Medicare Program; Provider Bad Debt Payment; Extension of Timeline for Publication of Final Rule, 6991-6992 [E6-1821]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2006 / Proposed Rules
contained in this seciton were moved to
401 KAR 51:001, ‘‘Definitions for 401
KAR Chapter 51.’’ The rule does not
incorporate the portions of the Federal
rules that were recently vacated by the
DC Circuit Court, including the clean
unit provisions, the pollution control
projects exclusion, and the equipment
replacement provision, which was
promulgated shortly after the 2002 NSR
Reform Rules.
The revisions included in Kentucky’s
NNSR program are substantively the
same as the 2002 NSR Reform Rules.
The Kentucky Rules have been
formatted to conform to Kentucky rule
drafting standards (KRS Chapter 13A),
but in substantive content the rules are
the same as the Federal rules. As part of
its review of the Kentucky submittal,
EPA performed a line-by-line review of
the proposed revisions and has
determined that they are consistent with
the program requirements for the
preparation, adoption and submittal of
implementation plans for New Source
Review, set forth at 40 CFR 51.165.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
IV. What Action Is EPA Proposing To
Take?
EPA is proposing to approve revisions
to the Kentucky SIP (Kentucky
regulations, 401 KAR 51:01, 401 KAR
51:017, and 401 KAR 51:052) submitted
by the Common wealth of Kentucky on
September 2, 2004, and amended on
August 23, 2005. EPA proposed to take
no action on the following provisions of
the Kentucky regulations, which
include portions of the 2002 NSR
Reform Rules that were vacated by the
D.C. Circuit Court: Sections 20, 21, and
22 of 401 KAR 51:017, Sections 11, 12,
and 13 of 401 KAR 51:052, and
definitions (38) and (188) in Section 1
of 401 KAR 51:001.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this proposed
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and therefore is not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This proposed action merely
proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and
imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies
that this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:32 Feb 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule
proposes to approve pre-existing
requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable
duty beyond that required by state law,
it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
This proposed rule also does not have
tribal implications because it will not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
proposes to approve a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and
does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This proposed rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clear Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This proposed
rule does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6991
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: February 3, 2006.
J.I. Palmer Jr.,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 06–1318 Filed 2–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Part 413
[CMS–1126–RCN]
RIN 0938–AK02
Medicare Program; Provider Bad Debt
Payment; Extension of Timeline for
Publication of Final Rule
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Extension of timeline.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Section 1871(a)(3)(A) of the
Social Security Act (the Act) requires us
to publish a Medicare final rule no later
than 3 years after the publication date
of the proposed rule. This notice
announces an extension of the timeline
for publication of a Medicare final rule
in accordance with section 1871(a)(3)(B)
of the Act, which allows us to extend
the timeline for publication of the
‘‘Medicare Program; Provider Bad Debt
Payment’’ final rule under exceptional
circumstances.
Effective Date: This notice is
effective on February 10, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jill
Keplinger, (410) 786–4550.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 10, 2003 (68 FR 6682), we
published a proposed rule that would
revise existing regulations governing
reimbursement for bad debts for all
providers or entities, other than
hospitals, currently eligible for bad debt
reimbursement under the Medicare
program. These proposed revisions were
intended to provide for a consistent bad
debt reimbursement policy for all
providers currently eligible to receive
payments from Medicare for bad debt.
The proposed revisions also would
remove a cap on End Stage Renal
Disease (ESRD) bad debt
reimbursement, which limits payment
of allowable bad debts to the facility’s
unrecovered costs. In addition, the
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
6992
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2006 / Proposed Rules
proposed rule would clarify that bad
debts are not allowable for entities paid
under a reasonable-charge or fee
schedule methodology.
This notice announces an extension of
the timeline for publication of a final
rule responding to comments on the
above proposed rule. Section
1871(a)(3)(B) of the Social Security Act
(the Act) requires us generally to
publish a Medicare final rule no later
than 3 years after the publication date
of the proposed rule. To meet this 3-year
timeframe, the final rule at issue here
would have to be published by February
10, 2006.
