Colorado River Reservoir Operations: Development of Lower Basin Shortage Guidelines and Coordinated Management Strategies for Lake Powell and Lake Mead, Particularly Under Low Reservoir Conditions, 16341-16344 [E6-4713]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2006 / Notices
respondents will be available for public
review at the Ely Field Office during
regular business hours 7:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. Individual respondents may
request confidentiality. If you wish to
withhold your name and address from
public review or disclosure under the
Freedom of Information Act, you must
state this prominently at the beginning
of your comments. Such requests will be
honored to the extent allowed by law.
All submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or business, will be made
available for public inspection in their
entirety.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Penny Woods, BLM Nevada State
Office, (775) 861–6466. You may also
contact Ms Woods to have your name
added to the EIS mailing list.
The LCLA
Groundwater Development Project is
being proposed by the Lincoln County
Water District (LCWD) and would be
located in southeastern Lincoln County.
The proposed project would develop
and convey groundwater in the Tule
Desert and Clover Valley hydrographic
basins to land recently sold by the BLM
that is approximately 2 miles north of
Mesquite, Nevada. This private land
comprises the LCLA development area
and consists of approximately 13,000
acres. The volume of water to be
transported through the proposed
facilities would be approximately
23,824 acre-feet per year. The water
would be used to support development
in the LCLA development area.
The proposed facilities include
approximately 8 groundwater
production wells (16 inch diameter)
located in the Tule Desert and Clover
Valley hydrographic basins, a 23-mile
long water transmission pipeline (24
inch diameter), and lateral pipelines (12
inch diameter) to connect the
transmission pipeline to the
productions wells. The proposed width
of the right-of-way for the transmission
pipeline would be 30 feet with a
temporary width of 60 feet during
construction. The proposed width of the
right-of-way for the lateral pipelines
would be 20 feet with a temporary
width of 60 feet during construction.
The productions well site rights-of-way
would be 100 feet × 100 feet with a
temporary construction area of 100 feet
× 200 feet. Access roads approximately
12 feet in width would be needed from
existing roads in the Tule Desert area to
each well site.
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Mar 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
The proposed production wells would
be located in the well field area
authorized for the Toquop Energy
Project, which is a 1100 MW gas-fired
power plant. The proposed transmission
pipeline would follow the same
alignment as the approved water
pipeline for the power plant. From the
power plant, the transmission pipeline
would proceed to the LCLA
development area.
Electric lines, communication lines,
and a natural gas pipeline would be
located within the proposed
transmission pipeline right-of-way. A
pipeline bringing reclaimed water from
the LCLA development area to the
already authorized Toquop Energy
Project site would also be in the
proposed right-of-way.
The facilities would be located within
and/or across the following public lands
north of Mesquite, Nevada:
Mount Diablo Meridian
Tps. 6 to 12 S., Rgs. 69 and 71 E., various
sections.
A map of the proposed project is
available for viewing at the Bureau of
Land Management, Ely Field Office, 702
North Industrial Way, Ely NV 89301.
Dated: March 21, 2006.
Amy Lueders,
Associate State Director, Nevada.
[FR Doc. 06–2932 Filed 3–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Proposed National Natural
Landmark Designation for the Irvine
Ranch Land Reserve, CA
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of proposed National
Natural Landmark designation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Park Service has
evaluated and determined that the
Irvine Ranch Land Reserve, located
forty-five miles south of downtown Los
Angeles, in Orange County, California
appears to meet the criteria for national
significance and proposes to
recommend the site for designation as a
National Natural Landmark. The public
is invited to comment on this
recommendation. The proposal will be
considered by the National Park System
Advisory Board at a meeting to be held
on June 8, 2006 at Zion National Park,
in the Majestic View Lodge, 2400 Zion
Park Blvd., Springdale, Utah.
DATES: Written comments will be
accepted until May 30, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16341
Written comments should
be sent to Steve Gibbons, National
Natural Landmarks Coordinator, North
Cascades National Park, 810 State Route
20, Sedro Woolley, Washington 98284,
or to his Internet address:
Steve_Gibbons@nps.gov.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Gibbons at 360–856–5700,
extension 306.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Irvine
Ranch Land Reserve represents
significant biological resources of
Mediterranean shrublands, including
extensive areas of chaparral and coastal
sage scrub associations. These chaparral
and coastal sage scrub areas present one
of the largest extant areas of this
association remaining in the South
Pacific Border Province. It is the
presence of these large and relative
undisturbed ecosystems and their
inherent biological diversity that
provide the uniqueness of this area. In
commensurate with its biological
significance the Irvine Ranch Land
Reserve geologically represents a
remarkably unique, long time-range
stratigraphic succession that shows the
linkage between tectonic framework,
provenances, sedimentology,
paleoenvironments, paleontology,
paleoclimate, landscape evolution and
geologic history. In this regard it is not
only outstanding, but represents one of
the most critical time intervals and
locations in the evolution of the South
Pacific Border Province.
