Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Commercial Fishing Operations; Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan (ALWTRP) and Endangered Species Conservation; Restriction of Fishing Activities, 8223-8227 [06-1490]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 32 / Thursday, February 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Commerce, certified to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration at the
proposed rule stage that this action
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Because the harvest of northern
fur seals on the Pribilof Islands, Alaska,
is for subsistence purposes only, the
estimate of subsistence need would not
have an economic effect on any small
entities. Therefore, a regulatory
flexibility analysis was not prepared.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not contain policies
with federalism implications sufficient
to warrant preparation of a federalism
assessment under E.O. 13132 because
this action does not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nonetheless,
NMFS worked closely with local
governments in the Pribilof Islands, and
these estimates of subsistence needs
were prepared by the local governments
in St. Paul and St. George, with
assistance from NMFS officials.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Executive Order 13175–Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments
E.O. 13175 requires that if NMFS
issues a regulation that significantly or
uniquely affects the communities of
Indian tribal governments and imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on
those communities, NMFS must consult
with those governments, or the Federal
government must provide the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by the tribal
governments. This action does not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on the communities of Indian
tribal governments. Nonetheless, NMFS
took several steps to work with affected
tribal governments to prepare and
implement the action. These steps
included discussions on subsistence
needs and mechanisms to ensure that
the harvest is conducted in a nonwasteful manner. NMFS signed
cooperative agreements with St. Paul in
2000 and with St. George in 2001
pursuant to section 119 of the MMPA.
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 224 and 229
RIN 0648–AU23
Executive Order 13132 – Federalism
12:31 Feb 15, 2006
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
[Docket No. 060213033–6033–01; I.D.
021006A]
This action does not require the
collection of information.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Dated: February 10, 2006.
William T. Hogarth,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 06–1434 Filed 2–15–06; 8:45 am]
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental
to Commercial Fishing Operations;
Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction
Plan (ALWTRP) and Endangered
Species Conservation; Restriction of
Fishing Activities
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Assistant Administrator
for Fisheries (AA), NOAA, announces
temporary restrictions on gillnet fishing
in the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area
through March 31, 2006, consistent with
the requirements of the ALWTRP’s
implementing regulations. NMFS is
taking this action based on its
determination that a right whale
mortality, documented on January 22,
2006, was the result of an entanglement
by gillnet gear within the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area. This action is necessary
to protect North Atlantic right whales
from further serious injury or mortality
from entanglement in gillnet gear in the
Southeast U.S. Restricted Area.
DATES: This action is effective from 0001
hours February 15, 2006 through 2400
hours March 31, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the
Environmental Assessment (EA)
prepared in association with this
temporary rule may be obtained from
the persons listed below under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vicki Cornish, 727–824–5312, Juan
Levesque, 727–824–5312, or Barb
Zoodsma, 904–321–2806.
Electronic Access: Regulations and
background documents for the ALWTRP
can be downloaded from the ALWTRP
Web site at https://www.nero.noaa.gov/
whaletrp/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8223
Background
The North Atlantic right whale
(Eubalaena glacialis) was severely
depleted by commercial whaling and
despite protection from commercial
harvest since 1935, has not recovered.
The population is believed to be at or
less than 300 individuals, making it one
of the most critically endangered large
whale species in the world (NMFS,
2005).
The North Atlantic right whale has
been listed as endangered under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) since the
ESA’s passage in 1973 (35 FR 8495, June
2, 1970). In June 1994, NMFS declared
three areas of the right whale’s range in
the United States as critical habitat: (1)
Great South Channel, (2) Cape Cod Bay,
and (3) the Southeastern U.S. (59 FR
28793, June 3, 1994). The Southeastern
U.S. critical habitat includes coastal
waters between 31°15′ N lat. and 30°15′
N lat. from the coast out 15 nautical
miles, and the coastal waters between
30°15′ N lat. and 28°00’ N lat. from the
coast out 5 nautical miles (50 CFR
226.203).
North Atlantic right whales occur in
coastal and nearshore waters off the
eastern United States and Canada, areas
also used by fishing and other maritime
activities that adversely affect the
species. Deaths from collisions with
ships and entanglement in fishing gear
are significant impediments to the
recovery of the species. From 1997 to
2001, human-caused mortality and
serious injury to North Atlantic right
whales from fishery entanglements and
ship strikes was estimated as an average
of 2.0 per year (Waring et al., 2003). A
serious injury has been defined as ‘‘any
injury that will likely result in
mortality’’ (50 CFR 216.3). Kraus et al.
(2005) indicated that the overall
mortality rate increased between 1980
and 1998 to a level of at least four
percent per year, a rate that is not
sustainable. The Potential Biological
Removal (PBR) level for right whales is
zero; thus, any mortality or serious
injury to the species is considered
significant.
The serious injury and mortality of
the right whale as a result of commercial
fishing activities continues to occur at a
rate above PBR (Waring et al., 2003).
Knowlton and Kraus (2001) documented
56 right whale human-related serious
injuries and deaths from 1970 to 1999,
with at least 31 attributed to
entanglements in fishing gear, for an
average of 1.0 mortalities and serious
injuries per year over that time period.
Cole et al. (2005) documented, for 1999–
2003, 31 reports of entanglements, 5
resulting in serious injuries and 3
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with RULES
8224
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 32 / Thursday, February 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
resulting in mortalities, for an average of
1.6 mortalities and serious injuries per
year over that time period.
NMFS criteria for determining
whether an entanglement of a right
whale is a serious injury (i.e., an injury
likely to result in the mortality of an
animal, when its actual fate is
unknown), include fishing line
constricting the tail flukes of the whale
(Cole et al., 2005). The same document
states that a whale is typically not
considered seriously injured if all
constricting lines are shed by the animal
or removed (presumably by an
experienced team of disentanglement
experts).
To reduce the incidental serious
injury and mortality of marine mammal
stocks in commercial fishing operations,
section 118(f) of the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA) directs NMFS to
develop and implement Take Reduction
Plans (TRP) to assist in the recovery or
prevent the depletion of each strategic
stock that interacts with a Category I or
II fishery, as defined and classified in
the annual List of Fisheries.
