``section'' appears in bold type and is
preceded by the symbol ``Sec. '' and a numbered heading; for example
Sec. 7.27, Dry Tortugas National Park.) (5) Is the description of the
rule in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of the preamble helpful
in understanding the proposed rule? What else could we do to make the
rule easier to understand?
Send a copy of any comments that concern how we could make this
rule easier to understand to: Office of Regulatory Affairs, Department
of the Interior, Room 7229, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240.
You may also e-mail the comments to this address: Exsec@ios.doi.gov.
Drafting Information
The primary authors of this regulation are: Bonnie Foist, Lynda
Lancaster, Bob Howard, Bill Wright, Brien Culhane, and Elaine Hall of
Everglades National Park, Don Jodrey, Department of the Interior Office
of the Solicitor, and Cliff McCreedy, National Park Service, Natural
Resource Stewardship and Science and Jerry Case, Regulations Program
Manager, NPS, Washington, DC.
Public Participation
If you wish to comment, you may submit your comments by any one of
several methods. You may mail or hand deliver comments to
Superintendent, Everglades National Park, 40001 State Route 9336,
Homestead, FL 33034-6733 or fax to (305) 242-7711. Comments may also be
submitted on the Federal rulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Please identify
comments by: RIN 1024-AD45 or sent by e-mail to ever -- superintendent
@ nps.gov. Use RIN 1024-AD45 in the subject line.
Written or oral comments will also be accepted during a public
meeting to be held during the 60-day comment period. Date and location
of the meeting will be determined at a later date and will be announced
through local press releases and the park's Web site at https://
www.nps.gov/drto.
Our practice is to make comments, including names and addresses of
respondents, available for public review during regular business hours.
Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home address
from the rulemaking record, which we will honor to the extent allowable
by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must
state this prominently at the beginning of your comment. However, we
will not consider anonymous comments. We will make all submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying
themselves as representatives or officials or organizations or
businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
District of Columbia, National Parks, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service
proposes to amend 36 CFR part 7 as follows:
PART 7--SPECIAL REGULATIONS, AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM
1. The authority for part 7 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 460(q), 462(k); Sec. 7.96 also
issued under D.C. Code 8-137 (1981) and D.C. Code 40-721 (1981).
2. Sec. 7.27 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 7.27 Dry Tortugas National Park
(a) What terms do I need to know? The following terms apply to this
section only:
Baitfish means: ballyhoo (family Exocoetidae and genus
Hemiramphus), other genus may be included in this family; minnow
(families Cyprinodontidae, Peciliidae, or Aherinidae); mojarra (family
Gerreidae); mullet (family Mugilidae); pilchard (family Clupeidae);
pinfish (family Sparidae, genus Lagodon).
Cast net means a type of circular falling net, weighted on its
periphery, which is thrown and retrieved by hand, measuring 14 feet or
less stretched length (stretched length is defined as the distance from
the horn at the center of the net with the net gathered and pulled
taut, to the lead line).
Designated anchorage means any area of sand or rubble bottom within
one nautical mile of the Fort Jefferson Harbor Light.
Dip net means a hand held device for obtaining bait, the netting of
which is fastened in a frame. A dip net may not exceed three (3) feet
at its widest point.
Finfish means a member of subclasses Agnatha, Chondrichthyes, or
Osteichthyes.
Flat wake speed means the minimum required speed to leave a flat
wave disturbance close astern a moving vessel yet maintain steerageway,
but in no case in excess of 5 statute miles per hour.
Guide operations means the activity, of a person, partnership,
firm, corporation, or other entity to provide services for hire to
visitors of the park. This includes but is not limited to fishing,
diving, snorkeling, and wildlife viewing.
Live rock means any living marine organism or assemblage thereof
attached to a hard substrate,including dead coral or rock but not
individual mollusk shells.
Lobster means Shovelnosed or Spanish Lobster (Scyllarides
aequinoactialis), Slipper lobster (Parribacus antarcticus), Caribbean
spiny lobster (Panulirus argus), or spotted spiny lobster (Panulirus
guttatus).
Marine life means sponges, sea anenomes, corals, jellyfish, sea
[[Page 17785]]
cucumbers, starfish, sea urchins, octopus, crabs, shrimp, barnacles,
worms, conch, and other animals belonging to the Phyla Porifera,
Cnidaria, Echinodermata, Mollusca, Bryozoa, Brachiopoda, rthropoda,
Platyhilmenthes, and Annelida.
Not available for immediate use means not readily accessible for
immediate use, e.g., by being stowed unbaited in a cabin, locker or
similar storage area, or being securely covered and lashed to a deck or
bulkhead, or in a rod holder with hooks and lures removed.
