Safety Zone; Gulf of Alaska, Narrow Cape, Kodiak Island, AK, 8213-8215 [06-1438]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 32 / Thursday, February 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Location
Type
Effective
date
Port Canaveral, FL .............................
Plantation Key, FL .............................
Pensacola, FL ....................................
Dauphin Island Bridge, AL .................
Bayou La Batre, AL ...........................
Gulf Shores, AL .................................
Choctawhatchee Bay Bridge, FL .......
Biloxi, MS ...........................................
Dauphin Island Bridge .......................
Gulf Shores, AL .................................
Santa Rosa Island, FL .......................
Aucilla River, FL .................................
Southwest Pass Safety Fairway, LA
Louisville, KY .....................................
Paducah, KY ......................................
Pittsburgh, PA ....................................
Chester, WV .......................................
Weirton, WV .......................................
Pittsburgh, PA ....................................
Orange, TX ........................................
Savannah, GA ....................................
Louisiana, MO ....................................
St. Louis, MO .....................................
Guttenburg, IA ....................................
St. Charles, MO .................................
Davenport, IA .....................................
Chillicothe, IL .....................................
Peoria, IL ............................................
St. Louis, MO .....................................
Atchison, KS ......................................
St. Paul, MN .......................................
Sioux City, IA .....................................
La Grange, MO ..................................
Red Wing, MN ...................................
Red Wing, MN ...................................
Tampa Bay, FL ..................................
Tampa Bay, FL ..................................
Security Zones (Part 165) ......................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Security Zones (Part 165) ......................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) ........................
09/26/2005
08/28/2005
06/17/2005
07/05/2005
07/05/2005
07/05/2005
07/05/2005
07/09/2005
07/09/2005
07/09/2005
07/09/2005
07/09/2005
05/26/2005
07/31/2005
07/13/2005
07/01/2005
07/04/2005
07/04/2005
07/17/2005
07/04/2005
08/07/2005
06/16/2005
07/02/2005
07/02/2005
07/03/2005
07/03/2005
07/04/2005
07/04/2005
07/16/2005
07/16/2005
07/18/2005
07/23/2005
07/30/2005
07/30/2005
08/06/2005
07/02/2005
07/05/2005
Docket No.
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
COTP
JACKSONVILLE–05–130 .......
KEY WEST–05–004 ...............
MOBILE–05–010 .....................
MOBILE–05–016 .....................
MOBILE–05–017 .....................
MOBILE–05–018 .....................
MOBILE–05–019 .....................
MOBILE–05–020 .....................
MOBILE–05–021 .....................
MOBILE–05–022 .....................
MOBILE–05–023 .....................
MOBILE–05–024 .....................
NEW ORLEANS–05–029 .......
OHIO VALLEY–05–010 ..........
OHIO VALLEY–05–012 ..........
PITTSBURGH–05–012 ...........
PITTSBURGH–05–013 ...........
PITTSBURGH–05–014 ...........
PITTSBURGH–05–015 ...........
PORT ARTHUR–05–012 ........
SAVANNAH–05–110 ..............
ST LOUIS–05–010 ..................
ST LOUIS–05–012 ..................
ST LOUIS–05–013 ..................
ST LOUIS–05–014 ..................
ST LOUIS–05–015 ..................
ST LOUIS–05–016 ..................
ST LOUIS–05–017 ..................
ST LOUIS–05–019 ..................
ST LOUIS–05–020 ..................
ST LOUIS–05–021 ..................
ST LOUIS–05–022 ..................
ST LOUIS–05–023 ..................
ST LOUIS–05–024 ..................
ST LOUIS–05–025 ..................
TAMPA–05–099 ......................
TAMPA–05–100 ......................
Dated: February 10, 2006.
S.G. Venckus,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law.
