Outer Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for California, 14662-14665 [E6-4204]
Download as PDF
14662
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 56 / Thursday, March 23, 2006 / Proposed Rules
State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the CAA. Thus, the requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not
apply. This proposed rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 16, 2006.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. E6–4199 Filed 3–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 55
[OAR–2006–0091; FRL–8048–4]
Outer Continental Shelf Air
Regulations Consistency Update for
California
Environmental Protection
Agency (‘‘EPA’’).
ACTION: Proposed rule—consistency
update.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to update a
portion of the Outer Continental Shelf
(‘‘OCS’’) Air Regulations. Requirements
applying to OCS sources located within
25 miles of States’ seaward boundaries
must be updated periodically to remain
consistent with the requirements of the
corresponding onshore area (‘‘COA’’), as
mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the
Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (‘‘the
Act’’). The portion of the OCS air
regulations that is being updated
pertains to the requirements for OCS
sources by the Ventura County Air
Pollution Control District (Ventura
County APCD). The intended effect of
approving the OCS requirements for the
Ventura County APCD is to regulate
emissions from OCS sources in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Mar 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
accordance with the requirements
onshore. The change to the existing
requirements discussed below is
proposed to be incorporated by
reference into the Code of Federal
Regulations and is listed in the
appendix to the OCS air regulations.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by
April 24, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number OAR–
2006–0091, by one of the following
methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air–4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send e-mail
directly to EPA, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the public comment.
If EPA cannot read your comment due
to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may
not be able to consider your comment.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard
copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Allen, Air Division (Air–4),
U.S. EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415)
947–4120, allen.cynthia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
I. Background Information
A. Why Is EPA Taking This Action?
On September 4, 1992, EPA
promulgated 40 CFR part 55,1 which
established requirements to control air
pollution from OCS sources in order to
attain and maintain federal and state
ambient air quality standards and to
comply with the provisions of part C of
title I of the Act. Part 55 applies to all
OCS sources offshore of the States
except those located in the Gulf of
Mexico west of 87.5 degrees longitude.
Section 328 of the Act requires that for
such sources located within 25 miles of
a State’s seaward boundary, the
requirements shall be the same as would
be applicable if the sources were located
in the COA. Because the OCS
requirements are based on onshore
requirements, and onshore requirements
may change, section 328(a)(1) requires
that EPA update the OCS requirements
as necessary to maintain consistency
with onshore requirements.
Pursuant to § 55.12 of the OCS rule,
consistency reviews will occur (1) at
least annually; (2) upon receipt of a
Notice of Intent under § 55.4; or (3)
when a state or local agency submits a
rule to EPA to be considered for
incorporation by reference in part 55.
This proposed action is being taken in
response to the submittal of
requirements submitted by the Ventura
County APCD. Public comments
received in writing within 30 days of
publication of this document will be
considered by EPA before publishing a
final rule.
Section 328(a) of the Act requires that
EPA establish requirements to control
air pollution from OCS sources located
within 25 miles of States’ seaward
boundaries that are the same as onshore
requirements. To comply with this
statutory mandate, EPA must
incorporate applicable onshore rules
into part 55 as they exist onshore. This
limits EPA’s flexibility in deciding
which requirements will be
incorporated into part 55 and prevents
EPA from making substantive changes
to the requirements it incorporates. As
a result, EPA may be incorporating rules
into part 55 that do not conform to all
of EPA’s state implementation plan
(SIP) guidance or certain requirements
of the Act.
Consistency updates may result in the
inclusion of state or local rules or
regulations into part 55, even though the
1 The reader may refer to the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, December 5, 1991 (56 FR 63774), and
the preamble to the final rule promulgated
September 4, 1992 (57 FR 40792) for further
background and information on the OCS
regulations.
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 56 / Thursday, March 23, 2006 / Proposed Rules
same rules may ultimately be
disapproved for inclusion as part of the
SIP. Inclusion in the OCS rule does not
imply that a rule meets the requirements
of the Act for SIP approval, nor does it
imply that the rule will be approved by
EPA for inclusion in the SIP.
II. EPA’s Evaluation
A. What Criteria Were Used To Evaluate
Rules Submitted To Update 40 CFR Part
55?
