Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a Petition To List Agave eggersiana and Solanum conocarpum as Endangered, 11367-11371 [E6-3095]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
digit, 3-digit, and ADC bundle levels are
not permitted.
1. Line 1: Use L201, Column C.
2. Line 2: ‘‘PER’’ or ‘‘NEWS’’ as
applicable, followed by ‘‘FLTS WKG W
FCM.’’
*
*
*
*
*
destinations of the origin ZIP Code in
L201, Column C, of the origin ZIP Code
in Column A; tan Label X or OEL.
*
*
*
*
*
9.2.6 Optional Tray Preparation—
Flat-Size Pieces
22.0 Preparation of Presorted
Periodicals
*
*
*
*
*
a. ADC * * *
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise item a2 to match the CIN code.]
2. Line 2: ‘‘PER’’ or ‘‘NEWS’’ as
applicable, followed by ‘‘FLTS,’’
followed by ‘‘ADC,’’ followed by ‘‘BC/
NBC.’’
*
*
*
*
*
c. Mixed ADC * * *
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise item c2 to match the CIN code.]
2. Line 2: ‘‘PER’’ or ‘‘NEWS’’ as
applicable, followed by ‘‘FLTS,’’
followed by ‘‘BC/NBC WKG.’’
*
*
*
*
*
*
10.0 Preparation for Merged
Containerization of Bundles of Flats
Using City State Product
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise the sacking requirements in item
f for origin mixed ADC mail.]
f. Origin mixed ADC, required; no
minimum; for any remaining bundles
for destinations in L201, Column C, of
the origin ZIP Code in Column A.
1. Line 1: Use L201, Column C.
2. Line 2: ‘‘PER’’ or ‘‘NEWS’’ as
applicable, followed by ‘‘FLTS’’ or
‘‘IRREG’’ as applicable, followed by
‘‘WKG W FCM.’’
*
*
*
*
*
10.1
*
Periodicals
*
10.1.4
*
*
*
Sack Preparation and Labeling
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise the preparation requirements in
item h for origin mixed ADC mail.]
h. 3-digit through mixed ADC sacks.
Any 5-digit scheme and 5-digit bundles
remaining after preparing sacks under
10.1.4a through 10.1.4g, and all 3-digit
scheme, 3-digit, ADC, origin mixed
ADC, and mixed ADC bundles must be
sacked and labeled according to the
applicable requirements under 9.2 for
cosacking of automation rate and
presorted rate bundles, except if there
are no automation rate pieces in the
mailing job, sack and label under
707.22.6, or, if there are no presorted
rate bundles in the mailing job, sack and
label under 707.25.3.
*
*
*
*
*
707
Periodicals
*
*
*
22.2
*
*
*
*
*
*
Bundle Preparation
22.6 Sack Preparation—Flat-Size
Pieces and Irregular Parcels
25.0 Preparation of Flat-Size
Automation Periodicals
*
25.2
*
*
*
Bundling and Labeling
11.0 Preparation of Cobundled
Automation Rate and Presorted Rate
Flats
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise the bundling and labeling
requirements in item f for origin mixed
ADC mail.]
f. Origin mixed ADC, required; no
minimum; for any remaining pieces for
destinations in L201, Column C, of the
origin ZIP Code in Column A; tan label
X or OEL.
*
*
*
*
*
*
25.3
*
11.2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
Periodicals
*
11.2.2
*
*
*
Bundle Preparation
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise the bundling requirements in
item g for origin mixed ADC mail.]
g. Origin mixed ADC, required; no
minimum; for any remaining pieces for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
Sacking and Labeling
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise the sacking and labeling
requirements in item g for origin mixed
ADC mail.]
g. Origin mixed ADC, required; no
minimum; for any remaining pieces for
destinations in L201, Column C, of the
origin ZIP Code in Column A; labeling:
1. Line 1: Use L201, Column C.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Line 2: ‘‘PER FLTS WKG W FCM’’
or ‘‘NEWS FLTS WKG W FCM,’’ as
applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
We will publish an appropriate
amendment to 39 CFR 111 to reflect
these changes if our proposal is
adopted.
Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. E6–3143 Filed 3–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise the bundle labeling
requirements in item e for origin mixed
ADC mail.]
e. Origin mixed ADC, required; no
minimum; for any remaining pieces for
destinations in L201, Column C, of the
origin ZIP Code in Column A; tan label
X or OEL.
*
*
*
*
*
*
11367
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a
Petition To List Agave eggersiana and
Solanum conocarpum as Endangered
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition
finding.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce a 12-month
finding on a petition to list the plants
Agave eggersiana (no common name)
´
and Solanum conocarpum (marron
bacora) as endangered under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). After reviewing the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we find that listing A.
eggersiana and S. conocarpum is not
warranted at this time. However, we
will continue to seek new information
on the biology of these species as well
as potential threats. We also ask the
public to submit to us any new
information that becomes available
concerning the status of, or threats to, A.
eggersiana and S. conocarpum. This
information will help us monitor the
status of these species. If additional data
become available, we may reassess the
need for listing.
DATES: The finding announced in this
document was made on February 22,
2006.
ADDRESSES: The complete file for this
finding is available for inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
´
hours at the Boqueron Ecological
Services Field Office, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Road 301, Km. 5.1 in
´
Boqueron, Puerto Rico. Please submit
any new information, materials,
comments, or questions concerning
these species or this finding to the above
´
address or P.O. Box 491, Boqueron,
Puerto Rico 00622.
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
11368
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Dr.
Jorge E. Saliva, Wildlife Biologist,
´
Boqueron Field Office, at the address
above (787–851–7297, ext. 224).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that, for
any petition to revise the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants that contains substantial
scientific and commercial information
that listing may be warranted, we make
a finding within 12 months of the date
of receipt of the petition. The finding
must be that the petitioned action is (a)
Not warranted; (b) warranted; or (c)
warranted, but that the immediate
proposal of a regulation implementing
the petitioned action is precluded by
other pending proposals to determine
whether any species is threatened or
endangered, and expeditious progress is
being made to add or remove qualified
species from the List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Section
4(b)(3)(C) of the Act requires that a
petition for which the requested action
is found to be warranted but precluded
be treated as though resubmitted on the
date of such finding (that is, requiring
a subsequent finding to be made within
12 months). Each subsequent 12-month
finding will be published in the Federal
Register.
On November 21, 1996, we received
a petition from the U.S. Virgin Islands
Department of Planning and Natural
Resources (DPNR) requesting that we
list two species of plants in the U.S.
Virgin Islands as endangered: Agave
eggersiana and Solanum conocarpum.
We published our finding that the
petition to list A. eggersiana and S.
conocarpum presented substantial
information indicating that the
requested action may be warranted in
the Federal Register on November 16,
1998 (63 FR 63659) and initiated a
status review on these two plants. On
September 1, 2004, a lawsuit was filed
against the Department of the Interior
and the Service by the Center for
Biological Diversity challenging our
alleged failure to publish a 12-month
finding (Center for Biological Diversity
v. Gale Norton et al., Civil Action No.
