Safety and Health-Alternate I to Major Breach of Safety or Security Clause, 8989-8990 [06-1572]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
the changes. See 69 FR 77976, December
29, 2004. Channel 248C is reallotted at
Mont Belvieu at Station KRWP(FM)’s
license site 50.1 kilometers (31.1 miles)
east of the community at coordinates
29–41–52 NL and 94–24–09 WL.
DATES:
Federal Communications
Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
Victoria M. McCauley, Media Bureau,
(202) 418–2180.
This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Report
and Order, MB Docket No. 04–426
adopted February 2, 2006, and released
February 6, 2006. The full text of this
Commission decision is available for
inspection and copying during regular
business hours at the FCC’s Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445
Twelfth Street, SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. The complete
text of this decision may also be
purchased from the Commission’s
duplicating contractor, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20054,
telephone 1–800–378–3160 or https://
www.BCPIWEB.com. The Commission
will send a copy of this Report and
Order in a report to be sent to Congress
and the Government Accountability
Office pursuant to the Congressional
Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Radio, Radio broadcasting.
47 CFR part 73 is amended as follows:
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.
[Amended]
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM
Allotments under Texas, is amended by
removing Channel 248C1 at Beaumont
and adding Mont Belvieu, Channel
248C.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
I
Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 06–1526 Filed 2–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Feb 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
RIN 2700–AD12
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
§ 73.202
48 CFR Parts 1823 and 1852
Safety and Health—Alternate I to Major
Breach of Safety or Security Clause
Effective March 23, 2006.
ADDRESSES:
I
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
SUMMARY: This rule adopts as final, with
a minor editorial change, the proposed
rule published in the Federal Register
(70 FR 33726–33727) on June 9, 2005.
This final rule amends the NASA FAR
Supplement (NFS) to add Alternate I to
the ‘‘Major Breach of Safety or Security’’
clause. Alternate I deletes references to
termination for default and makes other
changes to be consistent with the FAR
termination clauses prescribed for use
with educational or nonprofit
institutions performing research and
development work on a nonprofit or nofee basis, and in contracts for
commercial items.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 22, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
Weber, Office of Procurement, Contract
Management Division, (202) 358–1784,
e-mail: carl.c.weber@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
Since July 13, 2000, NFS has required
the Major Breach of Safety or Security
clause (1852.223–75) in new
solicitations and contracts with an
estimated value over $500,000. The
clause declares the Government’s right
to terminate for default in the event of
a major breach of safety or security.
However, contracts for commercial
items procured under FAR Part 12 and
certain contracts with educational or
nonprofit institutions do not provide the
Government the right to terminate for
‘‘default’’. Commercial contracts
provide rights to terminate for
convenience and ‘‘cause’’, and contracts
with educational or nonprofit
institutions provide the right to
terminate for convenience.
NASA Procurement Information
Circular (PIC 02–11) issued June 24,
2002, provided a class deviation to use
an Alternate I to the clause, which
deleted references to termination for
default, under certain circumstances.
This final rule adds the Alternate I to
the Major Breach of Safety or Security
clause at 1852.223–75, eliminating the
need for PIC 02–11 and the class
deviation. Use of the clause with its
Alternate I in contracts for commercial
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8989
items procured under FAR Part 12, and
contracts for research and development
work with educational or nonprofit
institutions on a nonprofit or no-fee
basis will be consistent with FAR
termination clauses prescribed for use
in such contracts. NASA published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register
(70 FR 33726–33727) on June 9, 2005.
No comments were received, and the
proposed rule is being adopted with a
minor editorial change to
1823.7001(d)(2)(ii) that simplifies the
clause prescription to require it when
FAR 52.212–4 is included in a
solicitation or contract. This is not a
significant regulatory action, and
therefore, is not subject to Office of
Management and Budget review under
section 6(b), of Executive Order 12866,
dated September 30, 1993. This is not a
major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
NASA certifies that this final rule
does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities with the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq., since it only clarifies agency
regulations so they are employed
consistently with FAR termination
provisions.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the changes do not
impose any new recordkeeping or
information collection requirements
which require the approval of the Office
of Management and Budget under 44
U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1823
and 1852
Government Procurement.