In updating 40 CFR part 55, EPA
reviewed the rules submitted for
inclusion in part 55 to ensure that they
are rationally related to the attainment
or maintenance of federal or state
ambient air quality standards or part C
of title I of the Act, that they are not
designed expressly to prevent
exploration and development of the
OCS and that they are applicable to OCS
sources. 40 CFR 55.1. EPA has also
evaluated the rules to ensure they are
not arbitrary or capricious. 40 CFR 55.12
(e). In addition, EPA has excluded
administrative or procedural rules,2 and
requirements that regulate toxics which
are not related to the attainment and
maintenance of federal and state
ambient air quality standards.
B. What Requirements Were Submitted
To Update 40 CFR Part 55?
1. After review of the requirements
submitted by the Ventura County APCD
against the criteria set forth above and
in 40 CFR part 55, EPA is proposing to
make the following District
requirements applicable to OCS sources:
Adoption or
amended date
Rule No.
Name
42 .............................................................
72 .............................................................
73 .............................................................
74.9 ..........................................................
Permit Fees ............................................................................................................
New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) .......................................................
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) ..............
Stationary Internal Combustion Engines ................................................................
III. Administrative Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted this regulatory
action from Executive Order 12866,
entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review.’’
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
generally requires an agency to conduct
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements unless the
agency certifies that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses,
small not-for-profit enterprises, and
small governmental jurisdictions.
This rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities because SIP approvals under
section 110 and subchapter I, part D of
the Clean Air Act do not create any new
requirements but simply approve
requirements that the State is already
imposing. Therefore, because the
Federal SIP approval does not create
any new requirements, I certify that this
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Under sections 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(‘‘Unfunded Mandates Act’’), signed
into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must
prepare a budgetary impact statement to
accompany any proposed or final rule
that includes a Federal mandate that
may result in estimated costs to State,
local, or tribal governments in the
aggregate; or to the private sector, of
$100 million or more. Under section
205, EPA must select the most costeffective and least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203
requires EPA to establish a plan for
informing and advising any small
governments that may be significantly
or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the approval
action promulgated does not include a
Federal mandate that may result in
estimated costs of $100 million or more
to either State, local, or tribal
governments in the aggregate, or to the
private sector. This Federal action
approves pre-existing requirements
2 Each COA which has been delegated the
authority to implement and enforce part 55, will
use its administrative and procedural rules as
onshore. However, in those instances where EPA
has not delegated authority to implement and
enforce part 55, EPA will use its own administrative
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Moreover, due to the nature of the
Federal-State relationship under the
Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility
analysis would constitute Federal
inquiry into the economic
reasonableness of state action. The
Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its
actions concerning SIPs on such
grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA,
427 U.S. 246, 255–66 (1976); 42 U.S.C.
7410(a)(2).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Mar 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14663
04/12/05
09/13/05
09/13/05
11/08/05
under State or local law, and imposes
no new requirements. Accordingly, no
additional costs to State, local, or tribal
governments, or to the private sector,
result from this action.
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) revokes and replaces Executive
Orders 12612 (Federalism) and 12875
(Enhancing the Intergovernmental
Partnership). Executive Order 13132
requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’ Under
Executive Order 13132, EPA may not
issue a regulation that has federalism
implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs, and that is not
required by statute, unless the Federal
Government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by State and local
governments, or EPA consults with
State and local officials early in the
process of developing the proposed
regulation. EPA also may not issue a
regulation that has federalism
implications and that preempts State
law unless the Agency consults with
and procedural requirements to implement the
substantive requirements. 40 CFR 55.14 (c)(4).
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
14664
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 56 / Thursday, March 23, 2006 / Proposed Rules
State and local officials early in the
process of developing the proposed
regulation.
This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, because it
merely approves a state rule
implementing a federal standard, and
does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. Thus, the requirements of
section 6 of the Executive Order do not
apply to this rule.
F. Executive Order 13175, Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), requires EPA
to develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ This final rule does not
have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. It will not have
substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
applies to any rule that: (1) Is
determined to be ‘‘economically
significant’’ as defined under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that
EPA has reason to believe may have a
disproportionate effect on children. If
the regulatory action meets both criteria,
the Agency must evaluate the
environmental health or safety effects of
the planned rule on children, and
explain why the planned regulation is
preferable to other potentially effective
and reasonably feasible alternatives
considered by the Agency.
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13045 because it does not involve
decisions intended to mitigate
environmental health or safety risks.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Mar 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
H. Executive Order 13211, Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is
not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12 of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal
agencies to evaluate existing technical
standards when developing a new
regulation. To comply with NTTAA,
EPA must consider and use ‘‘voluntary
consensus standards’’ (VCS) if available
and applicable when developing
programs and policies unless doing so
would be inconsistent with applicable
law or otherwise impractical.
