Nebkota Railway, Inc.-Abandonment Exemption-In Sheridan and Cherry Counties, NE, 14780-14782 [E6-4201]

Agencies

• Surface Transportation Board
• DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 2006)]
[NOT]
[Pages 14780-14782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-4201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Docket No. Ab-988X]


Nebkota Railway, Inc.--Abandonment Exemption--In Sheridan and 
Cherry Counties, NE

    By petition filed on December 1, 2005, Nebkota Railway, Inc. (NRI) 
seeks an exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502 from the prior approval 
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10903 to abandon a 43-mile portion of its 
line of railroad extending from milepost 374 at Rushville 69360 to the 
end of the line at milepost 331 at Merriman 69218 in Sheridan and 
Cherry Counties, NE. Notice of the filing was served and published in 
the Federal Register on December 21, 2005 (70 FR 75860). The Nebraska 
Game and Parks Commission (NGPC) filed a request for issuance of a 
notice of interim trail use (NITU). Rails to Trails Conservancy (RTC) 
and NGPC jointly filed a reply to NRI's petition and a request for 
imposition of a public use condition. NRI responded. We will grant the 
petition for exemption, subject to public use, trail use, 
environmental, and standard employee protective conditions.

Background

    The line proposed for abandonment is part of a 73.5-mile rail line 
acquired by NRI from the Chicago and North Western Transportation 
Company (CNW) in Nebkota Railway, Inc.--Acquisition and Operation 
Exemption--Line of Chicago and North Western Transportation Company, 
Finance Docket No. 32442 (ICC served Feb. 4, 1994). The 73.5-mile line 
extends from Merriman to Chadron, NE. In that proceeding, NRI also 
acquired incidental trackage rights over 27.8 miles of CNW's rail line 
extending from Chadron to Crawford, NE, to allow NRI to interchange 
with the Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BN). The line is a part 
of what had been CNW's Cowboy Line, which was mostly abandoned by CNW 
pursuant to authority granted in Chicago and North Western 
Transportation Company--Abandonment Exemption--Between Norfolk and 
Merriman, NE, Docket No. AB-1 (Sub-No. 249X) (ICC served June 2, 1994).
    There are three shippers on the portion of the line proposed for 
abandonment, Farmers Co-op Elevator Company of Gordon, Retzlaff Grain 
Co., Inc., and West Plains Grain, Inc. According to NRI, the traffic on 
that portion, which constitutes the eastern end of its line, has 
declined dramatically over the past few years and has proven to be a 
drain on the remainder of its operations. NRI's traffic data show that 
the number of revenue carloads being transported has dropped from 346 
in the year 2002 to 108 in the year 2004. NRI states that, in the 3-
year period, it has sustained an operating loss of $24,309.80. No 
overhead traffic moves over the line and NRI does not anticipate any 
increase in local traffic within the foreseeable future. NRI states 
that, if the 43-mile portion is authorized for abandonment, the tracks, 
ties, and other track materials will be salvaged and sold to help NRI 
retain and profitably operate the remainder of its railroad system, 
extending between Chadron and Rushville, with incidental trackage 
rights between Chadron and Crawford. NRI states that it has notified 
the three shippers on the line of the abandonment proposal and that 
they do not oppose the abandonment.
    In a joint reply filed on January 10, 2006, RTC and NGPC have 
expressed concern regarding the disposition of the right-of-way (ROW) 
should the Board authorize the abandonment. They contend that NRI, CNW, 
and RTC entered into a master agreement to settle a prolonged dispute 
between CNW and the State of Nebraska regarding abandonment of the 
Cowboy Line. RTC and NGPC point out that the master agreement, among 
other things, requires NRI to consent to rail bank its line under 
section 8(d) of the National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. 1247(d) 
(Trails Act), and convey the ROW to RTC or its assignee should NRI seek 
to abandon all or a portion of its line. Because NRI has disputed its 
obligations under the master agreement, RTC and NGPC request that the 
Board impose a public use condition in the instant proceeding and 
retain jurisdiction over the line by various other means until the 
contractual dispute with NRI is resolved.
    In a letter dated January 26, 2006, NRI has responded that, without 
accepting the arguments advanced in support of the request for the 
public use condition, NRI agrees upon the Board's approval of its 
abandonment petition to convey the ROW to NGPC to be used as a 
recreational trail pursuant to the Trails Act. NRI believes that this 
action would obviate the need for imposition of a public use condition.
    On February 17, 2006, RTC and NGPC jointly filed a status report on 
their negotiations, to which NRI responded by letter dated February 24, 
2006. RTC and NGPC jointly filed a further reply on February 28, 2006, 
and NRI responded by letter dated March 1, 2006.