1:04–CV–2553 CAP) (N.D. Ga.). In a
Stipulated Settlement Agreement,
signed April 27, 2005, we agreed to
submit our 12-month finding to the
Federal Register by February 28, 2006.
Biology and Distribution
Agave eggersiana
Agave eggersiana (no common name)
is a flowering plant of the family
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
Agavaceae (century plant family) known
only from the island of St. Croix in the
U.S. Virgin Islands. Two other species
occur naturally in the Virgin Islands, A.
missionum (corita) and A. sisalana
(sisal), neither of which are endemic to
St. Croix. A. eggersiana was originally
described in 1913 by Trelease from
material collected on St. Croix, and it is
distinguished from other members of
the Agavaceae family by its acaulescent
(without an evident leafy stem), nonsuckering growth habit (does not
reproduce vegetatively by forming
offshoots around its base), and fleshy,
nearly straight leaves with small
marginal prickles (1.00 millimeter (mm)
(0.04 inches (in)) long) that are nearly
straight (Britton and Wilson 1923;
´
Proctor and Acevedo-Rodrıguez 2005).
Its flowers are deep yellow, 5 to 6
centimeters (cm) (1.95 to 2.34 in) long.
Fruits are unknown; after flowering, the
panicles (inflorescence) produce
numerous small vegetative bulbs, from
which the species can be propagated
´
(Proctor and Acevedo-Rodrıguez 2005).
There is no information available on the
biology, ecology, and phenology of A.
eggersiana.
A. eggersiana was originally collected
in 1913 by Trelease on St. Croix (type
location) (Britton and Wilson 1923;
´
Acevedo-Rodrıguez 1996; Proctor and
´
Acevedo-Rodrıguez 2005). Britton and
Wilson (1923) reported the species from
hillsides and plains in the eastern dry
districts of St. Croix but did not provide
population estimates. Information
provided in the petition letter (B. Kojis
and R. Boulon, DPNR, pers. comm.
1996) specified that the species was last
observed growing in the wild around
1984 to 1986 on St. Croix. In a
subsequent letter, DPNR stated that the
species ‘‘may be extinct’’ but that
‘‘descendants from original plants may
exist to the north of Great Pond near the
original site of camp Arawak’’ (D.
Plaskett, DPNR, pers. comm. 2003).
However, no information was provided
to clarify whether or not field surveys
had been conducted in the area to
search for the original plants.
Furthermore, neither letter provided any
scientific literature citations or
systematic survey information in
support of the possibility of extinction
or, rather, extirpation from the wild.
´
Proctor and Acevedo-Rodrıguez (2005)
provided a general description of the
species and state that the species ‘‘now
appears to be extinct in the wild.’’
However, no citations or survey
information were provided. The Service
is uncertain about the original source
that reported the extirpation of this
species from the wild and has not
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
confirmed that any systematic surveys
for this species have been conducted.
Therefore, we believe that at present,
the status of this species in the wild is
unknown.
All currently known occurrences of A.
eggersiana are plants that were
cultivated. Britton and Wilson (1923)
noted that A. eggersiana has been in
cultivation on St. Croix and St. Thomas
as an ornamental plant since the early
20th century. The 1996 petition letter
reported the existence of several small
populations of A. eggersiana established
on St. Croix through propagation efforts
conducted by local horticulturists and
botanical gardens. They mentioned that
propagated plants were distributed to
private individuals for planting as an
effort to prevent extinction of this
species. However, no information was
provided regarding the origin of
propagated materials. D. Plaskett (pers.
comm. 2003) stated that cultivated
plants ‘‘have been established’’ and
specified one privately owned
residential location. We know of other
cultivated specimens on the airport
grounds in St. Croix, the University of
Virgin Islands in St. Thomas (Acevedo´
Rodrıguez, Smithsonian Institution,
pers. comm. 2005), and at botanical
gardens in the United States, such as
Fairchild Tropical Garden in Miami,
Florida.
In summary, both the historic and
present status of A. eggersiana are
unknown; all known plant individuals
are cultivars; systematic surveys for the
species are lacking; no information is
available on the species biology,
ecology, and phenology; and no genetic
studies have been conducted to
determine if there is genetic variability
among known individuals.
Solanum conocarpum
´
Solanum conocarpum (marron
bacora) is a dry forest shrub of the
Solanaceae, or tomato, family that may
attain 3 m (9.8 ft) in height. Its leaves
are from 3.5 to 7 cm (0.62 to 1.5 in)
wide, oblong-elliptic or oblanceolate
(broader at the distal third than the
middle), coriaceous (leathery texture),
glabrous (not hairy), and have a
yellowish midvein. The flowers are
usually paired in nearly sessile (not
stalked) lateral or terminal cymes (flattopped flower cluster). The corolla
consists of five separate petals that are
light violet, greenish at the base, and
about 2 cm (0.78 in) wide. The fruit, a
berry, is ovoid-conical (teardrop
shaped), 2 to 3 cm (0.78 to 1.2 in) long,
and turns from green with white
striations to golden yellow when ripe
´
(Acevedo-Rodrıguez 1996). Little is
known about the reproductive biology
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
of this species (Ray and Stanford 2003).
Ongoing propagation efforts (such as
Ray 2005) will likely provide additional
information.
Although in the petition letter B. Kojis
and R. Boulon (pers. comm. 1996)
suggested that S. conocarpum might be
functionally dioecious (having male and
female flowers on different plants), P.
´
Acevedo-Rodrıguez (pers. comm. 2002)
contradicted this possibility. He
believes that the species is not dioecious
and documented flowers and fruits in
one wild individual he discovered in
the White Cliff area (although it was the
only individual on that side of the
island). Ray and Stanford (2003)
documented that the seeds have thin
coats and are therefore unlikely to be
represented in the soil seed bank. Ray
(2005) reported ample fruit and seed
production in the wild. Although no
seedling recruitment was observed in
the wild by Ray and Stanford (2003) and
J. Saliva (USFWS, pers. observation
(obs.) 2004), Ray (2005) reported that a
few seedlings were observed in the wild
population located in Estate Concordia.
S. conocarpum was originally known
from a type specimen collected by L.C.
Richard at Coral Bay, St. John (U.S.
Virgin Islands), in 1787 (Acevedo´
Rodrıguez 1996). Although no
population estimates are available for
´
the type locality, P. Acevedo-Rodrıguez
(pers. comm. 2002) reported that the
species seemed to be locally common at
the beginning of the 19th century. The
species was rediscovered in 1992 by P.
´
Acevedo-Rodrıguez on the island of St.
John (Ray and Stanford 2003). B. Kojis
and R. Boulon (pers. comm. 1996)
mentioned that only two individuals
were known growing in the wild on St.
John: One individual on Virgin Islands
National Park (VINP) land, and the other
growing on private land. These two
localities are consistent with the
localities reported by Acevedo´
Rodrıguez (1996; pers. comm. 2002),
who described the habitat as dry,
deciduous forest.