The EPA believes that VCS are
inapplicable to this action. Today’s
action does not require the public to
perform activities conducive to the use
of VCS.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 55
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Nitrogen oxides, Outer
Continental Shelf, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Permits, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides.
Dated: March 3, 2006.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Title 40, chapter I of the Code of
Federal Regulations, is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 55—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 55
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Section 328 of the Clean Air Act
(42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) as amended by Public
Law 101–549.
2. Section 55.14 is amended by
revising paragraph (e)(3)(ii)(H) to read as
follows:
§ 55.14 Requirements that apply to OCS
sources located within 25 miles of States’
seaward boundaries, by State.
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00008
*
Fmt 4702
*
Sfmt 4700
(H) Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District Requirements
Applicable to OCS Sources.
*
*
*
*
*
Appendix to Part 55—[Amended]
3. Appendix A to CFR Part 55 is
amended by revising paragraph (b)(8)
under the heading ‘‘California’’ to read
as follows:
Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 55—Listing
of State and Local Requirements
Incorporated by Reference Into Part 55,
by State
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
California
*
*
(b) * * *
(8) The following requirements are
contained in Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District Requirements Applicable to
OCS Sources:
Rule 2: Definitions (Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 5: Effective Date (Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 6: Severability (Adopted 11/21/78)
Rule 7: Zone Boundaries (Adopted 6/14/77)
Rule 10: Permits Required (Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 11: Definition for Regulation II
(Adopted 6/13/95)
Rule 12: Application for Permits (Adopted 6/
13/95)
Rule 13: Action on Applications for an
Authority to Construct (Adopted 6/13/95)
Rule 14: Action on Applications for a Permit
to Operate (Adopted 6/13/95)
Rule 15.1: Sampling and Testing Facilities
(Adopted 10/12/93)
Rule 16: BACT Certification (Adopted 6/13/
95)
Rule 19: Posting of Permits (Adopted 5/23/
72)
Rule 20: Transfer of Permit (Adopted 5/23/
72)
Rule 23: Exemptions from Permits (Revised
4/13/04)
Rule 24: Source Recordkeeping, Reporting,
and Emission Statements (Adopted 9/15/
92)
Rule 26: New Source Review (Adopted 10/
22/91)
Rule 26.1: New Source Review—Definitions
(Adopted 5/14/02)
Rule 26.2: New Source Review—
Requirements (Adopted 5/14/02)
Rule 26.3: New Source Review—Exemptions
(Adopted 5/14/02)
Rule 26.6: New Source Review—Calculations
(Adopted 5/14/02)
Rule 26.8: New Source Review—Permit To
Operate (Adopted 10/22/91)
Rule 26.10: New Source Review—PSD
(Adopted 1/13/98)
Rule 26.11: New Source Review—ERC
Evaluation At Time of Use (Adopted 5/14/
02)
Rule 28: Revocation of Permits (Adopted 7/
18/72)
Rule 29: Conditions on Permits (Adopted 10/
22/91)
Rule 30: Permit Renewal (Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 32: Breakdown Conditions: Emergency
Variances, A., B.1., and D. only. (Adopted
2/20/79)
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
14665
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 56 / Thursday, March 23, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Rule 33: Part 70 Permits—General (Adopted
10/12/93)
Rule 33.1: Part 70 Permits—Definitions
(Adopted 4/10/01)
Rule 33.2: Part 70 Permits—Application
Contents (Adopted 4/10/01)
Rule 33.3: Part 70 Permits—Permit Content
(Adopted 4/10/01)
Rule 33.4: Part 70 Permits—Operational
Flexibility (Adopted 4/10/01)
Rule 33.5: Part 70 Permits—Time frames for
Applications, Review and Issuance
(Adopted 10/12/93)
Rule 33.6: Part 70 Permits—Permit Term and
Permit Reissuance (Adopted 10/12/93)
Rule 33.7: Part 70 Permits—Notification
(Adopted 4/10/01)
Rule 33.8: Part 70 Permits—Reopening of
Permits (Adopted 10/12/93)
Rule 33.9: Part 70 Permits—Compliance
Provisions (Adopted 4/10/01)
Rule 33.10: Part 70 Permits—General Part 70
Permits (Adopted 10/12/93)
Rule 34: Acid Deposition Control (Adopted
3/14/95)
Rule 35: Elective Emission Limits (Adopted
11/12/96)
Rule 36: New Source Review—Hazardous Air
Pollutants (Adopted 10/6/98)
