Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Application for an Exempted Fishing Permit, 7535-7536 [E6-1916]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
is attached to this notice as Appendix I.
Parties can find a complete discussion
of all issues raised in this review and
the corresponding recommendations in
this public memorandum, which is on
file in the Central Records Unit in room
B–099 of the main Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://www.ia.ita.doc.gov/
frn/. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Final Results of Review
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5), we calculated individual
subsidy rates for the producer/exporters,
Jindal and Polyplex, subject to this
review. We determine the net subsidy
for Jindal to be 15.07 percent ad
valorem, and the net subsidy for
Polyplex to be 9.24 percent ad valorem.
Assessment and Cash Deposit
Instructions
We will instruct U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) to assess
countervailing duties as indicated
above. The Department will instruct
CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties as
detailed above, based upon the f.o.b.
invoice price on all shipments of the
subject merchandise from the producer/
exporters under review, entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
administrative review.
We will instruct CBP to continue to
collect cash deposits for non–reviewed
companies at the most recent company–
specific or country–wide rate applicable
to the company. Accordingly, the cash
deposit rates that will be applied to
non–reviewed companies covered by
this order will be the rate for that
company established in the most
recently completed administrative
proceeding conducted under the URAA.
See Notice of Countervailing Duty
Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip (PET film) from India,
67 FR 44179 (July 1, 2002). These rates
shall apply to all non–reviewed
companies until a review of a company
assigned this rate is requested. In
addition, for the period January 1, 2003,
through December 31, 2003, the
assessment rates applicable to all non–
reviewed companies covered by this
order are the cash deposit rates in effect
at the time of entry.
In the Preliminary Results we
determined that Jindal Polyester
Limited had changed its name to Jindal
Poly Films Limited. We stated that if we
found no reason to reverse this decision,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
7535
we would update our instructions to
CBP to reflect this name change. No
parties commented on this and no other
new information or evidence of changed
circumstances has been presented to
warrant reconsideration of this finding.
Thus we plan to issue instructions to
CBP to reflect this name change.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and notice
are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
II. Background Information and
Subsidies Valuation Information
Dated: February 6, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
VI. State of Himachal Pradesh
Appendix I—Issues and Decision
Memorandum
A. Duty Drawback on Furnace Oil
Procured from Domestic Oil Companies
2. Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme
(DEPS)
Comment 1: Whether the Advance
License Program Provides a
Countervailable Subsidy
Comment 2: Sales Tax Incentives
Comment 3: Whether the Department
Should Exclude an IDBI Loan in
Calculating the Short–Term Benchmark
Comment 4: Whether the Department
Should Consider a Certain EPCGS
License as a Grant or as an Interest–Free
Loan
Comment 5: Calculation of the
Countervailing Duty Rate Under the
Advance License Program
Comment 6: Interest Rates Used to
Calculate the Countervailing Duty Rate
Under the EPCGS Program
Comment 7: The Proper Allocation of
EPCGS and EOU Benefits
Comment 8: Whether the Cash Deposit
Rate Should Include the 80 HHC Tax
Exemption Countervailing Duty Rate
Comment 9: Inclusion of Benefits
Received by Non–Producing Units in
Calculating Jindal’s EOU Countervailing
Duty Rate
Comment 10: Calculation of Jindal’s
Countervailing Duty Rate Under the
EOU Program
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV. Analysis of Programs
A. Programs Conferring Subsidies
1. Pre–Shipment and Post–Shipment
Export Financing
2. Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme
(DEPS)
3. Export Promotion Capital Goods
Scheme (EPCGS)
4. Income Tax Exemption Scheme 80
HHC
5. Capital Subsidy
6. Sales Tax Incentives
I. State of Uttaranchal/Uttar Pradesh
II. State of West Bengal
III. State of Gujurat
IV. State of Madhya Pradesh
V. State of Maharashtra
B. Programs Determined to Be Not Used
1. Export Oriented Units Programs not
used
I. List of Issues
PO 00000
III. Subsidies Valuation Information
3. The Sale and Use of Special Import
Licenses (SILs) for Quality and SILs
for Export Houses, Trading Houses,
Star Trading Houses, or Superstar
Trading Houses (GOI Program)
4. Exemption of Export Credit from
Interest Taxes
5. Loan Guarantees from the GOI
6. Capital Incentive Schemes (SOM and
SUP Program)
7. Waiving of Interest on Loan by
SICOM Limited (SOM Program)
8. Infrastructure Assistance Schemes
(State of Gujarat Program)
V. Analysis of Comments
[FR Doc. E6–1989 Filed 2–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 020706A]
Fisheries Off West Coast States and in
the Western Pacific; Pacific Coast
Groundfish Fishery; Application for an
Exempted Fishing Permit
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
7536
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; receipt of exempted
fishing permit (EFP) application;
announcement of the intent to issue the
EFP; request for comments.
