Special Conditions: Airbus Model A380-800 Airplane, Design Roll Maneuver, 15643-15645 [E6-4509]
Download as PDF
15643
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Grades U.S. Nos.
Grading factors
1
Soybeans of other colors 1 ...............................................................................................................
2
1.0
3
2.0
4
5.0
10.0
Maximum count limits of:
Other material:
Animal filth ........................................................................................................................................
Caster beans ....................................................................................................................................
Crotalaria seeds ...............................................................................................................................
Glass .................................................................................................................................................
Stones 2 .............................................................................................................................................
Unknown foreign substance .............................................................................................................
9
1
2
0
3
3
9
1
2
0
3
3
9
1
2
0
3
3
9
1
2
0
3
3
Total 3 .........................................................................................................................................
10
10
10
10
U.S. Sample grade is Soybeans that:
(a) Does not meet the requirements for U.S. Nos. 1, 2, 3, or 4; or
(b) Have a musty, sour, or commercially objectionable foreign odor (except smut or garlic odor); or
(c) Are heating or of distinctly low quality.
1 Disregard
for Mixed soybeans.
addition to the maximum count limit, stones must exceed 0.1 percent of the sample weight.
3 Includes any combination of animal filth, castor beans, crotalaria seeds, glass, stones, and unknown substances. The weight of stones is not
applicable for total other material.
2 In
James E. Link,
Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration.
[FR Doc. 06–2967 Filed 3–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–EN–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM340; Notice No. 25–06–01–
SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Model
A380–800 Airplane, Design Roll
Maneuver
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice proposes special
conditions for the Airbus A380–800
airplane. This airplane will have novel
or unusual design features when
compared to the state of technology
envisioned in the airworthiness
standards for transport category
airplanes. Many of these novel or
unusual design features are associated
with the complex systems and the
configuration of the airplane, including
its full-length double deck. For these
design features, the applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for design roll maneuvers. These
proposed special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:38 Mar 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards. Additional
special conditions will be issued for
other novel or unusual design features
of the Airbus Model A380–800 airplane.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 15, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this proposal
may be mailed in duplicate to: Federal
Aviation Administration, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Attention: Rules
Docket (ANM–113), Docket No. NM340,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98055–4056; or delivered in
duplicate to the Transport Airplane
Directorate at the above address. All
comments must be marked: Docket No.
NM340. Comments may be inspected in
the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Holly Thorson, FAA, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055–4056;
telephone (425) 227–1357; facsimile
(425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written comments, data, or
views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
special conditions, explain the reason
for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. We ask that
you send us two copies of written
comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive as well as a report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning
these proposed special conditions. The
docket is available for public inspection
before and after the comment closing
date. If you wish to review the docket
in person, go to the address in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice
between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late, if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change the proposed special
conditions in light of the comments we
receive.
If you want the FAA to acknowledge
receipt of your comments on this
proposal, include with your comments
a pre-addressed, stamped postcard on
which the docket number appears. We
will stamp the date on the postcard and
mail it back to you.
Background
Airbus applied for FAA certification/
validation of the provisionally
designated Model A3XX–100 in its
letter AI/L 810.0223/98, dated August
12, 1998, to the FAA. Application for
certification by the Joint Aviation
Authorities (JAA) of Europe had been
made on January 16, 1998, reference AI/
L 810.0019/98. In its letter to the FAA,
Airbus requested an extension to the 5year period for type certification in
accordance with 14 CFR 21.17(c). The
request was for an extension to a 7-year
period, using the date of the initial
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
15644
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2006 / Proposed Rules
hsrobinson on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
application letter to the JAA as the
reference date. The reason given by
Airbus for the request for extension is
related to the technical challenges,
complexity, and the number of new and
novel features on the airplane. On
November 12, 1998, the Manager,
Aircraft Engineering Division, AIR–100,
granted Airbus’ request for the 7-year
period, based on the date of application
to the JAA.
