Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Temporary Suspension of Container Regulations, 16979-16982 [06-3240]
Download as PDF
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
on small sizes will provide useful
information. The information can be
used by handlers in making marketing
decisions, and may help stabilize the
pricing for all red seedless grapefruit.
Also, having access to this shipping
information will assist the Committee in
maintaining yearly statistical
information on small sizes. The
Committee believes this information
will be useful when considering
establishing future percentage of size
regulation. Knowing the volume of
small sizes shipped during the 2005–06
season and its market impact may also
help the Committee when considering
the implementation of percentage size
regulation during other crop reduced
years. Consequently, the Committee
recommended maintaining the reporting
requirement for small sizes for the
remainder of the 2005–06 season. As
individual handlers are already
accustomed to reporting this
information, continuing to report it will
not create any additional costs on
handlers.
The Committee considered several
alternatives when discussing these
actions. At the May 10, 2005, meeting,
one alternative discussed was
maintaining the way a handler’s average
week was calculated using the
immediately preceding three seasons.
The Committee believes including
numbers from the 2004–05 season
would result in averages unreflective of
a handler’s shipments. Therefore, this
alternative was rejected. The Committee
also considered not recommending
percentage of size regulation for the
2005–06 season. However, the
Committee agreed percentage of size
regulation should be established at the
levels recommended and then be
revisited throughout the season as more
information became available.
Therefore, this alternative was also
rejected. At the November 3, 2005,
meeting, the Committee considered
maintaining the percentages at their
current level, or relaxing the
percentages to allow for the shipment of
more small sizes. However, considering
the size of the remaining crop following
the damage sustained from Hurricane
Wilma, the Committee rejected this
alternative.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the information collection
requirements contained in this rule have
been previously approved by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189. As with
all Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Apr 04, 2006
Jkt 208001
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sectors.
AMS is committed to compliance
with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires
Government agencies in general to
provide the public the option of
submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible.
In addition, as noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict
with this rule. However, red seedless
grapefruit must meet the requirements
as specified in the U.S. Standards for
Grades of Florida Grapefruit (7 CFR
51.760 through 51.784) issued under the
Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7
U.S.C. 1621 through 1627).
Further, the Committee’s meetings
were widely publicized throughout the
citrus industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations. Like all Committee
meetings, the May 10, 2005, and
November 3, 2005, meetings were
public meetings and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express
their views on this issue.
An interim final rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on September 14, 2005. Copies
of the rule were mailed by the
Committee’s staff to all Committee
members and Florida citrus handlers. In
addition, the rule was made available
through the Internet by USDA and the
Office of the Federal Register. That rule
provided for a 30-day comment period
which ended October 14, 2005. One
comment was received.
The commenter raised concerns about
fair trade for consumers and restraints of
trade in general. However, the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937 and the order provisions
themselves provide authority to limit
shipments of any grade or size, or both,
of any variety of Florida citrus. The
comment has been noted. The
Committee has recommended removing
the weekly percentages established for
the first 22 weeks of the 2005–06
season, and this action implements that
recommendation. Therefore, no changes
will be made as a result of this
comment.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16979
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
Committee’s recommendation, and
other information, it is found that
finalizing the interim final rule, with a
change, as published in the Federal
Register (70 FR 54235, September 14,
2005) will tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 905
Grapefruit, Marketing agreements,
Oranges, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Tangelos, Tangerines.
I Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 7 CFR part 905 which was
published at 70 FR 54235 on September
14, 2005, is adopted as a final rule with
the following change:
PART 905—ORANGES, GRAPEFRUIT,
TANGERINES, AND TANGELOS
GROWN IN FLORIDA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 905 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
§ 905.350
[Removed and reserved]
2. Section 905.350 is removed and
reserved.