´
Acevedo-Rodrıguez (1996) referenced
the possibility of the species being
present on St. Thomas and mentioned a
collection of a sterile specimen from
Virgin Gorda (British Virgin Islands
(BVI)). Information provided by the B.
Kojis and R. Boulon (pers. comm. 1996),
however, reported the collection of a
sterile specimen from Tortola, BVI. P.
´
Acevedo-Rodrıguez (pers. comm. 2002)
clarified that his collection of the sterile
specimen was from Virgin Gorda, but he
believes that the specimen belongs to a
different species, Cestrum laurifolium,
and not S. conocarpum. However, no
surveys have been conducted in St.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
Thomas or the BVI to determine if this
species is present.
On St. John, Ray and Stanford (2003)
reported five mature individuals from a
total of six individuals in two locations
within VINP (Europa Bay and Reef Bay
Valley) and two locations on private
land (Base Hill and Sabbat Point). Ray
(2005) reported two additional locations
(Estate Concordia and Johnson, Friis,
and John’s Folly Bays) and estimates
close to 200 individuals in the wild. The
largest population of S. conocarpum is
near Nanny Point in Estate Concordia (J.
Saliva, pers. obs. 2004). This population
consists of approximately 184 plants
that had been distributed across three
contiguous parcels of privately owned
land. Recently, one of the private
property owners donated a portion of
his property with a significant number
of plants to the VINP (R. Boulon, NPS,
pers. comm. 2006). The next largest
wild population consists of 33 plants
located on private land above Johnson,
Friis, and John’s Folly Bays’ catchments.
Several efforts have been conducted
to propagate S. conocarpum in the last
decade. B. Kojis and R. Boulon (pers.
comm. 1996) reported that a local
horticulturist, E. Gibney, was able to
propagate the species by cuttings
(asexually) collected from the two
individuals known from the wild and to
get them to reproduce sexually by
dusting the flowers. They further report
that the ‘‘many’’ seedlings produced
‘‘appear to grow vigorously.’’ This
information was corroborated by P.
´
Acevedo-Rodrıguez (pers. comm. 2002).
He reported that Gibney has
successfully reproduced this species
and distributed specimens to various
places in the Virgin Islands. He reported
planted individuals (cultivars) in the
Campus of the University of Virgin
Islands in St. Thomas, which are
sexually reproducing; a few more in the
St. George Botanical Garden in St. Croix;
and a few plants in Tortola, Cannel Bay
Hotel on St. John, New York Botanical
Garden, National Botanical Garden in
Dominican Republic, and Puerto Rico
Botanical Garden. He has performed
germination tests and found 100 percent
viability.
Ray and Stanford (2003) developed an
implementation plan to conduct
shadehouse propagation and
reintroduce seedlings within the VINP
on St. John. This project is in progress.
R. Boulon (pers. comm. 2004) reported
that Dr. Ray planted approximately 128
individuals in the park. Ray (2005)
started a propagation project from
cuttings (cloning) to augment
populations of S. conocarpum in a
private property on St. John. More than
300 cuttings were produced. Rooted
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11369
cuttings will be planted during the 2006
rainy season (April to May).
´
P. Acevedo-Rodrıguez (pers. comm.
2002), believes that both A. eggersiana
and S. conocarpum have either small
populations or may be nearly extinct.
However, he believes this is not due to
the current threat of development, but
rather past land use history on the
islands of St. Croix and St. John. From
the 1700s through the late 1800s, 95
percent or more of these islands suffered
intensive and extensive deforestation.
St. Croix was colonized in the mid-to
late-1600s and sugar cane was the
principal product through the late 19th
century. St. John was colonized in the
early 1700s and divided into estates that
principally cultivated sugar cane and
cotton on most of the island (Woodbury
´
and Weaver 1987). Acevedo-Rodrıguez
(1996) believed that the first 130 years
of colonization had been ‘‘particularly
harsh’’ on the natural resources of St.
John. However, Woodbury and Weaver
(1987) report that many of the estates
were abandoned by the late 19th
century and that common trees and
shrubs regenerated, resulting in most of
the island being covered by secondary
forest at the time of their report.
Approximately three-quarters of St. John
is under the administration of the VINP,
which was established in 1956
(Woodbury and Weaver 1987).
Previous Federal Actions
We identified A. eggersiana as a
category 2 candidate species in the
Notice of Review published in the
Federal Register on September 30, 1993
(58 FR 51144). Before 1996, a category
2 species was one for which the Service
had information that proposing as
endangered or threatened may be
appropriate but for which sufficient
information was not currently available
to support a proposed rule. Designation
of category 2 species was discontinued
in the February 28, 1996, Notice of
Review (61 FR 7596). This notice
redefined candidates to include only
species for which we have information
needed to propose them for listing.
We previously considered S.
conocarpum as a category 1 candidate
species in the Notices of Review
published on September 27, 1985 (50 FR
39526) and February 21, 1990 (55 FR
6184). Category 1 candidate species
were species for which the Service had
information to support a proposed rule
to list them as endangered or
threatened. We reclassified S.
conocarpum to a category 2 candidate
species in the Notice of Review
published on September 30, 1993 (58 FR
51144), due to a lack of available
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
11370
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
information on the species’ distribution
and abundance.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Summary of Factors Affecting the
Species
Section 4 of the Act, and
implementing regulations at 50 CFR part
424, set forth procedures for adding
species to the Federal List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants. In making this finding,
information regarding the status and
threats to these species in relation to the
five factors provided in section 4(a)(1) of
the Act is summarized below. Listing
determinations are made solely on the
best scientific and commercial data
available, taking into account any efforts
being made by any State, private citizen,
corporation, or foreign nation to protect
the species. We have examined each of
the five listing factors under the Act for
their application to A. eggersiana and S.
conocarpum as follows:
Factor A: The Present or Threatened
Destruction, Modification, or
Curtailment of the Species’ Habitat or
Range
Agave eggersiana: A. eggersiana is
endemic to the island of St. Croix. Its
status in the wild is uncertain, and all
known individuals are cultivars planted
as ornaments in several areas and
facilities in St. Croix and St. Thomas
´
(Proctor and Acevedo-Rodrıguez 2005;
´
P. Acevedo-Rodrıguez, pers. comm.
2005; D. Plaskett, pers. comm. 2003; B.
Kojis and R. Boulon, pers. comm. 1996;
Britton and Wilson 1923). Acevedo´
Rodrıguez (pers. comm. 2002) believes
that past land use history, as opposed to
the current threat of development, is the
likely cause of A. eggersiana’s apparent
small population numbers.
We believe that there is not sufficient
information to evaluate the extent and
imminence of threats and cannot
conclude that A. eggersiana is
threatened or endangered due to the
destruction and curtailment of its
habitat or range. To our knowledge, no
systematic surveys for the species have
ever been conducted to determine its
true status.
