Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: Two Summer Institutes for European Student Leaders, 6812-6818 [E6-1789]
Download as PDF
6812
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 27 / Thursday, February 9, 2006 / Notices
Primary Counties:
Bryan, Carter, Choctaw, Creek,
Mcintosh, Murray, Muskogee,
Okmulgee, Osage, Payne, Pittsburg,
Pontotoc, Tulsa, Wagoner.
Contiguous Counties: Oklahoma:
Atoka, Haskell, Johnston, Kay,
Latimer, Love, Marshall, Mccurtain,
Pawnee, Pushmataha, Sequoyah,
Washington
Kansas:
Chautauqua, Cowley.
Texas:
Fannin, Grayson, Lamar, Red River.
All other information in the original
declaration remains unchanged.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008)
Anderson, Cherokee, Greenville,
Laurens, Oconee, Pickens
Spartanburg.
The Interest Rates are:
address is U.S. Department of State, SA–
44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700,
Washington, DC 20547–0001.
Percent
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available
Elsewhere .................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere .........................
5.000
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
4.000
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 10367.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 59008)
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–1764 Filed 2–8–06; 8:45 am]
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–1765 Filed 2–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Disaster Declaration # 10367]
[Public Notice 5299]
South Carolina Disaster # SC–00001
Culturally Significant Objects Imported
for Exhibition Determinations:
‘‘Hokusai’’
Small Business Administration.
Notice.
AGENCY:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for Public Assistance Only for
the State of South Carolina ( FEMA–
1625–DR), dated 01/20/2006.
Incident: Severe Ice Storm.
Incident Period: 12/15/2005 through
12/16/2005.
Effective Date: 01/20/2006.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 03/21/2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, National Processing
And Disbursement Center, 14925
Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
President’s major disaster declaration on
01/20/2006, applications for Private
Non-Profit organizations that provide
essential services of a governmental
nature may file disaster loan
applications at the address listed above
or other locally announced locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Counties:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:56 Feb 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
Dated: February 3, 2006.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. E6–1790 Filed 2–8–06; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March
27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority
No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as
amended, and Delegation of Authority
No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875],
I hereby determine that the objects to be
included in the exhibition ‘‘Hokusai,’’
imported from abroad for temporary
exhibition within the United States, are
of cultural significance. The objects are
imported pursuant to loan agreements
with the foreign owners or custodians.
I also determine that the exhibition or
display of the exhibit objects at the
Arthur M. Sackler Gallery of the
Smithsonian Institution, from on or
about March 4, 2006, until on or about
May 14, 2006, and at possible additional
venues yet to be determined, is in the
national interest. Public Notice of these
Determinations is ordered to be
published in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, including a list of
the exhibit objects, contact Julianne
Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of
the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of
State (telephone: 202/453–8049). The
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Public Notice 5300]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: Two Summer Institutes for
European Student Leaders
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
A/E/EUR–06–06.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates: July 6, 2006–March 23,
2007.
Application Deadline: March 23,
2006.
SUMMARY: The Office of Academic
Exchange Programs, European and
Eurasian Programs Branch (ECA/A/E/
EUR) announces an open competition
for two separate Summer Institutes for
European Student Leaders. Accredited,
post-secondary educational institutions
in the United States may submit
proposals for two six-week summer
institutes, which will be similar in
content, but differ in terms of the
language abilities of the participants.
The participants in one institute will
have a high fluency level in English,
and the participants in the other
institute will have mid-level language
abilities. Each institute will begin with
English language instruction
appropriate to the participants and then
offer a core program that promotes
leadership development and civic
engagement through courses that will be
valuable to the participants in future
academic and work careers. Each
institute will host up to 20 participants
from Denmark, France, Germany,
Netherlands, Spain, and United
Kingdom who are either recent high
school graduates enrolled in universities
for the fall 2006 or first and second year
undergraduate students. Participants
will be between 17 and 23 years of age.
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) anticipates awarding two
separate assistance awards to support
these two programs. Organizations may
submit separate proposals for each
program. However, ECA will award no
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 27 / Thursday, February 9, 2006 / Notices
more than one grant to administer a
Summer Institute per U.S. institution.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Authority: Overall grant making authority
for this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of
1961, Public Law 87–256, as amended, also
known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The
purpose of the Act is ‘‘to enable the
Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of
the United States and the people of other
countries * * * to strengthen the ties which
unite us with other nations by demonstrating
the educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other nations
* * * and thus to assist in the development
of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and the
other countries of the world.’’ The funding
authority for the program above is provided
through legislation.
Purpose: The goal of the Summer
Institutes for European Student Leaders
is to provide young Europeans from
non-privileged backgrounds, and from
all sectors of the six participating
countries, with the opportunity to learn
about America, and to participate in
coursework that will serve them well in
their future academic and work careers
as well as provide training that will
enhance their leadership abilities for
their local communities. At the same
time the students will become familiar
with U.S. campus life, meet a variety of
U.S. citizens and have a valuable
cultural experience. American
institutions of higher education having
experience in hosting international
students for special programs may apply
to develop, administer and provide
follow-up to the six-week summer
program.
Guidelines: The program should be
designed to support the following
specific activities/components:
(a) An intensive English program to
strengthen the language skills of those
participants with mid-level abilities
before undertaking the academic
program and/or complementary
academic activities including English
language studies for participants with
high fluency.
(b) An academic program that will
include English for specific purposes
such as Business English and offer
coursework in areas such as public
presentation/speaking, writing skills (on
the appropriate level), marketing/public
relations and computer classes. The
academic program should include
lectures as well as group discussions
and exercises focusing on topics such as
the essential attributes of leadership,
including ‘‘teambuilding,’’ effective
communication, and problem-solving
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:56 Feb 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
skills, and management skills for
diverse organizational settings. The
knowledge acquired in the academic
coursework should be applicable in the
academic and business worlds as well
as be useful for those involved in
leadership roles in student and/or
community activities.
