Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request, 14253-14254 [06-2657]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 21, 2006 / Notices
analyzes, publishes, and disseminates
statistics on the criminal victimization
in the U.S.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: An estimate of the total
number of respondents is 77,100. It will
take the average interviewed respondent
an estimated 23 minutes to respond, the
average non-interviewed respondent an
estimated 7 minutes to respond, the
estimated average follow-up interview is
12 minutes, and the estimated average
follow-up for a non-interview is 1
minute.
6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The total respondent burden
is approximately 62, 620 hours.
If additional information is required,
contact Robert B. Briggs, Clearance
Officer, United States Department of
Justice, Justice Management Division,
Policy and Planning Staff, Patrick Henry
Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: March 15, 2006.
Robert B. Briggs,
Clearance Officer, United States Department
of Justice.
[FR Doc. 06–2661 Filed 3–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–M
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Submission for OMB review;
comment request.
AGENCY:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) has submitted the
following information collection
requirement to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104–13.
This is the second notice for public
comment; the first was published in the
Federal Register at 70 FR 75228, and
twenty-six (26) comments were
received. NSF is forwarding the
proposed renewal submission to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for clearance simultaneously
with the publication of this second
notice. Comments regarding (a) whether
the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimated of burden including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:01 Mar 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
responded, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology should be
addressed to: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for National Science
Foundation, 725–17th Street, NW.,
Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503,
and to Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports
Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Suite 295, Arlington, Virginia 22230 or
send e-mail to splimpto@nsf.gov.
Comments regarding these information
collections are best assured of having
their full effect if received within 30
days of this notification. Copies of the
submission(s) may be obtained by
calling 703–292–7556.
NSF may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number
and the agency informs potential
persons who are to respond to the
collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comment: On December 19, 2005, we
published in the Federal Register (70
FR 75228) a 60-day notice of our intent
to request renewal of this information
collection authority from OMB. In that
notice, we solicited public comments
for 60 days ending February 17, 2006.
Twenty-six (26) comments were
received in response to the public
notice. One comment came from B.
Sachau of Florham Park, NJ, via e-mail
on December 19, 2005. Ms. Sachau
objected to the information collection
but had no specific suggestions for
altering the data collection plans other
than to discontinue them entirely.
Response: NSF believes that because
the comment does not pertain to the
collection of information on the
required forms for which NSF is seeking
OMB approval, NSF is proceeding with
the clearance request.
Comment: Public comments have
been received by NSF from 23 persons
in response to the announcement, as of
the close-out date of February 17, 2006.
These all were the same e-mail
(distributed at the National
Communication Association meeting)
that proposed breaking apart the
Commission fields and placing them in
3 separate categories on the SED Field
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14253
of Study List. In addition, SRS directly
received 2 e-mails from individuals in
the Association for Education in
Journalism and Mass Communication
who opposed the National
Communication Association proposal
for the Field of Study listing.
Response: NSF has taken these
suggestions (along with other
suggestions received on the same topic)
into consideration concerning the
placement of the field of
Communication on the Field of Study
list for respondents to select their
bachelor’s, master’s and doctorate
degree field of study.
Title of Collection: Survey of Earned
Doctorates.
OMB Approval Number: 3145–0019.
Type of Request: Intent to seek
approval to extend an information
collection for three years.
1. Abstract: The National Science
Foundation Act of 1950, as
subsequently amended, includes a
statutory charge to ‘‘provide a central
clearinghouse for the collection,
interpretation, and analysis of data on
scientific and engineering resources,
and to provide a source of information
for policy formulation by other agencies
of the Federal Government.’’ The Survey
of Earned Doctorates is part of an
integrated survey system that meets the
human resources part of this mission.
The Survey of Earned Doctorates
(SED) has been conducted continuously
since 1958 and is jointly sponsored by
six Federal agencies in order to avoid
duplication. It is an accurate, timely
source of information on our Nation’s
most precious resource—highly
educated individuals. Data are obtained
via paper questionnaire or Web option
from each person earning a research
doctorate at the time they receive the
degree. Data are collected on their field
of specialty, educational background,
sources of support in graduate school,
debt level, postgraduation plans for
employment, and demographic
characteristics. For the 2007 SED, minor
changes to questions, based on focus
group and cognitive testing will be
incorporated into the questionnaire.
Also for 2007, a field test of potential
questions about salary after graduation
will be conducted with less than 9
institutions. Based on the field test
results, the intention is to add a salary
question in 2008.
The Federal Government, universities,
researchers, and others use the
information extensively. The National
Science Foundation, as the lead agency,
publishes statistics from the survey in
many reports, but primarily in the
annual publication series, ‘‘Science and
Engineering Doctorates’’. The National
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
14254
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 21, 2006 / Notices
Opinion Research Corporation at the
University of Chicago disseminates a
free interagency report entitled
‘‘Doctorate Recipients from U.S.
