Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Alabama: State Implementation Plan Revision, 12138-12141 [06-2184]
Download as PDF
12138
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 46 / Thursday, March 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation because we are
establishing a security zone.
An ‘‘Environmental Analysis Check
List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ (CED) will be available
in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
I
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.1197, to read as follows:
§ 165.1197 Security Zones; San Francisco
Bay, San Pablo Bay, Carquinez Strait,
Suisun Bay, California.
(a) Locations. The following areas are
security zones:
(1) Chevron Long Wharf, San
Francisco Bay. This security zone
includes all waters extending from the
surface to the sea floor within
approximately 100 yards of the Chevron
Long Wharf, Richmond, CA, and
encompasses all waters in San Francisco
Bay within a line connecting the
following geographical positions—
Latitude
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with RULES
37°55′52.2″
37°55′41.8″
37°55′26.8″
37°55′47.1″
37°55′42.9″
37°55′11.2″
37°55′14.4″
37°55′19.7″
37°55′22.2″
37°55′38.5″
37°55′47.8″
Longitude
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
122°24′04.7″
122°24′07.1″
122°24′35.9″
122°24′55.5″
122°25′03.5″
122°24′32.8″
122°24′27.5″
122°24′23.7″
122°24′26.2″
122°23′56.9″
122°23′53.3″
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
and along the shoreline back to the
beginning point.
(2) Conoco-Phillips, San Pablo Bay.
This security zone includes all waters
extending from the surface to the sea
floor within approximately 100 yards of
the Conoco-Phillips Wharf, Rodeo, CA,
and encompasses all waters in San
Pablo Bay within a line connecting the
following geographical positions—
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:06 Mar 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
38°03′06.0″
38°03′20.7″
38°03′21.8″
38°03′29.1″
38°03′23.8″
38°03′16.8″
38°03′18.6″
38°03′04.0″
Longitude
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
122°15′32.4″
122°15′35.8″
122°15′29.8″
122°15′31.8″
122°15′55.8″
122°15′53.2″
122°15′45.2″
122°15′42.0″
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
and along the shoreline back to the
beginning point.
(3) Shell Terminal, Carquinez Strait.
This security zone includes all waters
extending from the surface to the sea
floor within approximately 100 yards of
the Shell Terminal, Martinez, CA, and
encompasses all waters in San Pablo
Bay within a line connecting the
following geographical positions—
Latitude
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
I
Latitude
38°01′39.8″
38°01′54.0″
38°01′56.9″
38°02′02.7″
38°01′49.5″
38°01′43.7″
38°01′50.1″
38°01′36.3″
Longitude
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
122°07′40.3″
122°07′43.0″
122°07′37.9″
122°07′42.6″
122°08′08.7″
122°08′04.2″
122°07′50.5″
122°07′47.6″
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
and along the shoreline back to the
beginning point.
(4) Amorco Pier, Carquinez Strait.
This security zone includes all waters
extending from the surface to the sea
floor within approximately 100 yards of
the Amorco Pier, Martinez, CA, and
encompasses all waters in the Carquinez
Strait within a line connecting the
following geographical positions—
Latitude
38°02′03.1″
38°02′05.6″
38°02′07.9″
38°02′13.0″
38°02′05.7″
38°02′00.5″
38°02′01.8″
38°01′55.0″
Longitude
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
122°07′11.9″
122°07′18.9″
122°07′14.9″
122°07′19.4″
122°07′35.9″
122°07′31.1″
122°07′27.3″
122°07′11.0″
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
and along the shoreline back to the
beginning point.
(5) Valero, Carquinez Strait. This
security zone includes all waters
extending from the surface to the sea
floor within approximately 100 yards of
the Valero Pier, Benicia, CA, and
encompasses all waters in the Carquinez
Strait within a line connecting the
following geographical positions—
Latitude
38°02′37.6″
38°02′34.7″
38°02′44.1″
38°02′48.0″
38°02′47.7″
PO 00000
Longitude
N
N
N
N
N
Frm 00018
122°07′51.5″
122°07′48.9″
122°07′34.9″
122°07′37.9″
122°07′42.1″
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
W
W
W
W
W
and along the shoreline back to the
beginning point.
(6) Avon Pier, Suisun Bay. This
security zone includes all waters
extending from the surface to the sea
floor within approximately 100 yards of
the Avon Pier, Martinez, CA, and
encompasses all waters in Suisun Bay
within a line connecting the following
geographical positions—
Latitude
38°02′24.6″
38°02′54.0″
38°02′55.8″
38°03′02.1″
38°02′55.1″
38°02′48.8″
38°02′52.4″
38°02′46.5″
Longitude
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
122°04′52.9″
122°05′19.5″
122°05′16.1″
122°05′19.4″
122°05′42.6″
122°05′39.2″
122°05′27.7″
122°05′22.4″
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
and along the shoreline back to the
beginning point.
