In the Matter of the University of Washington; (The University of Washington Research Reactor); Order Modifying Requirements for Dismantling of Facility and Disposition of Component Parts, 6292-6294 [E6-1625]
Download as PDF
6292
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 7, 2006 / Notices
4. After declaring the ENS operable,
the Licensee shall conduct periodic
testing to demonstrate reliable ENS
system performance.
5. The results from testing as
discussed in paragraph C.4 shall be
reported, in writing, to the NRC
Document Control Desk, with a copy to
the Director of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, documenting the results of
each test, until there are 3 consecutive
tests testing the operability of all ENS
components used during an actual
activation), conducted no sooner than
25 days and no more than 45 days from
the previous test with a 97% overall
entire emergency planning zone success
rate with no individual county failure
rate greater than 10%. A false negative
report from a feedback system will
constitute a siren failure for the
purposes of this test.
III. The Licensee shall submit a
written report to the NRC Document
Control Desk, with a copy to the
Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation,
when the ENS is declared operable.
IV. The Licensee shall submit a
written report to the NRC Document
Control Desk and provide a copy to the
Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
when it has achieved full compliance
with the requirements contained in this
Order.
V. The Licensee may use the criteria
contained in 10 CFR 50.54(q) to make
changes to the requirements contained
in this Order without prior NRC
approval provided that they do not
reduce the effectiveness of the Order
requirements or the approved
emergency plan. The Licensee shall
notify, in writing, the NRC Document
Control Desk, with a copy to the
Director, Division of Preparedness and
Response, Office of Nuclear Security
and Incident Response, 30 days in
advance of implementing such a change.
For other changes, the Licensee may
submit a request, in writing, to the NRC
Document Control Desk, with a copy to
the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, to relax or rescind any of the
above requirements upon a showing of
good cause by the Licensee.
erjones on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
V
Any person adversely affected by this
Confirmatory Order, other than the
Licensee, may request a hearing within
20 days of its issuance. Where good
cause is shown, consideration will be
given to extending the time to request a
hearing. A request for extension of time
must be made in writing to the Director,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555, and include a
statement of good cause for the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Feb 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
extension. Any request for a hearing
shall be submitted to the Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Chief, Rulemakings and Adjudications
Staff, Washington, DC 20555. Copies of
the hearing request shall also be sent to
the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555; to
the Assistant General Counsel for
Materials Litigation and Enforcement at
the same address; to the Regional
Administrator, NRC Region I, U.S. NRC
Region I, 475 Allendale Road, King of
Prussia, PA 19406–1415; and to the
Licensee, Entergy Nuclear Operations,
Inc., 440 Hamilton Avenue, White
Plains, NY 10601. Because of continuing
disruptions in delivery of mail to United
States Government offices, it is
requested that answers and requests for
hearing or for time extensions be
transmitted to the Secretary of the
Commission either by means of
facsimile transmission to 301–415–
1101, or by e-mail to
hearingdocket@nrc.gov, and also to the
Office of the General Counsel either by
means of facsimile transmission to 301–
415–3725 or by e-mail to
OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. If a person
other than the Licensee requests a
hearing, that person shall set forth with
particularity the manner in which his
interest is adversely affected by this
Order and shall address the criteria set
forth in 10 CFR 2.309.
If the hearing is requested by a person
whose interest is adversely affected, the
Commission will issue an Order
designating the time and place of any
hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to
be considered at such hearing shall be
whether this Confirmatory Order should
be sustained.
In the absence of any request for
hearing or written approval of an
extension of time in which to request a
hearing, the provisions specified in
section IV above shall be final 20 days
from the date of this Order without
further order or proceedings. If an
extension of time for requesting a
hearing has been approved, the
provisions specified in section IV shall
be final when the extension expires if a
hearing request has not been received.
An Answer or a Request for Hearing
Shall Not Stay the Immediate
Effectiveness of this Order.
For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Dated this 31st day of January 2006.
J.E. Dyer,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E6–1626 Filed 2–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–139; EA–05–230]
In the Matter of the University of
Washington; (The University of
Washington Research Reactor); Order
Modifying Requirements for
Dismantling of Facility and Disposition
of Component Parts
I
The University of Washington (UW or
the licensee) is the holder of Facility
License No. R–73 issued by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC or
Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR part
50. The license authorizes possession
but not operation of the UW Research
Reactor (the facility) in accordance with
conditions specified therein. The
facility is located on the licensee’s
campus in Seattle, Washington.
