Medical Devices; Cardiovascular Devices; Classification of Implantable Intra-Aneurysm Pressure Measurement System, 7869-7871 [06-1417]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(3) Sections 202(c), 210, 211, 212, 213,
214, 220, 221 and 222;
(4) Sections 305(c); and
(5) Any necessary enforcement
provision of part III of the Federal
Power Act (including but not limited to
sections 306, 307, 308, 309, 314, 315,
316 and 316A) with regard to the
sections listed in paragraphs (c)(1), (2),
(3) and (4) of this section.
I 9. In § 292.602, paragraphs (b) and (c)
are revised to read as follows:
§ 292.602 Exemption of qualifying facilities
from certain State law and regulation.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Exemption from the Public Utility
Holding Company Act of 2005. A
qualifying facility described in
paragraph (a) of this section or a utility
geothermal small power production
facility shall not be considered to be an
‘‘electric utility company’’ as defined in
section 1262(5) of the Public Utility
Holding Company Act of 2005, 42
U.S.C. 16451(5).
(c) Exemption from certain State laws
and regulations.
(1) Any qualifying facility shall be
exempted (except as provided in
paragraph (b)(2)) of this section from
State laws or regulations respecting:
(i) The rates of electric utilities; and
(ii) The financial and organizational
regulation of electric utilities.
(2) A qualifying facility may not be
exempted from State laws and
regulations implementing subpart C.
(3) Upon request of a state regulatory
authority or nonregulated electric
utility, the Commission may consider a
limitation on the exemptions specified
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(4) Upon request of any person, the
Commission may determine whether a
qualifying facility is exempt from a
particular State law or regulation.
Note: The following Appendix will not be
published in the Code of Federal Regulations.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Appendix: List of Petitioners
Requesting Clarification or Submitting
Comments
American Chemistry Council
American Electric Power Service Corporation
jointly with AEP Texas North Company,
AEP Texas Central Company, Appalachian
Power Company, Columbus Southern
Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power
Company, Kentucky Power Company,
Kingsport Power Company, Ohio Power
Company, Public Service Company of
Oklahoma, Southwestern Electric Power
Company, and Wheeling Power Company
(collectively, AEP)
American Forest & Paper Association
(American Forest & Paper)
American Public Power Association (APPA)
American Wind Energy Association (AWEA)
ARIPPA
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:14 Feb 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
California Electricity Oversight Board (CEOB)
Calpine Corporation (Calpine)
CE Generation, LLC (CE Generation)
Cinergy Solutions, Inc. (Cinergy)
Cogeneration Association California jointly
with Energy Producers and Users
Coalition, Cogeneration Coalition of
Washington, and Nevada Independent
Energy Coalition (collectively, QF Parties)
Cogentrix Energy, inc. (Cogentrix) jointly
with Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (Goldman
Sachs) (collectively, Independent Sellers)
Constellation Energy Group, Inc.
(Constellation)
Council of Industrial Boiler Owners (CIBO)
Delta Power Company, LLC (Delta Power)
jointly with Juniper Generation, LLC
(Juniper), and California Cogeneration
Council (California Cogen)
Department of Housing and Urban
Development
Dow Chemical Company (Dow)
Edison Electric Institute (EEI)
Edison Mission Energy jointly with Edison
Mission Marketing & Trading, Inc.,
Midwest Generation EME, LLC
(collectively, Edison Mission Energy)
(intervention only)
Electric Power Supply Association (EPSA)
Electricity Consumers Resource Council
(ELCON) jointly with American Iron and
Steel Institute (AISI) (collectively,
Industrial Consumers)
Enel North America, Inc. (Enel)
Entergy Services, Inc. jointly with Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.; Entergy Gulf States, Inc.;
Entergy Louisiana, Inc.; Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.; and Entergy New
Orleans, Inc. (collectively, Entergy)
Environmental Protection Agency
The Fertilizer Institute (Fertilizer Institute)
Florida Industrial Cogeneration Association
(Florida Industrial Cogeneration)
GE Energy Financial Services (GE)
Granite State Hydropower Association, Inc.