(b) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with the general regulations in § 165.33,
entry into the security zones described
in paragraph (a) of this section is
prohibited, unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
San Francisco Bay, or his designated
representative.
(2) Persons desiring to transit the area
of a security zone may contact the
Captain of the Port at telephone number
415–399–3547 or on VHF–FM channel
16 (156.8 MHz) to seek permission to
transit the area. If permission is granted,
all persons and vessels must comply
with the instructions of the Captain of
the Port or his designated
representative.
(c) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of these security zones by
federal, state and local law enforcement
as necessary.
Dated: February 17, 2006.
W.J. Uberti,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, San Francisco Bay, California.
[FR Doc. 06–2257 Filed 3–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2005–AL–0002–200528a;
FRL–8042–9]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Alabama: State
Implementation Plan Revision
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 46 / Thursday, March 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to
the Alabama State Implementation Plan
(SIP), submitted by the Alabama
Department of Environmental
Management (ADEM) on September 11,
2003. The revisions include
modifications to Alabama’s open
burning rules found at Alabama
Administrative Code (AAC) Chapter
335–3–3–.01. These revisions are part of
Alabama’s strategy to meet the national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
by reducing emissions of volatile
organic compounds and nitrogen
oxides. Open burning creates smoke that
contains fine particles (PM2.5) and
precursors to ozone. ADEM has found
that elevated levels of PM2.5 mirror the
months when ozone levels are highest
(May–September). These rules are
intended to help control levels of PM2.5
and ozone precursors that contribute to
high ozone and PM2.5 levels. Today’s
action is being taken pursuant to section
110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). In its
September 11, 2003, submittal, ADEM
also proposed SIP revisions to include
changes to AAC Chapter 335–3–4,
concerning opacity. EPA is not acting on
that part of the revision at this time.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective
May 8, 2006 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comment
by April 10, 2006. If adverse comment
is received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number, ‘‘EPA–
R04–OAR–2005–AL–0002,’’ by one of
the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: difrank.stacy@epa.gov.
3. Fax: 404–562–9019.
4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2005–AL–
0002,’’ Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Stacy
DiFrank, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division 12th floor, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–
8960. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office’s normal
hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID Number, ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:06 Mar 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
2005–AL–0002.’’ EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
through https://www.regulations.gov or
e-mail, information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12139
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m. excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stacy DiFrank, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street,
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562–9042.
Ms. DiFrank can also be reached via
electronic mail at
difrank.stacy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Today’s Action
On September 11, 2003, ADEM
submitted to EPA proposed SIP
revisions for review and approval into
the Alabama SIP. The proposed
revisions include changes made by the
State of Alabama to its open burning
regulations, found at AAC Chapter 335–
3–3–.01. These rules became state
effective on October 2, 2003.
The original provisions that were part
of Chapter 335–3–3–.01(1) still exists,
with the exception of subpart (i), which
was deleted and included as part of the
newly added provision, 335–3–3–.01(2).
In summary, the revisions submitted by
ADEM include changes to the duration,
timing, and location of open burning,
and add other specific requirements for
open burning.
These other requirements include
expansion of the seasonal ban on open
burning to now include the months of
May and September, and the additional
counties of Baldwin, Lawrence,
Madison, Mobile, Montgomery, Morgan,
and Shelby. The new provision, Chapter
335–3–3–.01(2), also describes new
requirements for open burning which
include, among others: (1) A limitation
on open burning of vegetation or
untreated wood for only the specified
purposes; (2) a specification regarding
fuel; (3) setbacks for all open burning;
(4) a requirement to reduce traffic
hazards associated with the burning;
and (5) a limit on the hours of open
burning. No action is being taken with
regard to the last paragraph of Chapter
335–3–3–.01(2)(d), referring to open
burning in Morgan County during 2003,
because it was removed from the
Alabama SIP in a separate action in
December 2005 (70 FR 76694, December
28, 2005). The proposed revisions
summarized above are approvable
pursuant to section 110 of the CAA.
EPA is now taking direct final action
to approve the proposed revisions,
specifically, AAC Chapter 335–3–3–
.01(1) and .01(2), into the Alabama SIP.
These revisions include the entirety of
Alabama’s open burning rules and are
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
12140
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 46 / Thursday, March 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
part of the State’s strategy to meet the
NAAQS by reducing emissions of
volatile organic compounds and
nitrogen oxides.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with RULES
II. Final Action
EPA is taking direct final action to
approve revisions to the Alabama SIP to
include changes made to Alabama’s
open burning rules found at AAC
Chapter 335–3–3–.01, as submitted on
September 11, 2003, with the exception
of one sentence in 335–3–3–.01(2)(d)
regarding Morgan County. In addition,
at this time, EPA is not acting on the
revision to AAC Chapter 335–3–4
concerning opacity.