In its letter AI/LE–A 828.0040/99
Issue 3, dated July 20, 2001, Airbus
stated that its target date for type
certification of the Model A380–800 had
been moved from May 2005, to January
2006, to match the delivery date of the
first production airplane. In a
subsequent letter (AI/L 810.0223/98
issue 3, dated January 27, 2006), Airbus
stated that its target date for type
certification is October 2, 2006. In
accordance with 14 CFR 21.17(d)(2),
Airbus chose a new application date of
December 20, 1999, and requested that
the 7-year certification period which
had already been approved be
continued. The FAA has reviewed the
part 25 certification basis for the Model
A380–800 airplane, and no changes are
required based on the new application
date.
The Model A380–800 airplane will be
an all-new, four-engine jet transport
airplane with a full double-deck, twoaisle cabin. The maximum takeoff
weight will be 1.235 million pounds
with a typical three-class layout of 555
passengers.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17,
Airbus must show that the Model A380–
800 airplane meets the applicable
provisions of 14 CFR part 25, as
amended by Amendments 25–1 through
25–98. If the Administrator finds that
the applicable airworthiness regulations
do not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for the Airbus A380–
800 airplane because of novel or
unusual design features, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of 14 CFR 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Airbus Model A380–800
airplane must comply with the fuel vent
and exhaust emission requirements of
14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR
part 36. In addition, the FAA must issue
a finding of regulatory adequacy
pursuant to section 611 of Public Law
93–574, the ‘‘Noise Control Act of
1972.’’
Special conditions, as defined in 14
CFR 11.19, are issued in accordance
with 14 CFR 11.38 and become part of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:38 Mar 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
the type certification basis in
accordance with 14 CFR 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101.
Discussion of Novel or Unusual Design
Features
The A380 is equipped with an
electronic flight control system. In this
system, there is not a direct mechanical
link between the airplane flight control
surface and the pilot’s cockpit control
device as there is on more conventional
airplanes. Instead, a flight control
computer commands the airplane flight
control surfaces, based on input
received from the cockpit control
device. The pilot input is modified by
the flight control computer—based on
the current airplane flight parameters
before the command is given to the
flight control surface. Therefore, there is
not a direct mechanical relationship
between the pilot command and the
command given to the control surface.
The formulation of airplane design
load conditions in 14 CFR part 25 is
based on the assumption that the
airplane is equipped with a control
system in which there is a direct
mechanical linkage between the pilot’s
cockpit control and the control surface.
Thus for roll maneuvers, the regulation
specifies a displacement for the aileron
itself, and does not envision any
modification of the pilot’s control input.
Since such a system will affect the
airplane flight loads and thus the
structural strength of the airplane,
special conditions appropriate for this
type of control system are needed.
In particular, the proposed special
condition would adjust the design roll
maneuver requirements specified in
§ 25.349(a), so that they take into
account the effect of the A380’s
electronic flight control computer on the
control surface deflection. The proposed
special condition would require that the
roll maneuver be performed by
deflection of the cockpit roll control, as
opposed to specifying a deflection of the
aileron itself as the current regulation
does. The deflection of the control
surface would then be determined from
the cockpit input, based on the
computer’s flight control laws and the
current airplane flight parameters.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Airbus
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A380–800 airplane. Should Airbus
apply at a later date for a change to the
type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design features, these special
conditions would apply to that model as
well under the provisions of § 21.101.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features of the Airbus
A380–800 airplane. It is not a rule of
general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special condition as part of
the type certification basis for the
Airbus A380–800 airplane.
In lieu of compliance with 14 CFR
25.349(a), the following special
condition is proposed:
The following conditions, speeds, and
cockpit roll control motions (except as
the motions may be limited by pilot
effort) must be considered in
combination with an airplane load
factor of zero and two-thirds of the
positive maneuvering factor used in
design. In determining the resulting
control surface deflections, the torsional
flexibility of the wing must be
considered in accordance with
§ 25.301(b):
a. Conditions corresponding to steady
rolling velocities must be investigated.
