Commission Information Collection Activities, Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension, 16132-16133 [E6-4591]
Download as PDF
16132
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 61 / Thursday, March 30, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Michael Miller may be reached by
telephone at (202) 502–8415, by fax at
(202) 273–0873, and by e-mail at
michael.miller@ferc.gov.
[Docket No. IC06–500–000; FERC–500]
March 23, 2006.
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
requirements of section 3506(c)(2)(a) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13), the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission) is
soliciting public comment on the
specific aspects of the information
collection described below.
DATES: Comments on the collection of
information are due May 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Copies of sample filings of
the proposed collection of information
can be obtained from the Commission’s
Web site (https://www.ferc.gov/docsfiling/elibrary.asp) or from the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, Attn:
Michael Miller, Office of the Executive
Director, ED–34, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. Comments may
be filed either in paper format or
electronically. Those parties filing
electronically do not need to make a
paper filing. For paper filings, the
original and 14 copies of such
comments should be submitted to the
Secretary of the Commission, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426
and refer to Docket No. IC06–500–000.
Documents filed electronically via the
Internet must be prepared in
WordPerfect, MS Word, Portable
Document Format, or ASCII format. To
file the document, access the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.ferc.gov and click on ‘‘Make an Efiling’’, and then follow the instructions
for each screen. First time users will
have to establish a user name and
password. The Commission will send an
automatic acknowledgement to the
sender’s e-mail address upon receipt of
comments.
All comments may be viewed, printed
or downloaded remotely via the Internet
through FERC’s homepage using the
eLibrary link. For user assistance,
contact FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or
toll-free at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY,
contact (202) 502–8659.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:32 Mar 29, 2006
Jkt 208001
The
information collected under the
requirements of FERC–500 ‘‘Application
for License/Relicense for Water Projects
With More Than 5 MW Capacity’’ (OMB
No. 1902–0058) consists of the filing
requirements as defined in 18 CFR
Sections 4.32, 4.38, 4.40–41, 4.50–51,
4.61, 4.71, 4.93, 4.107–108, 4.201–202,
16.1, 16.10, 16.20, 292.203 and 292.208.
The information collected under the
requirements of FERC–500 is used by
the Commission to determine the broad
impact of a hydropower license
application. In deciding whether to
issue a license, the Commission gives
equal consideration to full range of
licensing purposes related to the
potential value of a stream or river.
Among these purposes are:
Hydroelectric development; energy
conservation; fish and wildlife
resources; including their spawning
grounds and habitat; visual resources;
cultural resources; recreational
opportunities; other aspects of
environmental quality; irrigation; flood
control and water supply.
Submission of the information is
necessary to fulfill the requirements of
the Federal Power Act in order for the
Commission to make the required
finding that the proposal is
economically sound and is best adapted
to a comprehensive plan for improving/
developing a waterway or waterways.
Under Part I of the Federal Power Act
(FPA), (16 U.S.C. sections 791a et seq.),
the Commission has the authority to
issue licenses for hydroelectric projects
on the waters over which Congress has
jurisdiction. The Electric Consumers
Protection Act (Pub. L. 99–495, 100 Stat.
1243) provides the Commission with the
responsibility of issuing licenses for
nonfederal hydroelectric plants. ECPA
also amended the language of the FPA
concerning environmental issues to
ensure environmental quality.