Tom Luedtke,
Assistant Administrator for Procurement.
Accordingly, 48 CFR parts 1823 and
1852 are amended as follows:
I
PART 1823—ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY
AND WATER EFFICIENCY,
RENEWABLE ENERGY
TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL
SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE
WORKPLACE
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 1823 and 1852 continues to read
as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2473(c)(1).
2. Amend section 1823.7001 by
revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
I
1823.7001 NASA solicitation provisions
and contract clauses.
*
E:\FR\FM\22FER1.SGM
*
*
22FER1
*
*
8990
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(d)(1) The contracting officer shall
insert the clause at 1852.223–75, Major
Breach of Safety or Security, in all
solicitations and contracts with
estimated values of $500,000 or more,
unless waived at a level above the
contracting officer with the concurrence
of the project manager and the
installation official(s) responsible for
matters of security, export control,
safety, and occupational health.
(2) Insert the clause with its Alternate
I if—
(i) The solicitation or contract is with
an educational or other nonprofit
institution and contains the termination
clause at FAR 52.249–5; or
(ii) The solicitation or contract is for
commercial items and contains the
clause at FAR 52.212–4.
(3) For contracts with estimated
values below $500,000, use of the clause
is optional.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 1852—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) or by a state
agency operating under an OSHA
approved plan.
(b) Security is the condition of
safeguarding against espionage,
sabotage, crime (including computer
crime), or attack. A major breach of
security may constitute a breach of
contract that entitles the Government to
exercise any of its rights and remedies
applicable to material parts of this
contract, including termination. A major
breach of security may occur on or off
Government installations, but must be
related directly to the work on the
contract. A major breach of security is
an act or omission by the Contractor that
results in compromise of classified
information, illegal technology transfer,
workplace violence resulting in criminal
conviction, sabotage, compromise or
denial of information technology
services, equipment or property damage
from vandalism greater than $250,000,
or theft greater than $250,000.
[FR Doc. 06–1572 Filed 2–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–01–P
3. Amend section 1852.223–75 by
adding Alternate I to read as follows:
I
1852.223–75
Security.
*
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Major Breach of Safety or
*
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
*
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Alternate I
50 CFR Parts 222 and 223
(FEB 2006)
As prescribed in 1823.7001(d)(2),
substitute the following paragraphs (a)
and (b) for paragraphs (a) and (b) of the
basic clause:
(a) Safety is the freedom from those
conditions that can cause death, injury,
occupational illness, damage to or loss
of equipment or property, or damage to
the environment. Safety is essential to
NASA and is a material part of this
contract. NASA’s safety priority is to
protect: (1) The public; (2) astronauts
and pilots; (3) the NASA workforce
(including contractor employees
working on NASA contracts); and (4)
high-value equipment and property. A
major breach of safety may constitute a
breach of contract that entitles the
Government to exercise any of its rights
and remedies applicable to material
parts of this contract, including
termination. A major breach of safety
must be related directly to the work on
the contract. A major breach of safety is
an act or omission of the Contractor that
consists of an accident, incident, or
exposure resulting in a fatality or
mission failure; or in damage to
equipment or property equal to or
greater than $1 million; or in any
‘‘willful’’ or ‘‘repeat’’ violation cited by
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:17 Feb 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
[Docket No. 050922245–6038–06; I.D.
