Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Elliott Bay Seawall, WA, 16293-16294 [06-3140]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2006 / Notices
‘‘Article of Footwear with Temperature
Regulation Means’’ issued March 21,
2006. This patent has been assigned to
the United States Government as
represented by the Secretary of the
Army.
Mr.
Arnold Boucher at U.S. Army Soldier
Systems Center, Kansas Street, Natick,
MA 01760, Phone: (508) 233–5431 or E–
mail: Arnold.Boucher@natick.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any
licenses granted shall comply with 35
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR part 404.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–3142 Filed 3–30–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Availability of a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement To Consider
Issuance of a Department of the Army
Permit Pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act for Mingo Logan Coal
Company’s (Mingo Logan) Proposal To
Construct and Operate Spruce No. 1
Mine, Near Blair in Logan County, WV
Department of the Army; Corps
of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice.
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Huntington District, in cooperation with
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the
Office of Surface Mining and the West
Virginia Department of Environmental
Protection, has prepared a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS).
This DEIS evaluates potential impacts to
the natural, physical and human
environment as a result of the proposed
mining activities associated with Mingo
Logan Coal Company’s (Mingo Logan)
Spruce No. 1 Mine. The USACE
regulates this proposed project pursuant
to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
The proposed activity would involve
the discharge of dredged and fill
material into waters of the United States
associated with the proosed
construction and operation of a surface
bituminous coal mine.
DATES: Submit comments by May 15,
2006. A public hearing regarding this
DEIS will be held May 1, 2006 (see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
16:35 Mar 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
Mrs.
Teresa Spagna, Regulatory Project
Manager at (304) 399–5710 or electronic
mail at Teresa.D.Spagna@
Lrh01.usace.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Discharges
of dredged and fill material into the
waters of the United States are regulated
under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act, with the permitting responsibility
administered by the USACE. The
proposed project must also address
environmental impacts relative to the
Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act,
Endangered Species Act and the Fish
and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA).
In accordance with the NEPA, the DEIS
evaluates reasonable alternatives for the
USACE’s decision making process. As
required by NEPA, the USACE also
analyzes the ‘‘no action’’ alternative as
a baseline for gauging potential impacts.
As part of the public involvement
process, notice is hereby given by the
USACE-Huntington District of a Public
Hearing to be held at the Earl Ray
Tomlin Convention Center, in
Chapmanville, Logan County, WV, from
7 to 10 p.m. on May 1, 2006. The Public
Hearing will allow participants the
opportunity to comment on the DEIS
prepared for the proposed Spruce No. 1
Mine project.
The comments are due 45 days from
the date of publication of this notice.
Copies of the document may be
obtained by contacting USACE
Huntington District Regulatory Branch
at 304–399–5210 or 304–399–5710.
Copies of the Draft EIS are also
available for inspection at the locations
identified below:
(1) Blair Post Office, P.O. Box 9998,
Blair, WV 25022–9998.
(2) Kanawha County Public Library,
123 Capital Street, Charleston, WV
25301.
(3) Logan County Public Library, 16
Wildcat Way, Logan, WV 25601.
After the public comment period
ends, USACE will consider all
comments received, revise the DEIS as
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 3710–08–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Send written comments and
suggestions concerning this proposal to
Mrs. Teresa Spagna, Regulatory Project
Manager, Regulatory Branch, CELRH–
OR–FS, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Huntington District, 502 8th Street,
Huntington, WV 25701. Telephone (304)
399–5710 or electronic mail at Teresa.D.
Spagna@Lrh01.usace.army.mil.
Requests to be placed on the mailing list
should also be sent to this address.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16293
appropriate, and issue a Final
Environmental Impact Statement.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–3144 Filed 3–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–GM–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
Elliott Bay Seawall, WA
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) for a proposed seawall
rehabilitation project along the Elliott
Bay shoreline in Seattle, WA. The
seawall, known as the Alaskan Way
Seawall, is experiencing significant
decay and deterioration, leading to
structural instability along the Seattle
waterfront and central business district.
Seawall structural instability is putting
a tremendous amount of public and
private infrastructure, development, and
transportation linkages at risk of damage
due to wave and tidal erosion, and
hence potential for undermining and
collapse. In addition, the failure of the
seawall would result in a high risk to
public safety and substantial
environmental degradation. The
purpose of the proposed rehabilitation
effort is to protect the public facilities
and economic activities along the Elliott
Bay shoreline from storm damages
associated with failure of the existing
seawall.
