International Banking Operations, 13934-13937 [06-2629]
Download as PDF
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
13934
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
their contribution or donation to the
candidate, political committee, or other
organization.
(ii) A communication that provides
instructions on how or where to send
contributions or donations, including
providing a phone number specifically
dedicated to facilitating the making of
contributions or donations. However, a
communication does not, in and of
itself, satisfy the definition of ‘‘to
solicit’’ merely because it includes a
mailing address or phone number that is
not specifically dedicated to facilitating
the making of contributions or
donations.
(iii) A communication that identifies
a Web address where the Web page
displayed is specifically dedicated to
facilitating the making of a contribution
or donation, or automatically redirects
the Internet user to such a page, or
exclusively displays a link to such a
page. However, a communication does
not, in and of itself, satisfy the
definition of ‘‘to solicit’’ merely because
it includes the address of a Web page
that is not specifically dedicated to
facilitating the making of a contribution
or donation.
(2) The following statements
constitute solicitations:
(i) ‘‘Please give $100,000 to Group X.’’
(ii) ‘‘It is important for our State party
to receive at least $100,000 from each of
you in this election.’’
(iii) ‘‘Group X has always helped me
financially in my elections. Keep them
in mind this fall.’’
(iv) ‘‘X is an effective State party
organization; it needs to obtain as many
$100,000 donations as possible.’’
(v) ‘‘Giving $100,000 to Group X
would be a very smart idea.’’
(vi) ‘‘Send all contributions to the
following address * * *.’’
(vii) ‘‘I am not permitted to ask for
contributions, but unsolicited
contributions will be accepted at the
following address * * *.’’
(viii) ‘‘Group X is having a fundraiser
this week; you should go.’’
(ix) ‘‘You have reached the limit of
what you may contribute directly to my
campaign, but you can further help my
campaign by assisting the State party.’’
(x) A candidate hands a potential
donor a list of people who have
contributed to a group and the amounts
of their contributions. The candidate
says, ‘‘I see you are not on the list.’’
(xi) ‘‘I will not forget those who
contribute at this crucial stage.’’
(xii) ‘‘The candidate will be very
pleased if we can count on you for
$10,000.’’
(xiii) ‘‘Your contribution to this
campaign would mean a great deal to
the entire party and to me personally.’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:02 Mar 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
(xiv) Candidate says to potential
donor: ‘‘The money you will help us
raise will allow us to communicate our
message to the voters through Labor
Day.’’
(xv) ‘‘I appreciate all you’ve done in
the past for our party in this State.
Looking ahead, we face some tough
elections. I’d be very happy if you could
maintain the same level of financial
support for our State party this year.’’
(xvi) The head of Group X solicits a
contribution from a potential donor in
the presence of a candidate. The donor
asks the candidate if the contribution to
Group X would be a good idea and
would help the candidate’s campaign.
The candidate nods affirmatively.
(3) The following statements do not
constitute solicitations:
(i) During a policy speech, the
candidate says: ‘‘Thank you for your
support of the Democratic Party.’’
(ii) At a ticket-wide rally, the
candidate says: ‘‘Thank you for your
support of my campaign.’’
(iii) At a Labor Day rally, the
candidate says: ‘‘Thank you for your
past financial support of the Republican
Party.’’
(iv) At a GOTV rally, the candidate
says: ‘‘Thank you for your continuing
support.’’
(v) At a ticket-wide rally, the
candidate says: ‘‘It is critical that we
support the entire Democratic ticket in
November.’’
(vi) A Federal officeholder says: ‘‘Our
Senator has done a great job for us this
year. The policies she has vigorously
promoted in the Senate have really
helped the economy of the State.’’
(vii) A candidate says: ‘‘Thanks to
your contributions we have been able to
support our President, Senator and
Representative during the past election
cycle.’’
(n) To direct. For the purposes of part
300, to direct means to guide, directly or
indirectly, a person who has expressed
an intent to make a contribution,
donation, transfer of funds, or otherwise
provide anything of value, by
identifying a candidate, political
committee or organization, for the
receipt of such funds, or things of value.
The contribution, donation, transfer, or
thing of value may be made or provided
directly or through a conduit or
intermediary. Direction does not
include merely providing information or
guidance as to the applicability of a
particular law or regulation.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: March 13, 2006.
Michael E. Toner,
Chairman, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 06–2623 Filed 3–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 211
[Regulation K; Docket No. R–1147]
International Banking Operations
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board) has
adopted a final rule to require Edge and
Agreement corporations and U.S.
branches, agencies, and representative
offices of foreign banks supervised by
the Board to establish and maintain
procedures reasonably designed to
assure and monitor compliance with the
Bank Secrecy Act and the regulations
issued thereunder.
