WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding Turkey-Measures Affecting the Importation of Rice, 13666-13667 [E6-3783]
Download as PDF
13666
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 51 / Thursday, March 16, 2006 / Notices
new Assistant Secretary for Intelligence
and Research.
This delegation of authority shall be
published in the Federal Register.
Dated: March 9, 2006.
Condoleezza Rice,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–3834 Filed 3–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–10–P
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
[Docket No. WTO/DS–334]
WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding
Regarding Turkey—Measures
Affecting the Importation of Rice
Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Office of the United
States Trade Representative (USTR) is
providing notice that, in accordance
with the Marrakesh Agreement
Establishing the World Trade
Organization (‘‘WTO Agreement’’), the
United States has requested the
establishment of a panel regarding
Turkey’s import restrictions on rice
from the United States. That request
may be found at https://www.wto.org
contained in a document designated as
WT/DS334/4. USTR invites written
comments from the public concerning
the issues raised in this dispute.
DATES: Although USTR will accept any
comments received during the course of
the dispute, comments should be
submitted on or before May 17, 2006 to
be assured of timely consideration by
USTR.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
submitted (i) electronically, to
FR0604@ustr.gov, with ‘‘Turkey Rice
(DS334)’’ in the subject line, or (ii) by
fax, to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–
3640, with a confirmation copy sent
electronically to the electronic mail
address above, in accordance with the
requirements for submission set out
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Weiss, Assistant General Counsel, Office
of the United States Trade
Representative, 600 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC, (202) 395–4498.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to section 127(b) of the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act (URAA) (19 U.S.C.
3537(b)(1)), USTR is providing notice
that the United States has requested the
establishment of a WTO dispute
settlement panel pursuant to the WTO
Understanding on Rules and Procedures
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Mar 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
Governing the Settlement of Disputes
(‘‘DSU’’). Such panel, which would hold
its meetings in Geneva, Switzerland,
would be expected to issue a report on
its findings and recommendations
within six to nine months after it is
established.
Major Issues Raised by the United
States
Under its import regime for rice,
Turkey requires an import license to
import rice. Turkey operates tariff-rate
quotas for rice imports requiring that, in
order to import specified quantities of
rice at reduced tariff levels, importers
must purchase specified quantities of
domestic rice, including from the
Turkish Grain Board, Turkish
producers, or producer associations. In
addition, Turkey denies or fails to grant
licenses to import rice at or below the
bound rate of duty without domestic
purchase, including at the over-quota
rate of duty.
USTR believes these measures are
inconsistent with Turkey’s obligations
under:
1. Article 2.1 and paragraph 1(a) of
Annex 1 of the TRIMs Agreement
because Turkey imposes domestic
purchase requirements;
2. Article III:4 of the GATT 1994
because Turkey accords imported rice
less favorable treatment than domestic
rice through the imposition of domestic
purchase requirements ‘‘affecting [its]
internal sale, offering for sale, purchase,
transportation, distribution, or use’’;
3. Article XI:1 of the GATT 1994
because Turkey’s (1) denial of, or failure
to grant, import licenses for rice at or
below the bound rate of duty, and (2)
the domestic purchase requirements,
both on their own and in conjunction,
constitute a prohibition or restriction on
imports other than in the form of duties,
taxes, or other charges; and
4. Article 4.2 of the Agriculture
Agreement because Turkey’s (1) denial
of, or failure to grant, import licenses for
rice at or below the bound rate of duty,
and (2) the domestic purchase
requirements, both on their own and in
conjunction, are ‘‘measures of the kind
which have been required to be
converted into ordinary customs
duties,’’ such as quantitative import
restrictions, discretionary import
licensing, and non-tariff measures
maintained through a state-trading
enterprise, which Members may not
resort to or maintain under that
Agreement.
USTR also considers that these
measures are inconsistent with Turkey’s
obligations under: Articles X:1, X:2, and
X:3 of the GATT 1994 and Articles 1.2,
1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 3.2, 3.3, 3.5(a), 3.5(b),
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3.5(d), 3.5(e), 3.5(f), 3.5(g), 3.5(h), 5.1,
5.2, 5.3, and 5.4 of the Import Licensing
Agreement.
Public Comment: Requirements for
Submissions
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments concerning
the issues raised in the dispute.
Comments should be submitted (i)
electronically, to FR0604@ustr.gov, with
‘‘Turkey Rice (DS334)’’ in the subject
line, or (ii) by fax, to Sandy McKinzy at
(202) 395–3640, with a confirmation
copy sent electronically to the electronic
mail address above.