DATES: Submit comments on the scope
of issues to be addressed in the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
by April 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments
concerning this notice to Ms. Aimee
Kinney, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Seattle District, Environmental
Resources Section, PO Box 3755,
Seattle, WA 98124–3755. Submit
electronic comments and other date to
aimee.t.kinney@usace.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding the scoping process
or preparation of the DEIS may be
directed to Ms. Aimee Kinney,
telephone (206) 764–3634, e-mail
aimee.t.kinney@usace.army.mil.
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
16294
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2006 / Notices
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Proposed Action: The Alaskan Way
Seawall extends for a distance of
approximately 7900 feet along Seattle’s
central waterfront, between Washington
Street to the south and Bay Street to the
north. The proposed action would
involve an extensive structural rebuild
or replacement of the seawall in order
to reduce damage resulting from storms
and erosion. The proposed action is
closely related to the proposed
replacement of the State Route (SR) 99
Alaskan Way Viaduct, which runs
parallel to a portion of the seawall. The
SR 99 Alaskan Way Viaduct and
Seawall Replacement Project Draft
Environmental Impact Statement
(AWVSRP DEIS) was issued by the U.S.
Department of Transportation Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA),
Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT), and City of
Seattle on April 9, 2004 (69 FR 18898).
The AWVSRP DEIS evaluated the
rebuilding of the Alaskan Way Seawall
because it is essential to the function of
transportation facilities and is at risk of
collapsing in a large earthquake. The
geographic area covered in the AWVSRP
DEIS is virtually the same as the Corps
study area. However, the Corps’ EIS will
evaluate the seawall from a storm
damage reduction perspective; the
seawall will be the primary focus of the
analysis rather than a secondary project
element, as in the AMVSRP DEIS. The
Corps is reviewing the existing body of
work and coordinating closely with the
city of Seattle, FHWA, and WSDOT to
incorporate all relevant material from
their NEPA efforts, share information,
and reduce duplication of efforts.
2. Alternatives: There are currently
four alternatives which will receive
consideration in the EIS: (1) The no
action alternative; (2) construction of a
vertical face wall with structural frame;
(3) construction of a drilled shaft wall
with soil improvements; and (4)
replacing the portion of the seawall
adjacent to the Alaskan Way viaduct
with the outer wall of the new tunnel
identified as the preferred alternative for
the AWVSRP. These alternatives are the
same as the rebuild, frame, and tunnel
wall seawall alternatives evaluated in
the AWVSRP DEIS. The development of
seawall study alternatives has been and
will continue to be closely coordinated
with the AWVSRP through the City of
Seattle, WSDOT, and FHWA. The
selection of the Corps tunnel wall
alternative could not occur unless
FHWA signed a record of decision for
the AWVSRP selecting the tunnel
alternative. Opportunities will be sought
to incorporate measures for
improvement of habitat values, as well
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Mar 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
as recreation and public access. Public
input is specifically invited regarding
the reasonableness of the build
alternatives and whether any additional
alternatives are appropriate for
consideration.
3. Scoping and Public Involvement:
This notice of intent formally
commences the scoping process under
NEPA. As part of the scoping process,
all affected Federal, State and local
agencies, Native American Tribes,
private organizations, and the public are
invited to comment on the scope of the
EIS. To date, the following issues of
concern have been identified for in
depth analysis in the draft EIS: (1)
Construction impacts, particularly those
related to noise, water quality,
transportation, and effects to businesses
and residences within/adjacent to the
construction zone; (2) impacts
associated with potential deviation of
the existing seawall alignment; and (3)
potential impacts to historical
properties.
4. Scoping Meetings: Two public
Scoping meetings will be held to
identify issues of major concern,
identify studies that might be needed in
order to analyze and evaluate impacts,
and obtain public input on the range
and acceptability of alternatives. Both
meetings will be conducted on April 18,
2006 in the Lopez Room at Seattle
Center, 305 Harrison Street, Seattle, WA
98109. The first meeting will be held
from 1 to 3:30 p.m. An informal open
house will be held between 1 and 2 p.m.