II
By application dated August 2, 1994,
the licensee requested authorization to
dismantle the UW Research Reactor and
to dispose of the component parts, in
accordance with the decommissioning
plan (DP) submitted as part of the
application. The NRC reviewed the
application with respect to the
provisions of the Commission’s rules
and regulations and found that the
dismantling and disposal of component
parts as stated in the licensee’s DP are
consistent with the regulations in 10
CFR Chapter 1 and are not inimical to
the common defense and security or to
the health and safety of the public. On
May 1, 1995, the Commission issued an
‘‘Order Authorizing Dismantling of
Facility and Disposition of Component
Parts’’ (the 1995 order) to the licensee to
dismantle the UW Research Reactor
facility covered by Facility License No.
R–73, as amended, and dispose of the
component parts in accordance with its
DP and the Commission’s rules and
regulations.
By letter dated October 27, 2004, as
supplemented on March 18 and
September 28, 2005, the licensee
requested that the NRC amend the 1995
order to allow the licensee to make
certain changes to the DP without prior
NRC approval.
III
The licensee requested that the
provisions of 10 CFR 50.59 be made
applicable to the DP for the UW
Research Reactor to allow the licensee
to make certain changes to the DP
without prior Commission approval.
The licensee made this request to allow
flexibility during decommissioning in
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 7, 2006 / Notices
making changes which are of minimal
significance to safety. At the time the
UW DP was approved, the DP was a
stand-alone document approved by the
order. The DP was not part of the safety
analysis report and there was no process
in the DP or the 1995 order to allow
changes to be made to the DP without
prior Commission approval. The UW
was ordered to dismantle the facility
and dispose of the component parts in
accordance with the DP and the
Commission’s rules and regulations.
The regulations in 10 CFR 50.59 did not
apply to the UW DP because 10 CFR
50.59 applies to changes to the facility
safety analysis report. In addition, 10
CFR 50.59 does not apply to the UW
reactor, because it no longer is
authorized to operate. In a request for
additional information, the staff asked
the licensee to propose wording for
making changes to the UW DP. The staff
also asked the licensee to identify the
sections of the DP that would not be
subject to the proposed change process
and would require prior Commission
approval to be made.
The NRC staff has reviewed the
proposed change process by the licensee
and concludes that it will allow the
licensee to make changes to the DP
without prior Commission approval
consistent with the intent of the 10 CFR
50.59 process. Therefore, the licensee’s
proposed change process is acceptable
to the staff. The staff has also reviewed
the sections of the DP that the licensee
proposes not to change without prior
Commission approval. These sections
concern the DECON decommissioning
option chosen by the licensee, the
criteria proposed by the licensee and
approved by the Commission for
unrestricted release of the facility and
the site, the Technical and Safety
Committee, which is a requirement of
the technical specifications, and the
radiation exposure limits, which are a
requirement of the regulations in 10
CFR part 20. Therefore the licensee’s
proposed list of DP sections not subject
to the change process is acceptable to
the staff.
erjones on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
IV
Accordingly, pursuant to sections
104c, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182, and 186 of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended, and the Commission’s
regulations in 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR
part 50, It is hereby ordered that:
The University of Washington
Nuclear Reactor Decommissioning Plan
dated July 1994 be modified to add the
following:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Feb 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
10.0 Decommissioning Plan Change
Process
(a) Definitions for the purposes of this
section:
(1) Change means a modification or
addition to, or removal from, the facility
or procedures that affects a design
function, method of performing or
controlling the function, or an
evaluation that demonstrates that
intended functions will be
accomplished.
(2) Departure from a method of
evaluation described in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated)
used in establishing the design bases or
in the safety analyses means:
(i) Changing any of the elements of
the method described in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated)
unless the results of the analysis are
conservative or essentially the same; or
(ii) Changing from a method described
in the Decommissioning Plan to another
method unless that method has been
approved by NRC for the intended
application.
(3) Facility as described in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated)
means:
(i) The structures, systems, and
components (SSC) that are described in
the Decommissioning Plan (as updated),
(ii) The design and performance
requirements for such SSCs described in
the Decommissioning Plan (as updated),
and
(iii) The evaluations or methods of
evaluation included in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated) for
such SSCs which demonstrate that their
intended function(s) will be
accomplished.
(4) Decommissioning Plan (as
updated) means the Decommissioning
Plan submitted and approved by the
Commission, as amended and
supplemented, and as updated per the
requirements of Sec. 50.71, as
applicable.
