Pipeline Safety: Request for Waiver; Alliance Pipeline L.P., 14572-14573 [06-2830]
Download as PDF
14572
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 22, 2006 / Notices
[FR Doc. 06–2745 Filed 3–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4909–60–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Office of Hazardous Materials Safety;
Notice of Application for Special
Permits
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: List of Applications for Special
Permits.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special
permits from the Department of
Transportation’s Hazardous Materials
SUMMARY:
Regulations (49 CFR Part 107, Subpart
B), notice is hereby given that the Office
of Hazardous Materials Safety has
received the application described
herein. Each mode of transportation for
which a particular special permit is
requested is indicated by a number in
the ‘‘Nature of Application’’ portion of
the table below as follows: 1—Motor
vehicle, 2—Rail freight, 3—Cargo vessel,
4—Cargo aircraft only, 5—Passengercarrying aircraft.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Address Comments to:
Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, U.S.
Department of Transportation,
Washington, DC 20590.
Comments should refer to the
application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If Confirmation of receipt of
comments is desired, include a selfaddressed stamped postcard showing
the special permit number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the applications are available
for inspection in the Records Center,
Nassif Building, 400 7th Street SW.,
Washington, DC or at https://
dms.dot.gov.
This notice of receipt of applications
for special permit is published in
accordance with Part 107 of the Federal
hazardous materials transportation law
(49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 16,
2006.
R. Ryan Posten,
Chief, Special Permits Program, Office of
Hazardous Materials, Special Permits &
Approvals.
NEW SPECIAL PERMITS
Application
No.
Docket
No.
14323–N .......
................
14325–N .......
14326–N .......
Applicant
Regulation(s) affected
Nature of special permits thereof
Puritan Products, Bethlehem, PA.
49 CFR 173.158 .................
................
DF Young, Inc., Jamaica,
NY.
49 CFR 49 CFR Table
§ 172.101, Column (9B).
................
West Isle Line, Alpaugh,
CA.
49 CFR 174.85 ...................
To authorize the transportation in commerce of nitric
acid, other than red fuming in UN6HA1 composite
drums by highway. (Mode 1)
To authorize the transportation in commerce of certain
Division 1.1 and 1.2 rockets which exceed quantities
authorized for transportation by cargo aircraft only.
(Mode 4)
To authorize the transportation in commerce of rail cars
without the use of buffer cars on a class 2 restricted
speed track during daylight hours. (Mode 2)
[FR Doc. 06–2746 Filed 3–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4909–60–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2006–23387; Notice 1]
Pipeline Safety: Request for Waiver;
Alliance Pipeline L.P.
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA); DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent to consider
waiver request.
AGENCY:
Alliance Pipeline L.P. (APL)
requested a waiver of compliance for the
U.S. portion of its pipeline system in
Class 1 and Class 2 locations to operate
its pipeline at stress levels up to 80
percent of the pipeline’s specified
minimum yield strength (SMYS), and
increase the design factor for its
compressor station piping. APL also
requested relief from the hydrostatic
testing requirements for its compressor
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:47 Mar 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
station piping and pressure relieving
and limiting station equipment
requirements.
DATES: Persons interested in submitting
comments regarding this waiver request
must do so by April 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments should reference
Docket No. PHMSA–2006–23387 and
may be submitted in the following ways:
• DOT Web site: https://dms.dot.gov.
To submit comments on the DOT
electronic docket site, click ‘‘Comment/
Submissions,’’ click ‘‘Continue,’’ fill in
the requested information, click
‘‘Continue,’’ enter your comment, then
click ‘‘Submit.’’
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management System:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: DOT Docket
Management System; Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• E-Gov Web site: https://
www.Regulations.gov. This site allows
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the public to enter comments on any
Federal Register notice issued by any
agency.
Instructions: You should identify the
docket number, PHMSA–2006–23387, at
the beginning of your comments. If you
submit your comments by mail, you
should submit two copies. If you wish
to receive confirmation that PHMSA
received your comments, you should
include a self-addressed stamped
postcard. Internet users may submit
comments at https://
www.regulations.gov, and may access all
comments received by DOT at https://
dms.dot.gov by performing a simple
search for the docket number.
Note: All comments will be posted without
changes or edits to https://dms.dot.gov
including any personal information
provided.