In addition, conditions corresponding to
maximum angular acceleration must be
investigated for airplanes with engines
or other weight concentrations outboard
of the fuselage. For the angular
acceleration conditions, zero rolling
velocity may be assumed in the absence
of a rational time history investigation
of the maneuver.
b. At VA, sudden movement of the
cockpit roll control up to the limit is
assumed. The position of the cockpit
roll control must be maintained, until a
steady roll rate is achieved and then
must be returned suddenly to the
neutral position.
c. At VC, the cockpit roll control must
be moved suddenly and maintained so
as to achieve a roll rate not less than
that obtained in paragraph b. above.
d. At VD, the cockpit roll control must
be moved suddenly and maintained so
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 29, 2006 / Proposed Rules
as to achieve a roll rate not less than one
third of that obtained in paragraph b.
above.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
20, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–4509 Filed 3–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM342; Notice No. 25–06–03–
SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Model
A380–800 Airplane, Extendable Length
Escape System
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice proposes special
conditions for the Airbus A380–800
airplane. This airplane will have novel
or unusual design features when
compared to the state of technology
envisioned in the airworthiness
standards for transport category
airplanes. Many of these novel or
unusual design features are associated
with the complex systems and the
configuration of the airplane, including
its full-length double deck. For these
design features, the applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
regarding extendable length escape
slides. These proposed special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
Additional special conditions will be
issued for other novel or unusual design
features of the Airbus Model A380–800
airplane.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 15, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this proposal
may be mailed in duplicate to: Federal
Aviation Administration, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Attention: Rules
Docket (ANM–113), Docket No. NM342,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98055–4056; or delivered in
duplicate to the Transport Airplane
Directorate at the above address. All
comments must be marked: Docket No.
NM342. Comments may be inspected in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:38 Mar 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Holly Thorson, FAA, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055–4056;
telephone (425) 227–1357; facsimile
(425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written comments, data, or
views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
special conditions, explain the reason
for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. We ask that
you send us two copies of written
comments.
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive as well as a report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning
these proposed special conditions. The
docket is available for public inspection
before and after the comment closing
date. If you wish to review the docket
in person, go to the address in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice
between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late, if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change the proposed special
conditions in light of the comments we
receive.
If you want the FAA to acknowledge
receipt of your comments on this
proposal, include with your comments
a pre-addressed, stamped postcard on
which the docket number appears. We
will stamp the date on the postcard and
mail it back to you.
Background
Airbus applied for FAA certification/
validation of the provisionallydesignated Model A3XX–100 in its
letter AI/L 810.0223/98, dated August
12, 1998, to the FAA. Application for
certification by the Joint Aviation
Authorities (JAA) of Europe had been
made on January 16, 1998, reference
AI/L 810.0019/98. In its letter to the
FAA, Airbus requested an extension to
the 5-year period for type certification
in accordance with 14 CFR 21.17(c). The
request was for an extension to a 7-year
period, using the date of the initial
application letter to the JAA as the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15645
reference date. The reason given by
Airbus for the request for extension is
related to the technical challenges,
complexity, and the number of new and
novel features on the airplane. On
November 12, 1998, the Manager,
Aircraft Engineering Division, AIR–100,
granted Airbus’ request for the 7-year
period, based on the date of application
to the JAA.
In its letter AI/LE–A 828.0040/99
Issue 3, dated July 20, 2001, Airbus
stated that its target date for type
certification of the Model A380–800 had
been moved from May 2005, to January
2006, to match the delivery date of the
first production airplane. In a
subsequent letter (AI/L 810.0223/98
issue 3, dated January 27, 2006), Airbus
stated that its target date for type
certification is October 2, 2006. In
accordance with 14 CFR 21.17(d)(2),
Airbus chose a new application date of
December 20, 1999, and requested that
the 7-year certification period which
had already been approved be
continued. The FAA has reviewed the
part 25 certification basis for the Model
A380–800 airplane, and no changes are
required based on the new application
date.