020906A]
RIN 0648–AT89
Sea Turtle Conservation; Shrimp
Trawling Requirements
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues this 30–day
temporary rule to allow shrimp
fishermen to continue to use limited
tow times as an alternative to Turtle
Excluder Devices (TEDs) in inshore and
offshore waters from the Florida/
Alabama border, westward to the
Louisiana/Texas border, and extending
offshore 10 nautical miles. The previous
30–day variances of the TED
requirements were from September 23
through October 24, 2005; October 11
through November 10, 2005; October 24
through November 23, 2005; November
23 through December 23, 2005; and
from December 23, 2005, through
January 23, 2006, for waters affected by
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. These
variances were initially for 50 nautical
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
miles, while the most recent variance
was for 20 nautical miles. After an
investigation, the Alabama Department
of Conservation and Natural Resources
(ALDCNR), Mississippi Department of
Marine Resources (MDMR), and the
Louisiana Department of Wildlife and
Fisheries (LADWF) have determined
that excessive debris is still affecting
fishermen’s ability to use TEDs
effectively in an area extending
approximately 10 nm offshore. This
action is necessary because
environmental conditions resulting from
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita persist on
the fishing grounds, preventing some
fishermen from using TEDs effectively.
DATES: Effective from February 16, 2006
through 11:59 p.m, local time, March
20, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the
Environmental Assessment on this
action should be addressed to the Chief,
Marine Mammal Division, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Barnette, 727–551–5794.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
All sea turtles that occur in U.S.
waters are listed as either endangered or
threatened under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (ESA). The Kemp’s
ridley (Lepidochelys kempii),
leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), and
hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata)
turtles are listed as endangered. The
loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and green
(Chelonia mydas) turtles are listed as
threatened, except for breeding
populations of green turtles in Florida
and on the Pacific coast of Mexico,
which are listed as endangered.
Sea turtles are incidentally taken, and
some are killed, as a result of numerous
activities, including fishery-related
trawling activities in the Gulf of Mexico
and along the Atlantic seaboard. Under
the ESA and its implementing
regulations, the taking of sea turtles is
prohibited, with exceptions identified
in 50 CFR 223.206(d), or according to
the terms and conditions of a biological
opinion issued under section 7 of the
ESA, or according to an incidental take
permit issued under section 10 of the
ESA. The incidental taking of turtles
during shrimp or summer flounder
trawling is exempted from the taking
prohibition of section 9 of the ESA if the
conservation measures specified in the
sea turtle conservation regulations (50
CFR 223) are followed. The regulations
require most shrimp trawlers and
summer flounder trawlers operating in
E:\FR\FM\22FER1.SGM
22FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8989-8990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-1572]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1823 and 1852
RIN 2700-AD12
Safety and Health--Alternate I to Major Breach of Safety or
Security Clause
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule adopts as final, with a minor editorial change, the
proposed rule published in the Federal Register (70 FR 33726-33727) on
June 9, 2005. This final rule amends the NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) to
add Alternate I to the ``Major Breach of Safety or Security'' clause.
Alternate I deletes references to termination for default and makes
other changes to be consistent with the FAR termination clauses
prescribed for use with educational or nonprofit institutions
performing research and development work on a nonprofit or no-fee
basis, and in contracts for commercial items.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 22, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Weber, Office of Procurement,
Contract Management Division, (202) 358-1784, e-mail:
carl.c.weber@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
Since July 13, 2000, NFS has required the Major Breach of Safety or
Security clause (1852.223-75) in new solicitations and contracts with
an estimated value over $500,000. The clause declares the Government's
right to terminate for default in the event of a major breach of safety
or security. However, contracts for commercial items procured under FAR
Part 12 and certain contracts with educational or nonprofit
institutions do not provide the Government the right to terminate for
``default''. Commercial contracts provide rights to terminate for
convenience and ``cause'', and contracts with educational or nonprofit
institutions provide the right to terminate for convenience.
NASA Procurement Information Circular (PIC 02-11) issued June 24,
2002, provided a class deviation to use an Alternate I to the clause,
which deleted references to termination for default, under certain
circumstances.
