Special Conditions: Airbus Model A380-800 Airplane, Extendable Length Escape System, 15645-15647 [E6-4511]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2006 / Proposed Rules
as to achieve a roll rate not less than one
third of that obtained in paragraph b.
above.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
20, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–4509 Filed 3–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM342; Notice No. 25–06–03–
SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Model
A380–800 Airplane, Extendable Length
Escape System
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice proposes special
conditions for the Airbus A380–800
airplane. This airplane will have novel
or unusual design features when
compared to the state of technology
envisioned in the airworthiness
standards for transport category
airplanes. Many of these novel or
unusual design features are associated
with the complex systems and the
configuration of the airplane, including
its full-length double deck. For these
design features, the applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
regarding extendable length escape
slides. These proposed special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
Additional special conditions will be
issued for other novel or unusual design
features of the Airbus Model A380–800
airplane.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 15, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this proposal
may be mailed in duplicate to: Federal
Aviation Administration, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Attention: Rules
Docket (ANM–113), Docket No. NM342,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98055–4056; or delivered in
duplicate to the Transport Airplane
Directorate at the above address. All
comments must be marked: Docket No.
NM342. Comments may be inspected in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:38 Mar 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Holly Thorson, FAA, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055–4056;
telephone (425) 227–1357; facsimile
(425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written comments, data, or
views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
special conditions, explain the reason
for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. We ask that
you send us two copies of written
comments.
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive as well as a report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning
these proposed special conditions. The
docket is available for public inspection
before and after the comment closing
date. If you wish to review the docket
in person, go to the address in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice
between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late, if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change the proposed special
conditions in light of the comments we
receive.
If you want the FAA to acknowledge
receipt of your comments on this
proposal, include with your comments
a pre-addressed, stamped postcard on
which the docket number appears. We
will stamp the date on the postcard and
mail it back to you.
Background
Airbus applied for FAA certification/
validation of the provisionallydesignated Model A3XX–100 in its
letter AI/L 810.0223/98, dated August
12, 1998, to the FAA. Application for
certification by the Joint Aviation
Authorities (JAA) of Europe had been
made on January 16, 1998, reference
AI/L 810.0019/98. In its letter to the
FAA, Airbus requested an extension to
the 5-year period for type certification
in accordance with 14 CFR 21.17(c). The
request was for an extension to a 7-year
period, using the date of the initial
application letter to the JAA as the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15645
reference date. The reason given by
Airbus for the request for extension is
related to the technical challenges,
complexity, and the number of new and
novel features on the airplane. On
November 12, 1998, the Manager,
Aircraft Engineering Division, AIR–100,
granted Airbus’ request for the 7-year
period, based on the date of application
to the JAA.
In its letter AI/LE–A 828.0040/99
Issue 3, dated July 20, 2001, Airbus
stated that its target date for type
certification of the Model A380–800 had
been moved from May 2005, to January
2006, to match the delivery date of the
first production airplane. In a
subsequent letter (AI/L 810.0223/98
issue 3, dated January 27, 2006), Airbus
stated that its target date for type
certification is October 2, 2006. In
accordance with 14 CFR 21.17(d)(2),
Airbus chose a new application date of
December 20, 1999, and requested that
the 7-year certification period which
had already been approved be
continued. The FAA has reviewed the
part 25 certification basis for the Model
A380–800 airplane, and no changes are
required based on the new application
date.
The Model A380–800 airplane will be
an all-new, four-engine jet transport
airplane with a full double-deck, twoaisle cabin. The maximum takeoff
weight will be 1.235 million pounds
with a typical three-class layout of 555
passengers.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17,
Airbus must show that the Model A380–
800 airplane meets the applicable
provisions of 14 CFR part 25, as
amended by Amendments 25–1 through
25–98. If the Administrator finds that
the applicable airworthiness regulations
do not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for the Airbus A380–
800 airplane because of novel or
unusual design features, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of 14 CFR 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Airbus Model A380–800
airplane must comply with the fuel vent
and exhaust emission requirements of
14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR
part 36. In addition, the FAA must issue
a finding of regulatory adequacy
pursuant to section 611 of Public Law
93–574, the ‘‘Noise Control Act of
1972.’’