Rule 42: Permit Fees (Adopted 4/12/05)
Rule 44: Exemption Evaluation Fee (Adopted
9/10/96)
Rule 45: Plan Fees (Adopted 6/19/90)
Rule 45.2: Asbestos Removal Fees (Adopted
8/4/92)
Rule 47: Source Test, Emission Monitor, and
Call-Back Fees (Adopted 6/22/99)
Rule 50: Opacity (Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 52: Particulate Matter-Concentration
(Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 53: Particulate Matter-Process Weight
(Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 54: Sulfur Compounds (Adopted 6/14/
94)
Rule 56: Open Burning (Revised 11/11/03)
Rule 57: Incinerators (Adopted 1/11/05)
Rule 57.1: Particulate Matter Emissions From
Fuel Burning Equipment (Adopted 1/11/
05)
Rule 62.7: Asbestos—Demolition and
Renovation (Adopted 6/16/92)
Rule 63: Separation and Combination of
Emissions (Adopted 11/21/78)
Rule 64: Sulfur Content of Fuels (Adopted 4/
13/99)
Rule 67: Vacuum Producing Devices
(Adopted 7/5/83)
Rule 68: Carbon Monoxide (Adopted 4/13/
04)
Rule 71: Crude Oil and Reactive Organic
Compound Liquids (Adopted 12/13/94)
Rule 71.1: Crude Oil Production and
Separation (Adopted 6/16/92)
Rule 71.2: Storage of Reactive Organic
Compound Liquids (Adopted 9/26/89)
Rule 71.3: Transfer of Reactive Organic
Compound Liquids (Adopted 6/16/92)
Rule 71.4: Petroleum Sumps, Pits, Ponds, and
Well Cellars (Adopted 6/8/93)
Rule 71.5: Glycol Dehydrators (Adopted 12/
13/94)
Rule 72: New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) (Adopted 9/13/05)
Rule 73: National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS)
(Adopted 9/13/05)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Mar 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
Rule 74: Specific Source Standards (Adopted
7/6/76)
Rule 74.1: Abrasive Blasting (Adopted 11/12/
91)
Rule 74.2: Architectural Coatings (Adopted
11/13/01)
Rule 74.6: Surface Cleaning and Degreasing
(Revised 11/11/03—effective 7/1/04)
Rule 74.6.1: Batch Loaded Vapor Degreasers
(Adopted 11/11/03—effective 7/1/04)
Rule 74.7: Fugitive Emissions of Reactive
Organic Compounds at Petroleum
Refineries and Chemical Plants (Adopted
10/10/95)
Rule 74.8: Refinery Vacuum Producing
Systems, Waste-water Separators and
Process Turnarounds (Adopted 7/5/83)
Rule 74.9: Stationary Internal Combustion
Engines (Adopted 11/8/05)
Rule 74.10: Components at Crude Oil
Production Facilities and Natural Gas
Production and Processing Facilities
(Adopted 3/10/98)
Rule 74.11: Natural Gas-Fired Residential
Water Heaters—Control of NOX (Adopted
4/9/85)
Rule 74.11.1: Large Water Heaters and Small
Boilers (Adopted 9/14/99)
Rule 74.12: Surface Coating of Metal Parts
and Products (Adopted 11/11/03)
Rule 74.15: Boilers, Steam Generators and
Process Heaters (Adopted 11/8/94)
Rule 74.15.1: Boilers, Steam Generators and
Process Heaters (Adopted 6/13/00)
Rule 74.16: Oil Field Drilling Operations
(Adopted 1/8/91)
Rule 74.20: Adhesives and Sealants (Adopted
1/11/05)
Rule 74.23: Stationary Gas Turbines
(Adopted 1/08/02)
Rule 74.24: Marine Coating Operations
(Revised 11/11/03)
Rule 74.24.1: Pleasure Craft Coating and
Commercial Boatyard Operations (Adopted
1/08/02)
Rule 74.26: Crude Oil Storage Tank
Degassing Operations (Adopted 11/8/94)
Rule 74.27: Gasoline and ROC Liquid Storage
Tank Degassing Operations (Adopted 11/8/
94)
Rule 74.28: Asphalt Roofing Operations
(Adopted 5/10/94)
Rule 74.30: Wood Products Coatings (Revised
11/11/03)
Rule 75: Circumvention (Adopted 11/27/78)
Rule 101: Sampling and Testing Facilities
(Adopted 5/23/72)
Rule 102: Source Tests (Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 103: Continuous Monitoring Systems
(Adopted 2/9/99)
Rule 154: Stage 1 Episode Actions (Adopted
9/17/91)
Rule 155: Stage 2 Episode Actions (Adopted
9/17/91)
Rule 156: Stage 3 Episode Actions (Adopted
9/17/91)
Rule 158: Source Abatement Plans (Adopted
9/17/91)
Rule 159: Traffic Abatement Procedures
(Adopted 9/17/91)
Rule 220: General Conformity (Adopted 5/9/
95)
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Rule 230: Notice to Comply (Adopted 11/9/
99)
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E6–4204 Filed 3–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2004–0022; FRL–8047–6]
RIN 2050–AG29
NESHAP: National Emission Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Hazardous Waste Combustors
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On October 12, 2005, EPA
promulgated national emission
standards for hazardous air pollutants
(NESHAP) for new and existing
hazardous waste combustors.