[FR Doc. 06–1439 Filed 2–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP Western Alaska–06–002]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Gulf of Alaska, Narrow
Cape, Kodiak Island, AK
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the Gulf of Alaska, encompassing the
navigable waters in the vicinity of
Narrow Cape and Ugak Island. The zone
is needed to protect persons and vessels
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:40 Feb 15, 2006
8213
Jkt 208001
operating in the vicinity of the safety
zone during a rocket launch from the
Alaska Aerospace Development
Corporation, Narrow Cape, Kodiak
Island facility. Entry of vessels or
persons into this zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the
Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard
District, the Coast Guard Captain of the
Port, Western Alaska, or their on-scene
representative. The intended effect of
the safety zone is to ensure the safety of
human life and property during the
rocket launch.
DATES: This temporary final rule is
effective from 2 a.m. on February 20,
2006 through 10:30 a.m. on February 23,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are available for inspection and
copying at Coast Guard Marine Safety
Detachment Kodiak, Kodiak, AK 99619.
Normal Office hours are 7:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT
Patrick Lee, Marine Safety Detachment,
at (907) 486–5918.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory History
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(8), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. The dates
for rocket launches often change at the
last moment or the rocket launch is
cancelled. In the past, the Coast Guard
has received several changes to rocket
launch dates before the rocket launch
actually occurs. As a result, it is
impracticable to publish and NPRM
because the date for the rocket launch
is likely to change at the last minute.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. The process of scheduling a
rocket launch is uncertain due to
unforeseen delays such as weather that
can cause cancellation of the launch.
Any delay encountered in this
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
8214
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 32 / Thursday, February 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
regulation’s effective date would be
unnecessary and contrary to public
interest since immediate action is
needed to protect human life and
property from possible fallout from the
rocket launch. The parameters of the
zone will not unduly impair business
and transits of vessels. The Coast Guard
will announce via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners the anticipated date and time
of each launch and will grant general
permission to enter the safety zone
during those times in which the launch
does not pose a hazard to mariners.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Background and Purpose
The Alaska Aerospace Development
Corporation will launch an unmanned
rocket from their facility at Narrow
Cape, Kodiak Island, Alaska sometime
between 6 a.m. and 10 a.m. during a
four-day period between February 20,
2006 and February 23, 2006. The safety
zone is necessary to protect spectators
and transiting vessels from the potential
hazards associated with the launch.
The Coast Guard will announce via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners the
anticipated date and time of the launch
and will grant general permission to
enter the safety zone during those times
in which a launch schedule does not
pose a hazard to mariners. Because the
hazardous situation is expected to last
for approximately eight and a half (8.5)
hours each day during the four-day
launch window period, and because
general permission to enter the safety
zone will be given during nonhazardous times, the impact of this rule
on commercial and recreational traffic is
expected to be minimal.
Discussion of Rule
From the latest information received
from the Alaska Aerospace
Development Corporation, the launch
window is scheduled for four (4) hours
during a four-day period between
February 20 and February 23, 2006. The
safety zone will be enforced from 2 a.m.
to 10:30 a.m. on each of these days. The
Captain of the Port, Western Alaska will
terminate the safety zone after rocket
launch operations are complete.
The size of the safety zone has been
set to protect the public from potential
hazards associated with the launch. The
duration of the safety zone period will
allow time for proper surveillance to be
conducted to ensure the public is clear
of the hazard area prior to and
immediately following the rocket
launch. The Pacific Range Support
Team has identified a launch area
exclusion zone from the area north of
Narrow Cape to a point south of Ugak
Island along the launch trajectory. The
COTP will enforce a single safety zone
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:31 Feb 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
in support of their exclusion zone. The
established safety zone includes the
navigable waters in the vicinity of
Narrow Cape and Ugak Island, within
the boundaries defined by a line drawn
from a point located at 57°29.8′ North,
152°17.0′ West, then southeast to a
point located at 57°21.1′ North,
152°11.2′ West, then southwest to a
point located at 57°19.9′ North,
152°14.2′ West, and then northwest to a
point located at 57°25.4′ North,
152°28.2′ West, and then northeast to
the point located at 57°29.8′ North,
152°17.0′ West. All coordinates
reference Datum: NAD 1983.