USTR encourages the submission of
documents in Adobe PDF format as
attachments to an electronic mail.
Interested persons who make
submissions by electronic mail should
not provide separate cover letters;
information that might appear in a cover
letter should be included in the
submission itself. Similarly, to the
extent possible, any attachments to the
submission should be included in the
same file as the submission itself, and
not as separate files.
Comments must be in English. A
person requesting that information
contained in a comment submitted by
that person be treated as confidential
business information must certify that
such information is business
confidential and would not customarily
be released to the public by the
commenter. Confidential business
information must be clearly designated
as such and ‘‘BUSINESS
CONFIDENTIAL’’ must be marked at the
top and bottom of the cover page and
each succeeding page.
Information or advice contained in a
comment submitted, other than business
confidential information, may be
determined by USTR to be confidential
in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of
the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that
information or advice may qualify as
such, the submitter—
(1) Must clearly so designate the
information or advice;
(2) Must clearly mark the material as
‘‘SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE’’ at the
top and bottom of the cover page and
each succeeding page; and
(3) Is encouraged to provide a nonconfidential summary of the
information or advice.
Pursuant to section 127(e) of the
URAA (19 U.S.C. 3537(e)), USTR will
maintain a file on this dispute
settlement proceeding, accessible to the
public, in the USTR Reading Room,
which is located at 1724 F Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20508. The public file
will include non-confidential comments
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 51 / Thursday, March 16, 2006 / Notices
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
received by USTR from the public with
respect to the dispute; if a dispute
settlement panel is convened or in the
event of an appeal from such a panel,
the U.S. submissions, the submissions,
or non-confidential summaries of
submissions, received from other
participants in the dispute; the report of
the panel and; if applicable, the report
of the Appellate Body. An appointment
to review the public file (Docket WTO/
DS–334, Turkey Rice Dispute) may be
made by calling the USTR Reading
Room at (202) 395–6186.
The USTR Reading Room is open to
the public from 9:30 a.m. to noon and
1 p.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
NW., Washington, DC 20508, (202) 395–
3582.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If a
dispute settlement panel is established,
such panel, which would hold its
meetings in Geneva, Switzerland, would
be expected to issue a report on its
findings and recommendations within
90 days after referral of the matter to it.
Major Issues Raised by Argentina
In its panel request, Argentina alleges
that the United States had not fully
complied with the recommendations
and rulings of the Dispute Settlement
Body from the original dispute. Those
recommendations and rulings stem from
the panel and Appellate Body reports
which may be found at https://
Daniel Brinza,
www.wto.org designated as WT/DS268/
Assistant United States Trade Representative
R and WT/DS268/AB/R, respectively.
for Monitoring and Enforcement.
In particular, Argentina contends that
[FR Doc. E6–3783 Filed 3–15–06; 8:45 am]
the U.S. Department of Commerce erred
BILLING CODE 3190–W6–P
by developing new factual information
and that the reasoning in the
redetermination made pursuant to
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
section 129 of the Uruguay Round
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Agreements Act is not consistent with
Articles 11.1, 11.3, and 11.4 of the
WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding
Antidumping Agreement. Argentina
Regarding Sunset Reviews of Antialso considers that the redetermination
Dumping Measures on Oil Country
was inconsistent with a number of
Tubular Goods From Argentina
procedural obligations in the
Antidumping Agreement, including
AGENCY: Office of the United States
Articles 6.1, 6.2, 6.4, 6.5.1, 6.6, 6.8, 6.9,
Trade Representative.
12.2, and Annex II. Argentina also
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
alleges that USTR was required to direct
SUMMARY: The Office of the United
Commerce to implement the
States Trade Representative (‘‘USTR’’) is redetermination in order to avoid a
providing notice that Argentina has
breach of Article 13 of the Antidumping
requested the establishment of a dispute Agreement. Argentina further contends
settlement panel under the Marrakesh
that Commerce was required to amend
Agreement Establishing the World Trade or repeal the statute and that the
Organization (‘‘WTO Agreement’’). That amended regulation is inconsistent with
request may be found at https://
the obligation to arrive at a reasoned
www.wto.org contained in a document
conclusion on the basis of positive
designated as WT/DS268/16. USTR
evidence, as well as Articles 6.1, 6.2,
invites written comments from the
6.6, 11.1, and 11.3 of the Antidumping
public concerning the issues raised in
Agreement.
this dispute.