A brief presentation will be made
between 2 and 2:30 p.m. Then
testimony will be taken between 2:30
and 3:30 p.m. The second meeting will
be held from 4:30 to 7 p.m. Another
informal open house will be held
between 4:30 and 5:30 p.m. The
presentation will be made again
between 5:30 and 6 p.m. Then
testimony will be taken between 6 and
7 p.m. Verbal or written comments will
be accepted at the Scoping meetings, or
written comments may be sent by
regular or electronic mail to Aimee
Kinney (see ADDRESSES). Ongoing
communication with agencies, Native
American tribes, public interest groups,
and interested citizens will take place
throughout the EIS development
through the use of public meetings,
mailings, and the Internet. Additional
meetings will be scheduled upon
completion of the DEIS.
5. Other Environmental Review,
Coordination and Permit Requirements:
The environmental review process will
be comprehensive and will integrate
and satisfy the requirements of NEPA,
and other relevant Federal, State and
local environmental laws. Other
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
environmental review, coordination,
and permit requirements may include
preparation of a Clean Water Act,
Section 404 evaluation by the Corps.
Dated: March 17, 2006.
Debra M. Lewis,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, District
Commander.
[FR Doc. 06–3140 Filed 3–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–ER–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft Supplement
to the Environmental Impact Statement
To Evaluate Construction of
Authorized Improvements to the
Federal Gulfport Harbor Navigation
Project in Harrison County, MS
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Mobile District, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps),
intends to prepare a Draft Supplement
to the Environmental Impact Statement
(DSEIS) to address the potential impacts
associated with construction of
authorized improvements to the Federal
Gulfport Harbor Navigation Project in
Harrison County, MS. The DSEIS will be
used as a basis for ensuring compliance
with the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) and evaluating the
following two alternative plans: ‘‘No
Action’’ and widening to the authorized
project dimensions. Gulfport Harbor is
authorized to (a) A channel 38 feet deep
by 400 feet wide and about 8 miles long
across Ship Island Bar; (b) a channel 36
feet deep by 300 feet wide and about 12
miles long through Mississippi Sound;
and (c) a stepped anchorage basin at
Gulfport Harbor 32 to 36 feet deep by
1,120 feet wide and 2,640 feet long.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about the proposed action
and the DSEIS should be addressed to
Dr. Susan Ivester Rees, Coastal
Environment Team, Mobile District,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box
2288, Mobile, AL 36628 by telephone
(251) 694–4141 or e-mail her at
susan.i.rees@sam.usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Gulfport Harbor is located in
Harrison County, MS, on Mississippi
Sound about equidistant (80 miles) from
New Orleans, LA, and Mobile, AL. The
existing project was adopted by the
River and Harbor Act approved July 3,
1930 (House Document Number 692,
69th. Congress, 2nd. Session) and the
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16293-16294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3140]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for
Elliott Bay Seawall, WA
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) for a
proposed seawall rehabilitation project along the Elliott Bay shoreline
in Seattle, WA. The seawall, known as the Alaskan Way Seawall, is
experiencing significant decay and deterioration, leading to structural
instability along the Seattle waterfront and central business district.
Seawall structural instability is putting a tremendous amount of public
and private infrastructure, development, and transportation linkages at
risk of damage due to wave and tidal erosion, and hence potential for
undermining and collapse. In addition, the failure of the seawall would
result in a high risk to public safety and substantial environmental
degradation. The purpose of the proposed rehabilitation effort is to
protect the public facilities and economic activities along the Elliott
Bay shoreline from storm damages associated with failure of the
existing seawall.
DATES: Submit comments on the scope of issues to be addressed in the
Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) by April 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this notice to Ms. Aimee
Kinney, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Environmental
Resources Section, PO Box 3755, Seattle, WA 98124-3755. Submit
electronic comments and other date to aimee.t.kinney@usace.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the scoping
process or preparation of the DEIS may be directed to Ms. Aimee Kinney,
telephone (206) 764-3634, e-mail aimee.t.kinney@usace.army.mil.