This safety zone is necessary to
protect transiting vessels from the
potential hazards associated with the
Rocket launch. The Coast Guard will
announce via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners the anticipated date and time
of the launch and will grant general
permission to enter the safety zone
during those times in which the launch
does not pose a hazard to mariners.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential cost
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not significant under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) (44 FR 11040; February 26, 1979).
The Coast Guard expects the economic
impact of this rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under
paragraph 10(e) of the regulatory
policies and procedures of DHS is
unnecessary. Because the hazardous
situation is expected to last for
approximately eight and a half (8.5)
hours each day during the four-day
launch window period, and because
general permission to enter the safety
zone will be given during nonhazardous times, the impact of this rule
on commercial traffic should be
minimal. Before the effective period, we
will issue maritime advisories widely
available to users of the affected portion
of the Gulf of Alaska. We believe there
will be minimal economic impact on
commercial traffic.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have significant
economic impacts on a substantial
number of small entities. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit, anchor, or
fish in a portion of the Gulf of Alaska
from north of Narrow Cape to South of
Ugak Island from 2:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.
each day from February 20 until
February 23, 2006 until rocket launch
operations are complete. Because the
hazardous situation is expected to last
for approximately eight and a half (8.5)
hours of each day during the four-day
launch window period, and because
general permission to enter the safety
zone will be given during nonhazardous times, the impact of this rule
on commercial and recreational traffic
should be minimal. Before the effective
period, we will issue maritime
advisories widely available to users of
the affected portion of the Gulf of
Alaska. We believe there will be
minimal impact to small entities.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 32 / Thursday, February 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
economically significant and does not
cause an environmental risk to health or
risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct affect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. We
invite your comments on how this
proposed rule might impact tribal
governments, even if that impact may
not constitute a ‘‘tribal implication’’
under the Order.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:31 Feb 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical
exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, we believe that
this rule should be categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation because
this rule establishes a safety zone. A
final ‘‘Environmental Analysis Check
List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ will be available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. From February 20, 2006 to February
23, 2006 add temporary § 165.T17–124
to read as follows:
I
§ 165.T17–124 Alaska Aerospace
Development Corporation, Safety Zone;
Gulf of Alaska, Narrow Cape, Kodiak Island,
AK.
(a) Description. The established safety
zone includes the navigable waters in
the vicinity of Narrow Cape and Ugak
Island, within the boundaries defined
by a line drawn from a point located at
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8215
57°29.8′ North, 152°17.0′ West, then
southeast to a point located at 57°21.1′
North, 152°11.2′ West, then southwest
to a point located at 57°19.9′ North,
152°14.2′ West, and then northwest to a
point located at 57°25.4′ North,
152°28.2′ West, and then northeast to
the point located at 57°29.8′ North,
152°17.0′ West. All coordinates
reference Datum: NAD 1983.
(b) Enforcement periods. The safety
zone in this section will be enforced
from 2 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. during each
day of a four-day launch window period
from February 20, 2006 to February 23,
2006.
(c) Regulations. (1) The Duty Officer
at Marine Safety Detachment, Kodiak,
Alaska can be contacted at telephone
number (907) 486–5918.
(2) The Captain of the Port may
authorize and designate any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer to act on his behalf in enforcing
the safety zone.
(3) The general regulations governing
safety zones contained in § 165.23
apply. No person or vessel may enter or
remain in this safety zone without first
obtaining permission from the Captain
of the Port or his on-scene
representative. The Captain of the Port,
Western Alaska, on-scene representative
may be contacted at Marine Safety
Detachment Kodiak.
Dated: January 31, 2006.
M.R. DeVries,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Western Alaska.
[FR Doc. 06–1438 Filed 2–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900–AK65
Filipino Veterans’ Benefits
Improvements
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document amends the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
adjudication regulations to reflect
changes made by three Public Laws.