(Granite State Hydropower)
Illinois Landfill Gas Coalition (Illinois
Landfill Gas)
Indeck Energy Services, Inc. (Indeck)
Kentucky Public Service Commission
(Kentucky Commission)
Marina Energy, LLC (Marina Energy)
National Association of Regulatory Utility
Commissioners (NARUC)
National Rural Electric Cooperative
Association (NRECA)
New York State Electric & Gas Corporation
(NYSEG) jointly with Rochester Gas and
Electric Corporation (Rochester G&E)
Non-Utility QF Group
North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power
Agency (NCEMPA)
Occidental Chemical Corporation
(Occidental)
Oklahoma Corporation Commission
(Oklahoma Commission)
Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company (OG&E)
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)
Primary Energy Ventures LLC (Primary
Energy)
Process Gas Consumers Group Electricity
Committee (Electricity Committee)
Progress Energy, Inc. (Progress Energy)
Public Service Company of New Mexico
(PSNM) jointly with Texas-New Mexico
Power Company (TNP)
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7869
Public Service Electric and Gas Company
jointly with PSEG Power LLC, PSEG
Energy Resources & Trade LLC, and PSEG
Global L.L.C. (collectively, PSEG)
Public Utility Commission of Ohio (Ohio
Commission)
Ridgewood Renewable Power, LLC
(Ridgewood)
Solar Turbines Incorporated (Solar Turbines)
Southern California Edison Company (SoCal
Edison)
Transmission Access Policy Study Group
(TAPS)
U.S. Combined Heat and Power Association
(USCHPA)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Xcel Energy Services Inc. (Xcel)
York County Solid Waste and Refuse
Authority (York County)
[FR Doc. 06–1194 Filed 2–14–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR 870
[Docket No. 2005N–0506]
Medical Devices; Cardiovascular
Devices; Classification of Implantable
Intra-Aneurysm Pressure Measurement
System
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is classifying the
implantable intra-aneurysm pressure
measurement system into class II
(special controls). The special control
that will apply to the device is the
guidance document entitled ‘‘Class II
Special Controls Guidance Document:
Implantable Intra-Aneurysm Pressure
Measurement System.’’ The agency is
classifying the device into class II
(special controls) in order to provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. Elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register, FDA
is announcing the availability of a
guidance document that will serve as
the special control for the device.
DATES: This rule is effective March 17,
2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nelson Anderson, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health (HFZ–450),
Food and Drug Administration, 9200
Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850,
301–443–8282, ext. 171.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
7870
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
I. What Is the Background of This
Rulemaking?
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)),
devices that were not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976 (the amendments),
generally referred to as postamendments
devices, are classified automatically by
statute into class III without any FDA
rulemaking process. These devices
remain in class III and require
premarket approval, unless and until
the device is classified or reclassified
into class I or II, or FDA issues an order
finding the device to be substantially
equivalent, in accordance with section
513(i) of the act, to a predicate device
that does not require premarket
approval. The agency determines
whether new devices are substantially
equivalent to previously marketed
devices by means of the premarket
notification procedures in section 510(k)
of the act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807
(21 CFR part 807) of FDA regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the act provides
that any person who submits a
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the act for a device that has not
previously been classified may, within
30 days after receiving an order
classifying the device in class III under
section 513(f)(1) of the act, request FDA
to classify the device under the criteria
set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the act.
FDA shall, within 60 days of receiving
such a request, classify the device by
written order. This classification shall
be the initial classification of the device.
Within 30 days after the issuance of an
order classifying the device, FDA must
publish a notice in the Federal Register
announcing such classification (section
513(f)(2) of the act).
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the act, FDA issued an order on August
4, 2005, classifying the CardioMEMS
EndoSensor System into class III,
because it was not substantially
equivalent to a device that was
introduced or delivered for introduction
into interstate commerce for commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, or a
device which was subsequently
reclassified into class I or class II. On
August 9, 2005, CardioMEMS, Inc.,
submitted a petition requesting
classification of the CardioMEMS
EndoSensor System under section
513(f)(2) of the act. The manufacturer
recommended that the device be
classified into class II.
In accordance with 513(f)(2) of the
act, FDA reviewed the petition in order
to classify the device under the criteria
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:14 Feb 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
for classification set forth in 513 (a)(1)
of the act. Devices are to be classified
into class II if general controls, by
themselves, are insufficient to provide
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient
information to establish special controls
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the petition,
FDA determined that the CardioMEMS
EndoSensor System can be classified
into class II with the establishment of
special controls. FDA believes these
special controls will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device type.
The device type is assigned the
generic name Implantable IntraAneurysm Pressure Measurement
System, and it is identified as a device
intended to measure the intra-sac
pressure in a vascular aneurysm. The
device consists of a pressure transducer
that is implanted into the aneurysm and
a monitor that reads the pressure from
the transducer.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device: (1) Adverse tissue
reaction, (2) the migration of implanted
sensor, (3) inaccurate sensor
information, (3) failure of implanted
sensor, (4) failure of delivery system, (5)
failure of electronic monitor, (6)
electromagnetic interference, (7)
electrical hazards, (8) magnetic
resonance imaging incompatibility, (9)
ultrasound incompatibility, (10)
external defibrillation incompatibility,
and (11) failure to detect and/or
diagnose an endoleak that requires
intervention.
