Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; VOC and NOX, 16235-16237 [06-3105]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Date of default. For the purposes
of this subpart, the date of default shall
be considered as 30 days after:
(1) The first uncorrected failure to
perform any obligation under the
mortgage; or
(2) The first failure to make a monthly
payment that subsequent payments by
the borrower are insufficient to cover
when applied to the overdue monthly
payments in the order in which they
became due.
(c) Notice of default. Once each
month, on a day prescribed by HUD, the
mortgagee shall report to HUD all
mortgages that were in default on the
last day of the month, or that were
reported as in default the previous
month. The report shall be made on a
form prescribed by HUD.
(d) Number of days in month. For the
purposes of this section, each month
shall be considered to have 30 days.
§ 203.468
I
[Removed and reserved]
8. Remove and reserve § 203.468.
Dated: March 24, 2006.
Brian D. Montgomery,
Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal
Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 06–3083 Filed 3–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD05–06–028]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Elizabeth River—Eastern Branch,
Norfolk, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
hsrobinson on PROD1PC61 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, Fifth Coast
Guard District, has issued a temporary
deviation from the regulations
governing the operation of the Berkley
Bridge across the Eastern Branch of the
Elizabeth River, mile 0.4, at Norfolk,
Virginia. To facilitate electrical and
mechanical repairs, this deviation
allows the drawbridge to remain closed
to navigation each day, from 7 a.m. to
7 p.m., on April 18, 19, and 20, 2006.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
7 a.m. on April 18, 2006 to 7 p.m. on
April 20, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this
docket are available for inspection and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Mar 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
copying at the Fifth Coast Guard
District, Federal Building, 1st Floor, 431
Crawford Street, Portsmouth, VA
23704–5004 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The phone number is (757)
398–6629. Commander (obr), Fifth Coast
Guard District maintains the public
docket for this temporary deviation.
Gary
Heyer, Bridge Management Specialist,
Fifth Coast Guard District, at (757) 398–
6629.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The
Berkley Bridge, a lift-type drawbridge,
has a vertical clearance in the closed
position to vessels of 48 feet at mean
high water.
The bridge owner, the Virginia
Department of Transportation, has
requested a temporary deviation from
the current operating regulation set out
in 33 CFR 117.1007(c), to effect
electrical and mechanical repairs of the
draw span.
To facilitate the repairs, the
drawbridge will remain closed to
navigation each day, from 7 a.m. to 7
p.m., on April 18, 19, and 20, 2006.
During these periods, the repairs require
immobilizing the operation of the lift
span in the closed-to-navigation
position. At all other times, the
drawbridge will operate in accordance
with the current operating regulations
outlined in 33 CFR 117.1007(c).
The Coast Guard has informed the
known users of the waterway so that
they can arrange their transits to
minimize any impact caused by the
temporary deviation.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c),
this work will be performed with all due
speed in order to return the bridge to
normal operation as soon as possible.
This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR
117.35.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: March 23, 2006.
Waverly W. Gregory, Jr.,
Chief, Bridge Administration Branch, Fifth
Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 06–3115 Filed 3–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16235
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2005–PA–0015; FRL–8051–
8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; VOC and NOX RACT
Determinations for Two Individual
Sources
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to
approve revisions to the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania State Implementation
Plan (SIP). The revisions were
submitted by the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection
(PADEP) to establish and require
reasonably available control technology
(RACT) for two major sources of volatile
organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen
oxides (NOX) pursuant to the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s
(Pennsylvania’s or the
Commonwealth’s) SIP-approved generic
RACT regulations. EPA is approving
these revisions in accordance with the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on May 1, 2006.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2005–PA–
0015. All documents in the docket are
listed in the https://www.regulations.gov
Web site. Although listed in the
electronic docket, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality, P.O.
Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania 17105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pauline De Vose, (215) 814–2186, or by
e-mail at devose.pauline@epa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\31MRR1.SGM
31MRR1
16236
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
NPR proposed approval of formal SIP
revisions submitted by Pennsylvania on
August 15, 2003. These SIP revisions
consist of source-specific operating
permits and/or plan approvals issued by
PADEP to establish and require RACT
pursuant to the Commonwealth’s SIP-
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On October 26, 2005 (70 FR 61750),
EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The
approved generic RACT regulations.
The following table identifies the
sources and the individual plan
approvals (PAs) and operating permits
(OPs) which are the subject of this
rulemaking.
PENNSYLVANIA—VOC AND NOX RACT DETERMINATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL SOURCES
Source’s name
County
Plan approval (PA #)
operating permit (OP #)
Source type
The International Metals Reclamation Co.
Petrowax PA, Inc ............................
Lawrence .....................
OP 37–243 ..................
Metals Recovery Facility ................
VOC.
Venango ......................
PA 61–020 ...................
Refinery ..........................................
VOC and NOX.
An explanation of the CAA’s RACT
requirements as they apply to the
Commonwealth and EPA’s rationale for
approving these SIP revisions were
provided in the NPR and will not be
restated here. No public comments were
received on the NPR.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving the revisions to the
Pennsylvania SIP submitted by PADEP
on August 15, 2003 to establish and
require VOC and NOX RACT for two
sources pursuant to the
Commonwealth’s SIP-approved generic
RACT regulations.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC61 with RULES
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Public Law 104–4). This rule also does
not have tribal implications because it
will not have a substantial direct effect
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Mar 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘Major source’’
pollutant
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 804
exempts from section 801 the following
types of rules: (1) Rules of particular
applicability; (2) rules relating to agency
management or personnel; and (3) rules
of agency organization, procedure, or
practice that do not substantially affect
the rights or obligations of non-agency
parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). EPA is not
required to submit a rule report
regarding today’s action under section
801 because this is a rule of particular
applicability establishing sourcespecific requirements for two named
sources.
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by May 30, 2006.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action
approving source-specific RACT
requirements for two sources in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
E:\FR\FM\31MRR1.SGM
31MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Dated: March 21, 2006.
William Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
I
*
Subpart NN—Pennsylvania
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
2. In § 52.2020, the table in paragraph
(d)(1) is amended by adding the entries
I
State effective
date
Name of source
Permit No.
County
*
*
The International Metals Reclamation
Co.
*
OP 37–243 ..........
*
Lawrence .............
*
8/9/00
Petrowax PA, Inc ...............................
PA 61–020 ...........
Venango ..............
1/2/96
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 06–3105 Filed 3–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2005–MD–0014; FRL–
8051–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Amendments to the Control
of VOC Emissions From Yeast
Manufacturing
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC61 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Maryland.
This revision pertains to the
amendments of a regulation that
controls volatile organic compound
(VOC) emissions from yeast
manufacturing facilities. EPA is
approving this SIP revision in
accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA
or Act).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
May 1, 2006.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2005–MD–
0014. All documents in the docket are
listed in the https://www.regulations.gov
Web site. Although listed in the
electronic docket, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Mar 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Maryland Department of
the Environment, 1800 Washington
Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore,
Maryland 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose
Quinto, (215) 814–2182, or by e-mail at
quinto.rose@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On February 6, 2006 (71 FR 6028),
EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of
Maryland. The NPR proposed approval
of the amendments to control VOC
emissions from yeast manufacturing
facilities, COMAR 26.11.19.17. The
formal SIP revision was submitted by
the Maryland Department of the
Environment on October 31, 2005.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
The amendments to COMAR
26.11.19.17 are: (1) To reinstate the
requirements for non-nutritional and
specialty yeast installations to meet
certain operational requirements to
minimize VOC emissions, and (2) to
clarify the 98 percent compliance
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
for The International Metal Reclamation
Co. and Petrowax PA, Inc. at the end of
the table to read as follows:
§ 52.2020
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Sfmt 4700
16237
Identification of plan.
