North Baja Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Application, 10489-10490 [E6-2872]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 40 / Wednesday, March 1, 2006 / Notices
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–2868 Filed 2–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. RP06–200–001]
Entrega Gas Pipeline LLC; Notice of
Negotiated Rate
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–2867 Filed 2–28–06; 8:45 am]
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
February 22, 2006.
Take notice that on February 15, 2006,
Entrega Gas Pipeline LLC (Entrega)
pursuant to 18 CFR 154.7 and 154.203,
and in compliance with the
Commission’s letter order issued August
9, 2005, in Docket No. CP04–414–000,
tendered for filing and acceptance
certain tariff sheets of Original Volume
No. 1 of its FERC Gas Tariff to be
effective February 23, 2006.
Entrega states that a copy of this filing
has been served upon all parties to this
proceeding, Entrega’s customers, the
Colorado Public Utilities Commission
and the Wyoming Public Service
Commission.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Protests will be considered by
the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed in accordance
with the provisions of Section 154.210
of the Commission’s regulations (18 CFR
154.210). Anyone filing an intervention
or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone
filing an intervention or protest on or
before the intervention or protest date
need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the
Applicant.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:25 Feb 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket Nos. CP06–61–000; CP01–23–003]
North Baja Pipeline, LLC; Notice of
Application
February 21, 2006.
Take notice that on February 7, 2006,
North Baja Pipeline, LLC (North Baja),
1400 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 900,
Portland, Oregon 97201, filed in Docket
Nos. CP01–23–001 and CP06–61–00,
applications pursuant to sections 7 and
3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), for a
certificate of public convenience and
necessity authorizing the expansion of
North Baja’s existing interstate pipeline
system and an amendment to its
Presidential Permit to allow for the
construction of additional facilities at
the U.S.-Mexico border to accommodate
the importation of regassified LNG from
Mexico, all as more fully set forth in the
request which is on file with
Commission and open to public
inspection. The filing may also be
viewed on the Web at https://
www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link.
Enter the docket number excluding the
last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10489
free at (866) 208–3676, or TTY, contact
(202) 502–8659.
North Baja requests authority to
develop its expansion in three phases.
Specifically, in Phase I, anticipated inservice October 1, 2007, North Baja
seeks to:
(1) Modify its existing Ehrenburg
Compressor Station in La Paz County,
Arizona and Ogilby Meter Station in
Imperial County, California to facilitate
the bi-directional flow of gas;
(2) Construct a new meter station and
a 36-inch diameter pipeline
interconnection with the facilities of
Southern California Gas Company
(SoCalGas) at the proposed Blythe Meter
Station site in Riverside County,
California;
(3) Construct a new 42-inch diameter
pipeline crossing of the Colorado River
to connect the Ehrenberg Compressor
Station with the Blythe Meter Station;
and
(4) Construct the new 0.625 mile, 10inch diameter Blythe Energy
Interconnect Lateral to connect the
Blythe Energy Facility I’s existing
supply line with the Blythe Meter
Station.
North Baja states that the proposed
facility modifications and additions will
allow it to deliver up to 609,000 Dth per
day of regassified LNG into California
and Arizona from Mexico.
In Phase I–A, anticipated in-service
June 1, 2009, North Baja proposes to
construct and operate the 45.7 mile, 16inch diameter IID Lateral extending
westward from North Baja’s existing
pipeline through Imperial County,
California to the El Centro Generating
Station near El Centro California. North
Baja states that the IID Lateral will have
a capacity of 110,000 Dth per day.
In Phase II, anticipated in-service
January 1, 2010, North Baja proposes to
construct and operate about 80 miles of
48-inch and 42-inch diameter pipeline
loop, the B-Line, on its existing
mainline (A-Line) in Riverside and
Imperial Counties, California. North
Baja anticipates that upon completion of
the Phase II facilities the capacity of its
system will be 2.7 Bcf per day. North
Baja estimates that the total cost of all
phases of the proposed project will be
$291 million. North Baja proposes to
incrementally price transportation
service on the Blythe Energy
Interconnect Lateral and IID Lateral and
to roll-in the costs of the looping
facilities (Line B) into its existing rates.