FDA believes that the class II special
controls guidance document entitled,
‘‘Implantable Intra-Aneurysm Pressure
Measurement System’’ will aid in
mitigating the potential risks to health
by providing recommendations on
biocompatibility testing, bench testing,
software validation, electromagnetic
compatibility testing, electrical safety
testing, sterility of the device, magnetic
resonance imaging compatibility,
labeling, ultrasound compatibility,
defibrillator compatibility, animal
testing, and clinical testing. The
guidance document also provides
information on how to meet premarket
(510(k)) submission requirements for the
device. FDA believes that the special
controls guidance document, in
addition to general controls, addresses
the risks to health identified previously
and provides reasonable assurance of
the safety and effectiveness of the
device. Therefore, on October 28, 2005,
FDA issued an order to the petitioner
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
classifying the device into class II. FDA
is codifying this classification by adding
§ 870.2855 to its classification
regulations.
Following the effective date of this
final classification rule, any firm
submitting a 510(k) premarket
notification for an implantable intraaneurysm pressure measurement system
will need to address the issues covered
in the special controls guidance.
However, the firm need only show that
its device meets the recommendations
of the guidance, or in some other way
provides equivalent assurances of safety
and effectiveness.
Section 510(m) of the act provides
that FDA may exempt a class II device
from the premarket notification
requirement under 510(k) of the act if
FDA determines that premarket
notification is not necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. For this type
of device, FDA has determined that
premarket notification is necessary to
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device
and, therefore, the type of device is not
exempt from premarket notification
requirements. Persons who intend to
market this type of device must submit
to FDA a premarket notification, prior to
marketing the device, which contains
information about the implantable intraaneurysm pressure measurement system
they intend to market.
II. What Is the Environmental Impact of
This Rule?
The agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
III. What Is the Economic Impact of
This Rule?
FDA has examined the impacts of the
final rule under Executive Order 12866
and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612), and the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4). Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The
agency believes that this final rule is not
a significant regulatory action as defined
by the Executive order and so it is not
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 15, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
subject to review under the Executive
order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because classification of this
device in class II will relieve
manufacturers of the device of the cost
of complying with the premarket
approval requirements of section 515 of
the act (21 U.S.C. 360e), and may permit
small potential competitors to enter the
marketplace by lowering their costs, the
agency certifies that the final rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or the private sector, of $100,000,000 or
more (adjusted annually for inflation) in
any one year.’’
The current threshold after
adjustment for inflation is $115 million,
using the most current (2003) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic
Product. FDA does not expect this final
rule to result in any 1-year expenditure
that would meet or exceed this amount.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
IV. Does This Rule Have Federalism
Implications?
FDA has analyzed this final rule in
accordance with the principles set forth
in Executive Order 13132. FDA has
determined that the rule does not
contain policies that have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, the
agency has concluded that the rule does
not contain policies that have
federalism implications as defined in
the Executive order and, consequently,
a federalism summary impact statement
is not required.
V. How Does This Rule Comply With
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?
This final rule contains no collection
of information. Therefore, clearance by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) is not required.
FDA also concludes that the special
controls guidance document does not
contain new information collection
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:14 Feb 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
7871
provisions that are subject to review and
clearance by OMB under the PRA.
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
VI. What References are on Display?
29 CFR Parts 4022 and 4044
The following reference has been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Benefits Payable in Terminated SingleEmployer Plans; Allocation of Assets
in Single-Employer Plans; Interest
Assumptions for Valuing and Paying
Benefits
1. Petition from CardioMEMS, Inc., dated
August 9, 2005.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 870
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 870 is
amended as follows:
I
PART 870—CARDIOVASCULAR
DEVICES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 870 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 371.
2. Section 870.2855 is added to
subpart C to read as follows:
I
§ 870.2855 Implantable Intra-aneurysm
Pressure Measurement System.
(a) Identification. Implantable intraaneurysm pressure measurement system
is a device used to measure the intra-sac
pressure in a vascular aneurysm. The
device consists of a pressure transducer
that is implanted into the aneurysm and
a monitor that reads the pressure from
the transducer.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special control is FDA’s
guidance document entitled ‘‘Class II
Special Controls Guidance Document:
Implantable Intra-Aneurysm Pressure
Measurement System.’’ See § 870.1 (e)
for the availability of this guidance
document.