Information on the National Natural
Landmarks Program can be found in 36
CFR Part 62 or on the Internet at
https://www.nature.nps.gov/nnl.
Dated: March 28, 2006.
Fran Mainella,
Director, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 06–3161 Filed 3–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–HJ–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Colorado River Reservoir Operations:
Development of Lower Basin Shortage
Guidelines and Coordinated
Management Strategies for Lake
Powell and Lake Mead, Particularly
Under Low Reservoir Conditions
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of public availability of
a Scoping Summary Report on the
development of Lower Basin shortage
guidelines and coordinated management
strategies for the operation of Lake
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
16342
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2006 / Notices
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
Powell and Lake Mead, particularly
under low reservoir conditions.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended, and the Council on
Environmental Quality’s Regulations for
Implementing the Procedural Provisions
of NEPA, the Department of the Interior
(Department) has issued a Scoping
Summary Report on the development of
Lower Basin shortage guidelines and
coordinated management strategies for
the operation of Lake Powell and Lake
Mead, particularly under low reservoir
conditions. The Scoping Summary
Report provides a summary of the issues
raised during the scoping process and
describes the Department’s current
assessment of the proposed scope of the
environmental analysis to be included
in the draft environmental impact
statement (EIS). The Department
anticipates that the Draft EIS will be
published in December 2006. The report
also includes a summary of the issues
raised and comments received during
the scoping process. Among other
things, the report identifies how the
Department anticipates addressing these
issues.
Dates and Addresses: The Department
will accept, review, and incorporate, as
appropriate, any additional public
comments on the information contained
in the Scoping Summary Report as part
of the development of the Draft EIS,
which the Department anticipates will
be published in December 2006. The
Department would prefer that any such
comments be received by May 1, 2006,
in order to allow full consideration
during the development of the Draft EIS.
Send written comments to: Regional
Director, Bureau of Reclamation, Lower
Colorado Region, Attention: BCOO–
1000, P.O. Box 61470, Boulder City,
Nevada 89006–1470; faxogram at (702)
293–8156; or e-mail at
strategies@lc.usbr.gov.
The Scoping Summary Report is
available on the Bureau of
Reclamation’s Web site at https://
www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/
strategies/. If you would like
a printed copy of the report, please
contact Nan Yoder at telephone (702)
293–8500; facsimile (702) 293–8156; email: strategies@lc.usbr.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terrance J. Fulp, Ph.D., at (702) 293–
8500 or e-mail at strategies@lc.usbr.gov;
and/or Randall Peterson at (801) 524–
3633 or e-mail at strategies@lc.usbr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department is publishing the Scoping
Summary Report as a voluntary effort to
assist in public understanding of this
important process. Based upon
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Mar 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
information presented in the report and
all information submitted to the
Department as part of this process, the
Department is now undertaking
preparation of a Draft EIS.
Proposed Federal Action
The Bureau of Reclamation, acting on
behalf of the Secretary of the Interior
(Secretary), proposes to take action to
adopt specific Colorado River Lower
Basin shortage guidelines and
coordinated reservoir management
strategies to address operations of Lake
Powell and Lake Mead, particularly
under low reservoir conditions. This
action will provide a greater degree of
certainty to all water users and
managers in the Colorado River Basin by
providing more detailed objective
guidelines for the operation of Lake
Powell and Lake Mead and by allowing
water users in the Lower Basin to know
when, and by how much, water
deliveries will be reduced in drought
and other low reservoir conditions. In
addition, this action is designed to delay
the onset and magnitude of shortages
and maximize the protection afforded to
water supply, hydropower production,
recreation, and environmental benefits
by water storage in Lakes Powell and
Mead. As a result of analysis of
comments and public input received to
date, the Department anticipates that the
elements of the proposed action will
include:
(1) Adoption of guidelines that will
identify those circumstances under
which the Secretary would reduce the
annual amount of water available for
consumptive use from Lake Mead to the
Lower Division states (Arizona,
California, and Nevada) below 7.5
million acre-feet (maf) (a ‘‘Shortage’’)
pursuant to Article II(B)(3) of the
Supreme Court Decree in Arizona v.