Privacy Act Statement: Anyone may
search the electronic form of all
comments received for any of our
dockets. You may review DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477) or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 22, 2006 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Reynolds by telephone at 202–
366–2786; by fax at 202–366–4566; by
mail at DOT, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), Pipeline Safety Program
(PHP), 400 7th Street, SW., Room 2103,
Washington, DC 20590, or by e-mail at
james.reynolds@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Background
Alliance Pipeline L.P. requests a
waiver from the pipeline regulations to
operate the U.S. portion of its pipeline
in Class 1 and Class 2 locations—
upstream of the Aux Sable Delivery
Meter Station (mile post 0.0) to its
interconnection with the Canadian
portion of the APL system at the
Canadian/United States border near
Minot, North Dakota (mile post 874)—
at stress levels up to 80 percent of the
pipeline’s SMYS. APL is also requesting
a waiver to increase the design factor for
its compressor station piping as well as
relief from the hydrostatic testing
requirements for its compressor station
piping. Specifically, APL requests a
waiver of compliance from the
following regulatory requirements:
• 49 CFR 192.111—Design factor (F)
for steel pipe;
• 49 CFR 192.201—Required capacity
of pressure relieving and limiting
stations;
• 49 CFR 192.505—Strength test
requirements for steel pipelines to
operate at a hoop stress of 30 percent or
more of SMYS; and
• 49 CFR 192.619—Maximum
allowable operating pressure: Steel or
plastic pipelines.
The U.S. portion of APL’s pipeline
system transports natural gas from the
Canadian/United States border near
Minot, North Dakota to the Aux Sable
Delivery Meter Station near Chicago,
Illinois. The U.S. pipeline system was
commissioned in 2000 and is comprised
of 888-miles of 36-inch diameter X70
pipes, with varying wall thicknesses,
and 7 compressor stations. The pipeline
was constructed using fusion bonded
epoxy (FBE) coating, heavy-wall pipe,
and was mechanically welded. The
pipeline was in-line inspected using a
high resolution magnetic flux leakage
tool, and all girth welds were inspected.
Pipeline System Analysis
APL conducted evaluations of the
U.S. portion of its pipeline to confirm
whether the system could safely and
reliably operate at increased stress
levels. As part of its evaluation, APL
established a feasibility criterion to
assess the safety and reliability of the
pipeline to operate at stress levels up to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:47 Mar 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
80 percent of the pipeline’s SMYS. The
feasibility criterion includes, but is not
limited to:
• Developing operational
commitments that would improve safety
for any person residing, working, or
recreating near the U.S. portion of its
pipeline, including approximately 15
miles of pipeline located in high
consequence areas.
• Conducting in-depth assessments of
its existing pipeline equipment to
ensure the equipment is capable of
sustaining operations at increased
pressures. In addition, APL plans to
modify its existing pipeline to enhance
the safety and reliability of the pipeline
to operate at stress levels up to 80
percent of the pipe’s SMYS.
APL also performed technical reviews
of its pipeline and compared the threats
imposed on a pipeline operating at 72
percent SMYS to those imposed on a
pipeline operating at 80 percent SMYS.
The following nine threats were
analyzed: (1) Excavation damage; (2)
external corrosion; (3) internal
corrosion; (4) stress corrosion cracking;
(5) pipe manufacturing; (6) construction;
(7) equipment; (8) weather/outside
factors; and (9) incorrect operation.
To combat increased threats to its
pipeline, APL implemented preventive
measures as part of its Integrity
Management Program (IMP) to mitigate
the threat imposed by excavation
damage. APL also developed an
External Corrosion Mitigation Plan to
address the threat of external corrosion,
and APL will rely on the integrity
reassessment intervals of IMP to
mitigate the threat of internal corrosion.
To manage the threat of stress corrosion
cracking, APL will implement magnetic
particle examinations at any location(s)
along its pipeline where damage to its
FBE coating is detected. Based on APL’s
technical review of its pipeline, and its
actions to prevent and mitigate potential
threats to the pipeline, APL believes
that its pipeline can be safely and
reliably operated at stress levels up to
80 percent of the pipeline’s SMYS, with
no increased threats to the pipeline.
APL also requests relief from
regulations which require that
compressor station piping be subjected
to Class 3 testing requirements, and
seeks to increase the design factor from
50 percent SMYS to 54 percent SMYS.
