Tart Cherries Grown in the States of Michigan, et al.; Change in Certain Provisions/Procedures Under the Handling Regulations for Tart Cherries, 16982-16986 [06-3238]
Download as PDF
16982
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
begin, and this action should apply to
the entire season’s shipments; and (5)
this rule provides a 60-day comment
period, and any comments received will
be considered prior to finalization of
this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 922 is amended as
follows:
PART 922—APRICOTS GROWN IN
DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN
WASHINGTON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 922 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
§ 922.306
[Suspended]
2. In part 922, § 922.306 is suspended
in its entirety through March 31, 2007.
I
Dated: March 30, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–3240 Filed 4–4–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 930
[Docket No. FV06–930–1 IFR]
Tart Cherries Grown in the States of
Michigan, et al.; Change in Certain
Provisions/Procedures Under the
Handling Regulations for Tart Cherries
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule removes volume
limitations on new product
development, new market development
and market expansion activities to
facilitate such activities; allows
handlers to receive diversion credit for
the voluntary destruction of finished,
marketable products that have
deteriorated in condition to provide
handlers more flexibility; adds a
procedure to keep Cherry Industry
Administrative Board (Board)
representation in line with current
district production levels; and revises
grower application and mapping
procedures under the grower diversion
program to make the process less
burdensome. These changes are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Apr 04, 2006
Jkt 208001
intended to improve the operation of the
marketing order and to increase the
demand for tart cherries and tart cherry
products. The changes were
unanimously recommended by the
Board, the body that locally administers
the marketing order. The marketing
order regulates the handling of tart
cherries grown in the States of
Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania,
Oregon, Utah, Washington, and
Wisconsin.
This rule becomes effective April
6, 2006.
Comments received by June 5, 2006
will be considered prior to issuance of
a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202)
720–8938, or E-mail:
moabdocket.clerk@usda.gov. Comments
should reference the docket number and
the date and page number of this issue
of the Federal Register and will be
available for public inspection in the
Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours or can be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patricia A. Petrella or Kenneth G.
Johnson, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, Unit
155, 4700 River Road, Riverdale, MD
20737; Telephone: (301) 734–5243, or
Fax: (301) 734–5275; or George Kelhart,
Technical Advisor, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, or Fax:
(202) 720–8938.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation, or obtain a guide on
complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements
and orders by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
DATES:
This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 930 (7 CFR part 930),
regulating the handling of tart cherries
produced in the States of Michigan,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
New York, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah,
Washington, and Wisconsin, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule will not preempt any
State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempt therefrom. Such handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction in equity to review USDA’s
ruling on the petition, provided an
action is filed not later than 20 days
after the date of the entry of the ruling.
Section 930.162 will be changed to
remove volume limitations on new
product development, new market
development, and market expansion
activities utilized by handlers to earn
diversion credits to meet restricted
percentage regulation withholding
requirements. Handler diversion is
authorized under § 930.59 of the order
and, when volume regulation is in
effect, handlers may fulfill restricted
percentage requirements by diverting
cherries or cherry products rather than
placing tart cherries in an inventory
reserve. Volume regulation is intended
to help the tart cherry industry stabilize
supplies and prices in years of excess
production. Volume regulation
percentages are in effect for the 2005–
2006 crop year (71 FR 1915, 1/12/2006).
Section 930.62 provides that the
Board, with the approval of the
Secretary, may exempt from the
provisions of §§ 930.41 (Assessments),
930.44 (Quality control), 930.51
(Issuance of volume regulations), 930.53
(Modification, suspension, or
termination of regulations), and 930.55
through 930.57 (Reserve regulations)
cherries which are diverted in
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
accordance with § 930.59. Cherries that
are diverted in accordance with § 930.59
must be used for new product
development and new market
development, used for experimental
purposes, or used for any other purpose
designated by the Board, including
cherries processed into products for
markets for which less then 5 percent of
the preceding 5-year average production
of cherries were utilized.
Section 930.162 specifies procedures
for obtaining approval for exempt uses
which include new product
development, new market development,
and market expansion. Currently, these
provisions specify volume limitations
for these exempt uses. The limitations
are specified in § 930.162(b)(1) which
states that once total industry utilization
for a new product exceeds 2 percent of
the five year average production of tart
cherries, the product shall no longer be
considered under development and not
be eligible for a new product
development exemption. The maximum
duration of any new product credit
activity is three years from the first date
of shipment.
Section 930.162(b)(2) regarding new
market development and market
expansion specifies the annual industrywide maximum diversion credit volume
at 10 million pounds RPE (Raw Product
Equivalent) of cherry products for all
expansion activities which is allocated
pro rata among participating handlers.
When these limitations were added
the Board believed that these markets
should be developed slowly. However,
it now believes that these limitations are
a disincentive to new product, market
development, and market expansion
activities involving large quantities. If a
handler’s new product activity involves
moving 8 million pounds of exempt tart
cherries, and 2 percent of the 5-year
average production is 5 million pounds,
the handler would only receive 5
million pounds of diversion credit, not
8 million pounds. The Board now
believes that this unnecessarily restricts
these handler activities and that
handlers should receive diversion credit
for the full diversion amount to
stimulate handler interest and facilitate
new product development activities.
With respect to new market
development and market expansion
activities, if the same handler had a pro
rata allocation representing 20 percent
of the industry-wide 10 million pound
limitation for all handlers participating
in these activities, this handler only
would receive diversion credit for 1.6
million pounds, not 8 million pounds.