DATES: This rule is effective April 19,
2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nina A. Nichols, Assistant Director,
(202) 452–2961, Shaswat K. Das,
Counsel, (202) 452–2428, or Bridget M.
Neill, Assistant Director, (202) 452–
5235, Division of Banking Supervision
and Regulation; or Ann E. Misback,
Associate General Counsel, (202) 452–
3788, or Jennifer Sutton, Attorney, (202)
452–3564, Legal Division. For users of
Telecommunications Devices for the
Deaf (TDD) only, contact (202) 263–
4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Regulations on Bank Secrecy Act
Compliance Programs
Subchapter II of chapter 53 of Title
31, United States Code, commonly
known as the ‘‘Bank Secrecy Act,’’
generally requires financial institutions
to, among other things, keep records and
make reports that have a high degree of
usefulness in criminal, tax, or regulatory
proceedings. Section 1359 of the AntiDrug Abuse Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99–570,
requires the supervisory agencies to
prescribe regulations requiring
institutions they regulate to establish
and maintain procedures reasonably
designed to assure and monitor
compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act
and to review such procedures during
the course of their examinations.1
1 See
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
12 U.S.C. 1818(s).
20MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
The supervisory agencies’
implementing regulations incorporate
the minimum components of a
compliance program as generally set
forth in the Bank Secrecy Act at 31
U.S.C. 5318(h). These components are:
(i) A system of internal controls to
assure ongoing compliance; (ii)
independent testing of compliance by
the institution’s personnel or by an
outside party; (iii) the designation of an
individual or individuals responsible
for coordinating and monitoring day-today compliance; and (iv) training for
appropriate personnel.2
On May 30, 2003, the Board
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register (68
FR 32434) to amend Regulation K (12
CFR part 211) to require Edge and
Agreement corporations and U.S.
branches, agencies, and representative
offices of foreign banks supervised by
the Board to establish and maintain
procedures reasonably designed to
assure and monitor compliance with the
Bank Secrecy Act.
B. Overview of Comments Received
The Board received five comments
regarding the proposed rule.
Commenters generally supported the
clarification provided by the proposed
rule regarding the Bank Secrecy Act
compliance obligations of Edge and
Agreement corporations and U.S.
branches, agencies, and representative
offices of foreign banks. Specific issues
raised by the commenters are discussed
below.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
II. Analysis of Comments
A. Requirement for Program Approval
The proposed rule would require a
branch, agency, or representative office
of a foreign bank operating in the United
States (except for a Federal branch, a
Federal agency, or a state-chartered
branch that is insured by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation) to
establish a Bank Secrecy Act
compliance program with the approval
of the foreign bank’s board of directors.
Two commenters expressed concern
regarding the proposed approval
process. One commenter observed that
it is often difficult to obtain timely
approval of ‘‘local’’ U.S. matters by the
board of directors of the foreign bank in
the home country. The other commenter
noted that a U.S. branch, agency, or
representative office may not itself have
a board of directors and suggested that
in such situation approval by the
entity’s senior management in the
United States should be sufficient.
2 The
Board’s implementing regulation is found
in Regulation H at section 208.63 (12 CFR 208.63).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:02 Mar 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
Commenters stated that regulators, in
other instances, have addressed
logistical difficulties of securing head
office approval by allowing, for
example, a local committee, advisory
board, senior management, or regional
headquarters located in the United
States to perform the functions of a
board of directors.
The Board believes the Bank Secrecy
Act program requires attention at the
highest levels of management. Boards of
directors of state member banks are not
permitted to delegate approval of the
Bank Secrecy Act compliance program.3
U.S. branches, agencies, and
representative offices of foreign banks
generally will not have separate boards
of directors. Nevertheless, these offices
need to be able to establish and
implement amendments to their Bank
Secrecy Act programs as necessary.
Accordingly, the final rule provides that
a foreign bank’s board of directors may
appoint a delegee to approve the
required Bank Secrecy Act program so
long as the delegee is acting under the
express authority of the board of
directors to approve the Bank Secrecy
Act program.