I
Dated: March 30, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–3237 Filed 4–4–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Docket No. FV06–922–1 IFR]
Apricots Grown in Designated
Counties in Washington; Temporary
Suspension of Container Regulations
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule suspends the
container regulations prescribed under
the Washington apricot marketing order
for the 2006 shipping season only. The
marketing order regulates the handling
of fresh apricots grown in designated
counties in the State of Washington, and
is administered locally by the
Washington Apricot Marketing
Committee (Committee). This relaxation
of the regulations provides the apricot
industry with increased marketing
flexibility by allowing handlers to pack
and ship apricots in any size, shape, or
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
16980
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
type of container. The Committee
recommended a temporary suspension
of the container regulations so that it
can thoroughly evaluate the impact the
relaxation has on the apricot industry
prior to taking any action for subsequent
seasons.
DATES: Effective April 6, 2006, through
March 31, 2007. Comments received by
June 5, 2006 will be considered prior to
issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; E-mail:
moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or Internet:
https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the docket
number and the date and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public
inspection in the Office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours or
can be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. Curry, Northwest Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220
SW. Third Avenue, Suite 385, Portland,
Oregon 97204–2807; Telephone: (503)
326–2724; Fax: (503) 326–7440; or
George Kelhart, Technical Advisor,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491; Fax: (202) 720–8938.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone (202) 720–
2491; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 922 (7 CFR part 922)
regulating the handling of apricots
grown in designated counties in
Washington, hereinafter referred to as
the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–
674), hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Apr 04, 2006
Jkt 208001
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule suspends the container
regulations (§ 922.306) prescribed under
the order until March 31, 2007. This
rule will provide additional flexibility
to the apricot industry by allowing
handlers to pack apricots in any type,
shape, or size container. The container
regulations prescribed under § 922.306
will resume on April 1, 2007, for the
2007–2008 and future seasons unless
the Committee recommends, and the
USDA approves, action to extend the
suspension. The Committee
recommended a temporary suspension
of the regulations rather than an openended suspension to help ensure that a
thorough analysis of the 2006 shipping
season is completed prior to any
possible future action regarding the
issue of container regulation
suspension.
Section 922.52 of the order authorizes
the issuance of regulations for grade,
size, quality, maturity, pack, and
container for any variety of apricots
grown in the production area. Section
922.52(a)(3) specifically authorizes the
establishment of the container
regulations found in § 922.306. Section
922.53 authorizes the modification,
suspension, or termination of
regulations issued pursuant to § 922.52.
Authority to regulate the size, weight,
dimension and pack of containers used
in the marketing of fresh apricots was
included in the order when
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
promulgated in 1957. Container
regulatory authority was included in the
order to provide container
standardization, to enhance orderly
marketing conditions, and to provide for
increased producer returns. To provide
the industry with needed flexibility,
handlers are also authorized to make
test shipments in experimental
containers. This provision (§ 922.110),
whenever container regulations are
effective, allows handlers to apply to the
Committee seasonally to pack and ship
in containers that would otherwise not
be authorized by the container
regulations.
The Committee meets prior to each
season to consider recommendations for
modification, suspension, or
termination of any regulatory
requirements for Washington apricots
that are issued on a continuing basis.
Committee meetings are open to the
public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
The USDA reviews the Committee
recommendations along with any
supportive information submitted by the
Committee, as well as information from
other available resources, and
determines whether modification,
suspension, or termination of the
regulatory requirements would tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
During such a review at its February
8, 2006, meeting, the Committee
unanimously recommended suspending
the container regulations for the 2006
shipping season. The Committee
recommended that this rule be effective
no later than June 1, 2006, to ensure that
the earliest shipments of apricots benefit
from the relaxed regulations.
When effective, § 922.306 provides
that apricots must be handled
domestically in (1) Open containers or
telescopic fiberboard cartons weighing
28 pounds or greater; (2) closed
containers with 14 pounds or more of
apricots packed in a row-faced or traypack configuration; (3) closed containers
with 12 pounds (or more) of random
sized, non row-faced apricots; or (4)
closed containers with 24 pounds or
more of loose-packed apricots.