Subsequently, the Administrator
received four petitions for
reconsideration of the final rule. In this
proposed rule, EPA is granting
reconsideration of one issue in the
petitions submitted by Ash Grove
Cement Company and the Cement Kiln
Recycling Coalition: The new source
standard for particulate matter (PM) for
cement kilns that burn hazardous waste.
We are requesting comment on a revised
new source particulate matter standard
for cement kilns. We are also requesting
comment on corresponding changes to
the new source particulate matter
standards for incinerators and liquid
fuel boilers.
DATES: Comments. Written comments
must be received by April 24, 2006,
unless a public hearing is requested by
April 3, 2006. If a hearing is requested,
written comments must be received by
May 8, 2006.
Public Hearing. If anyone contacts
EPA requesting to speak at a public
hearing by April 3, 2006, we will hold
a public hearing on April 7, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2004–0022, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.
• Fax: 202–566–1741.
• Mail: U.S. Postal Service, send
comments to: HQ EPA Docket Center
(6102T), Attention Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OAR–2004–0022, 1200
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14662-14665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-4204]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 55
[OAR-2006-0091; FRL-8048-4]
Outer Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for
California
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'').
ACTION: Proposed rule--consistency update.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to update a portion of the Outer Continental
Shelf (``OCS'') Air Regulations. Requirements applying to OCS sources
located within 25 miles of States' seaward boundaries must be updated
periodically to remain consistent with the requirements of the
corresponding onshore area (``COA''), as mandated by section 328(a)(1)
of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (``the Act''). The portion of
the OCS air regulations that is being updated pertains to the
requirements for OCS sources by the Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District (Ventura County APCD). The intended effect of
approving the OCS requirements for the Ventura County APCD is to
regulate emissions from OCS sources in accordance with the requirements
onshore. The change to the existing requirements discussed below is
proposed to be incorporated by reference into the Code of Federal
Regulations and is listed in the appendix to the OCS air regulations.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by April 24, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number OAR-2006-0091,
by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous
access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material), and some may not be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Allen, Air Division (Air-4),
U.S. EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415)
947-4120, allen.cynthia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background Information
A. Why Is EPA Taking This Action?
On September 4, 1992, EPA promulgated 40 CFR part 55,\1\ which
established requirements to control air pollution from OCS sources in
order to attain and maintain federal and state ambient air quality
standards and to comply with the provisions of part C of title I of the
Act. Part 55 applies to all OCS sources offshore of the States except
those located in the Gulf of Mexico west of 87.5 degrees longitude.
Section 328 of the Act requires that for such sources located within 25
miles of a State's seaward boundary, the requirements shall be the same
as would be applicable if the sources were located in the COA. Because
the OCS requirements are based on onshore requirements, and onshore
requirements may change, section 328(a)(1) requires that EPA update the
OCS requirements as necessary to maintain consistency with onshore
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The reader may refer to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
December 5, 1991 (56 FR 63774), and the preamble to the final rule
promulgated September 4, 1992 (57 FR 40792) for further background
and information on the OCS regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Sec. 55.12 of the OCS rule, consistency reviews will
occur (1) at least annually; (2) upon receipt of a Notice of Intent
under Sec. 55.4; or (3) when a state or local agency submits a rule to
EPA to be considered for incorporation by reference in part 55. This
proposed action is being taken in response to the submittal of
requirements submitted by the Ventura County APCD. Public comments
received in writing within 30 days of publication of this document will
be considered by EPA before publishing a final rule.