Solanum conocarpum: The presence
of S. conocarpum in the wild has been
confirmed only on the island of St. John.
When the species was petitioned for
listing in 1996, only two individuals
were known to exist in the wild (B.
Kojis and R. Boulon, pers. comm. 1996).
´
Acevedo-Rodrıguez (1996) suggests that
as a result of destruction of more than
90 percent of the natural vegetation in
St. John, primarily due to cultivation in
the first 130 years of colonization, some
of the native and endemic plant species
have become extinct or nearly extinct.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
For S. conocarpum specifically, P.
´
Acevedo-Rodrıguez, (pers. comm. 2002)
believes that past land use history, as
opposed to the current threat of
development, was the likely cause of the
species’ apparent small population
numbers. Furthermore, much of the
island regenerated to varying degrees,
including secondary successional forest
(Woodbury and Weaver 1987; Acevedo´
Rodrıguez 1996).
At present, the species is known from
almost 200 wild individuals in six
locations. Of the six locations, three are
on privately owned land, two are within
VINP, and one occurs on both private
and VINP land. At the site of the largest
number of plants (Estate Concordia/
VINP-area), the Service has been
working with a private landowner and
VINP to implement conservation
measures for the species, to protect in
perpetuity around 80 percent of the
known population, and to expand the
current propagation efforts to double
existing population in the wild (400 to
500 individuals). Additionally, a
portion of the private property where a
large number of the plants in this area
are found was recently donated to the
VINP (R. Boulon, pers. comm. 2006). We
do not have evidence suggesting that
remaining localities under private
ownership where S. conocarpum is
found are under threat of development.
VINP manages for sensitive species,
including S. conocarpum, within the
park. VINP is currently working with
the Service and an adjacent landowner
in the development of conservation
measures and recently accepted the
donation of a portion of the private land
into VINP ownership (R. Boulon, pers.
comm. 2006). Additionally, VINP has a
General Management Plan (GMP) that is
in place and being implemented. One
purpose of the GMP is to establish
strategies and approaches to achieve
and maintain desired conditions for the
park’s cultural and natural resources,
including protecting native plants like
S. conocarpum and their habitats.
While residential and tourism
development may impact this species,
we do not have information suggesting
that these threats are occurring or are
imminent. Furthermore, we do not
know if the species now occurs on St.
Thomas or the BVI. Therefore, we do
not have sufficient information to
conclude that S. conocarpum is either
threatened or endangered due to the
destruction and curtailment of its
habitat or range.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Factor B: Overutilization for
Commercial, Recreational, Scientific, or
Educational Purposes
The information available on the
species does not suggest that
overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes has contributed to the current
status of either A. eggersiana or S.
conocarpum or that any such activities
are threats to these species.
Factor C: Disease or Predation
There have been no systematic studies
to identify parasites or disease in these
species. Therefore, the role of parasites
or disease of A. eggersiana and S.
conocarpum is unknown.
Feral pigs uproot juvenile plants and
destroy the root system of other species
of Agave on Mona Island, apparently to
feed on or obtain moisture from the
roots (J. Saliva, pers. obs. 1983, 1996).
Theoretically, should A. eggersiana be
reintroduced in the wild, it is possible
that feral pigs could cause similar
impacts, particularly to young plants.
Feral donkeys, pigs, and goats could
directly and indirectly affect
populations of S. conocarpum by
uprooting and eating seedlings,
destabilizing slopes, and dispersing
exotic plant species, thus preventing or
reducing sustainability of populations of
S. conocarpum; however, the extent of
such threats to the species is
‘‘speculative’’ (NPS 2003) and
‘‘imprecise’’ (NPS 2004). VINP is
implementing reduction plans to control
the populations of nonnative feral pigs,
goats, and sheep within VINP (NPS
2003, 2004). Feral pig populations in
VINP are low, and reduction efforts
have been targeted to problem areas
(NPS unpublished report. 2006). VINP
believes some goats were removed from
the park even before the reduction plan
commenced, and that removal efforts by
VINP were successful at two locations
where there have been no reports of
goats returning and vegetative growth
has increased (NPS unpublished report
2006). Although vegetation trampling by
donkeys has been observed at the Estate
Concordia population of S. conocarpum
(M. Carper, property owner, and J.
Saliva, pers. obs., 2004), we do not have
evidence to conclude that trampling has
or would result in mortality of S.
conocarpum.
No seedlings have been reported
under mature S. conocarpum shrubs.
Other than gravity, its fruit dispersal
agent is unknown. Where shrub
densities are high, hermit crabs have
been observed feeding on the fruit (Ray
2005). Fruit and seed production in the
largest known wild population of S.
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
conocarpum is reported as ‘‘ample’’
(Ray 2005). While hermit crabs consume
fallen fruit in large quantities (Ray
2005), we do not know if the crabs act
as seed predators (for example, by
crushing seed embryos as they feed) and
are partly responsible for the low
seedling recruitment at this location.
At this time, there is no evidence that
donkeys, pigs, or goats constitute a
specific threat to A. eggersiana or S.
conocarpum by feeding on young or
adult, wild or reintroduced, individuals
of these species. The effects of
consumption of S. conocarpum fruits by
hermit crabs are uncertain. Therefore,
we believe that there is no substantial
evidence indicating that either A.
eggersiana or S. conocarpum is
threatened or endangered due to disease
or predation.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Factor D: The Inadequacy of Existing
Regulatory Mechanisms
The Territory of the U.S. Virgin
Islands currently considers A.
eggersiana and S. conocarpum to be
endangered under the Virgin Islands
Indigenous and Endangered Species Act
(V.I. Code, Title 12, Chapter 2), and has
amended an existing regulation (Bill No.
18–0403) to protect endangered and
threatened wildlife and plants by
prohibiting the take, injury, or
possession of indigenous plants.
The available information on the
species does not suggest that
inadequacy of current regulatory
mechanisms has contributed to the
current status of either A. eggersiana or
S. conocarpum or that such mechanisms
are current threats to these species.
Factor E: Other Natural or Manmade
Factors Affecting the Continued
Existence of the Species
It appears that A. eggersiana may be
extremely rare and its survival may be
dependent on captive propagation and
reintroduction. A. eggersiana is only
found on the island of St. Croix, and it
was last observed growing in the wild
in the mid-1980s. Horticulturist M. Hays
of the St. Georges Botanical Garden
herbarium on St. Croix has propagated
the species and distributed specimens to
the public in the hope of ‘‘saving the
species from extinction’’ (B. Kojis and R.
Boulon, pers. comm.1996). The status of
the species in the wild is uncertain, and
its apparent limited abundance and
distribution are likely the result of past
land use history. However, as systematic
surveys of suitable habitat for this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
11371
species have never been conducted to
our knowledge, we do not have enough
information to determine the true status
of this species in wild and therefore
cannot conclude that the species is
threatened or endangered due to other
natural or manmade factors.