In Order No. 2002 (68 FR 51070,
August 25, 2003; FERC Statutes and
Regulations ¶31,150 at p. 30,688) the
Commission revised its regulations to
create a new licensing process in which
a potential license applicant’s pre-filing
consultation and the Commission’s
scoping process pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321) are conducted concurrently
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Commission Information Collection
Activities, Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Extension
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
rather than sequentially. The
Commission estimated that if an
applicant chooses to use the new
licensing process, this could result in a
reduction of 30% from the traditional
licensing process. The reporting burden
related to Order No. 2002 would be on
average 32,200 hours as opposed to
46,000 hours per respondent in the
traditional licensing process or 39,000
hours for the alternative licensing
process. It has been nearly three years
since Order No. 2002 was issued and
applicants have experienced the
opportunity to gain the benefits from the
revised licensing process. In particular,
applicants have benefited from (a)
increased public participation in prefiling consultation; (b) increased
assistance from Commission staff to the
potential applicant and stakeholders
during the development of a license
application; (c) development by the
potential applicant of a Commissionapproved study plan; (d) elimination of
the need for post-application study
requests; (e) issuance of public
schedules and enforcement of
deadlines; (f) better coordination
between the Commission’s processes,
including the NEPA document
preparation, and those of Federal and
state agencies and Indian tribes with
authority to require conditions for
Commission-issued licenses. It is for
these reasons, that the Commission will
use the estimates projected in the table
below.
The information collected is needed
to evaluate license application pursuant
to the comprehensive development
standard of FPA sections 4(e) and
10(a)(1), to consider the comprehensive
development analysis of certain factors
with respect to the new license set forth
in section 15, and to comply with
NEPA, Endangered Species Act (16
U.S.C. section 1531 et seq.) and the
National Historic Preservation Act (16
U.S.C. section 470 et seq.).
Commission staff conducts a
systematic review of the prepared
application with supplemental
documentation provided by the
solicitation of comments from other
agencies and the public.
Action: The Commission is requesting
a three-year extension of the current
expiration date, with no changes to the
existing collection of data.
Burden Statement: Public reporting
burden for this collection is estimated
as:
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
16133
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 61 / Thursday, March 30, 2006 / Notices
Number of responses per
respondent
(2)
Average burden hours per
response
(3)
Total annual burden hours
(1) × (2) × (3)
13
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Number of respondents annually
(1)
1
35,620
15,744,040
Estimated cost burden to respondents
is $62,430,000. ($7,800,000 (traditional
process) + $17,600,000 (alternative
process) + $37,030,000 (integrated
process). These costs were determined
by the percentage of applicants that
would be using each of these processes.
Annualized costs per project $2,600,000
(traditional); $2,200,000 (alternative
licensing) and $1,610,000 (integrated
licensing).
The reporting burden includes the
total time, effort, or financial resources
expended to generate, maintain, retain,
disclose, or provide the information
including: (1) Reviewing instructions;
(2) developing, acquiring, installing, and
utilizing technology and systems for the
purposes of collecting, validating,
verifying, processing, maintaining,
disclosing and providing information;
(3) adjusting the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements; (4)
training personnel to respond to a
collection of information; (5) searching
data sources; (6) completing and
reviewing the collection of information;
and (7) transmitting, or otherwise
disclosing the information.
The estimate of cost for respondents
is based upon salaries for professional
and clerical support, as well as direct
and indirect overhead costs. Direct costs
include all costs directly attributable to
providing this information, such as
administrative costs and the cost for
information technology. Indirect or
overhead costs are costs incurred by an
organization in support of its mission.
These costs apply to activities, which
benefit the whole organization rather
than any one particular function or
activity.
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
the agency’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:32 Mar 29, 2006
Jkt 208001
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–4591 Filed 3–29–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. IC06–714–000; FERC Form 714]
Commission Information Collection
Activities, Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Extension
March 23, 2006.
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
requirements of section 3506(c)(2)(a) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13), the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission) is
soliciting public comment on the
specific aspects of the information
collection described below.
DATES: Comments on the collection of
information are due May 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Copies of sample filings of
the proposed collection of information
can be obtained from the Commission’s
Web site (https://www.ferc.gov/docsfiling/elibrary.asp) or from the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, Attn:
Michael Miller, Office of the Executive
Director, ED–34, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. Comments may
be filed either in paper format or
electronically. Those parties filing
electronically do not need to make a
paper filing. For paper filing, the
original and 14 copies of such
comments should be submitted to the
Secretary of the Commission, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426
and refer to Docket No. IC06–714–000.
