Environmental Impact Statement for the Denton County, TX, Transportation Authority Commuter Rail Project, 12420-12421 [06-2337]
Download as PDF
12420
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 47 / Friday, March 10, 2006 / Notices
Paulson, in writing or by fax, in order
to be put on the agenda. Annette
Paulson, Acting Public Information
Officer, SBA, North Florida District
Office, 7825 Baymeadows Way, Suite
100B, Jacksonville, FL 32256–7504,
phone (904) 443–1914, fax (904) 443–
1380, e-mail: Annette.paulson@sba.gov.
For more information, see our Web
site at https://www.sba.gov/ombudsman.
information may be found at https://
exchanges.state.gov/culprop.
The meeting on March 23–24 will be
closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552b(c)(9)(B) and 19 U.S.C. 2605(h).
Matthew K. Becker,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–3397 Filed 3–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Dated: March 2, 2006.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–3461 Filed 3–9–06; 8:45 am]
Federal Transit Administration
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Denton County, TX, Transportation
Authority Commuter Rail Project
Notice of Meeting of the Cultural
Property Advisory Committee
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
[Public Notice 5325]
AGENCY:
In accordance with the provisions of
the Convention on Cultural Property
Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2601 et
seq.) (the Act) there will be a meeting of
the Cultural Property Advisory
Committee on Thursday, March 23,
2006, from approximately 9 a.m. to 5
p.m., and on Friday, March 24, from
approximately 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., at the
Department of State, Annex 44, Room
840, 301 4th St., SW., Washington, DC.
At this meeting the Committee will
conduct its ongoing review function
with respect to the Memorandum of
Understanding Between the
Government of the United States of
America and the Government of the
Republic of Peru Concerning the
Imposition of Import Restrictions on
Archaeological Material from the PreHispanic Cultures and Certain
Ethnological Material from the Colonial
Period; and, with respect to the
Memorandum of Understanding with
the Government of the Republic of
Cyprus Concerning the Imposition of
Import Restrictions on Pre-Classical and
Classical Archaeological Objects. This
meeting is for the Committee to satisfy
its ongoing review responsibility of the
effectiveness of agreements pursuant to
the Act and will focus its attention on
Article II of the MOUs. This is not a
meeting to consider extension of the
MOUs. Such a meeting or meetings will
be scheduled at some time in the future
at which time a public session will be
held.
The Committee’s responsibilities are
carried out in accordance with
provisions of the Convention on
Cultural Property Implementation Act
(19 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.). The U.S.—Peru
MOU, the U.S.—Cyprus MOU, the
designated lists of restricted categories,
the text of the Act, and related
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:31 Mar 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
Federal Transit Administration,
DOT.
Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) and the Denton
County Transportation Authority
(DCTA) issue this notice to advise
interested agencies and the public of
their intent to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) in accordance
with the regulations implementing the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) for transportation improvements
in Denton and Dallas Counties, Texas.
Transit improvements will be
considered generally between Denton
and Carrollton along the former
Missouri Kansas Texas (MKT) Railroad
line that parallels I–35E, as
recommended by the DCTA Board of
Directors in May 2005 following a study
of the transportation needs in the
corridor and an analysis of alternative
solutions. The relationships of
concurrent projects such as the I–35E
Environmental Analysis (EA) being
conducted by the Texas Department of
Transportation (TxDOT), the Northwest
Corridor Light Rail Transit project being
advanced by the Dallas Area Rapid
Transit (DART), and others, will also be
considered in the EIS process.
Transportation improvements are
needed to meet current and future travel
demands and to upgrade the
transportation facilities in the corridor.
The EIS will evaluate the recommended
regional rail alignment, the No-Build
Alternative, a Transportation Systems
Management (TSM) alternative, and any
additional reasonable alternatives that
emerge from scoping.
DATES: Comment Due Date: Written or
electronic comments on the scope of the
EIS, including the purpose and need for
transportation action in the corridor,
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and alternatives and impacts to be
considered, should be sent to the project
team’s public involvement coordinator
(see ADDRESSES below) by March 31,
2006. Scoping Meetings: Public scoping
meetings will be held on February 28,
2006, in Denton, TX, and March
2,20076, in Lewisville, TX, from 6 p.m.
to 8 p.m. at the locations shown in
ADDRESSES below.
ADDRESSES: Written or electronic
comments on the EIS scope should be
sent to: Judy Meyer, Public Involvement
Lead, c/o Public Information Associates,
P.O. Box 570, Allen, Texas 75013;
Phone: 888–724–5328; Fax: 214–495–
0479; E-mail: Judy.Meyer@dfwair.net.