Comments made at the public meeting
indicate that container standardization
has contributed to orderly marketing in
the past. Handlers report that buyers are
increasingly interested in nontraditional packaging options designed
for better handling and greater
consumer acceptance. Handlers also
desire greater latitude in choosing the
optimum weight for a particular type of
pack. Packaging options could also
include consumer-friendly ‘‘clam shell’’
containers or other similar type
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
containers designed to enhance the
appearance of individual pieces of fruit.
This temporary suspension of the
container regulations will provide the
industry with such flexibility, while
providing the Committee with the
ability to evaluate the effect the
relaxation has on the orderly marketing
of the apricot crop during the 2006
shipping season.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 300 apricot
producers within the regulated
production area and approximately 22
regulated handlers. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $6,000,000.
For the 2005 apricot shipping season,
the Washington Agricultural Statistics
Service has prepared a preliminary
report showing that the total 5,600 ton
apricot utilization sold for an average of
$997 per ton. Based on the number of
producers in the production area (300),
the average annual producer revenue
from the sale of apricots in 2005 can
thus be estimated at approximately
$18,611. In addition, based on
information from the Committee and
USDA’s Market News Service, 2005
f.o.b. prices ranged from $15.00 to
$20.00 per 24-pound loose-pack
container, and from $14.00 to $24.00 for
2-layer tray pack containers. With about
half of the 2005 season fresh apricot
pack-out of 4,471 tons in loose-pack
containers and about half in tray-pack
containers (weighing an average of
about 20 pounds each), all the
industry’s handlers would have
averaged gross receipts of less than
$750,000 from the sale of fresh apricots.
Thus, the majority of producers and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Apr 04, 2006
Jkt 208001
handlers of Washington apricots may be
classified as small entities.
At its February 8, 2006, meeting the
Committee recommended the temporary
suspension of the order’s container
regulations (§ 922.306). Section
922.52(a)(3) of the order specifically
authorizes the establishment of
container regulations. Further, § 922.53
authorizes the modification, suspension,
or termination of regulations issued
pursuant to § 922.52. The temporary
relaxation in the container regulations is
expected to provide the apricot industry
with increased marketing flexibility by
allowing handlers to pack and ship
apricots in any size, shape, or type of
container. Container regulations have
been utilized in past seasons to provide
a degree of standardization and thus
have helped in providing the industry
with orderly marketing conditions.
Rapidly changing market dynamics have
convinced the Committee that such
standardization may no longer be
necessary to ensure orderly marketing.
The Committee recommended a
temporary suspension so it can conduct
a thorough evaluation of the impact the
relaxation had on the industry during
the 2006 shipping season prior to taking
any further action for subsequent
seasons.
The Committee anticipates that this
rule will not negatively impact small
businesses. This rule suspends the
container requirements found under
§ 922.306 of the order’s rules and
regulations and should provide
enhanced marketing opportunities. The
Committee anticipates that the only
additional costs this rule may have on
the industry would be associated with
the development and use of any new
containers.
The Committee discussed alternatives
to its recommendation to suspend the
container regulations. Primary amongst
these was the option of leaving the
container regulations intact without
change. After some discussion, the
Committee rejected this option as being
an inadequate response to the growing
interest for greater flexibility in
packaging. The Committee also
discussed whether to recommend an
indefinite suspension of the container
regulations—an alternative which was
rejected in favor of evaluation of the
suspension’s impact.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
apricot handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16981
AMS is committed to compliance
with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires
Government agencies in general to
provide the public the option of
submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible.
In addition, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
rule.
The Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the Washington
apricot industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations. Like all Committee
meetings, the February 8, 2006, meeting
was a public meeting and all entities,
both large and small, were able to
express their views on this issue.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on
suspension of the container regulations
under the Washington apricot marketing
order. Any comments received will be
considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
Committee’s recommendation, and
other information, it is found that the
regulation should be temporarily
suspended in order to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule suspends the
container regulations for Washington
apricots for the 2006 shipping season;
(2) the temporary suspension of the
container regulations was unanimously
recommended by the Committee at a
public meeting and all interested
persons had an opportunity to express
their views and provide input; (3)
Washington apricot handlers are aware
of this recommendation and need no
additional time to comply with the
relaxed requirements; (4) this rule
should be in effect by June 1, 2006, the
date 2006 season shipments of the
Washington apricot crop are expected to
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
16982
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
begin, and this action should apply to
the entire season’s shipments; and (5)
this rule provides a 60-day comment
period, and any comments received will
be considered prior to finalization of
this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 922 is amended as
follows:
PART 922—APRICOTS GROWN IN
DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN
WASHINGTON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 922 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
§ 922.306
[Suspended]
2. In part 922, § 922.306 is suspended
in its entirety through March 31, 2007.
