New Mexico Regulatory Program, 7477-7480 [E6-1976]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an
opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public
hearing. If you wish to meet with us to
discuss the amendment, please request
a meeting by contacting the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings are open to
the public and, if possible, we will post
notices of meetings at the locations
listed under ADDRESSES. We will make
a written summary of each meeting a
part of the administrative record.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 926
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: December 30, 2005.
Allen D. Klein,
Director, Western Region.
[FR Doc. E6–2005 Filed 2–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 931
[SATS No. NM–044]
New Mexico Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of
a proposed amendment to the New
Mexico regulatory program (hereinafter,
the ‘‘New Mexico program’’) under the
Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the
Act). New Mexico proposes revisions to
statutes concerning administrative
review of decisions and the award of
attorney’s fees and legal costs. New
Mexico intends to revise its program to
be consistent with the corresponding
provisions of SMCRA and clarify the
administrative and judicial review
process.
This document gives the times and
locations that the New Mexico program
and proposed amendment to that
program are available for your
inspection, the comment period during
which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the
procedures that we will follow for the
public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4
p.m., m.s.t. March 15, 2006. If
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:30 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
requested, we will hold a public hearing
on the amendment on March 10, 2006.
We will accept requests to speak until
4 p.m., m.s.t. on February 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘SATS No. NM–044’’, by
any of the following methods:
• E-mail: WGAINER@OSMRE.GOV.
Include ‘‘SATS No. NM–044’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Willis
Gainer, Chief, Albuquerque Field Office,
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, 505 Marquette
Avenue, NW., Suite 1200, Albuquerque,
NM 87102, Telephone: (505) 248–5096.
E-mail address: wgainer@osmre.gov.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
SATS No. NM–044. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see the ‘‘Public
Comment Procedures’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: Access to the docket, to
review copies of the New Mexico
program, this amendment, a listing of
any scheduled public hearings, and all
written comments received in response
to this document, may be obtained at
the addresses listed below during
normal business hours, Monday through
Friday, excluding holidays. You may
receive one free copy of the amendment
by contacting the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement’s
(OSM) Albuquerque Field Office. In
addition, you may review a copy of the
amendment during regular business
hours at the following locations:
Willis Gainer, Chief, Albuquerque
Field Office Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 505
Marquette Avenue NW., Suite 1200,
Albuquerque, NM 87102 Telephone:
(505) 248–5096, E-mail address:
wgainer@osmre.gov.
Bill Brancard, Director, Mining and
Minerals Division, Energy, Minerals and
Natural Resources Department, 1220
South St. Francis Drive, Santa Fe, NM
87505, Telephone: (505) 476–3400.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Willis L. Gainer Telephone: (505) 248–
5096. E-mail address:
wgainer@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the New Mexico Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7477
I. Background on the New Mexico
Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its State program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the New Mexico
program on December 31, 1980. You can
find background information on the
New Mexico program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and the conditions of
approval of the New Mexico program in
the December 31, 1980, Federal Register
(45 FR 86459). You can also find later
actions concerning New Mexico’s
program and program amendments at 30
CFR 931.11, 931.15, 931.16, and 931.30.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By letter dated November 18, 2005,
New Mexico sent us a proposed
amendment to its program
(administrative record No. 874) under
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). New
Mexico sent the amendment in response
to a condition of the New Mexico
program approval at 30 CFR 931.11(e),
concerning the award of attorney’s fees
and legal costs, and to include the
changes made at its own initiative to
clarify the administrative and judicial
appeals process. The full text of the
program amendment is available for you
to read at the locations listed above
under ADDRESSES.
New Mexico proposes revisions,
described below, of the New Mexico
Surface Mining Act (NMSA) 1978 and
New Mexico Annotated Code (NMAC).
The proposed revisions of NMSA 1978
were adopted by the New Mexico
legislature and became effective June 17,
2005. The proposed revisions of NMAC
were adopted by the Coal Surface
Mining Commission on November 16,
2005, but will not become effective until
they are published in the New Mexico
Register.
New Mexico proposes stylistic
editorial revisions to update citations
and grammar of NMSA 1978 at (1)
Section 69–25A–18.A., B., C., D., and F.,
concerning the decisions of the director
of the New Mexico program and
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
7478
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
appeals, and (2) Section 69–25A–29.A.,
B., C., D., E., and F., concerning the
administrative review of a notice or
order by the director of the New Mexico
program.