The Board believes that this provision
should be removed to facilitate handler
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Apr 04, 2006
Jkt 208001
interest in new market development and
market expansion.
To facilitate these activities, the Board
recommended that the volume
limitations be removed from paragraphs
(b)(1) and (b)(2) to foster further handler
interest in new product, new market
development, and market expansion
activities. This is expected to result in
an increase in demand for tart cherries
and tart cherry products. The time
limitation for new product development
will remain in effect.
As previously stated in this
document, handler diversion is
authorized under § 930.59. Section
930.159 of the rules and regulations
under the order allows handlers to
divert cherries by destruction of the
cherries at the handler’s facility. Atplant diversion of cherries takes place
prior to placing cherries into the
processing line to ensure that the
cherries diverted were not simply an
undesirable or unmarketable product of
processing. Handlers also can receive
diversion credit for finished, marketable
tart cherry products that were
accidentally destroyed. Finished,
marketable cherry products might be
accidentally destroyed in a fire,
explosion, or because of a freezer
malfunction.
Handlers sometimes voluntarily
destroy finished, marketable cherry
products if the cherry products sustain
a loss of condition that renders them
unacceptable for use in normal market
channels (free tonnage outlets). To
permit handlers to recover some of their
costs incurred in acquiring, processing,
and storing such cherries, the Board
unanimously recommended that the atplant diversion procedures be
broadened so handlers can receive
diversion credit for the voluntary
destruction of such cherries. The
handler would not have to purchase
additional cherries to meet his/her
restricted percentage obligation, but
could simply use the diversion credit
received for the voluntarily destroyed
product.
To receive diversion credit under this
added option, the Board recommended
that the cherry products meet similar
criteria as accidentally destroyed
marketable product. That is, such cherry
products must: (1) Be owned by the
handler at the time of the voluntary
destruction; (2) be a marketable product
at the time of processing; (3) be
included in the handler’s end of year
handler plan; and (4) have been
assigned a Raw Product Equivalent
(RPE) by the handler to determine the
volume of cherries. In addition, the
condition and the voluntary destruction
as well as the disposition of the finished
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16983
tart cherry product must be verified by
a USDA inspector or a Board agent or
employee.
Handlers wishing to obtain diversion
certificates for finished tart cherry
products that are voluntarily destroyed
must apply for such diversion
certificates and sign an agreement that
disposition of the destroyed product
will take place under the supervision of
USDA’s Processed Products Branch
inspectors or Board inspectors. This will
allow the Board to verify that the
finished product was marketable, but
sustained a loss of condition, and that
it was disposed of properly.
Once diversion is satisfactorily
accomplished, handlers will receive
diversion certificates from the Board
stating the weight of cherries diverted.
Such diversion certificates can be used
to satisfy a handler’s restricted
percentage obligations.
In years with volume regulation,
restricted obligations also can be met
with diversion credits earned through
in-orchard diversion. This action
changes the procedures for grower
mapping under the grower diversion
program. Currently, under § 930.158
growers must file maps every year if
they intend to participate in the
voluntary grower diversion program.
Growers applying for diversion must
sign a grower diversion application
which states that the grower agrees to
comply with the regulations established
for a tart cherry diversion program. Each
map shall contain the grower’s name
and number assigned by the Board, the
grower’s address, block name or number
when appropriate, location of the
orchard or orchards and other
information which may be necessary to
accomplish the desired diversion. The
Board has recommended that the
original map and application have an
ongoing, continuing effect. Annual
resubmissions of either the map or
application would no longer be
required. Growers will only submit an
application and map if they are
participating in the grower diversion
program for the first time. Growers
would need only to submit a new
orchard map if he/she added a new
block of trees or changed the orchard
layout differently from the map
previously submitted to the Board. If a
grower decides not to participate in the
program for a year he/she needs to
inform the Board that he/she is not
participating. This action will slightly
decrease reporting burdens on growers
participating in the grower diversion
program.
Growers who do not file new maps/
applications with the Board would
continue to be eligible for in-orchard
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
16984
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
tank diversion activities. Growers may
use in-orchard tank diversion when
marketable cherries in part of the
orchard have sustained damage or are of
lower quality. Such cherries can be
picked and placed in harvesting tanks
until a compliance officer can come to
the orchard to probe the tanks for
volume measurement and observe the
destruction of the cherries on the
grower’s premises. Each tank holds
about one thousand pounds and each
grower can have no fewer than 10 tanks
for diversion. This keeps the cost of
inspections to a minimum and
decreases the compliance officer’s time
from traveling from location to location
to observe a small amount of in-orchard
tank diversion.
This action also revises provisions to
§ 930.120 for reallocating Board
representation. Currently, § 930.20
allocates producer and handler
representation on the Board based upon
average production of each district in
the production area. When the
production level in a district reaches
various specified thresholds, the
number of representatives from that
district either increases or decreases.
For instance, districts with production
up to and including 10 million pounds
shall have one member; districts with
production greater than 10 million and
up to and including 40 million pounds
shall have 2 members; and districts with
production greater than 40 million
pounds and up to and including 80
million pounds shall have 3 members;
and districts with production greater
than 80 million pounds shall have 4
members.
The Board recommended that in the
event that a district’s three-year average
production decreases to a level
requiring a reduction in membership on
the Board, representation of the district
shall be determined by: (1) Agreement
of the elected members and alternate
members of the specific district; or (2)
if an agreement cannot be reached, the
members and alternates having the
shortest amount of time remaining in
their current term of office would be
removed from the Board. However, the
Board’s recommendation requires
modification.
