Pipeline Safety: Request for Waiver; Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C., 14575-14576 [06-2829]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 22, 2006 / Notices
For the reasons stated, Rockies
Express is requesting a waiver from the
regulatory requirements at 49 CFR
192.111 for its Rockies Express Pipeline
Project, and is seeking to operate its new
interstate Rockies Express pipeline at
hoop stresses up to 80 percent SMYS in
Class 1 locations.
PHMSA will consider Rockies
Express’ waiver request and whether its
proposal will yield an equivalent or
greater degree of safety than that
currently provided by the regulations.
After considering any comments
received, PHMSA may grant Rockies
Express’ waiver request as proposed,
with modifications and conditions, or
deny the request. If the waiver is
granted and PHMSA subsequently
determines the effect of the waiver is
inconsistent with pipeline safety,
PHMSA reserves the right to revoke the
waiver at anytime.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60118(c) and 49 CFR
1.53.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 17,
2006.
Theodore L. Willke,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline
Safety.
[FR Doc. 06–2831 Filed 3–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2006–23448; Notice 1]
Pipeline Safety: Request for Waiver;
Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA); DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent to consider
waiver request.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Maritimes & Northeast
Pipeline, L.L.C. (M&N) requests a waiver
of compliance for the U.S. portion of its
pipeline system in Class 1, 2, and 3
locations to operate at stress levels up
to 80 percent; 67 percent; and 56
percent respectively, of the pipeline’s
specified minimum yield strength
(SMYS).
DATES: Persons interested in submitting
comments on the waiver request
described in this Notice must do so by
April 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments should reference
Docket No. PHMSA–2006–23448 and
may be submitted in the following ways:
• DOT Web site: https://dms.dot.gov.
To submit comments on the DOT
electronic docket site, click ‘‘Comment/
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:47 Mar 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
Submissions,’’ click ‘‘Continue,’’ fill in
the requested information, click
‘‘Continue,’’ enter your comment, then
click ‘‘Submit.’’
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management System:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: DOT Docket
Management System; Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• E-Gov Web Site: https://
www.Regulations.gov. This site allows
the public to enter comments on any
Federal Register notice issued by any
agency.
Instructions: You should identify the
docket number, PHMSA–2006–23448, at
the beginning of your comments. If you
submit your comments by mail, you
should submit two copies. If you wish
to receive confirmation that PHMSA
received your comments, you should
include a self-addressed stamped
postcard. Internet users may submit
comments at https://
www.regulations.gov, and may access all
comments received by DOT at https://
dms.dot.gov by performing a simple
search for the docket number.
Note: All comments will be posted without
changes or edits to https://dms.dot.gov
including any personal information
provided.
Privacy Act Statement: Anyone may
search the electronic form of all
comments received for any of our
dockets. You may review DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477) or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Reynolds by telephone at 202–
366–2786; by fax at 202–366–4566; by
mail at DOT, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), Pipeline Safety Program
(PHP), 400 7th Street, SW., Room 2103,
Washington, DC 20590; or by e-mail at
james.reynolds@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline,
L.L.C. requests a waiver of compliance
for the U.S. portion of its pipeline
system in Class 1, 2, and 3 locations to
operate at stress levels up to 80 percent;
67 percent; and 56 percent respectively,
of the pipeline’s SMYS. Specifically,
M&N requests a waiver of compliance
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14575
from the following regulatory
requirements:
• 49 CFR 192.111—Design factor (F)
for steel pipe;
• 49 CFR 192.201—Required capacity
of pressure relieving and limiting
stations;
• 49 CFR 192.503—General
Requirements;
• 49 CFR 192.611—Change in class
location: Confirmation or revision of
maximum allowable operating pressure;
and
• 49 CFR 192.619—Maximum
allowable operating pressure: Steel or
plastic pipelines.
The proposed waiver would apply to
approximately 203 miles of M&N’s 24inch diameter pipeline. This portion of
pipeline extends from M&N’s
Baileyville, Maine compressor station
near the U.S./Canada border to
Westbrook, Maine; and includes two
compressor stations. The current
maximum allowable operating pressure
(MAOP) of the mainline system is 1440
pounds per square inch gauge (psig).
M&N placed its pipeline in service on
December 1, 1999. The pipeline is
operated by M&N Operating Company,
LLC—a wholly owned subsidiary of
Duke Energy Gas Transmission. The
pipeline is 24-inch diameter, Grade X–
70 pipe with varying wall thicknesses.
One hundred percent of the pipeline’s
girth welds were inspected using
radiography, and the pipeline—
including girth welds—are coated with
fusion bonded epoxy. M&N tested the
Class 1 and 2 pipelines to 125 percent
MAOP; the Class 3 pipeline was tested
to 150 percent MAOP. In addition, M&N
performed an in-line inspection of its
pipeline in 2002 and no anomalies were
detected.