Additionally APL asks to be allowed to
use ASME B31.8 requirements to test
compressor stating piping to 1.4 times
the maximum allowable operating
pressure (MAOP) in lieu of § 192.505
requirements that require compressor
station piping be tested to 1.5 times the
pipe’s MAOP.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14573
APL noted that since ASME B31.8,
which served as the early standard for
the design, construction, and operation
of natural gas transmission pipelines,
PHMSA has improved its pipeline
safety regulations to include an integrity
management program and a focus on
high consequence areas. APL also
embraces PHMSA’s commitment to
improving pipeline safety, and believes
its proposal will achieve a greater
degree of safety than that currently
provided by the regulations.
PHMSA will consider APL’s waiver
request and whether its proposal will
yield an equivalent or greater degree of
safety than that provided by the current
regulations. After considering any
comments received, PHMSA may grant
APL’s waiver request as proposed, with
modifications and conditions, or deny
APL’s request. If the waiver is granted
and PHMSA subsequently determines
the effect of the waiver is inconsistent
with pipeline safety, PHMSA may
revoke the waiver at its sole discretion.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60118(c) and 49 CFR
1.53.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 20,
2006.
Joy Kadnar,
Director of Engineering and Emergency
Support.
[FR Doc. 06–2830 Filed 3–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2006–23998; Notice 1]
Pipeline Safety: Request for Waiver;
Rockies Express Pipeline
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA); DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent to consider
waiver request.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Rockies Express Pipeline
LLC (Rockies Express) has requested a
waiver of compliance from the pipeline
safety regulation that prescribes the
design factor to be used in the design
formula for steel pipe. The waiver will
allow Rockies Express to operate at
hoop stresses up to 80 percent specified
minimum yield strength (SMYS) in
Class 1 locations.
DATES: Persons interested in submitting
comments regarding this waiver request
must do so by April 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments should reference
Docket No. PHMSA–2006–23998 and
may be submitted in the following ways:
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14572-14573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-2830]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA-2006-23387; Notice 1]
Pipeline Safety: Request for Waiver; Alliance Pipeline L.P.
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA);
DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent to consider waiver request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Alliance Pipeline L.P. (APL) requested a waiver of compliance
for the U.S. portion of its pipeline system in Class 1 and Class 2
locations to operate its pipeline at stress levels up to 80 percent of
the pipeline's specified minimum yield strength (SMYS), and increase
the design factor for its compressor station piping. APL also requested
relief from the hydrostatic testing requirements for its compressor
station piping and pressure relieving and limiting station equipment
requirements.
DATES: Persons interested in submitting comments regarding this waiver
request must do so by April 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments should reference Docket No. PHMSA-2006-23387 and
may be submitted in the following ways:
DOT Web site: https://dms.dot.gov. To submit comments on
the DOT electronic docket site, click ``Comment/Submissions,'' click
``Continue,'' fill in the requested information, click ``Continue,''
enter your comment, then click ``Submit.''
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management System: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: DOT Docket Management System; Room PL-401
on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
E-Gov Web site: https://www.Regulations.gov. This site
allows the public to enter comments on any Federal Register notice
issued by any agency.
Instructions: You should identify the docket number, PHMSA-2006-
23387, at the beginning of your comments. If you submit your comments
by mail, you should submit two copies. If you wish to receive
confirmation that PHMSA received your comments, you should include a
self-addressed stamped postcard. Internet users may submit comments at
https://www.regulations.gov, and may access all comments received by DOT
at https://dms.dot.gov by performing a simple search for the docket
number.
Note: All comments will be posted without changes or edits to
https://dms.dot.gov including any personal information provided.
Privacy Act Statement: Anyone may search the electronic form of all
comments received for any of our dockets. You may review DOT's complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477) or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
[[Page 14573]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Reynolds by telephone at 202-
366-2786; by fax at 202-366-4566; by mail at DOT, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Pipeline Safety
Program (PHP), 400 7th Street, SW., Room 2103, Washington, DC 20590, or
by e-mail at james.reynolds@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Alliance Pipeline L.P. requests a waiver from the pipeline
regulations to operate the U.S. portion of its pipeline in Class 1 and
Class 2 locations--upstream of the Aux Sable Delivery Meter Station
(mile post 0.0) to its interconnection with the Canadian portion of the
APL system at the Canadian/United States border near Minot, North
Dakota (mile post 874)--at stress levels up to 80 percent of the
pipeline's SMYS. APL is also requesting a waiver to increase the design
factor for its compressor station piping as well as relief from the
hydrostatic testing requirements for its compressor station piping.
