Civil Rights Division; Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested, 16592-16593 [06-1937]
Download as PDF
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
16592
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 63 / Monday, April 3, 2006 / Notices
calendar year 2005 (report quantity data
in pounds and value data in U.S.
dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/
worker group or trade/business
association, provide the information, on
an aggregate basis, for the firms in
which your workers are employed/
which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total U.S. production of the Domestic
Like Product accounted for by your
firm’s(s’) production;
(b) the quantity and value of U.S.
commercial shipments of the Domestic
Like Product produced in your U.S.
plant(s); and
(c) the quantity and value of U.S.
internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s).
(8) If you are a U.S. importer or a
trade/business association of U.S.
importers of the Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Countries, provide the
following information on your firm’s(s’)
operations on that product during
calendar year 2005 (report quantity data
in pounds and value data in U.S.
dollars). If you are a trade/business
association, provide the information, on
an aggregate basis, for the firms which
are members of your association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed,
duty-paid but not including
antidumping duties) of U.S. imports
and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. imports of
Subject Merchandise from each Subject
Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’)
imports;
(b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping duties) of
U.S. commercial shipments of Subject
Merchandise imported from each
Subject Country; and
(c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping duties) of
U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of Subject Merchandise
imported from each Subject Country.
(9) If you are a producer, an exporter,
or a trade/business association of
producers or exporters of the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Countries,
provide the following information on
your firm’s(s’) operations on that
product during calendar year 2005
(report quantity data in pounds and
value data in U.S. dollars, landed and
duty-paid at the U.S. port but not
including antidumping duties). If you
are a trade/business association, provide
the information, on an aggregate basis,
for the firms which are members of your
association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total production of Subject Merchandise
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:30 Mar 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
in each Subject Country accounted for
by your firm’s(s’) production; and
(b) the quantity and value of your
firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of
Subject Merchandise and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total
exports to the United States of Subject
Merchandise from each Subject Country
accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports.
(10) Identify significant changes, if
any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the
Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the
market for the Subject Merchandise in
the Subject Countries since the Order
Date, and significant changes, if any,
that are likely to occur within a
reasonably foreseeable time. Supply
conditions to consider include
technology; production methods;
development efforts; ability to increase
production (including the shift of
production facilities used for other
products and the use, cost, or
availability of major inputs into
production); and factors related to the
ability to shift supply among different
national markets (including barriers to
importation in foreign markets or
changes in market demand abroad).
Demand conditions to consider include
end uses and applications; the existence
and availability of substitute products;
and the level of competition among the
Domestic Like Product produced in the
United States, Subject Merchandise
produced in the Subject Countries, and
such merchandise from other countries.
(11) (Optional) A statement of
whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product
and Domestic Industry; if you disagree
with either or both of these definitions,
please explain why and provide
alternative definitions.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s
rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 27, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–4641 Filed 3–31–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
[USITC SE–06–022]
United
States International Trade Commission.
TIME AND DATE: April 6, 2006 at 11 a.m.
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Room 101, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, Telephone:
(202) 205–2000.
STATUS: Open to the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Agenda for future meetings: none.
2. Minutes.
3. Ratification List.
4. Inv. Nos. 731–TA–846–850 (Review)
(Carbon and Alloy Seamless
Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe
from the Czech Republic, Japan,
Mexico, Romania, and South
Africa)—briefing and vote. (The
Commission is currently scheduled
to transmit its determination and
Commissioners’ opinions to the
Secretary of Commerce on or before
April 26, 2006.)
5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
In accordance with Commission
policy, subject matter listed above, not
disposed of at the scheduled meeting,
may be carried over to the agenda of the
following meeting.
PLACE:
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 29, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06–3214 Filed 3–30–06; 1:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Civil Rights Division; Agency
Information Collection Activities:
Proposed Collection; Comments
Requested
30-Day notice of information
collection under review; procedures for
the Administration of Section 5 of the
Voting Rights Act of 1965.
ACTION:
The Department of Justice (DOJ), Civil
Rights Division (CFT) has submitted the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed
information collection is published to
obtain comments from the public and
affected agencies. This proposed
information collection was previously
published in the Federal Register
Volume 70, Number 226, page 71171 on
November 25, 2005, allowing for a 60
day comment period.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
for an additional 30 days for public
comment until May 3, 2006. This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10.
Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this
notice, especially the estimated public
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 63 / Monday, April 3, 2006 / Notices
burden and associated response time,
should be directed to the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention Department of Justice Desk
Officer, Washington, DC 20503.
Additionally, comments may be
submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202)
395–5806. Written comments and
suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed
collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Procedures for the Administration of
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of
1965.
(3) None. Civil Rights Division.
(4) Affected Public: State, Local, or
Tribal Governments
Brief Abstract: Jurisdictions covered
under the Voting Rights Act may request
preclearance from the Attorney General
(AG) before instituting changes affecting
voting. They must convince the
Attorney General that voting changes
are not racially discriminatory.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond/reply: It is estimated that it will
take 10,103 respondents under the
Procedures for the Administration of
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of
1965 approximately 47,365 burden
hours to complete the submission of
voting changes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:30 Mar 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The total estimated annual
burden hours to complete the
submission of voting changes is 47,365
hours.