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the receipt
of applications, and the intent to issue
EFPs for vessels participating in an
observation program to monitor the
incidental take of salmon and
groundfish in the shore-based
component of the Pacific whiting
fishery. The EFPs are necessary to allow
trawl vessels fishing for Pacific whiting
to delay sorting their catch, and thus to
retain prohibited species and groundfish
in excess of cumulative trip limits, until
the point of offloading. These activities
are otherwise prohibited by Federal
regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received by
February 28, 2006. The EFPs will be
effective no earlier than March 15, 2006,
and would expire no later than May 31,
2007, but could be terminated earlier
under terms and conditions of the EFPs
and other applicable laws.
ADDRESSES: Send comments or requests
for copies of the EFP applications to
Becky Renko, Northwest Region, NMFS,
7600 Sand Point Way N.E., Bldg. 1,
Seattle, WA 98115 0070 or e-mail
2006WhitingEFP.nwr@noaa.gov.
Comments sent via email, including all
attachments, must not exceed a 10
megabyte file size.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Becky Renko at (206)526 6110.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action is authorized by the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act provisions at 50 CFR
600.745, which state that EFPs may be
used to authorize fishing activities that
would otherwise be prohibited. At the
November 2005 Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Pacific Council)
meeting in San Diego, California, the
Pacific Council received applications for
these EFPs from Del Mar Seafoods, Inc.
and the States of Washington, Oregon,
and California. An opportunity for
public testimony was provided during
the Pacific Council meeting. The Pacific
Council recommended that NMFS issue
the EFPs, as requested by Del Mar
Seafoods Inc. and the States, and
forwarded the EFP applications to
NMFS. NMFS is working with Del Mar
Seafoods, Inc., the States, and
participants who will be fishing under
the EFP to resolve funding, retention,
and monitoring issues affecting this
EFP.
Issuance of these EFPs, to about 40
vessels, will continue an ongoing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Feb 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
program to collect information on the
incidental catch of salmon and
groundfish in whiting harvests
delivered to shore-based processing
facilities by domestic trawl vessels.
Because whiting flesh deteriorates
rapidly once the fish are caught, whiting
must be minimally handled and
immediately chilled to maintain the
flesh quality. As a result, many vessels
dump catch directly or near directly
into the hold and are unable to
effectively sort their catch.
The issuance of EFPs will allow
vessels to delay sorting of groundfish
catch in excess of cumulative trip limits
and prohibited species until offloading.
These activities are otherwise
prohibited by regulation. In 2004 and
2005, NMFS provided electronic
monitoring systems to catcher vessels
fishing under the whiting EFP as part of
a pilot study to evaluate if these systems
would be useful tools to verify retention
and/or document discard at sea. Based
on the results from the 2004 and 2005
pilot studies, electronic monitoring
systems may be useful tools to monitor
retention and discard at sea. NMFS will
continue to evaluate the usefulness of
electronic monitoring tools during the
2006 whiting EFP and once again
intends to provide electronic monitoring
systems to participating vessels.
Delaying sorting until offloading will
allow samplers located at the processing
facilities to collect incidental catch data
for total catch estimates and will enable
whiting quality to be maintained.
Without an EFP, groundfish regulations
at 50 CFR 660.306(a)(2) require vessels
to sort their prohibited species catch
and return them to sea as soon as
practicable with minimum injury.
Similarly, regulations at 50 CFR
660.306(a)(10) prohibit the retention of
groundfish in excess of the published
trip limits.
In addition to providing information
that will be used to monitor the
attainment of the shore-based whiting
allocation, information gathered through
these EFPs is expected to be used in a
future rulemaking. In the near future,
NMFS is considering implementing,
through Federal regulation, a
monitoring program for the shore-based
Pacific whiting fleet. The Pacific
Council recommended using EFPs only
until a permanent monitoring program
could be developed and implemented.
NMFS is developing a preliminary draft
Environmental Assessment that
includes a range of alternative
monitoring systems for the shore-based
Pacific whiting fishery. At its June 2004
meeting, the Pacific Council considered
a preliminary range of alternatives for a
shore-based fishery monitoring program.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Based on information learned during the
2004 and 2005 EFPs, NMFS is revising
that range of alternatives and is
tentatively scheduled to present a
revised range of alternatives to the
Pacific Council at their April 2006
meeting. Provided the Pacific Council
adopts the revised range of alternatives
for public review in April, the Pacific
Council is tentatively expected to make
final recommendations to NMFS
regarding this monitoring program at its
June 2006 meeting. NMFS would then
publish a proposed rule, which would
include a public comment period,
followed by a final rule implementing a
monitoring program before the start of
the 2007 shore-based primary Pacific
whiting season.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: February 7, 2006.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6–1916 Filed 2–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 020206A]
Incidental Take of Marine Mammals;
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental
to Missile Launch Operations from San
Nicolas Island, CA
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of issuance of a letter of
authorization.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), as amended, notification is
hereby given that a letter of
authorization (LOA) to take 3 species of
marine mammals incidental to missile
launch operations from San Nicolas
Island, CA (SNI) has been issued to the
Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons
Division (NAWC-WD), Point Mugu, CA.