California; 1
(2) adoption of guidelines for the
coordinated operation of Lake Powell
and Lake Mead that are designed to
provide improved operation of the two
reservoirs, particularly under low
reservoir conditions;
(3) adoption of guidelines for the
storage and delivery of water in Lake
Mead to increase the flexibility to meet
water use needs from Lake Mead,
particularly under low reservoir
conditions. These guidelines are
anticipated to address the storage and
delivery of non-system water,
1 The Department intends to meet any
consultation requirements identified in Article
II(B)(3) of the Supreme Court Decree in Arizona v.
California through the ongoing NEPA process
initiated by the Federal Register Notice of
September 30, 2005 (70 FR 57322–57323).
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
exchanges, and water conserved by
extraordinary measures; and
(4) modification of the substance and
term of the existing Interim Surplus
Guidelines, published in the Federal
Register on January 25, 2001 (66 FR
7772–7782), from 2016 to coincide with
the proposed new guidelines described
above.
The Secretary proposes that these
guidelines will be interim in nature and
will extend through 2025. Adoption of
new guidelines along with modification
of existing operational guidelines for a
consistent interim period will provide
the opportunity to gain valuable
experience for operating the reservoirs
under the modified operations and
should improve the basis for making
additional future operational decisions,
whether during the interim period or
thereafter.
It is the intent of the Department to
adopt and implement the above
proposed action in a manner that is
consistent with applicable Federal law,2
and further, in a manner that does not
require any additional statutory
authorization. In this regard,
Reclamation proposes to implement the
proposed action consistent with the
Colorado River Compact of 1922, the
Decree entered by the United States
Supreme Court in the case of Arizona v.
California, and other provisions of
applicable Federal law. It is the intent
of the Department that the proposed
action will be consistent with and
provide implementing guidance that
would be used each year by the
Department in implementing the
Criteria for Coordinated Long-Range
Operation of Colorado River Reservoirs
Pursuant to the Colorado River Basin
Project Act of September 30, 1968
(Long-Range Operating Criteria or
LROC).
Purpose and Need for the Proposed
Federal Action
The purpose of the proposed action is
to adopt additional operational
strategies to improve the Department’s
annual management and operation of
key Colorado River reservoirs while also
providing mainstream users of Colorado
River water, particularly those in the
Lower Division states of Arizona,
California, and Nevada, a greater degree
2 The treaties, compacts, decrees, statutes,
regulations, contracts, and other legal documents
and agreements applicable to the allocation,
appropriation, development, exportation, and
management of the waters of the Colorado River
Basin are often referred to as the ‘‘Law of the
River.’’ There is no single, universally-agreed upon
definition of the ‘‘Law of the River,’’ but it is useful
as a shorthand reference to describe this
longstanding and complex body of legal agreements
governing the Colorado River.
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2006 / Notices
of predictability with respect to the
amount of annual water deliveries in
future years, particularly under low
reservoir conditions.
The need for the proposed action is
based on a number of important
considerations including the following
reasons:
• The Colorado River flows through
the driest portion of the continental
United States and is the primary source
of water to a region that has experienced
continued population growth over
recent decades.
• The Colorado River is of strategic
importance in the southwestern United
States for water supply, hydropower
production, flood control, recreation,
fish and wildlife habitat, and other
benefits. In addition, the United States
has a delivery obligation to the Republic
of Mexico for certain waters of the
Colorado River pursuant to the 1944
U.S.-Mexico Water Treaty.
• The Colorado River Basin
experienced the worst five-year drought
in recorded history in 2000 through
2004. This drought has impacted system
storage, while demands for Colorado
River water supplies have continued to
increase. During the period from
October 1, 1999, to October 1, 2004,
storage in Lakes Powell and Mead fell
from 47.6 maf (approximately 95% of
capacity) to 23.1 maf (approximately
46% of capacity). This drought was also
the worst sustained drought
experienced in the Colorado River Basin
at a time when all major storage
facilities were in place, and when use
by the Lower Division states met or
exceeded the annual ‘‘normal’’
apportionment of 7.5 maf pursuant to
Article II(B)(1) of the Decree. Moreover,
entering the five year drought period
with Lake Powell and Lake Mead
reservoir storage capacity at 95%
fortuitously provided for sufficient
water supplies to meet basin demands.
This may not be the case in the future.
Among other factors, these conditions
led the Department to conclude that
additional management guidelines are
necessary and desirable for the efficient,
and coordinated, management of the
major mainstem Colorado River
reservoirs.