Public Comment: Requirements for
DATES: Although USTR will accept any
Submissions
comments received during the course of
Interested persons are invited to
the dispute, comments should be
submit written comments concerning
submitted on or before May 19, 2006, to
the issues raised in this dispute. Persons
be assured of timely consideration by
submitting comments may either send
USTR.
one copy by fax to Sandy McKinzy at
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
(202) 395–3640, or transmit a copy
submitted (i) electronically, to
electronically to FR0609@ustr.gov.eop,
FR0609@ustr.gov.eop, Attn: ‘‘Argentina
with ‘‘Argentina OCTG’’ in the subject
OCTG’’ in the subject line, or (ii) by fax, line. For documents sent by fax, USTR
to Sandy McKinzy at 202–395–3640,
requests that the submitter provide a
with a confirmation copy sent
confirmation copy to the electronic mail
electronically to the e-mail address
address listed above.
above.
USTR encourages the submission of
documents in Adobe PDF format, as
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
attachments to an electronic mail.
Elizabeth V. Baltzan, Associate General
Interested persons who make
Counsel, Office of the United States
submissions by electronic mail should
Trade Representative, 600 17th Street,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Mar 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13667
not provide separate cover letters;
information that might appear in a cover
letter should be included in the
submission itself. Similarly, to the
extent possible, any attachments to the
submission should be included in the
same file as the submission itself, and
not as separate files.
A person requesting that information
contained in a comment submitted by
that person be treated as confidential
business information must certify that
such information is business
confidential and would not customarily
be released to the public by the
submitter. Confidential business
information must be clearly designated
as such and the submission must be
marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’
at the top and bottom of the cover page
and each succeeding page of the
submission.
Information or advice contained in a
comment submitted, other than business
confidential information, may be
determined by USTR to be confidential
in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of
the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
2155(g)(2)). If the submitting person
believes that information or advice may
qualify as such, the submitting person—
(1) Must clearly so designate the
information or advice;
(2) Must clearly mark the material as
‘‘SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE’’ at the
top and bottom of each page of the cover
page and each succeeding page; and
(3) Is encouraged to provide a nonconfidential summary of the
information or advice.
Pursuant to section 127(e) of the
URAA (19 U.S.C. 3537(e)), USTR will
maintain a file on this dispute
settlement proceeding, accessible to the
public, in the USTR Reading Room,
which is located at 1724 F Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20508. The public file
will include non-confidential comments
received by USTR from the public with
respect to the dispute; if a dispute
settlement panel is convened or in the
event of an appeal from such a panel,
the U.S. submissions, the submissions,
or non-confidential summaries of
submissions, received from other
participants in the dispute; the report of
the panel and; if applicable, the report
of the Appellate Body. An appointment
to review the public file (Docket No.
WT/DS–268, Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Measures on Oil Country
Tubular Goods from Argentina) may be
made by calling the USTR Reading
Room at (202) 395–6186. The USTR
Reading Room is open to the public
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 51 (Thursday, March 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13666-13667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-3783]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
[Docket No. WTO/DS-334]
WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding Turkey--Measures
Affecting the Importation of Rice
AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is
providing notice that, in accordance with the Marrakesh Agreement
Establishing the World Trade Organization (``WTO Agreement''), the
United States has requested the establishment of a panel regarding
Turkey's import restrictions on rice from the United States. That
request may be found at https://www.wto.org contained in a document
designated as WT/DS334/4. USTR invites written comments from the public
concerning the issues raised in this dispute.
DATES: Although USTR will accept any comments received during the
course of the dispute, comments should be submitted on or before May
17, 2006 to be assured of timely consideration by USTR.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted (i) electronically, to
FR0604@ustr.gov, with ``Turkey Rice (DS334)'' in the subject line, or
(ii) by fax, to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-3640, with a confirmation
copy sent electronically to the electronic mail address above, in
accordance with the requirements for submission set out below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Weiss, Assistant General Counsel,
Office of the United States Trade Representative, 600 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC, (202) 395-4498.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 127(b) of the Uruguay
Round Agreements Act (URAA) (19 U.S.C. 3537(b)(1)), USTR is providing
notice that the United States has requested the establishment of a WTO
dispute settlement panel pursuant to the WTO Understanding on Rules and
Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (``DSU''). Such panel,
which would hold its meetings in Geneva, Switzerland, would be expected
to issue a report on its findings and recommendations within six to
nine months after it is established.