Universities: Summary Report.’’ These
reports are available in print and
electronically on the World Wide Web.
The survey will be collected in
conformance with the Privacy Act of
1974. Responses from individuals are
voluntary. NSF will ensure that all
information collected will be kept
strictly confidential and will be used for
research and statistical purposes,
analyzing data, and preparing scientific
reports and articles.
2. Expected Respondents: A total
response rate of 90.8% of the total
42,155 persons who earned a research
doctorate was obtained in the 2004 SED.
This level of response rate has been
consistent for several years. The
respondents will be individuals and the
estimated number of respondents
annually is 47,787 with a response rate
of 92%.
3. Estimate of Burden: The
Foundation estimates that, on average,
19 minutes per respondent will be
required to complete the survey, for a
toal of 12,465 hours for all respondents
(based on the 2004 SED numbers). Also,
for the approximately 3,000 respondents
in the field test on a salary question,
there would be approximately another
50 hours of response time. The total
response burden is therefore estimated
at 12,171 hours for the 2007 SED. This
is slightly higher than the last annual
estimate approved by OMB due
primarily to an increased number of
respondents since the last clearance
request.
Dated: March 15, 2006.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 06–2657 Filed 3–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to
submit an information collection
request to OMB and solicitation of
public comment.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The NRC is preparing a
submittal to OMB for review of
continued approval of information
collections under the provisions of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:01 Mar 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Information pertaining to the
requirement to be submitted:
1. The title of the information
collection: NRC Form 590, Application/
Permit for Use of the Two White Flint
North (TWFN) Auditorium.
2. Current OMB approval number:
3150–0181.
3. How often the collection is
required: Each time public use of the
auditorium is requested.
4. Who is required or asked to report:
Members of the public requesting use of
the NRC Auditorium.
5. The number of annual respondents:
5.
6. The number of hours needed
annually to complete the requirement or
request: 1.25 hours (15 minutes per
request).
7. Abstract: In accordance with the
Public Buildings Act of 1959, an
agreement was reached between the
Maryland-National Capital Park and
Planning Commission (MPPC), the
General Services Administration (GSA),
and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
that the NRC auditorium will be made
available for public use. Public users of
the auditorium will be required to
complete NRC Form 590, Application/
Permit for Use of Two White Flint North
(TWFN) Auditorium. The information is
needed to allow for administrative and
security review and scheduling, and to
make a determination that there are no
anticipated problems with the requester
prior to utilization of the facility.
Submit, by May 22, 2006, comments
that address the following questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of
information necessary for the NRC to
properly perform its functions? Does the
information have practical utility?
2. Is the burden estimate accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the
information collection be minimized,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology?
A copy of the draft supporting
statement may be viewed free of charge
at the NRC Public Document Room, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Room O–1 F21, Rockville, MD
20852. OMB clearance requests are
available at the NRC world wide web
site: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
doc-comment/omb/. The
document will be available on the NRC
home page site for 60 days after the
signature date of this notice.
Comments and questions about the
information collection requirements
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
may be directed to the NRC Clearance
Officer, Brenda Jo. Shelton (T–5 F52),
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, by
telephone at 301–415–7233, or by
Internet electronic mail to
INFOCOLLECTS@NRC.GOV.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day
of March 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brenda Jo. Shelton,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information
Services.
[FR Doc. E6–4086 Filed 3–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards; Subcommittee Meeting on
Planning and Procedures; Notice of
Meeting
The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning
and Procedures will hold a meeting on
April 5, 2006, Room T–2B1, 11545
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
The entire meeting will be open to
public attendance, with the exception of
a portion that may be closed pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (6) to discuss
organizational and personnel matters
that relate solely to the internal
personnel rules and practices of the
ACRS, and information the release of
which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal
privacy.
The agenda for the subject meeting
shall be as follows:
Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 10:30 a.m.–
12 Noon
The Subcommittee will discuss
proposed ACRS activities and related
matters. The Subcommittee will gather
information, analyze relevant issues and
facts, and formulate proposed positions
and actions, as appropriate, for
deliberation by the full Committee.
Members of the public desiring to
provide oral statements and/or written
comments should notify the Designated
Federal Official, Mr. Sam Duraiswamy
(telephone: 301–415–7364) between
7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET) five days
prior to the meeting, if possible, so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
Electronic recordings will be permitted
only during those portions of the
meeting that are open to the public.
Further information regarding this
meeting can be obtained by contacting
the Designated Federal Official between
7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET). Persons
planning to attend this meeting are
urged to contact the above named
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14253-14254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-2657]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Submission for OMB review; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) has submitted the
following information collection requirement to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13.