• In the future, low reservoir
conditions will likely not be limited to
drought periods because of anticipated
future demands on Colorado River water
supplies. Projected future increases in
Colorado River water demands are
expected to increase the frequency and
magnitude that Colorado River
reservoirs are drawn down to low
reservoir conditions.
• As a result of actual operating
experience and through reviews of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Mar 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
LROC and preparation of Annual
Operating Plans, particularly during
recent drought years, the Secretary has
determined a need for more specific
guidelines, consistent with the Decree
and other applicable provisions of
Federal law, to assist in the Secretary’s
determination of annual water supply
conditions in the Lower Basin. The
increased level of predictability is
needed by the entities that receive
Colorado River water to better plan for
and manage available water supplies,
and to allow such entities to better
integrate the use of Colorado River
water with other water supplies that
they rely on. To date, storage of water
and flows in the Colorado River Basin
have been sufficient so that it has not
been necessary to reduce Lake Mead
annual releases below 7.5 maf; nor has
the Department yet identified when
water supplies would be reduced, by
how much, or who would experience
specified reductions.
• After public consultation meetings
held in the summer of 2005, the
Secretary has also determined the
desirability of developing additional
operational guidelines that will provide
for releases greater than or less than 8.23
maf from Lake Powell.
• To further enhance this coordinated
reservoir approach, the Secretary has
also determined a need for guidelines
that provide water users with the
opportunity to conserve, store, and take
delivery of water in and from Lake
Mead for the purposes of enhancing
existing water supplies, particularly
under low reservoir conditions.
• Lastly, the Secretary has
determined the need to modify and
extend the Interim Surplus Guidelines
to coincide with the duration of the
proposed new guidelines. This will
provide an integrated approach for
reservoir management and more
predictability for future Colorado River
Basin water supplies.
Results of Scoping Input
The description of the Proposed
Federal Action and the Purpose and
Need for the Proposed Federal Action
described in this Notice and in the
Scoping Summary Report available at
Reclamation’s Web site noted above,
was refined to reflect information and
comments received during the scoping
meetings and in written and oral
scoping comments submitted to the
Department.3 The Proposed Federal
Action has been crafted to reflect,
3 The Scoping Summary Report also addresses in
Section 5.0 those issues raised during scoping that
have been determined to be beyond the proposed
scope of the EIS.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16343
among others, three important
considerations that were identified by
commentors:
(1) Importance of Encouraging
Conservation of Water: Many comments
submitted to the Department focused on
the importance of encouraging and
utilizing water conservation as an
important tool to better manage limited
water supplies and therefore minimize
the likelihood and severity of potential
future shortages. See e.g., comment G–
0003, ‘‘Conservation Before Shortage’’
proposal submitted to the Department
on July 18, 2005, which is available in
its entirety in Appendix W of the
Scoping Summary Report. Water
conservation can occur through a
number of approaches that will be
identified in the Draft EIS, including:
Extraordinary conservation, forbearance,
financial incentives to maximize
conservation, dry-year options, and
associated storage and recovery
methodologies and procedures to
address conservation actions by
particular parties.
(2) Importance of Consideration of
Reservoir Operations at all Operational
Levels: Comments submitted to the
Department urged the Department to
consider and analyze management and
operational guidelines for the full range
of operational levels at Lake Powell and
Lake Mead. See e.g., comment S–2006,
‘‘Basin States’ Preliminary Proposal
Regarding Colorado River Interim
Operations’’ submitted to the
Department on February 3, 2006, which
is available in its entirety in Appendix
Q of the Scoping Summary Report. It
was suggested that this approach is
integral to the prudent development of
new low-reservoir operational
guidelines, as the approach and
management of these reservoirs at
higher elevations has a direct impact on
available storage, thereby affecting the
likelihood and severity of potential
future shortages.
(3) Term of Operational Guidelines:
Comments submitted to the Department
urged the Department to consider
interim, rather than permanent,
additional operational guidelines. See
e.g., comment letters L–2002 through
2006 submitted to the Department by
several Arizona municipalities which
are available in their entirety in
Appendix W of the Scoping Summary
Report. In this manner, the Department
would have the ability to use actual
operating experience for a period of
years, thereby facilitating a better
understanding of the operational effects
of the new guidelines; modifications
would then be made, if necessary,
during or preferably at the end of the
interim period. In particular, the
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
16344
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2006 / Notices
Department was also urged to consider
adopting additional operational
guidelines for both low and higher
reservoir elevations for a consistent
period of years. At this time, it is
important to note, the Department has
detailed operational guidelines for
declaration of surplus conditions at
higher elevations of Lake Mead through
2016, but does not have similar detailed
operational guidelines for either Lake
Powell or the lower operational levels of
Lake Mead.