Major Issues Raised by the United States
Under its import regime for rice, Turkey requires an import license
to import rice. Turkey operates tariff-rate quotas for rice imports
requiring that, in order to import specified quantities of rice at
reduced tariff levels, importers must purchase specified quantities of
domestic rice, including from the Turkish Grain Board, Turkish
producers, or producer associations. In addition, Turkey denies or
fails to grant licenses to import rice at or below the bound rate of
duty without domestic purchase, including at the over-quota rate of
duty.
USTR believes these measures are inconsistent with Turkey's
obligations under:
1. Article 2.1 and paragraph 1(a) of Annex 1 of the TRIMs Agreement
because Turkey imposes domestic purchase requirements;
2. Article III:4 of the GATT 1994 because Turkey accords imported
rice less favorable treatment than domestic rice through the imposition
of domestic purchase requirements ``affecting [its] internal sale,
offering for sale, purchase, transportation, distribution, or use'';
3. Article XI:1 of the GATT 1994 because Turkey's (1) denial of, or
failure to grant, import licenses for rice at or below the bound rate
of duty, and (2) the domestic purchase requirements, both on their own
and in conjunction, constitute a prohibition or restriction on imports
other than in the form of duties, taxes, or other charges; and
4. Article 4.2 of the Agriculture Agreement because Turkey's (1)
denial of, or failure to grant, import licenses for rice at or below
the bound rate of duty, and (2) the domestic purchase requirements,
both on their own and in conjunction, are ``measures of the kind which
have been required to be converted into ordinary customs duties,'' such
as quantitative import restrictions, discretionary import licensing,
and non-tariff measures maintained through a state-trading enterprise,
which Members may not resort to or maintain under that Agreement.
USTR also considers that these measures are inconsistent with
Turkey's obligations under: Articles X:1, X:2, and X:3 of the GATT 1994
and Articles 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 3.2, 3.3, 3.5(a), 3.5(b), 3.5(d),
3.5(e), 3.5(f), 3.5(g), 3.5(h), 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4 of the Import
Licensing Agreement.
Public Comment: Requirements for Submissions
Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning the issues raised in the dispute. Comments should be
submitted (i) electronically, to FR0604@ustr.gov, with ``Turkey Rice
(DS334)'' in the subject line, or (ii) by fax, to Sandy McKinzy at
(202) 395-3640, with a confirmation copy sent electronically to the
electronic mail address above.
USTR encourages the submission of documents in Adobe PDF format as
attachments to an electronic mail. Interested persons who make
submissions by electronic mail should not provide separate cover
letters; information that might appear in a cover letter should be
included in the submission itself. Similarly, to the extent possible,
any attachments to the submission should be included in the same file
as the submission itself, and not as separate files.
Comments must be in English. A person requesting that information
contained in a comment submitted by that person be treated as
confidential business information must certify that such information is
business confidential and would not customarily be released to the
public by the commenter. Confidential business information must be
clearly designated as such and ``BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL'' must be marked
at the top and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page.
Information or advice contained in a comment submitted, other than
business confidential information, may be determined by USTR to be
confidential in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of the Trade Act of
1974 (19 U.S.C. 2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that information
or advice may qualify as such, the submitter--
(1) Must clearly so designate the information or advice;
(2) Must clearly mark the material as ``SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE''
at the top and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page; and
(3) Is encouraged to provide a non-confidential summary of the
information or advice.
Pursuant to section 127(e) of the URAA (19 U.S.C. 3537(e)), USTR
will maintain a file on this dispute settlement proceeding, accessible
to the public, in the USTR Reading Room, which is located at 1724 F
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20508. The public file will include non-
confidential comments
[[Page 13667]]
received by USTR from the public with respect to the dispute; if a
dispute settlement panel is convened or in the event of an appeal from
such a panel, the U.S. submissions, the submissions, or non-
confidential summaries of submissions, received from other participants
in the dispute; the report of the panel and; if applicable, the report
of the Appellate Body. An appointment to review the public file (Docket
WTO/DS-334, Turkey Rice Dispute) may be made by calling the USTR
Reading Room at (202) 395-6186.
The USTR Reading Room is open to the public from 9:30 a.m. to noon
and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Daniel Brinza,
Assistant United States Trade Representative for Monitoring and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E6-3783 Filed 3-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-W6-P