Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Model Hawker 800XP Airplanes, 11343-11345 [E6-3219]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
are issuing this AD to prevent a potential
source of ignition near a fuel tank, which, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors,
could result in a fuel tank explosion and
consequent loss of the airplane.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
[Docket No. FAA–2006–24084; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–017–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Valve Replacement
(f) Within 5,000 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, replace the de-icing
system ejector flow control valves, part
number (P/N) 3D2376–06, with new,
improved flow control valves having
hermetically sealed switches, P/N 3D2376–
07; and rewire the applicable connectors; in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of EMBRAER Service Bulletin
120–30–0034, Revision 01, dated September
22, 2004.
Previously Accomplished Actions
(g) Actions accomplished before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with
EMBRAER Service Bulletin 120–30–0034,
dated October 30, 2003, are considered
acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding actions of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Related Information
(i) Brazilian airworthiness directive 2005–
12–02, dated January 19, 2006, also addresses
the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
23, 2006.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–3216 Filed 3–6–06; 8:45 am]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon
Model Hawker 800XP Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Raytheon Model Hawker 800XP
airplanes. This proposed AD would
require inspecting certain bus bars in
the DA–A panel to ensure that the bus
bars match the panel configuration and
clearance is adequate between the bus
bars and adjacent components, and
performing corrective action if
necessary. This proposed AD results
from two reports of inadequate
clearance between the bus bars in the
DA–A panel. We are proposing this AD
to prevent insufficient electrical
isolation for the electrical bus
configuration and inability of the
flightcrew to isolate the bus bars in an
emergency situation involving a dual
generator failure, which could result in
extra loads on the main ship batteries
and consequent loss of power to the
main essential bus.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Raytheon Aircraft Company,
Department 62, P.O. Box 85, Wichita,
Kansas, 67201–0085, for the service
information identified in this proposed
AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11343
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Philip Petty, Aerospace Engineer,
Electrical Systems and Avionics, ACE–
119W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road,
room 100, Mid-Continent Airport,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316)
946–4139; fax (316) 946–4107.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2006–24084; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–017–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
Discussion
We have received two reports of
inadequate clearance between the bus
bars in the DA–A panel on Raytheon
Model Hawker 800XP airplanes. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in insufficient electrical isolation for the
electrical bus configuration and
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
11344
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
inability of the flightcrew to isolate the
bus bars in an emergency situation
involving a dual generator failure,
which could result in extra loads on the
main ship batteries and consequent loss
of power to the main essential bus.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Raytheon Service
Bulletin SB 24–3745, Revision 1, dated
September 2005. The service bulletin
describes procedures for inspecting
certain bus bars in the DA–A panel to
ensure that the bus bars match the panel
configuration and clearance is adequate
between the bus bars and adjacent
components, and performing corrective
action if necessary. For any bus bar that
does not match the panel configuration,
or if inadequate clearance exists, the
corrective action includes removing the
applicable bus bar(s), straightening the
bus bar(s) and lug(s) if necessary, and
reconfiguring the bus bars to match the
configuration shown in Figure 1 of the
service bulletin.
Accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information is intended to
adequately address the unsafe
condition.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other airplanes of this same
type design. For this reason, we are
proposing this AD, which would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously, except as discussed under
Difference Between Proposed AD and
Service Bulletin.
Difference Between Proposed AD and
Service Bulletin
Although the Accomplishment
Instructions of the service bulletin
referenced in this proposed AD specify
to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this proposed AD does
not include that requirement.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Clarification of Service Bulletin Note
The service bulletin includes a note in
the Accomplishment Instructions to
inform operators to contact Raytheon
‘‘should any difficulty be encountered’’
in accomplishing the service bulletin.
We have included Note 2 in this
proposed AD to clarify that any
deviation from the instructions
provided in the service bulletin must be
approved as an alternative method of
compliance under paragraph (i)(1) of
this proposed AD.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
Costs of Compliance
There are about 164 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
This proposed AD would affect about
123 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
proposed inspection would take about 1
work hour per airplane, at an average
labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based
on these figures, the estimated cost of
the proposed inspection for U.S.
operators is $7,995, or $65 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Raytheon Aircraft Company: Docket No.