Public Disclosure
Written comments, including names
and home addresses of respondents,
will be made available for public
review. Individual respondents may
request that their home address be
withheld from public disclosure, which
will be honored to the extent allowable
by law. There may be circumstances in
which respondents’ identity may also be
withheld from public disclosure, as
allowable by law. If you wish to have
your name and/or address withheld,
you must state this prominently at the
beginning of your comment. All
submissions from organizations,
business, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
made available for public disclosure in
their entirety.
Dated: March 18, 2006.
Robert W. Johnson,
Regional Director, Lower Colorado Region,
Bureau of Reclamation.
Dated: March 16, 2006.
Rick L. Gold,
Regional Director, Upper Colorado Region,
Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. E6–4713 Filed 3–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection for 1029–0025, 1029–0040
and 1029–0104
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement (OSM) is announcing
its intention to request renewed
approval for the collections of
information for 30 CFR 733,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Mar 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
Maintenance of state programs and
procedures for substituting federal
enforcement of state programs and
withdrawing approval of state programs;
785, Requirements for permits for
special categories of mining; and 876,
Acid mine drainage treatment and
abatement program.
DATES: Comments on the proposed
information collection activities must be
received by May 30, 2006, to be assured
of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to
John A. Trelease, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
1951 Constitution Ave., NW., Room
202—SIB, Washington, DC 20240.
Comments may also be submitted
electronically to jtreleas@osmre.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request a copy of the information
collection request, explanatory
information and related forms, contact
John A. Trelease, at (202) 208–2783 or
via e-mail at the address listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which
implement provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13),
require that interested members of the
public and affected agencies have an
opportunity to comment on information
collection and recordkeeping activities
[see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)]. This notice
identifies information collections that
OSM will be submitting to OMB for
approval. These collections are
contained in (1) 30 CFR 733,
Maintenance of state programs and
procedures for substituting federal
enforcement of state programs and
withdrawing approval of state programs;
(2) 30 CFR 785, Requirements for
permits for special categories of mining;
and (3) 30 CFR 876, Acid mine drainage
treatment and abatement program. OSM
will request a 3-year term of approval
for each information collection activity.
Comments are invited on: (1) The
need for the collection of information
for the performance of the functions of
the agency; (2) the accuracy of the
agency’s burden estimates; (3) ways to
enhance the quality, utility and clarity
of the information collection; and (4)
ways to minimize the information
collection burden on respondents, such
as use of automated means of collection
of the information. A summary of the
public comments will accompany
OSM’s submission of the information
collection request to OMB.
The following information is provided
for the information collection: (1) Title
of the information collection; (2) OMB
control number; (3) summary of the
information collection activity; and (4)
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
frequency of collection, description of
the respondents, estimated total annual
responses, and the total annual
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
the collection of information.
Title: Maintenance of state programs
and procedures for substituting federal
enforcement of state programs and
withdrawing approval of state programs,
30 CFR 733.
OMB Control Number: 1029–0025.
Summary: This part provides that any
interested person may request the
Director of OSM to evaluate a State
program by setting forth in the request
a concise statement of facts that the
person believes establishes the need for
the evaluation.
Bureau Form Number: None.
Frequency of Collection: Once.
Description of Respondents: Any
interested person (individuals,
businesses, institutions, organizations).
Total Annual Responses: 1.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 100.
Title: Requirements for permits for
special categories of mining, 30 CFR
785.
OMB Control Number: 1029–0040.
Summary: The information is being
collected to meet the requirements of
section 507, 508, 510, 515, 701 and 711
of Public Law 95–87, which requires
applicants for special types of mining
activities to provide descriptions, maps,
plans and data of the proposed activity.
This information will be used by the
regulatory authority in determining if
the applicant can meet the applicable
performance standards for the special
type of mining activity.
Bureau Form Number: None.
Frequency of Collection: Once.
Description of Respondents:
Applicants for coalmine permits and
State Regulatory Authorities.
Total Annual Responses: 228.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 16,146.
Title: Acid mine drainage treatment
and abatement program, 30 CFR 876.
OMB Control Number: 1029–0104.
Summary: This part establishes the
requirements and procedures allowing
states and Indian tribes to establish acid
mine drainage abatement and treatment
programs under the Abandoned Mine
Land fund as directed through Public
Law 101–508.