[[Page 14781]]

    Subsequently, by facsimile filed on March 1, 2006, RTC and NGPC 
have informed the Board that they have resolved their dispute with NRI. 
Consequently, they withdraw their objections and requests for relief 
regarding retention of jurisdiction by the Board in this proceeding.

Discussion and Conclusions

    Under 49 U.S.C. 10903, a rail line may not be abandoned without our 
prior approval. Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, however, we must exempt a 
transaction or service from regulation when we find that: (1) Continued 
regulation is not necessary to carry out the rail transportation policy 
of 49 U.S.C. 10101; and (2) either (a) the transaction or service is of 
limited scope, or (b) regulation is not necessary to protect shippers 
from the abuse of market power.
    Detailed scrutiny under 49 U.S.C. 10903 is not necessary to carry 
out the rail transportation policy. By minimizing the administrative 
expense of the application process, an exemption will reduce regulatory 
barriers to exit [49 U.S.C. 10101(7)]. An exemption also will foster 
sound economic conditions and encourage efficient management by 
relieving NRI from the expense of maintaining and operating a line that 
continues to operate at a loss and by allowing NRI to apply its assets 
more productively elsewhere on its rail system [49 U.S.C. 10101(5) and 
(9)]. Other aspects of the rail transportation policy will not be 
adversely affected.
    Regulation of the proposed transaction is not necessary to protect 
shippers from the abuse of market power. NRI has informed the three 
shippers on the line of its abandonment proposal, and they have not 
objected. Nevertheless, to ensure that the shippers are informed of our 
action, we will require NRI to serve a copy of this decision and notice 
on Farmers Co-op Elevator Company of Gordon, Retzlaff Grain Co., Inc., 
and West Plains Grain, Inc., within 5 days of the service date of this 
decision and notice and to certify to the Board that it has done so. 
Given our market power finding, we need not determine whether the 
proposed abandonment is limited in scope.
    Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), we may not use our exemption authority to 
relieve a carrier of its statutory obligation to protect the interests 
of its employees. Accordingly, as a condition to granting this 
exemption, we will impose the employee protective conditions set forth 
in Oregon Short Line R. Co.--Abandonment--Goshen, 360 I.C.C. 91 (1979).
    NRI has submitted an environmental and historic report with its 
petition and has notified the appropriate Federal, state, and local 
agencies of the opportunity to submit information concerning the energy 
and environmental impacts of the proposed abandonment. See 49 CFR 
1105.11. Our Section of Environmental Analysis (SEA) has examined the 
environmental report, verified the data it contains, and analyzed the 
probable effects of the proposed action on the quality of the human 
environment.
    SEA served an environmental assessment (EA) on January 31, 2006, 
requesting comments by March 2, 2006. In the EA, SEA discussed concerns 
expressed by, or reviews not yet completed by, various agencies. Based 
on the record at that time, SEA recommended that five conditions be 
imposed on any decision granting abandonment authority.
    In the EA, SEA noted that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
Mountain-Prairie Region (FWS), had not yet completed its review of the 
proposed abandonment. Therefore, SEA recommended that, prior to the 
onset of salvage operations, NRI be required to consult with the FWS 
and report the result of these consultations to SEA.
    SEA also stated that the U.S. National Park Service, Midwest 
Regional Office (NPS), had not yet completed its review. Therefore, SEA 