FAA–2006–24084; Directorate Identifier
2006–NM–017–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by April 21, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Raytheon Model
Hawker 800XP airplanes, certificated in any
category; serial numbers 258541, 258556,
258567 through 258609 inclusive, 258611
through 258628 inclusive, 258630 through
258684 inclusive, and 258686 through
258728 inclusive.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from two reports of
inadequate clearance between the bus bars in
the DA–A panel. We are issuing this AD to
prevent insufficient electrical isolation for
the electrical bus configuration and inability
of the flightcrew to isolate the bus bars in an
emergency situation involving a dual
generator failure, which could result in extra
loads on the main ship batteries and
consequent loss of power to the main
essential bus.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection/Corrective Action
(f) Within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD: Do a detailed inspection of the
four bus bars in the DA–A panel to ensure
that the bus bars match the panel
configuration and clearance is adequate
between the bus bars and adjacent
components, by doing all the actions in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Raytheon Service Bulletin SB
24–3745, Revision 1, dated September 2005.
Accomplish any applicable corrective action
before further flight in accordance with the
service bulletin.
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is defined as: ‘‘An
intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at intensity deemed appropriate by
the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface
cleaning and elaborate access procedures
may be required.’’
Note 2: A note in the Accomplishment
Instructions of the Raytheon service bulletin
instructs operators to contact Raytheon if any
difficulty is encountered in accomplishing
the service bulletin. However, any deviation
from the instructions provided in the service
bulletin must be approved as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) under
paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
Inspections Accomplished According to
Previous Issue of Service Bulletin
(g) Inspections accomplished before the
effective date of this AD according to
Raytheon Service Bulletin SB 24–3745, dated
September 2005, are considered acceptable
for compliance with the inspections specified
in paragraph (f) of this AD.
No Reporting Requirement
(h) Although the Accomplishment
Instructions of Raytheon Service Bulletin SB
24–3745, Revision 1, dated September 2005,
specify submitting certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
27, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–3219 Filed 3–6–06; 8:45 am]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–24073; Directorate
Identifier 2002–NM–272–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 727–200 Series Airplanes
Equipped With a No. 3 Cargo Door
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to
supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) that applies to certain
Boeing Model 727–200 series airplanes.
The existing AD currently requires
initial and repetitive inspections for
cracks in the forward frame of the No.
3 cargo door cutout; and corrective
actions, if necessary. The existing AD
also provides for an optional structural
modification, which terminates the
repetitive inspections. This proposed
AD would reduce the compliance time
for the initial inspections and add an
optional method of inspection for both
the initial and repetitive inspections.
This proposed AD would also add
initial and repetitive inspections of an
additional area and repair if necessary.
Additionally, this proposed AD would
clarify that the previously optional
structural modification is now required
by other rulemaking. This proposed AD
results from additional reports of
cracking in the forward frame of the No.
3 cargo door cutout. We are proposing
this AD to detect and correct cracking of
the forward frame and fuselage skin of
the No. 3 cargo door cutout, which
could result in failure of the frame and
skin, and consequent rapid
decompression of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11345
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel F. Kutz, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055–4056; telephone
(425) 917–6456; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Include the
docket number ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2006–
24073; Directorate Identifier 2002–NM–
272–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11343-11345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-3219]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-24084; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-017-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Model Hawker 800XP Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Raytheon Model Hawker 800XP airplanes. This proposed AD
would require inspecting certain bus bars in the DA-A panel to ensure
that the bus bars match the panel configuration and clearance is
adequate between the bus bars and adjacent components, and performing
corrective action if necessary. This proposed AD results from two
reports of inadequate clearance between the bus bars in the DA-A panel.
We are proposing this AD to prevent insufficient electrical isolation
for the electrical bus configuration and inability of the flightcrew to
isolate the bus bars in an emergency situation involving a dual
generator failure, which could result in extra loads on the main ship
batteries and consequent loss of power to the main essential bus.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Raytheon Aircraft Company, Department 62, P.O. Box 85,
Wichita, Kansas, 67201-0085, for the service information identified in
this proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Petty, Aerospace Engineer,
Electrical Systems and Avionics, ACE-119W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, room 100, Mid-Continent
Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316) 946-4139; fax (316)
946-4107.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``FAA-2006-
24084; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-017-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after the Docket Management System
receives them.