Bureau Form Number: None.
Frequency of Collection: Once.
Description of Respondents: State
governments and Indian tribes.
Total Annual Responses: 1.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 350.
Dated: March 27, 2006.
Kathryn S. O’Toole,
Acting Chief, Division of Regulatory Support.
[FR Doc. 06–3130 Filed 3–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–M
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16341-16344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-4713]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Colorado River Reservoir Operations: Development of Lower Basin
Shortage Guidelines and Coordinated Management Strategies for Lake
Powell and Lake Mead, Particularly Under Low Reservoir Conditions
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of public availability of a Scoping Summary Report on
the development of Lower Basin shortage guidelines and coordinated
management strategies for the operation of Lake
[[Page 16342]]
Powell and Lake Mead, particularly under low reservoir conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended, and the Council on Environmental Quality's
Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA, the
Department of the Interior (Department) has issued a Scoping Summary
Report on the development of Lower Basin shortage guidelines and
coordinated management strategies for the operation of Lake Powell and
Lake Mead, particularly under low reservoir conditions. The Scoping
Summary Report provides a summary of the issues raised during the
scoping process and describes the Department's current assessment of
the proposed scope of the environmental analysis to be included in the
draft environmental impact statement (EIS). The Department anticipates
that the Draft EIS will be published in December 2006. The report also
includes a summary of the issues raised and comments received during
the scoping process. Among other things, the report identifies how the
Department anticipates addressing these issues.
Dates and Addresses: The Department will accept, review, and
incorporate, as appropriate, any additional public comments on the
information contained in the Scoping Summary Report as part of the
development of the Draft EIS, which the Department anticipates will be
published in December 2006. The Department would prefer that any such
comments be received by May 1, 2006, in order to allow full
consideration during the development of the Draft EIS. Send written
comments to: Regional Director, Bureau of Reclamation, Lower Colorado
Region, Attention: BCOO-1000, P.O. Box 61470, Boulder City, Nevada
89006-1470; faxogram at (702) 293-8156; or e-mail at
strategies@lc.usbr.gov.
The Scoping Summary Report is available on the Bureau of
Reclamation's Web site at https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/
strategies/. If you would like a printed copy of the report,
please contact Nan Yoder at telephone (702) 293-8500; facsimile (702)
293-8156; e-mail: strategies@lc.usbr.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terrance J. Fulp, Ph.D., at (702) 293-
8500 or e-mail at strategies@lc.usbr.gov; and/or Randall Peterson at
(801) 524-3633 or e-mail at strategies@lc.usbr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department is publishing the Scoping
Summary Report as a voluntary effort to assist in public understanding
of this important process. Based upon information presented in the
report and all information submitted to the Department as part of this
process, the Department is now undertaking preparation of a Draft EIS.
Proposed Federal Action
The Bureau of Reclamation, acting on behalf of the Secretary of the
Interior (Secretary), proposes to take action to adopt specific
Colorado River Lower Basin shortage guidelines and coordinated
reservoir management strategies to address operations of Lake Powell
and Lake Mead, particularly under low reservoir conditions. This action
will provide a greater degree of certainty to all water users and
managers in the Colorado River Basin by providing more detailed
objective guidelines for the operation of Lake Powell and Lake Mead and
by allowing water users in the Lower Basin to know when, and by how
much, water deliveries will be reduced in drought and other low
reservoir conditions. In addition, this action is designed to delay the
onset and magnitude of shortages and maximize the protection afforded
to water supply, hydropower production, recreation, and environmental
benefits by water storage in Lakes Powell and Mead. As a result of
analysis of comments and public input received to date, the Department
anticipates that the elements of the proposed action will include:
(1) Adoption of guidelines that will identify those circumstances
under which the Secretary would reduce the annual amount of water
available for consumptive use from Lake Mead to the Lower Division
states (Arizona, California, and Nevada) below 7.5 million acre-feet
(maf) (a ``Shortage'') pursuant to Article II(B)(3) of the Supreme
Court Decree in Arizona v. California; \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Department intends to meet any consultation requirements
identified in Article II(B)(3) of the Supreme Court Decree in
Arizona v. California through the ongoing NEPA process initiated by
the Federal Register Notice of September 30, 2005 (70 FR 57322-
57323).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) adoption of guidelines for the coordinated operation of Lake
Powell and Lake Mead that are designed to provide improved operation of
the two reservoirs, particularly under low reservoir conditions;
(3) adoption of guidelines for the storage and delivery of water in
Lake Mead to increase the flexibility to meet water use needs from Lake
Mead, particularly under low reservoir conditions. These guidelines are
anticipated to address the storage and delivery of non-system water,
exchanges, and water conserved by extraordinary measures; and
(4) modification of the substance and term of the existing Interim
Surplus Guidelines, published in the Federal Register on January 25,
2001 (66 FR 7772-7782), from 2016 to coincide with the proposed new
guidelines described above.