(5) Procedures as described in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated)
means those procedures that contain
information described in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated)
such as how structures, systems, and
components are operated and controlled
(including assumed operator actions
and response times).
(6) Tests or experiments not described
in the Decommissioning Plan (as
updated) means any activity where any
structure, system, or component is
utilized or controlled in a manner
which is either:
(i) Outside the reference bounds of the
design bases as described in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated) or
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6293
(ii) Inconsistent with the analyses or
descriptions in the Decommissioning
Plan (as updated).
(b)(1) The University may make
changes in the facility as described in
the Decommissioning Plan (as updated),
make changes in the procedures as
described in the Decommissioning Plan
(as updated), and conduct tests or
experiments not described in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated)
without obtaining Commission approval
only if:
(i) A change to the technical
specifications incorporated in the
license is not required, and
(ii) The change, test, or experiment
does not meet any of the criteria in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
(2) The University shall obtain
Commission approval prior to
implementing a proposed change, test,
or experiment if the change, test, or
experiment would:
(i) Result in more than a minimal
increase in the frequency of occurrence
of an accident previously evaluated in
the Decommissioning Plan (as updated);
(ii) Result in more than a minimal
increase in the likelihood of occurrence
of a malfunction of a structure, system,
or component (SSC) important to safety
previously evaluated in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated);
(iii) Result in more than a minimal
increase in the consequences of an
accident previously evaluated in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated);
(iv) Result in more than a minimal
increase in the consequences of a
malfunction of an SSC important to
safety previously evaluated in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated);
(v) Create a possibility for an accident
of a different type than any previously
evaluated in the Decommissioning Plan
(as updated);
(vi) Result in a departure from a
method of evaluation described in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated)
used in establishing the design bases or
in the safety analyses.
(3) In implementing this paragraph,
the Decommissioning Plan (as updated)
is considered to include
Decommissioning Plan changes
pursuant to this condition and changes
ordered by the Commission.
(4) The provisions in this section do
not apply to changes to the facility or
procedures when the applicable
regulations establish more specific
criteria for accomplishing such changes.
(c)(1) The licensee shall maintain
records of changes in the facility, of
changes in procedures, and of tests and
experiments made pursuant to
paragraph (b) of this section. These
records must include a written
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
6294
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 7, 2006 / Notices
evaluation which provides the bases for
the determination that the change, test,
or experiment does not require
Commission approval pursuant to
paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
(2) The licensee shall submit, as
specified in 10 CFR 50.4, a report
containing a brief description of any
changes, tests, and experiments,
including a summary of the evaluation
of each. A report must be submitted at
intervals not to exceed 24 months.
(3) The records of changes in the
facility must be maintained until the
termination of a license issued pursuant
to 10 CFR Part 50. Records of changes
in procedures and records of tests and
experiments must be maintained for a
period of 5 years.
(d) The following sections of the
Decommissioning Plan (as amended) are
not subject to the Decommissioning
Plan change process: 1.3.1, 2.1, 1.3.7.1,
1.3.7.2, 2.6, 2.3.2, and 3.2.2.
erjones on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
V
Any person adversely affected by this
Order may request a hearing on this
Order within 20 days of the date of this
Order. Where good cause is shown,
consideration will be given to extending
the time to request a hearing. A request
for an extension must be made in
writing to the Director, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555, and must include a statement
of good cause for the extension.
A request for a hearing or a petition
for leave to intervene must be filed (1)
by first class mail addressed to the
Office of the Secretary of the
Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff; (2) by courier,
express mail, and expedited delivery
services to the Office of the Secretary,
Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland, 20852, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; (3)
by e-mail addressed to the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, hearingdocket@nrc.gov; or
(4) by facsimile transmission addressed
to the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC, Attention:
Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff at
301–415–1101 (the verification number
is 301–415–1966). A copy of the request
for hearing and petition for leave to
intervene must also be sent to the Office
of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, and NRC requests that
copies be transmitted either by facsimile
transmission to 301–415–3725 or by e-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Feb 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
mail to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. A copy
of the request for hearing and petition
for leave to intervene should also be
sent to the licensee. The licensee’s
contact for this is Stanley J. Addison,
UW Radiation Safety Officer, University
of Washington, Environmental Health
and Safety, 201 Hall Health Center, Box
354400, Seattle, Washington 98195–
4400.