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
*
EPA approval
date
*
3/31/06 [Insert
page number
where the document begins].
3/31/06 [Insert
page number
where the document begins].
*
Additional explanation/
§ 52.2063 citation
*
52.2020(d)(1)(m).
52.2020(d)(1)(m).
demonstration is a 12-month rolling
average.
Other specific requirements of
COMAR 26.11.19.17 and the rationale
for EPA’s proposed action are explained
in the NPR and will not be restated here.
No public comments were received on
the NPR.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the amendments to
the control of VOC emissions from yeast
manufacturing facilities, COMAR
26.11.19.17, submitted on October 31,
2005, as a revision to the Maryland SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
E:\FR\FM\31MRR1.SGM
31MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16235-16237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3105]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2005-PA-0015; FRL-8051-8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; VOC and NOX RACT Determinations for Two Individual
Sources
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to approve revisions to the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP). The
revisions were submitted by the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP) to establish and require reasonably
available control technology (RACT) for two major sources of volatile
organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOX) pursuant
to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's (Pennsylvania's or the
Commonwealth's) SIP-approved generic RACT regulations. EPA is approving
these revisions in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on May 1, 2006.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2005-PA-0015. All documents in the docket are listed
in the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
electronic docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal are available at the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air
Quality, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
17105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pauline De Vose, (215) 814-2186, or by
e-mail at devose.pauline@epa.gov.
[[Page 16236]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On October 26, 2005 (70 FR 61750), EPA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPR) for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The NPR
proposed approval of formal SIP revisions submitted by Pennsylvania on
August 15, 2003. These SIP revisions consist of source-specific
operating permits and/or plan approvals issued by PADEP to establish
and require RACT pursuant to the Commonwealth's SIP-approved generic
RACT regulations. The following table identifies the sources and the
individual plan approvals (PAs) and operating permits (OPs) which are
the subject of this rulemaking.
Pennsylvania--VOC and NOX RACT Determinations for Individual Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan approval (PA
) ``Major source''
Source's name County operating permit Source type pollutant
(OP )
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The International Metals Lawrence......... OP 37-243........ Metals Recovery VOC.
Reclamation Co. Facility.
Petrowax PA, Inc............... Venango.......... PA 61-020........ Refinery......... VOC and NOX.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An explanation of the CAA's RACT requirements as they apply to the
Commonwealth and EPA's rationale for approving these SIP revisions were
provided in the NPR and will not be restated here. No public comments
were received on the NPR.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving the revisions to the Pennsylvania SIP submitted by
PADEP on August 15, 2003 to establish and require VOC and
NOX RACT for two sources pursuant to the Commonwealth's SIP-
approved generic RACT regulations.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). This rule also does not
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action also does not have federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal
standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule
also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. Section 804 exempts from section 801 the following types
of rules: (1) Rules of particular applicability; (2) rules relating to
agency management or personnel; and (3) rules of agency organization,
procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). EPA is not required
to submit a rule report regarding today's action under section 801
because this is a rule of particular applicability establishing source-
specific requirements for two named sources.
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 30, 2006. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action approving source-specific RACT requirements
for two sources in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania may not be
challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See
section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
[[Page 16237]]
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: March 21, 2006.
William Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN--Pennsylvania
0
2. In Sec. 52.2020, the table in paragraph (d)(1) is amended by adding
the entries for The International Metal Reclamation Co. and Petrowax
PA, Inc. at the end of the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2020 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of source Permit No. County effective EPA approval date Additional explanation/Sec.
date 52.2063 citation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
The International Metals OP 37-243........... Lawrence............ 8/9/00 3/31/06 [Insert page 52.2020(d)(1)(m).
Reclamation Co. number where the
document begins].
Petrowax PA, Inc................. PA 61-020........... Venango............. 1/2/96 3/31/06 [Insert page 52.2020(d)(1)(m).
number where the
document begins].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 06-3105 Filed 3-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P