Section 328(a) of the Act requires that EPA establish requirements
to control air pollution from OCS sources located within 25 miles of
States' seaward boundaries that are the same as onshore requirements.
To comply with this statutory mandate, EPA must incorporate applicable
onshore rules into part 55 as they exist onshore. This limits EPA's
flexibility in deciding which requirements will be incorporated into
part 55 and prevents EPA from making substantive changes to the
requirements it incorporates. As a result, EPA may be incorporating
rules into part 55 that do not conform to all of EPA's state
implementation plan (SIP) guidance or certain requirements of the Act.
Consistency updates may result in the inclusion of state or local
rules or regulations into part 55, even though the
[[Page 14663]]
same rules may ultimately be disapproved for inclusion as part of the
SIP. Inclusion in the OCS rule does not imply that a rule meets the
requirements of the Act for SIP approval, nor does it imply that the
rule will be approved by EPA for inclusion in the SIP.
II. EPA's Evaluation
A. What Criteria Were Used To Evaluate Rules Submitted To Update 40 CFR
Part 55?
In updating 40 CFR part 55, EPA reviewed the rules submitted for
inclusion in part 55 to ensure that they are rationally related to the
attainment or maintenance of federal or state ambient air quality
standards or part C of title I of the Act, that they are not designed
expressly to prevent exploration and development of the OCS and that
they are applicable to OCS sources. 40 CFR 55.1. EPA has also evaluated
the rules to ensure they are not arbitrary or capricious. 40 CFR 55.12
(e). In addition, EPA has excluded administrative or procedural
rules,\2\ and requirements that regulate toxics which are not related
to the attainment and maintenance of federal and state ambient air
quality standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Each COA which has been delegated the authority to implement
and enforce part 55, will use its administrative and procedural
rules as onshore. However, in those instances where EPA has not
delegated authority to implement and enforce part 55, EPA will use
its own administrative and procedural requirements to implement the
substantive requirements. 40 CFR 55.14 (c)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. What Requirements Were Submitted To Update 40 CFR Part 55?
1. After review of the requirements submitted by the Ventura County
APCD against the criteria set forth above and in 40 CFR part 55, EPA is
proposing to make the following District requirements applicable to OCS
sources:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adoption or
Rule No. Name amended date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
42...................................... Permit Fees........................................ 04/12/05
72...................................... New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)............ 09/13/05
73...................................... National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 09/13/05
Pollutants (NESHAPS).
74.9.................................... Stationary Internal Combustion Engines............. 11/08/05
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Administrative Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this
regulatory action from Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory
Planning and Review.''
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small
businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental
jurisdictions.
This rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities because SIP approvals under section 110 and
subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new
requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is already
imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not create
any new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under
the Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility analysis would constitute
Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The
Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such
grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976);
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Under sections 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated
costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to
the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan
for informing and advising any small governments that may be
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not
include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100
million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the
aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves pre-
existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new
requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or
tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) revokes and replaces
Executive Orders 12612 (Federalism) and 12875 (Enhancing the
Intergovernmental Partnership). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to
develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies
that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' Under Executive Order 13132, EPA may not issue a
regulation that has federalism implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs, and that is not required by statute, unless
the Federal Government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct
compliance costs incurred by State and local governments, or EPA
consults with State and local officials early in the process of
developing the proposed regulation. EPA also may not issue a regulation
that has federalism implications and that preempts State law unless the
Agency consults with
[[Page 14664]]
State and local officials early in the process of developing the
proposed regulation.
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, because it
merely approves a state rule implementing a federal standard, and does
not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order do not apply to this
rule.
F. Executive Order 13175, Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' This final rule does not have
tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175. It will not
have substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule that: (1) Is
determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under
Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or
safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a disproportionate
effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the
Agency must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the
planned rule on children, and explain why the planned regulation is
preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible
alternatives considered by the Agency.
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does
not involve decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or
safety risks.
H. Executive Order 13211, Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12 of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal agencies to evaluate existing
technical standards when developing a new regulation. To comply with
NTTAA, EPA must consider and use ``voluntary consensus standards''
(VCS) if available and applicable when developing programs and policies
unless doing so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise
impractical.
The EPA believes that VCS are inapplicable to this action. Today's
action does not require the public to perform activities conducive to
the use of VCS.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 55
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Nitrogen oxides, Outer
Continental Shelf, Ozone, Particulate matter, Permits, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: March 3, 2006.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Title 40, chapter I of the Code of Federal Regulations, is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 55--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 55 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Section 328 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et
seq.) as amended by Public Law 101-549.