New Mexico proposes to revise
NMSA 1978 at Section 69–25A–29.F,
concerning administrative review and
the assessment of costs and expenses,
including attorney fees, for a person’s
participation in the administrative
proceedings, including judicial review
of agency actions, by deleting the
provision stating that no such
assessment shall be imposed upon the
director of the New Mexico program.
New Mexico proposes to revise
NMSA 1978 at Section 69–25A–29,
concerning administrative review, by
deleting entirely 69–25A–29.G., which
provided for an appeal to the
commission for relief by any person
aggrieved by a decision of the director
of the New Mexico program.
New Mexico proposes stylistic
editorial revisions of NMSA 1978, at
Section 69–25A–30A. and B.,
concerning judicial review, to update
grammar and clarify that appeals to the
district court may be made by a party
who is aggrieved by a decision of the
director of the New Mexico program.
New Mexico proposes revision of
NMSA 1978 at Section 69–25A–36,
concerning termination of agency life, to
extend the authority of the Coal Surface
Mining Commission to operate
according to the provisions of NMSA
from July 1, 2005, until July 1, 2012.
New Mexico proposes editorial
revisions, stylistic in nature, to correct
citations and/or clarify sentence or
paragraph structure, of NMAC at the
following sections:
Section 19.8.11.1100.A.(3), D., and
D.(2), concerning public notices of filing
of permit applications;
Section 19.8.11.1101.C., concerning
opportunity for submission of written
comments on permit applications;
Section 19.8.11.1102.A and B.(2),
concerning the right to file written
objections;
Section 19.8.11.1103.A.(3), B., B.(1),
D., E.(1), and F., concerning hearings
and conferences;
Section 19.8.11.1104.B, concerning
public availability of information in
permit applications on file with the
director;
Section 19.8.11.1105.C.(2), D., E., and
F., concerning review of permit
applications;
Section 19.8.11.1106.C., D.(3), F.,
G.(1) and (2), and N., concerning criteria
for permit approval or denial;
Section 19.8.11.1107.A., B., B.(1),
B.(1)(b), B.(3), C., D., E., and F.,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:33 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
concerning general procedures for
improvidently issued permits;
Section 19.8.11.1108.B, concerning
existing structures and criteria for
permit approval or denial;
Section 19.8.11.1109.A.(4), B., B.(1)
and (2), B.(2)(b), B.(3), and D.,
concerning permit approval or denial
actions;
Section 19.8.11.1110.A.(1),
concerning the rescission process for
improvidently issued permits;
Section 19.8.11.1111.B., concerning
permit terms;
Section 19.8.11.1113.C.(2), concerning
conditions of permit for environment,
public health and safety;
Section 19.8.11.1114., concerning
conformance of permit;
Section 19.8.11.1115.A., B., and C.,
concerning verification of ownership or
control application information;
Section 19.8.11.1116.B. and B.(2)(b),
concerning review of ownership or
control and violation information;
Section 19.8.11.1117.A., A.(1), (2) and
(3), B., C., D., D.(1) and (2), and D.(2)(a)
and (b), concerning procedures for
challenging ownership or control links
shown in the applicant violator system;
and
Section 19.8.11.1118.B, B.(1), (2) and
(3), B.(3)(1), C., C.(1)(a) through (c), and
C.(2), concerning standards for
challenging ownership or control links
and the status of violations.
New Mexico proposes to revise
Section 10.8.12.1201 NMAC, concerning
appeals for administrative review by the
Coal Surface Mining Commission of
decisions by the director of the New
Mexico program, by deleting it entirely
and reserving it.
New Mexico proposes to revise
Section 10.8.12.1202 NMAC, concerning
judicial review, to state that (1) a party
to a proceeding before the director who
is aggrieved by a director’s decision
issued after a hearing may obtain a
review of that decision pursuant to
Section 39–3–1.1 NMSA 1978; and (2) a
person who is or may be aggrieved by
a rule or an amendment or repel of a
rule the commission adopts may appeal
to the court of appeals for review
pursuant to Subsection B of 69–25A–30
NMSA 1978.
New Mexico proposes editorial
revisions of Section 19.8.12.1203.A
through J. and L. NMAC, concerning
formal review of notices of violation,
cessation orders, and show cause orders
by the director of the New Mexico
program, that are stylistic in nature to
clarify the grammar and sentence
structure.