Pipeline System Analysis
M&N conducted evaluations of the
U.S. portion of its pipeline to confirm
whether the system could safely and
reliably operate at increased stress
levels. As part of its evaluation, M&N
analyzed and compared the threats
imposed on a pipeline operating at 72
percent SMYS to those imposed on a
pipeline operating at 80 percent SMYS;
including: (1) External corrosion; (2)
internal corrosion; (3) stress corrosion
cracking; (4) pipe manufacturing; (5)
construction; (6) equipment; (7)
immediate failure due to puncture; (8)
delayed failure due to resident defects
or damage; (9) incorrect operation; and
(10) weather/outside factors. M&N
asserts that any impact(s) that
potentially threaten the integrity of its
pipeline, as a consequence of the line
operating at higher stress levels, have
been addressed.
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
14576
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 22, 2006 / Notices
M&N requests a waiver of compliance
from the regulatory requirements at 49
CFR 192.111. This regulation prescribes
the design factor to be used in the
design formula in § 192.105. The design
factors are found in the following table:
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 20,
2006.
Joy Kadnar,
Director of Engineering and Emergency
Support.
[FR Doc. 06–2829 Filed 3–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
Class location
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
1
2
3
4
Design factor
(F)
............................................
............................................
............................................
............................................
0.72
0.60
0.50
0.40
M&N is proposing to use a design
factor for its existing pipeline of 80
percent SMYS for Class 1; 67 percent
SMYS for Class 2; and 56 percent SMYS
for Class 3. M&N notes that if the waiver
is granted, it intends to operate its
pipeline in the future with a design
factor of 80 percent SMYS for Class 1;
60 percent SMYS for Class 2; and 50
percent SMYS for Class 3.
M&N also requests a waiver from
§ 192.201(a)(2)(i) which states if the
MAOP is 60 psig or more, the pressure
may not exceed MAOP plus 10 percent,
or the pressure that produces a hoop
stress of 75 percent SMYS, which ever
is lower. M&N proposes to set the over
pressure protection for the waiver
sections to 104 percent of the pipeline
MAOP. This setting is based on the ratio
of 75 percent to 72 percent of SMYS.
M&N additionally requests a waiver
from the requirements of § 192.503(c)
which limits the maximum hoop stress
allowed to 80 percent of the pipeline’s
SYMS if air, natural gas, or inert gas is
used as the test medium. M&N desires
to test its compressor station piping to
82 percent SMYS.
Section 192.611 requires an operator
to confirm or revise the MAOP of its
pipeline if the hoop stress
corresponding to the established MAOP
is not commensurate with the present
class location. M&N notes that any class
location changes that occur subsequent
to this proposed waiver will be filed
under separate waiver requests.
PHMSA will consider M&N’s waiver
request and whether its proposal will
yield an equivalent or greater degree of
safety than that currently provided by
the regulations. After considering any
comments received, PHMSA may grant
M&N’s waiver request as proposed, with
modifications and conditions, or deny
M&N’s request. If the waiver is granted
and PHMSA subsequently determines
the effect of the waiver is inconsistent
with pipeline safety, PHMSA may
revoke the waiver at its sole discretion.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60118 (c) and 49 CFR
1.53.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:47 Mar 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34830]
Kansas City Transportation Company
LLC—Lease and Assignment of Lease
Exemption—Kansas City Terminal
Railway Company and Kaw River
Railroad, Inc.
Kansas City Transportation Company
LLC (KCTL), a noncarrier, has filed a
verified notice of exemption under 49
CFR 1150.31 to acquire by lease from
Kansas City Terminal Railway Company
(KCT) approximately 25.73 miles of rail
line in the Kansas City Terminal District
in Jackson County, MO, and Wyandotte
County, KS. KCTL also seeks to acquire
by assignment from Kaw River Railroad,
Inc. (KRR) the operating and lease rights
over all tracks owned by KCT which are
currently subleased to KRR and over all
tracks owned by The Kansas City
Southern Railway Company (KCS)
which are leased to KRR. KCTL, a
wholly owned subsidiary of KCT, states
that it expects to enter into one or more
agreements with contract operators, but
that it will retain the common carrier
obligation.1
The lines KCTL seeks to acquire by
lease are: all leads and tracks connecting
to the KCT Joint Track, including KCT
Main 1 west of Osage Ave. to 12th Street
in Kansas City, KS; KCT Main 2 west of
Osage Ave. to Kansas Ave. in Kansas
City, KS; KCT’s Blue River Yard (KCT
track nos. 402–405 and 933) and KCT’s
Mill Street Yard (KCT track nos. 1010–
1018, 1020–1023, and 1030–1047) and
certain other KCT leads and tracks (KCT
track nos. 90, 109, 238, 243, 450, 451,
604, 610, 650, 664, 666, 276W, 278W,
280W, 4031, 4033, 4350, 4364, 4653,
4709, 5800, 5538, 1063, 1070, 1091,
6108, 6109, 6411, 6428 and 6481, and
KCT’s rights over Procter & Gamble’s
plant tracks).