Because the Secretary of Agriculture
(Secretary) has sole authority to remove
and select persons who can serve on the
Board, it would not be appropriate to
give direct responsibility to current
Board members of a specific district to
determine who is removed from the
Board when production levels decrease.
Accordingly, when a district is faced
with losing Board representation, the
regulations will require the members of
the specific district to make a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Apr 04, 2006
Jkt 208001
recommendation to the Board as to who
should be removed from the Board, and
the Board to then submit its
recommendation to the Secretary for
approval.
In the event a district’s three-year
average production increases such that
it warrants additional seats on the
Board, the seats shall be allocated
following the criteria in § 930.20(b)(5),
and nominated and selected following
the procedures specified in §§ 930.23
and 930.24.
In addition, § 930.158(a) will be
revised to delete obsolete dates that are
currently in that section.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act and
Effects on Small Businesses
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 40 handlers
of tart cherries who are subject to
regulation under the tart cherry
marketing order and approximately 900
producers of tart cherries in the
regulated area. Small agricultural
service firms, which includes handlers,
have been defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $6,000,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as
those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000. A majority of the producers
and handlers of tart cherries under the
order are considered small entities
under SBA’s standards.
The principal demand for tart cherries
is in the form of processed products.
Tart cherries are dried, frozen, canned,
juiced, and pureed. During the period
2000/2001 through 2004/2005,
approximately 93.4 percent of the U.S.
tart cherry crop, or 216.8 million
pounds, was processed annually. Of the
216.8 million pounds of tart cherries
processed, 59 percent was frozen, 28
percent was canned, and 13 percent was
utilized for juice and other products.
Based on National Agricultural
Statistics Service data, acreage in the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
United States devoted to tart cherry
production has been trending
downward. Bearing acreage has
declined from a high of 50,050 acres in
1987/88 to 36,950 acres in 2004/2005.
This represents a 26 percent decrease in
total bearing acres. Michigan leads the
nation in tart cherry acreage with 73
percent of the total and produces about
70 percent of the U.S. tart cherry crop
each year.
This rule removes volume limitations
on market expansion activities used by
handlers in earning diversion credits to
meet their restricted volume obligations;
allows handlers to earn diversion
credits when they voluntarily destroy
finished marketable products that have
been damaged or deteriorated in
condition in some manner to provide
the handlers more flexibility; revises
grower application/mapping procedures
under the grower division program to
make the procedures less burdensome;
and adds a procedure regarding the
reallocation of Board representation to
reflect current district production levels.
These changes to the marketing order
are authorized under §§ 930.62, 930.59,
930.58, and 930.20, respectively.
It is expected that the benefits
resulting from this rulemaking will
impact both small and large handlers
positively by helping them increase
market demand and by improving the
operation of the marketing order. It also
will benefit producers by making the inorchard diversion application/mapping
procedures less burdensome and
improve the operation of the program.
Regarding alternatives, the Board
discussed leaving the provisions
unchanged, but determined that the
changes were a more viable course of
action. The program improvements
expected to result because of these
changes will positively impact
producers and handlers under the
marketing order, regardless of size.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this regulation.
USDA has determined that this action
will have a small impact on the
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements imposed under the tart
cherry marketing order. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
In compliance with Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
regulations (5 CFR part 1320) which
implement the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13), the
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements under the
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
tart cherry marketing order have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB Number 0581–0177. This
rule, which changes procedures for
growers submitting applications and
maps, will result in a slight decrease in
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements on growers who
participate in the voluntary diversion
program. In addition, a slight increase in
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements for handlers who
voluntarily destroy tart cherry products
would be within the current information
collection burden approved by OMB.
Reporting and recordkeeping burdens
are necessary for compliance purposes
and for developing statistical data for
maintenance of the program. The forms
require information which is readily
available from handler records and
which can be provided without data
processing equipment or trained
statistical staff. As with other, similar
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically studied to reduce
or eliminate duplicate information
collection burdens by industry and
public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to compliance
with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires
Government agencies in general to
provide the public the option of
submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible.
This rule invites comments on
administrative changes to the tart cherry
marketing order. Any comments
received will be considered prior to
finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant
matter presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is found
and determined upon good cause that it
is impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to the public interest to give
preliminary notice prior to putting this
rule into effect and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (5
U.S.C. 553) because: (1) Removing the
volume limitations on market expansion
activities relieves restrictions on
handlers and is intended to increase
market demand for tart cherries; (2)
adding authority for the voluntary
destruction of finished tart cherry
products that have deteriorated in
condition provides an additional
opportunity for handlers to receive
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Apr 04, 2006
Jkt 208001
diversion credit in fulfilling their
restricted obligations during the 2005–
2006 crop year, and relieves restrictions
on handlers; (3) adding language to
remove members and alternates from
the Board provides a procedure for
keeping Board membership in line with
current industry production levels; (4)
revising the application and mapping
procedures will decrease reporting
burden on growers and improve the
operation of the grower diversion
program; (5) these actions were
recommended in public meetings and
growers and handlers are aware of these
actions; and (6) this rule provides a 60day comment period and any comments
received will be considered prior to
finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 930
Marketing agreements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Tart
cherries.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 930 is amended as
follows:
I
PART 930—TART CHERRIES GROWN
IN THE STATES OF MICHIGAN, NEW
YORK, PENNSYLVANIA, OREGON,
UTAH, WASHINGTON, AND
WISCONSIN
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 930 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 930.120 is revised to read
as follows:
I
§ 930.120
Board membership.