Documents filed electronically via the
Internet must be prepared in
WordPerfect, MS Word, Portable
Document Format, or ASCII format. To
file the document, access the
Commission’s Web site at https://
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
www.ferc.gov and click on ‘‘Make an Efiling’’, and then follow the instructions
for each screen. First time users will
have to establish a user name and
password. The Commission will send an
automatic acknowledgement to the
sender’s e-mail address upon receipt of
comments.
All comments may be viewed, printed
or downloaded remotely via the Internet
through FERC’s homepage using the
eLibrary link. For user assistance,
contact ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov or
toll-free at (866) 208–3676. or for TTY,
contact (202) 502–8659.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Miller may be reached by
telephone at (202) 502–8415, by fax at
(202) 273–0873, and by e-mail at
michael.miller@ferc.gov.
The
information collected under the
requirements of FERC Form–714
‘‘Annual Electric Control and Planning
Area Report’’ (OMB No. 1902–0140,
expiration date October 31, 2006) is
used by the Commission to carry out its
responsibilities in implementing the
statutory provisions of sections 202,
207, 210, 211–213 of the Federal Power
Act (FPA), as amended (49 Stat. 838; 16
U.S.C. 791a–825r) and particularly
sections 304–309 and 311, as well as
Energy Policy Act sections 1211, 1221,
1231, 1241 and 1242. The Commission
implements the Form 714 filing
requirements in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) under 18 CFR section
141.51.
Through FERC Form 714, the
Commission gathers electric
transmission system operating and
planning information, from control area
operations and from utilities charged
with resource planning and demand
forecasting for planning areas that have
an annual peak demand greater than 200
megawatts. This information is used in
evaluating transmission system
reliability and performance, wholesale
rate investigations, and wholesale
market under emerging competitive
forces.
Action: The Commission is requesting
a three-year extension of the current
expiration date, with no changes to the
existing collection of data.
Burden Statement: Public reporting
burden for this collection is estimated
as:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16132-16133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-4591]
[[Page 16132]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. IC06-500-000; FERC-500]
Commission Information Collection Activities, Proposed
Collection; Comment Request; Extension
March 23, 2006.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3506(c)(2)(a)
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13), the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the information collection described below.
DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due May 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Copies of sample filings of the proposed collection of
information can be obtained from the Commission's Web site (https://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp) or from the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, Attn: Michael Miller, Office of the Executive
Director, ED-34, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Comments
may be filed either in paper format or electronically. Those parties
filing electronically do not need to make a paper filing. For paper
filings, the original and 14 copies of such comments should be
submitted to the Secretary of the Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426 and refer to
Docket No. IC06-500-000.
Documents filed electronically via the Internet must be prepared in
WordPerfect, MS Word, Portable Document Format, or ASCII format. To
file the document, access the Commission's Web site at https://
www.ferc.gov and click on ``Make an E-filing'', and then follow the
instructions for each screen. First time users will have to establish a
user name and password. The Commission will send an automatic
acknowledgement to the sender's e-mail address upon receipt of
comments.
All comments may be viewed, printed or downloaded remotely via the
Internet through FERC's homepage using the eLibrary link. For user
assistance, contact FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll-free at (866)
208-3676, or for TTY, contact (202) 502-8659.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Miller may be reached by
telephone at (202) 502-8415, by fax at (202) 273-0873, and by e-mail at
michael.miller@ferc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information collected under the
requirements of FERC-500 ``Application for License/Relicense for Water
Projects With More Than 5 MW Capacity'' (OMB No. 1902-0058) consists of
the filing requirements as defined in 18 CFR Sections 4.32, 4.38, 4.40-
41, 4.50-51, 4.61, 4.71, 4.93, 4.107-108, 4.201-202, 16.1, 16.10,
16.20, 292.203 and 292.208. The information collected under the
requirements of FERC-500 is used by the Commission to determine the
broad impact of a hydropower license application. In deciding whether
to issue a license, the Commission gives equal consideration to full
range of licensing purposes related to the potential value of a stream
or river. Among these purposes are: Hydroelectric development; energy
conservation; fish and wildlife resources; including their spawning
grounds and habitat; visual resources; cultural resources; recreational
opportunities; other aspects of environmental quality; irrigation;
flood control and water supply.