The Secretary proposes that these guidelines will be interim in
nature and will extend through 2025. Adoption of new guidelines along
with modification of existing operational guidelines for a consistent
interim period will provide the opportunity to gain valuable experience
for operating the reservoirs under the modified operations and should
improve the basis for making additional future operational decisions,
whether during the interim period or thereafter.
It is the intent of the Department to adopt and implement the above
proposed action in a manner that is consistent with applicable Federal
law,\2\ and further, in a manner that does not require any additional
statutory authorization. In this regard, Reclamation proposes to
implement the proposed action consistent with the Colorado River
Compact of 1922, the Decree entered by the United States Supreme Court
in the case of Arizona v. California, and other provisions of
applicable Federal law. It is the intent of the Department that the
proposed action will be consistent with and provide implementing
guidance that would be used each year by the Department in implementing
the Criteria for Coordinated Long-Range Operation of Colorado River
Reservoirs Pursuant to the Colorado River Basin Project Act of
September 30, 1968 (Long-Range Operating Criteria or LROC).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The treaties, compacts, decrees, statutes, regulations,
contracts, and other legal documents and agreements applicable to
the allocation, appropriation, development, exportation, and
management of the waters of the Colorado River Basin are often
referred to as the ``Law of the River.'' There is no single,
universally-agreed upon definition of the ``Law of the River,'' but
it is useful as a shorthand reference to describe this longstanding
and complex body of legal agreements governing the Colorado River.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Purpose and Need for the Proposed Federal Action
The purpose of the proposed action is to adopt additional
operational strategies to improve the Department's annual management
and operation of key Colorado River reservoirs while also providing
mainstream users of Colorado River water, particularly those in the
Lower Division states of Arizona, California, and Nevada, a greater
degree
[[Page 16343]]
of predictability with respect to the amount of annual water deliveries
in future years, particularly under low reservoir conditions.
The need for the proposed action is based on a number of important
considerations including the following reasons:
The Colorado River flows through the driest portion of the
continental United States and is the primary source of water to a
region that has experienced continued population growth over recent
decades.
The Colorado River is of strategic importance in the
southwestern United States for water supply, hydropower production,
flood control, recreation, fish and wildlife habitat, and other
benefits. In addition, the United States has a delivery obligation to
the Republic of Mexico for certain waters of the Colorado River
pursuant to the 1944 U.S.-Mexico Water Treaty.
The Colorado River Basin experienced the worst five-year
drought in recorded history in 2000 through 2004. This drought has
impacted system storage, while demands for Colorado River water
supplies have continued to increase. During the period from October 1,
1999, to October 1, 2004, storage in Lakes Powell and Mead fell from
47.6 maf (approximately 95% of capacity) to 23.1 maf (approximately 46%
of capacity). This drought was also the worst sustained drought
experienced in the Colorado River Basin at a time when all major
storage facilities were in place, and when use by the Lower Division
states met or exceeded the annual ``normal'' apportionment of 7.5 maf
pursuant to Article II(B)(1) of the Decree. Moreover, entering the five
year drought period with Lake Powell and Lake Mead reservoir storage
capacity at 95% fortuitously provided for sufficient water supplies to
meet basin demands. This may not be the case in the future. Among other
factors, these conditions led the Department to conclude that
additional management guidelines are necessary and desirable for the
efficient, and coordinated, management of the major mainstem Colorado
River reservoirs.
In the future, low reservoir conditions will likely not be
limited to drought periods because of anticipated future demands on
Colorado River water supplies. Projected future increases in Colorado
River water demands are expected to increase the frequency and
magnitude that Colorado River reservoirs are drawn down to low
reservoir conditions.
As a result of actual operating experience and through
reviews of the LROC and preparation of Annual Operating Plans,
particularly during recent drought years, the Secretary has determined
a need for more specific guidelines, consistent with the Decree and
other applicable provisions of Federal law, to assist in the
Secretary's determination of annual water supply conditions in the
Lower Basin. The increased level of predictability is needed by the
entities that receive Colorado River water to better plan for and
manage available water supplies, and to allow such entities to better
integrate the use of Colorado River water with other water supplies
that they rely on. To date, storage of water and flows in the Colorado
River Basin have been sufficient so that it has not been necessary to
reduce Lake Mead annual releases below 7.5 maf; nor has the Department
yet identified when water supplies would be reduced, by how much, or
who would experience specified reductions.