Scoping meetings will be held at the
following locations:
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
6–8 p.m., Martin Luther King
Recreation Center, 1300 Wilson St.,
Denton, TX 76205.
Thursday, March 2, 2006
6–8 p.m., Lewisville Senior Center, 1950
S. Valley Parkway, Lewisville, TX
75067.
Information on the time and place of
the public scoping meetings will be
provided in the local newspapers and
other media outlets. The scoping
information packet is available on the
Internet at https://www.RailDCTA.net.
The packet is also available in hardcopy
form by contacting Judy Meyer as
indicated above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Sweek, Community Planner, Federal
Transit Administration, Region VI; (817)
978–0550.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Scoping of the EIS
The FTA, in cooperation with the
DCTA, will prepare an EIS for
transportation improvements along the
MKT Railroad line that parallels I–35E
between Denton and Carrollton.
Interested individuals, organizations,
businesses and Federal, state and local
agencies are invited to participate in
determining the scope of the EIS,
including the purpose and need for
transportation action in the corridor,
alternative alignments, alternative
station locations, impacts to be evaluate,
and environmental or community
resources to be protected. Specific
suggestions on additional alternatives to
be examined and issues to be addressed
are welcome and will be considered in
the development in the final study
scope. Scoping comments may be made
orally or in writing not later than March
31, 2006. See DATES and ADDRESSES
above. Additional information on the
EIS process, the purpose and need,
alternatives, and anticipated impact
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 47 / Friday, March 10, 2006 / Notices
issues are available from DCTA. See
DATES and ADDRESSES above.
The EIS will evaluate transit
improvement alternatives, the NoAction alternative, and a Transportation
System Management (TSM) alternative
based on the Purpose and Need
statement developed for the corridor
during the previous Alternatives
Analysis (AA). The AA document is
available for public review on the
Internet at https://www.RailDCTA.net or
by contacting the project office at the
address in ADDRESSES above. The AA
document will also be available for
review at the public scoping meetings.
Alternatives will be reviewed and
analyzed through an extensive agency
and community outreach process. The
EIS evaluation will result in a decision
about which transportation projects, if
any, will be built to address the states
purpose and need for transportation
action in the corridor.
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
II. Description of Study Area and
Project Need
The study area for the EIS evaluation
is the travelshed that parallels I–35E
between Denton and Carrollton. The
purpose of the proposed action is to
decrease congestion, and improve
safety, access, and mobility. More
details are available in the scoping
information packet. See ADDRESSES
above.
III. Alternatives To Be Considered
The alternatives evaluated in the EIS
will include, but not limited to, the
recommended Locally Preferred
Alternative (LPA) developed in the AA,
and approved by the DCTA Board of
Directors in May 2005. This alternative
consisted of Regional Rail (also called
Commuter Rail) on the MKT alignment.
Feeder bus improvements also were
included as part of the recommended
LPA. In addition, an existing bicycle/
hiking trail on the northern portion of
the corridor would be relocated within
the railroad right-of-way as a ‘rails-withtrails’ facility. Five stations were
proposed on the alignment during the
AA: downtown Denton; south Denton;
north Lewisville; downtown Lewisville;
and south Lewisville; with a connection
to the DART light rail station at Belt
Line in Carrollton.
The EIS will again examine other
reasonable alternatives emerge from
scoping. These may include alternatives
that were screened out during the AA
but that may now be available due to
recent demographic trends, anticipated
funding levels, or technological
advances. The EIS will also evaluate the
appropriate end-of-line and associated
facilities and connections into the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:31 Mar 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
DART system in Carrollton and in
downtown Denton. As part of the transit
evaluation, station locations, railyard
facilities, and other ancillary facilities
such as stormwater management
systems will be studied and identified
as appropriate.
The EIS will also fully evaluate the
No-Action Alternative and a TSM
alternative. Other alternatives may be
added as a result of scoping and agency
coordination efforts.
IV. Probable Effects/Potential Impacts
for Analysis
The EIS evaluation will analyze
social, economic, and environmental
impacts of the alternatives. Major issues
to be evaluated include air quality,
noise and vibration, aesthetics,
community cohesion impacts, and
possible disruption of neighborhoods,
businesses and commercial activities.
The impact areas and level of detail
addressed in the EIS will be consistent
with the requirements of SAFETEA–LU
Section 6002 and the FTA/Federal
Highway Administration environmental
regulation (Environmental Impact and
Related Procedures, 23 CFR part 771
and 40 CFR parts 1500–1508) and other
environmental and related regulations.