Specifically, APL requests a waiver of compliance from the following
regulatory requirements:
49 CFR 192.111--Design factor (F) for steel pipe;
49 CFR 192.201--Required capacity of pressure relieving
and limiting stations;
49 CFR 192.505--Strength test requirements for steel
pipelines to operate at a hoop stress of 30 percent or more of SMYS;
and
49 CFR 192.619--Maximum allowable operating pressure:
Steel or plastic pipelines.
The U.S. portion of APL's pipeline system transports natural gas
from the Canadian/United States border near Minot, North Dakota to the
Aux Sable Delivery Meter Station near Chicago, Illinois. The U.S.
pipeline system was commissioned in 2000 and is comprised of 888-miles
of 36-inch diameter X70 pipes, with varying wall thicknesses, and 7
compressor stations. The pipeline was constructed using fusion bonded
epoxy (FBE) coating, heavy-wall pipe, and was mechanically welded. The
pipeline was in-line inspected using a high resolution magnetic flux
leakage tool, and all girth welds were inspected.
Pipeline System Analysis
APL conducted evaluations of the U.S. portion of its pipeline to
confirm whether the system could safely and reliably operate at
increased stress levels. As part of its evaluation, APL established a
feasibility criterion to assess the safety and reliability of the
pipeline to operate at stress levels up to 80 percent of the pipeline's
SMYS. The feasibility criterion includes, but is not limited to:
Developing operational commitments that would improve
safety for any person residing, working, or recreating near the U.S.
portion of its pipeline, including approximately 15 miles of pipeline
located in high consequence areas.
Conducting in-depth assessments of its existing pipeline
equipment to ensure the equipment is capable of sustaining operations
at increased pressures. In addition, APL plans to modify its existing
pipeline to enhance the safety and reliability of the pipeline to
operate at stress levels up to 80 percent of the pipe's SMYS.
APL also performed technical reviews of its pipeline and compared
the threats imposed on a pipeline operating at 72 percent SMYS to those
imposed on a pipeline operating at 80 percent SMYS. The following nine
threats were analyzed: (1) Excavation damage; (2) external corrosion;
(3) internal corrosion; (4) stress corrosion cracking; (5) pipe
manufacturing; (6) construction; (7) equipment; (8) weather/outside
factors; and (9) incorrect operation.
To combat increased threats to its pipeline, APL implemented
preventive measures as part of its Integrity Management Program (IMP)
to mitigate the threat imposed by excavation damage. APL also developed
an External Corrosion Mitigation Plan to address the threat of external
corrosion, and APL will rely on the integrity reassessment intervals of
IMP to mitigate the threat of internal corrosion. To manage the threat
of stress corrosion cracking, APL will implement magnetic particle
examinations at any location(s) along its pipeline where damage to its
FBE coating is detected. Based on APL's technical review of its
pipeline, and its actions to prevent and mitigate potential threats to
the pipeline, APL believes that its pipeline can be safely and reliably
operated at stress levels up to 80 percent of the pipeline's SMYS, with
no increased threats to the pipeline.
APL also requests relief from regulations which require that
compressor station piping be subjected to Class 3 testing requirements,
and seeks to increase the design factor from 50 percent SMYS to 54
percent SMYS. Additionally APL asks to be allowed to use ASME B31.8
requirements to test compressor stating piping to 1.4 times the maximum
allowable operating pressure (MAOP) in lieu of Sec. 192.505
requirements that require compressor station piping be tested to 1.5
times the pipe's MAOP.
APL noted that since ASME B31.8, which served as the early standard
for the design, construction, and operation of natural gas transmission
pipelines, PHMSA has improved its pipeline safety regulations to
include an integrity management program and a focus on high consequence
areas. APL also embraces PHMSA's commitment to improving pipeline
safety, and believes its proposal will achieve a greater degree of
safety than that currently provided by the regulations.
PHMSA will consider APL's waiver request and whether its proposal
will yield an equivalent or greater degree of safety than that provided
by the current regulations. After considering any comments received,
PHMSA may grant APL's waiver request as proposed, with modifications
and conditions, or deny APL's request. If the waiver is granted and
PHMSA subsequently determines the effect of the waiver is inconsistent
with pipeline safety, PHMSA may revoke the waiver at its sole
discretion.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60118(c) and 49 CFR 1.53.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 20, 2006.
Joy Kadnar,
Director of Engineering and Emergency Support.
[FR Doc. 06-2830 Filed 3-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P