Any questions regarding this
application should be directed to Carl
M. Fink, Associate General Counsel,
North Baja Pipeline, LLC, 1400 SW Fifth
Avenue, Suite 900, Portland, Oregon,
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
10490
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 40 / Wednesday, March 1, 2006 / Notices
97201 at (503) 833–4256 or
Carl_Fink@TransCanada.com.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the comment date
stated below, file with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)
and the Regulations under the NGA (18
CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list
maintained by the Secretary of the
Commission and will receive copies of
all documents filed by the applicant and
by all other parties. A party must submit
14 copies of filings made with the
Commission and must mail a copy to
the applicant and to every other party in
the proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
However, a person does not have to
intervene in order to have comments
considered. The second way to
participate is by filing with the
Secretary of the Commission, as soon as
possible, an original and two copies of
comments in support of or in opposition
to this project. The Commission will
consider these comments in
determining the appropriate action to be
taken, but the filing of a comment alone
will not serve to make the filer a party
to the proceeding. The Commission’s
rules require that persons filing
comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to
the party or parties directly involved in
the protest.
Persons who wish to comment only
on the environmental review of this
project should submit an original and
two copies of their comments to the
Secretary of the Commission.
Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission’s
environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents,
and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission’s
environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be
required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties.
However, the non-party commenters
will not receive copies of all documents
filed by other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the
Commission) and will not have the right
to seek court review of the
Commission’s final order.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:25 Feb 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
Comments, protests and interventions
may be filed electronically via the
Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions
on the Commission’s web site under the
‘‘e-Filing’’ link.
Comment Date: March 13, 2006.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–2872 Filed 2–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
authorization for a change in Eagle’s
ownership in which LBMB will acquire
limited partnership interests in Eagle
and limited liability company
membership interests in Eagle
Management. The Applicants have
requested privileged treatment of certain
information and documentation
submitted with the application.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on March 10, 2006.
4. Duquesne Conemaugh, LLC
[Docket No. EG06–28–000]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket Nos. EC05–122–000, et al.]
Vermont-Hydro-electric Power
Authority, et al.; Notice of Application
Take notice that on February 7, 2006,
Duquesne Conemaugh, LLC tendered for
filing additional information to its EWG
filing submitted on January 30, 2006.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on March 6, 2006.
5. KGen Enterprise LLC
February 23, 2006.
[Docket No. EG06–37–000]
The following filings have been made
with the Commission. The filings are
listed in ascending order within each
docket classification.
Take notice that on February 10, 2006,
KGen Enterprise LLC submitted a Notice
of Self-Recertification of Exempt
Wholesale Generator Status.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on March 3, 2006.
1. Vermont-Hydro-Electric Power
Authority
6. BlueRock Energy, Inc.
[Docket No. EC05–122–000]
Take notice that on February 13, 2006,
Vermont Hydro-electric Power
Authority tendered for filing a notice of
withdrawal for an Application under
section 203 of the Federal Power Act,
submitted on August 22, 2005.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on March 6, 2006.
[Docket No. ER06–606–001]
2. Liberty Electric Power, LLC
Take notice that on February 17, 2006,
BlueRock Energy, Inc. submitted an
amendment to their Petition for
Acceptance of Initial Rate Schedule,
Waivers and Blanket Authority filed
February 2, 2006.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on March 1, 2006.
[Docket No. EC06–11–000]
Standard Paragraph
Take notice that on February 16, 2006,
Liberty Electric Power, LLC (Liberty)
tendered for filing a supplement to their
October 21, 2005 Application by asking
for an additional 60-day period in order
to allow the parties to close the
Transaction on or before April 28, 2006.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on March 3, 2006.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed on or before the
comment date. Anyone filing a motion
to intervene or protest must serve a copy
of that document on the Applicant and
all the parties in this proceeding.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
3. Eagle Energy Partners I, L.P.; Eagle
Energy Management, LLC; LBMB
Partners AIV I, L.P.; LBMB Fund (B)
AIV I, L.P.; LBMB Fund AIV I, L.P.;
LBMB Capital Partners V AIV I, L.P.;
LB I Group Inc.