Section 1871(a)(3)(B) also provides,
however, that under ‘‘exceptional
circumstances’’ the Secretary may
extend the initial targeted publication
date of a final regulation, if the
Secretary provides public notice of this
extension, including a brief explanation
of the justification for the variation, no
later than the regulation’s previously
established proposed publication date.
This notice extends the timeline
based on the following exceptional
circumstances, which we believe justify
such an extension in this case. On
February 1, 2006, the Congress
completed action on final legislation (S.
1932) that affects the provisions that
would be modified under the proposed
rule at issue here. Section 5004 of this
bill, also known as the Deficit Reduction
Act (DRA), generally provides for a 30
percent reduction in bad debt
reimbursement to Skilled Nursing
Facilities (SNFs), but only with respect
to debt attributable to non-dual
eligibles. Bad debt payment for dual
eligibles would remain at 100 percent.
By contrast, the proposed rule applied
the 30 percent reduction to all providers
other than hospitals, and had no
exception for debt attributable to dualeligibles.
If we were to finalize the SNF bad
debt provisions of the proposed rule at
issue here before the enactment of
section 5004 of the DRA, these
provisions could be superseded by
contrary legislation very shortly after
publication. This would require a new
round of rulemaking to address the
impact of the new legislation. By
extending the deadline for publication
of a final rule, we would hope to avoid
needless and duplicative rulemaking,
and confusion of the public, by
responding to comments on this
proposed rule, and addressing the
effects of section 5004 of the DRA on the
proposed rule, in one rulemaking
document.
In order to allow time for the
President to act on the DRA, and for us
to fully assess the impact of this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:32 Feb 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
legislation on the provisions in the
proposed rule, we are extending the
timeline for this rulemaking for up to
one year, and intend to publish the final
rule no later than February 10, 2007. As
required under section 1871(a)(3)(D), we
will include a discussion of this
extension in a report to Congress.
Authority: Section 1871 of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395hh).
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.774, Medicare—
Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: February 3, 2006.
Ann C. Agnew,
Executive Secretary to the Department.
[FR Doc. E6–1821 Filed 2–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 1
[WT Docket No. 05–211; FCC 06–8]
Commercial Spectrum Enhancement
Act and Modernization of the
Commission’s Competitive Bidding
Rules and Procedures
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this Further Notice of
Proposed Rule Making the Commission
considers whether it should modify its
general competitive bidding rules
governing benefits reserved for
designated entities (i.e., small
businesses, rural telephone companies
and businesses owned by women and
minorities). The Commission has
reached a tentative conclusion that it
should modify its part 1 rules to restrict
the award of designated entity benefits
to an otherwise qualified designated
entity where it has a material
relationship with a large in-region
incumbent wireless service provider,’’
and the Commission seeks comment on
how it should define the elements of
such a restriction. The Commission also
seeks comment on whether it should
restrict the award of designated entity
benefits where an otherwise qualified
designated entity has a ‘‘material
relationship’’ with a large entity that has
a significant interest in communications
services.
DATES: Comments due February 24,
2006 and Reply Comments due March 3,
2006. Written comments on the
Paperwork Reduction Act proposed
information collection requirements
must be submitted by the public, Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), and
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
other interested parties on or before
April 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by WT Docket No. 05–211;
FCC 06–8 by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web Site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• People with Disabilities: Contact
the FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
In addition to filing comments with
the Secretary, a copy of any comments
on the Paperwork Reduction Act
information collection requirements
contained herein should be submitted to
Judith B. Herman, Federal
Communications Commission, Room 1–
C804, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20554, or via the Internet to
PRA@fcc.gov, and to Kristy L. LaLonde,
OMB Desk Officer, Room 10234 NEOB,
725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC
20503, via the Internet to Kristy L.
LaLonde@omb.eop.gov, or via fax at
202–395–5167.