This final rule adds the Alternate I to the Major Breach of Safety
or Security clause at 1852.223-75, eliminating the need for PIC 02-11
and the class deviation. Use of the clause with its Alternate I in
contracts for commercial items procured under FAR Part 12, and
contracts for research and development work with educational or
nonprofit institutions on a nonprofit or no-fee basis will be
consistent with FAR termination clauses prescribed for use in such
contracts. NASA published a proposed rule in the Federal Register (70
FR 33726-33727) on June 9, 2005. No comments were received, and the
proposed rule is being adopted with a minor editorial change to
1823.7001(d)(2)(ii) that simplifies the clause prescription to require
it when FAR 52.212-4 is included in a solicitation or contract. This is
not a significant regulatory action, and therefore, is not subject to
Office of Management and Budget review under section 6(b), of Executive
Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993. This is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
NASA certifies that this final rule does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities with the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., since
it only clarifies agency regulations so they are employed consistently
with FAR termination provisions.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes do
not impose any new recordkeeping or information collection requirements
which require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1823 and 1852
Government Procurement.
Tom Luedtke,
Assistant Administrator for Procurement.
0
Accordingly, 48 CFR parts 1823 and 1852 are amended as follows:
PART 1823--ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE
ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 1823 and 1852 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2473(c)(1).
0
2. Amend section 1823.7001 by revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
1823.7001 NASA solicitation provisions and contract clauses.
* * * * *
[[Page 8990]]
(d)(1) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.223-
75, Major Breach of Safety or Security, in all solicitations and
contracts with estimated values of $500,000 or more, unless waived at a
level above the contracting officer with the concurrence of the project
manager and the installation official(s) responsible for matters of
security, export control, safety, and occupational health.
(2) Insert the clause with its Alternate I if--
(i) The solicitation or contract is with an educational or other
nonprofit institution and contains the termination clause at FAR
52.249-5; or
(ii) The solicitation or contract is for commercial items and
contains the clause at FAR 52.212-4.
(3) For contracts with estimated values below $500,000, use of the
clause is optional.
* * * * *
PART 1852--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
3. Amend section 1852.223-75 by adding Alternate I to read as follows:
1852.223-75 Major Breach of Safety or Security.
* * * * *
Alternate I
(FEB 2006)
As prescribed in 1823.7001(d)(2), substitute the following
paragraphs (a) and (b) for paragraphs (a) and (b) of the basic clause:
(a) Safety is the freedom from those conditions that can cause
death, injury, occupational illness, damage to or loss of equipment or
property, or damage to the environment. Safety is essential to NASA and
is a material part of this contract. NASA's safety priority is to
protect: (1) The public; (2) astronauts and pilots; (3) the NASA
workforce (including contractor employees working on NASA contracts);
and (4) high-value equipment and property. A major breach of safety may
constitute a breach of contract that entitles the Government to
exercise any of its rights and remedies applicable to material parts of
this contract, including termination. A major breach of safety must be
related directly to the work on the contract. A major breach of safety
is an act or omission of the Contractor that consists of an accident,
incident, or exposure resulting in a fatality or mission failure; or in
damage to equipment or property equal to or greater than $1 million; or
in any ``willful'' or ``repeat'' violation cited by the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) or by a state agency operating
under an OSHA approved plan.
(b) Security is the condition of safeguarding against espionage,
sabotage, crime (including computer crime), or attack. A major breach
of security may constitute a breach of contract that entitles the
Government to exercise any of its rights and remedies applicable to
material parts of this contract, including termination. A major breach
of security may occur on or off Government installations, but must be
related directly to the work on the contract. A major breach of
security is an act or omission by the Contractor that results in
compromise of classified information, illegal technology transfer,
workplace violence resulting in criminal conviction, sabotage,
compromise or denial of information technology services, equipment or
property damage from vandalism greater than $250,000, or theft greater
than $250,000.
[FR Doc. 06-1572 Filed 2-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P