Dated: February 6, 2006.
Linda S. Kahan,
Deputy Director, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. 06–1417 Filed 2–14–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation’s regulations on Benefits
Payable in Terminated Single-Employer
Plans and Allocation of Assets in
Single-Employer Plans prescribe interest
assumptions for valuing and paying
benefits under terminating singleemployer plans. This final rule amends
the regulations to adopt interest
assumptions for plans with valuation
dates in March 2006. Interest
assumptions are also published on the
PBGC’s Web site (https://www.pbgc.gov).
DATES: Effective March 1, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine B. Klion, Attorney, Legislative
and Regulatory Department, Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005,
202–326–4024. (TTY/TDD users should
call the Federal relay service by dialing
711 and ask for 202–326–4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
PBGC’s regulations prescribe actuarial
assumptions—including interest
assumptions—for valuing and paying
plan benefits of terminating singleemployer plans covered by title IV of
the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974. The interest
assumptions are intended to reflect
current conditions in the financial and
annuity markets.
Three sets of interest assumptions are
prescribed: (1) A set for the valuation of
benefits for allocation purposes under
section 4044 (found in Appendix B to
Part 4044), (2) a set for the PBGC to use
to determine whether a benefit is
payable as a lump sum and to determine
lump-sum amounts to be paid by the
PBGC (found in Appendix B to Part
4022), and (3) a set for private-sector
pension practitioners to refer to if they
wish to use lump-sum interest rates
determined using the PBGC’s historical
methodology (found in Appendix C to
Part 4022).
This amendment (1) adds to
Appendix B to Part 4044 the interest
assumptions for valuing benefits for
allocation purposes in plans with
valuation dates during March 2006, (2)
adds to Appendix B to Part 4022 the
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7869-7871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-1417]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR 870
[Docket No. 2005N-0506]
Medical Devices; Cardiovascular Devices; Classification of
Implantable Intra-Aneurysm Pressure Measurement System
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the
implantable intra-aneurysm pressure measurement system into class II
(special controls). The special control that will apply to the device
is the guidance document entitled ``Class II Special Controls Guidance
Document: Implantable Intra-Aneurysm Pressure Measurement System.'' The
agency is classifying the device into class II (special controls) in
order to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of
the device. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is
announcing the availability of a guidance document that will serve as
the special control for the device.
DATES: This rule is effective March 17, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nelson Anderson, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health (HFZ-450), Food and Drug Administration, 9200
Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-443-8282, ext. 171.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 7870]]
I. What Is the Background of This Rulemaking?
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)), devices that were not in
commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, the date of enactment of
the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (the amendments), generally
referred to as postamendments devices, are classified automatically by
statute into class III without any FDA rulemaking process. These
devices remain in class III and require premarket approval, unless and
until the device is classified or reclassified into class I or II, or
FDA issues an order finding the device to be substantially equivalent,
in accordance with section 513(i) of the act, to a predicate device
that does not require premarket approval. The agency determines whether
new devices are substantially equivalent to previously marketed devices
by means of the premarket notification procedures in section 510(k) of
the act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807) of FDA
regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the act provides that any person who submits a
premarket notification under section 510(k) of the act for a device
that has not previously been classified may, within 30 days after
receiving an order classifying the device in class III under section
513(f)(1) of the act, request FDA to classify the device under the
criteria set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the act. FDA shall, within
60 days of receiving such a request, classify the device by written
order. This classification shall be the initial classification of the
device. Within 30 days after the issuance of an order classifying the
device, FDA must publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing
such classification (section 513(f)(2) of the act).
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the act, FDA issued an
order on August 4, 2005, classifying the CardioMEMS EndoSensor System
into class III, because it was not substantially equivalent to a device
that was introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate
commerce for commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or a device
which was subsequently reclassified into class I or class II. On August
9, 2005, CardioMEMS, Inc., submitted a petition requesting
classification of the CardioMEMS EndoSensor System under section
513(f)(2) of the act. The manufacturer recommended that the device be
classified into class II.
In accordance with 513(f)(2) of the act, FDA reviewed the petition
in order to classify the device under the criteria for classification
set forth in 513 (a)(1) of the act. Devices are to be classified into
class II if general controls, by themselves, are insufficient to
provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness, but there is
sufficient information to establish special controls to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use. After review of the information submitted in the
petition, FDA determined that the CardioMEMS EndoSensor System can be
classified into class II with the establishment of special controls.
FDA believes these special controls will provide reasonable assurance
of the safety and effectiveness of the device type.