New Mexico proposes revision of
Section 19.8.12.1203.K NMAC,
concerning formal review of notices of
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
violation, cessation orders, and show
cause orders issued by the director of
the New Mexico program, to state that
the district court may review the
director’s decisions pursuant to
Subsection G of Section 69–25A–29
NMSA 1978 and 19.8.12.1202. NMAC.
New Mexico proposes to revise Part
19.8.12.1200 NMAC by adding Section
19.8.12.1204.A through G, concerning
petitions for award of legal costs and
expenses, to specify who may file, time
and place for filing, contents of the
petition, timeframe for response to the
petition, who may receive an award,
what the award may include, and where
to appeal a decision concerning the
award of such legal costs and expenses.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the New Mexico program.
Written Comments
Send your written or electronic
comments to OSM at the address given
above. Your comments should be
specific, pertain only to the issues
proposed in this rulemaking, and
include explanations in support of your
recommendations. We will not consider
or respond to your written comments
when developing the final rule if they
are received after the close of the
comment period (see DATES). We will
make every attempt to log all comments
into the administrative record, but
comments delivered to an address other
than the Albuquerque Field Office may
not be logged in.
Electronic Comments
Please submit Internet comments as
an ASCII file avoiding the use of special
characters and any form of encryption.
Please also include ‘‘Attn: SATS No.
NM–044’’ and your name and return
address in your Internet message. If you
do not receive a confirmation that we
have received your Internet message,
contact the Albuquerque Field Office at
(505) 248–5096. In the final rulemaking,
we will not consider or include in the
administrative record any electronic
comments received after the time
indicated under DATES or at e-addresses
other than the Albuquerque Field
Office.
Availability of Comments
We will make comments, including
names and addresses of respondents,
available for public review during
normal business hours. We will not
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
consider anonymous comments. If
individual respondents request
confidentiality, we will honor their
request to the extent allowable by law.
Individual respondents who wish to
withhold their name or address from
public review, except for the city or
town, must state this prominently at the
beginning of their comments. We will
make all submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public review in their entirety.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4
p.m., m.s.t. on February 28, 2006. If you
are disabled and need special
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
the hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at a public
hearing provide us with a written copy
of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
If only one person requests an
opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public
hearing. If you wish to meet with us to
discuss the amendment, please request
a meeting by contacting the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings are open to
the public and, if possible, we will post
notices of meetings at the locations
listed under ADDRESSES. We will make
a written summary of each meeting a
part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulation.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:33 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
7479
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
The rule does not involve or affect
Indian tribes in any way.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a)
and (b) of that section. However, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State regulatory
programs and program amendments
because each program is drafted and
promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations
and whether the other requirements of
30 CFR parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires that State laws
regulating surface coal mining and
reclamation operations be ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA. Section 503(a)(7) requires that
State programs contain rules and
regulations ‘‘consistent with’’
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on Federally
recognized Indian tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
major Federal actions within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq).
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2) of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million.
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
7480
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This determination is based upon the
fact that the State submittal which is the
subject of this rule is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 931
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: December 14, 2005.
Allen D. Klein,
Regional Director, Western Regional
Coordinating Center.
[FR Doc. E6–1976 Filed 2–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 935
[OH–250–FOR]
Ohio Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) is
announcing receipt of a proposed
amendment to the Ohio regulatory
program (the ‘‘Ohio program’’) under
the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the
Act). Ohio proposes to revise the Ohio
Revised Code (ORC) regarding changes
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:33 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
to the State’s alternate bonding system
(bond pool). The amendment is
intended to satisfy a program condition
codified in the Federal regulations.
This document gives the times and
locations that the Ohio program and
proposed amendment to that program
are available for your inspection, the
comment period during which you may
submit written comments on the
amendment, and the procedures that we
will follow for the public hearing, if one
is requested.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on this amendment on or
before 4 p.m. (local time), March 15,
2006 to ensure our consideration. If
requested, we will hold a public hearing
on the amendment on March 10, 2006.