For detailed instructions for
submitting comments and additional
information on the rule making process,
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Carter or Gary Michaels, Auctions
and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, (202) 418–
0660. For additional information
concerning the Paperwork Reduction
Act information collection requirements
contained in this document, contact
Judith B. Herman at 202–418–0214, or
via the Internet at PRA@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to §§ 1.415 and 1.419 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415,
1.419, interested parties may file
comments and reply comments on or
before the dates indicated on the first
page of this document. All filings
related to this Further Notice of
Proposed Rule Making should refer to
WT Docket No. 05–211. Comments may
be filed using: (1) The Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS), (2) the Federal Government’s
eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing
paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
63 FR 24121 (1998). The public may
view a full copy of this document at
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6991-6992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1821]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Part 413
[CMS-1126-RCN]
RIN 0938-AK02
Medicare Program; Provider Bad Debt Payment; Extension of
Timeline for Publication of Final Rule
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Extension of timeline.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Section 1871(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act (the Act)
requires us to publish a Medicare final rule no later than 3 years
after the publication date of the proposed rule. This notice announces
an extension of the timeline for publication of a Medicare final rule
in accordance with section 1871(a)(3)(B) of the Act, which allows us to
extend the timeline for publication of the ``Medicare Program; Provider
Bad Debt Payment'' final rule under exceptional circumstances.
Dates: Effective Date: This notice is effective on February 10, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jill Keplinger, (410) 786-4550.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 10, 2003 (68 FR 6682), we
published a proposed rule that would revise existing regulations
governing reimbursement for bad debts for all providers or entities,
other than hospitals, currently eligible for bad debt reimbursement
under the Medicare program. These proposed revisions were intended to
provide for a consistent bad debt reimbursement policy for all
providers currently eligible to receive payments from Medicare for bad
debt. The proposed revisions also would remove a cap on End Stage Renal
Disease (ESRD) bad debt reimbursement, which limits payment of
allowable bad debts to the facility's unrecovered costs. In addition,
the
[[Page 6992]]
proposed rule would clarify that bad debts are not allowable for
entities paid under a reasonable-charge or fee schedule methodology.
This notice announces an extension of the timeline for publication
of a final rule responding to comments on the above proposed rule.
Section 1871(a)(3)(B) of the Social Security Act (the Act) requires us
generally to publish a Medicare final rule no later than 3 years after
the publication date of the proposed rule. To meet this 3-year
timeframe, the final rule at issue here would have to be published by
February 10, 2006.
Section 1871(a)(3)(B) also provides, however, that under
``exceptional circumstances'' the Secretary may extend the initial
targeted publication date of a final regulation, if the Secretary
provides public notice of this extension, including a brief explanation
of the justification for the variation, no later than the regulation's
previously established proposed publication date.
This notice extends the timeline based on the following exceptional
circumstances, which we believe justify such an extension in this case.
On February 1, 2006, the Congress completed action on final legislation
(S. 1932) that affects the provisions that would be modified under the
proposed rule at issue here. Section 5004 of this bill, also known as
the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA), generally provides for a 30 percent
reduction in bad debt reimbursement to Skilled Nursing Facilities
(SNFs), but only with respect to debt attributable to non-dual
eligibles. Bad debt payment for dual eligibles would remain at 100
percent. By contrast, the proposed rule applied the 30 percent
reduction to all providers other than hospitals, and had no exception
for debt attributable to dual-eligibles.
If we were to finalize the SNF bad debt provisions of the proposed
rule at issue here before the enactment of section 5004 of the DRA,
these provisions could be superseded by contrary legislation very
shortly after publication. This would require a new round of rulemaking
to address the impact of the new legislation. By extending the deadline
for publication of a final rule, we would hope to avoid needless and
duplicative rulemaking, and confusion of the public, by responding to
comments on this proposed rule, and addressing the effects of section
5004 of the DRA on the proposed rule, in one rulemaking document.
In order to allow time for the President to act on the DRA, and for
us to fully assess the impact of this legislation on the provisions in
the proposed rule, we are extending the timeline for this rulemaking
for up to one year, and intend to publish the final rule no later than
February 10, 2007. As required under section 1871(a)(3)(D), we will
include a discussion of this extension in a report to Congress.
Authority: Section 1871 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1395hh).
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.774,
Medicare--Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: February 3, 2006.
Ann C. Agnew,
Executive Secretary to the Department.
[FR Doc. E6-1821 Filed 2-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P