(c) Structured cultural activities
planned within the six-week program to
facilitate interaction among the
European participants, American
students, faculty, administrators, and
the local community, including handson community service, to promote
mutual understanding between the
people of the United States and the
people of the six countries.
(d) Four highly qualified U.S.
mentors/escorts for each institute who
exhibit cultural sensitivity and an
understanding of the program’s
objectives, who should accompany the
student participants throughout the
entire program. These mentors/escorts
will take on the role of cultural
interpreters and help the participants to
network with other students and the
community at large. The mentors/
escorts must actively participate in
classroom sessions, reside with students
in dormitories or other
accommodations, direct cultural and
recreational activities during weekends,
and escort students during the
educational travel component.
(e) The creation of a website and a
listserv to facilitate follow-on
mentoring/participant networking
concerning final project implementation
and to continue a dialog on ideas
developed during the institute.
(f) Assistance to participants while in
the U.S. to select, purchase and ship
professional materials to use in followon activities in their home country.
(g) One post-institute alumni
workshop that will take place in Europe
in coordination with the six
participating Fulbright Commissions.
The beginning of the program should
focus on intensive English or special
programs for participants not needing
concentrated language study. This will
be the foundation for the following
academic program that should include
lectures as well as group discussions
and exercises focusing on English for
Specific Purposes and areas such as
leadership, public presentation/
speaking, writing skills (on the
appropriate level), marketing/public
relations, and computer classes. The
institute should incorporate a focus on
contemporary American life.
Applicants should take into account
that the participants may have limited
knowledge of the United States and
varying degrees of experience in
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6813
expressing their opinions in a classroom
environment, and should tailor their
proposed curriculum and classroom
activities accordingly. The language
ability will also vary, especially for the
institute for the mid-level/less fluent
participants. The host institution will be
required to develop a program that
provides ample time and opportunity
for discussion and interaction, not
simply standard lectures or broad
survey reading assignments. Local site
visits to primary and/or secondary
schools, other colleges, and research
institutions should be part of the
academic program.
The program should also include
opportunities for participants to meet
American citizens from a variety of
ethnic, religious, and socio-economic
backgrounds. The host institution
should make a special effort to provide
opportunities for the participants to
interact with their peers in the United
States on a regular basis, and to speak
to appropriate student and civic groups
about their experiences and life in their
home countries.
Pending availability of FY 2006 funds,
the institute activities should begin on
or about July 6, 2006 with follow-up
activities to end before March 23, 2007.
Programs must comply with J–1 visa
regulations. Please refer to the
Solicitation Package for further
information.
Program Administration: All Summer
Institute programming and
administrative logistics, management of
the intensive English and academic
programs, field trips, and on-site
arrangements will be the responsibility
of the institute grantee. The grantee
organization is also responsible for
arrangements for lodging, food,
maintenance and local travel for
participants while in the U.S. The
grantee organization should strive to
balance cost-effectiveness in
accommodations and meal plans with
flexibility for differing diets and
individual needs of the participants.
The participating Fulbright
Commissions in Europe will handle the
cost of and ticketing for international
travel.
The project will provide each
participant with a supplemental book
allowance of $200 per person. The
grantee organization should plan to
assist participants in selection,
acquisition and shipment of materials to
their home countries. The grantee
organization should also arrange for
institutional or publishers’ discounts for
participants, as possible.
Proposals should describe the
available health care system and the
plan to provide health care access to
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
6814
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 27 / Thursday, February 9, 2006 / Notices
institute participants. The Department
of State will provide limited health
insurance coverage to all participants.
Participant Selection: Participants
will be selected by ECA based on
nominations from six participating
Fulbright Commissions. Minimum
qualifications for all participants will be
(1) adequate proficiency in English to
allow full participation in and benefit
from the program, (2) enrollment or
plans to enroll in higher education
programs in Europe, (3) high level of
academic achievement, as indicated by
academic grades, awards, and teacher
recommendations, and (4)
demonstration of a commitment to
community and university activities in
their home countries. Program
participants will be selected on the basis
of their demonstrated leadership
capacity. Participants will enter the
United States on J-visas, using DS–2019
forms issued by ECA.
Orientation: The grantee organization
will provide general pre-departure
orientation materials for all participants
prior to their travel to the United States.
This material might include a tentative
program outline with suggested goals
and objectives, relevant background
information about the U.S. institution
and individuals involved in the project,
and information concerning arrival in
the host city, local housing, climate, and
available services at the host institution.
Needs Assessment: The U.S.
institution should conduct an initial
needs assessment of participants upon
arrival in the United States and should
be prepared to adjust program emphasis
as necessary, particularly to respond to
participants’ language abilities in the
institute for less fluent participants.
• Cooperative Agreement: In a
cooperative agreement, ECA/A/E/EUR is
substantially involved in program
activities above and beyond routine
grant monitoring. ECA/A/E/EUR
activities and responsibilities for this
program are as follows:
• Participants will be selected by ECA
based on nominations from the
participating Fulbright Commissions.
• Participants will enter the United
States on J-visas, using DS–2019 forms
issued by ECA.
• The Fulbright Commissions will
arrange participants’ international
travel.
• ECA/A/E/EUR will facilitate
sending pre-arrival orientation materials
electronically to participants via the
participating Fulbright Commissions.