When the production level from a
district falls below the thresholds stated
in § 930.20(b)(5), members of the
specific district will make a
recommendation to the Board as to who
should be removed from the Board and
the Board shall submit a
recommendation to the Secretary for
approval. If the recommendation is not
made by the Board within a reasonable
time, the Secretary may select the
member and alternate to be removed.
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. In § 930.158, paragraph (b)
introductory text is revised to read as
follows:
§ 930.158 Grower diversion and grower
diversion certificates.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Application and mapping for
diversion. Any grower desiring to divert
cherries using methods other than inorchard tank shall submit a map of the
orchard or orchards to be diverted,
along with a completed Grower Division
Application, to the Board by April 15 of
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16985
each crop year. The application
includes a statement which must be
signed by the grower which states that
the grower agrees to comply with the
regulations established for a tart cherry
diversion program. Each map shall
contain the grower’s name and number
assigned by the Board, the grower’s
address, block name or number when
appropriate, location of orchard or
orchards and other information which
may be necessary to accomplish the
desired diversion. On or before July 1,
the grower should inform the Board of
such grower’s intention to divert inorchard and what type of diversion will
be used. The four types of diversion are
random row diversion, whole block
diversion, partial block diversion and
in-orchard tank diversion. A grower
who informs the Board about the type
of diversion he or she wishes to use by
July 1 can elect to use any diversion
method or combination of diversion
methods. Only in-orchard tank
diversion methods maybe used if the
Board is not so informed by July 1.
Trees that are four years or younger do
not qualify for diversion. Annual
resubmissions of either the map or
application will no longer be required.
Growers will only submit a new
application and map if they are
participating in the grower diversion
program for the first time. Growers will
need only to submit a new orchard map
if he/she adds a new block of trees to
the orchard or changes the orchard
layout differently from the map
previously submitted to the Board. If a
grower decides not to participate in the
program for a year they need to inform
the Board that they are not participating.
*
*
*
*
*
4. In § 930.159, paragraphs (a) and (d)
are revised to read as follows:
I
§ 930.159
Handler diversion.
(a) Methods of diversion. Handlers
may divert cherries by redeeming
grower diversion certificates, by
destroying cherries at handlers’ facilities
(at-plant), by diverting cherry products
accidentally or voluntarily destroyed, by
donating cherries or cherry products to
charitable organizations or by using
cherries or cherry products for exempt
purposes under § 930.162, including
export to countries other than Canada,
and Mexico. Once diversion has taken
place, handlers will receive diversion
certificates stating the weight of cherries
diverted. Diversion credit may be used
to fulfill any restricted percentage
requirement in full or in part. Any
information of a confidential and/or
proprietary nature included in this
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
16986
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
application would be held in confidence
pursuant to § 930.73 of the order.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Diversion of finished products.
Handlers may be granted diversion
credit for finished tart cherry products
that are accidentally destroyed or
voluntarily destroyed by the handler. To
receive diversion credit under this
option the cherry products must be
owned by the handler at the time of
accidental or voluntary destruction, be a
marketable product at the time of
processing, be included in the handler’s
end of the year handler plan, and have
been assigned a Raw Product Equivalent
(RPE) by the handler to determine the
volume of cherries. In addition, the
accidental or voluntary destruction and
disposition of the product must be
verified by either a USDA inspector or
Board agent or employee who witnesses
the disposition of the accidentally or
voluntarily destroyed product. Products
will be considered as accidentally
destroyed if they sustain damage which
renders them unacceptable in normal
market channels. Products which are
voluntarily destroyed must have
deteriorated in condition to such an
extent that they are not acceptable for
use in normal market channels.
*
*
*
*
*
I 5. In § 930.162, paragraphs (b)(1) and
(b)(2) are revised to read as follows:
§ 930.162
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) New product development. This
term includes the development of new
tart cherry products or of foods or other
products in which tart cherries or tart
cherry products are incorporated which
are not presently being produced on a
commercial basis. New product
development can also include the
production or processing of a tart cherry
product using a technique not presently
being utilized commercially in the tart
cherry industry; an end product of the
processing of raw tart cherries done by
the industry at pack time either for
resale or for re-manufacturing which has
not been manufactured previously by
the industry; or a processed, valueadded item that includes tart cherry
products as an ingredient which has
never been marketed to consumers
either by a handler within the industry
or by a food manufacturer. In addition,
the maximum duration of any credit
activity is three years from the first date
of shipment.
(2) New market development and
market expansion. This includes the
development of markets for tart cherry
products which are not commercially
16:22 Apr 04, 2006
Dated: March 30, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–3238 Filed 4–4–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 985
Exemptions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
established markets and which are not
competitive with commercial outlets
presently utilized by the tart cherry
industry (including the development of
new export markets): Provided, That
these markets are a geographic area into
which tart cherries or products derived
from them have not been previously
sold. The term ‘‘market expansion’’,
includes activities that incrementally
expand the sale of either tart cherries or
the products in which tart cherries are
an ingredient, such as, but not limited
to: Expansions of the geographic areas
into which tart cherries or tart cherry
products are marketed; product line
extensions; significant improvements to
or revisions of existing products;
packaging innovations; segmentation of
markets along geographic, demographic,
or other definable characteristics; and
product repositionings.