Special conditions, as defined in 14
CFR 11.19, are issued in accordance
with 14 CFR 11.38 and become part of
the type certification basis in
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
15646
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2006 / Proposed Rules
accordance with 14 CFR 21.17(a)(2),
Amendment 21–69, effective September
16, 1991.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
Discussion of Novel or Unusual Design
Features
The Airbus Model A380–800 airplane
has 16 emergency exits and 16 escape
slides to be used for evacuation of
passengers in case of emergency. Of
these, 14 are fixed-length escape slides,
and two (at door M1) are extendable
length escape slides. The extendable
length escape slides have a 16-foot
extension packed at the toe.
Typically, airplanes have fixed length
escape slides. However, it was not
possible to use fixed length escape
slides for the A380 door M1 because of
the extreme difference between normal
sill height and high sill height
associated with collapse of some of the
landing gear in an emergency. Some
combinations of landing gear collapse
could cause the airplane to tip back on
its tail.
On the door, there is an electronic
sensor that evaluates the attitude of the
airplane and determines whether the
extension is needed. During normal
operation, the extension remains packed
at the toe end of the escape slide. When
the extension is needed, the system
sends a signal to a squib that allows the
extension to be inflated during
deployment. If the system detects that
the slide extension has failed to deploy,
a warning is activated that tells the
flight attendants that the slide should
not be used. The warning will also
activate—if after initial deployment of
the slide without the extension
deploying—the attitude of the airplane
changes to the extent that the extension
should be deployed. The slide system
design cannot accommodate deploying
the extension after deployment of the
main body of the slide.
The performance requirements for
escape systems are contained in 14 CFR
25.810 and address several abnormal
operating conditions as well as failure
conditions and reliability. The
requirements of § 25.810 remain
applicable for the slide in the
unextended mode, and for the most
part, in the extended mode. The special
conditions indicate where the
requirements differ from the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:38 Mar 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
requirements of § 25.810 for the slide in
the extended mode.
The extension is intended only for use
at high sill heights. A typical fixedlength slide operating at high sill height
does not satisfy all of the performance
requirements of § 25.810, but its
variations in performance are
understood and largely predictable.
Certain performance criteria are valid
regardless of sill height, whereas other
aspects of performance can be expected
to decline at higher sill heights. With an
extendable slide, there is a step change
in configuration and potentially a step
change in performance.
Therefore, special conditions are
needed to ensure acceptable
performance in the extended mode.
Section 25.810 specifies the basic
performance requirements for escape
slides including wind testing,
repeatability testing, and testing at
adverse sill heights. Section 25.1309(a)
requires that systems perform under
foreseeable operating conditions, such
as extreme temperatures, and a
demonstration that the system design is
appropriate for its intended function.
Standards for the equipment itself are
contained in Technical Standard Order
C69c and contribute to a satisfactory
installation.
Existing 14 CFR part 25 regulations
governing the certification of the A380
do not adequately address certification
requirements of an extendable length
escape slide. The FAA is proposing
special conditions to ensure that an
extendable length escape slide performs
adequately in both the unextended and
the extended configuration.
Technical Standard Order C69c
addresses many detailed aspects of
escape slide performance that are not
specified in 14 CFR part 25 but are
generally considered essential to
assuring adequate escape slide
performance. These special conditions
supplement the requirements of 14 CFR
part 25, for the slide in its extended
mode. However, because of the novel
nature of this design, the special
conditions will require that the escape
slide receive TSO authorization or
satisfy an equivalent standard.
Wind tests are typically conducted
only on fixed length slides at normal sill
height. Since the regulations require
that the 25 knot standard is met at the
most critical wind angle, escape slides
usually exceed 25 knots performance at
other than the critical angle. The same
is expected to be true of the slide in its
extended mode, but some reduction in
the required wind velocity is
appropriate since the slide will be in an
abnormal condition. Available data
indicates that a value of 22 knots is
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
appropriate to cover the slide in its
extended mode at normal sill height.
This corresponds to roughly 75% of the
wind energy required for the slide in its
normal attitude and will ensure that the
slide can function in its extended mode
at least as well as a fixed length slide
under similar abnormal conditions.
The special conditions also specify a
rate for evacuation of passengers which
is consistent with that of fixed length
escape slides.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Airbus
A380–800 airplane. Should Airbus
apply at a later date for a change to the
type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design features, these special
conditions would apply to that model as
well under the provisions of § 21.101.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features of the Airbus
A380–800 airplane. It is not a rule of
general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of
the type certification basis for the
Airbus A380–800 airplane.
In addition to the provisions of 14
CFR part 25, the following special
conditions apply:
1. The extendable escape slide must
receive TSO C69c authorization or the
equivalent.