After public consultation meetings held in the summer of
2005, the Secretary has also determined the desirability of developing
additional operational guidelines that will provide for releases
greater than or less than 8.23 maf from Lake Powell.
To further enhance this coordinated reservoir approach,
the Secretary has also determined a need for guidelines that provide
water users with the opportunity to conserve, store, and take delivery
of water in and from Lake Mead for the purposes of enhancing existing
water supplies, particularly under low reservoir conditions.
Lastly, the Secretary has determined the need to modify
and extend the Interim Surplus Guidelines to coincide with the duration
of the proposed new guidelines. This will provide an integrated
approach for reservoir management and more predictability for future
Colorado River Basin water supplies.
Results of Scoping Input
The description of the Proposed Federal Action and the Purpose and
Need for the Proposed Federal Action described in this Notice and in
the Scoping Summary Report available at Reclamation's Web site noted
above, was refined to reflect information and comments received during
the scoping meetings and in written and oral scoping comments submitted
to the Department.\3\ The Proposed Federal Action has been crafted to
reflect, among others, three important considerations that were
identified by commentors:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Scoping Summary Report also addresses in Section 5.0
those issues raised during scoping that have been determined to be
beyond the proposed scope of the EIS. 10
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Importance of Encouraging Conservation of Water: Many comments
submitted to the Department focused on the importance of encouraging
and utilizing water conservation as an important tool to better manage
limited water supplies and therefore minimize the likelihood and
severity of potential future shortages. See e.g., comment G-0003,
``Conservation Before Shortage'' proposal submitted to the Department
on July 18, 2005, which is available in its entirety in Appendix W of
the Scoping Summary Report. Water conservation can occur through a
number of approaches that will be identified in the Draft EIS,
including: Extraordinary conservation, forbearance, financial
incentives to maximize conservation, dry-year options, and associated
storage and recovery methodologies and procedures to address
conservation actions by particular parties.
(2) Importance of Consideration of Reservoir Operations at all
Operational Levels: Comments submitted to the Department urged the
Department to consider and analyze management and operational
guidelines for the full range of operational levels at Lake Powell and
Lake Mead. See e.g., comment S-2006, ``Basin States' Preliminary
Proposal Regarding Colorado River Interim Operations'' submitted to the
Department on February 3, 2006, which is available in its entirety in
Appendix Q of the Scoping Summary Report. It was suggested that this
approach is integral to the prudent development of new low-reservoir
operational guidelines, as the approach and management of these
reservoirs at higher elevations has a direct impact on available
storage, thereby affecting the likelihood and severity of potential
future shortages.
(3) Term of Operational Guidelines: Comments submitted to the
Department urged the Department to consider interim, rather than
permanent, additional operational guidelines. See e.g., comment letters
L-2002 through 2006 submitted to the Department by several Arizona
municipalities which are available in their entirety in Appendix W of
the Scoping Summary Report. In this manner, the Department would have
the ability to use actual operating experience for a period of years,
thereby facilitating a better understanding of the operational effects
of the new guidelines; modifications would then be made, if necessary,
during or preferably at the end of the interim period. In particular,
the
[[Page 16344]]
Department was also urged to consider adopting additional operational
guidelines for both low and higher reservoir elevations for a
consistent period of years. At this time, it is important to note, the
Department has detailed operational guidelines for declaration of
surplus conditions at higher elevations of Lake Mead through 2016, but
does not have similar detailed operational guidelines for either Lake
Powell or the lower operational levels of Lake Mead.
Public Disclosure
Written comments, including names and home addresses of
respondents, will be made available for public review. Individual
respondents may request that their home address be withheld from public
disclosure, which will be honored to the extent allowable by law. There
may be circumstances in which respondents' identity may also be
withheld from public disclosure, as allowable by law. If you wish to
have your name and/or address withheld, you must state this prominently
at the beginning of your comment. All submissions from organizations,
business, and from individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, will be
made available for public disclosure in their entirety.
Dated: March 18, 2006.
Robert W. Johnson,
Regional Director, Lower Colorado Region, Bureau of Reclamation.
Dated: March 16, 2006.
Rick L. Gold,
Regional Director, Upper Colorado Region, Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. E6-4713 Filed 3-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P