On August 6, 1996 (61 FR 40819),
NMFS established the Atlantic Large
Whale Take Reduction Team (ALWTRT)
to prepare a draft TRP to reduce the
incidental serious injury and mortality
of right, humpback, and fin whales in
commercial fishing operations, as well
as to provide conservation benefits to a
fourth, non-endangered species, the
minke whale. The ALWTRT submitted
a report to NMFS on February 1, 1997,
with recommendations to reduce the
serious injury and mortality of Atlantic
large whales; however, the ALWTRT
did not reach consensus on some
recommendations. NMFS then
developed a final TRP and
implementing regulations after
considerable public input. An interim
final rule was published on July 22,1997
(62 FR 39157), and a final rule was
published February 16, 1999 (64 FR
7529), with an April 1, 1999, effective
date. Since this time, the ALWTRP has
been modified several times to reduce
the serious injury and mortality of large
whales in commercial fisheries.
The ALWTRP, implemented through
regulations at 50 CFR 229.32, relies on
a combination of fishing gear
modifications, operational restrictions,
and time/area closures to reduce the risk
of large whales becoming entangled in
commercial fishing gear. NMFS
implemented specific management
measures for commercial fishing
operations in Southeast U.S. waters.
The Southeastern U.S. Restricted Area
is defined in 50 CFR 229.32(f)(1)(i) as
the waters from 32°00′ N. lat. (near
Savannah, GA) along the coast south to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:31 Feb 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
27°51′ N. lat. (near Sebastian Inlet, FL)
and extending from the shore eastward
out to 80°00′ W. long. The regulations
define the Southeast U.S. Observer Area
as the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area
plus an additional area along the coast
south to 26°46.5′ N. lat. (near West Palm
Beach, FL) and extending from the shore
eastward out to 80°00′ W. long. (50 CFR
229.32(f)(1)(ii)).
In the Southeast U.S. Observer Area,
the ALWTRP regulations mandate 100percent observer coverage of the
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet
fishery during the restricted period
(November 15 through March 31),
which corresponds with the right whale
calving season (50 CFR 229.32(f)(3)).
Additionally, fishermen are prohibited
from using shark gillnet gear, defined as
5-inches (0.127-m) or greater stretch
mesh (50 CFR 229.2), in the Southeast
U.S. Restricted Area during the
restricted period (November 15 through
March 31) (50 CFR 229.32(f)(4)(i)).
Shark gillnetting using strikenet gear is
allowed in the Southeast U.S. Restricted
Area as long as the following conditions
are met: (1) No nets are set at night or
when visibility is less than 500 yards
(460 m); (2) each set is made under the
observation of a spotter plane; (3) no net
is set within 3 nautical miles of a right,
humpback, or fin whale; and (4) if a
right, humpback, or fin whale moves
within 3 nautical miles of the set gear,
the gear is removed immediately from
the water (50 CFR 229.32(f)(4)(iv)).
Lastly, all gillnet fishermen are
prohibited from fishing a straight set of
gillnet gear at night within the
Southeastern U.S. Restricted Area
during the restricted period (November
15–March 31) (50 CFR 229.32(f)(4)(iii)).
Because of the right whale’s extremely
endangered status, NMFS included in
the ALWTRP regulations contingency
measures that would allow further
restriction on fishing in the Cape Cod
Bay critical habitat, Great South
Channel restricted area, and the
Southeast U.S. Restricted Area, if a right
whale mortality or serious injury
resulted from the use of certain fishing
gear in those areas. Specifically, 50 CFR
229.32(g)(1) states that if a serious injury
or mortality of a right whale occurs in
the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area from
November 15 through March 31 as a
result of an entanglement by gillnet gear
allowed to be used in that area and time,
the AA shall close that area to that gear
type for the rest of that time period and
for that same time period in each
subsequent year, unless the AA revises
the restricted period or implements
other measures.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Recent Events
On Sunday, January 22, 2006, at 10:30
a.m., a report was made to the United
States Coast Guard by a member of the
public that a floating whale had been
spotted offshore of Jacksonville Beach,
Florida. At approximately 11 a.m., a
Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission
(FWC) aerial survey team confirmed the
whale species and location and
photographed the carcass. The aerial
survey team identified the whale as a
right whale calf, and photos indicated
the calf as having one large wound
along the midline and smaller lesions
around the base of its tail. The right
whale calf was towed to shore that
evening from the location of 30°14.4′ N.
lat., 81°04.2′ W. long., which was
approximately 1 nautical mile outside of
designated right whale critical habitat,
but within the Southeast U.S. Restricted
Area.
Each year NMFS coordinates an
extensive aerial survey effort in the
Southeast U.S. right whale critical
habitat area from December 1 through
March 31. The New England
Aquarium’s right whale survey
photograph database was consulted to
determine the sighting history for the
dead calf. On Friday, December 30,
2005, the calf and its mother were
sighted together off St. Catherines
Island, Georgia. The calf did not show
evidence of entanglement at the time.
On January 8 and 9, 2006, the pair were
sighted off the mouth of Nassau Sound,
Florida and Cumberland Sound,
Georgia, respectively. By that time, the
aerial survey photographs suggested the
calf had linear scars, consistent with
some type of entanglement event. The
pair was last observed together off
Jacksonville Beach, Florida, on
Wednesday, January 11, 2006. On
Saturday, January 21, 2006, the calf’s
mother was observed, without the calf,
near the area where the dead calf was
recovered the following day. The adult
female right whale was observed
breaching, blowing bubbles, diving and
surface swimming, which may have
been signs of agitated behavior. The
calf’s carcass was found and reported on
January 22, 2006, approximately 16
nautical miles off Jacksonville Beach,
Florida. Based on the condition of the
whale when necropsied and local
surface water temperatures, the
investigators conclude that this animal
died within 3 to 6 days prior to
necropsy. An analysis of local wind and
water currents prior to January 22
indicated that the winds were west to
northwest, placing the location where
the calf most likely died as inshore and
north of where the carcass was found.