ECA/A/E/EUR will provide the host
institution with participants’ curricula
vitae and travel itineraries and will be
available to offer guidance throughout
the duration of the program.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:56 Feb 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
Proposal Contents: Applicants should
submit a complete and thorough
proposal describing the program in a
convincing and comprehensive manner.
Applicants may submit separate
proposals for each program if they wish.
However, ECA will award no more than
one grant per institution. Since there is
no opportunity for applicants to meet
with reviewing officials, the proposal
should respond to the criteria set forth
in the solicitation and other guidelines
as clearly as possible.
The proposal should address
succinctly, but completely, the elements
described below and must follow all
format requirements. The proposal
should include the following items:
TAB A—SF–424, ‘‘Application for
Federal Assistance.’’
TAB B—Executive Summary.
In one double-space page, provide the
following information about the project:
1. Name of organization/participating
institutions.
2. Beginning and ending dates of the
program.
3. Proposed theme.
4. Nature of activity.
5. Funding level requested from the
Bureau, total program cost, total cost
sharing from the applicant and other
sources.
6. Scope and goals: Include (a) the
number and description of participants;
(b) describe the wider audience
benefiting from the program (overall
impact); and (c) anticipated results
(short and long term).
TAB C—Narrative and Calendar of
activities.
In 20 pages provide a detailed
description of the project addressing the
areas listed below.
1. Vision (statement of need,
objectives, goals, benefits).
2. Participating Organizations.
3. Program Activities (orientation,
intensive English, academic component,
cultural program, participant
monitoring, opening and closing
events).
4. Program Evaluation.
5. Follow-on activities and a visit to
home work site(s) of selected
participants.
6. Project Management.
7. Work Plan/Time Frame.
Please refer to the Proposal
Submission Instruction (PSI) document
for technical format and instructions.
TAB D—Budget Submission.
The cost to the Bureau for the
Summer Institutes for European Student
Leaders should not exceed $170,000.
The budget should be developed for 20
participants.
Please see section IV.3e and the
Guidelines for Assistance Award
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Proposals and Budget Guidelines in
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
in regard to a Summary Budget and a
detailed Line-Item Budget. Use notes
where further explanation of line items
is required to clarify how the figures
were derived.
TAB E—Letters of endorsement and
´
resumes.
´
Resumes of all program staff should
be included in the submission. No
resume should exceed two pages.
TAB F.—SF–424B ‘‘AssurancesNonconstruction Programs.’’
First time applicant organizations and
organizations which have not received
an assistance award (grant or
cooperative agreement) from the Bureau
during the past three (3) years, must
submit as an attachment to this form the
following: (a) One copy of their Charter
OR Articles of Incorporation; (b) A list
of the current Board of Directors: and (c)
current financial statements.
Include other attachments, if
applicable.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement. ECA’s level of involvement
in this program is listed under number
I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2006.
Approximate Total Funding:
$340,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: Two
(2)—However, organizations may
receive no more than one grant of up to
$170,000.
Approximate Average Award:
$170,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending
availability of funds, May 30, 2006.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
March 23, 2007.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants: Applications
may be submitted by public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 27 / Thursday, February 9, 2006 / Notices
costs that are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
Bureau grant guidelines require that
organizations with less than four years
experience in conducting international
exchanges be limited to $60,000 in
Bureau funding. ECA anticipates
awarding two grants, in an amount up
to $170,000 each to support program
and administrative costs required to
implement this exchange program.
Therefore, organizations with less than
four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to
apply under this competition.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1. Contact Information To Request
an Application Package: Please contact
the Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, ECA/A/E/EUR, Senior Program
Manager Ilo-Mai Harding at Room 246,
U.S. Department of State, SA–44, 301
4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547,
Tel: (202) 453–8522; Fax: (202) 453–
8520; or E-mail address:
hardingim@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please specify IloMai Harding and refer to the Funding
Opportunity Number ECA/A/E/EUR–
06–06 located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet: The entire
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:56 Feb 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
Solicitation Package may be
downloaded from the Bureau’s Web site
at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
rfgps/menu.htm, or from the Grants.gov
Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be sent per the
instructions under IV.3f. ‘‘Application
Deadline and Methods of Submission’’
below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa: The Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs is
placing renewed emphasis on the secure
and proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by grantees and sponsors to all
regulations governing the J visa.
Therefore, proposals should
demonstrate the applicant’s capacity to
meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62,
including the oversight of Responsible
Officers and Alternate Responsible
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6815
Officers, screening and selection of
program participants, provision of prearrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, record-keeping, reporting and
other requirements.
ECA will be responsible for issuing
DS–2019 forms to participants in this
program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD—SA–44,
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547. Telephone:
(202) 203–5029. FAX: (202) 453–8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for
further information.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted
in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in
program administration and in program
content. Please refer to the review
criteria under the ‘‘Support for
Diversity’’ section for specific
suggestions on incorporating diversity
into your proposal. Public Law 104–319
provides that ‘‘in carrying out programs
of educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully
enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the
Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to
provide opportunities for participation
in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation: Proposals must include a
plan to monitor and evaluate the
project’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives. The Bureau expects that the
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
6816
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 27 / Thursday, February 9, 2006 / Notices
grantee will track participants or
partners and be able to respond to key
evaluation questions, including
satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in
behavior as a result of the program, and
effects of the program on institutions
(institutions in which participants work
or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that
measure gains in mutual understanding
as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable,
attainable, results-oriented, and placed
in a reasonable time frame), the easier
it will be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:56 Feb 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected,
including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a
minimum of three years and provided to
the Bureau upon request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for
overall program management, staffing
and coordination with ECA/A/E/EUR:
ECA/A/E/EUR considers program
management, staffing and coordination
with the Department of State essential
elements of your program. Please give
sufficient attention to these elements in
your proposal. Please refer to the
Technical Eligibility Requirements in
the Solicitation package for specific
guidelines.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a
comprehensive budget for each
program. Awards may not exceed
$170,000. There must be a summary
budget as well as breakdowns reflecting
both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide
separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity
to provide clarification. Proposals
should try to maximize cost sharing in
all facets of the program and to
stimulate U.S. private sector, including
foundation and corporate support. The
Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in
accordance with the needs of the
program and availability of U.S.