This is the second notice for public comment; the first was published
in the Federal Register at 70 FR 75228, and twenty-six (26) comments
were received. NSF is forwarding the proposed renewal submission to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance simultaneously with
the publication of this second notice. Comments regarding (a) whether
the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimated of
burden including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information
to be collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to responded, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of information technology should
be addressed to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB,
Attention: Desk Officer for National Science Foundation, 725-17th
Street, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, and to Suzanne H.
Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Suite 295, Arlington, Virginia 22230 or send e-mail
to splimpto@nsf.gov. Comments regarding these information collections
are best assured of having their full effect if received within 30 days
of this notification. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by
calling 703-292-7556.
NSF may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless
the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such persons are not required to
respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comment: On December 19, 2005, we published in the Federal Register
(70 FR 75228) a 60-day notice of our intent to request renewal of this
information collection authority from OMB. In that notice, we solicited
public comments for 60 days ending February 17, 2006. Twenty-six (26)
comments were received in response to the public notice. One comment
came from B. Sachau of Florham Park, NJ, via e-mail on December 19,
2005. Ms. Sachau objected to the information collection but had no
specific suggestions for altering the data collection plans other than
to discontinue them entirely.
Response: NSF believes that because the comment does not pertain to
the collection of information on the required forms for which NSF is
seeking OMB approval, NSF is proceeding with the clearance request.
Comment: Public comments have been received by NSF from 23 persons
in response to the announcement, as of the close-out date of February
17, 2006. These all were the same e-mail (distributed at the National
Communication Association meeting) that proposed breaking apart the
Commission fields and placing them in 3 separate categories on the SED
Field of Study List. In addition, SRS directly received 2 e-mails from
individuals in the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass
Communication who opposed the National Communication Association
proposal for the Field of Study listing.
Response: NSF has taken these suggestions (along with other
suggestions received on the same topic) into consideration concerning
the placement of the field of Communication on the Field of Study list
for respondents to select their bachelor's, master's and doctorate
degree field of study.
Title of Collection: Survey of Earned Doctorates.
OMB Approval Number: 3145-0019.
Type of Request: Intent to seek approval to extend an information
collection for three years.
1. Abstract: The National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as
subsequently amended, includes a statutory charge to ``provide a
central clearinghouse for the collection, interpretation, and analysis
of data on scientific and engineering resources, and to provide a
source of information for policy formulation by other agencies of the
Federal Government.'' The Survey of Earned Doctorates is part of an
integrated survey system that meets the human resources part of this
mission.
The Survey of Earned Doctorates (SED) has been conducted
continuously since 1958 and is jointly sponsored by six Federal
agencies in order to avoid duplication. It is an accurate, timely
source of information on our Nation's most precious resource--highly
educated individuals. Data are obtained via paper questionnaire or Web
option from each person earning a research doctorate at the time they
receive the degree. Data are collected on their field of specialty,
educational background, sources of support in graduate school, debt
level, postgraduation plans for employment, and demographic
characteristics. For the 2007 SED, minor changes to questions, based on
focus group and cognitive testing will be incorporated into the
questionnaire. Also for 2007, a field test of potential questions about
salary after graduation will be conducted with less than 9
institutions. Based on the field test results, the intention is to add
a salary question in 2008.
The Federal Government, universities, researchers, and others use
the information extensively. The National Science Foundation, as the
lead agency, publishes statistics from the survey in many reports, but
primarily in the annual publication series, ``Science and Engineering
Doctorates''. The National
[[Page 14254]]
Opinion Research Corporation at the University of Chicago disseminates
a free interagency report entitled ``Doctorate Recipients from U.S.
Universities: Summary Report.'' These reports are available in print
and electronically on the World Wide Web.
The survey will be collected in conformance with the Privacy Act of
1974. Responses from individuals are voluntary. NSF will ensure that
all information collected will be kept strictly confidential and will
be used for research and statistical purposes, analyzing data, and
preparing scientific reports and articles.
2. Expected Respondents: A total response rate of 90.8% of the
total 42,155 persons who earned a research doctorate was obtained in
the 2004 SED. This level of response rate has been consistent for
several years. The respondents will be individuals and the estimated
number of respondents annually is 47,787 with a response rate of 92%.
3. Estimate of Burden: The Foundation estimates that, on average,
19 minutes per respondent will be required to complete the survey, for
a toal of 12,465 hours for all respondents (based on the 2004 SED
numbers). Also, for the approximately 3,000 respondents in the field
test on a salary question, there would be approximately another 50
hours of response time. The total response burden is therefore
estimated at 12,171 hours for the 2007 SED. This is slightly higher
than the last annual estimate approved by OMB due primarily to an
increased number of respondents since the last clearance request.
Dated: March 15, 2006.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 06-2657 Filed 3-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M