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 32 / Thursday, February 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
NMFS has determined that both the
entanglement and death of the whale
occurred within the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area for the following
reasons: (1) All sightings of this calf
occurred within the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area; (2) all the southeast
sightings were recent; (3) mother-calf
pairs typically remain on the calving
grounds in January; (4) the carcass was
found within the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area; and (5) the calf’s most
likely location when it died was inshore
and north of where the carcass was
found.
On Monday, January 23, 2006, at 7:15
a.m., a specialized large whale necropsy
team, which consisted of various
Federal and state government
representatives, and university and nonprofit marine mammal specialists,
performed a thorough necropsy of the
whale. This consisted of measuring,
photographing, dissecting, and
collecting tissues samples of the animal
in order to determine the possible cause
of death. The necropsy team’s gross
examination indicated a variety of
lesions including numerous small
lesions around the tailstock and a single
large dorsal lesion. The whale had a
complex array of wounds around its
tailstock. Two wounds were bites from
a small shark. Those wounds had been
seen in aerial photos of the calf as early
as December 30, 2005. Most of the
remaining wounds formed straight-line,
vee-, and diamond-shaped patterns.
These small lesions appeared to be premortem and caused by a fine cutting
edge such as monofilament net, which
would also correspond to the
characteristic vee and diamond shapes
of gillnet gear. There was also some
post-mortem scavenging by sharks. The
whale had a large wound splitting open
most of its back. The wound appeared
to have occurred post-mortem and was
not the result of a vessel strike. The
edges of the middle of the wound were
clean-cut, while the ends were ragged.
A notable observation by the necropsy
team was that cyamids had migrated to
the tailstock, indicating significant
injury to this area which may have
impeded the animal’s ability to swim
and dive. The necropsy team also noted
that the blubber thickness would
suggest the animal was in good body
condition, but, based on its empty
gastrointestinal track, it had not been
able to nurse for at least a day prior to
its death.
The immediate cause of death of the
whale (e.g., drowning, dehydration,
infection) has not been determined and
may never be completely known.
However, all available evidence suggests
the entanglement and injury of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:31 Feb 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
whale by gillnet gear ultimately led to
the death of the animal. The evidence of
recent entanglement was clearly
documented by the necropsy team. The
degree of entanglement meets NMFS’
criteria of a serious injury (i.e., an injury
likely to result in mortality). While there
was no entangling gear on the animal at
the time it was reported, NMFS knows
it was not removed through permitted
disentanglement efforts, and NMFS
believes that the calf did not disentangle
itself as it was young and not expected
to be strong enough to shed the
imbedded gear. Therefore, based on the
results of the necropsy, the New
England Aquarium’s aerial survey
database, evidence of gillnet fisheries
operating in the area (see Affected
Fisheries), and in the absence of other
significant explanatory findings, NMFS
has determined that the right whale
mortality, which occurred on January
22, 2006, was as a result of
entanglement in gillnet gear.
Closure of Southeast U.S. Restricted
Area to Gillnet Fisheries
NMFS has evaluated the recent right
whale mortality event and determined
that the criteria specified in 50 CFR
229.32(g)(1) for taking additional action
to protect right whales from further
serious injury or mortality, under the
ALWTRP, have been met. NMFS has
determined that the mortality of this
right whale was due to entanglement in
gillnet gear, and that the entanglement
occurred within the Southeastern U.S.
Restricted Area. Thus, NMFS believes
that closing the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area to all gillnet gear
through the remainder of the restricted
period, through March 31, 2006, is
warranted and urgent. Therefore, the
AA announces that all fishing with
gillnets is prohibited in the Southeast
U.S. Restricted Area, beginning at 0001
hours February 15, 2006 through 2400
hours March 31, 2006. All such gillnets
that are currently set must be retrieved
by 11:59 p.m on February 15, 2006.
Since existing ALWTRP rules already
prohibit gillnet fishing at night, except
for run-around sets, which are tended
sets, there is no need to provide any
extended delay in effectiveness to allow
fishermen to retrieve set gear.
This restriction will be announced to
state officials, fishermen, ALWTRT
members, and other interested parties
through e-mail, phone contact, NOAA
Web site, and other appropriate media
immediately upon filing with the
Federal Register.
The regulations at 50 CFR 229.32(g)(1)
also requires the AA to close the
Southeast U.S. Restricted Area for the
rest of the time period, and for the time
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8225
period November 15 through March 31
in each subsequent year, unless the AA
revises the restricted period or unless
other measures are implemented. NMFS
plans to seek assistance and
recommendations from the ALWTRT at
their next meeting in order to evaluate
whether permanent closures within the
Southeast U.S. Restricted Area are
necessary.
Affected Gillnet Fisheries
In Southeast Atlantic waters,
commercial fishermen target various
finfish and shark species using gillnet
gear of varied sizes and deployment
techniques. Fisheries expected to be
affected by this rulemaking include, but
are not limited to, the Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic shark gillnet fishery and the
Southeast Atlantic gillnet fishery.
The Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark
gillnet fishery uses 5-inch (0.127 m) or
greater stretch mesh gillnet gear,
typically targeting various shark species.
NMFS believes there are approximately
six to eight active vessels in this fishery.
The FWC’s trip ticket database (2002–
2005) for counties within the Southeast
U.S. Restricted Area (Nassau, Duval, St.
John’s, Flagler, Volusia, and Brevard)
indicates that overall shark landings,
number of trips, and the dollar value of
this fishery, has been declining since
2002 within this area. In 2005, there was
a total of 280,235 pounds (127,113 kg)
of sharks landed, which corresponded
to 180 trips and a value of $180,015.
Although the Southeast U.S. Restricted
Area consists of Florida and Georgia
waters, landings information was only
obtained from Florida since landings
from gillnet gear are prohibited in the
State of Georgia. This fishery is
managed by the NMFS Office of
Sustainable Fisheries, Highly Migratory
Species Division.