government funding.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
1. Instructional costs (for example:
instructors’ salaries, honoraria for
outside speakers, educational course
materials);
2. Lodging, meals, and incidentals for
participants;
3. Expenses associated with cultural
activities planned for the group of
participants (for example: tickets,
transportation);
4. Administrative costs as necessary;
5. U.S. ground transportation costs to
U.S. appointments, meetings and to/
from airports.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3e.3. Divide the line-item budget
into Program and Administration
sections. The line-item budget should
include and elaborate on the categories
listed below.
Program Costs: The Institution may
choose to itemize academic program
costs or set a fee per participant. The
following may be included as itemized
instruction costs:
a. Honoraria and per diem for outside
speakers, if any. List names and
amounts.
b. Film and video rentals, educational
materials, curricular needs (i.e. texts,
course packs for classes) as needed.
If the institution chooses to budget
instruction costs as a fee per participant,
please state what services are provided
within that fee, and only actual costs
incurred are chargeable to the award.
Clearly indicate the unit cost for each
item listed below:
1. Lodging. Housing may be in
graduate dormitories, faculty residence,
or other, as appropriate. Single rooms
preferred.
2. Meals. Meals may be provided
through cash subsistence payments to
participants, cafeteria meal plans, or a
combination of both. If using a meal
plan exclusively, show clearly how the
cost of meals will be covered if
participants travel away from campus or
campus cafeterias are closed.
3. Incidentals allowance. Include an
incidentals allowance of $10 per person
per day for full number of days of the
Summer Institute at the host institution.
4. Supplemental book allowance of
$200 per person.
5. Return shipping allowance $150
per person.
6. Lodging, meals and incidentals
allowances for participants who must
arrive before the institute formally
begins and/or depart after the institute
formally ends, due to airline schedules
in their home countries.
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 27 / Thursday, February 9, 2006 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Note: Per Diem rate for lodging and meals
may not exceed published U.S. government
allowance rates for the site of the institute.
Applicants may use per diem rates that are
lower than official government rates.
Cultural activities and other program
costs may include the following:
1. Cultural activities: Entrance fees,
overnight lodging, and meals not
previously listed.
2. Costs for cultural and educational
tour: Include participant lodging
(double rooms are acceptable); meals for
participants.
3. Transportation: Ground
transportation for group cultural and
educational activities; ground
transportation for airport arrivals and
departures. Note: The Fulbright
Commissions will provide round-trip
international air tickets (from the home
country to the institute site and return
to the home country) for participants.
The cost of airline travel for participants
should not be included in the budget.
4. Per diem (or lodging and
subsistence) and travel for grantee escort
staff for overnight cultural activities in
the institute’s home region. Note: Per
Diem rate for lodging and meals may not
exceed published U.S. government
allowance rates for the site of the
institute. Applicants may use per diem
rates that are lower than official
government rates.
5. Costs associated with post-institute
implementation/ evaluation site visit to
Europe.
Administration Costs should include
the following:
A. Staff requirements.
B. Benefits.
C. Other directly administrative
expenses.
D. Indirect expenses.
Please review carefully the Guidelines
for Assistance Award Proposals and
Budget Guidelines in Proposal
Submission Instructions (PSI) for
descriptions and limitations for each
type of administrative cost.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: March 23,
2006.
Reference Number: ECA/A/E/EUR–
06–06.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:56 Feb 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
6817
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed
Applications:
Applications must be shipped no later
than the above deadline. Delivery
services used by applicants must have
in-place, centralized shipping
identification and tracking systems that
may be accessed via the Internet and
delivery people who are identifiable by
commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on
or before the above deadline but
received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for
further consideration under this
competition. Proposals shipped after the
established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
date will be automatically rejected by
the grants.gov system, and will be
technically ineligible.
Applicants will receive a
confirmation e-mail from grants.gov
upon the successful submission of an
application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the program
conceptualization and planning:
Proposals should exhibit originality,
substance, precision, and relevance to
the Bureau’s mission of mutual
understanding as well as adherence to
all guidelines, goals and objectives
described in the RFGP. The proposal
should demonstrate effective use of
community and regional resources to
enhance the cultural and educational
experiences of the participants. A
relevant work plan and detailed
calendar should demonstrate
substantive undertakings and logistical
capacity.
2. Institutional Capacity: Proposed
personnel and institutional resources
should be adequate and appropriate to
achieve a substantive academic program
and effective cross-cultural
communication with U.S. students.
Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The original and eight copies of the
application should be sent to: U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.:
ECA/A/E/EUR–06–06, Program
Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547.
IV.3f.2—Submitting Electronic
Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
solicitation packages are available at
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system. Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.) of the closing date to ensure that
their entire applications have been
uploaded to the grants.gov site.
Applications uploaded to the site after
midnight of the application deadline
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process: The Bureau will
review all proposals for technical
eligibility. Proposals will be deemed
ineligible if they do not fully adhere to
the guidelines stated herein and in the
Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the
program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance
awards cooperative agreements resides
with the Bureau’s Grants Officer.
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
6818
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 27 / Thursday, February 9, 2006 / Notices
compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants.
The proposal should show evidence of
strong on-site administrative
capabilities with specific discussion of
how logistical arrangements will be
undertaken.