If a person other than the licensee
requests a hearing, he or she shall set
forth with particularity the manner in
which his or her interest is adversely
affected by this Order and shall address
the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.309.
If a hearing is requested by the
licensee or a person whose interest is
adversely affected, the Commission will
issue an order designating the time and
place of any hearing. If a hearing is held,
the issue to be considered at such
hearing shall be whether this Order
should be sustained.
In the absence of any request for a
hearing or written approval of an
extension of time in which to request a
hearing, the provisions specified in
section IV above shall be effective and
final 20 days from the date of this Order
without further order or proceedings. If
an extension of time for requesting a
hearing has been approved, the
provisions specified in section IV shall
be final when the extension expires if a
hearing request has not been received.
For further information see the
application from the licensee dated
October 27, 2004 (ML043090558), as
supplemented on March 18
(ML050900307) and September 28, 2005
(ML052770539), and the staff’s safety
evaluation dated January 31, 2006
(ML052910487), available for public
inspection at the Commission’s Public
Document Room (PDR), located at One
White Flint North, Public File Area O1
F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available
records will be accessible electronically
from the Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading
Room on the Internet at the NRC Web
site, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html (use the ADAMS ML
numbers given above). Persons who do
not have access to ADAMS or who have
problems in accessing the documents in
ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR
reference staff by telephone at 1–800–
397–4209 or 301–415–4737 or by e-mail
to pdr@nrc.gov.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated this 31st day of January 2006.
Christopher I. Grimes,
Director, Division of Policy and Rulemaking,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E6–1625 Filed 2–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards; Subcommittee Meeting on
Thermal-Hydraulic Phenomena; Notice
of Meeting
The ACRS Subcommittee on ThermalHydraulic Phenomena will hold a
meeting on February 14–16, 2006, Room
T–2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
The entire meeting will be open to
public attendance, with the exception of
portions that may be closed to discuss
that is proprietary to various equipment
vendors pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4).
The agenda for the subject meeting
shall be as follows:
Tuesday, February 14, 2006—8:30 a.m.
until the conclusion of business.
Wednesday, February 15, 2006—8:30
a.m. until the conclusion of business.
Thursday, February 16, 2006—8:30 a.m.
until the conclusion of business.
The Subcommittee will discuss and
hear a briefing from the NRC staff, the
Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), and
other interested stakeholders regarding
recent work related to chemical effects
in containment sumps during loss of
coolant accident events, and licensee
responses to Generic Letter 2004–02
concerning pressurized water reactor
sumps. The Subcommittee will hear
presentations by and hold discussions
with representatives of the NRC staff,
NEI, licensees, contractors, and other
interested persons regarding this matter.
The Subcommittee will gather
information, analyze relevant issues and
facts, and formulate proposed positions
and actions, as appropriate, for
deliberation by the full Committee.
Members of the public desiring to
provide oral statements and/or written
comments should notify the Designated
Federal Official, Mr. Ralph Caruso
(Telephone: 301–415–8065) five days
prior to the meeting, if possible, so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
Electronic recordings will be permitted
only during those portions of the
meeting that are open to the public.
Further information regarding this
meeting can be obtained by contacting
the Designated Federal Official between
7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET). Persons
planning to attend this meeting are
urged to contact the above named
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6292-6294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1625]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-139; EA-05-230]
In the Matter of the University of Washington; (The University of
Washington Research Reactor); Order Modifying Requirements for
Dismantling of Facility and Disposition of Component Parts
I
The University of Washington (UW or the licensee) is the holder of
Facility License No. R-73 issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC or Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR part 50. The license authorizes
possession but not operation of the UW Research Reactor (the facility)
in accordance with conditions specified therein. The facility is
located on the licensee's campus in Seattle, Washington.
II
By application dated August 2, 1994, the licensee requested
authorization to dismantle the UW Research Reactor and to dispose of
the component parts, in accordance with the decommissioning plan (DP)
submitted as part of the application. The NRC reviewed the application
with respect to the provisions of the Commission's rules and
regulations and found that the dismantling and disposal of component
parts as stated in the licensee's DP are consistent with the
regulations in 10 CFR Chapter 1 and are not inimical to the common
defense and security or to the health and safety of the public. On May
1, 1995, the Commission issued an ``Order Authorizing Dismantling of
Facility and Disposition of Component Parts'' (the 1995 order) to the
licensee to dismantle the UW Research Reactor facility covered by
Facility License No. R-73, as amended, and dispose of the component
parts in accordance with its DP and the Commission's rules and
regulations.