2. In addition to the requirements of
§ 25.810(a)(1)(iii) for usability in
conditions of landing gear collapse, the
deployed escape slide in the extended
mode must demonstrate an evacuation
rate of 45 persons per minute per lane
at the sill height corresponding to
activation of the extension.
3. In lieu of the requirements of
§ 25.810(a)(1)(iv), the escape slide
deployed in the extended mode must be
capable of being used in 22 knot winds
directed from the critical angle, with the
airplane on all its landing gear.
4. Pitch sensor tolerances and
accuracy must be taken into account
when demonstrating compliance with
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2006 / Proposed Rules
§ 25.1309(a) for the escape slide in both
the extended and unextended modes.
5. Design of the ‘‘slide extension’’
warning must be such that the cabin
crew is made aware of a non usable
slide (i.e., the main slide has deployed,
and the door sill height is such that the
extension should be deployed but
cannot be deployed), even if this is due
to the airplane attitude changing during
the evacuation. The ability to provide
such a warning must be available for ten
minutes after the airplane is
immobilized on the ground.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
20, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–4511 Filed 3–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–24095; Directorate
Identifier 2006–CE–21–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; DORNIER
LUFTFAHRT GmbH Models 228–100,
228–101, 228–200, 228–201, 228–202,
and 228–212 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
hsrobinson on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
DORNIER LUFTFAHRT GmbH
(DORNIER) Models 228–100, 228–101,
228–200, 228–201, 228–202, and 228–
212 airplanes. This proposed AD would
require you to repetitively inspect the
wiring in the flight deck overhead
panels (locations 5VE and 6VE) for
chafing and damage and repair any
chafed or damaged wires. Regardless of
the results of each inspection, this
proposed AD would require you to
assure correct installation of the wiring
in the flight deck overhead panels by
reattaching or replacing the wire tie
attachment holders and securing any
loose wires to the wire tie attachment
holders with plastic wire ties. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) issued by the airworthiness
authority for Germany. We are
proposing this AD to detect, correct, and
prevent chafed or damaged wires in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:38 Mar 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
15647
flight deck overhead panels, which
could result in short-circuiting of
related wiring. This condition could
lead to electrical failure of affected
systems and potential fire in the flight
deck.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 27, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this proposed
AD:
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://
dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions
for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact RUAG
Services GmbH, P.O. Box 1253, D–
82231 Wessling; telephone: (08153)
302506; fax: (08153) 304601.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl
Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4146; fax: (816)
329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
Comments Invited
Foreign Airworthiness Authority
Information
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number, ‘‘FAA–2006–24095; Directorate
Identifier 2006–CE–21–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
concerning this proposed AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Luftfahrt-Bundesamt (LBA),
which is the airworthiness authority for
Germany, notified FAA that an unsafe
condition may exist on all DORNIER
Models 228–100, 228–101, 228–200,
228–201, 228–202, and 228–212
airplanes. The LBA reports that
vibrations are causing the plastic wire
tie attachment holder in the flight deck
overhead panels to lose its adhesiveness
and become detached.
When the wire tie attachment holder
becomes detached, the wiring in the
flight deck overhead panels is loose and
may rub against the pins of the switches
in the overhead panel causing chafing
and damage to the wiring insulation.
This condition, if not corrected, could
result in electrical failure of affected
systems and potential fire in the flight
deck.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed RUAG AOT
Dornier 228, All Operators Telefax
service information No. AOT–228–24–
028, Date of Issue: November 9, 2005.
The service information specifies:
• Repetitively inspecting the wiring
in the flight deck overhead panels
(locations 5VE and 6VE) for chafing and
damage;
• Repairing any chafed or damaged
wire(s); and
• Assuring correct installation of the
wiring in the flight deck overhead
panels by reattaching or replacing the
wire tie attachment holders and
securing any loose wires to the wire tie
attachment holders with plastic wire
ties.
The LBA classified the service
information as mandatory and issued
German AD Number D–2005–438,
Effective Date: December 14, 2005, to
ensure the continued airworthiness of
these airplanes in Germany.
These DORNIER Models 228–100,
228–101, 228–200, 228–201, 228–202,
and 228–212 airplanes are
manufactured in Germany and are typecertificated for operation in the United
States under the provisions of section
21.29 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the
applicable bilateral airworthiness
agreement.
Under this bilateral airworthiness
agreement, the LBA has kept us
informed of the situation described
above.