recommended that, prior to the onset of salvage operations, NRI be 
required to consult with NPS and report the result of these 
consultations to SEA.
    At the time the EA was prepared, the U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region 7 (USEPA), had not provided comments regarding potential 
permitting requirements of the proposed abandonment under section 402 
of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, SEA recommended that NRI be required 
to consult with USEPA and report the result of these consultations to 
SEA prior to the onset of salvage operations.
    SEA indicated in the EA that the U.S. Department of Commerce, 
National Geodetic Survey (NGS), had not completed its review. 
Therefore, SEA recommended that, prior to the onset of salvage 
operations, NRI be required to consult with NGS and report the result 
of these consultations to SEA.
    Finally, SEA stated in the EA that the Supervisors of Cherry and 
Sheridan Counties had not yet completed their review of the proposed 
abandonment. Therefore, SEA recommended that, prior to the onset of 
salvage operations, NRI be required to consult with the Supervisors of 
those counties and report the result of these consultations to SEA.
    Comments in response to the EA were received and considered by SEA. 
In particular, SEA received input from FWS, NPS, and USEPA stating that 
they had no comment on the abandonment as proposed. SEA also received 
comments from the Supervisors of Cherry and Sheridan Counties stating 
that they had no objection to the abandonment as proposed. Based on 
these comments, SEA has modified its recommendations. Because most of 
the concerns raised in the EA have been satisfied, SEA now recommends 
only the imposition of a condition requiring NRI to consult with NGS 
and report the result of these consultations to SEA prior to the onset 
of salvage operations. Accordingly, we will impose the environmental 
condition recommended by SEA. Based on SEA's recommendation, we 
conclude that the proposed abandonment, if implemented as conditioned, 
will not significantly affect either the quality of the human 
environment or the conservation of energy resources.
    On January 4, 2006, NGPC filed a request for issuance of a NITU for 
the 43-mile line under the Trails Act. NGPC has submitted a statement 
of willingness to assume financial responsibility for the ROW and has 
acknowledged that use of the ROW is subject to possible future 
reconstruction and reactivation of the ROW for rail service, as 
required under 49 CFR 1152.29. By letter filed on January 26, 2006, NRI 
states that it is willing to convey the ROW for use as a trail under 
the Trails Act. Because NGPC's request complies with the requirements 
of 49 CFR 1152.29 and NRI is willing to enter into negotiations, we 
will issue a NITU for the subject line. The parties may negotiate an 
agreement during the 180-day period prescribed below. If an agreement 
is executed, no further Board action is necessary. If no agreement is 
reached within 180 days, NRI may fully abandon the line, subject to the 
conditions imposed below. See 49 CFR 1152.29(d)(1). Use of the right-
of-way for trail purposes is subject to restoration for railroad 
purposes.
    SEA has indicated in its EA that, following abandonment and salvage 
of the line, the ROW may be suitable for other public use. RTC and NGPC 
have requested imposition of a 180-day public use condition to ensure 
preservation of the ROW and to provide sufficient time to negotiate for 
the acquisition of the ROW for use of as a trail. RTC and NGPC also 
request that NRI be prohibited from disposing of any interest in real 
estate, bridges, culverts, roadbed and any potential trail-related 
structures other than to RTC or NGPC