S. conocarpum is currently known
from six locations on St. John. It is
possible that the species may occur in
St. Thomas or the BVI, or at other
locations in St. John. However, no
surveys have ever been conducted to
our knowledge to determine if the
species is present elsewhere. Using the
best available scientific and commercial
information, we are unable to determine
that the small population size
constitutes a threat or that it would
render the species likely to become
endangered or extinct in the near future.
In the Caribbean, native plant species,
particularly endemic species with
limited distribution, may be vulnerable
to natural or manmade events, such as
hurricanes and human-induced fires.
Fire is not a natural component of
subtropical dry forest in Puerto Rico and
the Virgin Islands. Thus, most species
found in this type of forest are not fireadapted. However, there is no
information in the literature indicating
that hurricanes or fires have affected the
known populations of S. conocarpum.
Furthermore, the VINP has a fire
prevention plan which includes the
protection of native species, including
S. conocarpum. We do not have
sufficient information to conclude that
this species is threatened or endangered
due to other natural or manmade
factors.
is likely to become endangered within
the foreseeable future throughout all or
a significant portion of its range.
Based on all the information we have
gathered and reviewed, we found no
evidence that either A. eggersiana or S.
conocarpum are threatened or
endangered by overutilization for
commercial, recreational, or educational
purposes, nor by inadequacies in the
existing regulatory mechanisms. We
also have no data to show that
destruction or curtailment of the
species’ habitat or range, disease or
predation, or other natural or manmade
factors threaten A. eggersiana or S.
conocarpum. After reviewing the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we believe that we do not
have sufficient information to determine
the true status of either Agave
eggersiana or Solanum conocarpum in
the wild and cannot determine if either
species meets the definition of
threatened or endangered due to one or
more of the five listing factors because
we do not have sufficient evidence of
which threats, if any, are operating on
these species.
We will continue to monitor the
status of these species and their
habitats, and will accept additional
information and comments at any time
from all concerned governmental
agencies, the scientific community,
industry, and any other interested
parties concerning this finding. This
information will help us monitor and
encourage beneficial measures for A.
eggersiana and S. conocarpum.
Finding
A complete list of all references cited
herein is available upon request from
´
the Field Supervisor, Boqueron Field
Office (see ADDRESSES section).
We have carefully assessed the best
scientific and commercial information
available regarding threats faced by
Agave eggersiana and Solanum
conocarpum. We reviewed the petition,
available published and unpublished
scientific and commercial information,
and consulted with recognized plant
experts (including those most familiar
with the species), and Territorial and
other Federal resource agencies. We did
not receive additional information from
interested parties during the public
comment period on our 90-day finding.
For us to make a ‘‘warranted’’ finding,
the species must, at a minimum, meet
the definition of a threatened species. In
accordance with section 3(19) of the
Act, a threatened species is one which
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
References Cited
Author
The primary author of this document
´
is the Boqueron Field Office (see
ADDRESSES section).
Authority
The authority for this action is the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: February 22, 2006.
Marshall P. Jones, Jr.,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. E6–3095 Filed 3–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11367-11371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-3095]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding
on a Petition To List Agave eggersiana and Solanum conocarpum as
Endangered
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition finding.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce a 12-
month finding on a petition to list the plants Agave eggersiana (no
common name) and Solanum conocarpum (marr[oacute]n bacora) as
endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
After reviewing the best available scientific and commercial
information, we find that listing A. eggersiana and S. conocarpum is
not warranted at this time. However, we will continue to seek new
information on the biology of these species as well as potential
threats. We also ask the public to submit to us any new information
that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, A.
eggersiana and S. conocarpum. This information will help us monitor the
status of these species. If additional data become available, we may
reassess the need for listing.
DATES: The finding announced in this document was made on February 22,
2006.
ADDRESSES: The complete file for this finding is available for
inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the
Boquer[oacute]n Ecological Services Field Office, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Road 301, Km. 5.1 in Boquer[oacute]n, Puerto Rico.
Please submit any new information, materials, comments, or questions
concerning these species or this finding to the above address or P.O.
Box 491, Boquer[oacute]n, Puerto Rico 00622.
[[Page 11368]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Jorge E. Saliva, Wildlife
Biologist, Boquer[oacute]n Field Office, at the address above (787-851-
7297, ext. 224).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires
that, for any petition to revise the List of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife and Plants that contains substantial scientific and commercial
information that listing may be warranted, we make a finding within 12
months of the date of receipt of the petition. The finding must be that
the petitioned action is (a) Not warranted; (b) warranted; or (c)
warranted, but that the immediate proposal of a regulation implementing
the petitioned action is precluded by other pending proposals to
determine whether any species is threatened or endangered, and
expeditious progress is being made to add or remove qualified species
from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Section
4(b)(3)(C) of the Act requires that a petition for which the requested
action is found to be warranted but precluded be treated as though
resubmitted on the date of such finding (that is, requiring a
subsequent finding to be made within 12 months). Each subsequent 12-
month finding will be published in the Federal Register.
On November 21, 1996, we received a petition from the U.S. Virgin
Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) requesting
that we list two species of plants in the U.S. Virgin Islands as
endangered: Agave eggersiana and Solanum conocarpum. We published our
finding that the petition to list A. eggersiana and S. conocarpum
presented substantial information indicating that the requested action
may be warranted in the Federal Register on November 16, 1998 (63 FR
63659) and initiated a status review on these two plants. On September
1, 2004, a lawsuit was filed against the Department of the Interior and
the Service by the Center for Biological Diversity challenging our
alleged failure to publish a 12-month finding (Center for Biological
Diversity v. Gale Norton et al., Civil Action No. 1:04-CV-2553 CAP)
(N.D. Ga.). In a Stipulated Settlement Agreement, signed April 27,
2005, we agreed to submit our 12-month finding to the Federal Register
by February 28, 2006.
Biology and Distribution
Agave eggersiana
Agave eggersiana (no common name) is a flowering plant of the
family Agavaceae (century plant family) known only from the island of
St. Croix in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Two other species occur naturally
in the Virgin Islands, A. missionum (corita) and A. sisalana (sisal),
neither of which are endemic to St. Croix. A. eggersiana was originally
described in 1913 by Trelease from material collected on St. Croix, and
it is distinguished from other members of the Agavaceae family by its
acaulescent (without an evident leafy stem), non-suckering growth habit
(does not reproduce vegetatively by forming offshoots around its base),
and fleshy, nearly straight leaves with small marginal prickles (1.00
millimeter (mm) (0.04 inches (in)) long) that are nearly straight
(Britton and Wilson 1923; Proctor and Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez 2005).
Its flowers are deep yellow, 5 to 6 centimeters (cm) (1.95 to 2.34 in)
long. Fruits are unknown; after flowering, the panicles (inflorescence)
produce numerous small vegetative bulbs, from which the species can be
propagated (Proctor and Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez 2005). There is no
information available on the biology, ecology, and phenology of A.
eggersiana.