The lines that KCTL seeks to acquire
by assignment are: (i) The leads and
tracks located (a) between the facilities
of Inland Container on Kansas Avenue
in Kansas City, KS, and the facilities of
1 Under 49 U.S.C. 10902 and the Board’s rules at
49 CFR 1150.31, if KCTL elects to enter into
agreements with contract operators, the operators
must file a request with the Board for authority
prior to commencing operations.
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Constar Plastics, Inc., on Armourdale
Parkway in Kansas City, KS, and (b)
between the facilities of Lite-Weight
Products, Inc., on Kansas Avenue in
Kansas City, KS, and the facilities of
Ace Pallet on Argentine Boulevard in
Kansas City, KS, (ii) KCS’s 12th Street
yard located south of 12th Street in
Kansas City, MO, and (iii) KCS’s
Armourdale Yard, located near the
facilities of Kaw River Shredding on
South 12th Street in Kansas City, KS.
KCTL states that there are no milepost
designations associated with the rail
lines being leased or assigned. The total
length of the lines is 33.2 track miles
(including yard tracks), including 7.5
miles of KCS tracks incidental to the
principal transaction. KCTL will also
have incidental rights over the KCT
Joint Tracks for continued access to the
tracks and interchange locations.
Interchange with Union Pacific Railroad
Company, BNSF Railway Company,
KCS, Norfolk Southern Railway
Company, and Iowa, Chicago and
Eastern Railroad Corporation will
continue at points in and around Kansas
City where KRR and KCS have
interchanged, or as otherwise agreed to
by KCTL and the other railroads
involved.
This transaction is related to STB
Finance Docket No. 34831, Kansas City
Terminal Railway Company—IntraCorporate Exemption—Kansas City
Transportation Company LLC, wherein
KCT seeks to continue in control of
KCTL upon KCTL’s becoming a Class III
rail carrier.2
KCTL certifies that its projected
revenues will not result in the creation
of a Class II or Class I rail carrier, and
that its projected annual revenues will
not exceed $5 million.
The transaction was expected to be
consummated on March 1, 2006, the
effective date of the exemption (7 days
after the exemption was filed).
If the notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transaction.
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 34830, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 1925
K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, one copy of each
2 On February 27, 2006, the Brotherhood of
Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, a Division of
the Rail Conference, International Brotherhood of
Teamsters, filed a petition for a stay of the
transactions encompassed by both notices of
exemption. The stay request was denied by decision
served on February 28, 2006.
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14575-14576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-2829]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA-2006-23448; Notice 1]
Pipeline Safety: Request for Waiver; Maritimes & Northeast
Pipeline, L.L.C.
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA);
DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent to consider waiver request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C. (M&N) requests a waiver
of compliance for the U.S. portion of its pipeline system in Class 1,
2, and 3 locations to operate at stress levels up to 80 percent; 67
percent; and 56 percent respectively, of the pipeline's specified
minimum yield strength (SMYS).
DATES: Persons interested in submitting comments on the waiver request
described in this Notice must do so by April 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments should reference Docket No. PHMSA-2006-23448 and
may be submitted in the following ways:
DOT Web site: https://dms.dot.gov. To submit comments on
the DOT electronic docket site, click ``Comment/Submissions,'' click
``Continue,'' fill in the requested information, click ``Continue,''
enter your comment, then click ``Submit.''
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management System: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: DOT Docket Management System; Room PL-401
on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
E-Gov Web Site: https://www.Regulations.gov. This site
allows the public to enter comments on any Federal Register notice
issued by any agency.
Instructions: You should identify the docket number, PHMSA-2006-
23448, at the beginning of your comments. If you submit your comments
by mail, you should submit two copies. If you wish to receive
confirmation that PHMSA received your comments, you should include a
self-addressed stamped postcard. Internet users may submit comments at
https://www.regulations.gov, and may access all comments received by DOT
at https://dms.dot.gov by performing a simple search for the docket
number.
Note: All comments will be posted without changes or edits to
https://dms.dot.gov including any personal information provided.
Privacy Act Statement: Anyone may search the electronic form of all
comments received for any of our dockets. You may review DOT's complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477) or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Reynolds by telephone at 202-
366-2786; by fax at 202-366-4566; by mail at DOT, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Pipeline Safety
Program (PHP), 400 7th Street, SW., Room 2103, Washington, DC 20590; or
by e-mail at james.reynolds@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C. requests a waiver of
compliance for the U.S. portion of its pipeline system in Class 1, 2,
and 3 locations to operate at stress levels up to 80 percent; 67
percent; and 56 percent respectively, of the pipeline's SMYS.