If additional information is required
contact: Robert B. Briggs, Clearance
Officer, United States Department of
Justice, Justice Management Division,
Policy and Planning Staff, Patrick Henry
Building, Suite 1600, D Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: February 27, 2006.
Robert B. Briggs,
Clearance Officer, Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 06–1937 Filed 3–31–06 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 04–8]
Wedgewood Village Pharmacy;
Revocation of Registration
On September 8, 2003, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator of the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA)
issued an Order to Show Cause to
Wedgewood Village Pharmacy in
Sewell, New Jersey. The Order to Show
Cause proposed to revoke the DEA
Certificate of Registration AW1289126,
issued to Wedgewood Village Pharmacy
as a retail pharmacy and deny any
pending applications for renewal of
such registration. The Order alleged that
the continued registration of the
pharmacy would be inconsistent with
the public interest as that term is
defined in 21 U.S.C. 823(f).
The Order to Show Cause specifically
alleged that Wedgewood Village
Pharmacy was not acting as a traditional
retail pharmacy but, was holding itself
out as a compounding pharmacy that
manufactured controlled substances
without a DEA registration, in violation
of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA)
and provisions of the Federal Food Drug
and Cosmetic Act (FD&C). It also alleged
that the pharmacy was distributing
controlled substances and listed
chemicals without being registered with
DEA to conduct those activities. The
Order to Show Cause further alleged
that a DEA investigation of the
pharmacy determined that the
pharmacy was not maintaining
complete and accurate records and
inventories of the controlled substances
that it handled, and was unable to
accurately account for the bulk
controlled substances and listed
chemicals it had received.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16593
By letter dated October 16, 2003, the
pharmacy, through counsel, requested a
hearing in the matter. On October 21,
2003, the pharmacy submitted a written
request to the DEA requesting a
modification of its registration to a new
location in Swedesboro, New Jersey.
DEA responded to the pharmacy’s
request via letter dated October 27,
2003, informing the pharmacy that their
requested address change constituted a
modification of the registration and
would be considered as part of the
matters considered at the hearing on the
Order to Show Cause.
On November 5, 2003, Wedgewood
Village Pharmacy filed a motion for a
temporary restraining order (TRO) in the
United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey seeking to enjoin
DEA from denying its request to change
location pending the hearing on the
Order to Show Cause. The District Court
denied the TRO on November 7, 2003,
and further denied a Motion for
Preliminary Injunction on December 15,
2003, concluding that Wedgewood did
not meet its burden of proving all the
elements required for a preliminary
injunction including that, ‘‘Wedgewood
is unlikely to succeed on the merits of
the case.’’ Wedgewood Village
Pharmacy v. Ashcroft, 293 F.Supp.2d
462, 474 (D.N.J. 2003).
The hearing on the Order to Show
Cause was held at the DEA
Headquarters in Arlington, Virginia, on
January 26–28, 2004, before a DEA
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). No
witnesses were called to testify at the
hearing by either party. However,
documentary evidence was submitted
by both the Agency and Respondent and
admitted into the record by the ALJ.
The ALJ issued her Recommended
Rulings, Findings of Fact, Conclusions
of Law, and Decision of the
Administrative Law Judge on March 4,
2005. The Respondent filed exceptions
to the ALJ’s Recommended Rulings on
April 29, 2005. The record was
transmitted by the ALJ to the DEA
Deputy Administrator on May 18, 2005.
The Deputy Administrator has
reviewed the Recommended Rulings,
Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law,
and Decision of the Administrative Law
Judge, the Respondent’s Exceptions to
the Recommended Rulings, and the
record in this matter. The Deputy
Administrator hereby adopts the
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law of the Administrative Law Judge.
The ALJ concluded that the agency had
clearly met its burden of proof,
demonstrating that Respondent’s
continued registration with DEA is
inconsistent with the public interest.
The Deputy Administrator concurs with
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 63 (Monday, April 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16592-16593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-1937]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Civil Rights Division; Agency Information Collection Activities:
Proposed Collection; Comments Requested
ACTION: 30-Day notice of information collection under review;
procedures for the Administration of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act
of 1965.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department of Justice (DOJ), Civil Rights Division (CFT) has
submitted the following information collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information
collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected
agencies. This proposed information collection was previously published
in the Federal Register Volume 70, Number 226, page 71171 on November
25, 2005, allowing for a 60 day comment period.
The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days
for public comment until May 3, 2006. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained
in this notice, especially the estimated public
[[Page 16593]]
burden and associated response time, should be directed to the Office
of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503.
Additionally, comments may be submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202)
395-5806. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following
four points:
--Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
--Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Overview of This Information Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection: Extension of a currently
approved collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: Procedures for the Administration
of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
(3) None. Civil Rights Division.
(4) Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal Governments
Brief Abstract: Jurisdictions covered under the Voting Rights Act
may request preclearance from the Attorney General (AG) before
instituting changes affecting voting. They must convince the Attorney
General that voting changes are not racially discriminatory.
(5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond/reply: It is
estimated that it will take 10,103 respondents under the Procedures for
the Administration of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
approximately 47,365 burden hours to complete the submission of voting
changes.
(6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection: The total estimated annual burden hours to
complete the submission of voting changes is 47,365 hours.
If additional information is required contact: Robert B. Briggs,
Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building,
Suite 1600, D Street NW., Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: February 27, 2006.
Robert B. Briggs,
Clearance Officer, Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 06-1937 Filed 3-31-06 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-M