2. Section 55.14 is amended by revising paragraph (e)(3)(ii)(H) to
read as follows:
Sec. 55.14 Requirements that apply to OCS sources located within 25
miles of States' seaward boundaries, by State.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) * * *
(H) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District Requirements
Applicable to OCS Sources.
* * * * *
Appendix to Part 55--[Amended]
3. Appendix A to CFR Part 55 is amended by revising paragraph
(b)(8) under the heading ``California'' to read as follows:
Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 55--Listing of State and Local Requirements
Incorporated by Reference Into Part 55, by State
* * * * *
California
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(8) The following requirements are contained in Ventura County
Air Pollution Control District Requirements Applicable to OCS
Sources:
Rule 2: Definitions (Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 5: Effective Date (Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 6: Severability (Adopted 11/21/78)
Rule 7: Zone Boundaries (Adopted 6/14/77)
Rule 10: Permits Required (Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 11: Definition for Regulation II (Adopted 6/13/95)
Rule 12: Application for Permits (Adopted 6/13/95)
Rule 13: Action on Applications for an Authority to Construct
(Adopted 6/13/95)
Rule 14: Action on Applications for a Permit to Operate (Adopted 6/
13/95)
Rule 15.1: Sampling and Testing Facilities (Adopted 10/12/93)
Rule 16: BACT Certification (Adopted 6/13/95)
Rule 19: Posting of Permits (Adopted 5/23/72)
Rule 20: Transfer of Permit (Adopted 5/23/72)
Rule 23: Exemptions from Permits (Revised 4/13/04)
Rule 24: Source Recordkeeping, Reporting, and Emission Statements
(Adopted 9/15/92)
Rule 26: New Source Review (Adopted 10/22/91)
Rule 26.1: New Source Review--Definitions (Adopted 5/14/02)
Rule 26.2: New Source Review--Requirements (Adopted 5/14/02)
Rule 26.3: New Source Review--Exemptions (Adopted 5/14/02)
Rule 26.6: New Source Review--Calculations (Adopted 5/14/02)
Rule 26.8: New Source Review--Permit To Operate (Adopted 10/22/91)
Rule 26.10: New Source Review--PSD (Adopted 1/13/98)
Rule 26.11: New Source Review--ERC Evaluation At Time of Use
(Adopted 5/14/02)
Rule 28: Revocation of Permits (Adopted 7/18/72)
Rule 29: Conditions on Permits (Adopted 10/22/91)
Rule 30: Permit Renewal (Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 32: Breakdown Conditions: Emergency Variances, A., B.1., and D.
only. (Adopted 2/20/79)
[[Page 14665]]
Rule 33: Part 70 Permits--General (Adopted 10/12/93)
Rule 33.1: Part 70 Permits--Definitions (Adopted 4/10/01)
Rule 33.2: Part 70 Permits--Application Contents (Adopted 4/10/01)
Rule 33.3: Part 70 Permits--Permit Content (Adopted 4/10/01)
Rule 33.4: Part 70 Permits--Operational Flexibility (Adopted 4/10/
01)
Rule 33.5: Part 70 Permits--Time frames for Applications, Review and
Issuance (Adopted 10/12/93)
Rule 33.6: Part 70 Permits--Permit Term and Permit Reissuance
(Adopted 10/12/93)
Rule 33.7: Part 70 Permits--Notification (Adopted 4/10/01)
Rule 33.8: Part 70 Permits--Reopening of Permits (Adopted 10/12/93)
Rule 33.9: Part 70 Permits--Compliance Provisions (Adopted 4/10/01)
Rule 33.10: Part 70 Permits--General Part 70 Permits (Adopted 10/12/
93)
Rule 34: Acid Deposition Control (Adopted 3/14/95)
Rule 35: Elective Emission Limits (Adopted 11/12/96)
Rule 36: New Source Review--Hazardous Air Pollutants (Adopted 10/6/
98)
Rule 42: Permit Fees (Adopted 4/12/05)
Rule 44: Exemption Evaluation Fee (Adopted 9/10/96)
Rule 45: Plan Fees (Adopted 6/19/90)
Rule 45.2: Asbestos Removal Fees (Adopted 8/4/92)
Rule 47: Source Test, Emission Monitor, and Call-Back Fees (Adopted
6/22/99)