I
Dated: March 30, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–3240 Filed 4–4–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 930
[Docket No. FV06–930–1 IFR]
Tart Cherries Grown in the States of
Michigan, et al.; Change in Certain
Provisions/Procedures Under the
Handling Regulations for Tart Cherries
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule removes volume
limitations on new product
development, new market development
and market expansion activities to
facilitate such activities; allows
handlers to receive diversion credit for
the voluntary destruction of finished,
marketable products that have
deteriorated in condition to provide
handlers more flexibility; adds a
procedure to keep Cherry Industry
Administrative Board (Board)
representation in line with current
district production levels; and revises
grower application and mapping
procedures under the grower diversion
program to make the process less
burdensome. These changes are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Apr 04, 2006
Jkt 208001
intended to improve the operation of the
marketing order and to increase the
demand for tart cherries and tart cherry
products. The changes were
unanimously recommended by the
Board, the body that locally administers
the marketing order. The marketing
order regulates the handling of tart
cherries grown in the States of
Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania,
Oregon, Utah, Washington, and
Wisconsin.
This rule becomes effective April
6, 2006.
Comments received by June 5, 2006
will be considered prior to issuance of
a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202)
720–8938, or E-mail:
moabdocket.clerk@usda.gov. Comments
should reference the docket number and
the date and page number of this issue
of the Federal Register and will be
available for public inspection in the
Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours or can be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patricia A. Petrella or Kenneth G.
Johnson, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, Unit
155, 4700 River Road, Riverdale, MD
20737; Telephone: (301) 734–5243, or
Fax: (301) 734–5275; or George Kelhart,
Technical Advisor, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, or Fax:
(202) 720–8938.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation, or obtain a guide on
complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements
and orders by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
DATES:
This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 930 (7 CFR part 930),
regulating the handling of tart cherries
produced in the States of Michigan,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
New York, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah,
Washington, and Wisconsin, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule will not preempt any
State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempt therefrom. Such handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction in equity to review USDA’s
ruling on the petition, provided an
action is filed not later than 20 days
after the date of the entry of the ruling.
Section 930.162 will be changed to
remove volume limitations on new
product development, new market
development, and market expansion
activities utilized by handlers to earn
diversion credits to meet restricted
percentage regulation withholding
requirements. Handler diversion is
authorized under § 930.59 of the order
and, when volume regulation is in
effect, handlers may fulfill restricted
percentage requirements by diverting
cherries or cherry products rather than
placing tart cherries in an inventory
reserve. Volume regulation is intended
to help the tart cherry industry stabilize
supplies and prices in years of excess
production. Volume regulation
percentages are in effect for the 2005–
2006 crop year (71 FR 1915, 1/12/2006).
Section 930.62 provides that the
Board, with the approval of the
Secretary, may exempt from the
provisions of §§ 930.41 (Assessments),
930.44 (Quality control), 930.51
(Issuance of volume regulations), 930.53
(Modification, suspension, or
termination of regulations), and 930.55
through 930.57 (Reserve regulations)
cherries which are diverted in
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16979-16982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3240]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Docket No. FV06-922-1 IFR]
Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Temporary
Suspension of Container Regulations
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule suspends the container regulations prescribed under
the Washington apricot marketing order for the 2006 shipping season
only. The marketing order regulates the handling of fresh apricots
grown in designated counties in the State of Washington, and is
administered locally by the Washington Apricot Marketing Committee
(Committee). This relaxation of the regulations provides the apricot
industry with increased marketing flexibility by allowing handlers to
pack and ship apricots in any size, shape, or
[[Page 16980]]
type of container. The Committee recommended a temporary suspension of
the container regulations so that it can thoroughly evaluate the impact
the relaxation has on the apricot industry prior to taking any action
for subsequent seasons.