We will accept requests to speak until
4 p.m., local time, on February 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘OH–250–FOR’’, by any of
the following methods:
• E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov. Include
‘‘OH–250–FOR’’ in the subject line of
the message;
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. George
Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field Division,
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, 3 Parkway Center,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15220; or
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency docket number
for this rulemaking. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see the ‘‘Public
Comment Procedures’’ heading in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. You may also request to
speak at a public hearing by any of the
methods listed above or by contacting
the individual listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Docket: You may review copies of the
Ohio program, this amendment, a listing
of any scheduled public hearings, and
all written comments received in
response to this document at the
addresses listed below during normal
business hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may also
receive one free copy of this amendment
by contacting OSM’s Pittsburgh Field
Division listed below.
Mr. George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh
Field Division, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, 3 Parkway Center,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15220.
Telephone: (412) 937–2153. E-mail:
grieger@osmre.gov.
Mr. Michael Sponsler, Chief, Division of
Mineral Resources Management, Ohio
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Department of Natural Resources,
1855 Fountain Square Court-Bldg. H–
2, Columbus, Ohio 43224. Telephone:
(614) 265–6633.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field
Division, Telephone: (412) 937–2153. Email: grieger@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Ohio Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Ohio Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of the Act * * * and rules
and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to the Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Ohio
program on August 16, 1982. You can
find background information on the
Ohio program, including the Secretary’s
findings, the disposition of comments,
and conditions of approval of the Ohio
program in the August 16, 1982, Federal
Register (47 FR 34687). You can also
find later actions concerning Ohio’s
program and program amendments at 30
CFR 935.11, 935.15, and 935.16.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By letter dated December 19, 2005,
Ohio sent us a proposed amendment to
its program (Administrative Record
Number OH–2185–07) under SMCRA
(30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). Ohio has
submitted a draft bill for the Ohio
legislature to consider that revises the
ORC regarding changes to the State’s
alternate bonding system (bond pool).
The amendment is intended to satisfy a
program condition codified in the
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 935.11(h).
The program condition provides that
Ohio must submit a program
amendment that demonstrates how the
alternative bonding system will assure
timely reclamation at the site of all
operations for which bond has been
forfeited.
In addition to the revisions described
in detail below, the amendment
submitted by Ohio contains numerous
changes to existing citations to reflect
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7477-7480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1976]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 931
[SATS No. NM-044]
New Mexico Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the New
Mexico regulatory program (hereinafter, the ``New Mexico program'')
under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or
the Act). New Mexico proposes revisions to statutes concerning
administrative review of decisions and the award of attorney's fees and
legal costs. New Mexico intends to revise its program to be consistent
with the corresponding provisions of SMCRA and clarify the
administrative and judicial review process.
This document gives the times and locations that the New Mexico
program and proposed amendment to that program are available for your
inspection, the comment period during which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the procedures that we will follow for
the public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4 p.m.,
m.s.t. March 15, 2006. If requested, we will hold a public hearing on
the amendment on March 10, 2006. We will accept requests to speak until
4 p.m., m.s.t. on February 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``SATS No. NM-044'',
by any of the following methods:
E-mail: WGAINER@OSMRE.GOV. Include ``SATS No. NM-044'' in
the subject line of the message.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Willis Gainer, Chief,
Albuquerque Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, 505 Marquette Avenue, NW., Suite 1200, Albuquerque, NM
87102, Telephone: (505) 248-5096.
E-mail address: wgainer@osmre.gov.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and SATS No. NM-044. For detailed instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Public
Comment Procedures'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document.
Docket: Access to the docket, to review copies of the New Mexico
program, this amendment, a listing of any scheduled public hearings,
and all written comments received in response to this document, may be
obtained at the addresses listed below during normal business hours,
Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. You may receive one free
copy of the amendment by contacting the Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement's (OSM) Albuquerque Field Office. In
addition, you may review a copy of the amendment during regular
business hours at the following locations:
Willis Gainer, Chief, Albuquerque Field Office Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 505 Marquette Avenue NW., Suite
1200, Albuquerque, NM 87102 Telephone: (505) 248-5096, E-mail address:
wgainer@osmre.gov.