B. Risk-Based Program
One commenter requested that the
Board clarify in the preamble to the
final rule whether Edge and Agreement
corporations and U.S. branches,
agencies, and representative offices of
foreign banks are expected to develop
risk-based programs under the rule. The
Board has consistently interpreted
Regulation H to require each bank to
develop a Bank Secrecy Act compliance
program that is tailored to address the
risks presented by its business
operations and customer base, provided
that the minimum requirements set
forth in section 208.63 of Regulation H
are met. Under longstanding existing
supervisory practice, as reflected in the
final rule amending Regulation K, the
Board expects Edge and Agreement
corporations and U.S. branches,
agencies, and representative offices of
foreign banks to develop and implement
Bank Secrecy Act compliance programs
that are risk-based.
C. Text of Regulation H Requirements
The proposed rule incorporated by
reference the minimum requirements for
Bank Secrecy Act compliance programs
that are set forth in Regulation H at
section 208.63 (12 CFR 208.63). One
commenter suggested that the rule
would be easier to use and more
3 See 12 CFR 208.63(b). (‘‘The compliance
program shall be reduced to writing, approved by
the board of directors, and noted in the minutes.’’)
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13935
understandable if the final rule set forth
the full text of the regulatory
requirements found in Regulation H.
Many cross-references are made in
Board regulations to provisions
contained elsewhere. For example, the
suspicious activity reporting rule for
state member banks is found at 12 CFR
208.62 and is cross-referenced in
Regulations K and Y at 12 CFR 211.5(k),
211.24(f), and 225.4(f). Similarly, the
Customer Identification Program rule is
found at 31 CFR 103.121 and is crossreferenced in Regulations H and K at 12
CFR 208.63(b)(2), 12 CFR 211.5(m)(2),
and 211.24(j)(2). The Board believes this
format is sufficiently clear; as a result,
the final rule continues to incorporate
by reference the text of the minimum
requirements for Bank Secrecy Act
compliance programs found in section
208.63 of Regulation H.
D. Applicability to Offshore Interests of
U.S. Banking Organizations
The proposed rule by its terms would
require Edge and Agreement
corporations and U.S. branches,
agencies, and representative offices of
foreign banks (except for a Federal
branch, a Federal agency, or a statechartered branch that is insured by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation)
to establish Bank Secrecy Act
compliance programs. One commenter
requested that the final rule clarify that
it does not apply to the investments of
U.S. banks or Edge and Agreement
corporations in offshore entities,
whether those investments are
subsidiaries, joint ventures, or portfolio
investments. The definitions of
‘‘financial institution’’ and ‘‘bank’’ in
the Bank Secrecy Act and regulations
thereunder do not encompass foreign
offices or foreign investments of U.S.
banks or Edge and Agreement
corporations.4 Nevertheless, banks are
expected to have policies, procedures,
and processes in place at all their
branches and offices to protect against
risks of money laundering and terrorist
financing. Moreover, an enterprise-wide
anti-money laundering compliance
program that assesses risk on a
consolidated basis across all activities,
business lines, and legal entities may be
an essential tool in managing such risks.
III. Regulatory Analysis
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
In accordance with section 4(a) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
604(a)), the Board must publish a final
regulatory flexibility analysis with this
rulemaking. The final rule creates a
4 See
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(2); 31 CFR 103.11(c).
20MRR1
13936
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
uniform regulatory standard for
ensuring and examining compliance
with applicable law and regulation.
Institutions covered by the rule,
whether small or large, are already
required to have policies and
procedures substantially equivalent to
those required by the rule. Accordingly,
the Board certifies that this final rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
business entities.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506; 5 CFR 1320 Appendix A.1), the
Board has reviewed the final rule under
the authority delegated to the Board by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). The collections of information
associated with this rulemaking are
found in 12 CFR 211.5 and 211.24. This
information is required to evidence
compliance with the requirements of the
Bank Secrecy Act, and the regulations
promulgated thereunder. The
recordkeepers are for-profit financial
institutions.
The Federal Reserve may not conduct
or sponsor, and an organization is not
required to respond to, this collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The OMB control number is 7100–0310.
The final rule does not change the
collection of information requirements
set forth in the proposed rule. The final
rule applies only to Edge and
Agreement corporations and U.S.
branches, agencies, and representative
offices of foreign banks supervised by
the Board. The final rule requires each
of those entities to establish a written
compliance program that includes the
following components: (i) A system of
internal controls to assure ongoing
compliance; (ii) independent testing of
compliance by the institution’s
personnel or by an outside party; (iii)
the designation of an individual or
individuals responsible for coordinating
and monitoring day-to-day compliance;
and (iv) training for appropriate
personnel. The compliance program
must be approved by the board of
directors (and noted in the minutes) or
by a delegee of the foreign bank’s board
of directors.