3. Multiplier effect/impact: Proposed
programs should strengthen long-term
mutual understanding, including
maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional
and individual linkages.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Program administrators should strive for
diversity among institute staff,
university students, the host community
who interact with participants, and the
cultural component of the program.
5. Follow-on Activities: Proposals
should provide a plan for continued
follow-on activity (without Bureau
support) ensuring that Bureau
supported programs are not isolated
events.
6. Project Evaluation: Proposals
should include a plan to evaluate the
activity’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program. A
draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives are
recommended.
7. Cost-effectiveness: The overhead
and administrative components of the
proposal, including salaries and
honoraria, should be kept as low as
possible. All other items should be
necessary and appropriate.
8. Cost-sharing: Proposals should
maximize cost sharing through other
private sector support as well as
institutional direct funding
contributions.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards
cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and
committed through internal Bureau
procedures. Successful applicants will
receive an Assistance Award Document
(AAD) from the Bureau’s Grants Office.
The AAD and the original grant
proposal with subsequent modifications
(if applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the
recipient and the U.S. Government. The
AAD will be signed by an authorized
Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient’s responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:56 Feb 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of
ECA agreements include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and
Other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
grants.
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus two copies a final program
and financial report no more than 90
days after the expiration of the award.
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. (Please refer to IV.
Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VI.4. Program Data Requirements:
Organizations awarded grants will be
required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact
information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on
funds provided by the grant or who
benefit from the grant funding but do
not travel.
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(2) Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three workdays prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Ilo-Mai
Harding, European and Eurasian
Programs Branch, ECA/A/E/EUR, Room
246, ECA/A/E/EUR–06–06, U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, Tel:
(202) 453–8522; Fax: (202) 453–8520; or
E-mail address: hardingim@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/A/E/
EUR–06–06.
Please read the complete Federal
Register announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once
the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau
staff may not discuss this competition
with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: February 2, 2006.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–1789 Filed 2–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Meetings; Sunshine Act
Tennessee
Valley Authority (Meeting No. 1562).
TIME AND DATE: 1 p.m. (EST), February
13, 2006. TVA West Tower Auditorium,
400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville,
Tennessee.
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6812-6818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1789]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5300]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: Two Summer Institutes for European Student Leaders
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/A/E/EUR-06-06.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates: July 6, 2006-March 23, 2007.
Application Deadline: March 23, 2006.
SUMMARY: The Office of Academic Exchange Programs, European and
Eurasian Programs Branch (ECA/A/E/EUR) announces an open competition
for two separate Summer Institutes for European Student Leaders.
Accredited, post-secondary educational institutions in the United
States may submit proposals for two six-week summer institutes, which
will be similar in content, but differ in terms of the language
abilities of the participants. The participants in one institute will
have a high fluency level in English, and the participants in the other
institute will have mid-level language abilities. Each institute will
begin with English language instruction appropriate to the participants
and then offer a core program that promotes leadership development and
civic engagement through courses that will be valuable to the
participants in future academic and work careers. Each institute will
host up to 20 participants from Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands,
Spain, and United Kingdom who are either recent high school graduates
enrolled in universities for the fall 2006 or first and second year
undergraduate students. Participants will be between 17 and 23 years of
age. The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) anticipates
awarding two separate assistance awards to support these two programs.
Organizations may submit separate proposals for each program. However,
ECA will award no
[[Page 6813]]
more than one grant to administer a Summer Institute per U.S.
institution.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making authority for this program is
contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of
1961, Public Law 87-256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-
Hays Act. The purpose of the Act is ``to enable the Government of
the United States to increase mutual understanding between the
people of the United States and the people of other countries * * *
to strengthen the ties which unite us with other nations by
demonstrating the educational and cultural interests, developments,
and achievements of the people of the United States and other
nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of friendly,
sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States and the
other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Purpose: The goal of the Summer Institutes for European Student
Leaders is to provide young Europeans from non-privileged backgrounds,
and from all sectors of the six participating countries, with the
opportunity to learn about America, and to participate in coursework
that will serve them well in their future academic and work careers as
well as provide training that will enhance their leadership abilities
for their local communities. At the same time the students will become
familiar with U.S. campus life, meet a variety of U.S. citizens and
have a valuable cultural experience. American institutions of higher
education having experience in hosting international students for
special programs may apply to develop, administer and provide follow-up
to the six-week summer program.
Guidelines: The program should be designed to support the following
specific activities/components:
(a) An intensive English program to strengthen the language skills
of those participants with mid-level abilities before undertaking the
academic program and/or complementary academic activities including
English language studies for participants with high fluency.
(b) An academic program that will include English for specific
purposes such as Business English and offer coursework in areas such as
public presentation/speaking, writing skills (on the appropriate
level), marketing/public relations and computer classes. The academic
program should include lectures as well as group discussions and
exercises focusing on topics such as the essential attributes of
leadership, including ``teambuilding,'' effective communication, and
problem-solving skills, and management skills for diverse
organizational settings. The knowledge acquired in the academic
coursework should be applicable in the academic and business worlds as
well as be useful for those involved in leadership roles in student
and/or community activities.
(c) Structured cultural activities planned within the six-week
program to facilitate interaction among the European participants,
American students, faculty, administrators, and the local community,
including hands-on community service, to promote mutual understanding
between the people of the United States and the people of the six
countries.
(d) Four highly qualified U.S. mentors/escorts for each institute
who exhibit cultural sensitivity and an understanding of the program's
objectives, who should accompany the student participants throughout
the entire program. These mentors/escorts will take on the role of
cultural interpreters and help the participants to network with other
students and the community at large. The mentors/escorts must actively
participate in classroom sessions, reside with students in dormitories
or other accommodations, direct cultural and recreational activities
during weekends, and escort students during the educational travel
component.