Bill Brancard, Director, Mining and Minerals Division, Energy,
Minerals and Natural Resources Department, 1220 South St. Francis
Drive, Santa Fe, NM 87505, Telephone: (505) 476-3400.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Willis L. Gainer Telephone: (505) 248-
5096. E-mail address: wgainer@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the New Mexico Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the New Mexico Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its State program includes, among other things, ``a State law which
provides for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with regulations issued by the
Secretary pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On
the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the New Mexico program on December 31, 1980. You
can find background information on the New Mexico program, including
the Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and the
conditions of approval of the New Mexico program in the December 31,
1980, Federal Register (45 FR 86459). You can also find later actions
concerning New Mexico's program and program amendments at 30 CFR
931.11, 931.15, 931.16, and 931.30.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated November 18, 2005, New Mexico sent us a proposed
amendment to its program (administrative record No. 874) under SMCRA
(30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). New Mexico sent the amendment in response to
a condition of the New Mexico program approval at 30 CFR 931.11(e),
concerning the award of attorney's fees and legal costs, and to include
the changes made at its own initiative to clarify the administrative
and judicial appeals process. The full text of the program amendment is
available for you to read at the locations listed above under
ADDRESSES.
New Mexico proposes revisions, described below, of the New Mexico
Surface Mining Act (NMSA) 1978 and New Mexico Annotated Code (NMAC).
The proposed revisions of NMSA 1978 were adopted by the New Mexico
legislature and became effective June 17, 2005. The proposed revisions
of NMAC were adopted by the Coal Surface Mining Commission on November
16, 2005, but will not become effective until they are published in the
New Mexico Register.
New Mexico proposes stylistic editorial revisions to update
citations and grammar of NMSA 1978 at (1) Section 69-25A-18.A., B., C.,
D., and F., concerning the decisions of the director of the New Mexico
program and
[[Page 7478]]
appeals, and (2) Section 69-25A-29.A., B., C., D., E., and F.,
concerning the administrative review of a notice or order by the
director of the New Mexico program.
New Mexico proposes to revise NMSA 1978 at Section 69-25A-29.F,
concerning administrative review and the assessment of costs and
expenses, including attorney fees, for a person's participation in the
administrative proceedings, including judicial review of agency
actions, by deleting the provision stating that no such assessment
shall be imposed upon the director of the New Mexico program.
New Mexico proposes to revise NMSA 1978 at Section 69-25A-29,
concerning administrative review, by deleting entirely 69-25A-29.G.,
which provided for an appeal to the commission for relief by any person
aggrieved by a decision of the director of the New Mexico program.
New Mexico proposes stylistic editorial revisions of NMSA 1978, at
Section 69-25A-30A. and B., concerning judicial review, to update
grammar and clarify that appeals to the district court may be made by a
party who is aggrieved by a decision of the director of the New Mexico
program.
New Mexico proposes revision of NMSA 1978 at Section 69-25A-36,
concerning termination of agency life, to extend the authority of the
Coal Surface Mining Commission to operate according to the provisions
of NMSA from July 1, 2005, until July 1, 2012.
New Mexico proposes editorial revisions, stylistic in nature, to
correct citations and/or clarify sentence or paragraph structure, of
NMAC at the following sections:
Section 19.8.11.1100.A.(3), D., and D.(2), concerning public
notices of filing of permit applications;
Section 19.8.11.1101.C., concerning opportunity for submission of
written comments on permit applications;
Section 19.8.11.1102.A and B.(2), concerning the right to file
written objections;
Section 19.8.11.1103.A.(3), B., B.(1), D., E.(1), and F.,
concerning hearings and conferences;
Section 19.8.11.1104.B, concerning public availability of
information in permit applications on file with the director;
Section 19.8.11.1105.C.(2), D., E., and F., concerning review of
permit applications;
Section 19.8.11.1106.C., D.(3), F., G.(1) and (2), and N.,
concerning criteria for permit approval or denial;
Section 19.8.11.1107.A., B., B.(1), B.(1)(b), B.(3), C., D., E.,
and F., concerning general procedures for improvidently issued permits;
Section 19.8.11.1108.B, concerning existing structures and criteria
for permit approval or denial;
Section 19.8.11.1109.A.(4), B., B.(1) and (2), B.(2)(b), B.(3), and
D., concerning permit approval or denial actions;
Section 19.8.11.1110.A.(1), concerning the rescission process for
improvidently issued permits;
Section 19.8.11.1111.B., concerning permit terms;
Section 19.8.11.1113.C.(2), concerning conditions of permit for
environment, public health and safety;
Section 19.8.11.1114., concerning conformance of permit;
Section 19.8.11.1115.A., B., and C., concerning verification of
ownership or control application information;
Section 19.8.11.1116.B. and B.(2)(b), concerning review of
ownership or control and violation information;
Section 19.8.11.1117.A., A.(1), (2) and (3), B., C., D., D.(1) and
(2), and D.(2)(a) and (b), concerning procedures for challenging
ownership or control links shown in the applicant violator system; and
Section 19.8.11.1118.B, B.(1), (2) and (3), B.(3)(1), C., C.(1)(a)
through (c), and C.(2), concerning standards for challenging ownership
or control links and the status of violations.