First, Public Law 106–377, the
Departments of Veterans Affairs and
Housing and Urban Development, and
Independent Agencies Appropriations
Act, 2001, changed the rate of
compensation payments to certain
veterans of the Philippine
Commonwealth Army and recognized
guerrilla forces, who reside in the
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8213-8215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-1438]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP Western Alaska-06-002]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Gulf of Alaska, Narrow Cape, Kodiak Island, AK
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
Gulf of Alaska, encompassing the navigable waters in the vicinity of
Narrow Cape and Ugak Island. The zone is needed to protect persons and
vessels operating in the vicinity of the safety zone during a rocket
launch from the Alaska Aerospace Development Corporation, Narrow Cape,
Kodiak Island facility. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Commander, Seventeenth
Coast Guard District, the Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Western
Alaska, or their on-scene representative. The intended effect of the
safety zone is to ensure the safety of human life and property during
the rocket launch.
DATES: This temporary final rule is effective from 2 a.m. on February
20, 2006 through 10:30 a.m. on February 23, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are available for inspection and copying at Coast Guard
Marine Safety Detachment Kodiak, Kodiak, AK 99619. Normal Office hours
are 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT Patrick Lee, Marine Safety
Detachment, at (907) 486-5918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory History
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(8), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. The dates for rocket launches
often change at the last moment or the rocket launch is cancelled. In
the past, the Coast Guard has received several changes to rocket launch
dates before the rocket launch actually occurs. As a result, it is
impracticable to publish and NPRM because the date for the rocket
launch is likely to change at the last minute.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. The process of scheduling a rocket
launch is uncertain due to unforeseen delays such as weather that can
cause cancellation of the launch. Any delay encountered in this
[[Page 8214]]
regulation's effective date would be unnecessary and contrary to public
interest since immediate action is needed to protect human life and
property from possible fallout from the rocket launch. The parameters
of the zone will not unduly impair business and transits of vessels.
The Coast Guard will announce via Broadcast Notice to Mariners the
anticipated date and time of each launch and will grant general
permission to enter the safety zone during those times in which the
launch does not pose a hazard to mariners.
Background and Purpose
The Alaska Aerospace Development Corporation will launch an
unmanned rocket from their facility at Narrow Cape, Kodiak Island,
Alaska sometime between 6 a.m. and 10 a.m. during a four-day period
between February 20, 2006 and February 23, 2006. The safety zone is
necessary to protect spectators and transiting vessels from the
potential hazards associated with the launch.
The Coast Guard will announce via Broadcast Notice to Mariners the
anticipated date and time of the launch and will grant general
permission to enter the safety zone during those times in which a
launch schedule does not pose a hazard to mariners. Because the
hazardous situation is expected to last for approximately eight and a
half (8.5) hours each day during the four-day launch window period, and
because general permission to enter the safety zone will be given
during non-hazardous times, the impact of this rule on commercial and
recreational traffic is expected to be minimal.
Discussion of Rule
From the latest information received from the Alaska Aerospace
Development Corporation, the launch window is scheduled for four (4)
hours during a four-day period between February 20 and February 23,
2006. The safety zone will be enforced from 2 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on
each of these days. The Captain of the Port, Western Alaska will
terminate the safety zone after rocket launch operations are complete.
The size of the safety zone has been set to protect the public from
potential hazards associated with the launch. The duration of the
safety zone period will allow time for proper surveillance to be
conducted to ensure the public is clear of the hazard area prior to and
immediately following the rocket launch. The Pacific Range Support Team
has identified a launch area exclusion zone from the area north of
Narrow Cape to a point south of Ugak Island along the launch
trajectory. The COTP will enforce a single safety zone in support of
their exclusion zone. The established safety zone includes the
navigable waters in the vicinity of Narrow Cape and Ugak Island, within
the boundaries defined by a line drawn from a point located at
57[deg]29.8[min] North, 152[deg]17.0[min] West, then southeast to a
point located at 57[deg]21.1[min] North, 152[deg]11.2[min] West, then
southwest to a point located at 57[deg]19.9[min] North,
152[deg]14.2[min] West, and then northwest to a point located at
57[deg]25.4[min] North, 152[deg]28.2[min] West, and then northeast to
the point located at 57[deg]29.8[min] North, 152[deg]17.0[min] West.