*
*
*
*
*
Jkt 208001
[Docket No. FV06–985–1 FR]
Marketing Order Regulating the
Handling of Spearmint Oil Produced in
the Far West; Salable Quantities and
Allotment Percentages for the 2006–
2007 Marketing Year
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule establishes the
quantity of spearmint oil produced in
the Far West, by class, that handlers
may purchase from, or handle for,
producers during the 2006–2007
marketing year, which begins on June 1,
2006. This rule establishes salable
quantities and allotment percentages for
Class 1 (Scotch) spearmint oil of
878,205 pounds and 45 percent,
respectively, and for Class 3 (Native)
spearmint oil of 1,007,886 pounds and
46 percent, respectively. The Spearmint
Oil Administrative Committee
(Committee), the agency responsible for
local administration of the marketing
order for spearmint oil produced in the
Far West, recommended these
limitations for the purpose of avoiding
extreme fluctuations in supplies and
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
prices to help maintain stability in the
spearmint oil market.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule
becomes effective June 1, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan M. Hiller, Northwest Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (503) 326–2724; Fax: (503)
326–7440; or George Kelhart, Technical
Advisor, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491; Fax: (202)
720–8938.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 985 (7 CFR part 985), as amended,
regulating the handling of spearmint oil
produced in the Far West (Washington,
Idaho, Oregon, and designated parts of
Nevada and Utah), hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ This order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing
order now in effect, salable quantities
and allotment percentages may be
established for classes of spearmint oil
produced in the Far West. This rule
establishes the quantity of spearmint oil
produced in the Far West, by class,
which may be purchased from or
handled for producers by handlers
during the 2006–2007 marketing year,
which begins on June 1, 2006. This rule
will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16982-16986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3238]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 930
[Docket No. FV06-930-1 IFR]
Tart Cherries Grown in the States of Michigan, et al.; Change in
Certain Provisions/Procedures Under the Handling Regulations for Tart
Cherries
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule removes volume limitations on new product
development, new market development and market expansion activities to
facilitate such activities; allows handlers to receive diversion credit
for the voluntary destruction of finished, marketable products that
have deteriorated in condition to provide handlers more flexibility;
adds a procedure to keep Cherry Industry Administrative Board (Board)
representation in line with current district production levels; and
revises grower application and mapping procedures under the grower
diversion program to make the process less burdensome. These changes
are intended to improve the operation of the marketing order and to
increase the demand for tart cherries and tart cherry products. The
changes were unanimously recommended by the Board, the body that
locally administers the marketing order. The marketing order regulates
the handling of tart cherries grown in the States of Michigan, New
York, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin.
DATES: This rule becomes effective April 6, 2006.
Comments received by June 5, 2006 will be considered prior to
issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: moabdocket.clerk@usda.gov.
Comments should reference the docket number and the date and page
number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be available for
public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours or can be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/
moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia A. Petrella or Kenneth G.
Johnson, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, AMS, USDA, Unit 155, 4700 River Road, Riverdale, MD 20737;
Telephone: (301) 734-5243, or Fax: (301) 734-5275; or George Kelhart,
Technical Advisor, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, or Fax:
(202) 720-8938.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation, or obtain a guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders by contacting Jay
Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-
8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 930 (7 CFR part 930), regulating the handling
of tart cherries produced in the States of Michigan, New York,
Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule. The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court.
Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order
may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of
the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is
not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or
to be exempt therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a
hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States
in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or
her principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review
USDA's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later
than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
Section 930.162 will be changed to remove volume limitations on new
product development, new market development, and market expansion
activities utilized by handlers to earn diversion credits to meet
restricted percentage regulation withholding requirements. Handler
diversion is authorized under Sec. 930.59 of the order and, when
volume regulation is in effect, handlers may fulfill restricted
percentage requirements by diverting cherries or cherry products rather
than placing tart cherries in an inventory reserve. Volume regulation
is intended to help the tart cherry industry stabilize supplies and
prices in years of excess production. Volume regulation percentages are
in effect for the 2005-2006 crop year (71 FR 1915, 1/12/2006).
Section 930.62 provides that the Board, with the approval of the
Secretary, may exempt from the provisions of Sec. Sec. 930.41
(Assessments), 930.44 (Quality control), 930.51 (Issuance of volume
regulations), 930.53 (Modification, suspension, or termination of
regulations), and 930.55 through 930.57 (Reserve regulations) cherries
which are diverted in
[[Page 16983]]
accordance with Sec. 930.59. Cherries that are diverted in accordance
with Sec. 930.59 must be used for new product development and new
market development, used for experimental purposes, or used for any
other purpose designated by the Board, including cherries processed
into products for markets for which less then 5 percent of the
preceding 5-year average production of cherries were utilized.
Section 930.162 specifies procedures for obtaining approval for
exempt uses which include new product development, new market
development, and market expansion. Currently, these provisions specify
volume limitations for these exempt uses. The limitations are specified
in Sec. 930.162(b)(1) which states that once total industry
utilization for a new product exceeds 2 percent of the five year
average production of tart cherries, the product shall no longer be
considered under development and not be eligible for a new product
development exemption. The maximum duration of any new product credit
activity is three years from the first date of shipment.
Section 930.162(b)(2) regarding new market development and market
expansion specifies the annual industry-wide maximum diversion credit
volume at 10 million pounds RPE (Raw Product Equivalent) of cherry
products for all expansion activities which is allocated pro rata among
participating handlers.