The Southeast Atlantic gillnet fishery
typically uses smaller mesh gillnet gear,
less than 5-inch stretch mesh, targeting
mostly coastal migratory species (King
mackerel, Spanish mackerel, whiting,
and bluefish). Based on the FWC’s trip
ticket database for 2005, NMFS believes
that approximately 56 individuals
participate in this fishery annually. Data
from the same database for 2002–2005
for counties within the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area indicate that overall
finfish landings (excluding whiting; see
below), number of trips, and the value
of the fishery has been decreasing since
2002 for fishermen targeting finfish with
gillnets in this area. For 2005, there was
a total of 153,905 pounds (69,810 kg) of
finfish landed, which corresponded to
978 trips and a value of $129,454. As
stated above, the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area consists of Florida and
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with RULES
8226
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 32 / Thursday, February 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Georgia waters, but landings
information was only obtained from
Florida since landings from gillnet gear
are prohibited in the State of Georgia.
Florida gillnet finfish landings have
been dominated by the following
species: bluefish, Spanish mackerel,
cobia, and King mackerel. These species
are managed by NMFS and the South
Atlantic Regional Fishery Management
Council.
NMFS has also become aware of
recent increases in fishing activity by
fishermen specifically using sink gillnet
gear of various mesh size targeting
demersal finfish, primarily whiting
(Menticirrhus americanus). In contrast
to the above landings information, the
FWC’s trip ticket database (2002–2005)
for counties within the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area indicates that overall
finfish landings, number of trips, and
the value of demersal finfish landings
have been increasing since 2002, mostly
from fishermen targeting whiting with
gillnets in this area. NMFS is unaware
how many participants fish for demersal
finfish using only sink gillnet gear, since
catches from all gillnet gear are
combined in the trip ticket database. For
2005, there was a total of 461,858
pounds (209,495 kg) of whiting landed,
which corresponded to 589 trips and a
value of $363,960. Again, the Southeast
U.S. Restricted Area consists of Florida
and Georgia waters; however, landings
information was only obtained from
Florida since landings from gillnet gear
are prohibited in the State of Georgia. At
this time, the South Atlantic Regional
Fishery Management Council does not
prohibit the use of gillnets within the
southeast Exclusive Economic Zone
waters for non-FMP species (50 CFR
600.725). Thus, fishermen who target
whiting are not regulated by a FMP,
because currently this species is not
managed under the Coastal Migratory
FMP or any other FMP.
The above-mentioned estimates for
the total value of the gillnet fisheries
operating in the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area are based on
preliminary total annual landings for
2005. FWC’s trip ticket data for counties
within the Southeast U.S. Restricted
Area for the past six years (2000–2005)
during the months of February and
March, indicate an average of 15
fishermen fish in these areas during the
months that will be affected by this
temporary closure. Total economic
losses during February and March 2006
were projected, based on the combined
average total landings and average total
revenues from gillnet fishing in these
three areas, and are estimated at 92,687
pounds and $74,364.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:31 Feb 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
Additional Conservation Measures
The AA may withdraw or modify any
additional restriction on fishing
activities if the AA determines that such
action is warranted. Notification of any
additional, modified, or suspended right
whale conservation measures will be
published in the Federal Register
pursuant to 50 CFR 229.32(g)(1) or (2).
NMFS will continue to monitor right
whale serious injuries and mortalities to
gauge the effectiveness of these
conservation measures. In addition,
although the ALWTRT recommended
additional measures to further protect
right whales from serious injury and
mortality in commercial fishing
operations in southeast waters during
2005 and NMFS published a proposed
rule on June 21, 2005 (70 FR 35894),
NMFS believes that, at this time,
because of the recent entanglement
event and the current level of
commercial gillnet fishing operations in
Southeast waters, NMFS plans to seek
assistance and recommendations from
the ALWTRT at their next meeting in
order to evaluate whether permanent
closures within the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area are necessary in
addition to the recently proposed
measures.
Literature Cited
Knowlton, A.R. and S.D. Kraus. 2001.
Mortality and serious injury of North
Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena
glacialis) in the North Atlantic Ocean. J.
Cetacean Res. Manage. (Special Issue) 2
(in press).
Kraus, S.D., M.W. Brown, H. Caswell, C.W.
Clark, M. Fujiwara, P.K. Hamilton, R.D.
Kenney, A.R. Knowlton, S. Landry, C.A.
Mayo, W.A. McLellan, M.J. Moore, D.P.
Nowacek, D.A. Pabst, A.J. Read, R.M.
Rolland. 2005. North Atlantic Right
Whales in Crisis. Science 22 July 2005:
Vol. 309. no. 5734, pp. 561–562.
NMFS. 2005. Recovery Plan for the North
Atlantic Right Whale (Eubalaena
glacialis). National Marine Fisheries
Service, Silver Spring, MD.
Waring, G., R. Pace, J. Quintal, C. Fairfield
and K. Maze-Foley. 2003. U.S. Atlantic
and Gulf of Mexico Marine Mammal
Stock Assessments—2003. NOAA Tech.
Mem. NMFS–NE–182. 260 pp.
Classification
In accordance with section 118(f)(9) of
the MMPA, the AA has determined that
this action is necessary to implement a
take reduction plan to protect North
Atlantic right whales. In addition,
pursuant to section 11(f) of the ESA, the
AA may promulgate regulations to
enforce the ESA’s prohibitions on the
taking of endangered right whales.
An Environmental Assessment for
this action was prepared and is
available from the agency upon request.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Providing prior notice and
opportunity for comment on this action
would be impracticable because it
would prevent NMFS from
implementing timely measures,
pursuant to regulations at 50 U.S.C.
229(g)(1), to immediately reduce the risk
of further serious injury and mortality of
endangered right whales. If this action
were to be subject to the notice and
comment rulemaking requirements of 5
U.S.C. 553, NMFS would not be able to
assert these regulatory protections to
endangered right whales because the
rulemaking would not be concluded
until some time beyond the end of the
protection period. In order to ensure
that right whales are protected during
the restricted period, the AA finds that
good cause exists, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), to waive prior notice and an
opportunity to comment on this action
to implement a commercial gillnet
fishing closure within the Southeast
U.S. Restricted Area to reduce the risk
of entanglement of endangered right
whales in commercial gillnet gear.