(e) The creation of a website and a listserv to facilitate follow-
on mentoring/participant networking concerning final project
implementation and to continue a dialog on ideas developed during the
institute.
(f) Assistance to participants while in the U.S. to select,
purchase and ship professional materials to use in follow-on activities
in their home country.
(g) One post-institute alumni workshop that will take place in
Europe in coordination with the six participating Fulbright
Commissions.
The beginning of the program should focus on intensive English or
special programs for participants not needing concentrated language
study. This will be the foundation for the following academic program
that should include lectures as well as group discussions and exercises
focusing on English for Specific Purposes and areas such as leadership,
public presentation/speaking, writing skills (on the appropriate
level), marketing/public relations, and computer classes. The institute
should incorporate a focus on contemporary American life.
Applicants should take into account that the participants may have
limited knowledge of the United States and varying degrees of
experience in expressing their opinions in a classroom environment, and
should tailor their proposed curriculum and classroom activities
accordingly. The language ability will also vary, especially for the
institute for the mid-level/less fluent participants. The host
institution will be required to develop a program that provides ample
time and opportunity for discussion and interaction, not simply
standard lectures or broad survey reading assignments. Local site
visits to primary and/or secondary schools, other colleges, and
research institutions should be part of the academic program.
The program should also include opportunities for participants to
meet American citizens from a variety of ethnic, religious, and socio-
economic backgrounds. The host institution should make a special effort
to provide opportunities for the participants to interact with their
peers in the United States on a regular basis, and to speak to
appropriate student and civic groups about their experiences and life
in their home countries.
Pending availability of FY 2006 funds, the institute activities
should begin on or about July 6, 2006 with follow-up activities to end
before March 23, 2007.
Programs must comply with J-1 visa regulations. Please refer to the
Solicitation Package for further information.
Program Administration: All Summer Institute programming and
administrative logistics, management of the intensive English and
academic programs, field trips, and on-site arrangements will be the
responsibility of the institute grantee. The grantee organization is
also responsible for arrangements for lodging, food, maintenance and
local travel for participants while in the U.S. The grantee
organization should strive to balance cost-effectiveness in
accommodations and meal plans with flexibility for differing diets and
individual needs of the participants.
The participating Fulbright Commissions in Europe will handle the
cost of and ticketing for international travel.
The project will provide each participant with a supplemental book
allowance of $200 per person. The grantee organization should plan to
assist participants in selection, acquisition and shipment of materials
to their home countries. The grantee organization should also arrange
for institutional or publishers' discounts for participants, as
possible.
Proposals should describe the available health care system and the
plan to provide health care access to
[[Page 6814]]
institute participants. The Department of State will provide limited
health insurance coverage to all participants.
Participant Selection: Participants will be selected by ECA based
on nominations from six participating Fulbright Commissions. Minimum
qualifications for all participants will be (1) adequate proficiency in
English to allow full participation in and benefit from the program,
(2) enrollment or plans to enroll in higher education programs in
Europe, (3) high level of academic achievement, as indicated by
academic grades, awards, and teacher recommendations, and (4)
demonstration of a commitment to community and university activities in
their home countries. Program participants will be selected on the
basis of their demonstrated leadership capacity. Participants will
enter the United States on J-visas, using DS-2019 forms issued by ECA.
Orientation: The grantee organization will provide general pre-
departure orientation materials for all participants prior to their
travel to the United States. This material might include a tentative
program outline with suggested goals and objectives, relevant
background information about the U.S. institution and individuals
involved in the project, and information concerning arrival in the host
city, local housing, climate, and available services at the host
institution.
Needs Assessment: The U.S. institution should conduct an initial
needs assessment of participants upon arrival in the United States and
should be prepared to adjust program emphasis as necessary,
particularly to respond to participants' language abilities in the
institute for less fluent participants.
Cooperative Agreement: In a cooperative agreement, ECA/A/
E/EUR is substantially involved in program activities above and beyond
routine grant monitoring. ECA/A/E/EUR activities and responsibilities
for this program are as follows:
Participants will be selected by ECA based on nominations
from the participating Fulbright Commissions.
Participants will enter the United States on J-visas,
using DS-2019 forms issued by ECA.
The Fulbright Commissions will arrange participants'
international travel.
ECA/A/E/EUR will facilitate sending pre-arrival
orientation materials electronically to participants via the
participating Fulbright Commissions.
ECA/A/E/EUR will provide the host institution with participants'
curricula vitae and travel itineraries and will be available to offer
guidance throughout the duration of the program.
Proposal Contents: Applicants should submit a complete and thorough
proposal describing the program in a convincing and comprehensive
manner. Applicants may submit separate proposals for each program if
they wish. However, ECA will award no more than one grant per
institution. Since there is no opportunity for applicants to meet with
reviewing officials, the proposal should respond to the criteria set
forth in the solicitation and other guidelines as clearly as possible.
The proposal should address succinctly, but completely, the
elements described below and must follow all format requirements. The
proposal should include the following items:
TAB A--SF-424, ``Application for Federal Assistance.''
TAB B--Executive Summary.
In one double-space page, provide the following information about
the project:
1. Name of organization/participating institutions.
2. Beginning and ending dates of the program.
3. Proposed theme.
4. Nature of activity.
5. Funding level requested from the Bureau, total program cost,
total cost sharing from the applicant and other sources.
6. Scope and goals: Include (a) the number and description of
participants; (b) describe the wider audience benefiting from the
program (overall impact); and (c) anticipated results (short and long
term).
TAB C--Narrative and Calendar of activities.