Rule 50: Opacity (Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 52: Particulate Matter-Concentration (Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 53: Particulate Matter-Process Weight (Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 54: Sulfur Compounds (Adopted 6/14/94)
Rule 56: Open Burning (Revised 11/11/03)
Rule 57: Incinerators (Adopted 1/11/05)
Rule 57.1: Particulate Matter Emissions From Fuel Burning Equipment
(Adopted 1/11/05)
Rule 62.7: Asbestos--Demolition and Renovation (Adopted 6/16/92)
Rule 63: Separation and Combination of Emissions (Adopted 11/21/78)
Rule 64: Sulfur Content of Fuels (Adopted 4/13/99)
Rule 67: Vacuum Producing Devices (Adopted 7/5/83)
Rule 68: Carbon Monoxide (Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 71: Crude Oil and Reactive Organic Compound Liquids (Adopted
12/13/94)
Rule 71.1: Crude Oil Production and Separation (Adopted 6/16/92)
Rule 71.2: Storage of Reactive Organic Compound Liquids (Adopted 9/
26/89)
Rule 71.3: Transfer of Reactive Organic Compound Liquids (Adopted 6/
16/92)
Rule 71.4: Petroleum Sumps, Pits, Ponds, and Well Cellars (Adopted
6/8/93)
Rule 71.5: Glycol Dehydrators (Adopted 12/13/94)
Rule 72: New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) (Adopted 9/13/05)
Rule 73: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAPS) (Adopted 9/13/05)
Rule 74: Specific Source Standards (Adopted 7/6/76)
Rule 74.1: Abrasive Blasting (Adopted 11/12/91)
Rule 74.2: Architectural Coatings (Adopted 11/13/01)
Rule 74.6: Surface Cleaning and Degreasing (Revised 11/11/03--
effective 7/1/04)
Rule 74.6.1: Batch Loaded Vapor Degreasers (Adopted 11/11/03--
effective 7/1/04)
Rule 74.7: Fugitive Emissions of Reactive Organic Compounds at
Petroleum Refineries and Chemical Plants (Adopted 10/10/95)
Rule 74.8: Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, Waste-water Separators
and Process Turnarounds (Adopted 7/5/83)
Rule 74.9: Stationary Internal Combustion Engines (Adopted 11/8/05)
Rule 74.10: Components at Crude Oil Production Facilities and
Natural Gas Production and Processing Facilities (Adopted 3/10/98)
Rule 74.11: Natural Gas-Fired Residential Water Heaters--Control of
NOX (Adopted 4/9/85)
Rule 74.11.1: Large Water Heaters and Small Boilers (Adopted 9/14/
99)
Rule 74.12: Surface Coating of Metal Parts and Products (Adopted 11/
11/03)
Rule 74.15: Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters (Adopted
11/8/94)
Rule 74.15.1: Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters (Adopted
6/13/00)
Rule 74.16: Oil Field Drilling Operations (Adopted 1/8/91)
Rule 74.20: Adhesives and Sealants (Adopted 1/11/05)
Rule 74.23: Stationary Gas Turbines (Adopted 1/08/02)
Rule 74.24: Marine Coating Operations (Revised 11/11/03)
Rule 74.24.1: Pleasure Craft Coating and Commercial Boatyard
Operations (Adopted 1/08/02)
Rule 74.26: Crude Oil Storage Tank Degassing Operations (Adopted 11/
8/94)
Rule 74.27: Gasoline and ROC Liquid Storage Tank Degassing
Operations (Adopted 11/8/94)
Rule 74.28: Asphalt Roofing Operations (Adopted 5/10/94)
Rule 74.30: Wood Products Coatings (Revised 11/11/03)
Rule 75: Circumvention (Adopted 11/27/78)
Rule 101: Sampling and Testing Facilities (Adopted 5/23/72)
Rule 102: Source Tests (Adopted 4/13/04)
Rule 103: Continuous Monitoring Systems (Adopted 2/9/99)
Rule 154: Stage 1 Episode Actions (Adopted 9/17/91)
Rule 155: Stage 2 Episode Actions (Adopted 9/17/91)
Rule 156: Stage 3 Episode Actions (Adopted 9/17/91)
Rule 158: Source Abatement Plans (Adopted 9/17/91)
Rule 159: Traffic Abatement Procedures (Adopted 9/17/91)
Rule 220: General Conformity (Adopted 5/9/95)
Rule 230: Notice to Comply (Adopted 11/9/99)
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E6-4204 Filed 3-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P