Submission of the information is necessary to fulfill the
requirements of the Federal Power Act in order for the Commission to
make the required finding that the proposal is economically sound and
is best adapted to a comprehensive plan for improving/developing a
waterway or waterways. Under Part I of the Federal Power Act (FPA), (16
U.S.C. sections 791a et seq.), the Commission has the authority to
issue licenses for hydroelectric projects on the waters over which
Congress has jurisdiction. The Electric Consumers Protection Act (Pub.
L. 99-495, 100 Stat. 1243) provides the Commission with the
responsibility of issuing licenses for nonfederal hydroelectric plants.
ECPA also amended the language of the FPA concerning environmental
issues to ensure environmental quality.
In Order No. 2002 (68 FR 51070, August 25, 2003; FERC Statutes and
Regulations ]31,150 at p. 30,688) the Commission revised its
regulations to create a new licensing process in which a potential
license applicant's pre-filing consultation and the Commission's
scoping process pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321) are conducted concurrently rather than sequentially. The
Commission estimated that if an applicant chooses to use the new
licensing process, this could result in a reduction of 30% from the
traditional licensing process. The reporting burden related to Order
No. 2002 would be on average 32,200 hours as opposed to 46,000 hours
per respondent in the traditional licensing process or 39,000 hours for
the alternative licensing process. It has been nearly three years since
Order No. 2002 was issued and applicants have experienced the
opportunity to gain the benefits from the revised licensing process. In
particular, applicants have benefited from (a) increased public
participation in pre-filing consultation; (b) increased assistance from
Commission staff to the potential applicant and stakeholders during the
development of a license application; (c) development by the potential
applicant of a Commission-approved study plan; (d) elimination of the
need for post-application study requests; (e) issuance of public
schedules and enforcement of deadlines; (f) better coordination between
the Commission's processes, including the NEPA document preparation,
and those of Federal and state agencies and Indian tribes with
authority to require conditions for Commission-issued licenses. It is
for these reasons, that the Commission will use the estimates projected
in the table below.
The information collected is needed to evaluate license application
pursuant to the comprehensive development standard of FPA sections 4(e)
and 10(a)(1), to consider the comprehensive development analysis of
certain factors with respect to the new license set forth in section
15, and to comply with NEPA, Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. section
1531 et seq.) and the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C.
section 470 et seq.).
Commission staff conducts a systematic review of the prepared
application with supplemental documentation provided by the
solicitation of comments from other agencies and the public.
Action: The Commission is requesting a three-year extension of the
current expiration date, with no changes to the existing collection of
data.
Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this collection is
estimated as:
[[Page 16133]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Number of Average burden Total annual
respondents responses per hours per burden hours (1)
annually (1) respondent (2) response (3) x (2) x (3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
13 1 35,620 15,744,040
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated cost burden to respondents is $62,430,000. ($7,800,000
(traditional process) + $17,600,000 (alternative process) + $37,030,000
(integrated process). These costs were determined by the percentage of
applicants that would be using each of these processes. Annualized
costs per project $2,600,000 (traditional); $2,200,000 (alternative
licensing) and $1,610,000 (integrated licensing).
The reporting burden includes the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide
the information including: (1) Reviewing instructions; (2) developing,
acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the
purposes of collecting, validating, verifying, processing, maintaining,
disclosing and providing information; (3) adjusting the existing ways
to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
(4) training personnel to respond to a collection of information; (5)
searching data sources; (6) completing and reviewing the collection of
information; and (7) transmitting, or otherwise disclosing the
information.
The estimate of cost for respondents is based upon salaries for
professional and clerical support, as well as direct and indirect
overhead costs. Direct costs include all costs directly attributable to
providing this information, such as administrative costs and the cost
for information technology. Indirect or overhead costs are costs
incurred by an organization in support of its mission. These costs
apply to activities, which benefit the whole organization rather than
any one particular function or activity.
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-4591 Filed 3-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P