Among other factors, the EIS will
evaluate:
• Transportation service including
future corridor capacity;
• Transit ridership and costs;
• Traffic movements and changes and
associated impacts to local facilities;
• Community impacts such as land
use, displacements, noise and vibration,
neighborhood compatibility and
aesthetics; and
• Resource impacts including impacts
to historic and archaeological resources,
parklands, cultural resource impacts,
environmental justice, and natural
resource impacts including air quality,
wetlands, water quality, and wildlife.
The proposed impact assessment and
evaluation will take into account both
positive and negative impacts, direct
and indirect impacts, short-term (during
the construction period) and long-terms
impacts, and site-specific as well as
corridor-wide impacts. Mitigation
measures will be identified for any
adverse environmental impacts that are
identified.
Other potential impacts may be added
as a result of scoping and agency
coordination efforts.
Issued on: March 7, 2006.
Robert C. Patrick,
Regional Administrator, Federal Transit
Administration, Fort Worth, Texas.
[FR Doc. 06–2337 Filed 3–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–M
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12421
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2005–21845; Notice 2]
Decision That Nonconforming 2005
Mercedes Benz Type 463 Short
Wheelbase Gelaendewagen
Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles Are
Eligible for Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of decision by National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration
that nonconforming 2005 Mercedes
Benz Type 463 short wheelbase
Gelaendewagen multipurpose passenger
vehicles are eligible for importation.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document announces a
decision by the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
that certain 2005 Mercedes Benz Type
463 short wheelbase Gelaendewagen
multipurpose passenger vehicles that
were not originally manufactured to
comply with all applicable Federal
motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS)
are eligible for importation into the
United States because they have safety
features that comply with, or are
capable of being altered to comply with,
all applicable FMVSS.
DATES: This decision was effective
September 23, 2005. The agency
notified the petitioner at that time that
the petition had been granted. This
document provides public notice of that
decision.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–3151).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
NHTSA has decided that the motor
vehicle is substantially similar to a
motor vehicle originally manufactured
for importation into and sale in the
United States, certified under 49 U.S.C.
30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be
compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS.
Where there is no substantially
similar U.S.-certified motor vehicle, 49
U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) permits a
nonconforming motor vehicle to be
admitted into the United States if its
safety features comply with, or are
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12420-12421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-2337]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Environmental Impact Statement for the Denton County, TX,
Transportation Authority Commuter Rail Project
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Denton County
Transportation Authority (DCTA) issue this notice to advise interested
agencies and the public of their intent to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) in accordance with the regulations implementing
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for transportation
improvements in Denton and Dallas Counties, Texas. Transit improvements
will be considered generally between Denton and Carrollton along the
former Missouri Kansas Texas (MKT) Railroad line that parallels I-35E,
as recommended by the DCTA Board of Directors in May 2005 following a
study of the transportation needs in the corridor and an analysis of
alternative solutions. The relationships of concurrent projects such as
the I-35E Environmental Analysis (EA) being conducted by the Texas
Department of Transportation (TxDOT), the Northwest Corridor Light Rail
Transit project being advanced by the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART),
and others, will also be considered in the EIS process.
Transportation improvements are needed to meet current and future
travel demands and to upgrade the transportation facilities in the
corridor. The EIS will evaluate the recommended regional rail
alignment, the No-Build Alternative, a Transportation Systems
Management (TSM) alternative, and any additional reasonable
alternatives that emerge from scoping.
DATES: Comment Due Date: Written or electronic comments on the scope of
the EIS, including the purpose and need for transportation action in
the corridor, and alternatives and impacts to be considered, should be
sent to the project team's public involvement coordinator (see
ADDRESSES below) by March 31, 2006. Scoping Meetings: Public scoping
meetings will be held on February 28, 2006, in Denton, TX, and March
2,20076, in Lewisville, TX, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. at the locations
shown in ADDRESSES below.
ADDRESSES: Written or electronic comments on the EIS scope should be
sent to: Judy Meyer, Public Involvement Lead, c/o Public Information
Associates, P.O. Box 570, Allen, Texas 75013; Phone: 888-724-5328; Fax:
214-495-0479; E-mail: Judy.Meyer@dfwair.net.
Scoping meetings will be held at the following locations:
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
6-8 p.m., Martin Luther King Recreation Center, 1300 Wilson St.,
Denton, TX 76205.
Thursday, March 2, 2006
6-8 p.m., Lewisville Senior Center, 1950 S. Valley Parkway, Lewisville,
TX 75067.