The commenters generally agreed that
there would be little burden associated
with the requirements for establishing a
compliance program for the Bank
Secrecy Act because the measures
involved in the program are consistent
with existing requirements under the
Bank Secrecy Act at 31 U.S.C. 5318(h)
and usual and customary business
practices. The Board continues to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:02 Mar 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
believe that the estimated average
annual burden of 16 hours per
institution is accurate, because
branches, agencies, and representative
offices of foreign banks and Edge and
Agreement corporations are currently
subject to the program requirements of
section 5318(h) of the Bank Secrecy Act.
Thus, the rule adopted today clarifies
the existing obligations of these entities
under the Board’s rules. Because the
records would be maintained at
branches, agencies, and representative
offices of foreign banks and Edge and
Agreement corporations, and the
records are not provided to the Federal
Reserve, no issue of confidentiality
under the Freedom of Information Act
arises.
Estimated number of financial
institutions subject to the final rule: 520.
Estimated average annual burden for
establishing the written compliance
program per financial institution: 16
hours (2 business days).
Estimated total annual burden: 8,320
hours.
The Federal Reserve has a continuing
interest in the public’s opinion of our
collections of information. At any time,
comments regarding any aspect of this
collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing the burden may
be sent to: Ms. Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20551; and to the Office of
Management and Budget, Paperwork
Reduction Project (OMB No. 7100–
0310), Washington, DC 20503.
IV. Use of Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-LeachBliley Act, Pub. L. 106–102, requires the
Board to use ‘‘plain language’’ in all
proposed and final rules published after
January 1, 2000. The Board requested
comment on whether there were ways to
make the proposed rule easier to
understand. One commenter suggested
that the rule would be easier to use if
it set forth the full text of the regulatory
requirements found in section 208.63.
For the reasons discussed above, the
Board has determined to continue to
incorporate by reference the text of the
minimum requirements for Bank
Secrecy Act compliance programs found
in section 208.63 of Regulation H. The
Board believes that the final rule is
written plainly and presented clearly.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 211
Exports, Federal Reserve System,
Foreign banking, Holding companies,
Investments, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, part 211 of chapter II of title
12 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
I
PART 211—INTERNATIONAL
BANKING OPERATIONS
(REGULATION K)
1. The authority citation for 12 CFR
part 211 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 221 et seq., 1818,
1835a, 1841 et seq., 3101 et seq., and 3901
et seq.; 15 U.S.C. 6801 and 6805; 31 U.S.C.
5318.
2. In § 211.5 add new paragraph (m)(1)
to read as follows:
I
§ 211.5
Edge and agreement corporations.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Procedures for monitoring Bank
Secrecy Act compliance.
(1) Establishment of Compliance
Program. Each Edge corporation and
each agreement corporation shall, in
accordance with the provisions of
§ 208.63 of the Board’s Regulation H, 12
CFR 208.63, develop and provide for the
continued administration of a program
reasonably designed to assure and
monitor compliance with the provisions
of subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31,
United States Code, the Bank Secrecy
Act, and the implementing regulations
promulgated thereunder by the
Department of the Treasury at 31 CFR
part 103. The compliance program shall
be reduced to writing, approved by the
board of directors, and noted in the
minutes.
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. In § 211.24 add new paragraph (j)(1)
to read as follows:
§ 211.24 Approval of offices of foreign
banks; procedures for applications;
standards for approval; representative
office activities and standards for approval;
preservation of existing authority.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Procedures for monitoring Bank
Secrecy Act compliance.
(1) Establishment of Compliance
Program. Except for a Federal branch or
a Federal agency or a state branch that
is insured by the FDIC, a branch,
agency, or representative office of a
foreign bank operating in the United
States shall, in accordance with the
provisions of § 208.63 of the Board’s
Regulation H, 12 CFR 208.63, develop
and provide for the continued
administration of a program reasonably
designed to assure and monitor
compliance with the provisions of
subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31,
United States Code, the Bank Secrecy
Act, and the implementing regulations
promulgated thereunder by the
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 53 / Monday, March 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Department of the Treasury at 31 CFR
part 103. The compliance program shall
be reduced to writing, and either:
(i) Approved by the foreign bank’s
board of directors and noted in the
minutes, or
(ii) Approved by a delegee acting
under the express authority of the board
of directors to approve the Bank Secrecy
Act compliance program.
*
*
*
*
*
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, March 15, 2006.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 06–2629 Filed 3–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
29 CFR Part 2590
RIN 1210–AA62
Mental Health Parity
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Interim final amendment to
regulation.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains an
interim final amendment to modify the
sunset date of interim final regulations
under the Mental Health Parity Act
(MHPA) to be consistent with legislation
passed during the 109th Congress.