In 20 pages provide a detailed description of the project
addressing the areas listed below.
1. Vision (statement of need, objectives, goals, benefits).
2. Participating Organizations.
3. Program Activities (orientation, intensive English, academic
component, cultural program, participant monitoring, opening and
closing events).
4. Program Evaluation.
5. Follow-on activities and a visit to home work site(s) of
selected participants.
6. Project Management.
7. Work Plan/Time Frame.
Please refer to the Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI) document
for technical format and instructions.
TAB D--Budget Submission.
The cost to the Bureau for the Summer Institutes for European
Student Leaders should not exceed $170,000. The budget should be
developed for 20 participants.
Please see section IV.3e and the Guidelines for Assistance Award
Proposals and Budget Guidelines in Proposal Submission Instructions
(PSI) in regard to a Summary Budget and a detailed Line-Item Budget.
Use notes where further explanation of line items is required to
clarify how the figures were derived.
TAB E--Letters of endorsement and resum[eacute]s.
Resum[eacute]s of all program staff should be included in the
submission. No resume should exceed two pages.
TAB F.--SF-424B ``Assurances-Nonconstruction Programs.''
First time applicant organizations and organizations which have not
received an assistance award (grant or cooperative agreement) from the
Bureau during the past three (3) years, must submit as an attachment to
this form the following: (a) One copy of their Charter OR Articles of
Incorporation; (b) A list of the current Board of Directors: and (c)
current financial statements.
Include other attachments, if applicable.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. ECA's level of involvement in
this program is listed under number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2006.
Approximate Total Funding: $340,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: Two (2)--However, organizations may
receive no more than one grant of up to $170,000.
Approximate Average Award: $170,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, May 30,
2006.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: March 23, 2007.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants: Applications may be submitted by public
and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described
in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds: There is no minimum or
maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all
[[Page 6815]]
costs that are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be
paid by the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The
basis for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must
be in accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements: Bureau grant guidelines
require that organizations with less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges be limited to $60,000 in Bureau
funding. ECA anticipates awarding two grants, in an amount up to
$170,000 each to support program and administrative costs required to
implement this exchange program. Therefore, organizations with less
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges are
ineligible to apply under this competition.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an Application Package: Please
contact the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, ECA/A/E/EUR,
Senior Program Manager Ilo-Mai Harding at Room 246, U.S. Department of
State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, Tel: (202)
453-8522; Fax: (202) 453-8520; or E-mail address: hardingim@state.gov
to request a Solicitation Package. Please specify Ilo-Mai Harding and
refer to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/E/EUR-06-06 located at
the top of this announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web site at
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm, or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be
sent per the instructions under IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission'' below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not
received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three
years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS
within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation
to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to
do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa: The
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is placing renewed emphasis
on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J visa)
Programs and adherence by grantees and sponsors to all regulations
governing the J visa. Therefore, proposals should demonstrate the
applicant's capacity to meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth in 22 CFR
part 62, including the oversight of Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants,
monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms,
record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.
ECA will be responsible for issuing DS-2019 forms to participants
in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://
exchanges.state.gov or from: United States Department of State, Office
of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD--SA-44, Room 734,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547. Telephone: (202) 203-5029.
FAX: (202) 453-8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for further information.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program administration and in program content. Please
refer to the review criteria under the ``Support for Diversity''
section for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your
proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in carrying out programs
of educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not
fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau ``shall take
appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.''
Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of the countries
described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection
process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their
program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation: Proposals must include
a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends
that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes
to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the
[[Page 6816]]
grantee will track participants or partners and be able to respond to
key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of
the program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions
in which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that measure gains in mutual
understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey responses and contact information,
must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the
Bureau upon request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for overall program management,
staffing and coordination with ECA/A/E/EUR: ECA/A/E/EUR considers
program management, staffing and coordination with the Department of
State essential elements of your program. Please give sufficient
attention to these elements in your proposal. Please refer to the
Technical Eligibility Requirements in the Solicitation package for
specific guidelines.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a comprehensive budget for each
program. Awards may not exceed $170,000. There must be a summary budget
as well as breakdowns reflecting both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity to provide clarification.
Proposals should try to maximize cost sharing in all facets of the
program and to stimulate U.S. private sector, including foundation and
corporate support. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of the program
and availability of U.S. government funding.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
1. Instructional costs (for example: instructors' salaries,
honoraria for outside speakers, educational course materials);
2. Lodging, meals, and incidentals for participants;
3. Expenses associated with cultural activities planned for the
group of participants (for example: tickets, transportation);
4. Administrative costs as necessary;
5. U.S. ground transportation costs to U.S. appointments, meetings
and to/from airports.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3e.3. Divide the line-item budget into Program and
Administration sections. The line-item budget should include and
elaborate on the categories listed below.
Program Costs: The Institution may choose to itemize academic
program costs or set a fee per participant. The following may be
included as itemized instruction costs:
a. Honoraria and per diem for outside speakers, if any. List names
and amounts.
b. Film and video rentals, educational materials, curricular needs
(i.e. texts, course packs for classes) as needed.
If the institution chooses to budget instruction costs as a fee per
participant, please state what services are provided within that fee,
and only actual costs incurred are chargeable to the award.
Clearly indicate the unit cost for each item listed below:
1. Lodging. Housing may be in graduate dormitories, faculty
residence, or other, as appropriate. Single rooms preferred.
2. Meals. Meals may be provided through cash subsistence payments
to participants, cafeteria meal plans, or a combination of both. If
using a meal plan exclusively, show clearly how the cost of meals will
be covered if participants travel away from campus or campus cafeterias
are closed.