For the same reasons, the AA finds
that, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), good
cause exists to waive the 30-day delay
in effective date. If NMFS were to delay
for 30 days the effective date of this
action, right whales would be
vulnerable to entanglement, which
could result in further serious injury
and mortality.
NMFS determined that this action is
consistent to the maximum extent
practicable with the enforceable policies
of the approved coastal management
programs of Georgia and Florida. This
determination was submitted on
February 3, 2006, for review by the
responsible state agencies under section
307 of the CZMA.
The rule implementing the
commercial gillnet fishing closure
within the Southeastern U.S. Restricted
Area has been determined not to be
significant under Executive Order (E.O.)
12866.
This temporary rule is exempt from
the procedures of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act because the rule is issued
without prior notice and opportunity for
public comment.
NMFS believes this temporary rule
does not contain policies with
federalism implications under E.O.
13132, since the state waters affected
already prohibit gillneting under state
law; however, full consultation with the
states was not practicable for this action
pursuant to section 6 of E.O. 13132.
This action does not contain a
collection-of-information requirement
for purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 32 / Thursday, February 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq., 16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq., and 50 CFR 229.32(g)(1).
Dated: February 13, 2006.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Operations, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–1490 Filed 2–13–06; 3:56 pm]
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with RULES
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:31 Feb 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
8227
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8223-8227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-1490]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Parts 224 and 229
[Docket No. 060213033-6033-01; I.D. 021006A]
RIN 0648-AU23
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Commercial Fishing
Operations; Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan (ALWTRP) and
Endangered Species Conservation; Restriction of Fishing Activities
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries (AA), NOAA,
announces temporary restrictions on gillnet fishing in the Southeast
U.S. Restricted Area through March 31, 2006, consistent with the
requirements of the ALWTRP's implementing regulations. NMFS is taking
this action based on its determination that a right whale mortality,
documented on January 22, 2006, was the result of an entanglement by
gillnet gear within the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area. This action is
necessary to protect North Atlantic right whales from further serious
injury or mortality from entanglement in gillnet gear in the Southeast
U.S. Restricted Area.
DATES: This action is effective from 0001 hours February 15, 2006
through 2400 hours March 31, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Environmental Assessment (EA) prepared in
association with this temporary rule may be obtained from the persons
listed below under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicki Cornish, 727-824-5312, Juan
Levesque, 727-824-5312, or Barb Zoodsma, 904-321-2806.
Electronic Access: Regulations and background documents for the
ALWTRP can be downloaded from the ALWTRP Web site at https://
www.nero.noaa.gov/whaletrp/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) was severely
depleted by commercial whaling and despite protection from commercial
harvest since 1935, has not recovered. The population is believed to be
at or less than 300 individuals, making it one of the most critically
endangered large whale species in the world (NMFS, 2005).
The North Atlantic right whale has been listed as endangered under
the Endangered Species Act (ESA) since the ESA's passage in 1973 (35 FR
8495, June 2, 1970). In June 1994, NMFS declared three areas of the
right whale's range in the United States as critical habitat: (1) Great
South Channel, (2) Cape Cod Bay, and (3) the Southeastern U.S. (59 FR
28793, June 3, 1994). The Southeastern U.S. critical habitat includes
coastal waters between 31[deg]15' N lat. and 30[deg]15' N lat. from the
coast out 15 nautical miles, and the coastal waters between 30[deg]15'
N lat. and 28[deg]00' N lat. from the coast out 5 nautical miles (50
CFR 226.203).
North Atlantic right whales occur in coastal and nearshore waters
off the eastern United States and Canada, areas also used by fishing
and other maritime activities that adversely affect the species. Deaths
from collisions with ships and entanglement in fishing gear are
significant impediments to the recovery of the species. From 1997 to
2001, human-caused mortality and serious injury to North Atlantic right
whales from fishery entanglements and ship strikes was estimated as an
average of 2.0 per year (Waring et al., 2003). A serious injury has
been defined as ``any injury that will likely result in mortality'' (50
CFR 216.3). Kraus et al. (2005) indicated that the overall mortality
rate increased between 1980 and 1998 to a level of at least four
percent per year, a rate that is not sustainable. The Potential
Biological Removal (PBR) level for right whales is zero; thus, any
mortality or serious injury to the species is considered significant.
The serious injury and mortality of the right whale as a result of
commercial fishing activities continues to occur at a rate above PBR
(Waring et al., 2003). Knowlton and Kraus (2001) documented 56 right
whale human-related serious injuries and deaths from 1970 to 1999, with
at least 31 attributed to entanglements in fishing gear, for an average
of 1.0 mortalities and serious injuries per year over that time period.
Cole et al. (2005) documented, for 1999-2003, 31 reports of
entanglements, 5 resulting in serious injuries and 3
[[Page 8224]]
resulting in mortalities, for an average of 1.6 mortalities and serious
injuries per year over that time period.
NMFS criteria for determining whether an entanglement of a right
whale is a serious injury (i.e., an injury likely to result in the
mortality of an animal, when its actual fate is unknown), include
fishing line constricting the tail flukes of the whale (Cole et al.,
2005). The same document states that a whale is typically not
considered seriously injured if all constricting lines are shed by the
animal or removed (presumably by an experienced team of disentanglement
experts).
To reduce the incidental serious injury and mortality of marine
mammal stocks in commercial fishing operations, section 118(f) of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) directs NMFS to develop and
implement Take Reduction Plans (TRP) to assist in the recovery or
prevent the depletion of each strategic stock that interacts with a
Category I or II fishery, as defined and classified in the annual List
of Fisheries.