The Model A380–800 airplane will be
an all-new, four-engine jet transport
airplane with a full double-deck, twoaisle cabin. The maximum takeoff
weight will be 1.235 million pounds
with a typical three-class layout of 555
passengers.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17,
Airbus must show that the Model A380–
800 airplane meets the applicable
provisions of 14 CFR part 25, as
amended by Amendments 25–1 through
25–98. If the Administrator finds that
the applicable airworthiness regulations
do not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for the Airbus A380–
800 airplane because of novel or
unusual design features, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of 14 CFR 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Airbus Model A380–800
airplane must comply with the fuel vent
and exhaust emission requirements of
14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR
part 36. In addition, the FAA must issue
a finding of regulatory adequacy
pursuant to section 611 of Public Law
93–574, the ‘‘Noise Control Act of
1972.’’
Special conditions, as defined in 14
CFR 11.19, are issued in accordance
with 14 CFR 11.38 and become part of
the type certification basis in
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 29, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15643-15645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-4509]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM340; Notice No. 25-06-01-SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Model A380-800 Airplane, Design Roll
Maneuver
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice proposes special conditions for the Airbus A380-
800 airplane. This airplane will have novel or unusual design features
when compared to the state of technology envisioned in the
airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes. Many of these
novel or unusual design features are associated with the complex
systems and the configuration of the airplane, including its full-
length double deck. For these design features, the applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for design roll maneuvers. These proposed special conditions
contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that
established by the existing airworthiness standards. Additional special
conditions will be issued for other novel or unusual design features of
the Airbus Model A380-800 airplane.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 15, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this proposal may be mailed in duplicate to:
Federal Aviation Administration, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Attention: Rules Docket (ANM-113), Docket No. NM340, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; or delivered in duplicate to the
Transport Airplane Directorate at the above address. All comments must
be marked: Docket No. NM340. Comments may be inspected in the Rules
Docket weekdays, except Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Holly Thorson, FAA, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone
(425) 227-1357; facsimile (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. The most
helpful comments reference a specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send us two copies of written
comments.
We will file in the docket all comments we receive as well as a
report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning these proposed special conditions. The docket is available
for public inspection before and after the comment closing date. If you
wish to review the docket in person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES
section of this notice between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing
date for comments. We will consider comments filed late, if it is
possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change the
proposed special conditions in light of the comments we receive.
If you want the FAA to acknowledge receipt of your comments on this
proposal, include with your comments a pre-addressed, stamped postcard
on which the docket number appears. We will stamp the date on the
postcard and mail it back to you.
Background
Airbus applied for FAA certification/validation of the
provisionally designated Model A3XX-100 in its letter AI/L 810.0223/98,
dated August 12, 1998, to the FAA. Application for certification by the
Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) of Europe had been made on January 16,
1998, reference AI/L 810.0019/98. In its letter to the FAA, Airbus
requested an extension to the 5-year period for type certification in
accordance with 14 CFR 21.17(c). The request was for an extension to a
7-year period, using the date of the initial
[[Page 15644]]
application letter to the JAA as the reference date. The reason given
by Airbus for the request for extension is related to the technical
challenges, complexity, and the number of new and novel features on the
airplane. On November 12, 1998, the Manager, Aircraft Engineering
Division, AIR-100, granted Airbus' request for the 7-year period, based
on the date of application to the JAA.
In its letter AI/LE-A 828.0040/99 Issue 3, dated July 20, 2001,
Airbus stated that its target date for type certification of the Model
A380-800 had been moved from May 2005, to January 2006, to match the
delivery date of the first production airplane. In a subsequent letter
(AI/L 810.0223/98 issue 3, dated January 27, 2006), Airbus stated that
its target date for type certification is October 2, 2006. In
accordance with 14 CFR 21.17(d)(2), Airbus chose a new application date
of December 20, 1999, and requested that the 7-year certification
period which had already been approved be continued. The FAA has
reviewed the part 25 certification basis for the Model A380-800
airplane, and no changes are required based on the new application
date.