Ornamental tropical fish usually means a brightly colored fish,
often used for aquarium purposes and which lives in close relationship
to coral communities, belonging to the families Syngathidae,
Apogonidae, Pomacentridae, Scaridae, Blennidae, Callionymidae,
Gobiidae, Ostraciidae, or Diodontidae.
Permit, in the case of 36 CFR Part 7.27, means an authorization in
writing or orally (e.g., via radio or telephonically).
Research Natural Area (RNA) at Dry Tortugas means the 46-square-
statute-mile area in the northwest portion of the park enclosed by
connecting with straight lines the adjacent points of 82[deg]51' W and
24[deg]36' N, and 82[deg]58' W and 24[deg]36' N west to the park
boundary, but excluding: (1) The approximately 3-square nautical mile
adaptive use zone designated by the superintendent with notice to the
public through one or more methods listed in Sec. 1.7 of this chapter;
(2) the designated anchorage; (3) Garden Key, Bush Key and Long Key; or
(4) the central portion of Loggerhead key including the lighthouse and
associated buildings.
Shrimp means a member of the genus Farfantepenaeus, Penaeus sp.
(b) Are there recreational fishing restrictions that I need to
know? (1) After consulting with and obtaining the concurrence of the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, based on management
objectives and the park fisheries research, the superintendent may
impose closures and establish conditions or restrictions necessary
pertaining to fishing, including but not limited to species of fish
that may be taken, seasons and hours during which fishing may take
place, methods of taking, and size, bag and possession limits. The
public will be notified of any changes through one or more methods
listed in Sec. 1.7 of this chapter. In emergency situations, after
consulting with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission,
the superintendent may impose temporary closures and establish
conditions or restrictions necessary, but not exceeding 30 days in
duration which may be extended for one additional 30 day period,
pertaining to fishing, including but not limited to species of fish
that may be taken, seasons and hours during which fishing may take
place, methods of taking, and size, bag and possession limits. In
emergency situations where consultation in advance is not possible, the
superintendent will consult with the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission within 24-hours of the initiation of the
temporary closure or restriction.
(2) Only the following may be legally taken from Dry Tortugas
National Park:
(i) Fin fish by closely attended hook-and-line;
(ii) Baitfish by closely attended hook and line, dip net, or cast
net and limited to 5 gallons per vessel per day;
(iii) Shrimp may be taken by dip net or cast net.
(3) The following waters and areas are closed to fishing:
(i) The Research Natural Area (RNA). Fish and fishing gear may be
possessed aboard a vessel in the RNA, provided such fish can be shown
not to have been harvested from within, removed from, or taken within,
the RNA as applicable, by being stowed in a cabin, locker, or similar
storage area prior to entering and during transit through the RNA,
provided further that such vessel is in continuous transit through the
RNA. Gear capable of harvesting fish may be aboard a vessel in the RNA,
provided such gear is not available for immediate use when entering and
during transit through the RNA and no presumption of fishing activity
shall be drawn therefrom.
(ii) Garden Key moat;
(iii) Within any swimming and snorkeling areas designated by buoys;
(iv) Within 50 feet of the historic coaling docks;
(v) Helipad areas, including the gasoline refueling dock.
(4) The following are prohibited:
(i) The possession of lobster within the boundaries of the park;
unless the individual took the lobster outside park waters and has the
proper State/Federal licenses and permits. Vessels with legally taken
lobster aboard which was taken outside the park may not have persons
overboard in park waters. The presence of lobster aboard a vessel in
park waters, while one or more persons from such vessel are overboard,
shall constitute prima facie evidence that such lobsters were harvested
from park waters in violation of this chapter.
(ii) The taking of fish by pole spear, Hawaiian sling, rubber
powered, pneumatic, or spring loaded gun or similar device known as a
speargun, air rifles, bows and arrows, powerheads, or explosive powered
guns. Operators of vessels within the park must break down and store
all described weapons so such gear is not available for immediate use.
(iii) The use of a hand held hook, gig, gaff, or snare is
prohibited, except that a gaff may be used for landing a fish lawfully
caught by hook and line when consistent with all requirements provided
herein including size and species restrictions.
(iv) The taking, possession or touching of any ornamental tropical
fish or marine life except as expressly provided in this section.
(v) Dragging or trawling a dip net or cast net.
(vi) The use of nets except as provided in (b)(2)(ii) and (iii).
(5) Engaging in guide operations (fee for service), including but
not limited to fishing and diving, except in accordance with the
provisions of a permit, contract, or other commercial use
authorization, or other written agreement with the United States and
administered under this chapter is prohibited.
(c) Are there any areas of the park closed to the public? Yes. The
following areas are closed to the public:
(1) The elkhorn (Acropora palmata) and staghorn (Acropora
prolifera) patches adjacent to and including the tidal channel
southeast of Long and Bush Keys and extending to 100 yards from the
exterior edge of either patch.