When these limitations were added the Board believed that these
markets should be developed slowly. However, it now believes that these
limitations are a disincentive to new product, market development, and
market expansion activities involving large quantities. If a handler's
new product activity involves moving 8 million pounds of exempt tart
cherries, and 2 percent of the 5-year average production is 5 million
pounds, the handler would only receive 5 million pounds of diversion
credit, not 8 million pounds. The Board now believes that this
unnecessarily restricts these handler activities and that handlers
should receive diversion credit for the full diversion amount to
stimulate handler interest and facilitate new product development
activities.
With respect to new market development and market expansion
activities, if the same handler had a pro rata allocation representing
20 percent of the industry-wide 10 million pound limitation for all
handlers participating in these activities, this handler only would
receive diversion credit for 1.6 million pounds, not 8 million pounds.
The Board believes that this provision should be removed to facilitate
handler interest in new market development and market expansion.
To facilitate these activities, the Board recommended that the
volume limitations be removed from paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) to
foster further handler interest in new product, new market development,
and market expansion activities. This is expected to result in an
increase in demand for tart cherries and tart cherry products. The time
limitation for new product development will remain in effect.
As previously stated in this document, handler diversion is
authorized under Sec. 930.59. Section 930.159 of the rules and
regulations under the order allows handlers to divert cherries by
destruction of the cherries at the handler's facility. At-plant
diversion of cherries takes place prior to placing cherries into the
processing line to ensure that the cherries diverted were not simply an
undesirable or unmarketable product of processing. Handlers also can
receive diversion credit for finished, marketable tart cherry products
that were accidentally destroyed. Finished, marketable cherry products
might be accidentally destroyed in a fire, explosion, or because of a
freezer malfunction.
Handlers sometimes voluntarily destroy finished, marketable cherry
products if the cherry products sustain a loss of condition that
renders them unacceptable for use in normal market channels (free
tonnage outlets). To permit handlers to recover some of their costs
incurred in acquiring, processing, and storing such cherries, the Board
unanimously recommended that the at-plant diversion procedures be
broadened so handlers can receive diversion credit for the voluntary
destruction of such cherries. The handler would not have to purchase
additional cherries to meet his/her restricted percentage obligation,
but could simply use the diversion credit received for the voluntarily
destroyed product.
To receive diversion credit under this added option, the Board
recommended that the cherry products meet similar criteria as
accidentally destroyed marketable product. That is, such cherry
products must: (1) Be owned by the handler at the time of the voluntary
destruction; (2) be a marketable product at the time of processing; (3)
be included in the handler's end of year handler plan; and (4) have
been assigned a Raw Product Equivalent (RPE) by the handler to
determine the volume of cherries. In addition, the condition and the
voluntary destruction as well as the disposition of the finished tart
cherry product must be verified by a USDA inspector or a Board agent or
employee.
Handlers wishing to obtain diversion certificates for finished tart
cherry products that are voluntarily destroyed must apply for such
diversion certificates and sign an agreement that disposition of the
destroyed product will take place under the supervision of USDA's
Processed Products Branch inspectors or Board inspectors. This will
allow the Board to verify that the finished product was marketable, but
sustained a loss of condition, and that it was disposed of properly.
Once diversion is satisfactorily accomplished, handlers will
receive diversion certificates from the Board stating the weight of
cherries diverted. Such diversion certificates can be used to satisfy a
handler's restricted percentage obligations.
In years with volume regulation, restricted obligations also can be
met with diversion credits earned through in-orchard diversion. This
action changes the procedures for grower mapping under the grower
diversion program. Currently, under Sec. 930.158 growers must file
maps every year if they intend to participate in the voluntary grower
diversion program. Growers applying for diversion must sign a grower
diversion application which states that the grower agrees to comply
with the regulations established for a tart cherry diversion program.
Each map shall contain the grower's name and number assigned by the
Board, the grower's address, block name or number when appropriate,
location of the orchard or orchards and other information which may be
necessary to accomplish the desired diversion. The Board has
recommended that the original map and application have an ongoing,
continuing effect. Annual resubmissions of either the map or
application would no longer be required. Growers will only submit an
application and map if they are participating in the grower diversion
program for the first time. Growers would need only to submit a new
orchard map if he/she added a new block of trees or changed the orchard
layout differently from the map previously submitted to the Board. If a
grower decides not to participate in the program for a year he/she
needs to inform the Board that he/she is not participating. This action
will slightly decrease reporting burdens on growers participating in
the grower diversion program.
Growers who do not file new maps/applications with the Board would
continue to be eligible for in-orchard
[[Page 16984]]
tank diversion activities. Growers may use in-orchard tank diversion
when marketable cherries in part of the orchard have sustained damage
or are of lower quality. Such cherries can be picked and placed in
harvesting tanks until a compliance officer can come to the orchard to
probe the tanks for volume measurement and observe the destruction of
the cherries on the grower's premises. Each tank holds about one
thousand pounds and each grower can have no fewer than 10 tanks for
diversion. This keeps the cost of inspections to a minimum and
decreases the compliance officer's time from traveling from location to
location to observe a small amount of in-orchard tank diversion.
This action also revises provisions to Sec. 930.120 for
reallocating Board representation. Currently, Sec. 930.20 allocates
producer and handler representation on the Board based upon average
production of each district in the production area. When the production
level in a district reaches various specified thresholds, the number of
representatives from that district either increases or decreases. For
instance, districts with production up to and including 10 million
pounds shall have one member; districts with production greater than 10
million and up to and including 40 million pounds shall have 2 members;
and districts with production greater than 40 million pounds and up to
and including 80 million pounds shall have 3 members; and districts
with production greater than 80 million pounds shall have 4 members.