DATES: This authorization is effective
from February 3, 2006, through
February 2, 2007.
ADDRESSES: The application and LOA
are available for review in the Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenneth Hollingshead or Layne Bolen,
NMFS, (301) 713–2289.
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7535-7536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1916]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 020706A]
Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Application for an Exempted Fishing
Permit
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
[[Page 7536]]
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; receipt of exempted fishing permit (EFP) application;
announcement of the intent to issue the EFP; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the receipt of applications, and the intent to
issue EFPs for vessels participating in an observation program to
monitor the incidental take of salmon and groundfish in the shore-based
component of the Pacific whiting fishery. The EFPs are necessary to
allow trawl vessels fishing for Pacific whiting to delay sorting their
catch, and thus to retain prohibited species and groundfish in excess
of cumulative trip limits, until the point of offloading. These
activities are otherwise prohibited by Federal regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received by February 28, 2006. The EFPs will be
effective no earlier than March 15, 2006, and would expire no later
than May 31, 2007, but could be terminated earlier under terms and
conditions of the EFPs and other applicable laws.
ADDRESSES: Send comments or requests for copies of the EFP applications
to Becky Renko, Northwest Region, NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way N.E., Bldg.
1, Seattle, WA 98115 0070 or e-mail 2006WhitingEFP.nwr@noaa.gov.
Comments sent via email, including all attachments, must not exceed a
10 megabyte file size.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Becky Renko at (206)526 6110.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action is authorized by the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act provisions at 50 CFR
600.745, which state that EFPs may be used to authorize fishing
activities that would otherwise be prohibited. At the November 2005
Pacific Fishery Management Council (Pacific Council) meeting in San
Diego, California, the Pacific Council received applications for these
EFPs from Del Mar Seafoods, Inc. and the States of Washington, Oregon,
and California. An opportunity for public testimony was provided during
the Pacific Council meeting. The Pacific Council recommended that NMFS
issue the EFPs, as requested by Del Mar Seafoods Inc. and the States,
and forwarded the EFP applications to NMFS. NMFS is working with Del
Mar Seafoods, Inc., the States, and participants who will be fishing
under the EFP to resolve funding, retention, and monitoring issues
affecting this EFP.
Issuance of these EFPs, to about 40 vessels, will continue an
ongoing program to collect information on the incidental catch of
salmon and groundfish in whiting harvests delivered to shore-based
processing facilities by domestic trawl vessels. Because whiting flesh
deteriorates rapidly once the fish are caught, whiting must be
minimally handled and immediately chilled to maintain the flesh
quality. As a result, many vessels dump catch directly or near directly
into the hold and are unable to effectively sort their catch.
The issuance of EFPs will allow vessels to delay sorting of
groundfish catch in excess of cumulative trip limits and prohibited
species until offloading. These activities are otherwise prohibited by
regulation. In 2004 and 2005, NMFS provided electronic monitoring
systems to catcher vessels fishing under the whiting EFP as part of a
pilot study to evaluate if these systems would be useful tools to
verify retention and/or document discard at sea. Based on the results
from the 2004 and 2005 pilot studies, electronic monitoring systems may
be useful tools to monitor retention and discard at sea. NMFS will
continue to evaluate the usefulness of electronic monitoring tools
during the 2006 whiting EFP and once again intends to provide
electronic monitoring systems to participating vessels.
Delaying sorting until offloading will allow samplers located at
the processing facilities to collect incidental catch data for total
catch estimates and will enable whiting quality to be maintained.
Without an EFP, groundfish regulations at 50 CFR 660.306(a)(2) require
vessels to sort their prohibited species catch and return them to sea
as soon as practicable with minimum injury. Similarly, regulations at
50 CFR 660.306(a)(10) prohibit the retention of groundfish in excess of
the published trip limits.
In addition to providing information that will be used to monitor
the attainment of the shore-based whiting allocation, information
gathered through these EFPs is expected to be used in a future
rulemaking. In the near future, NMFS is considering implementing,
through Federal regulation, a monitoring program for the shore-based
Pacific whiting fleet. The Pacific Council recommended using EFPs only
until a permanent monitoring program could be developed and
implemented. NMFS is developing a preliminary draft Environmental
Assessment that includes a range of alternative monitoring systems for
the shore-based Pacific whiting fishery. At its June 2004 meeting, the
Pacific Council considered a preliminary range of alternatives for a
shore-based fishery monitoring program. Based on information learned
during the 2004 and 2005 EFPs, NMFS is revising that range of
alternatives and is tentatively scheduled to present a revised range of
alternatives to the Pacific Council at their April 2006 meeting.
Provided the Pacific Council adopts the revised range of alternatives
for public review in April, the Pacific Council is tentatively expected
to make final recommendations to NMFS regarding this monitoring program
at its June 2006 meeting. NMFS would then publish a proposed rule,
which would include a public comment period, followed by a final rule
implementing a monitoring program before the start of the 2007 shore-
based primary Pacific whiting season.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: February 7, 2006.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6-1916 Filed 2-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S