[[Page 16294]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Proposed Action: The Alaskan Way Seawall extends for a distance
of approximately 7900 feet along Seattle's central waterfront, between
Washington Street to the south and Bay Street to the north. The
proposed action would involve an extensive structural rebuild or
replacement of the seawall in order to reduce damage resulting from
storms and erosion. The proposed action is closely related to the
proposed replacement of the State Route (SR) 99 Alaskan Way Viaduct,
which runs parallel to a portion of the seawall. The SR 99 Alaskan Way
Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Project Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (AWVSRP DEIS) was issued by the U.S. Department of
Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and City of Seattle on April 9,
2004 (69 FR 18898). The AWVSRP DEIS evaluated the rebuilding of the
Alaskan Way Seawall because it is essential to the function of
transportation facilities and is at risk of collapsing in a large
earthquake. The geographic area covered in the AWVSRP DEIS is virtually
the same as the Corps study area. However, the Corps' EIS will evaluate
the seawall from a storm damage reduction perspective; the seawall will
be the primary focus of the analysis rather than a secondary project
element, as in the AMVSRP DEIS. The Corps is reviewing the existing
body of work and coordinating closely with the city of Seattle, FHWA,
and WSDOT to incorporate all relevant material from their NEPA efforts,
share information, and reduce duplication of efforts.
2. Alternatives: There are currently four alternatives which will
receive consideration in the EIS: (1) The no action alternative; (2)
construction of a vertical face wall with structural frame; (3)
construction of a drilled shaft wall with soil improvements; and (4)
replacing the portion of the seawall adjacent to the Alaskan Way
viaduct with the outer wall of the new tunnel identified as the
preferred alternative for the AWVSRP. These alternatives are the same
as the rebuild, frame, and tunnel wall seawall alternatives evaluated
in the AWVSRP DEIS. The development of seawall study alternatives has
been and will continue to be closely coordinated with the AWVSRP
through the City of Seattle, WSDOT, and FHWA. The selection of the
Corps tunnel wall alternative could not occur unless FHWA signed a
record of decision for the AWVSRP selecting the tunnel alternative.
Opportunities will be sought to incorporate measures for improvement of
habitat values, as well as recreation and public access. Public input
is specifically invited regarding the reasonableness of the build
alternatives and whether any additional alternatives are appropriate
for consideration.
3. Scoping and Public Involvement: This notice of intent formally
commences the scoping process under NEPA. As part of the scoping
process, all affected Federal, State and local agencies, Native
American Tribes, private organizations, and the public are invited to
comment on the scope of the EIS. To date, the following issues of
concern have been identified for in depth analysis in the draft EIS:
(1) Construction impacts, particularly those related to noise, water
quality, transportation, and effects to businesses and residences
within/adjacent to the construction zone; (2) impacts associated with
potential deviation of the existing seawall alignment; and (3)
potential impacts to historical properties.
4. Scoping Meetings: Two public Scoping meetings will be held to
identify issues of major concern, identify studies that might be needed
in order to analyze and evaluate impacts, and obtain public input on
the range and acceptability of alternatives. Both meetings will be
conducted on April 18, 2006 in the Lopez Room at Seattle Center, 305
Harrison Street, Seattle, WA 98109. The first meeting will be held from
1 to 3:30 p.m. An informal open house will be held between 1 and 2 p.m.
A brief presentation will be made between 2 and 2:30 p.m. Then
testimony will be taken between 2:30 and 3:30 p.m. The second meeting
will be held from 4:30 to 7 p.m. Another informal open house will be
held between 4:30 and 5:30 p.m. The presentation will be made again
between 5:30 and 6 p.m. Then testimony will be taken between 6 and 7
p.m. Verbal or written comments will be accepted at the Scoping
meetings, or written comments may be sent by regular or electronic mail
to Aimee Kinney (see ADDRESSES). Ongoing communication with agencies,
Native American tribes, public interest groups, and interested citizens
will take place throughout the EIS development through the use of
public meetings, mailings, and the Internet. Additional meetings will
be scheduled upon completion of the DEIS.
5. Other Environmental Review, Coordination and Permit
Requirements: The environmental review process will be comprehensive
and will integrate and satisfy the requirements of NEPA, and other
relevant Federal, State and local environmental laws. Other
environmental review, coordination, and permit requirements may include
preparation of a Clean Water Act, Section 404 evaluation by the Corps.
Dated: March 17, 2006.
Debra M. Lewis,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, District Commander.
[FR Doc. 06-3140 Filed 3-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-ER-M