Radio Broadcasting Services; Clayton, Ruston, Saint Joseph, and Wisner, LA, 17032 [06-3200]

Download as PDF 17032 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows: 47 CFR Part 73 I [DA 06–523, MM Docket Nos. 01–19 and 01–27, RM–10048, RM–10027, RM–10056, and RM–10118] Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. § 73.202 [Amended] 2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Arkansas, is amended by adding Hermitage, Channel 300A. I 3. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under California, is amended by adding Wasco, Channel 224A. I 4. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Oklahoma, is amended by adding Waynoka, Channel 231C2. I 5. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Texas, is amended by adding Channel 299A at Richland Springs, Texas. I 6. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Wisconsin, is amended by adding Channel 265C3 at Tomahawk. I Federal Communications Commission. John A. Karousos, Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. [FR Doc. 06–3160 Filed 4–4–06; 8:45 am] rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES BILLING CODE 6712–01–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:22 Apr 04, 2006 Jkt 208001 Radio Broadcasting Services; Clayton, Ruston, Saint Joseph, and Wisner, LA Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Final rule; petition for reconsideration, denial. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The staff denied a petition for reconsideration filed by Communications Capital Company II of Louisiana, LLC, of a Report and Order in this proceeding, which had dismissed its counterproposal. The staff determined that the reconsideration petition did not demonstrate any errors of fact or law and that the counterproposal was properly dismissed as an impermissibly contingent proposal. See also SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau, (202) 418–2180. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission’s Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM Docket Nos. 01–19 and 01–27, adopted PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 March 15, 2006, and released March 17, 2006. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY–A257), 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission’s copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20054, telephone 1– 800–378–3160 or https:// www.BCPIWEB.com. The staff also found that the counterproposal was untimely under longstanding precedent and could have been dismissed on that ground in the Report and Order. See 68 FR 3819 (January 27, 2003). This document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. (The Commission, is, therefore, not required to submit a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to GAO, pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the petition for reconsideration was denied.) Federal Communications Commission. John A. Karousos, Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. [FR Doc. 06–3200 Filed 4–4–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM 05APR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 17032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3200]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 06-523, MM Docket Nos. 01-19 and 01-27, RM-10048, RM-10027, RM-
10056, and RM-10118]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Clayton, Ruston, Saint Joseph, and 
Wisner, LA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; petition for reconsideration, denial.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The staff denied a petition for reconsideration filed by 
Communications Capital Company II of Louisiana, LLC, of a Report and 
Order in this proceeding, which had dismissed its counterproposal. The 
staff determined that the reconsideration petition did not demonstrate 
any errors of fact or law and that the counterproposal was properly 
dismissed as an impermissibly contingent proposal. See also 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM Docket Nos. 01-19 and 01-27, adopted 
March 15, 2006, and released March 17, 2006. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-
A257), 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this 
decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, 
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 
CY-B402, Washington, DC 20054, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or https://
www.BCPIWEB.com.
    The staff also found that the counterproposal was untimely under 
longstanding precedent and could have been dismissed on that ground in 
the Report and Order. See 68 FR 3819 (January 27, 2003).
    This document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. (The 
Commission, is, therefore, not required to submit a copy of this 
Memorandum Opinion and Order to GAO, pursuant to the Congressional 
Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the petition for 
reconsideration was denied.)

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 06-3200 Filed 4-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.