Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes, 6411-6413 [E6-1684]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Modification
(g) For Model DHC–8–102, –103, and –106
airplanes; and Model DHC–8–200 series
airplanes: Within 36 months after March 19,
2004 (the effective date of AD 2004–03–15),
modify the electrical wires in the cable
trough below the cabin floor at Sections
X510.00 to X580.50 (including performing a
general visual inspection and any applicable
repair), in accordance with Part III,
paragraphs 1 through 9 and 12 through 20,
of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 8–53–80,
Revision ‘‘A,’’ dated July 25, 2000. Any
applicable repair must be done before further
flight. Accomplishment of these actions
before March 19, 2004, in accordance with
Bombardier Service Bulletin 8–53–80, dated
December 22, 1999, is considered acceptable
for compliance with the actions required by
this paragraph.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Related Information
(i) Canadian airworthiness directive CF–
1998–08R2, dated July 10, 2000, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
January 30, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–1683 Filed 2–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
Comments Invited
[Docket No. FAA–2006–23798; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–162–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier
Model DHC–8–400 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier Model DHC–8–400
series airplanes. This proposed AD
would require replacing all domed
anchor nuts at all attachment locations
of the upper fuel access panels of the
center wing in the wet bay location with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:52 Feb 07, 2006
new nuts. This proposed AD results
from reported cases of corroded dome
anchor nuts at the attachment locations
of the upper surface of the fuel access
panel of the center wing. We are
proposing this AD to prevent corrosion
or perforation of domed anchor nuts,
which could result in arcing and
ignition of fuel vapor in the center wing
fuel tank during a lightning strike and
consequent explosion of the fuel tank.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 10, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to http:
//dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier
Regional Aircraft Division, 123 Garratt
Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K
1Y5, Canada, for service information
identified in this proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Duckett, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE–
171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone (516) 228–7525; fax
(516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 208001
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2006–23798; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–162–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6411
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the airworthiness
authority for Canada, notified us that an
unsafe condition may exist on certain
Bombardier Model DHC–8–400 series
airplanes. TCCA advises that, during
‘‘2C’’ checks, there have been a number
of reported cases of corrosion of dome
anchor nuts at the attachment locations
of the upper surface of the fuel access
panel of the center wing. In some cases,
the dome anchor nuts were severely
corroded and perforated. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in arcing and ignition of fuel vapor in
the center wing fuel tank during a
lightning strike and consequent
explosion of the fuel tank.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued Service
Bulletin 84–57–10, Revision ‘‘A,’’ dated
March 14, 2005. The service bulletin
describes procedures for replacing all
domed anchor nuts at all attachment
locations of the upper fuel access panels
of the center wing in the wet bay
location with new, corrosion-resistant
anchor nuts. Accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information is
intended to adequately address the
unsafe condition.
The TCCA mandated the service
information described previously, or
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–57–11,
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
6412
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules
dated February 25, 2004, or Revision
‘‘A,’’ dated March 9, 2004; and
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–57–12,
dated March 11, 2005. The TCCA also
issued Canadian airworthiness directive
CF–2005–08R1, issued August 10, 2005,
to ensure the continued airworthiness of
these airplanes in Canada.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
These airplane models are
manufactured in Canada and are type
certificated for operation in the United
States under the provisions of § 21.29 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.29) and the applicable bilateral
airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to
this bilateral airworthiness agreement,
the TCCA has kept the FAA informed of
the situation described above. We have
examined the TCCA’s findings,
evaluated all pertinent information, and
determined that we need to issue an AD
for airplanes of this type design that are
certificated for operation in the United
States.
Therefore, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the
actions specified in Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84–57–10, Revision ‘‘A,’’ dated
March 14, 2005.
Differences Between the Proposed AD
and the Canadian Airworthiness
Directive
Instead of doing the replacement
specified in Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84–57–10, Revision ‘‘A,’’ dated
March 14, 2005, Canadian airworthiness
directive mandates the inspections,
installation, and corrective actions if
necessary specified in Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–57–11, dated
February 25, 2004, or Revision ‘‘A,’’
dated March 9, 2004; and Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–57–12, dated March
11, 2005. The TCCA allows those
actions because of the limited
availability of new, corrosion-resistant
anchor nuts.
Since issuance of the Canadian
airworthiness directive, the TCCA has
advised us that corrosion-resistant
anchor nuts are now available.
Therefore, this proposed AD would
require only the replacement specified
in Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–57–
10. In addition, the Canadian
airworthiness directive requires the
replacement within 9 months after
April 27, 2005 (the effective date of the
Canadian airworthiness directive).
However, this proposed AD would
require the replacement within 3
months after the effective date of the
AD. Deterioration of anchor nuts over
time can cause the anchor nuts to
become perforated, which could result
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Feb 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
in a potential source of ignition in a fuel
tank and consequent fire or explosion.