On August 6, 1996 (61 FR 40819), NMFS established the Atlantic
Large Whale Take Reduction Team (ALWTRT) to prepare a draft TRP to
reduce the incidental serious injury and mortality of right, humpback,
and fin whales in commercial fishing operations, as well as to provide
conservation benefits to a fourth, non-endangered species, the minke
whale. The ALWTRT submitted a report to NMFS on February 1, 1997, with
recommendations to reduce the serious injury and mortality of Atlantic
large whales; however, the ALWTRT did not reach consensus on some
recommendations. NMFS then developed a final TRP and implementing
regulations after considerable public input. An interim final rule was
published on July 22,1997 (62 FR 39157), and a final rule was published
February 16, 1999 (64 FR 7529), with an April 1, 1999, effective date.
Since this time, the ALWTRP has been modified several times to reduce
the serious injury and mortality of large whales in commercial
fisheries.
The ALWTRP, implemented through regulations at 50 CFR 229.32,
relies on a combination of fishing gear modifications, operational
restrictions, and time/area closures to reduce the risk of large whales
becoming entangled in commercial fishing gear. NMFS implemented
specific management measures for commercial fishing operations in
Southeast U.S. waters.
The Southeastern U.S. Restricted Area is defined in 50 CFR
229.32(f)(1)(i) as the waters from 32[deg]00' N. lat. (near Savannah,
GA) along the coast south to 27[deg]51' N. lat. (near Sebastian Inlet,
FL) and extending from the shore eastward out to 80[deg]00' W. long.
The regulations define the Southeast U.S. Observer Area as the
Southeast U.S. Restricted Area plus an additional area along the coast
south to 26[deg]46.5' N. lat. (near West Palm Beach, FL) and extending
from the shore eastward out to 80[deg]00' W. long. (50 CFR
229.32(f)(1)(ii)).
In the Southeast U.S. Observer Area, the ALWTRP regulations mandate
100-percent observer coverage of the Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark
gillnet fishery during the restricted period (November 15 through March
31), which corresponds with the right whale calving season (50 CFR
229.32(f)(3)). Additionally, fishermen are prohibited from using shark
gillnet gear, defined as 5-inches (0.127-m) or greater stretch mesh (50
CFR 229.2), in the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area during the restricted
period (November 15 through March 31) (50 CFR 229.32(f)(4)(i)). Shark
gillnetting using strikenet gear is allowed in the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area as long as the following conditions are met: (1) No
nets are set at night or when visibility is less than 500 yards (460
m); (2) each set is made under the observation of a spotter plane; (3)
no net is set within 3 nautical miles of a right, humpback, or fin
whale; and (4) if a right, humpback, or fin whale moves within 3
nautical miles of the set gear, the gear is removed immediately from
the water (50 CFR 229.32(f)(4)(iv)). Lastly, all gillnet fishermen are
prohibited from fishing a straight set of gillnet gear at night within
the Southeastern U.S. Restricted Area during the restricted period
(November 15-March 31) (50 CFR 229.32(f)(4)(iii)).
Because of the right whale's extremely endangered status, NMFS
included in the ALWTRP regulations contingency measures that would
allow further restriction on fishing in the Cape Cod Bay critical
habitat, Great South Channel restricted area, and the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area, if a right whale mortality or serious injury resulted
from the use of certain fishing gear in those areas. Specifically, 50
CFR 229.32(g)(1) states that if a serious injury or mortality of a
right whale occurs in the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area from November
15 through March 31 as a result of an entanglement by gillnet gear
allowed to be used in that area and time, the AA shall close that area
to that gear type for the rest of that time period and for that same
time period in each subsequent year, unless the AA revises the
restricted period or implements other measures.
Recent Events
On Sunday, January 22, 2006, at 10:30 a.m., a report was made to
the United States Coast Guard by a member of the public that a floating
whale had been spotted offshore of Jacksonville Beach, Florida. At
approximately 11 a.m., a Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission (FWC)
aerial survey team confirmed the whale species and location and
photographed the carcass. The aerial survey team identified the whale
as a right whale calf, and photos indicated the calf as having one
large wound along the midline and smaller lesions around the base of
its tail. The right whale calf was towed to shore that evening from the
location of 30[deg]14.4' N. lat., 81[deg]04.2' W. long., which was
approximately 1 nautical mile outside of designated right whale
critical habitat, but within the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area.
Each year NMFS coordinates an extensive aerial survey effort in the
Southeast U.S. right whale critical habitat area from December 1
through March 31. The New England Aquarium's right whale survey
photograph database was consulted to determine the sighting history for
the dead calf. On Friday, December 30, 2005, the calf and its mother
were sighted together off St. Catherines Island, Georgia. The calf did
not show evidence of entanglement at the time. On January 8 and 9,
2006, the pair were sighted off the mouth of Nassau Sound, Florida and
Cumberland Sound, Georgia, respectively. By that time, the aerial
survey photographs suggested the calf had linear scars, consistent with
some type of entanglement event. The pair was last observed together
off Jacksonville Beach, Florida, on Wednesday, January 11, 2006. On
Saturday, January 21, 2006, the calf's mother was observed, without the
calf, near the area where the dead calf was recovered the following
day. The adult female right whale was observed breaching, blowing
bubbles, diving and surface swimming, which may have been signs of
agitated behavior. The calf's carcass was found and reported on January
22, 2006, approximately 16 nautical miles off Jacksonville Beach,
Florida. Based on the condition of the whale when necropsied and local
surface water temperatures, the investigators conclude that this animal
died within 3 to 6 days prior to necropsy. An analysis of local wind
and water currents prior to January 22 indicated that the winds were
west to northwest, placing the location where the calf most likely died
as inshore and north of where the carcass was found.
[[Page 8225]]
NMFS has determined that both the entanglement and death of the whale
occurred within the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area for the following
reasons: (1) All sightings of this calf occurred within the Southeast
U.S. Restricted Area; (2) all the southeast sightings were recent; (3)
mother-calf pairs typically remain on the calving grounds in January;
(4) the carcass was found within the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area;
and (5) the calf's most likely location when it died was inshore and
north of where the carcass was found.