New Mexico proposes to revise Section 10.8.12.1201 NMAC, concerning
appeals for administrative review by the Coal Surface Mining Commission
of decisions by the director of the New Mexico program, by deleting it
entirely and reserving it.
New Mexico proposes to revise Section 10.8.12.1202 NMAC, concerning
judicial review, to state that (1) a party to a proceeding before the
director who is aggrieved by a director's decision issued after a
hearing may obtain a review of that decision pursuant to Section 39-3-
1.1 NMSA 1978; and (2) a person who is or may be aggrieved by a rule or
an amendment or repel of a rule the commission adopts may appeal to the
court of appeals for review pursuant to Subsection B of 69-25A-30 NMSA
1978.
New Mexico proposes editorial revisions of Section 19.8.12.1203.A
through J. and L. NMAC, concerning formal review of notices of
violation, cessation orders, and show cause orders by the director of
the New Mexico program, that are stylistic in nature to clarify the
grammar and sentence structure.
New Mexico proposes revision of Section 19.8.12.1203.K NMAC,
concerning formal review of notices of violation, cessation orders, and
show cause orders issued by the director of the New Mexico program, to
state that the district court may review the director's decisions
pursuant to Subsection G of Section 69-25A-29 NMSA 1978 and
19.8.12.1202. NMAC.
New Mexico proposes to revise Part 19.8.12.1200 NMAC by adding
Section 19.8.12.1204.A through G, concerning petitions for award of
legal costs and expenses, to specify who may file, time and place for
filing, contents of the petition, timeframe for response to the
petition, who may receive an award, what the award may include, and
where to appeal a decision concerning the award of such legal costs and
expenses.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the New Mexico program.
Written Comments
Send your written or electronic comments to OSM at the address
given above. Your comments should be specific, pertain only to the
issues proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support
of your recommendations. We will not consider or respond to your
written comments when developing the final rule if they are received
after the close of the comment period (see DATES). We will make every
attempt to log all comments into the administrative record, but
comments delivered to an address other than the Albuquerque Field
Office may not be logged in.
Electronic Comments
Please submit Internet comments as an ASCII file avoiding the use
of special characters and any form of encryption. Please also include
``Attn: SATS No. NM-044'' and your name and return address in your
Internet message. If you do not receive a confirmation that we have
received your Internet message, contact the Albuquerque Field Office at
(505) 248-5096. In the final rulemaking, we will not consider or
include in the administrative record any electronic comments received
after the time indicated under DATES or at e-addresses other than the
Albuquerque Field Office.
Availability of Comments
We will make comments, including names and addresses of
respondents, available for public review during normal business hours.
We will not
[[Page 7479]]
consider anonymous comments. If individual respondents request
confidentiality, we will honor their request to the extent allowable by
law. Individual respondents who wish to withhold their name or address
from public review, except for the city or town, must state this
prominently at the beginning of their comments. We will make all
submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations
or businesses, available for public review in their entirety.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m., m.s.t. on
February 28, 2006. If you are disabled and need special accommodations
to attend a public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests
an opportunity to speak, we will not hold the hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at a public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in
the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with
us to discuss the amendment, please request a meeting by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings
are open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices of
meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will make a
written summary of each meeting a part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this rule
meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that
section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State regulatory programs and program amendments because
each program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of
whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing
Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR parts
730, 731, and 732 have been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA. Section 503(a)(7) requires
that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent with''
regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on Federally recognized Indian tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The rule does not involve or affect Indian tribes in any way.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is (1) considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data
and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million.
[[Page 7480]]
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This determination is based upon the fact that the State submittal
which is the subject of this rule is based upon counterpart Federal
regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a determination made
that the Federal regulation was not considered a major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation did not impose an
unfunded mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 931
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: December 14, 2005.
Allen D. Klein,
Regional Director, Western Regional Coordinating Center.
[FR Doc. E6-1976 Filed 2-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P