By letter dated October 27, 2004, as supplemented on March 18 and
September 28, 2005, the licensee requested that the NRC amend the 1995
order to allow the licensee to make certain changes to the DP without
prior NRC approval.
III
The licensee requested that the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59 be made
applicable to the DP for the UW Research Reactor to allow the licensee
to make certain changes to the DP without prior Commission approval.
The licensee made this request to allow flexibility during
decommissioning in
[[Page 6293]]
making changes which are of minimal significance to safety. At the time
the UW DP was approved, the DP was a stand-alone document approved by
the order. The DP was not part of the safety analysis report and there
was no process in the DP or the 1995 order to allow changes to be made
to the DP without prior Commission approval. The UW was ordered to
dismantle the facility and dispose of the component parts in accordance
with the DP and the Commission's rules and regulations. The regulations
in 10 CFR 50.59 did not apply to the UW DP because 10 CFR 50.59 applies
to changes to the facility safety analysis report. In addition, 10 CFR
50.59 does not apply to the UW reactor, because it no longer is
authorized to operate. In a request for additional information, the
staff asked the licensee to propose wording for making changes to the
UW DP. The staff also asked the licensee to identify the sections of
the DP that would not be subject to the proposed change process and
would require prior Commission approval to be made.
The NRC staff has reviewed the proposed change process by the
licensee and concludes that it will allow the licensee to make changes
to the DP without prior Commission approval consistent with the intent
of the 10 CFR 50.59 process. Therefore, the licensee's proposed change
process is acceptable to the staff. The staff has also reviewed the
sections of the DP that the licensee proposes not to change without
prior Commission approval. These sections concern the DECON
decommissioning option chosen by the licensee, the criteria proposed by
the licensee and approved by the Commission for unrestricted release of
the facility and the site, the Technical and Safety Committee, which is
a requirement of the technical specifications, and the radiation
exposure limits, which are a requirement of the regulations in 10 CFR
part 20. Therefore the licensee's proposed list of DP sections not
subject to the change process is acceptable to the staff.
IV
Accordingly, pursuant to sections 104c, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182, and
186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's
regulations in 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR part 50, It is hereby ordered
that:
The University of Washington Nuclear Reactor Decommissioning Plan
dated July 1994 be modified to add the following:
10.0 Decommissioning Plan Change Process
(a) Definitions for the purposes of this section:
(1) Change means a modification or addition to, or removal from,
the facility or procedures that affects a design function, method of
performing or controlling the function, or an evaluation that
demonstrates that intended functions will be accomplished.
(2) Departure from a method of evaluation described in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated) used in establishing the design bases
or in the safety analyses means:
(i) Changing any of the elements of the method described in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated) unless the results of the analysis
are conservative or essentially the same; or
(ii) Changing from a method described in the Decommissioning Plan
to another method unless that method has been approved by NRC for the
intended application.
(3) Facility as described in the Decommissioning Plan (as updated)
means:
(i) The structures, systems, and components (SSC) that are
described in the Decommissioning Plan (as updated),
(ii) The design and performance requirements for such SSCs
described in the Decommissioning Plan (as updated), and
(iii) The evaluations or methods of evaluation included in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated) for such SSCs which demonstrate that
their intended function(s) will be accomplished.
(4) Decommissioning Plan (as updated) means the Decommissioning
Plan submitted and approved by the Commission, as amended and
supplemented, and as updated per the requirements of Sec. 50.71, as
applicable.
(5) Procedures as described in the Decommissioning Plan (as
updated) means those procedures that contain information described in
the Decommissioning Plan (as updated) such as how structures, systems,
and components are operated and controlled (including assumed operator
actions and response times).
(6) Tests or experiments not described in the Decommissioning Plan
(as updated) means any activity where any structure, system, or
component is utilized or controlled in a manner which is either:
(i) Outside the reference bounds of the design bases as described
in the Decommissioning Plan (as updated) or
(ii) Inconsistent with the analyses or descriptions in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated).