A. eggersiana was originally collected in 1913 by Trelease on St.
Croix (type location) (Britton and Wilson 1923; Acevedo-
Rodr[iacute]guez 1996; Proctor and Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez 2005).
Britton and Wilson (1923) reported the species from hillsides and
plains in the eastern dry districts of St. Croix but did not provide
population estimates. Information provided in the petition letter (B.
Kojis and R. Boulon, DPNR, pers. comm. 1996) specified that the species
was last observed growing in the wild around 1984 to 1986 on St. Croix.
In a subsequent letter, DPNR stated that the species ``may be extinct''
but that ``descendants from original plants may exist to the north of
Great Pond near the original site of camp Arawak'' (D. Plaskett, DPNR,
pers. comm. 2003). However, no information was provided to clarify
whether or not field surveys had been conducted in the area to search
for the original plants. Furthermore, neither letter provided any
scientific literature citations or systematic survey information in
support of the possibility of extinction or, rather, extirpation from
the wild. Proctor and Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez (2005) provided a
general description of the species and state that the species ``now
appears to be extinct in the wild.'' However, no citations or survey
information were provided. The Service is uncertain about the original
source that reported the extirpation of this species from the wild and
has not confirmed that any systematic surveys for this species have
been conducted. Therefore, we believe that at present, the status of
this species in the wild is unknown.
All currently known occurrences of A. eggersiana are plants that
were cultivated. Britton and Wilson (1923) noted that A. eggersiana has
been in cultivation on St. Croix and St. Thomas as an ornamental plant
since the early 20th century. The 1996 petition letter reported the
existence of several small populations of A. eggersiana established on
St. Croix through propagation efforts conducted by local
horticulturists and botanical gardens. They mentioned that propagated
plants were distributed to private individuals for planting as an
effort to prevent extinction of this species. However, no information
was provided regarding the origin of propagated materials. D. Plaskett
(pers. comm. 2003) stated that cultivated plants ``have been
established'' and specified one privately owned residential location.
We know of other cultivated specimens on the airport grounds in St.
Croix, the University of Virgin Islands in St. Thomas (Acevedo-
Rodr[iacute]guez, Smithsonian Institution, pers. comm. 2005), and at
botanical gardens in the United States, such as Fairchild Tropical
Garden in Miami, Florida.
In summary, both the historic and present status of A. eggersiana
are unknown; all known plant individuals are cultivars; systematic
surveys for the species are lacking; no information is available on the
species biology, ecology, and phenology; and no genetic studies have
been conducted to determine if there is genetic variability among known
individuals.
Solanum conocarpum
Solanum conocarpum (marr[oacute]n bacora) is a dry forest shrub of
the Solanaceae, or tomato, family that may attain 3 m (9.8 ft) in
height. Its leaves are from 3.5 to 7 cm (0.62 to 1.5 in) wide, oblong-
elliptic or oblanceolate (broader at the distal third than the middle),
coriaceous (leathery texture), glabrous (not hairy), and have a
yellowish midvein. The flowers are usually paired in nearly sessile
(not stalked) lateral or terminal cymes (flat-topped flower cluster).
The corolla consists of five separate petals that are light violet,
greenish at the base, and about 2 cm (0.78 in) wide. The fruit, a
berry, is ovoid-conical (teardrop shaped), 2 to 3 cm (0.78 to 1.2 in)
long, and turns from green with white striations to golden yellow when
ripe (Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez 1996). Little is known about the
reproductive biology
[[Page 11369]]
of this species (Ray and Stanford 2003). Ongoing propagation efforts
(such as Ray 2005) will likely provide additional information.
Although in the petition letter B. Kojis and R. Boulon (pers. comm.
1996) suggested that S. conocarpum might be functionally dioecious
(having male and female flowers on different plants), P. Acevedo-
Rodr[iacute]guez (pers. comm. 2002) contradicted this possibility. He
believes that the species is not dioecious and documented flowers and
fruits in one wild individual he discovered in the White Cliff area
(although it was the only individual on that side of the island). Ray
and Stanford (2003) documented that the seeds have thin coats and are
therefore unlikely to be represented in the soil seed bank. Ray (2005)
reported ample fruit and seed production in the wild. Although no
seedling recruitment was observed in the wild by Ray and Stanford
(2003) and J. Saliva (USFWS, pers. observation (obs.) 2004), Ray (2005)
reported that a few seedlings were observed in the wild population
located in Estate Concordia.
S. conocarpum was originally known from a type specimen collected
by L.C. Richard at Coral Bay, St. John (U.S. Virgin Islands), in 1787
(Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez 1996). Although no population estimates are
available for the type locality, P. Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez (pers.
comm. 2002) reported that the species seemed to be locally common at
the beginning of the 19th century. The species was rediscovered in 1992
by P. Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez on the island of St. John (Ray and
Stanford 2003). B. Kojis and R. Boulon (pers. comm. 1996) mentioned
that only two individuals were known growing in the wild on St. John:
One individual on Virgin Islands National Park (VINP) land, and the
other growing on private land. These two localities are consistent with
the localities reported by Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez (1996; pers. comm.
2002), who described the habitat as dry, deciduous forest.
Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez (1996) referenced the possibility of the
species being present on St. Thomas and mentioned a collection of a
sterile specimen from Virgin Gorda (British Virgin Islands (BVI)).
Information provided by the B. Kojis and R. Boulon (pers. comm. 1996),
however, reported the collection of a sterile specimen from Tortola,
BVI. P. Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez (pers. comm. 2002) clarified that his
collection of the sterile specimen was from Virgin Gorda, but he
believes that the specimen belongs to a different species, Cestrum
laurifolium, and not S. conocarpum. However, no surveys have been
conducted in St. Thomas or the BVI to determine if this species is
present.
On St. John, Ray and Stanford (2003) reported five mature
individuals from a total of six individuals in two locations within
VINP (Europa Bay and Reef Bay Valley) and two locations on private land
(Base Hill and Sabbat Point). Ray (2005) reported two additional
locations (Estate Concordia and Johnson, Friis, and John's Folly Bays)
and estimates close to 200 individuals in the wild. The largest
population of S. conocarpum is near Nanny Point in Estate Concordia (J.
Saliva, pers. obs. 2004). This population consists of approximately 184
plants that had been distributed across three contiguous parcels of
privately owned land. Recently, one of the private property owners
donated a portion of his property with a significant number of plants
to the VINP (R. Boulon, NPS, pers. comm. 2006). The next largest wild
population consists of 33 plants located on private land above Johnson,
Friis, and John's Folly Bays' catchments.
Several efforts have been conducted to propagate S. conocarpum in
the last decade. B. Kojis and R. Boulon (pers. comm. 1996) reported
that a local horticulturist, E. Gibney, was able to propagate the
species by cuttings (asexually) collected from the two individuals
known from the wild and to get them to reproduce sexually by dusting
the flowers. They further report that the ``many'' seedlings produced
``appear to grow vigorously.'' This information was corroborated by P.
Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez (pers. comm. 2002). He reported that Gibney
has successfully reproduced this species and distributed specimens to
various places in the Virgin Islands. He reported planted individuals
(cultivars) in the Campus of the University of Virgin Islands in St.
Thomas, which are sexually reproducing; a few more in the St. George
Botanical Garden in St. Croix; and a few plants in Tortola, Cannel Bay
Hotel on St. John, New York Botanical Garden, National Botanical Garden
in Dominican Republic, and Puerto Rico Botanical Garden. He has
performed germination tests and found 100 percent viability.
Ray and Stanford (2003) developed an implementation plan to conduct
shadehouse propagation and reintroduce seedlings within the VINP on St.
John. This project is in progress. R. Boulon (pers. comm. 2004)
reported that Dr. Ray planted approximately 128 individuals in the
park. Ray (2005) started a propagation project from cuttings (cloning)
to augment populations of S. conocarpum in a private property on St.
John. More than 300 cuttings were produced. Rooted cuttings will be
planted during the 2006 rainy season (April to May).
P. Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez (pers. comm. 2002), believes that both
A. eggersiana and S. conocarpum have either small populations or may be
nearly extinct. However, he believes this is not due to the current
threat of development, but rather past land use history on the islands
of St. Croix and St. John. From the 1700s through the late 1800s, 95
percent or more of these islands suffered intensive and extensive
deforestation. St. Croix was colonized in the mid-to late-1600s and
sugar cane was the principal product through the late 19th century. St.
John was colonized in the early 1700s and divided into estates that
principally cultivated sugar cane and cotton on most of the island
(Woodbury and Weaver 1987). Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez (1996) believed
that the first 130 years of colonization had been ``particularly
harsh'' on the natural resources of St. John. However, Woodbury and
Weaver (1987) report that many of the estates were abandoned by the
late 19th century and that common trees and shrubs regenerated,
resulting in most of the island being covered by secondary forest at
the time of their report. Approximately three-quarters of St. John is
under the administration of the VINP, which was established in 1956
(Woodbury and Weaver 1987).
Previous Federal Actions
We identified A. eggersiana as a category 2 candidate species in
the Notice of Review published in the Federal Register on September 30,
1993 (58 FR 51144). Before 1996, a category 2 species was one for which
the Service had information that proposing as endangered or threatened
may be appropriate but for which sufficient information was not
currently available to support a proposed rule. Designation of category
2 species was discontinued in the February 28, 1996, Notice of Review
(61 FR 7596). This notice redefined candidates to include only species
for which we have information needed to propose them for listing.
We previously considered S. conocarpum as a category 1 candidate
species in the Notices of Review published on September 27, 1985 (50 FR
39526) and February 21, 1990 (55 FR 6184). Category 1 candidate species
were species for which the Service had information to support a
proposed rule to list them as endangered or threatened. We reclassified
S. conocarpum to a category 2 candidate species in the Notice of Review
published on September 30, 1993 (58 FR 51144), due to a lack of
available
[[Page 11370]]
information on the species' distribution and abundance.
Summary of Factors Affecting the Species
Section 4 of the Act, and implementing regulations at 50 CFR part
424, set forth procedures for adding species to the Federal List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. In making this finding,
information regarding the status and threats to these species in
relation to the five factors provided in section 4(a)(1) of the Act is
summarized below. Listing determinations are made solely on the best
scientific and commercial data available, taking into account any
efforts being made by any State, private citizen, corporation, or
foreign nation to protect the species. We have examined each of the
five listing factors under the Act for their application to A.
eggersiana and S. conocarpum as follows:
Factor A: The Present or Threatened Destruction, Modification, or
Curtailment of the Species' Habitat or Range
Agave eggersiana: A. eggersiana is endemic to the island of St.
Croix. Its status in the wild is uncertain, and all known individuals
are cultivars planted as ornaments in several areas and facilities in
St. Croix and St. Thomas (Proctor and Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez 2005; P.
Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez, pers. comm. 2005; D. Plaskett, pers. comm.
2003; B. Kojis and R. Boulon, pers. comm. 1996; Britton and Wilson
1923). Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez (pers. comm. 2002) believes that past
land use history, as opposed to the current threat of development, is
the likely cause of A. eggersiana's apparent small population numbers.
We believe that there is not sufficient information to evaluate the
extent and imminence of threats and cannot conclude that A. eggersiana
is threatened or endangered due to the destruction and curtailment of
its habitat or range. To our knowledge, no systematic surveys for the
species have ever been conducted to determine its true status.
Solanum conocarpum: The presence of S. conocarpum in the wild has
been confirmed only on the island of St. John. When the species was
petitioned for listing in 1996, only two individuals were known to
exist in the wild (B. Kojis and R. Boulon, pers. comm. 1996). Acevedo-
Rodr[iacute]guez (1996) suggests that as a result of destruction of
more than 90 percent of the natural vegetation in St. John, primarily
due to cultivation in the first 130 years of colonization, some of the
native and endemic plant species have become extinct or nearly extinct.
For S. conocarpum specifically, P. Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez, (pers.
comm. 2002) believes that past land use history, as opposed to the
current threat of development, was the likely cause of the species'
apparent small population numbers. Furthermore, much of the island
regenerated to varying degrees, including secondary successional forest
(Woodbury and Weaver 1987; Acevedo-Rodr[iacute]guez 1996).
At present, the species is known from almost 200 wild individuals
in six locations. Of the six locations, three are on privately owned
land, two are within VINP, and one occurs on both private and VINP
land. At the site of the largest number of plants (Estate Concordia/
VINP-area), the Service has been working with a private landowner and
VINP to implement conservation measures for the species, to protect in
perpetuity around 80 percent of the known population, and to expand the
current propagation efforts to double existing population in the wild
(400 to 500 individuals). Additionally, a portion of the private
property where a large number of the plants in this area are found was
recently donated to the VINP (R. Boulon, pers. comm. 2006). We do not
have evidence suggesting that remaining localities under private
ownership where S. conocarpum is found are under threat of development.
VINP manages for sensitive species, including S. conocarpum, within
the park. VINP is currently working with the Service and an adjacent
landowner in the development of conservation measures and recently
accepted the donation of a portion of the private land into VINP
ownership (R. Boulon, pers. comm. 2006). Additionally, VINP has a
General Management Plan (GMP) that is in place and being implemented.
One purpose of the GMP is to establish strategies and approaches to
achieve and maintain desired conditions for the park's cultural and
natural resources, including protecting native plants like S.
conocarpum and their habitats.
While residential and tourism development may impact this species,
we do not have information suggesting that these threats are occurring
or are imminent. Furthermore, we do not know if the species now occurs
on St. Thomas or the BVI. Therefore, we do not have sufficient
information to conclude that S. conocarpum is either threatened or
endangered due to the destruction and curtailment of its habitat or
range.
Factor B: Overutilization for Commercial, Recreational, Scientific, or
Educational Purposes
The information available on the species does not suggest that
overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes has contributed to the current status of either A.
eggersiana or S. conocarpum or that any such activities are threats to
these species.