Discussion
We have received two reports of inadequate clearance between the
bus bars in the DA-A panel on Raytheon Model Hawker 800XP airplanes.
This condition, if not corrected, could result in insufficient
electrical isolation for the electrical bus configuration and
[[Page 11344]]
inability of the flightcrew to isolate the bus bars in an emergency
situation involving a dual generator failure, which could result in
extra loads on the main ship batteries and consequent loss of power to
the main essential bus.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Raytheon Service Bulletin SB 24-3745, Revision 1,
dated September 2005. The service bulletin describes procedures for
inspecting certain bus bars in the DA-A panel to ensure that the bus
bars match the panel configuration and clearance is adequate between
the bus bars and adjacent components, and performing corrective action
if necessary. For any bus bar that does not match the panel
configuration, or if inadequate clearance exists, the corrective action
includes removing the applicable bus bar(s), straightening the bus
bar(s) and lug(s) if necessary, and reconfiguring the bus bars to match
the configuration shown in Figure 1 of the service bulletin.
Accomplishing the actions specified in the service information is
intended to adequately address the unsafe condition.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of this same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information described previously, except as discussed under Difference
Between Proposed AD and Service Bulletin.
Difference Between Proposed AD and Service Bulletin
Although the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin
referenced in this proposed AD specify to submit certain information to
the manufacturer, this proposed AD does not include that requirement.
Clarification of Service Bulletin Note
The service bulletin includes a note in the Accomplishment
Instructions to inform operators to contact Raytheon ``should any
difficulty be encountered'' in accomplishing the service bulletin. We
have included Note 2 in this proposed AD to clarify that any deviation
from the instructions provided in the service bulletin must be approved
as an alternative method of compliance under paragraph (i)(1) of this
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 164 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This proposed AD would affect about 123 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The proposed inspection would take about 1 work hour per
airplane, at an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of the proposed inspection for U.S.
operators is $7,995, or $65 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Raytheon Aircraft Company: Docket No. FAA-2006-24084; Directorate
Identifier 2006-NM-017-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by April 21,
2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Raytheon Model Hawker 800XP airplanes,
certificated in any category; serial numbers 258541, 258556, 258567
through 258609 inclusive, 258611 through 258628 inclusive, 258630
through 258684 inclusive, and 258686 through 258728 inclusive.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from two reports of inadequate clearance
between the bus bars in the DA-A panel. We are issuing this AD to
prevent insufficient electrical isolation for the electrical bus
configuration and inability of the flightcrew to isolate the bus
bars in an emergency situation involving a dual generator failure,
which could result in extra loads on the main ship batteries and
consequent loss of power to the main essential bus.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection/Corrective Action
(f) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD: Do a
detailed inspection of the four bus bars in the DA-A panel to ensure
that the bus bars match the panel configuration and clearance is
adequate between the bus bars and adjacent components, by doing all
the actions in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Raytheon Service Bulletin SB 24-3745, Revision 1, dated September
2005. Accomplish any applicable corrective action before further
flight in accordance with the service bulletin.
[[Page 11345]]
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate
access procedures may be required.''
Note 2: A note in the Accomplishment Instructions of the
Raytheon service bulletin instructs operators to contact Raytheon if
any difficulty is encountered in accomplishing the service bulletin.
However, any deviation from the instructions provided in the service
bulletin must be approved as an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) under paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
Inspections Accomplished According to Previous Issue of Service
Bulletin
(g) Inspections accomplished before the effective date of this
AD according to Raytheon Service Bulletin SB 24-3745, dated
September 2005, are considered acceptable for compliance with the
inspections specified in paragraph (f) of this AD.
No Reporting Requirement
(h) Although the Accomplishment Instructions of Raytheon Service
Bulletin SB 24-3745, Revision 1, dated September 2005, specify
submitting certain information to the manufacturer, this AD does not
include that requirement.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 27, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-3219 Filed 3-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P