DATES: Effective date. The interim final
amendment is effective December 31,
2005. Applicability dates. The
requirements of the interim final
amendment apply to group health plans
and health insurance issuers offering
health insurance coverage in connection
with a group health plan beginning
December 31, 2005. The MHPA interim
final amendment extends the sunset
date from December 31, 2005 to
December 31, 2006. Pursuant to the
extended sunset date, MHPA
requirements apply to benefits for
services furnished before December 31,
2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne Bach, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, Department of
Labor, at (202) 693–8335.
Customer Service Information:
Individuals interested in obtaining
additional information on the Mental
Health Parity Act and other health care
laws may request copies of Department
of Labor publications concerning
changes in health care law by calling the
EBSA Toll-Free Hotline at 1–866–444-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:02 Mar 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
EBSA (3272), or access the publications
on-line at https://www.dol.gov/ebsa, the
Department of Labor’s Web site.
Information on the Mental Health Parity
Act and other health care laws is also
available on the Department of Labor’s
interactive Web pages, Health Elaws
(https://www.dol.gov/elaws/ebsa/health).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
The Mental Health Parity Act of 1996
(MHPA) was enacted on September 26,
1996 (Pub. L. 104–204, 110 Stat. 2944).
MHPA amended the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA) and the Public Health Service
Act (PHS Act) to provide for parity in
the application of annual and lifetime
dollar limits on mental health benefits
with dollar limits on medical/surgical
benefits. Provisions implementing
MHPA were later added to the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (Code) under the
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 (Pub. L.
105–34, 111 Stat. 1080).
The provisions of MHPA, as originally
enacted, are set forth in Part 7 of
Subtitle B of Title I of ERISA, Chapter
100 of Subtitle K of the Code, and Title
XXVII of the PHS Act.1 The MHPA
provisions in ERISA generally apply to
all group health plans other than
governmental plans, church plans, and
certain other plans. These provisions
also apply to health insurance issuers
that offer health insurance coverage in
connection with such group health
plans. Generally, the Secretary of Labor
enforces the MHPA provisions in
ERISA, except that no enforcement
action may be taken by the Secretary
against issuers. However, individuals
may generally pursue actions against
issuers under ERISA and, in some
circumstances, under state law.
B. Overview of MHPA
The MHPA provisions set forth in
section 712 of ERISA apply to a group
health plan (or health insurance
coverage offered by issuers in
connection with a group health plan)
that provides both medical/surgical
benefits and mental health benefits.
MHPA’s original text included a sunset
provision specifying that MHPA’s
provisions applied to benefits for
services furnished before September 30,
2001. On December 22, 1997, the
Departments of Labor, the Treasury, and
Health and Human Services issued
interim final regulations under MHPA
in the Federal Register (62 FR 66931).
1 Part 7 of Subtitle B of Title 1 of ERISA, Chapter
100 of Subtitle K of the Code, and Title XXVII of
the PHS Act were added by the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA),
Pub. L. 104–191.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13937
The interim final regulations included
this statutory sunset date.
On January 10, 2002, President Bush
signed H.R. 3061 (Pub. L. 107–116, 115
Stat. 2177), the 2002 Appropriations Act
for the Departments of Labor, Health
and Human Services, and Education.
This legislation extended MHPA’s
original sunset date under ERISA, the
Code, and the PHS Act, so that MHPA’s
provisions would apply to benefits for
services furnished before December 31,
2002.
On March 9, 2002, President Bush
signed H.R. 3090, the Job Creation and
Worker Assistance Act of 2002 (Pub. L.
107–147, 116 Stat. 21), that included an
amendment to section 9812 of the Code
(the mental health parity provisions).
This legislation further extended
MHPA’s original sunset date under the
Code to December 31, 2003.
On September 27, 2002, the
Department of Labor issued an interim
final amendment for mental health
parity in the Federal Register (67 FR
60859). The interim final amendment
included the new statutory sunset date
under H.R. 3061, so that MHPA’s
provisions would apply to benefits for
services furnished before December 31,
2002. The Department made the
effective date of this interim final
amendment to the regulations
September 30, 2001.
On December 2, 2002, President Bush
signed H.R. 5716, the Mental Health
Parity Reauthorization Act of 2002 (Pub.