Information on the time and place of the public scoping meetings
will be provided in the local newspapers and other media outlets. The
scoping information packet is available on the Internet at https://
www.RailDCTA.net. The packet is also available in hardcopy form by
contacting Judy Meyer as indicated above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Sweek, Community Planner, Federal
Transit Administration, Region VI; (817) 978-0550.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Scoping of the EIS
The FTA, in cooperation with the DCTA, will prepare an EIS for
transportation improvements along the MKT Railroad line that parallels
I-35E between Denton and Carrollton. Interested individuals,
organizations, businesses and Federal, state and local agencies are
invited to participate in determining the scope of the EIS, including
the purpose and need for transportation action in the corridor,
alternative alignments, alternative station locations, impacts to be
evaluate, and environmental or community resources to be protected.
Specific suggestions on additional alternatives to be examined and
issues to be addressed are welcome and will be considered in the
development in the final study scope. Scoping comments may be made
orally or in writing not later than March 31, 2006. See DATES and
ADDRESSES above. Additional information on the EIS process, the purpose
and need, alternatives, and anticipated impact
[[Page 12421]]
issues are available from DCTA. See DATES and ADDRESSES above.
The EIS will evaluate transit improvement alternatives, the No-
Action alternative, and a Transportation System Management (TSM)
alternative based on the Purpose and Need statement developed for the
corridor during the previous Alternatives Analysis (AA). The AA
document is available for public review on the Internet at https://
www.RailDCTA.net or by contacting the project office at the address in
ADDRESSES above. The AA document will also be available for review at
the public scoping meetings. Alternatives will be reviewed and analyzed
through an extensive agency and community outreach process. The EIS
evaluation will result in a decision about which transportation
projects, if any, will be built to address the states purpose and need
for transportation action in the corridor.
II. Description of Study Area and Project Need
The study area for the EIS evaluation is the travelshed that
parallels I-35E between Denton and Carrollton. The purpose of the
proposed action is to decrease congestion, and improve safety, access,
and mobility. More details are available in the scoping information
packet. See ADDRESSES above.
III. Alternatives To Be Considered
The alternatives evaluated in the EIS will include, but not limited
to, the recommended Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) developed in
the AA, and approved by the DCTA Board of Directors in May 2005. This
alternative consisted of Regional Rail (also called Commuter Rail) on
the MKT alignment. Feeder bus improvements also were included as part
of the recommended LPA. In addition, an existing bicycle/hiking trail
on the northern portion of the corridor would be relocated within the
railroad right-of-way as a `rails-with-trails' facility. Five stations
were proposed on the alignment during the AA: downtown Denton; south
Denton; north Lewisville; downtown Lewisville; and south Lewisville;
with a connection to the DART light rail station at Belt Line in
Carrollton.
The EIS will again examine other reasonable alternatives emerge
from scoping. These may include alternatives that were screened out
during the AA but that may now be available due to recent demographic
trends, anticipated funding levels, or technological advances. The EIS
will also evaluate the appropriate end-of-line and associated
facilities and connections into the DART system in Carrollton and in
downtown Denton. As part of the transit evaluation, station locations,
railyard facilities, and other ancillary facilities such as stormwater
management systems will be studied and identified as appropriate.
The EIS will also fully evaluate the No-Action Alternative and a
TSM alternative. Other alternatives may be added as a result of scoping
and agency coordination efforts.
IV. Probable Effects/Potential Impacts for Analysis
The EIS evaluation will analyze social, economic, and environmental
impacts of the alternatives. Major issues to be evaluated include air
quality, noise and vibration, aesthetics, community cohesion impacts,
and possible disruption of neighborhoods, businesses and commercial
activities. The impact areas and level of detail addressed in the EIS
will be consistent with the requirements of SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 and
the FTA/Federal Highway Administration environmental regulation
(Environmental Impact and Related Procedures, 23 CFR part 771 and 40
CFR parts 1500-1508) and other environmental and related regulations.
Among other factors, the EIS will evaluate:
Transportation service including future corridor capacity;
Transit ridership and costs;
Traffic movements and changes and associated impacts to
local facilities;
Community impacts such as land use, displacements, noise
and vibration, neighborhood compatibility and aesthetics; and
Resource impacts including impacts to historic and
archaeological resources, parklands, cultural resource impacts,
environmental justice, and natural resource impacts including air
quality, wetlands, water quality, and wildlife.
The proposed impact assessment and evaluation will take into
account both positive and negative impacts, direct and indirect
impacts, short-term (during the construction period) and long-terms
impacts, and site-specific as well as corridor-wide impacts. Mitigation
measures will be identified for any adverse environmental impacts that
are identified.
Other potential impacts may be added as a result of scoping and
agency coordination efforts.
Issued on: March 7, 2006.
Robert C. Patrick,
Regional Administrator, Federal Transit Administration, Fort Worth,
Texas.
[FR Doc. 06-2337 Filed 3-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-M