All coordinates reference Datum: NAD 1983.
This safety zone is necessary to protect transiting vessels from
the potential hazards associated with the Rocket launch. The Coast
Guard will announce via Broadcast Notice to Mariners the anticipated
date and time of the launch and will grant general permission to enter
the safety zone during those times in which the launch does not pose a
hazard to mariners.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential cost and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not significant under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) (44 FR 11040; February 26, 1979). The Coast Guard
expects the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10(e) of the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. Because the hazardous situation
is expected to last for approximately eight and a half (8.5) hours each
day during the four-day launch window period, and because general
permission to enter the safety zone will be given during non-hazardous
times, the impact of this rule on commercial traffic should be minimal.
Before the effective period, we will issue maritime advisories widely
available to users of the affected portion of the Gulf of Alaska. We
believe there will be minimal economic impact on commercial traffic.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have significant economic impacts on
a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit, anchor, or fish in a portion of the Gulf of Alaska from north
of Narrow Cape to South of Ugak Island from 2:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.
each day from February 20 until February 23, 2006 until rocket launch
operations are complete. Because the hazardous situation is expected to
last for approximately eight and a half (8.5) hours of each day during
the four-day launch window period, and because general permission to
enter the safety zone will be given during non-hazardous times, the
impact of this rule on commercial and recreational traffic should be
minimal. Before the effective period, we will issue maritime advisories
widely available to users of the affected portion of the Gulf of
Alaska. We believe there will be minimal impact to small entities.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have
[[Page 8215]]
taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions
and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not economically significant and does not cause an environmental
risk to health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect
children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct affect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. We invite your
comments on how this proposed rule might impact tribal governments,
even if that impact may not constitute a ``tribal implication'' under
the Order.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that there are no factors in this
case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, we believe that this rule should
be categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g) of the
Instruction, from further environmental documentation because this rule
establishes a safety zone. A final ``Environmental Analysis Check
List'' and a final ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' will be
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR
part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. From February 20, 2006 to February 23, 2006 add temporary Sec.
165.T17-124 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T17-124 Alaska Aerospace Development Corporation, Safety
Zone; Gulf of Alaska, Narrow Cape, Kodiak Island, AK.
(a) Description. The established safety zone includes the navigable
waters in the vicinity of Narrow Cape and Ugak Island, within the
boundaries defined by a line drawn from a point located at 57[deg]29.8'
North, 152[deg]17.0' West, then southeast to a point located at
57[deg]21.1' North, 152[deg]11.2' West, then southwest to a point
located at 57[deg]19.9' North, 152[deg]14.2' West, and then northwest
to a point located at 57[deg]25.4' North, 152[deg]28.2' West, and then
northeast to the point located at 57[deg]29.8' North, 152[deg]17.0'
West. All coordinates reference Datum: NAD 1983.
(b) Enforcement periods. The safety zone in this section will be
enforced from 2 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. during each day of a four-day launch
window period from February 20, 2006 to February 23, 2006.
(c) Regulations. (1) The Duty Officer at Marine Safety Detachment,
Kodiak, Alaska can be contacted at telephone number (907) 486-5918.
(2) The Captain of the Port may authorize and designate any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer to act on his behalf in
enforcing the safety zone.
(3) The general regulations governing safety zones contained in
Sec. 165.23 apply. No person or vessel may enter or remain in this
safety zone without first obtaining permission from the Captain of the
Port or his on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port, Western
Alaska, on-scene representative may be contacted at Marine Safety
Detachment Kodiak.
Dated: January 31, 2006.
M.R. DeVries,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Western Alaska.
[FR Doc. 06-1438 Filed 2-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P