L. 107–313, 116 Stat. 2457), an
amendment to section 712 of ERISA and
Section 2705 of the PHS Act. This
legislation further extended MHPA’s
original sunset date under ERISA and
the PHS Act to December 31, 2003. On
April 14, 2003, the Department of Labor
issued an interim final amendment for
mental health parity in the Federal
Register (68 FR 18048). The interim
final amendment included the new
statutory sunset date under H.R. 5716,
so that MHPA’s provisions would apply
to benefits for services furnished before
December 31, 2003.
On December 19, 2003, President
Bush signed S. 1929, the Mental Health
Parity Reauthorization Act of 2003 (Pub.
L. 108–197, 117 Stat. 2998), an
amendment to section 712 of ERISA and
Section 2705 of the PHS Act. This
legislation further extended MHPA’s
original sunset date under ERISA and
the PHS Act to December 31, 2004. On
January 26, 2004, the Department of
Labor issued an interim final
amendment for mental health parity in
the Federal Register (69 FR 3815). The
final rule included the new statutory
sunset date under S. 1929, so that
MHPA’s provisions would apply to
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13934-13937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-2629]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 211
[Regulation K; Docket No. R-1147]
International Banking Operations
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board)
has adopted a final rule to require Edge and Agreement corporations and
U.S. branches, agencies, and representative offices of foreign banks
supervised by the Board to establish and maintain procedures reasonably
designed to assure and monitor compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and
the regulations issued thereunder.
DATES: This rule is effective April 19, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nina A. Nichols, Assistant Director,
(202) 452-2961, Shaswat K. Das, Counsel, (202) 452-2428, or Bridget M.
Neill, Assistant Director, (202) 452-5235, Division of Banking
Supervision and Regulation; or Ann E. Misback, Associate General
Counsel, (202) 452-3788, or Jennifer Sutton, Attorney, (202) 452-3564,
Legal Division. For users of Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf
(TDD) only, contact (202) 263-4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Regulations on Bank Secrecy Act Compliance Programs
Subchapter II of chapter 53 of Title 31, United States Code,
commonly known as the ``Bank Secrecy Act,'' generally requires
financial institutions to, among other things, keep records and make
reports that have a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax, or
regulatory proceedings. Section 1359 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of
1986, Pub. L. 99-570, requires the supervisory agencies to prescribe
regulations requiring institutions they regulate to establish and
maintain procedures reasonably designed to assure and monitor
compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and to review such procedures
during the course of their examinations.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 12 U.S.C. 1818(s).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 13935]]
The supervisory agencies' implementing regulations incorporate the
minimum components of a compliance program as generally set forth in
the Bank Secrecy Act at 31 U.S.C. 5318(h). These components are: (i) A
system of internal controls to assure ongoing compliance; (ii)
independent testing of compliance by the institution's personnel or by
an outside party; (iii) the designation of an individual or individuals
responsible for coordinating and monitoring day-to-day compliance; and
(iv) training for appropriate personnel.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Board's implementing regulation is found in Regulation H
at section 208.63 (12 CFR 208.63).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 30, 2003, the Board published a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register (68 FR 32434) to amend Regulation K
(12 CFR part 211) to require Edge and Agreement corporations and U.S.
branches, agencies, and representative offices of foreign banks
supervised by the Board to establish and maintain procedures reasonably
designed to assure and monitor compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act.
B. Overview of Comments Received
The Board received five comments regarding the proposed rule.
Commenters generally supported the clarification provided by the
proposed rule regarding the Bank Secrecy Act compliance obligations of
Edge and Agreement corporations and U.S. branches, agencies, and
representative offices of foreign banks. Specific issues raised by the
commenters are discussed below.
II. Analysis of Comments
A. Requirement for Program Approval
The proposed rule would require a branch, agency, or representative
office of a foreign bank operating in the United States (except for a
Federal branch, a Federal agency, or a state-chartered branch that is
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) to establish a
Bank Secrecy Act compliance program with the approval of the foreign
bank's board of directors. Two commenters expressed concern regarding
the proposed approval process. One commenter observed that it is often
difficult to obtain timely approval of ``local'' U.S. matters by the
board of directors of the foreign bank in the home country. The other
commenter noted that a U.S. branch, agency, or representative office
may not itself have a board of directors and suggested that in such
situation approval by the entity's senior management in the United
States should be sufficient. Commenters stated that regulators, in
other instances, have addressed logistical difficulties of securing
head office approval by allowing, for example, a local committee,
advisory board, senior management, or regional headquarters located in
the United States to perform the functions of a board of directors.
The Board believes the Bank Secrecy Act program requires attention
at the highest levels of management. Boards of directors of state
member banks are not permitted to delegate approval of the Bank Secrecy
Act compliance program.\3\ U.S. branches, agencies, and representative
offices of foreign banks generally will not have separate boards of
directors. Nevertheless, these offices need to be able to establish and
implement amendments to their Bank Secrecy Act programs as necessary.