EPA is publishing this rule without
prior proposal because the Agency
views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed
rules section of this Federal Register
publication, EPA is publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposal to approve the SIP revision
should adverse comments be filed. This
rule will be effective May 8, 2006
without further notice unless the
Agency receives adverse comments by
April 10, 2006.
If EPA receives such comments, EPA
will then publish a document
withdrawing the direct final rule and
informing the public that such rule will
not take effect. All public comments
received will then be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period. Parties
interested in commenting should do so
at this time. If no such comments are
received, the public is advised that this
rule will be effective on May 8, 2006
and no further action will be taken on
the proposed rule.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:06 Mar 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
CAA. This rule also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045, ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. In this context, in the absence
of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the CAA. Thus, the requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not
apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by May 8, 2006. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this rule for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: February 17, 2006.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
I
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart B—Alabama
2. Section 52.50(c) is amended by
revising entries for ‘‘Section 335–3–
3.01’’ to read as follows:
I
§ 52.50
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
*
*
12141
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 46 / Thursday, March 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
EPA APPROVED ALABAMA REGULATIONS
State citation
Title/subject
State effective
date
EPA approval date
Chapter 335–3–3
Control of Open Burning and Incineration
*
*
*
Section 335–3–3–.01 .............. Open Burning .........................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 06–2184 Filed 3–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R05–RCRA–2006–0043; FRL–8040–3]
Michigan: Final Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revision
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EPA is granting Michigan
final authorization of the changes to its
hazardous waste management program
under the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA). The Agency
published a proposed rule on November
23, 2005, at 70 FR 70761 and provided
for public comment. The public
comment period ended on December 23,
2005. We received no comments. No
further opportunity for comment will be
provided. EPA has determined that
these changes satisfy all requirements
needed to qualify for final authorization
and is authorizing the State’s changes
through this final action.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This final authorization
will be effective on March 9, 2006.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–RCRA–2006–0043. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:06 Mar 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
Explanation
*
10/2/2003
*
3/9/2006 [Insert citation of
publication].
*
*
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the
following addresses: Michigan
Department of Environmental Quality,
Waste Management Division,
Constitution Hall—Atrium North,
Lansing, Michigan (mailing address P.O.
Box 30241, Lansing, Michigan 48909),
contact Ronda Blayer (517) 353–9548;
and EPA Region 5, contact Judy Feigler
at the following address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy
Feigler, Waste, Pesticides and Toxics
Division, Program Management Branch,
State Programs and Authorization
Section, Mail Code DM–7J, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604,
(312) 886–4179; fax number (312) 353–
3159; e-mail address:
Feigler.Judith@epa.gov.
*
*
*
We are not acting on the portion of section 2(d) stating
‘‘During 2003 only burning
may be conducted in Morgan County if any air curtain incinerator is used to
burn the materials.’’
*
modified or when certain other changes
occur. Most commonly, states must
change their programs because of EPA’s
changes to its own regulations in 40
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts
124, 260 through 266, 268, 270, 273 and
279.
A. Why Are Revisions to State
Programs Necessary?
B. What Decisions Have We Made in
This Rule?
We conclude that Michigan’s
application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and
regulatory requirements established by
RCRA. Therefore, we hereby grant
Michigan final authorization to operate
its hazardous waste management
program with the changes described in
the authorization application. Michigan
has responsibility for permitting
treatment, storage, and disposal
facilities (TSDFs) within its borders
(except in Indian country) and for
carrying out the aspects of the RCRA
described in its revised program
application, subject to the limitations of
the Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments of 1984 (HSWA). New
federal requirements and prohibitions
imposed by federal regulations that EPA
promulgates under the authority of
HSWA take effect in authorized states
before they are authorized for the
requirements. Thus, EPA will
implement those requirements and
prohibitions in Michigan, including
issuing permits, until the State is
granted authorization to do so.
States which have received final
authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the federal
program. As the federal program
changes, states must change their
programs and ask EPA to authorize the
changes. Changes to state programs may
be necessary when federal or state
statutory or regulatory authority is
C. What Is the Effect of Today’s
Authorization Decision?
This decision means that a facility in
Michigan subject to RCRA will now
have to comply with the authorized
state requirements (listed in section F of
this document) instead of the equivalent
federal requirements in order to comply
with RCRA. Michigan has enforcement
responsibilities under its state
hazardous waste management program
for violations of such program, but EPA
On
November 23, 2005, EPA published a
proposed rule proposing to grant
Michigan authorization for changes to
its RCRA hazardous waste management
program, listed in Section F of that
notice, which was subject to public
comment. No comments were received.