The Board recommended that in the event that a district's three-
year average production decreases to a level requiring a reduction in
membership on the Board, representation of the district shall be
determined by: (1) Agreement of the elected members and alternate
members of the specific district; or (2) if an agreement cannot be
reached, the members and alternates having the shortest amount of time
remaining in their current term of office would be removed from the
Board. However, the Board's recommendation requires modification.
Because the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) has sole authority
to remove and select persons who can serve on the Board, it would not
be appropriate to give direct responsibility to current Board members
of a specific district to determine who is removed from the Board when
production levels decrease. Accordingly, when a district is faced with
losing Board representation, the regulations will require the members
of the specific district to make a recommendation to the Board as to
who should be removed from the Board, and the Board to then submit its
recommendation to the Secretary for approval.
In the event a district's three-year average production increases
such that it warrants additional seats on the Board, the seats shall be
allocated following the criteria in Sec. 930.20(b)(5), and nominated
and selected following the procedures specified in Sec. Sec. 930.23
and 930.24.
In addition, Sec. 930.158(a) will be revised to delete obsolete
dates that are currently in that section.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act and Effects on Small Businesses
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 40 handlers of tart cherries who are
subject to regulation under the tart cherry marketing order and
approximately 900 producers of tart cherries in the regulated area.
Small agricultural service firms, which includes handlers, have been
defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those
having annual receipts of less than $6,000,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000. A majority of the producers and handlers of tart cherries
under the order are considered small entities under SBA's standards.
The principal demand for tart cherries is in the form of processed
products. Tart cherries are dried, frozen, canned, juiced, and pureed.
During the period 2000/2001 through 2004/2005, approximately 93.4
percent of the U.S. tart cherry crop, or 216.8 million pounds, was
processed annually. Of the 216.8 million pounds of tart cherries
processed, 59 percent was frozen, 28 percent was canned, and 13 percent
was utilized for juice and other products.
Based on National Agricultural Statistics Service data, acreage in
the United States devoted to tart cherry production has been trending
downward. Bearing acreage has declined from a high of 50,050 acres in
1987/88 to 36,950 acres in 2004/2005. This represents a 26 percent
decrease in total bearing acres. Michigan leads the nation in tart
cherry acreage with 73 percent of the total and produces about 70
percent of the U.S. tart cherry crop each year.
This rule removes volume limitations on market expansion activities
used by handlers in earning diversion credits to meet their restricted
volume obligations; allows handlers to earn diversion credits when they
voluntarily destroy finished marketable products that have been damaged
or deteriorated in condition in some manner to provide the handlers
more flexibility; revises grower application/mapping procedures under
the grower division program to make the procedures less burdensome; and
adds a procedure regarding the reallocation of Board representation to
reflect current district production levels. These changes to the
marketing order are authorized under Sec. Sec. 930.62, 930.59, 930.58,
and 930.20, respectively.
It is expected that the benefits resulting from this rulemaking
will impact both small and large handlers positively by helping them
increase market demand and by improving the operation of the marketing
order. It also will benefit producers by making the in-orchard
diversion application/mapping procedures less burdensome and improve
the operation of the program.
Regarding alternatives, the Board discussed leaving the provisions
unchanged, but determined that the changes were a more viable course of
action. The program improvements expected to result because of these
changes will positively impact producers and handlers under the
marketing order, regardless of size.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this regulation.
USDA has determined that this action will have a small impact on
the reporting and recordkeeping requirements imposed under the tart
cherry marketing order. As with all Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
In compliance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
regulations (5 CFR part 1320) which implement the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13), the information collection and
recordkeeping requirements under the
[[Page 16985]]
tart cherry marketing order have been previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB Number 0581-0177. This rule, which changes procedures for
growers submitting applications and maps, will result in a slight
decrease in reporting and recordkeeping requirements on growers who
participate in the voluntary diversion program. In addition, a slight
increase in reporting and recordkeeping requirements for handlers who
voluntarily destroy tart cherry products would be within the current
information collection burden approved by OMB.
Reporting and recordkeeping burdens are necessary for compliance
purposes and for developing statistical data for maintenance of the
program. The forms require information which is readily available from
handler records and which can be provided without data processing
equipment or trained statistical staff. As with other, similar
marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically studied to
reduce or eliminate duplicate information collection burdens by
industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to compliance with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires Government agencies in general
to provide the public the option of submitting information or
transacting business electronically to the maximum extent possible.
This rule invites comments on administrative changes to the tart
cherry marketing order. Any comments received will be considered prior
to finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the
information and recommendation submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is found and determined upon good
cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into
effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date
of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register (5
U.S.C. 553) because: (1) Removing the volume limitations on market
expansion activities relieves restrictions on handlers and is intended
to increase market demand for tart cherries; (2) adding authority for
the voluntary destruction of finished tart cherry products that have
deteriorated in condition provides an additional opportunity for
handlers to receive diversion credit in fulfilling their restricted
obligations during the 2005-2006 crop year, and relieves restrictions
on handlers; (3) adding language to remove members and alternates from
the Board provides a procedure for keeping Board membership in line
with current industry production levels; (4) revising the application
and mapping procedures will decrease reporting burden on growers and
improve the operation of the grower diversion program; (5) these
actions were recommended in public meetings and growers and handlers
are aware of these actions; and (6) this rule provides a 60-day comment
period and any comments received will be considered prior to
finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 930
Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Tart cherries.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 930 is amended as
follows:
PART 930--TART CHERRIES GROWN IN THE STATES OF MICHIGAN, NEW YORK,
PENNSYLVANIA, OREGON, UTAH, WASHINGTON, AND WISCONSIN
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 930 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 930.120 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 930.120 Board membership.