Therefore, we have determined that a
compliance time of 3 months after the
effective date of this AD is the
maximum time allowable for all affected
airplanes to continue to operate without
compromising safety. TCCA agrees with
our decision to mandate that
replacement and to shorten the
compliance time, which will align
closer to their compliance date.
Bombardier has been contacted, and
they can support the part requirements.
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
Costs of Compliance
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
This proposed AD would affect about
20 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
proposed actions would take about 62
work hours per airplane, at an average
labor rate of $65 per work hour.
Required parts would cost about $300
per airplane. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the proposed AD for
U.S. operators is $86,600, or $4,330 per
airplane.
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly de Havilland,
Inc.): Docket No. FAA–2006–23798;
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–162–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by March 10, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model
DHC–8–400 series airplanes, certificated in
any category; serial numbers 4001, and 4003
through 4115 inclusive.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reported cases of
corroded dome anchor nuts at the attachment
locations of the upper surface of the fuel
access panel of the center wing. We are
issuing this AD to prevent corrosion or
perforation of domed anchor nuts, which
could result in arcing and ignition of fuel
vapor in the center wing fuel tank during a
lightning strike and consequent explosion of
the fuel tank.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Replacement With Corrosion Resistant
Anchor Nuts
(f) At the applicable time in Table 1 of this
AD, replace all domed anchor nuts at all
attachment locations of the upper fuel access
panels of the center wing in the wet bay
location with new, corrosion-resistant anchor
nuts. Do all the actions in accordance with
6413
the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–57–10,
Revision ‘A,’ dated March 14, 2005.
TABLE 1.—COMPLIANCE TIME
For airplanes having serial
number(s)
On which the inspection(s) specified in
Do the replacement
(1) 4108 through 4115 inclusive.
None ................................................................................
(2) 4001, and 4003 through
4107 inclusive.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–57–11, dated February
25, 2005; or Revision ‘A,’ dated March 9, 2005; have
been done before the effective date of this AD.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–57–12, dated March
11, 2005, has been done before the effective date of
this AD.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–57–11, dated February
25, 2005, or Revision ‘A,’ dated March 9, 2005; or
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–57–12, dated March
11, 2005; has not been done before the effective
date of this AD.
Within 48 months after the date of issuance of the original standard Canadian airworthiness certificate or the
date of issuance of the original Canadian export certificate of airworthiness, or within 2 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
Within 24 months after those inspections, or within 2
months after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later.
Within 48 months after that inspection, or within 2
months after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later.
Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Related Information
(h) Canadian airworthiness directive CF–
2005–08R1, issued August 10, 2005, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
26, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–1684 Filed 2–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1
[Docket No. FAA–2006–23816; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–247–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Aerospatiale
Model ATR42 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:52 Feb 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Aerospatiale Model ATR42 airplanes.
This proposed AD would require onetime inspections to detect discrepancies
(e.g., cracking, loose/sheared fasteners,
distortion) of the upper skin and rib feet
of the outer wing boxes, and repair if
necessary. This proposed AD results
from a report of cracking on the upper
skin and ribs of the outer wing box on
an in-service airplane. We are proposing
this AD to detect and correct these
discrepancies, which could result in
reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 10, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Contact Aerospatiale, 316 Route de
Bayonne, 31060 Toulouse, Cedex 03,
France, for service information
identified in this proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–1137;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2006–23816; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–247–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6411-6413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1684]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-23798; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-162-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. This proposed
AD would require replacing all domed anchor nuts at all attachment
locations of the upper fuel access panels of the center wing in the wet
bay location with new nuts. This proposed AD results from reported
cases of corroded dome anchor nuts at the attachment locations of the
upper surface of the fuel access panel of the center wing. We are
proposing this AD to prevent corrosion or perforation of domed anchor
nuts, which could result in arcing and ignition of fuel vapor in the
center wing fuel tank during a lightning strike and consequent
explosion of the fuel tank.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 10, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to http: //dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building, room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division,
123 Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada, for service
information identified in this proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Duckett, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7525; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``FAA-2006-
23798; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-162-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after the Docket Management System
receives them.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the airworthiness
authority for Canada, notified us that an unsafe condition may exist on
certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. TCCA advises that,
during ``2C'' checks, there have been a number of reported cases of
corrosion of dome anchor nuts at the attachment locations of the upper
surface of the fuel access panel of the center wing. In some cases, the
dome anchor nuts were severely corroded and perforated. This condition,
if not corrected, could result in arcing and ignition of fuel vapor in
the center wing fuel tank during a lightning strike and consequent
explosion of the fuel tank.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin 84-57-10, Revision ``A,''
dated March 14, 2005. The service bulletin describes procedures for
replacing all domed anchor nuts at all attachment locations of the
upper fuel access panels of the center wing in the wet bay location
with new, corrosion-resistant anchor nuts. Accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information is intended to adequately address
the unsafe condition.