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 29, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15645-15647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-4511]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM342; Notice No. 25-06-03-SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Model A380-800 Airplane, Extendable
Length Escape System
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice proposes special conditions for the Airbus A380-
800 airplane. This airplane will have novel or unusual design features
when compared to the state of technology envisioned in the
airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes. Many of these
novel or unusual design features are associated with the complex
systems and the configuration of the airplane, including its full-
length double deck. For these design features, the applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards regarding extendable length escape slides. These proposed
special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
Additional special conditions will be issued for other novel or unusual
design features of the Airbus Model A380-800 airplane.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 15, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this proposal may be mailed in duplicate to:
Federal Aviation Administration, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Attention: Rules Docket (ANM-113), Docket No. NM342, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; or delivered in duplicate to the
Transport Airplane Directorate at the above address. All comments must
be marked: Docket No. NM342. Comments may be inspected in the Rules
Docket weekdays, except Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Holly Thorson, FAA, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone
(425) 227-1357; facsimile (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. The most
helpful comments reference a specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send us two copies of written
comments.
We will file in the docket all comments we receive as well as a
report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning these proposed special conditions. The docket is available
for public inspection before and after the comment closing date. If you
wish to review the docket in person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES
section of this notice between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing
date for comments. We will consider comments filed late, if it is
possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change the
proposed special conditions in light of the comments we receive.
If you want the FAA to acknowledge receipt of your comments on this
proposal, include with your comments a pre-addressed, stamped postcard
on which the docket number appears. We will stamp the date on the
postcard and mail it back to you.
Background
Airbus applied for FAA certification/validation of the
provisionally-designated Model A3XX-100 in its letter AI/L 810.0223/98,
dated August 12, 1998, to the FAA. Application for certification by the
Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) of Europe had been made on January 16,
1998, reference AI/L 810.0019/98. In its letter to the FAA, Airbus
requested an extension to the 5-year period for type certification in
accordance with 14 CFR 21.17(c). The request was for an extension to a
7-year period, using the date of the initial application letter to the
JAA as the reference date. The reason given by Airbus for the request
for extension is related to the technical challenges, complexity, and
the number of new and novel features on the airplane. On November 12,
1998, the Manager, Aircraft Engineering Division, AIR-100, granted
Airbus' request for the 7-year period, based on the date of application
to the JAA.
In its letter AI/LE-A 828.0040/99 Issue 3, dated July 20, 2001,
Airbus stated that its target date for type certification of the Model
A380-800 had been moved from May 2005, to January 2006, to match the
delivery date of the first production airplane. In a subsequent letter
(AI/L 810.0223/98 issue 3, dated January 27, 2006), Airbus stated that
its target date for type certification is October 2, 2006. In
accordance with 14 CFR 21.17(d)(2), Airbus chose a new application date
of December 20, 1999, and requested that the 7-year certification
period which had already been approved be continued. The FAA has
reviewed the part 25 certification basis for the Model A380-800
airplane, and no changes are required based on the new application
date.
The Model A380-800 airplane will be an all-new, four-engine jet
transport airplane with a full double-deck, two-aisle cabin. The
maximum takeoff weight will be 1.235 million pounds with a typical
three-class layout of 555 passengers.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Airbus must show that the
Model A380-800 airplane meets the applicable provisions of 14 CFR part
25, as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-98. If the Administrator
finds that the applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards for the Airbus A380-800
airplane because of novel or unusual design features, special
conditions are prescribed under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.16.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Airbus Model A380-800 airplane must comply with the
fuel vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the
noise certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36. In addition, the
FAA must issue a finding of regulatory adequacy pursuant to section 611
of Public Law 93-574, the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
Special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, are issued in
accordance with 14 CFR 11.38 and become part of the type certification
basis in
[[Page 15646]]
accordance with 14 CFR 21.17(a)(2), Amendment 21-69, effective
September 16, 1991.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the
other model under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101.
Discussion of Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Airbus Model A380-800 airplane has 16 emergency exits and 16
escape slides to be used for evacuation of passengers in case of
emergency. Of these, 14 are fixed-length escape slides, and two (at
door M1) are extendable length escape slides. The extendable length
escape slides have a 16-foot extension packed at the toe.
Typically, airplanes have fixed length escape slides. However, it
was not possible to use fixed length escape slides for the A380 door M1
because of the extreme difference between normal sill height and high
sill height associated with collapse of some of the landing gear in an
emergency. Some combinations of landing gear collapse could cause the
airplane to tip back on its tail.