On Monday, January 23, 2006, at 7:15 a.m., a specialized large
whale necropsy team, which consisted of various Federal and state
government representatives, and university and non-profit marine mammal
specialists, performed a thorough necropsy of the whale. This consisted
of measuring, photographing, dissecting, and collecting tissues samples
of the animal in order to determine the possible cause of death. The
necropsy team's gross examination indicated a variety of lesions
including numerous small lesions around the tailstock and a single
large dorsal lesion. The whale had a complex array of wounds around its
tailstock. Two wounds were bites from a small shark. Those wounds had
been seen in aerial photos of the calf as early as December 30, 2005.
Most of the remaining wounds formed straight-line, vee-, and diamond-
shaped patterns. These small lesions appeared to be pre-mortem and
caused by a fine cutting edge such as monofilament net, which would
also correspond to the characteristic vee and diamond shapes of gillnet
gear. There was also some post-mortem scavenging by sharks. The whale
had a large wound splitting open most of its back. The wound appeared
to have occurred post-mortem and was not the result of a vessel strike.
The edges of the middle of the wound were clean-cut, while the ends
were ragged. A notable observation by the necropsy team was that
cyamids had migrated to the tailstock, indicating significant injury to
this area which may have impeded the animal's ability to swim and dive.
The necropsy team also noted that the blubber thickness would suggest
the animal was in good body condition, but, based on its empty
gastrointestinal track, it had not been able to nurse for at least a
day prior to its death.
The immediate cause of death of the whale (e.g., drowning,
dehydration, infection) has not been determined and may never be
completely known. However, all available evidence suggests the
entanglement and injury of the whale by gillnet gear ultimately led to
the death of the animal. The evidence of recent entanglement was
clearly documented by the necropsy team. The degree of entanglement
meets NMFS' criteria of a serious injury (i.e., an injury likely to
result in mortality). While there was no entangling gear on the animal
at the time it was reported, NMFS knows it was not removed through
permitted disentanglement efforts, and NMFS believes that the calf did
not disentangle itself as it was young and not expected to be strong
enough to shed the imbedded gear. Therefore, based on the results of
the necropsy, the New England Aquarium's aerial survey database,
evidence of gillnet fisheries operating in the area (see Affected
Fisheries), and in the absence of other significant explanatory
findings, NMFS has determined that the right whale mortality, which
occurred on January 22, 2006, was as a result of entanglement in
gillnet gear.
Closure of Southeast U.S. Restricted Area to Gillnet Fisheries
NMFS has evaluated the recent right whale mortality event and
determined that the criteria specified in 50 CFR 229.32(g)(1) for
taking additional action to protect right whales from further serious
injury or mortality, under the ALWTRP, have been met. NMFS has
determined that the mortality of this right whale was due to
entanglement in gillnet gear, and that the entanglement occurred within
the Southeastern U.S. Restricted Area. Thus, NMFS believes that closing
the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area to all gillnet gear through the
remainder of the restricted period, through March 31, 2006, is
warranted and urgent. Therefore, the AA announces that all fishing with
gillnets is prohibited in the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area, beginning
at 0001 hours February 15, 2006 through 2400 hours March 31, 2006. All
such gillnets that are currently set must be retrieved by 11:59 p.m on
February 15, 2006. Since existing ALWTRP rules already prohibit gillnet
fishing at night, except for run-around sets, which are tended sets,
there is no need to provide any extended delay in effectiveness to
allow fishermen to retrieve set gear.
This restriction will be announced to state officials, fishermen,
ALWTRT members, and other interested parties through e-mail, phone
contact, NOAA Web site, and other appropriate media immediately upon
filing with the Federal Register.
The regulations at 50 CFR 229.32(g)(1) also requires the AA to
close the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area for the rest of the time
period, and for the time period November 15 through March 31 in each
subsequent year, unless the AA revises the restricted period or unless
other measures are implemented. NMFS plans to seek assistance and
recommendations from the ALWTRT at their next meeting in order to
evaluate whether permanent closures within the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area are necessary.
Affected Gillnet Fisheries
In Southeast Atlantic waters, commercial fishermen target various
finfish and shark species using gillnet gear of varied sizes and
deployment techniques. Fisheries expected to be affected by this
rulemaking include, but are not limited to, the Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic shark gillnet fishery and the Southeast Atlantic gillnet
fishery.
The Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet fishery uses 5-inch
(0.127 m) or greater stretch mesh gillnet gear, typically targeting
various shark species. NMFS believes there are approximately six to
eight active vessels in this fishery. The FWC's trip ticket database
(2002-2005) for counties within the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area
(Nassau, Duval, St. John's, Flagler, Volusia, and Brevard) indicates
that overall shark landings, number of trips, and the dollar value of
this fishery, has been declining since 2002 within this area. In 2005,
there was a total of 280,235 pounds (127,113 kg) of sharks landed,
which corresponded to 180 trips and a value of $180,015. Although the
Southeast U.S. Restricted Area consists of Florida and Georgia waters,
landings information was only obtained from Florida since landings from
gillnet gear are prohibited in the State of Georgia. This fishery is
managed by the NMFS Office of Sustainable Fisheries, Highly Migratory
Species Division.
The Southeast Atlantic gillnet fishery typically uses smaller mesh
gillnet gear, less than 5-inch stretch mesh, targeting mostly coastal
migratory species (King mackerel, Spanish mackerel, whiting, and
bluefish). Based on the FWC's trip ticket database for 2005, NMFS
believes that approximately 56 individuals participate in this fishery
annually. Data from the same database for 2002-2005 for counties within
the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area indicate that overall finfish
landings (excluding whiting; see below), number of trips, and the value
of the fishery has been decreasing since 2002 for fishermen targeting
finfish with gillnets in this area. For 2005, there was a total of
153,905 pounds (69,810 kg) of finfish landed, which corresponded to 978
trips and a value of $129,454. As stated above, the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area consists of Florida and
[[Page 8226]]
Georgia waters, but landings information was only obtained from Florida
since landings from gillnet gear are prohibited in the State of
Georgia. Florida gillnet finfish landings have been dominated by the
following species: bluefish, Spanish mackerel, cobia, and King
mackerel. These species are managed by NMFS and the South Atlantic
Regional Fishery Management Council.
