Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; PRIALT, 13409-13410 [E6-3712]

Download as PDF sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 15, 2006 / Notices phase of the regulatory review period, while 1,522 days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the following dates: 1. The date an exemption under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355) became effective: March 31, 1995. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that the date the investigational new drug application became effective was on March 31, 1995. 2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to the human drug product under section 505 of the act: October 27, 1998. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that the new drug application (NDA) for RELPAX (NDA 21–016) was initially submitted on October 27, 1998. 3. The date the application was approved: December 26, 2002. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that NDA 21–016 was approved on December 26, 2002. This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,230 days of patent term extension. Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination by May 15, 2006. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period by September 11, 2006. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30. Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:27 Mar 14, 2006 Jkt 208001 Dated: February 13, 2006. Jane A. Axelrad, Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. [FR Doc. E6–3711 Filed 3–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket Nos. 2005E–0239 and 2005E–0246] Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; PRIALT AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the regulatory review period for PRIALT and is publishing this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination because of the submission of two applications to the Director of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of two patents which claims that human drug product. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to https:// www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Claudia V. Grillo, Office of Regulatory Policy (HFD–013), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 240–453–6681. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670) generally provide that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product’s regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension an applicant may receive. A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the approval PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 13409 phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial submission of an application to market the human drug product and continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product. Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be subtracted, as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA’s determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B). FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product PRIALT (ziconotide). PRIALT is indicated for the management of severe chronic pain in patients for whom intrathecal (IT) therapy is warranted, and who are intolerant or refractory to other treatment, such as systemic analgesics, adjunctive therapies, or IT morphine. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received two patent term restoration applications for PRIALT (U.S. Patent Nos. 5,795,864 and 5,364,842) from Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA’s assistance in determining these patents’ eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated July 8, 2005, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of PRIALT represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product’s regulatory review period. FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for PRIALT is 3,801 days. Of this time, 1,973 days occurred during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 1,828 days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the following dates: 1. The date an exemption under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355) became effective: August 4, 1994. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that the date the investigational new drug application became effective was on August 4, 1994. 2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to the human drug product under section 505 of the act: December 28, 1999. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that the new drug application (NDA) for PRIALT E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM 15MRN1 13410 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 15, 2006 / Notices (NDA 21–060) was initially submitted on December 28, 1999. 3. The date the application was approved: December 28, 2004. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that NDA 21–060 was approved on December 28, 2004. This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its applications for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,228 days (U.S. Patent No. 5,795,864) and 5 years (U.S. Patent No. 5,364,842) of patent term extension. Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination by May 15, 2006. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period by September 11, 2006. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30. Comments and petitions are to be submitted to the Division of Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Dated: February 13, 2006. Jane A. Axelrad, Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. [FR Doc. E6–3712 Filed 3–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Food and Drug Administration Science Board to the Food and Drug Administration; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:27 Mar 14, 2006 Jkt 208001 This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will be open to the public. Name of Committee: Science Board to the Food and Drug Administration Science Board (Science Board). General Function of the Committee: The Science Board provides advice primarily to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and other appropriate officials on specific complex and technical issues as well as emerging issues within the scientific community in industry and academia. Additionally, the Science Board provides advice to the agency on keeping pace with technical and scientific evolutions in the fields of regulatory science, on formulating an appropriate research agenda, and on upgrading it’s scientific and research facilities to keep pace with these changes. It will also provide the means for critical review of agency sponsored intramural and extramural scientific research programs. Date and Time: The meeting will be held on March 31, 2006, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. Location: Food and Drug Administration, rm. 1066, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. Contact Person: Jan Johannessen, Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration (HF–33), 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–6687, Jan.Johannessen@fda.hhs.gov, or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1–800–741–8138 (301–443–0572 in the Washington, DC area), code 3014512603. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date information on this meeting. Agenda: The Science Board will conclude their discussion on drug safety from the meeting of November 4, 2005, and will hear about and discuss a request by the agency for a review of the agency’s science programs. The Science Board will then hear about and discuss the agency’s response to the recommendations contained in the Science Board’s peer review of the Office of Regulatory Affairs Pesticide Program, plans for a Science Board peer review of the Center for Veterinary Medicine’s intramural portion of the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, and the science priorities of the agency’s Office of Women’s Health. Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. Written submissions may be made to the contact person by March 24, 2006. Oral PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 presentations from the public will be scheduled between approximately 1 p.m. and 2 p.m. Time allotted for each presentation may be limited. Those desiring to make formal oral presentations should notify the contact person before March 24, 2006, and submit a brief statement of the general nature of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed participants, and an indication of the approximate time requested to make their presentation. Persons attending FDA’s advisory committee meetings are advised that the agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical outlets. FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special accommodations due to a disability, please contact Jan Johannessen (see Contact Person) at least 7 days in advance of the meeting. Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2). Dated: March 7, 2006. Jason Brodsky, Acting Associate Commissioner for External Relations. [FR Doc. E6–3639 Filed 3–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. 2005D–0004] Guidance for Industry on Nonclinical Safety Evaluation of Drug or Biologic Combinations; Availability AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry entitled ‘‘Nonclinical Safety Evaluation of Drug or Biologic Combinations.’’ This guidance provides recommendations on nonclinical approaches to support the clinical study and approval of fixeddose combination products (FDCs), copackaged products, and some adjunctive therapies. DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on agency guidances at any time. Submit written requests for single copies of this guidance to the Division of Drug Information (HFD– ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM 15MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13409-13410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-3712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket Nos. 2005E-0239 and 2005E-0246]


Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent 
Extension; PRIALT

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the 
regulatory review period for PRIALT and is publishing this notice of 
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination 
because of the submission of two applications to the Director of 
Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of 
two patents which claims that human drug product.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of 
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments 
to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Claudia V. Grillo, Office of 
Regulatory Policy (HFD-013), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers 
Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 240-453-6681.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term 
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug 
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide 
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as 
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical 
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory 
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a 
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the 
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
    A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A 
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the 
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical 
investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the 
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial 
submission of an application to market the human drug product and 
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product. 
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward 
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and 
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be 
subtracted, as well as any time that may have occurred before the 
patent was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory 
review period for a human drug product will include all of the testing 
phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
    FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product PRIALT 
(ziconotide). PRIALT is indicated for the management of severe chronic 
pain in patients for whom intrathecal (IT) therapy is warranted, and 
who are intolerant or refractory to other treatment, such as systemic 
analgesics, adjunctive therapies, or IT morphine. Subsequent to this 
approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received two patent term 
restoration applications for PRIALT (U.S. Patent Nos. 5,795,864 and 
5,364,842) from Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and the Patent and 
Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining these 
patents' eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated 
July 8, 2005, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this 
human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and that 
the approval of PRIALT represented the first permitted commercial 
marketing or use of the product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and 
Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory 
review period.
    FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for 
PRIALT is 3,801 days. Of this time, 1,973 days occurred during the 
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 1,828 days 
occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived 
from the following dates:
    1. The date an exemption under section 505 of the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355) became effective: 
August 4, 1994. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the date 
the investigational new drug application became effective was on August 
4, 1994.
    2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to 
the human drug product under section 505 of the act: December 28, 1999. 
FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the new drug application 
(NDA) for PRIALT

[[Page 13410]]

(NDA 21-060) was initially submitted on December 28, 1999.
    3. The date the application was approved: December 28, 2004. FDA 
has verified the applicant's claim that NDA 21-060 was approved on 
December 28, 2004.
    This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the 
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S. 
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in 
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its 
applications for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,228 days 
(U.S. Patent No. 5,795,864) and 5 years (U.S. Patent No. 5,364,842) of 
patent term extension.
    Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are 
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see 
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination 
by May 15, 2006. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA 
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted 
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by September 11, 
2006. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to 
merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d 
sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 
21 CFR 10.30.
    Comments and petitions are to be submitted to the Division of 
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be 
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to 
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading 
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of 
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

    Dated: February 13, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E6-3712 Filed 3-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.