We hereby determine that Michigan’s
hazardous waste program revisions
satisfy all of the requirements necessary
to qualify for final authorization.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 46 (Thursday, March 9, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12138-12141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-2184]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2005-AL-0002-200528a; FRL-8042-9]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Alabama: State
Implementation Plan Revision
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12139]]
SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the Alabama State Implementation
Plan (SIP), submitted by the Alabama Department of Environmental
Management (ADEM) on September 11, 2003. The revisions include
modifications to Alabama's open burning rules found at Alabama
Administrative Code (AAC) Chapter 335-3-3-.01. These revisions are part
of Alabama's strategy to meet the national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) by reducing emissions of volatile organic compounds
and nitrogen oxides. Open burning creates smoke that contains fine
particles (PM2.5) and precursors to ozone. ADEM has found that elevated
levels of PM2.5 mirror the months when ozone levels are highest (May-
September). These rules are intended to help control levels of PM2.5
and ozone precursors that contribute to high ozone and PM2.5 levels.
Today's action is being taken pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air
Act (CAA). In its September 11, 2003, submittal, ADEM also proposed SIP
revisions to include changes to AAC Chapter 335-3-4, concerning
opacity. EPA is not acting on that part of the revision at this time.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective May 8, 2006 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by April 10, 2006. If
adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number, ``EPA-
R04-OAR-2005-AL-0002,'' by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: difrank.stacy@epa.gov.
3. Fax: 404-562-9019.
4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2005-AL-0002,'' Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Stacy DiFrank, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division 12th floor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID Number, ``EPA-R04-
OAR-2005-AL-0002.'' EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through http:/
/www.regulations.gov or e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m. excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stacy DiFrank, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404)
562-9042. Ms. DiFrank can also be reached via electronic mail at
difrank.stacy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Today's Action
On September 11, 2003, ADEM submitted to EPA proposed SIP revisions
for review and approval into the Alabama SIP. The proposed revisions
include changes made by the State of Alabama to its open burning
regulations, found at AAC Chapter 335-3-3-.01. These rules became state
effective on October 2, 2003.
The original provisions that were part of Chapter 335-3-3-.01(1)
still exists, with the exception of subpart (i), which was deleted and
included as part of the newly added provision, 335-3-3-.01(2). In
summary, the revisions submitted by ADEM include changes to the
duration, timing, and location of open burning, and add other specific
requirements for open burning.
These other requirements include expansion of the seasonal ban on
open burning to now include the months of May and September, and the
additional counties of Baldwin, Lawrence, Madison, Mobile, Montgomery,
Morgan, and Shelby. The new provision, Chapter 335-3-3-.01(2), also
describes new requirements for open burning which include, among
others: (1) A limitation on open burning of vegetation or untreated
wood for only the specified purposes; (2) a specification regarding
fuel; (3) setbacks for all open burning; (4) a requirement to reduce
traffic hazards associated with the burning; and (5) a limit on the
hours of open burning. No action is being taken with regard to the last
paragraph of Chapter 335-3-3-.01(2)(d), referring to open burning in
Morgan County during 2003, because it was removed from the Alabama SIP
in a separate action in December 2005 (70 FR 76694, December 28, 2005).
The proposed revisions summarized above are approvable pursuant to
section 110 of the CAA.
EPA is now taking direct final action to approve the proposed
revisions, specifically, AAC Chapter 335-3-3-.01(1) and .01(2), into
the Alabama SIP. These revisions include the entirety of Alabama's open
burning rules and are
[[Page 12140]]
part of the State's strategy to meet the NAAQS by reducing emissions of
volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides.
II. Final Action
EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
Alabama SIP to include changes made to Alabama's open burning rules
found at AAC Chapter 335-3-3-.01, as submitted on September 11, 2003,
with the exception of one sentence in 335-3-3-.01(2)(d) regarding
Morgan County. In addition, at this time, EPA is not acting on the
revision to AAC Chapter 335-3-4 concerning opacity.
EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should
adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective May 8, 2006
without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by
April 10, 2006.
If EPA receives such comments, EPA will then publish a document
withdrawing the direct final rule and informing the public that such
rule will not take effect. All public comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA
will not institute a second comment period. Parties interested in
commenting should do so at this time. If no such comments are received,
the public is advised that this rule will be effective on May 8, 2006
and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA.
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to
disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by May 8, 2006. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: February 17, 2006.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart B--Alabama
0
2. Section 52.50(c) is amended by revising entries for ``Section 335-3-
3.01'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.50 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 12141]]
EPA Approved Alabama Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 335-3-3 Control of Open Burning and Incineration
* * * * * * *
Section 335-3-3-.01.............. Open Burning....... 10/2/2003 3/9/2006 [Insert We are not acting
citation of on the portion of
publication]. section 2(d)
stating ``During
2003 only burning
may be conducted
in Morgan County
if any air curtain
incinerator is
used to burn the
materials.''
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 06-2184 Filed 3-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P