Factor C: Disease or Predation
There have been no systematic studies to identify parasites or
disease in these species. Therefore, the role of parasites or disease
of A. eggersiana and S. conocarpum is unknown.
Feral pigs uproot juvenile plants and destroy the root system of
other species of Agave on Mona Island, apparently to feed on or obtain
moisture from the roots (J. Saliva, pers. obs. 1983, 1996).
Theoretically, should A. eggersiana be reintroduced in the wild, it is
possible that feral pigs could cause similar impacts, particularly to
young plants.
Feral donkeys, pigs, and goats could directly and indirectly affect
populations of S. conocarpum by uprooting and eating seedlings,
destabilizing slopes, and dispersing exotic plant species, thus
preventing or reducing sustainability of populations of S. conocarpum;
however, the extent of such threats to the species is ``speculative''
(NPS 2003) and ``imprecise'' (NPS 2004). VINP is implementing reduction
plans to control the populations of nonnative feral pigs, goats, and
sheep within VINP (NPS 2003, 2004). Feral pig populations in VINP are
low, and reduction efforts have been targeted to problem areas (NPS
unpublished report. 2006). VINP believes some goats were removed from
the park even before the reduction plan commenced, and that removal
efforts by VINP were successful at two locations where there have been
no reports of goats returning and vegetative growth has increased (NPS
unpublished report 2006). Although vegetation trampling by donkeys has
been observed at the Estate Concordia population of S. conocarpum (M.
Carper, property owner, and J. Saliva, pers. obs., 2004), we do not
have evidence to conclude that trampling has or would result in
mortality of S. conocarpum.
No seedlings have been reported under mature S. conocarpum shrubs.
Other than gravity, its fruit dispersal agent is unknown. Where shrub
densities are high, hermit crabs have been observed feeding on the
fruit (Ray 2005). Fruit and seed production in the largest known wild
population of S.
[[Page 11371]]
conocarpum is reported as ``ample'' (Ray 2005). While hermit crabs
consume fallen fruit in large quantities (Ray 2005), we do not know if
the crabs act as seed predators (for example, by crushing seed embryos
as they feed) and are partly responsible for the low seedling
recruitment at this location.
At this time, there is no evidence that donkeys, pigs, or goats
constitute a specific threat to A. eggersiana or S. conocarpum by
feeding on young or adult, wild or reintroduced, individuals of these
species. The effects of consumption of S. conocarpum fruits by hermit
crabs are uncertain. Therefore, we believe that there is no substantial
evidence indicating that either A. eggersiana or S. conocarpum is
threatened or endangered due to disease or predation.
Factor D: The Inadequacy of Existing Regulatory Mechanisms
The Territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands currently considers A.
eggersiana and S. conocarpum to be endangered under the Virgin Islands
Indigenous and Endangered Species Act (V.I. Code, Title 12, Chapter 2),
and has amended an existing regulation (Bill No. 18-0403) to protect
endangered and threatened wildlife and plants by prohibiting the take,
injury, or possession of indigenous plants.
The available information on the species does not suggest that
inadequacy of current regulatory mechanisms has contributed to the
current status of either A. eggersiana or S. conocarpum or that such
mechanisms are current threats to these species.
Factor E: Other Natural or Manmade Factors Affecting the Continued
Existence of the Species
It appears that A. eggersiana may be extremely rare and its
survival may be dependent on captive propagation and reintroduction. A.
eggersiana is only found on the island of St. Croix, and it was last
observed growing in the wild in the mid-1980s. Horticulturist M. Hays
of the St. Georges Botanical Garden herbarium on St. Croix has
propagated the species and distributed specimens to the public in the
hope of ``saving the species from extinction'' (B. Kojis and R. Boulon,
pers. comm.1996). The status of the species in the wild is uncertain,
and its apparent limited abundance and distribution are likely the
result of past land use history. However, as systematic surveys of
suitable habitat for this species have never been conducted to our
knowledge, we do not have enough information to determine the true
status of this species in wild and therefore cannot conclude that the
species is threatened or endangered due to other natural or manmade
factors.
S. conocarpum is currently known from six locations on St. John. It
is possible that the species may occur in St. Thomas or the BVI, or at
other locations in St. John. However, no surveys have ever been
conducted to our knowledge to determine if the species is present
elsewhere. Using the best available scientific and commercial
information, we are unable to determine that the small population size
constitutes a threat or that it would render the species likely to
become endangered or extinct in the near future. In the Caribbean,
native plant species, particularly endemic species with limited
distribution, may be vulnerable to natural or manmade events, such as
hurricanes and human-induced fires. Fire is not a natural component of
subtropical dry forest in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Thus,
most species found in this type of forest are not fire-adapted.
However, there is no information in the literature indicating that
hurricanes or fires have affected the known populations of S.
conocarpum. Furthermore, the VINP has a fire prevention plan which
includes the protection of native species, including S. conocarpum. We
do not have sufficient information to conclude that this species is
threatened or endangered due to other natural or manmade factors.
Finding
We have carefully assessed the best scientific and commercial
information available regarding threats faced by Agave eggersiana and
Solanum conocarpum. We reviewed the petition, available published and
unpublished scientific and commercial information, and consulted with
recognized plant experts (including those most familiar with the
species), and Territorial and other Federal resource agencies. We did
not receive additional information from interested parties during the
public comment period on our 90-day finding.
For us to make a ``warranted'' finding, the species must, at a
minimum, meet the definition of a threatened species. In accordance
with section 3(19) of the Act, a threatened species is one which is
likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout
all or a significant portion of its range.
Based on all the information we have gathered and reviewed, we
found no evidence that either A. eggersiana or S. conocarpum are
threatened or endangered by overutilization for commercial,
recreational, or educational purposes, nor by inadequacies in the
existing regulatory mechanisms. We also have no data to show that
destruction or curtailment of the species' habitat or range, disease or
predation, or other natural or manmade factors threaten A. eggersiana
or S. conocarpum. After reviewing the best available scientific and
commercial information, we believe that we do not have sufficient
information to determine the true status of either Agave eggersiana or
Solanum conocarpum in the wild and cannot determine if either species
meets the definition of threatened or endangered due to one or more of
the five listing factors because we do not have sufficient evidence of
which threats, if any, are operating on these species.
We will continue to monitor the status of these species and their
habitats, and will accept additional information and comments at any
time from all concerned governmental agencies, the scientific
community, industry, and any other interested parties concerning this
finding. This information will help us monitor and encourage beneficial
measures for A. eggersiana and S. conocarpum.
References Cited
A complete list of all references cited herein is available upon
request from the Field Supervisor, Boquer[oacute]n Field Office (see
ADDRESSES section).
Author
The primary author of this document is the Boquer[oacute]n Field
Office (see ADDRESSES section).
Authority
The authority for this action is the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: February 22, 2006.
Marshall P. Jones, Jr.,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E6-3095 Filed 3-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P