On the door, there is an electronic sensor that evaluates the
attitude of the airplane and determines whether the extension is
needed. During normal operation, the extension remains packed at the
toe end of the escape slide. When the extension is needed, the system
sends a signal to a squib that allows the extension to be inflated
during deployment. If the system detects that the slide extension has
failed to deploy, a warning is activated that tells the flight
attendants that the slide should not be used. The warning will also
activate--if after initial deployment of the slide without the
extension deploying--the attitude of the airplane changes to the extent
that the extension should be deployed. The slide system design cannot
accommodate deploying the extension after deployment of the main body
of the slide.
The performance requirements for escape systems are contained in 14
CFR 25.810 and address several abnormal operating conditions as well as
failure conditions and reliability. The requirements of Sec. 25.810
remain applicable for the slide in the unextended mode, and for the
most part, in the extended mode. The special conditions indicate where
the requirements differ from the requirements of Sec. 25.810 for the
slide in the extended mode.
The extension is intended only for use at high sill heights. A
typical fixed-length slide operating at high sill height does not
satisfy all of the performance requirements of Sec. 25.810, but its
variations in performance are understood and largely predictable.
Certain performance criteria are valid regardless of sill height,
whereas other aspects of performance can be expected to decline at
higher sill heights. With an extendable slide, there is a step change
in configuration and potentially a step change in performance.
Therefore, special conditions are needed to ensure acceptable
performance in the extended mode. Section 25.810 specifies the basic
performance requirements for escape slides including wind testing,
repeatability testing, and testing at adverse sill heights. Section
25.1309(a) requires that systems perform under foreseeable operating
conditions, such as extreme temperatures, and a demonstration that the
system design is appropriate for its intended function. Standards for
the equipment itself are contained in Technical Standard Order C69c and
contribute to a satisfactory installation.
Existing 14 CFR part 25 regulations governing the certification of
the A380 do not adequately address certification requirements of an
extendable length escape slide. The FAA is proposing special conditions
to ensure that an extendable length escape slide performs adequately in
both the unextended and the extended configuration.
Technical Standard Order C69c addresses many detailed aspects of
escape slide performance that are not specified in 14 CFR part 25 but
are generally considered essential to assuring adequate escape slide
performance. These special conditions supplement the requirements of 14
CFR part 25, for the slide in its extended mode. However, because of
the novel nature of this design, the special conditions will require
that the escape slide receive TSO authorization or satisfy an
equivalent standard.
Wind tests are typically conducted only on fixed length slides at
normal sill height. Since the regulations require that the 25 knot
standard is met at the most critical wind angle, escape slides usually
exceed 25 knots performance at other than the critical angle. The same
is expected to be true of the slide in its extended mode, but some
reduction in the required wind velocity is appropriate since the slide
will be in an abnormal condition. Available data indicates that a value
of 22 knots is appropriate to cover the slide in its extended mode at
normal sill height. This corresponds to roughly 75% of the wind energy
required for the slide in its normal attitude and will ensure that the
slide can function in its extended mode at least as well as a fixed
length slide under similar abnormal conditions.
The special conditions also specify a rate for evacuation of
passengers which is consistent with that of fixed length escape slides.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Airbus A380-800 airplane. Should Airbus apply at a later date for a
change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating
the same novel or unusual design features, these special conditions
would apply to that model as well under the provisions of Sec. 21.101.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
of the Airbus A380-800 airplane. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of the type certification basis
for the Airbus A380-800 airplane.
In addition to the provisions of 14 CFR part 25, the following
special conditions apply:
1. The extendable escape slide must receive TSO C69c authorization
or the equivalent.
2. In addition to the requirements of Sec. 25.810(a)(1)(iii) for
usability in conditions of landing gear collapse, the deployed escape
slide in the extended mode must demonstrate an evacuation rate of 45
persons per minute per lane at the sill height corresponding to
activation of the extension.
3. In lieu of the requirements of Sec. 25.810(a)(1)(iv), the
escape slide deployed in the extended mode must be capable of being
used in 22 knot winds directed from the critical angle, with the
airplane on all its landing gear.
4. Pitch sensor tolerances and accuracy must be taken into account
when demonstrating compliance with
[[Page 15647]]
Sec. 25.1309(a) for the escape slide in both the extended and
unextended modes.
5. Design of the ``slide extension'' warning must be such that the
cabin crew is made aware of a non usable slide (i.e., the main slide
has deployed, and the door sill height is such that the extension
should be deployed but cannot be deployed), even if this is due to the
airplane attitude changing during the evacuation. The ability to
provide such a warning must be available for ten minutes after the
airplane is immobilized on the ground.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 20, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-4511 Filed 3-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P