When the production level from a district falls below the
thresholds stated in Sec. 930.20(b)(5), members of the specific
district will make a recommendation to the Board as to who should be
removed from the Board and the Board shall submit a recommendation to
the Secretary for approval. If the recommendation is not made by the
Board within a reasonable time, the Secretary may select the member and
alternate to be removed.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 930.158, paragraph (b) introductory text is revised to read
as follows:
Sec. 930.158 Grower diversion and grower diversion certificates.
* * * * *
(b) Application and mapping for diversion. Any grower desiring to
divert cherries using methods other than in-orchard tank shall submit a
map of the orchard or orchards to be diverted, along with a completed
Grower Division Application, to the Board by April 15 of each crop
year. The application includes a statement which must be signed by the
grower which states that the grower agrees to comply with the
regulations established for a tart cherry diversion program. Each map
shall contain the grower's name and number assigned by the Board, the
grower's address, block name or number when appropriate, location of
orchard or orchards and other information which may be necessary to
accomplish the desired diversion. On or before July 1, the grower
should inform the Board of such grower's intention to divert in-orchard
and what type of diversion will be used. The four types of diversion
are random row diversion, whole block diversion, partial block
diversion and in-orchard tank diversion. A grower who informs the Board
about the type of diversion he or she wishes to use by July 1 can elect
to use any diversion method or combination of diversion methods. Only
in-orchard tank diversion methods maybe used if the Board is not so
informed by July 1. Trees that are four years or younger do not qualify
for diversion. Annual resubmissions of either the map or application
will no longer be required. Growers will only submit a new application
and map if they are participating in the grower diversion program for
the first time. Growers will need only to submit a new orchard map if
he/she adds a new block of trees to the orchard or changes the orchard
layout differently from the map previously submitted to the Board. If a
grower decides not to participate in the program for a year they need
to inform the Board that they are not participating.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 930.159, paragraphs (a) and (d) are revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 930.159 Handler diversion.
(a) Methods of diversion. Handlers may divert cherries by redeeming
grower diversion certificates, by destroying cherries at handlers'
facilities (at-plant), by diverting cherry products accidentally or
voluntarily destroyed, by donating cherries or cherry products to
charitable organizations or by using cherries or cherry products for
exempt purposes under Sec. 930.162, including export to countries
other than Canada, and Mexico. Once diversion has taken place, handlers
will receive diversion certificates stating the weight of cherries
diverted. Diversion credit may be used to fulfill any restricted
percentage requirement in full or in part. Any information of a
confidential and/or proprietary nature included in this
[[Page 16986]]
application would be held in confidence pursuant to Sec. 930.73 of the
order.
* * * * *
(d) Diversion of finished products. Handlers may be granted
diversion credit for finished tart cherry products that are
accidentally destroyed or voluntarily destroyed by the handler. To
receive diversion credit under this option the cherry products must be
owned by the handler at the time of accidental or voluntary
destruction, be a marketable product at the time of processing, be
included in the handler's end of the year handler plan, and have been
assigned a Raw Product Equivalent (RPE) by the handler to determine the
volume of cherries. In addition, the accidental or voluntary
destruction and disposition of the product must be verified by either a
USDA inspector or Board agent or employee who witnesses the disposition
of the accidentally or voluntarily destroyed product. Products will be
considered as accidentally destroyed if they sustain damage which
renders them unacceptable in normal market channels. Products which are
voluntarily destroyed must have deteriorated in condition to such an
extent that they are not acceptable for use in normal market channels.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 930.162, paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) are revised to read
as follows:
Sec. 930.162 Exemptions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) New product development. This term includes the development of
new tart cherry products or of foods or other products in which tart
cherries or tart cherry products are incorporated which are not
presently being produced on a commercial basis. New product development
can also include the production or processing of a tart cherry product
using a technique not presently being utilized commercially in the tart
cherry industry; an end product of the processing of raw tart cherries
done by the industry at pack time either for resale or for re-
manufacturing which has not been manufactured previously by the
industry; or a processed, value-added item that includes tart cherry
products as an ingredient which has never been marketed to consumers
either by a handler within the industry or by a food manufacturer. In
addition, the maximum duration of any credit activity is three years
from the first date of shipment.
(2) New market development and market expansion. This includes the
development of markets for tart cherry products which are not
commercially established markets and which are not competitive with
commercial outlets presently utilized by the tart cherry industry
(including the development of new export markets): Provided, That these
markets are a geographic area into which tart cherries or products
derived from them have not been previously sold. The term ``market
expansion'', includes activities that incrementally expand the sale of
either tart cherries or the products in which tart cherries are an
ingredient, such as, but not limited to: Expansions of the geographic
areas into which tart cherries or tart cherry products are marketed;
product line extensions; significant improvements to or revisions of
existing products; packaging innovations; segmentation of markets along
geographic, demographic, or other definable characteristics; and
product repositionings.
* * * * *
Dated: March 30, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 06-3238 Filed 4-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P