The Model A380-800 airplane will be an all-new, four-engine jet
transport airplane with a full double-deck, two-aisle cabin. The
maximum takeoff weight will be 1.235 million pounds with a typical
three-class layout of 555 passengers.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Airbus must show that the
Model A380-800 airplane meets the applicable provisions of 14 CFR part
25, as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-98. If the Administrator
finds that the applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards for the Airbus A380-800
airplane because of novel or unusual design features, special
conditions are prescribed under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.16.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Airbus Model A380-800 airplane must comply with the
fuel vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the
noise certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36. In addition, the
FAA must issue a finding of regulatory adequacy pursuant to section 611
of Public Law 93-574, the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
Special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, are issued in
accordance with 14 CFR 11.38 and become part of the type certification
basis in accordance with 14 CFR 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the
other model under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101.
Discussion of Novel or Unusual Design Features
The A380 is equipped with an electronic flight control system. In
this system, there is not a direct mechanical link between the airplane
flight control surface and the pilot's cockpit control device as there
is on more conventional airplanes. Instead, a flight control computer
commands the airplane flight control surfaces, based on input received
from the cockpit control device. The pilot input is modified by the
flight control computer--based on the current airplane flight
parameters before the command is given to the flight control surface.
Therefore, there is not a direct mechanical relationship between the
pilot command and the command given to the control surface.
The formulation of airplane design load conditions in 14 CFR part
25 is based on the assumption that the airplane is equipped with a
control system in which there is a direct mechanical linkage between
the pilot's cockpit control and the control surface. Thus for roll
maneuvers, the regulation specifies a displacement for the aileron
itself, and does not envision any modification of the pilot's control
input. Since such a system will affect the airplane flight loads and
thus the structural strength of the airplane, special conditions
appropriate for this type of control system are needed.
In particular, the proposed special condition would adjust the
design roll maneuver requirements specified in Sec. 25.349(a), so that
they take into account the effect of the A380's electronic flight
control computer on the control surface deflection. The proposed
special condition would require that the roll maneuver be performed by
deflection of the cockpit roll control, as opposed to specifying a
deflection of the aileron itself as the current regulation does. The
deflection of the control surface would then be determined from the
cockpit input, based on the computer's flight control laws and the
current airplane flight parameters.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Airbus A380-800 airplane. Should Airbus apply at a later date for a
change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating
the same novel or unusual design features, these special conditions
would apply to that model as well under the provisions of Sec. 21.101.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
of the Airbus A380-800 airplane. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special condition as part of the type certification basis for
the Airbus A380-800 airplane.
In lieu of compliance with 14 CFR 25.349(a), the following special
condition is proposed:
The following conditions, speeds, and cockpit roll control motions
(except as the motions may be limited by pilot effort) must be
considered in combination with an airplane load factor of zero and two-
thirds of the positive maneuvering factor used in design. In
determining the resulting control surface deflections, the torsional
flexibility of the wing must be considered in accordance with Sec.
25.301(b):
a. Conditions corresponding to steady rolling velocities must be
investigated. In addition, conditions corresponding to maximum angular
acceleration must be investigated for airplanes with engines or other
weight concentrations outboard of the fuselage. For the angular
acceleration conditions, zero rolling velocity may be assumed in the
absence of a rational time history investigation of the maneuver.
b. At VA, sudden movement of the cockpit roll control up
to the limit is assumed. The position of the cockpit roll control must
be maintained, until a steady roll rate is achieved and then must be
returned suddenly to the neutral position.
c. At VC, the cockpit roll control must be moved
suddenly and maintained so as to achieve a roll rate not less than that
obtained in paragraph b. above.
d. At VD, the cockpit roll control must be moved
suddenly and maintained so
[[Page 15645]]
as to achieve a roll rate not less than one third of that obtained in
paragraph b. above.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 20, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-4509 Filed 3-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P