Accordingly, the final rule provides that a foreign bank's board of
directors may appoint a delegee to approve the required Bank Secrecy
Act program so long as the delegee is acting under the express
authority of the board of directors to approve the Bank Secrecy Act
program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See 12 CFR 208.63(b). (``The compliance program shall be
reduced to writing, approved by the board of directors, and noted in
the minutes.'')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Risk-Based Program
One commenter requested that the Board clarify in the preamble to
the final rule whether Edge and Agreement corporations and U.S.
branches, agencies, and representative offices of foreign banks are
expected to develop risk-based programs under the rule. The Board has
consistently interpreted Regulation H to require each bank to develop a
Bank Secrecy Act compliance program that is tailored to address the
risks presented by its business operations and customer base, provided
that the minimum requirements set forth in section 208.63 of Regulation
H are met. Under longstanding existing supervisory practice, as
reflected in the final rule amending Regulation K, the Board expects
Edge and Agreement corporations and U.S. branches, agencies, and
representative offices of foreign banks to develop and implement Bank
Secrecy Act compliance programs that are risk-based.
C. Text of Regulation H Requirements
The proposed rule incorporated by reference the minimum
requirements for Bank Secrecy Act compliance programs that are set
forth in Regulation H at section 208.63 (12 CFR 208.63). One commenter
suggested that the rule would be easier to use and more understandable
if the final rule set forth the full text of the regulatory
requirements found in Regulation H.
Many cross-references are made in Board regulations to provisions
contained elsewhere. For example, the suspicious activity reporting
rule for state member banks is found at 12 CFR 208.62 and is cross-
referenced in Regulations K and Y at 12 CFR 211.5(k), 211.24(f), and
225.4(f). Similarly, the Customer Identification Program rule is found
at 31 CFR 103.121 and is cross-referenced in Regulations H and K at 12
CFR 208.63(b)(2), 12 CFR 211.5(m)(2), and 211.24(j)(2). The Board
believes this format is sufficiently clear; as a result, the final rule
continues to incorporate by reference the text of the minimum
requirements for Bank Secrecy Act compliance programs found in section
208.63 of Regulation H.
D. Applicability to Offshore Interests of U.S. Banking Organizations
The proposed rule by its terms would require Edge and Agreement
corporations and U.S. branches, agencies, and representative offices of
foreign banks (except for a Federal branch, a Federal agency, or a
state-chartered branch that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation) to establish Bank Secrecy Act compliance programs. One
commenter requested that the final rule clarify that it does not apply
to the investments of U.S. banks or Edge and Agreement corporations in
offshore entities, whether those investments are subsidiaries, joint
ventures, or portfolio investments. The definitions of ``financial
institution'' and ``bank'' in the Bank Secrecy Act and regulations
thereunder do not encompass foreign offices or foreign investments of
U.S. banks or Edge and Agreement corporations.\4\ Nevertheless, banks
are expected to have policies, procedures, and processes in place at
all their branches and offices to protect against risks of money
laundering and terrorist financing. Moreover, an enterprise-wide anti-
money laundering compliance program that assesses risk on a
consolidated basis across all activities, business lines, and legal
entities may be an essential tool in managing such risks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(2); 31 CFR 103.11(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Regulatory Analysis
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
In accordance with section 4(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 604(a)), the Board must publish a final regulatory
flexibility analysis with this rulemaking. The final rule creates a
[[Page 13936]]
uniform regulatory standard for ensuring and examining compliance with
applicable law and regulation. Institutions covered by the rule,
whether small or large, are already required to have policies and
procedures substantially equivalent to those required by the rule.
Accordingly, the Board certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small business
entities.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3506; 5 CFR 1320 Appendix A.1), the Board has reviewed the final
rule under the authority delegated to the Board by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). The collections of information associated
with this rulemaking are found in 12 CFR 211.5 and 211.24. This
information is required to evidence compliance with the requirements of
the Bank Secrecy Act, and the regulations promulgated thereunder. The
recordkeepers are for-profit financial institutions.
The Federal Reserve may not conduct or sponsor, and an organization
is not required to respond to, this collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control number
is 7100-0310.
The final rule does not change the collection of information
requirements set forth in the proposed rule. The final rule applies
only to Edge and Agreement corporations and U.S. branches, agencies,
and representative offices of foreign banks supervised by the Board.