[[Page 14782]]

for a 180-day period from the effective date of the abandonment.
    Persons who request a Trails Act condition may also request a 
public use condition under 49 U.S.C. 10905. See Rail Abandonments--Use 
of Rights-of-Way as Trails, 2 I.C.C.2d 591, 609 (1986) (Trails). When 
both conditions are appropriate, it is our policy to impose them 
concurrently, subject to the execution of a trail use agreement. RTC 
and NGPC have met the public use criteria prescribed at 49 CFR 
1152.28(a)(2) by specifying: (1) The condition sought; (2) the public 
importance of the condition; (3) the period of time for which the 
condition would be effective; and (4) justification for the period of 
time requested. Accordingly, a 180-day public use condition, commencing 
from the effective date of this decision and notice, will be imposed on 
the line to be abandoned to enable any state or local government agency 
or other interested person to negotiate the acquisition of the line for 
public use.
    If a trail use agreement is reached on a portion of the ROW, NRI 
must keep the remaining ROW intact for the remainder of the 180-day 
period to permit public use negotiations. Also, we note that a public 
use condition is not imposed for the benefit of any one potential 
purchaser. Rather, it provides an opportunity for any interested person 
to negotiate to acquire the ROW that has been found suitable for public 
purposes, including trail use. Therefore, with respect to the public 
use condition, NRI is not required to deal exclusively with RTC and 
NGPC, but may engage in negotiations with other interested persons.
    The parties should note that operation of the trail use and public 
use procedures could be delayed, or even foreclosed, by the financial 
assistance process under 49 U.S.C. 10904. As stated in Trails, 2 
I.C.C.2d at 608, offers of financial assistance (OFA) to acquire rail 
lines for continued rail service or to subsidize rail operations take 
priority over interim trail use/rail banking and public use. 
Accordingly, if an OFA is timely filed under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(1), the 
effective date of this decision and notice will be postponed beyond the 
effective date indicated here. See 49 CFR 1152.27(e)(2). In addition, 
the effective date may be further postponed at later stages in the OFA 
process. See 49 CFR 1152.27(f). Finally, if the line is sold under the 
OFA procedures, the petition for abandonment exemption will be 
dismissed and trail use and public use precluded. Alternatively, if a 
sale under the OFA procedures does not occur, the trail use and public 
use processes may proceed.
    It is ordered:
    1. Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, we exempt from the prior approval 
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10903 the abandonment by NRI of the above-
described line, subject to the employee protective conditions set forth 
in Oregon Short Line R. Co.--Abandonment--Goshen, 360 I.C.C. 91 (1979), 
and subject to the conditions that NRI (1) comply with the terms and 
conditions for implementing interim trail use/rail banking and 
permitting public use negotiations as set forth below, for a period of 
180 days commencing from the April 22, 2006, effective date of this 
decision and notice (until October 19, 2006), and (2) consult with NGS 
and report the result of these consultations to SEA prior to the onset 
of salvage operations.
    2. NRI is directed to serve a copy of this decision and notice on 
Farmers Co-op Elevator Company of Gordon, Retzlaff Grain Co., Inc., and 
West Plains Grain, Inc., within 5 days after the service date of this 
decision and notice and to certify to the Board that it has done so.
    3. Consistent with the public use and interim trail use/rail 
banking conditions imposed in this decision and notice, NRI may 
discontinue service and salvage track and related materials. NRI shall 
keep intact the ROW, including bridges, culverts, roadbed and any 
potential trail-related structures, for a period of 180 days from the 
effective date of this decision and notice to enable any state or local 
government agency, or other interested person, to negotiate the 
acquisition of the line for public use. If an interim trail use/rail 
banking agreement is executed before October 19, 2006, the public use 
condition will expire to the extent the trail use/rail banking 
agreement covers the same line.
    4. If an interim trail use/rail banking agreement is reached, it 
must require the trail user to assume, for the term of the agreement, 
full responsibility for management of, any legal liability arising out 
of the transfer or use of (unless the user is immune from liability, in 
which case it need only indemnify the railroad against any potential 
liability), and for the payment of any and all taxes that may be levied 
or assessed against, the ROW.
    5. Interim trail use/rail banking is subject to the future 
restoration of rail service and to the user's continuing to meet the 
financial obligations for the ROW.
    6. If interim trail use is implemented, and subsequently the user 
intends to terminate trail use, it must send the Board a copy of this 
decision and notice and request that it be vacated on a specified date.
    7. If an agreement for interim trail use/rail banking is reached by 
October 19, 2006, interim trail use may be implemented. If no agreement 
is reached by that time, NRI may fully abandon the line provided the 
other conditions imposed in this proceeding are met.
    8. An OFA under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(1) to allow rail service to 
continue must be received by the railroad and the Board by March 31, 
2006, subject to time extensions authorized under 49 CFR 
1152.27(c)(1)(i)(C). The offeror must comply with 49 U.S.C. 10904 and 
49 CFR 1152.27(c)(1). Each OFA must be accompanied by the filing fee, 
which currently is set at $1,200. See 49 CFR 1002.2(f)(25).
    9. OFAs and related correspondence to the Board must refer to this 
proceeding. The following notation must be typed in bold face on the 
lower left-hand corner of the envelope: ``Office of Proceedings, AB-
OFA.''
    10. Provided no OFA has been received, this exemption will be 
effective on April 22, 2006. Petitions to stay must be filed by April 
7, 2006, and petitions to reopen must be filed by April 17, 2006.
    11. Pursuant to the provisions of 49 CFR 1152.29(e)(2), NRI shall 
file a notice of consummation with the Board to signify that it has 
exercised the authority granted and fully abandoned the line. If 
consummation has not been effected by NRI's filing of a notice of 
consummation by March 21, 2007, and there are no legal or regulatory 
barriers to consummation, the authority to abandon will automatically 
expire. If a legal or regulatory barrier to consummation exists at the 
end of the 1-year period, the notice of consummation must be filed no 
later than 60 days after satisfaction, expiration, or removal of the 
legal or regulatory barrier.

    Decided: March 17, 2006.

    By the Board, Chairman Buttrey and Vice Chairman Mulvey.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-4201 Filed 3-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P