Specifically, M&N requests a waiver of compliance from the following
regulatory requirements:
49 CFR 192.111--Design factor (F) for steel pipe;
49 CFR 192.201--Required capacity of pressure relieving
and limiting stations;
49 CFR 192.503--General Requirements;
49 CFR 192.611--Change in class location: Confirmation or
revision of maximum allowable operating pressure; and
49 CFR 192.619--Maximum allowable operating pressure:
Steel or plastic pipelines.
The proposed waiver would apply to approximately 203 miles of M&N's
24-inch diameter pipeline. This portion of pipeline extends from M&N's
Baileyville, Maine compressor station near the U.S./Canada border to
Westbrook, Maine; and includes two compressor stations. The current
maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP) of the mainline system is
1440 pounds per square inch gauge (psig).
M&N placed its pipeline in service on December 1, 1999. The
pipeline is operated by M&N Operating Company, LLC--a wholly owned
subsidiary of Duke Energy Gas Transmission. The pipeline is 24-inch
diameter, Grade X-70 pipe with varying wall thicknesses. One hundred
percent of the pipeline's girth welds were inspected using radiography,
and the pipeline--including girth welds--are coated with fusion bonded
epoxy. M&N tested the Class 1 and 2 pipelines to 125 percent MAOP; the
Class 3 pipeline was tested to 150 percent MAOP. In addition, M&N
performed an in-line inspection of its pipeline in 2002 and no
anomalies were detected.
Pipeline System Analysis
M&N conducted evaluations of the U.S. portion of its pipeline to
confirm whether the system could safely and reliably operate at
increased stress levels. As part of its evaluation, M&N analyzed and
compared the threats imposed on a pipeline operating at 72 percent SMYS
to those imposed on a pipeline operating at 80 percent SMYS; including:
(1) External corrosion; (2) internal corrosion; (3) stress corrosion
cracking; (4) pipe manufacturing; (5) construction; (6) equipment; (7)
immediate failure due to puncture; (8) delayed failure due to resident
defects or damage; (9) incorrect operation; and (10) weather/outside
factors. M&N asserts that any impact(s) that potentially threaten the
integrity of its pipeline, as a consequence of the line operating at
higher stress levels, have been addressed.
[[Page 14576]]
M&N requests a waiver of compliance from the regulatory
requirements at 49 CFR 192.111. This regulation prescribes the design
factor to be used in the design formula in Sec. 192.105. The design
factors are found in the following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design factor
Class location (F)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................................... 0.72
2....................................................... 0.60
3....................................................... 0.50
4....................................................... 0.40
------------------------------------------------------------------------
M&N is proposing to use a design factor for its existing pipeline
of 80 percent SMYS for Class 1; 67 percent SMYS for Class 2; and 56
percent SMYS for Class 3. M&N notes that if the waiver is granted, it
intends to operate its pipeline in the future with a design factor of
80 percent SMYS for Class 1; 60 percent SMYS for Class 2; and 50
percent SMYS for Class 3.
M&N also requests a waiver from Sec. 192.201(a)(2)(i) which states
if the MAOP is 60 psig or more, the pressure may not exceed MAOP plus
10 percent, or the pressure that produces a hoop stress of 75 percent
SMYS, which ever is lower. M&N proposes to set the over pressure
protection for the waiver sections to 104 percent of the pipeline MAOP.
This setting is based on the ratio of 75 percent to 72 percent of SMYS.
M&N additionally requests a waiver from the requirements of Sec.
192.503(c) which limits the maximum hoop stress allowed to 80 percent
of the pipeline's SYMS if air, natural gas, or inert gas is used as the
test medium. M&N desires to test its compressor station piping to 82
percent SMYS.
Section 192.611 requires an operator to confirm or revise the MAOP
of its pipeline if the hoop stress corresponding to the established
MAOP is not commensurate with the present class location. M&N notes
that any class location changes that occur subsequent to this proposed
waiver will be filed under separate waiver requests.
PHMSA will consider M&N's waiver request and whether its proposal
will yield an equivalent or greater degree of safety than that
currently provided by the regulations. After considering any comments
received, PHMSA may grant M&N's waiver request as proposed, with
modifications and conditions, or deny M&N's request. If the waiver is
granted and PHMSA subsequently determines the effect of the waiver is
inconsistent with pipeline safety, PHMSA may revoke the waiver at its
sole discretion.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60118 (c) and 49 CFR 1.53.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 20, 2006.
Joy Kadnar,
Director of Engineering and Emergency Support.
[FR Doc. 06-2829 Filed 3-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P