The final rule requires each of those entities to establish a written
compliance program that includes the following components: (i) A system
of internal controls to assure ongoing compliance; (ii) independent
testing of compliance by the institution's personnel or by an outside
party; (iii) the designation of an individual or individuals
responsible for coordinating and monitoring day-to-day compliance; and
(iv) training for appropriate personnel. The compliance program must be
approved by the board of directors (and noted in the minutes) or by a
delegee of the foreign bank's board of directors.
The commenters generally agreed that there would be little burden
associated with the requirements for establishing a compliance program
for the Bank Secrecy Act because the measures involved in the program
are consistent with existing requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act at
31 U.S.C. 5318(h) and usual and customary business practices. The Board
continues to believe that the estimated average annual burden of 16
hours per institution is accurate, because branches, agencies, and
representative offices of foreign banks and Edge and Agreement
corporations are currently subject to the program requirements of
section 5318(h) of the Bank Secrecy Act. Thus, the rule adopted today
clarifies the existing obligations of these entities under the Board's
rules. Because the records would be maintained at branches, agencies,
and representative offices of foreign banks and Edge and Agreement
corporations, and the records are not provided to the Federal Reserve,
no issue of confidentiality under the Freedom of Information Act
arises.
Estimated number of financial institutions subject to the final
rule: 520.
Estimated average annual burden for establishing the written
compliance program per financial institution: 16 hours (2 business
days).
Estimated total annual burden: 8,320 hours.
The Federal Reserve has a continuing interest in the public's
opinion of our collections of information. At any time, comments
regarding any aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing the burden may be sent to: Ms. Jennifer J.
Johnson, Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
20th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20551; and to
the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (OMB
No. 7100-0310), Washington, DC 20503.
IV. Use of Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Pub. L. 106-102,
requires the Board to use ``plain language'' in all proposed and final
rules published after January 1, 2000. The Board requested comment on
whether there were ways to make the proposed rule easier to understand.
One commenter suggested that the rule would be easier to use if it set
forth the full text of the regulatory requirements found in section
208.63. For the reasons discussed above, the Board has determined to
continue to incorporate by reference the text of the minimum
requirements for Bank Secrecy Act compliance programs found in section
208.63 of Regulation H. The Board believes that the final rule is
written plainly and presented clearly.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 211
Exports, Federal Reserve System, Foreign banking, Holding
companies, Investments, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, part 211 of chapter II of
title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 211--INTERNATIONAL BANKING OPERATIONS (REGULATION K)
0
1. The authority citation for 12 CFR part 211 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 221 et seq., 1818, 1835a, 1841 et seq.,
3101 et seq., and 3901 et seq.; 15 U.S.C. 6801 and 6805; 31 U.S.C.
5318.
0
2. In Sec. 211.5 add new paragraph (m)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 211.5 Edge and agreement corporations.
* * * * *
(m) Procedures for monitoring Bank Secrecy Act compliance.
(1) Establishment of Compliance Program. Each Edge corporation and
each agreement corporation shall, in accordance with the provisions of
Sec. 208.63 of the Board's Regulation H, 12 CFR 208.63, develop and
provide for the continued administration of a program reasonably
designed to assure and monitor compliance with the provisions of
subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code, the Bank
Secrecy Act, and the implementing regulations promulgated thereunder by
the Department of the Treasury at 31 CFR part 103. The compliance
program shall be reduced to writing, approved by the board of
directors, and noted in the minutes.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 211.24 add new paragraph (j)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 211.24 Approval of offices of foreign banks; procedures for
applications; standards for approval; representative office activities
and standards for approval; preservation of existing authority.
* * * * *
(j) Procedures for monitoring Bank Secrecy Act compliance.
(1) Establishment of Compliance Program. Except for a Federal
branch or a Federal agency or a state branch that is insured by the
FDIC, a branch, agency, or representative office of a foreign bank
operating in the United States shall, in accordance with the provisions
of Sec. 208.63 of the Board's Regulation H, 12 CFR 208.63, develop and
provide for the continued administration of a program reasonably
designed to assure and monitor compliance with the provisions of
subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code, the Bank
Secrecy Act, and the implementing regulations promulgated thereunder by
the
[[Page 13937]]
Department of the Treasury at 31 CFR part 103. The compliance program
shall be reduced to writing, and either:
(i) Approved by the foreign bank's board of directors and noted in
the minutes, or
(ii) Approved by a delegee acting under the express authority of
the board of directors to approve the Bank Secrecy Act compliance
program.
* * * * *
By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, March 15, 2006.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 06-2629 Filed 3-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P