[Docket No. EC06–84–000]
Take notice that on February 17, 2006,
Eagle Energy Partners I, L.P., Eagle
Energy Management, LLC and LBMB
Partners AIV I, L.P. LBMB Fund (B) AIV
I, L.P., LBMB Fund AIV I, L.P., LBMB
Capital Partners V AIV I, L.P. and LB I
Group Inc (collectively, Applicants)
submitted an application pursuant to
section 203 of the Federal Power Act for
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10489-10490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-2872]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. CP06-61-000; CP01-23-003]
North Baja Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Application
February 21, 2006.
Take notice that on February 7, 2006, North Baja Pipeline, LLC
(North Baja), 1400 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 900, Portland, Oregon 97201,
filed in Docket Nos. CP01-23-001 and CP06-61-00, applications pursuant
to sections 7 and 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), for a certificate of
public convenience and necessity authorizing the expansion of North
Baja's existing interstate pipeline system and an amendment to its
Presidential Permit to allow for the construction of additional
facilities at the U.S.-Mexico border to accommodate the importation of
regassified LNG from Mexico, all as more fully set forth in the request
which is on file with Commission and open to public inspection. The
filing may also be viewed on the Web at https://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll free at (866) 208-3676, or TTY,
contact (202) 502-8659.
North Baja requests authority to develop its expansion in three
phases. Specifically, in Phase I, anticipated in-service October 1,
2007, North Baja seeks to:
(1) Modify its existing Ehrenburg Compressor Station in La Paz
County, Arizona and Ogilby Meter Station in Imperial County, California
to facilitate the bi-directional flow of gas;
(2) Construct a new meter station and a 36-inch diameter pipeline
interconnection with the facilities of Southern California Gas Company
(SoCalGas) at the proposed Blythe Meter Station site in Riverside
County, California;
(3) Construct a new 42-inch diameter pipeline crossing of the
Colorado River to connect the Ehrenberg Compressor Station with the
Blythe Meter Station; and
(4) Construct the new 0.625 mile, 10-inch diameter Blythe Energy
Interconnect Lateral to connect the Blythe Energy Facility I's existing
supply line with the Blythe Meter Station.
North Baja states that the proposed facility modifications and
additions will allow it to deliver up to 609,000 Dth per day of
regassified LNG into California and Arizona from Mexico.
In Phase I-A, anticipated in-service June 1, 2009, North Baja
proposes to construct and operate the 45.7 mile, 16-inch diameter IID
Lateral extending westward from North Baja's existing pipeline through
Imperial County, California to the El Centro Generating Station near El
Centro California. North Baja states that the IID Lateral will have a
capacity of 110,000 Dth per day.
In Phase II, anticipated in-service January 1, 2010, North Baja
proposes to construct and operate about 80 miles of 48-inch and 42-inch
diameter pipeline loop, the B-Line, on its existing mainline (A-Line)
in Riverside and Imperial Counties, California. North Baja anticipates
that upon completion of the Phase II facilities the capacity of its
system will be 2.7 Bcf per day. North Baja estimates that the total
cost of all phases of the proposed project will be $291 million. North
Baja proposes to incrementally price transportation service on the
Blythe Energy Interconnect Lateral and IID Lateral and to roll-in the
costs of the looping facilities (Line B) into its existing rates.
Any questions regarding this application should be directed to Carl
M. Fink, Associate General Counsel, North Baja Pipeline, LLC, 1400 SW
Fifth Avenue, Suite 900, Portland, Oregon,
[[Page 10490]]
97201 at (503) 833-4256 or Carl--Fink@TransCanada.com.
There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's web site under the ``e-Filing''
link.
Comment Date: March 13, 2006.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-2872 Filed 2-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P