(b)(1) The University may make changes in the facility as described
in the Decommissioning Plan (as updated), make changes in the
procedures as described in the Decommissioning Plan (as updated), and
conduct tests or experiments not described in the Decommissioning Plan
(as updated) without obtaining Commission approval only if:
(i) A change to the technical specifications incorporated in the
license is not required, and
(ii) The change, test, or experiment does not meet any of the
criteria in paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
(2) The University shall obtain Commission approval prior to
implementing a proposed change, test, or experiment if the change,
test, or experiment would:
(i) Result in more than a minimal increase in the frequency of
occurrence of an accident previously evaluated in the Decommissioning
Plan (as updated);
(ii) Result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of
occurrence of a malfunction of a structure, system, or component (SSC)
important to safety previously evaluated in the Decommissioning Plan
(as updated);
(iii) Result in more than a minimal increase in the consequences of
an accident previously evaluated in the Decommissioning Plan (as
updated);
(iv) Result in more than a minimal increase in the consequences of
a malfunction of an SSC important to safety previously evaluated in the
Decommissioning Plan (as updated);
(v) Create a possibility for an accident of a different type than
any previously evaluated in the Decommissioning Plan (as updated);
(vi) Result in a departure from a method of evaluation described in
the Decommissioning Plan (as updated) used in establishing the design
bases or in the safety analyses.
(3) In implementing this paragraph, the Decommissioning Plan (as
updated) is considered to include Decommissioning Plan changes pursuant
to this condition and changes ordered by the Commission.
(4) The provisions in this section do not apply to changes to the
facility or procedures when the applicable regulations establish more
specific criteria for accomplishing such changes.
(c)(1) The licensee shall maintain records of changes in the
facility, of changes in procedures, and of tests and experiments made
pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section. These records must include a
written
[[Page 6294]]
evaluation which provides the bases for the determination that the
change, test, or experiment does not require Commission approval
pursuant to paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
(2) The licensee shall submit, as specified in 10 CFR 50.4, a
report containing a brief description of any changes, tests, and
experiments, including a summary of the evaluation of each. A report
must be submitted at intervals not to exceed 24 months.
(3) The records of changes in the facility must be maintained until
the termination of a license issued pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50. Records
of changes in procedures and records of tests and experiments must be
maintained for a period of 5 years.
(d) The following sections of the Decommissioning Plan (as amended)
are not subject to the Decommissioning Plan change process: 1.3.1, 2.1,
1.3.7.1, 1.3.7.2, 2.6, 2.3.2, and 3.2.2.
V
Any person adversely affected by this Order may request a hearing
on this Order within 20 days of the date of this Order. Where good
cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the time to
request a hearing. A request for an extension must be made in writing
to the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and must include a
statement of good cause for the extension.
A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must
be filed (1) by first class mail addressed to the Office of the
Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications
Staff; (2) by courier, express mail, and expedited delivery services to
the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, Attention: Rulemaking
and Adjudications Staff; (3) by e-mail addressed to the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, hearingdocket@nrc.gov;
or (4) by facsimile transmission addressed to the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC,
Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff at 301-415-1101 (the
verification number is 301-415-1966). A copy of the request for hearing
and petition for leave to intervene must also be sent to the Office of
the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001, and NRC requests that copies be transmitted either by
facsimile transmission to 301-415-3725 or by e-mail to
OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. A copy of the request for hearing and petition
for leave to intervene should also be sent to the licensee. The
licensee's contact for this is Stanley J. Addison, UW Radiation Safety
Officer, University of Washington, Environmental Health and Safety, 201
Hall Health Center, Box 354400, Seattle, Washington 98195-4400.
If a person other than the licensee requests a hearing, he or she
shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his or her
interest is adversely affected by this Order and shall address the
criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.309.
If a hearing is requested by the licensee or a person whose
interest is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an order
designating the time and place of any hearing. If a hearing is held,
the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Order
should be sustained.
In the absence of any request for a hearing or written approval of
an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions
specified in section IV above shall be effective and final 20 days from
the date of this Order without further order or proceedings. If an
extension of time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the
provisions specified in section IV shall be final when the extension
expires if a hearing request has not been received.
For further information see the application from the licensee dated
October 27, 2004 (ML043090558), as supplemented on March 18
(ML050900307) and September 28, 2005 (ML052770539), and the staff's
safety evaluation dated January 31, 2006 (ML052910487), available for
public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room (PDR),
located at One White Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available
records will be accessible electronically from the Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on
the Internet at the NRC Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html (use the ADAMS ML numbers given above). Persons who do not
have access to ADAMS or who have problems in accessing the documents in
ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR reference staff by telephone at 1-800-
397-4209 or 301-415-4737 or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Dated this 31st day of January 2006.
Christopher I. Grimes,
Director, Division of Policy and Rulemaking, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E6-1625 Filed 2-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P