The TCCA mandated the service information described previously, or
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-57-11,
[[Page 6412]]
dated February 25, 2004, or Revision ``A,'' dated March 9, 2004; and
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-57-12, dated March 11, 2005. The TCCA
also issued Canadian airworthiness directive CF-2005-08R1, issued
August 10, 2005, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these
airplanes in Canada.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
These airplane models are manufactured in Canada and are type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
Sec. 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the
applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the TCCA has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. We have examined the TCCA's findings,
evaluated all pertinent information, and determined that we need to
issue an AD for airplanes of this type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Therefore, we are proposing this AD, which would require
accomplishing the actions specified in Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-
57-10, Revision ``A,'' dated March 14, 2005.
Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Canadian Airworthiness
Directive
Instead of doing the replacement specified in Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84-57-10, Revision ``A,'' dated March 14, 2005, Canadian
airworthiness directive mandates the inspections, installation, and
corrective actions if necessary specified in Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84-57-11, dated February 25, 2004, or Revision ``A,'' dated
March 9, 2004; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-57-12, dated March
11, 2005. The TCCA allows those actions because of the limited
availability of new, corrosion-resistant anchor nuts.
Since issuance of the Canadian airworthiness directive, the TCCA
has advised us that corrosion-resistant anchor nuts are now available.
Therefore, this proposed AD would require only the replacement
specified in Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-57-10. In addition, the
Canadian airworthiness directive requires the replacement within 9
months after April 27, 2005 (the effective date of the Canadian
airworthiness directive). However, this proposed AD would require the
replacement within 3 months after the effective date of the AD.
Deterioration of anchor nuts over time can cause the anchor nuts to
become perforated, which could result in a potential source of ignition
in a fuel tank and consequent fire or explosion. Therefore, we have
determined that a compliance time of 3 months after the effective date
of this AD is the maximum time allowable for all affected airplanes to
continue to operate without compromising safety. TCCA agrees with our
decision to mandate that replacement and to shorten the compliance
time, which will align closer to their compliance date. Bombardier has
been contacted, and they can support the part requirements.
Costs of Compliance
This proposed AD would affect about 20 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The proposed actions would take about 62 work hours per airplane, at an
average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Required parts would cost
about $300 per airplane. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of
the proposed AD for U.S. operators is $86,600, or $4,330 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly de Havilland, Inc.): Docket No. FAA-2006-
23798; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-162-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by March 10,
2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 series
airplanes, certificated in any category; serial numbers 4001, and
4003 through 4115 inclusive.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reported cases of corroded dome anchor
nuts at the attachment locations of the upper surface of the fuel
access panel of the center wing. We are issuing this AD to prevent
corrosion or perforation of domed anchor nuts, which could result in
arcing and ignition of fuel vapor in the center wing fuel tank
during a lightning strike and consequent explosion of the fuel tank.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
[[Page 6413]]
Replacement With Corrosion Resistant Anchor Nuts
(f) At the applicable time in Table 1 of this AD, replace all
domed anchor nuts at all attachment locations of the upper fuel
access panels of the center wing in the wet bay location with new,
corrosion-resistant anchor nuts. Do all the actions in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
84-57-10, Revision `A,' dated March 14, 2005.
Table 1.--Compliance Time
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On which the
For airplanes having serial inspection(s) Do the replacement
number(s) specified in
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) 4108 through 4115 None................ Within 48 months
inclusive. after the date of
issuance of the
original standard
Canadian
airworthiness
certificate or the
date of issuance of
the original
Canadian export
certificate of
airworthiness, or
within 2 months
after the effective
date of this AD,
whichever occurs
later.
(2) 4001, and 4003 through Bombardier Service Within 24 months
4107 inclusive. Bulletin 84-57-11, after those
dated February 25, inspections, or
2005; or Revision within 2 months
`A,' dated March 9, after the effective
2005; have been date of this AD,
done before the whichever occurs
effective date of later.
this AD.
Bombardier Service Within 48 months
Bulletin 84-57-12, after that
dated March 11, inspection, or
2005, has been done within 2 months
before the after the effective
effective date of date of this AD,
this AD. whichever occurs
later.
Bombardier Service Within 3 months
Bulletin 84-57-11, after the effective
dated February 25, date of this AD.
2005, or Revision
`A,' dated March 9,
2005; or Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-
57-12, dated March
11, 2005; has not
been done before
the effective date
of this AD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Related Information
(h) Canadian airworthiness directive CF-2005-08R1, issued August
10, 2005, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 26, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-1684 Filed 2-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P