NMFS has also become aware of recent increases in fishing activity
by fishermen specifically using sink gillnet gear of various mesh size
targeting demersal finfish, primarily whiting (Menticirrhus
americanus). In contrast to the above landings information, the FWC's
trip ticket database (2002-2005) for counties within the Southeast U.S.
Restricted Area indicates that overall finfish landings, number of
trips, and the value of demersal finfish landings have been increasing
since 2002, mostly from fishermen targeting whiting with gillnets in
this area. NMFS is unaware how many participants fish for demersal
finfish using only sink gillnet gear, since catches from all gillnet
gear are combined in the trip ticket database. For 2005, there was a
total of 461,858 pounds (209,495 kg) of whiting landed, which
corresponded to 589 trips and a value of $363,960. Again, the Southeast
U.S. Restricted Area consists of Florida and Georgia waters; however,
landings information was only obtained from Florida since landings from
gillnet gear are prohibited in the State of Georgia. At this time, the
South Atlantic Regional Fishery Management Council does not prohibit
the use of gillnets within the southeast Exclusive Economic Zone waters
for non-FMP species (50 CFR 600.725). Thus, fishermen who target
whiting are not regulated by a FMP, because currently this species is
not managed under the Coastal Migratory FMP or any other FMP.
The above-mentioned estimates for the total value of the gillnet
fisheries operating in the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area are based on
preliminary total annual landings for 2005. FWC's trip ticket data for
counties within the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area for the past six
years (2000-2005) during the months of February and March, indicate an
average of 15 fishermen fish in these areas during the months that will
be affected by this temporary closure. Total economic losses during
February and March 2006 were projected, based on the combined average
total landings and average total revenues from gillnet fishing in these
three areas, and are estimated at 92,687 pounds and $74,364.
Additional Conservation Measures
The AA may withdraw or modify any additional restriction on fishing
activities if the AA determines that such action is warranted.
Notification of any additional, modified, or suspended right whale
conservation measures will be published in the Federal Register
pursuant to 50 CFR 229.32(g)(1) or (2).
NMFS will continue to monitor right whale serious injuries and
mortalities to gauge the effectiveness of these conservation measures.
In addition, although the ALWTRT recommended additional measures to
further protect right whales from serious injury and mortality in
commercial fishing operations in southeast waters during 2005 and NMFS
published a proposed rule on June 21, 2005 (70 FR 35894), NMFS believes
that, at this time, because of the recent entanglement event and the
current level of commercial gillnet fishing operations in Southeast
waters, NMFS plans to seek assistance and recommendations from the
ALWTRT at their next meeting in order to evaluate whether permanent
closures within the Southeast U.S. Restricted Area are necessary in
addition to the recently proposed measures.
Literature Cited
Knowlton, A.R. and S.D. Kraus. 2001. Mortality and serious injury of
North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) in the North
Atlantic Ocean. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. (Special Issue) 2 (in
press).
Kraus, S.D., M.W. Brown, H. Caswell, C.W. Clark, M. Fujiwara, P.K.
Hamilton, R.D. Kenney, A.R. Knowlton, S. Landry, C.A. Mayo, W.A.
McLellan, M.J. Moore, D.P. Nowacek, D.A. Pabst, A.J. Read, R.M.
Rolland. 2005. North Atlantic Right Whales in Crisis. Science 22
July 2005: Vol. 309. no. 5734, pp. 561-562.
NMFS. 2005. Recovery Plan for the North Atlantic Right Whale
(Eubalaena glacialis). National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver
Spring, MD.
Waring, G., R. Pace, J. Quintal, C. Fairfield and K. Maze-Foley.
2003. U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine Mammal Stock
Assessments--2003. NOAA Tech. Mem. NMFS-NE-182. 260 pp.
Classification
In accordance with section 118(f)(9) of the MMPA, the AA has
determined that this action is necessary to implement a take reduction
plan to protect North Atlantic right whales. In addition, pursuant to
section 11(f) of the ESA, the AA may promulgate regulations to enforce
the ESA's prohibitions on the taking of endangered right whales.
An Environmental Assessment for this action was prepared and is
available from the agency upon request.
Providing prior notice and opportunity for comment on this action
would be impracticable because it would prevent NMFS from implementing
timely measures, pursuant to regulations at 50 U.S.C. 229(g)(1), to
immediately reduce the risk of further serious injury and mortality of
endangered right whales. If this action were to be subject to the
notice and comment rulemaking requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553, NMFS would
not be able to assert these regulatory protections to endangered right
whales because the rulemaking would not be concluded until some time
beyond the end of the protection period. In order to ensure that right
whales are protected during the restricted period, the AA finds that
good cause exists, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), to waive prior
notice and an opportunity to comment on this action to implement a
commercial gillnet fishing closure within the Southeast U.S. Restricted
Area to reduce the risk of entanglement of endangered right whales in
commercial gillnet gear.
For the same reasons, the AA finds that, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3),
good cause exists to waive the 30-day delay in effective date. If NMFS
were to delay for 30 days the effective date of this action, right
whales would be vulnerable to entanglement, which could result in
further serious injury and mortality.
NMFS determined that this action is consistent to the maximum
extent practicable with the enforceable policies of the approved
coastal management programs of Georgia and Florida. This determination
was submitted on February 3, 2006, for review by the responsible state
agencies under section 307 of the CZMA.
The rule implementing the commercial gillnet fishing closure within
the Southeastern U.S. Restricted Area has been determined not to be
significant under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866.
This temporary rule is exempt from the procedures of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act because the rule is issued without prior notice and
opportunity for public comment.
NMFS believes this temporary rule does not contain policies with
federalism implications under E.O. 13132, since the state waters
affected already prohibit gillneting under state law; however, full
consultation with the states was not practicable for this action
pursuant to section 6 of E.O. 13132.
This action does not contain a collection-of-information
requirement for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act.
[[Page 8227]]
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., and
50 CFR 229.32(g)(1).
Dated: February 13, 2006.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Operations, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 06-1490 Filed 2-13-06; 3:56 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P