Medical Device Reporting; Premarket Approval of Medical Devices; Quality System Regulation; Technical Amendment, 16227-16228 [06-3089]
Download as PDF
16227
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Oxytetracycline and
neomycin sulfate
amount
Indications for use
Limitations
Sponsor
(i) 10 to 20 grams
per ton of feed
Sheep: For increased rate of weight
gain and improved feed efficiency
(ii) To provide 0.05
to 0.1 mg/lb of
body weight
daily.
Calves (up to 250 lb): For increased
rate of weight gain and improved
feed efficiency
Feed continuously; in milk replacers or starter feed
066104
(iii) To provide 10
mg/lb of body
weight daily
1. Calves and beef and nonlactating
dairy cattle: For treatment of bacterial
enteritis caused by E. coli and bacterial pneumonia (shipping fever
complex) caused by P. multocida
susceptible to oxytetracycline; treatment and control of colibacillosis
(bacterial enteritis) caused by E. coli
susceptible to neomycin
Feed continuously for 7 to 14 d; in feed or milk replacers. If symptoms persist after using for 2 or 3 d, consult a veterinarian. Treatment should continue 24 to 48
hours beyond remission of disease symptoms. A withdrawal period has not been established for use in
preruminating calves. Do not use in calves to be processed for veal. A milk discard time has not been established for use in lactating dairy cattle. Do not use in
female dairy cattle 20 months of age or older. Withdraw 5 d before slaughter
Feed continuously for 7 to 14 d; in milk replacers or
starter feed. If symptoms persist after using for 2 or 3
d, consult a veterinarian. Treatment should continue
24 to 48 hours beyond remission of disease symptoms. A withdrawal period has not been established for
use in preruminating calves. Do not use in calves to
be processed for veal. A milk discard time has not
been established for use in lactating dairy cattle. Do
not use in female dairy cattle 20 months of age or
older. Withdraw 5 d before slaughter
Feed continuously for 7 to 14 d. If symptoms persist after
using for 2 or 3 d, consult a veterinarian. Treatment
should continue 24 to 48 hours beyond remission of
disease symptoms. Withdraw 5 d before slaughter
066104
2. Calves (up to 250 lb): For treatment
of bacterial enteritis caused by E. coli
susceptible to oxytetracycline; treatment and control of colibacillosis
(bacterial enteritis) caused by E. coli
susceptible to neomycin
3. Sheep: For treatment of bacterial enteritis caused by E. coli and bacterial
pneumonia caused by P. multocida
susceptible to oxytetracycline; treatment and control of colibacillosis
(bacterial enteritis) caused by E. coli
susceptible to neomycin
066104
066104
066104
(iv) To provide 25
mg/head/day
Calves (250 to 400 lb): For increased
rate of weight gain and improved
feed efficiency
066104
(v) To provide 75
mg/head/day
Growing cattle (over 400 lb): For increased rate of weight gain; improved feed efficiency, and reduction
of liver condemnation due to liver abscesses
066104
(vi) To provide 0.5
to 2.0 g/head/day
Cattle: For prevention and treatment of
the early stages of shipping fever
complex
5. In § 558.460, redesignate
paragraphs (d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), and
(d)(2)(viii) as paragraphs (d)(2)(iii),
(d)(2)(v), and (d)(2)(vi); and add new
paragraph (d)(2)(iv) to read as follows:
I
§ 558.460
Feed 3 to 5 d before and after arrival in feedlots. A withdrawal period has not been established for use in
preruminating calves. Do not use in calves to be processed for veal. A milk discard time has not been established for use in lactating dairy cattle. Do not use in
female dairy cattle 20 months of age or older
Dated: March 22, 2006.
Stephen F. Sundlof,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 06–3120 Filed 3–30–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
21 CFR Parts 814 and 820
Food and Drug Administration
Penicillin.
*
hsrobinson on PROD1PC61 with RULES
066104
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) Nicarbazin alone or with
roxarsone as in § 558.366.
*
*
*
*
*
[Docket No. 2006N–0127]
Medical Device Reporting; Premarket
Approval of Medical Devices; Quality
System Regulation; Technical
Amendment
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Mar 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31MRR1.SGM
31MRR1
16228
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 62 / Friday, March 31, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Final rule; technical
amendment.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is issuing this
final rule to correct some inadvertent
typographical errors and other minor
errors in certain device regulations. FDA
intends for these corrections to improve
the accuracy of the agency’s regulations.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 31, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Philip Desjardins, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health (HFZ–215),
Food and Drug Administration, 1350
Piccard Dr., Rockville, MD 20850, 240–
276–2343.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Highlights of Final Rule
FDA is making the following changes
to correct typographical and other minor
errors in certain device regulations:
1. FDA is amending 21 CFR
814.126(b)(1)(iv) to replace ‘‘8dd’’ with
‘‘803.’’
2. FDA is amending 21 CFR
820.198(a)(3) to eliminate a reference to
part 804, a part that does not exist.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC61 with RULES
II. Environmental Impact
The agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.30(i) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
III. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the
final rule under Executive Order 12866
and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612), and the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public
Law 104–4). Executive Order 12866
directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). The agency
believes that this final rule is not a
significant regulatory action under the
Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because this rule corrects only
typographical errors in existing
regulations and does not change in any
way how devices are regulated, the
agency certifies that the final rule will
not have a significant economic impact
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Mar 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
on a substantial number of small
entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $115
million, using the most current (2003)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. FDA does not expect
this final rule to result in any 1-year
expenditure that would meet or exceed
this amount.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
FDA has determined that this final
rule contains no collections of
information. Therefore, clearance by the
Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is
not required.
V. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this final rule in
accordance with the principles set forth
in Executive Order 13132. FDA has
determined that the rule does not
contain policies that have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, the
agency has concluded that the rule does
not contain policies that have
federalism implications as defined in
the Executive order and, consequently,
a federalism summary impact statement
is not required.
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 814
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Institutional review board
requirements, Medical devices, Medical
research, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
21 CFR Part 820
Medical devices, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
I Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR parts 814
and 820 are amended as follows:
PART 814—PREMARKET APPROVAL
OF MEDICAL DEVICES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 814 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 352, 353, 360,
360c–360j, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 379, 379e,
381.
2. Amend paragraph (b)(1)(iv) of
§ 814.126 by removing ‘‘part 8dd’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘part 803’’.
I
PART 820—QUALITY SYSTEM
REGULATION
3. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 820 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 352, 360, 360c,
360d, 360e, 360h, 360i, 360j, 360l, 371, 374,
381, 383.
4. Amend paragraph (a)(3) of
§ 820.198 by removing ‘‘or 804’’.
I
Dated: March 24, 2006.
Linda S. Kahan,
Deputy Director, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. 06–3089 Filed 3–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
VI. The Technical Amendments
This rule corrects certain minor errors
in existing regulations. This
administrative action is limited to
correcting typographical errors and
eliminating a reference to a nonexistent
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part.
It makes no changes in substantive
requirements.
Because the final rule is an
administrative action, FDA has
determined that it has no substantive
impact on the public. It imposes no
costs, and merely makes technical
administrative changes in the CFR for
the convenience of the public. FDA,
therefore, for good cause, finds under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and (d)(3) that notice
and public comment are unnecessary.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 17
[Public Notice 5311]
Overpayments From the Foreign
Service Retirement and Disability Fund
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of State is
revising its regulations regarding
overpayments from the Foreign Service
Retirement and Disability Fund under
the Foreign Service Retirement and
Disability System (FSRDS) to reflect
internal Department restructuring and
realignment of responsibilities and the
E:\FR\FM\31MRR1.SGM
31MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16227-16228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3089]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 814 and 820
[Docket No. 2006N-0127]
Medical Device Reporting; Premarket Approval of Medical Devices;
Quality System Regulation; Technical Amendment
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
[[Page 16228]]
ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing this final
rule to correct some inadvertent typographical errors and other minor
errors in certain device regulations. FDA intends for these corrections
to improve the accuracy of the agency's regulations.
Effective Date: March 31, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Desjardins, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health (HFZ-215), Food and Drug Administration, 1350
Piccard Dr., Rockville, MD 20850, 240-276-2343.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Highlights of Final Rule
FDA is making the following changes to correct typographical and
other minor errors in certain device regulations:
1. FDA is amending 21 CFR 814.126(b)(1)(iv) to replace ``8dd'' with
``803.''
2. FDA is amending 21 CFR 820.198(a)(3) to eliminate a reference to
part 804, a part that does not exist.
II. Environmental Impact
The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.30(i) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
III. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive
Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). Executive
Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The agency believes that
this final rule is not a significant regulatory action under the
Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Because this rule corrects only typographical errors
in existing regulations and does not change in any way how devices are
regulated, the agency certifies that the final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $115 million, using the most current (2003) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this
final rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
FDA has determined that this final rule contains no collections of
information. Therefore, clearance by the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.
V. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles
set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that the rule
does not contain policies that have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Accordingly, the agency has concluded
that the rule does not contain policies that have federalism
implications as defined in the Executive order and, consequently, a
federalism summary impact statement is not required.
VI. The Technical Amendments
This rule corrects certain minor errors in existing regulations.
This administrative action is limited to correcting typographical
errors and eliminating a reference to a nonexistent Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part. It makes no changes in substantive
requirements.
Because the final rule is an administrative action, FDA has
determined that it has no substantive impact on the public. It imposes
no costs, and merely makes technical administrative changes in the CFR
for the convenience of the public. FDA, therefore, for good cause,
finds under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and (d)(3) that notice and public
comment are unnecessary.
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 814
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Institutional review board requirements, Medical devices,
Medical research, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
21 CFR Part 820
Medical devices, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR parts
814 and 820 are amended as follows:
PART 814--PREMARKET APPROVAL OF MEDICAL DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 814 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 352, 353, 360, 360c-360j, 371, 372,
373, 374, 375, 379, 379e, 381.
0
2. Amend paragraph (b)(1)(iv) of Sec. 814.126 by removing ``part 8dd''
and adding in its place ``part 803''.
PART 820--QUALITY SYSTEM REGULATION
0
3. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 820 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 352, 360, 360c, 360d, 360e, 360h,
360i, 360j, 360l, 371, 374, 381, 383.
0
4. Amend paragraph (a)(3) of Sec. 820.198 by removing ``or 804''.
Dated: March 24, 2006.
Linda S. Kahan,
Deputy Director, Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. 06-3089 Filed 3-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S