3. Incidentals allowance. Include an incidentals allowance of $10
per person per day for full number of days of the Summer Institute at
the host institution.
4. Supplemental book allowance of $200 per person.
5. Return shipping allowance $150 per person.
6. Lodging, meals and incidentals allowances for participants who
must arrive before the institute formally begins and/or depart after
the institute formally ends, due to airline schedules in their home
countries.
[[Page 6817]]
Note: Per Diem rate for lodging and meals may not exceed
published U.S. government allowance rates for the site of the
institute. Applicants may use per diem rates that are lower than
official government rates.
Cultural activities and other program costs may include the
following:
1. Cultural activities: Entrance fees, overnight lodging, and meals
not previously listed.
2. Costs for cultural and educational tour: Include participant
lodging (double rooms are acceptable); meals for participants.
3. Transportation: Ground transportation for group cultural and
educational activities; ground transportation for airport arrivals and
departures. Note: The Fulbright Commissions will provide round-trip
international air tickets (from the home country to the institute site
and return to the home country) for participants. The cost of airline
travel for participants should not be included in the budget.
4. Per diem (or lodging and subsistence) and travel for grantee
escort staff for overnight cultural activities in the institute's home
region. Note: Per Diem rate for lodging and meals may not exceed
published U.S. government allowance rates for the site of the
institute. Applicants may use per diem rates that are lower than
official government rates.
5. Costs associated with post-institute implementation/ evaluation
site visit to Europe.
Administration Costs should include the following:
A. Staff requirements.
B. Benefits.
C. Other directly administrative expenses.
D. Indirect expenses.
Please review carefully the Guidelines for Assistance Award
Proposals and Budget Guidelines in Proposal Submission Instructions
(PSI) for descriptions and limitations for each type of administrative
cost.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: March 23, 2006.
Reference Number: ECA/A/E/EUR-06-06.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S.
Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications:
Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline.
Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized
shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via
the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or
before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for further consideration under
this competition. Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are
ineligible for consideration under this competition. ECA will not
notify you upon receipt of application. It is each applicant's
responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the
Internet. Delivery of proposal packages may not be made via local
courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will
not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as stated above
will be considered.
Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation
Package.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation
Package. The original and eight copies of the application should be
sent to: U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Ref.: ECA/A/E/EUR-06-06, Program Management, ECA/EX/
PM, Room 534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
IV.3f.2--Submitting Electronic Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation packages are available
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system. Please follow the
instructions available in the `Get Started' portion of the site (http:/
/www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.) of the closing date to
ensure that their entire applications have been uploaded to the
grants.gov site. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process: The Bureau will review all proposals for
technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do
not fully adhere to the guidelines stated herein and in the
Solicitation Package. All eligible proposals will be reviewed by the
program office, as well as the Public Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be subject to compliance with
Federal and Bureau regulations and guidelines and forwarded to Bureau
grant panels for advisory review. Proposals may also be reviewed by the
Office of the Legal Adviser or by other Department elements. Final
funding decisions are at the discretion of the Department of State's
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance awards cooperative agreements
resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the program conceptualization and planning: Proposals
should exhibit originality, substance, precision, and relevance to the
Bureau's mission of mutual understanding as well as adherence to all
guidelines, goals and objectives described in the RFGP. The proposal
should demonstrate effective use of community and regional resources to
enhance the cultural and educational experiences of the participants. A
relevant work plan and detailed calendar should demonstrate substantive
undertakings and logistical capacity.
2. Institutional Capacity: Proposed personnel and institutional
resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve a substantive
academic program and effective cross-cultural communication with U.S.
students. Proposals should demonstrate an institutional record of
successful exchange programs, including responsible fiscal management
and full
[[Page 6818]]
compliance with all reporting requirements for past Bureau grants. The
proposal should show evidence of strong on-site administrative
capabilities with specific discussion of how logistical arrangements
will be undertaken.
3. Multiplier effect/impact: Proposed programs should strengthen
long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of
information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual
linkages.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Program administrators
should strive for diversity among institute staff, university students,
the host community who interact with participants, and the cultural
component of the program.
5. Follow-on Activities: Proposals should provide a plan for
continued follow-on activity (without Bureau support) ensuring that
Bureau supported programs are not isolated events.
6. Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate
the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus
description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original
project objectives are recommended.
7. Cost-effectiveness: The overhead and administrative components
of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be kept as
low as possible. All other items should be necessary and appropriate.
8. Cost-sharing: Proposals should maximize cost sharing through
other private sector support as well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards cannot be made until funds have
been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal
Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive an Assistance
Award Document (AAD) from the Bureau's Grants Office. The AAD and the
original grant proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient
and the U.S. Government. The AAD will be signed by an authorized Grants
Officer, and mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements include the
following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants-
in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and Non-
profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus two copies a final program and financial report no more
than 90 days after the expiration of the award.
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports.
(Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3)
above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VI.4. Program Data Requirements: Organizations awarded grants will
be required to maintain specific data on program participants and
activities in an electronically accessible database format that can be
shared with the Bureau as required. As a minimum, the data must include
the following:
(1) Name, address, contact information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the grant or
who benefit from the grant funding but do not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing
dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take
place. Final schedules for in country and U.S. activities must be
received by the ECA Program Officer at least three workdays prior to
the official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Ilo-Mai Harding,
European and Eurasian Programs Branch, ECA/A/E/EUR, Room 246, ECA/A/E/
EUR-06-06, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, Tel: (202) 453-8522; Fax: (202) 453-8520; or E-
mail address: hardingim@state.gov. All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference the above title and number ECA/A/
E/EUR-06-06.
Please read the complete Federal Register announcement before
sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: February 2, 2006.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6-1789 Filed 2-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P