The device type is assigned the generic name Implantable Intra-
Aneurysm Pressure Measurement System, and it is identified as a device
intended to measure the intra-sac pressure in a vascular aneurysm. The
device consists of a pressure transducer that is implanted into the
aneurysm and a monitor that reads the pressure from the transducer.
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device: (1) Adverse tissue reaction, (2)
the migration of implanted sensor, (3) inaccurate sensor information,
(3) failure of implanted sensor, (4) failure of delivery system, (5)
failure of electronic monitor, (6) electromagnetic interference, (7)
electrical hazards, (8) magnetic resonance imaging incompatibility, (9)
ultrasound incompatibility, (10) external defibrillation
incompatibility, and (11) failure to detect and/or diagnose an endoleak
that requires intervention.
FDA believes that the class II special controls guidance document
entitled, ``Implantable Intra-Aneurysm Pressure Measurement System''
will aid in mitigating the potential risks to health by providing
recommendations on biocompatibility testing, bench testing, software
validation, electromagnetic compatibility testing, electrical safety
testing, sterility of the device, magnetic resonance imaging
compatibility, labeling, ultrasound compatibility, defibrillator
compatibility, animal testing, and clinical testing. The guidance
document also provides information on how to meet premarket (510(k))
submission requirements for the device. FDA believes that the special
controls guidance document, in addition to general controls, addresses
the risks to health identified previously and provides reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device. Therefore, on
October 28, 2005, FDA issued an order to the petitioner classifying the
device into class II. FDA is codifying this classification by adding
Sec. 870.2855 to its classification regulations.
Following the effective date of this final classification rule, any
firm submitting a 510(k) premarket notification for an implantable
intra-aneurysm pressure measurement system will need to address the
issues covered in the special controls guidance. However, the firm need
only show that its device meets the recommendations of the guidance, or
in some other way provides equivalent assurances of safety and
effectiveness.
Section 510(m) of the act provides that FDA may exempt a class II
device from the premarket notification requirement under 510(k) of the
act if FDA determines that premarket notification is not necessary to
provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the
device. For this type of device, FDA has determined that premarket
notification is necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety
and effectiveness of the device and, therefore, the type of device is
not exempt from premarket notification requirements. Persons who intend
to market this type of device must submit to FDA a premarket
notification, prior to marketing the device, which contains information
about the implantable intra-aneurysm pressure measurement system they
intend to market.
II. What Is the Environmental Impact of This Rule?
The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
III. What Is the Economic Impact of This Rule?
FDA has examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive
Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). Executive
Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The agency believes that
this final rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by
the Executive order and so it is not
[[Page 7871]]
subject to review under the Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Because classification of this device in class II
will relieve manufacturers of the device of the cost of complying with
the premarket approval requirements of section 515 of the act (21
U.S.C. 360e), and may permit small potential competitors to enter the
marketplace by lowering their costs, the agency certifies that the
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or the private
sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in
any one year.''
The current threshold after adjustment for inflation is $115
million, using the most current (2003) Implicit Price Deflator for the
Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this final rule to result
in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or exceed this amount.
IV. Does This Rule Have Federalism Implications?
FDA has analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles
set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that the rule
does not contain policies that have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Accordingly, the agency has concluded
that the rule does not contain policies that have federalism
implications as defined in the Executive order and, consequently, a
federalism summary impact statement is not required.
V. How Does This Rule Comply With the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?
This final rule contains no collection of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) is not
required.
FDA also concludes that the special controls guidance document does
not contain new information collection provisions that are subject to
review and clearance by OMB under the PRA.
VI. What References are on Display?
The following reference has been placed on display in the Division
of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, and may be seen by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
1. Petition from CardioMEMS, Inc., dated August 9, 2005.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 870
Medical devices.
0
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
870 is amended as follows:
PART 870--CARDIOVASCULAR DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 870 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 371.
0
2. Section 870.2855 is added to subpart C to read as follows:
Sec. 870.2855 Implantable Intra-aneurysm Pressure Measurement System.
(a) Identification. Implantable intra-aneurysm pressure measurement
system is a device used to measure the intra-sac pressure in a vascular
aneurysm. The device consists of a pressure transducer that is
implanted into the aneurysm and a monitor that reads the pressure from
the transducer.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
control is FDA's guidance document entitled ``Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Implantable Intra-Aneurysm Pressure Measurement
System.'' See Sec. 870.1 (e) for the availability of this guidance
document.
Dated: February 6, 2006.
Linda S. Kahan,
Deputy Director, Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. 06-1417 Filed 2-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S