DATES: Effective April 6, 2006, through March 31, 2007. Comments
received by June 5, 2006 will be considered prior to issuance of a
final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the
docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for public inspection in the Office
of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours or can be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Curry, Northwest Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW. Third Avenue, Suite 385,
Portland, Oregon 97204-2807; Telephone: (503) 326-2724; Fax: (503) 326-
7440; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491; Fax: (202) 720-8938.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone (202) 720-
2491; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 922 (7 CFR part 922) regulating the handling of
apricots grown in designated counties in Washington, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule suspends the container regulations (Sec. 922.306)
prescribed under the order until March 31, 2007. This rule will provide
additional flexibility to the apricot industry by allowing handlers to
pack apricots in any type, shape, or size container. The container
regulations prescribed under Sec. 922.306 will resume on April 1,
2007, for the 2007-2008 and future seasons unless the Committee
recommends, and the USDA approves, action to extend the suspension. The
Committee recommended a temporary suspension of the regulations rather
than an open-ended suspension to help ensure that a thorough analysis
of the 2006 shipping season is completed prior to any possible future
action regarding the issue of container regulation suspension.
Section 922.52 of the order authorizes the issuance of regulations
for grade, size, quality, maturity, pack, and container for any variety
of apricots grown in the production area. Section 922.52(a)(3)
specifically authorizes the establishment of the container regulations
found in Sec. 922.306. Section 922.53 authorizes the modification,
suspension, or termination of regulations issued pursuant to Sec.
922.52.
Authority to regulate the size, weight, dimension and pack of
containers used in the marketing of fresh apricots was included in the
order when promulgated in 1957. Container regulatory authority was
included in the order to provide container standardization, to enhance
orderly marketing conditions, and to provide for increased producer
returns. To provide the industry with needed flexibility, handlers are
also authorized to make test shipments in experimental containers. This
provision (Sec. 922.110), whenever container regulations are
effective, allows handlers to apply to the Committee seasonally to pack
and ship in containers that would otherwise not be authorized by the
container regulations.
The Committee meets prior to each season to consider
recommendations for modification, suspension, or termination of any
regulatory requirements for Washington apricots that are issued on a
continuing basis. Committee meetings are open to the public and
interested persons may express their views at these meetings. The USDA
reviews the Committee recommendations along with any supportive
information submitted by the Committee, as well as information from
other available resources, and determines whether modification,
suspension, or termination of the regulatory requirements would tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
During such a review at its February 8, 2006, meeting, the
Committee unanimously recommended suspending the container regulations
for the 2006 shipping season. The Committee recommended that this rule
be effective no later than June 1, 2006, to ensure that the earliest
shipments of apricots benefit from the relaxed regulations.
When effective, Sec. 922.306 provides that apricots must be
handled domestically in (1) Open containers or telescopic fiberboard
cartons weighing 28 pounds or greater; (2) closed containers with 14
pounds or more of apricots packed in a row-faced or tray-pack
configuration; (3) closed containers with 12 pounds (or more) of random
sized, non row-faced apricots; or (4) closed containers with 24 pounds
or more of loose-packed apricots.
Comments made at the public meeting indicate that container
standardization has contributed to orderly marketing in the past.
Handlers report that buyers are increasingly interested in non-
traditional packaging options designed for better handling and greater
consumer acceptance. Handlers also desire greater latitude in choosing
the optimum weight for a particular type of pack. Packaging options
could also include consumer-friendly ``clam shell'' containers or other
similar type
[[Page 16981]]
containers designed to enhance the appearance of individual pieces of
fruit.
This temporary suspension of the container regulations will provide
the industry with such flexibility, while providing the Committee with
the ability to evaluate the effect the relaxation has on the orderly
marketing of the apricot crop during the 2006 shipping season.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 300 apricot producers within the regulated
production area and approximately 22 regulated handlers. Small
agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration
(13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000,
and small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual
receipts are less than $6,000,000.