(2) Hospital and Long Keys.
(3) Areas designated by the superintendent in accordance with Sec.
1.5 and noticed to the public through one or more of the methods listed
in Sec. 1.7 of this chapter.
(d) Is Loggerhead Key open to the public? The superintendent shall
designate areas on Loggerhead Key as closed for public use, establish
closures or restrictions on and around the waters of Loggerhead Key,
and establish conditions for docking, swimming or wading, and hiking as
necessary to protect park resources, visitors, or employees. The public
will be notified of any such designations, closures or restrictions
through one or more methods listed in Sec. 1.7 of this chapter.
(e) Are there restrictions that apply to anchoring a vessel in the
park? (1) Anchoring in the Research Natural Area (RNA) is prohibited.
(2) All vessels in the RNA must use designated mooring buoys.
(3) Anchoring between sunset and sunrise is limited to the
designated anchorage area at Garden Key.
[[Page 17786]]
(4) Except in cases of emergency involving danger to life or
property, no vessel engaged in commercial fishing or shrimping shall
anchor in any of the channels, harbors or lagoons in the vicinity of
Garden Key, Bush Key, or the surrounding shoals outside of Bird Key
Harbor. Emergencies may include, but are not limited to, adverse
weather conditions, mechanical failure, medical emergencies or other
public safety situations.
(f) What vessel operations are prohibited? The following vessel
operations are prohibited:
(1) Operating a vessel in the Fort Jefferson Moat;
(2) Operating a vessel above a flat wake speed in the Garden Key
and Bird Key Harbor areas.
(g) What are the regulations regarding the discharge of materials
in park waters? (1) The discharge or deposit of materials or substances
of any kind within the boundaries of the park is prohibited, except for
the following:
(i) Fish, fish parts, chumming material, or bait used or produced
incidental to and while conducting recreational fishing activities;
(ii) Graywater from sinks, consisting of only water and food
particles;
(iii) Vessel cooling water, engine exhaust, or bilge water when not
contaminated by oil or other substances.
(2) The superintendent may impose further restrictions as necessary
to protect park resources, visitors, or employees. The public will be
notified of any such requirements through one or more methods listed in
Sec. 1.7 of this chapter.
(h) What are the permit requirements in the park? (1) A permit,
issued by the superintendent, is required for all non-commercial
vessels for which occupants are engaged in recreational activities,
including all activities in the RNA. Permitted recreational activities
include but are not limited to use of mooring buoys, snorkeling,
diving, wildlife viewing, and photography.
(2) A permit, issued by the superintendent, is required for a
person, group, institution, or organization conducting research
activities in the park.
(3) Vessels transiting the park without interruption shall not
require a permit.
(i) How are corals and other underwater natural features protected
in the park? (1) Taking, possessing, removing, damaging, touching,
handling, harvesting, disturbing, standing on, or otherwise injuring
coral, coral formation, seagrass or other living or dead organisms,
including marine invertebrates, live rock, and shells, is prohibited.
(2) Vessel operators are prohibited from allowing their vessel to
strike, injure, or damage coral, seagrass, or any other immobile
organism attached to the seabed.
(3) Vessel operators are prohibited from allowing an anchor, chain,
rope or other mooring device to be cast, dragged, or placed so as to
strike, break, abrade, or otherwise cause damage to coral formations,
sea grass, or submerged cultural resources.
(j) What restrictions do I need to know when on or near shipwrecks
found in the park? No person may destroy, molest, remove, deface,
displace, or tamper with wrecked or abandoned vessels of any type or
condition, or any cargo pertaining thereto; and, the survey, inventory,
dismantling, or recovery of any such wreck or cargo within the
boundaries of the park is prohibited unless permitted in writing by the
superintendent.
(k) How are aircraft operations restricted in the park? (1) Landing
an aircraft in Dry Tortugas National Park may occur only in accordance
with a permit issued by the superintendent pursuant to Sec. 1.6 of
this chapter.
(2) When landing is authorized by permit, the following
requirements also apply:
(i) Aircraft may be landed on the waters within a radius of 1 mile
of Garden Key, but a landing or takeoff may not be made within 500 feet
of Garden Key, or within 500 feet of Bush Key when Bush Key is closed
to the public to protect nesting wildlife. The operation of aircraft is
also subject to Sec. 2.17, except that seaplanes may be taxied closer
than 500 feet to the Garden Dock while enroute to or from the
designated ramp, north of the dock.
(ii) Seaplanes may be moored or brought up on land only on the
designated beach, north of the Garden Key dock.
Matthew J. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 06-3295 Filed 4-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P