For the 2005 apricot shipping season, the Washington Agricultural
Statistics Service has prepared a preliminary report showing that the
total 5,600 ton apricot utilization sold for an average of $997 per
ton. Based on the number of producers in the production area (300), the
average annual producer revenue from the sale of apricots in 2005 can
thus be estimated at approximately $18,611. In addition, based on
information from the Committee and USDA's Market News Service, 2005
f.o.b. prices ranged from $15.00 to $20.00 per 24-pound loose-pack
container, and from $14.00 to $24.00 for 2-layer tray pack containers.
With about half of the 2005 season fresh apricot pack-out of 4,471 tons
in loose-pack containers and about half in tray-pack containers
(weighing an average of about 20 pounds each), all the industry's
handlers would have averaged gross receipts of less than $750,000 from
the sale of fresh apricots. Thus, the majority of producers and
handlers of Washington apricots may be classified as small entities.
At its February 8, 2006, meeting the Committee recommended the
temporary suspension of the order's container regulations (Sec.
922.306). Section 922.52(a)(3) of the order specifically authorizes the
establishment of container regulations. Further, Sec. 922.53
authorizes the modification, suspension, or termination of regulations
issued pursuant to Sec. 922.52. The temporary relaxation in the
container regulations is expected to provide the apricot industry with
increased marketing flexibility by allowing handlers to pack and ship
apricots in any size, shape, or type of container. Container
regulations have been utilized in past seasons to provide a degree of
standardization and thus have helped in providing the industry with
orderly marketing conditions. Rapidly changing market dynamics have
convinced the Committee that such standardization may no longer be
necessary to ensure orderly marketing. The Committee recommended a
temporary suspension so it can conduct a thorough evaluation of the
impact the relaxation had on the industry during the 2006 shipping
season prior to taking any further action for subsequent seasons.
The Committee anticipates that this rule will not negatively impact
small businesses. This rule suspends the container requirements found
under Sec. 922.306 of the order's rules and regulations and should
provide enhanced marketing opportunities. The Committee anticipates
that the only additional costs this rule may have on the industry would
be associated with the development and use of any new containers.
The Committee discussed alternatives to its recommendation to
suspend the container regulations. Primary amongst these was the option
of leaving the container regulations intact without change. After some
discussion, the Committee rejected this option as being an inadequate
response to the growing interest for greater flexibility in packaging.
The Committee also discussed whether to recommend an indefinite
suspension of the container regulations--an alternative which was
rejected in favor of evaluation of the suspension's impact.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large apricot handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry
and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to compliance with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires Government agencies in general
to provide the public the option of submitting information or
transacting business electronically to the maximum extent possible.
In addition, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this rule.
The Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the
Washington apricot industry and all interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations. Like all
Committee meetings, the February 8, 2006, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small, were able to express their
views on this issue.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on suspension of the container
regulations under the Washington apricot marketing order. Any comments
received will be considered prior to finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the Committee's recommendation, and other information, it is found that
the regulation should be temporarily suspended in order to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good
cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into
effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date
of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule suspends the container regulations for
Washington apricots for the 2006 shipping season; (2) the temporary
suspension of the container regulations was unanimously recommended by
the Committee at a public meeting and all interested persons had an
opportunity to express their views and provide input; (3) Washington
apricot handlers are aware of this recommendation and need no
additional time to comply with the relaxed requirements; (4) this rule
should be in effect by June 1, 2006, the date 2006 season shipments of
the Washington apricot crop are expected to
[[Page 16982]]
begin, and this action should apply to the entire season's shipments;
and (5) this rule provides a 60-day comment period, and any comments
received will be considered prior to finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 922 is amended as
follows:
PART 922--APRICOTS GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 922 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
Sec. 922.306 [Suspended]
0
2. In part 922, Sec. 922.306 is suspended in its entirety through
March 31, 2007.
Dated: March 30, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 06-3240 Filed 4-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P